Search

Your search keyword '"Rattanaprichavej,Piti"' showing total 31 results
Start Over Author "Rattanaprichavej,Piti"
31 results on '"Rattanaprichavej,Piti"'

5. Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early Postoperative Recovery

Author

Laoruengthana,Artit, Reosanguanwong,Kongpob, Rattanaprichavej,Piti, Sahasoonthorn,Kamonnop, Santisathaporn,Nopparat, Pongpirul,Krit, Laoruengthana,Artit, Reosanguanwong,Kongpob, Rattanaprichavej,Piti, Sahasoonthorn,Kamonnop, Santisathaporn,Nopparat, and Pongpirul,Krit

Abstract

Artit Laoruengthana,1 Kongpob Reosanguanwong,1 Piti Rattanaprichavej,1 Kamonnop Sahasoonthorn,1 Nopparat Santisathaporn,1 Krit Pongpirul2,3 1Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand; 2Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; 3Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USACorrespondence: Kongpob Reosanguanwong, Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand, Email reosanguanwongk@gmail.comBackground: Cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may provide better physiological knee kinematics, proprioception, and quadricep recovery than posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. Therefore, we hypothesized that CR TKA with multimodal pain control may provide comparable postoperative pain and recovery as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).Methods: This study included patients with isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent CR TKA and UKA. TKA and UKA patients were propensity score-matched with age and body mass index (BMI) and compared using visual analog scales (VAS) for pain scores, total amount of morphine use (TMU), knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR), independent ambulation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs during hospitalization.Results: After propensity score matching, 46 patients were included in the TKA and UKA groups, respectively, with no differences in demographic data. VAS at 6– 72 h and TMU at 48 h after surgery were comparable between the groups. The knee flexion angle in the UKA group was significantly higher at 24 h (60.0° vs 46.6°; p< 0.001) and 48 h (76.9° vs 69.1°; p = 0.021) than that in the TKA group. The SLR in the UKA group was significantly higher than that in the TKA group at 24– 72 h. The UKA group ambulated significantly earlier (1.56 vs 2.13 days; p< 0.001), had shorte

Published
2024

19. Asia-Pacific venous thromboembolism consensus in knee and hip arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery: Part 1. Diagnosis and risk factors

Author

Ngarmukos, Srihatach, Kim, Kang Il, Wongsak, Siwadol, Chotanaphuti, Thanainit, Inaba, Yutaka, Chen, Cheng Fong, Liu, David, Unnanuntana, Aasis, Tan, Alvin, Pohl, Anthony, Angsugomutkul, Apisak, Patamarat, Apisit, Limtrakul, Arak, Tanavalee, Aree, Merican, Azhar, Abbas, Azlina, Badaruddin, Badrul Shah, Pongcharoen, Boonchana, Khanh, Bui Hong Thien, Li, Cao, Ngarmukos, Chaithavat, Sumettavanich, Charlee, Sumanasrethakul, Chavanont, Amarase, Chavarin, Chan, Chee Ken, Chang, Chong Bum, Tanavalee, Chotetawan, Mow, Christopher Scott, Leelasestaporn, Chumroonkiet, Yan, Chun Hoi, Tran, Dang Khoa, Campbell, David, Mustamsir, Edi, Arandia, Edsel Fernandez, Song, Eun Kyoo, Simanjuntak, G. Ruslan Nazaruddin, Muratsu, Hirotsugu, Choe, Hyonmin, Mohammad, Jamal Azmi, Fan, Jason Chi Ho, Bae, Ji Hoon, Kim, Ji Wan, San Juan, Jose Antonio, Syquia, Jose Fernando C., Kim, Jun Ho, Novito, Ki Ki, Sithitool, Kriskamol, Sakdinakiattikoon, Manoon, Matsubara, Masaaki, Lee, Mel S., Chilmi, Mohamad Zaim, Thaung, Myint, Lee, Myung Chul, Kongsakpaisal, Narathorn, Lo, Ngai Nung, Budhiparama, Nicolaas, Noree, Nikom, Sugano, Nobuhiko, Sa-ngasoongsong, Paphon, Taweekitikul, Pariwat, Bernardo, Peter, Rattanaprichavej, Piti, Pinsornsak, Piya, Wu, Po Kuei, Yuktanandana, Pongsak, Chaiyakit, Pruk, Jarayabhand, Rahat, Sorial, Rami Maher, Crawford, Ross W., Nagamine, Ryuji, Khuangsirikul, Saradej, Tantavisut, Saran, Thiengwittayaporn, Satit, Yeo, Seng Jin, Saengnipanthkul, Sukit, Suksumran, Supparurk, Meknavin, Surapoj, Chompoosang, Thakrit, Win, Than, Narinsorasak, Thana, Turajane, Thana, Reancharoen, Thanarat, Majima, Tokifumi, Chaweewannakorn, Ukrit, Kawinwonggowit, Viroj, Larbpaiboonpong, Viroj, Guo, Wanshou, Kosuwon, Weerachai, Chai, Wei, Maloney, William J., Teo, Yee Hong, Zhou, Yixin, Chen, Yunsu, Khanasuk, Yutthana, other, and, Ngarmukos, Srihatach, Kim, Kang Il, Wongsak, Siwadol, Chotanaphuti, Thanainit, Inaba, Yutaka, Chen, Cheng Fong, Liu, David, Unnanuntana, Aasis, Tan, Alvin, Pohl, Anthony, Angsugomutkul, Apisak, Patamarat, Apisit, Limtrakul, Arak, Tanavalee, Aree, Merican, Azhar, Abbas, Azlina, Badaruddin, Badrul Shah, Pongcharoen, Boonchana, Khanh, Bui Hong Thien, Li, Cao, Ngarmukos, Chaithavat, Sumettavanich, Charlee, Sumanasrethakul, Chavanont, Amarase, Chavarin, Chan, Chee Ken, Chang, Chong Bum, Tanavalee, Chotetawan, Mow, Christopher Scott, Leelasestaporn, Chumroonkiet, Yan, Chun Hoi, Tran, Dang Khoa, Campbell, David, Mustamsir, Edi, Arandia, Edsel Fernandez, Song, Eun Kyoo, Simanjuntak, G. Ruslan Nazaruddin, Muratsu, Hirotsugu, Choe, Hyonmin, Mohammad, Jamal Azmi, Fan, Jason Chi Ho, Bae, Ji Hoon, Kim, Ji Wan, San Juan, Jose Antonio, Syquia, Jose Fernando C., Kim, Jun Ho, Novito, Ki Ki, Sithitool, Kriskamol, Sakdinakiattikoon, Manoon, Matsubara, Masaaki, Lee, Mel S., Chilmi, Mohamad Zaim, Thaung, Myint, Lee, Myung Chul, Kongsakpaisal, Narathorn, Lo, Ngai Nung, Budhiparama, Nicolaas, Noree, Nikom, Sugano, Nobuhiko, Sa-ngasoongsong, Paphon, Taweekitikul, Pariwat, Bernardo, Peter, Rattanaprichavej, Piti, Pinsornsak, Piya, Wu, Po Kuei, Yuktanandana, Pongsak, Chaiyakit, Pruk, Jarayabhand, Rahat, Sorial, Rami Maher, Crawford, Ross W., Nagamine, Ryuji, Khuangsirikul, Saradej, Tantavisut, Saran, Thiengwittayaporn, Satit, Yeo, Seng Jin, Saengnipanthkul, Sukit, Suksumran, Supparurk, Meknavin, Surapoj, Chompoosang, Thakrit, Win, Than, Narinsorasak, Thana, Turajane, Thana, Reancharoen, Thanarat, Majima, Tokifumi, Chaweewannakorn, Ukrit, Kawinwonggowit, Viroj, Larbpaiboonpong, Viroj, Guo, Wanshou, Kosuwon, Weerachai, Chai, Wei, Maloney, William J., Teo, Yee Hong, Zhou, Yixin, Chen, Yunsu, Khanasuk, Yutthana, and other, and

Published
2021

20. Asia-Pacific venous thromboembolism consensus in knee and hip arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery: Part 2. Mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Author

Amarase, Chavarin, Tanavalee, Aree, Larbpaiboonpong, Viroj, Lee, Myung Chul, Crawford, Ross W., Matsubara, Masaaki, Zhou, Yixin, Unnanuntana, Aasis, Tan, Alvin, Pohl, Anthony, Angsugomutkul, Apisak, Patamarat, Apisit, Limtrakul, Arak, Merican, Azhar, Abbas, Azlina, Badaruddin, Badrul Shah, Pongcharoen, Boonchana, Khanh, Bui Hong Thien, Li, Cao, Ngarmukos, Chaithavat, Sumettavanich, Charlee, Sumanasrethakul, Chavanont, Chan, Chee Ken, Chen, Cheng Fong, Chang, Chong Bum, Tanavalee, Chotetawan, Mow, Christopher Scott, Leelasestaporn, Chumroonkiet, Yan, Chun Hoi, Tran, Dang Khoa, Campbell, David, Liu, David, Mustamsir, Edi, Arandia, Edsel Fernandez, Song, Eun Kyoo, Simanjuntak, G. Ruslan Nazaruddin, Muratsu, Hirotsugu, Choe, Hyonmin, Mohammad, Jamal Azmi, Fan, Jason Chi Ho, Bae, Ji Hoon, Kim, Ji Wan, Juan, Jose Antonio San, Syquia, Jose Fernando C., Kim, Jun Ho, Kim, Kang Il, Novito, Ki Ki, Sithitool, Kriskamol, Sakdinakiattikoon, Manoon, Lee, Mel S., Chilmi, Mohamad Zaim, Thaung, Myint, Kongsakpaisal, Narathorn, Lo, Ngai Nung, Budhiparama, Nicolaas, Noree, Nikom, Sugano, Nobuhiko, Sa-ngasoongsong, Paphon, Taweekitikul, Pariwat, Bernardo, Peter, Rattanaprichavej, Piti, Pinsornsak, Piya, Wu, Po Kuei, Yuktanandana, Pongsak, Chaiyakit, Pruk, Jarayabhand, Rahat, Sorial, Rami Maher, Nagamine, Ryuji, Khuangsirikul, Saradej, Tantavisut, Saran, Thiengwittayaporn, Satit, Yeo, Seng Jin, Wongsak, Siwadol, Ngarmukos, Srihatach, Saengnipanthkul, Sukit, Suksumran, Supparurk, Meknavin, Surapoj, Chompoosang, Thakrit, Win, Than, Narinsorasak, Thana, Turajane, Thana, Chotanaphuti, Thanainit, Reancharoen, Thanarat, Majima, Tokifumi, Chaweewannakorn, Ukrit, Kawinwonggowit, Viroj, Guo, Wanshou, Kosuwon, Weerachai, Chai, Wei, Maloney, William J., Teo, Yee Hong, Chen, Yunsu, Inaba, Yutaka, Khanasuk, Yutthana, other, and, Amarase, Chavarin, Tanavalee, Aree, Larbpaiboonpong, Viroj, Lee, Myung Chul, Crawford, Ross W., Matsubara, Masaaki, Zhou, Yixin, Unnanuntana, Aasis, Tan, Alvin, Pohl, Anthony, Angsugomutkul, Apisak, Patamarat, Apisit, Limtrakul, Arak, Merican, Azhar, Abbas, Azlina, Badaruddin, Badrul Shah, Pongcharoen, Boonchana, Khanh, Bui Hong Thien, Li, Cao, Ngarmukos, Chaithavat, Sumettavanich, Charlee, Sumanasrethakul, Chavanont, Chan, Chee Ken, Chen, Cheng Fong, Chang, Chong Bum, Tanavalee, Chotetawan, Mow, Christopher Scott, Leelasestaporn, Chumroonkiet, Yan, Chun Hoi, Tran, Dang Khoa, Campbell, David, Liu, David, Mustamsir, Edi, Arandia, Edsel Fernandez, Song, Eun Kyoo, Simanjuntak, G. Ruslan Nazaruddin, Muratsu, Hirotsugu, Choe, Hyonmin, Mohammad, Jamal Azmi, Fan, Jason Chi Ho, Bae, Ji Hoon, Kim, Ji Wan, Juan, Jose Antonio San, Syquia, Jose Fernando C., Kim, Jun Ho, Kim, Kang Il, Novito, Ki Ki, Sithitool, Kriskamol, Sakdinakiattikoon, Manoon, Lee, Mel S., Chilmi, Mohamad Zaim, Thaung, Myint, Kongsakpaisal, Narathorn, Lo, Ngai Nung, Budhiparama, Nicolaas, Noree, Nikom, Sugano, Nobuhiko, Sa-ngasoongsong, Paphon, Taweekitikul, Pariwat, Bernardo, Peter, Rattanaprichavej, Piti, Pinsornsak, Piya, Wu, Po Kuei, Yuktanandana, Pongsak, Chaiyakit, Pruk, Jarayabhand, Rahat, Sorial, Rami Maher, Nagamine, Ryuji, Khuangsirikul, Saradej, Tantavisut, Saran, Thiengwittayaporn, Satit, Yeo, Seng Jin, Wongsak, Siwadol, Ngarmukos, Srihatach, Saengnipanthkul, Sukit, Suksumran, Supparurk, Meknavin, Surapoj, Chompoosang, Thakrit, Win, Than, Narinsorasak, Thana, Turajane, Thana, Chotanaphuti, Thanainit, Reancharoen, Thanarat, Majima, Tokifumi, Chaweewannakorn, Ukrit, Kawinwonggowit, Viroj, Guo, Wanshou, Kosuwon, Weerachai, Chai, Wei, Maloney, William J., Teo, Yee Hong, Chen, Yunsu, Inaba, Yutaka, Khanasuk, Yutthana, and other, and

Published
2021

27. Rotational Mismatch of Self-Align Technique in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Author

Thanainit Chotanaphuti, Choowong, Montri, Laoruengthana, Artit, and Rattanaprichavej, Piti

Subjects
TOTAL knee replacement, POSTOPERATIVE care, COMPUTED tomography, TREATMENT effectiveness, MEDICAL quality control
Abstract

Background: Rotational malalignment of a femoral component may lead to chronic pain, patellar maltracking, knee instability, and early failure of a total knee arthroplasty [TKA], The transepicondylar axis of the femur is widely accepted as a good reference for rotational alignment of a tibial component, although it is more controversial for a tibial component. Objective: This study aimed to determine the degree of rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components implanted using the center-post self-align technique. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent TKA for osteoarthritis of the knee were enrolled to have postoperative CT scans for determination of the rotational alignment. The study included 51 patients (60 knees), 5 males and 46 females, with a mean age of 64.0 years (range 58 to 73). The posterior cruciate ligament substituting tibial component position was set using the center-post self-align technique. CT digital images in the supine position with the knee at full extension were evaluated. Results: Of the 60 TKAs, the mean rotational mismatch between tibial and femoral prostheses was 2.00° (SD+O.340, range 0.1° to 5.8°). The femoral component was rotated externally and internally within 1.5° while the tibial component was within 2.59° relative to the transepicondylar axis. All knees had good patellar tracking intraoperatively without any lateral release procedure. Conclusion: The center-post self-align technique can achieve good compatibility of rotational alignment between the femoral and tibial components with low variability, particularly with the knee in the extended position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018

29. Self-aligned Technique for Tibial Component Placement in Total Knee Arthroplasty Lessening Rotational Malalignment in Measured Resection and Gap-Balancing Techniques.

Author

Patamarat A, Kitcharanant N, Rattanaprichavej P, and Laoruengthana A

Subjects
Humans, Knee Joint diagnostic imaging, Knee Joint surgery, Tibia diagnostic imaging, Tibia surgery, Femur diagnostic imaging, Femur surgery, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee methods, Knee Prosthesis, Osteoarthritis, Knee surgery
Abstract

Background: Femorotibial rotational mismatch can occur when there is a rotational malalignment in either the tibial or femoral component. Self-aligned technique was proposed for orienting the tibial component in relation to the femoral prosthesis to reduce rotational malalignment between components. Therefore, we aimed to compare the rotational angle of the femoral and tibial components, as well as the femorotibial rotational mismatch, between the measured resection (MR) and gap-balancing (GB) techniques when combined with a self-aligned technique., Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized, experimental study with 50 patients in each group. The femoral rotation was set to 3° external rotation relative to the posterior condylar axis in the MR group, whereas the femur was resected to obtain an optimal rectangular flexion gap in the GB group. The self-aligned method was used to set the tibial rotation in both groups. Femoral and tibial rotational alignments were evaluated compared to a surgical transepicondylar axis of the femur using computed tomography. Rotational mismatch was defined as a difference between the femoral and tibial rotational alignments. A positive value indicated that the component was externally rotated relative to the reference line., Results: The femoral component of the GB group was more externally rotated than that of the MR group (1.52° ± 1.31° vs 0.28° ± 1.16°, p < 0.001). However, the tibial rotational angle was not statistically significantly different between the MR and GB groups (1.28° ± 3.17° vs. 1.86° ± 2.81°, p = 0.220), and the rotational mismatch was 1.00° ± 3.28° and 0.34° ± 2.71°, respectively ( p = 0.306)., Conclusions: Although the femoral component of the GB group had a greater degree of external rotation than that of the MR group, the use of a self-aligned technique for tibial component placement resulted in no significant difference in tibial rotational alignment or rotational mismatch. This technique helps align the tibial component with the femoral component and lessen the degree of rotational malalignment in both the MR and GB techniques., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. A comparison of accuracy between step and non-step reamers of femoral intramedullary alignment system in total knee arthroplasty evaluated by computer-assisted navigation.

Author

Vanasbodeekul P, Chotanaphuti T, Rattanaprichavej P, and Wangwittayakul V

Subjects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee methods, Equipment Design, Humans, Osteoarthritis, Knee surgery, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee instrumentation, Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Abstract

Limb alignment after total knee replacement has been demonstrated to be one of the most influential in determining long-term survival of the implants. Malalignment can contribute to early prosthesis failure through point loading and premature polyethelene wear. Alignment guides have been developed to improve the accuracy of femoral and tibial cuts during surgery. Recently, there are at least two groups of femoral intramedullary reamer. The first group uses step reamer (8 mm drill with 10 mm step) and another one uses non-step reamer (8 mm drill). The purpose of this cadaveric study was to analyse the accuracy of both design by compared with computer navigation system. Eight cadaveric lower extremities were used for the present study in four cadaveric bodies. The step reamer was applied on the left side and the non-step reamer was applied on the right side of the same cadaver. The distal femoral cuts, using femoral valgus angle 6 degrees, were performed. The resection angles between the cutting surface and the mechanical axis were measured and collected by means of computer navigation system. The results show that the step reamer resulted in 0.125 degrees +/- 0.25 degrees of varus, whereas the non-step reamer resulted in 0.5 degrees +/- 1.08 degrees of varus compared with the calculated mechanical axis by computer-assisted navigation. These data suggest that step reamer has the accuracy more than non-step reamer when evaluated by computer-assisted navigation.

Published
2012

31. The rotational axis of the tibia and relationship to the tibial torsion in varus osteoarthritic knee.

Author

Chotanaphuti T, Srisawasdi R, Rattanaprichavej P, and Laoruengthana A

Subjects
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ankle Joint diagnostic imaging, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Rotation, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Knee physiopathology, Osteoarthritis, Knee physiopathology
Abstract

Background: A transepicondylar axis is a useful reference for femoral component rotation and is demonstrated as a functional flexion-extension axis of a knee. Conversely, a rotational orientation of the tibial component was less clearly demonstrated and many anatomical landmarks were proposed. It has been reported that Asian people had more medial torsion of the tibia particularly with an osteoarthritic knee. The present study aims to address the relationship between the torsion variation of the tibia and the rotational axis of the tibia., Material and Method: Forty knees of 32 women (mean age of 73.3) with varus osteoarthritis underwent a preoperative CT images to identify a surgical epicondylar axis, an axis perpendicular to this line (femoral reference line), lines connecting between the PCL insertion and 3 reference point on the patellar tendon, an AP axis of the ankle and a tibial torsion angle., Results: The mean value of the angle between the line connecting the PCL insertion and 3 different point of the patellar tendon including the medial border medial one-third and middle of the patellar tendon and the femoral reference line was -4.22, +4.37 and +8.47 degree, respectively. The mean of a tibial torsion angle was +16.51 degree. There were 6 cases having the femoral reference line rotated internally to the medial border of the patellar tendon and having less torsion angle (medial tibial torsion) with a mean of +13.78 degree., Conclusion: The femoral reference line in the Thai osteoarthritic knee is passed between medial edge of patellar tendon and medial 1/3 of patellar tendon. This line rotates more internally compared with the patellar tendon if the degree of medial tibial torsion is more severe. An excessive externally rotated tibial component when using the patellar tendon as guidance should be avoided in the knee presenting with medial tibial torsion.

Published
2012

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results