Search

Genomewide association studies (GWAS) have resulted in the identification of many heritable genetic factors that underlie risk for human disease or variation in physiologic traits. In contrast, there are fewer GWAS of drug response phenotypes, despite extensive unexplained interindividual variability. To address this urgent need, the NIH Pharmacogenomics Research Network (PGRN) and the Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (IMS) at RIKEN support a collaboration, PGRN-RIKEN, with the goal of accelerating GWAS of drug response phenotypes.

Hypertension after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitors is associated with superior treatment outcomes for advanced cancer patients. To determine whether increased sorafenib doses cause incremental increases in blood pressure (BP), we measured 12-h ambulatory BP in 41 normotensive advanced solid tumor patients in a randomized dose-escalation study. After 7 days' treatment (400 mg b.i.d.), mean diastolic BP (DBP) increased in both study groups. After dose escalation, group A (400 mg t.i.d.) had marginally significant further increase in 12-h mean DBP (P = 0.053), but group B (600 mg b.i.d.) did not achieve statistically significant increases (P = 0.25). Within groups, individuals varied in BP response to sorafenib dose escalation, but these differences did not correlate with changes in steady-state plasma sorafenib concentrations. These findings in normotensive patients suggest BP is a complex pharmacodynamic biomarker of VEGF inhibition. Patients have intrinsic differences in sensitivity to sorafenib's BP-elevating effects.

Peripheral neuropathy is a common dose-limiting toxicity for patients treated with paclitaxel. For most individuals, there are no known risk factors that predispose patients to the adverse event, and pathogenesis for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy is unknown. Determining whether there is a heritable component to paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy would be valuable in guiding clinical decisions and may provide insight into treatment of and mechanisms for the toxicity. Using genotype and patient information from the paclitaxel arm of CALGB 40101 (Alliance), a phase III clinical trial evaluating adjuvant therapies for breast cancer in women, we estimated the variance in maximum grade and dose at first instance of sensory peripheral neuropathy. Our results suggest that paclitaxel-induced neuropathy has a heritable component, driven in part by genes involved in axon outgrowth. Disruption of axon outgrowth may be one of the mechanisms by which paclitaxel treatment results in sensory peripheral neuropathy in susceptible patients. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.

Multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2, ABCC2) is an efflux membrane transporter highly expressed in liver, kidney and intestine with important physiological and pharmacological roles. The goal of this study was to investigate the functional significance of

The antiretroviral protease inhibitor atazanavir inhibits hepatic uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, thereby preventing the glucuronidation and elimination of bilirubin. Resultant indirect hyperbilirubinemia with jaundice can cause premature discontinuation of atazanavir. Risk for bilirubin-related discontinuation is highest among individuals who carry two UGT1A1 decreased function alleles ( UGT1A1*28 or *37). We summarize published literature that supports this association and provide recommendations for atazanavir prescribing when UGT1A1 genotype is known (updates at ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is becoming increasingly evident that cancers are dependent on a number of altered molecular pathways and can develop diverse mechanisms of resistance to therapy with single agents. Therefore, combination regimens may provide the best hope for effective therapies with durable effects. Despite preclinical data to support this notion, there are many challenges to the development of targeted combinations including scientific, economic, legal, and regulatory barriers. A discussion of these challenges and identification of models and best practices are presented with intent of aiding the research community in addressing real and perceived barriers to the development of combination therapies for cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmacogenetics aims to elucidate how genetic variation affects the efficacy and side effects of drugs, with the ultimate goal of personalizing medicine. Clinical studies of the genetic variation in the uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase gene have demonstrated how reduced-function allele variants can predict the risk of severe toxicity and help identify cancer patients who could benefit from reduced-dose schedules or alternative chemotherapy. Candidate polymorphisms have also been identified in vitro, although the functional consequences of these variants still need to be tested in the clinical setting. Future approaches in uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase pharmacogenetics include genetic testing prior to drug treatment, genotype-directed dose-escalation studies, study of genetic variation at the haplotype level and genome-wide studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergence of many newer, molecularly targeted anticancer drugs requires that we rethink the way that we conduct phase II trials in oncology. In particular, we can no longer afford to advance drugs (or combinations) to phase III trials with a high risk of failure to improve on outcomes. Drawing on phase II trials of therapeutics for other chronic and progressive diseases in medicine, we find that a randomized design is essential not only for selecting agents for further study but also for optimizing the design (dose, patient population, and endpoints) of the subsequent phase III trials. We use the example of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer to demonstrate how randomized phase II trials have already made an impact in oncology, whereas single-arm phase II trials have led to negative phase III trials in the same disease. Finally, we make the case that randomized phase II trials are feasible, as long as reasonable statistical standards are applied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Werner's syndrome (WS) is a recessive disorder of premature onset of processes associated with aging. Defective DNA repair has been reported after exposure of cells isolated from WS patients to DNA-damaging agents. The germline 4330T>C (Cys1367Arg) variant in the WS gene (WRN) has been associated with protection from age-related diseases, suggesting it has a functional role. We studied whether the 4330T>C variant confers altered drug sensitivity in vitro.Methods: 4330T>C was genotyped in 372 human lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from unrelated healthy Caucasian individuals using a TaqMan-based method. The study was powered to detect the effect of the 4330T>C genotypes after exposure to camptothecin (based upon preliminary data). The effect of the 4330T>C variant on the cytotoxicity of etoposide, carboplatin, cisplatin and daunorubicin was also tested. WRN expression in 57 LCLs was measured by microarray.Results: No significant difference between the IC50 of the cells was observed among genotypes (P = 0.46) after exposure to camptothecin. No association was also observed for etoposide, carboplatin, cisplatin, and daunorubicin (ANOVA, P > 0.05). WRN expression also did not vary across genotypes (ANOVA, P = 0.37).Conclusion: These results suggest that this nonsynonymous variant has relatively normal function at the cellular level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thymidylate synthase (TS), an essential enzyme in DNA synthesis, is a target for the fluoropyrimidines, an important group of antineoplastic agents used widely in the treatment of head and neck cancer.Purpose: We evaluated relationships between the level and/or pattern of tumor TS expression and response to fluorouracil (5-FU)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.Methods: Tumor specimens from 86 patients were available for this retrospective analysis. The patients were enrolled in four consecutive phase II studies that tested combinations of 5-FU, leucovorin, and cisplatin with or without added methotrexate plus piritrexim or interferon alfa-2b (IFN alpha-2b). TS protein expression in the tumors was assessed by use of the TS 106 monoclonal antibody and standard immunohistochemical staining techniques. TS immunostaining was classified according to its level of intensity (TS 0-1 = low, TS 2 = intermediate, and TS 3 = high) and according to its extent (focal pattern = less than 25% of tumor cells positive; diffuse pattern = greater than or equal to 25% of tumor cells positive). Data from 79 patients were available for an analysis of tumor TS expression and patient/tumor characteristics; 70 patients were assessable for their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Results: There was a statistically significant association between the level of tumor TS expression and the degree of tumor differentiation; a higher proportion of patients whose tumors exhibited TS 0-1 immunostaining had undifferentiated or poorly differentiated tumors than patients whose tumors exhibited TS 2 or TS 3 immunostaining (P = .04, Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test). Among the 70 patients who were assessable for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, TS 3 tumor immunostaining was associated with a lower rate of complete response (i.e., complete disappearance of clinically detectable disease for a minimum of 4 weeks from time of initial determination) than was TS 2 or TS 0-1 immunostaining, but this association was not statistically significant (P = .09, exact trend test); among the 39 patients who were treated with regimens that included 5-FU, leucovorin, cisplatin, and IFN alpha-2b, this inverse association between TS immunostaining intensity and response was statistically significant (P = .02, exact trend test). Tumor TS immunostaining intensity and overall survival were not found to be associated. Patients with tumors exhibiting a focal pattern of TS immunostaining have experienced significantly longer survival than patients with tumors exhibiting a diffuse pattern; for the 53 patients with diffuse tumor TS immunostaining, the median survival was 24.7 months, whereas the median survival has not yet been reached for the 22 patients with focal tumor TS immunostaining (P = .04, two-tailed logrank test). However, the survival advantage for the focal versus diffuse TS immunostaining pattern was limited to patients whose tumors also exhibited a TS 3 level of immunostaining intensity.Conclusions and Implications: Characterization of tumor TS expression may be of value in identifying patients with advanced head and neck cancer who would benefit from fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The combination of irinotecan and erlotinib has been evaluated in clinical trials, although toxicity has been significant. We aimed to investigate the effect of erlotinib on SN-38 glucuronidation and the association between UGT1A polymorphisms and SN-38 glucuronidation activity in the presence of erlotinib. The inhibitory effect of erlotinib on SN-38 glucuronidation was determined by measuring the formation rates for SN-38 glucuronide, using recombinant human UGT1A1, pooled human liver microsomes (HLMs) and 52 Caucasian liver microsomes in the absence or presence of erlotinib. Inhibition kinetic studies were conducted. AUC ratios were used to predict the risk of potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) in vivo. Our data showed that erlotinib exhibited potent non-competitive inhibition against SN-38 glucuronidation in pooled HLMs and UGT1A1. Using the physiological and pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from the literature, we estimated the in vivo concentrations of unbound erlotinib available for UGT1A1 active site and thus the AUC ratios of SN-38 were also quantitatively predicted. It is estimated that erlotinib administered at 50mg/day or higher doses may result in at least a 24% increase in SN-38 AUC. Significant correlations were observed between SN-38 glucuronidation activity in the presence of erlotinib and UGT1A1*28 in 52 Caucasian liver microsomes. Our results suggest that erlotinib is a potent inhibitor of SN-38 glucuronidation via UGT1A1 inhibition. The coadministration of erlotinib with irinotecan may result in clinically significant DDI. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism correlates with erlotinib's effect on SN-38 glucuronidation. The present findings shed light on the development and optimisation of combinations involving irinotecan and erlotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opportunities to decrease the toxicity and cost of approved treatment regimens with lower dose, less frequent, or shorter duration alternative regimens have been limited by the perception that alternatives must be non-inferior to approved regimens. Non-inferiority trials are large and expensive to do, because they must show statistically that the alternative and approved therapies differ in a single outcome, by a margin far smaller than that required to demonstrate superiority. Non-inferiority's flaws are manifest: it ignores variability expected to occur with repeated evaluation of the approved therapy, fails to recognise that a trial of similar design will be labelled as superiority or non-inferiority depending on whether it is done prior to or after initial registration of the approved treatment, and relegates endpoints such as toxicity and cost. For example, while a less toxic and less costly regimen of 3 months duration would typically be required to demonstrate efficacy that is non-inferior to that of a standard regimen of 6 months to displace it, the longer duration therapy has no such obligation to prove its superiority. This situation is the tyranny of the non-inferiority trial: its statistics perpetuate less cost-effective regimens, which are not patient-centred, even when less intensive therapies confer survival benefits nearly identical to those of the standard, by placing a disproportionately large burden of proof on the alternative. This approach is illogical. We propose that the designation of trials as superiority or non-inferiority be abandoned, and that randomised, controlled trials should henceforth be described simply as "comparative"., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DAG reports consulting fees from, and holds stock in, Vivio Health (a drug cost management company). MB reports stock ownership in the International Drug Development Institute (IDDI). MdB reports employment in IDDI. MJR reports consulting fees from Accord, Actavis, Alembic, Apotex, Argentum Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Aurobindo, Ayala Pharma, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bluebird bio, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Cantex Pharmaceuticals, Cerona Therapeutics, Cipla, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Eagle Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Emerson Lake Safety EQRx, Fresenius Karbi, Hetero Labs, Mereo, MSN, Mylan, Natco, Oscotec, Sandoz, Shilpa, T3 Pharmaceuticals, and Teva; royalties from Mayo Medical Laboratories; and institutional grants from Arnold Ventures and AbbVie. GWS reports consulting fees from EBSCO Information Systems and Vivio Health, holds stock in Vivio Health, and has filed patents (held by his institution) for “Methods in dose optimization” and “Low-dose tocilizumab in viral infections”. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

This article reviews the implementation challenges to the American Society of Clinical Oncology's ethical framework for including research biopsies in oncology clinical trials. The primary challenges to implementation relate to the definitions of secondary endpoints, the scientific and regulatory framework, and the incentive structure that encourages inclusion of biopsies. Principles of research stewardship require that the clinical trials community correctly articulate the scientific goals of any research biopsies, especially those that are required for the patient to enroll on a trial and receive an investigational agent. Furthermore, it is important to sufficiently justify the characterization of secondary (as distinguished from exploratory) endpoints, protect the interest of research participants, and report accurate and complete information to ClinicalTrials.gov and the published literature., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: L.A.L. and E.G.-M. declare no potential conflicts of interest. J.P.—GSK, employment (spouse). M.J.R.—Stock and Other Ownership Interests: SAB Biotherapeutics; Honoraria: Emerson Lake Safety; Consulting or Advisory Role: Aptevo Therapeutics, Apotex, Genentech, Arvinas, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Oncovalent Therapeutics, EQRx, Bluebird Bio, Bayer, Cantex Pharmaceuticals, Eagle Pharmaceuticals, and EMD Serono; Research Funding: AbbVie (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Xencor (Inst), Corvus Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Incyte (Inst); Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalties related to UGT1A1 genotyping for irinotecan, royalties related to UGT1A1 genotyping for irinotecan (Inst), Provisional patent application for method of treating viral pneumonitis with low-dose tocilizumab (Inst); Expert Testimony: Multiple generic companies (defendants in patent litigation); Other Relationship: Credit Suisse, Optimal Cancer Care Alliance (OCCA), and William Blair.