Search

Rare neurological diseases as a whole share peculiar features as motor and/or cognitive impairment, an elevated disability burden, a frequently chronic course and, in present times, scarcity of therapeutic options. The rarity of those conditions hampers both the identification of significant prognostic outcome measures, and the development of novel therapeutic approaches and clinical trials. Collection of objective clinical data through digital devices can support diagnosis, care, and therapeutic research. We provide an overview on recent developments in the field of digital tools applied to rare neurological diseases, both in the care setting and as providers of outcome measures in clinical trials in a representative subgroup of conditions, including ataxias, hereditary spastic paraplegias, motoneuron diseases and myopathies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: People with rare neurological diseases (RNDs) often experience symptoms related to movement disorders, requiring a multidisciplinary approach, including rehabilitation. Telemedicine applied to rehabilitation and symptom monitoring may be suitable to ensure treatment consistency and personalized intervention. The objective of this scoping review aimed to emphasize the potential role of telerehabilitation and teleassessment in managing movement disorders within RNDs. By providing a systematic overview of the available literature, we sought to highlight potential interventions, outcomes, and critical issues. Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, IEEE, and Scopus up to March 2024. Two inclusion criteria were followed: (1) papers focusing on telerehabilitation and teleassessment and (2) papers dealing with movement disorders in RNDs. Results: Eighteen papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main interventions were home-based software and training programs, exergames, wearable sensors, smartphone applications, virtual reality and digital music players for telerehabilitation; wearable sensors, mobile applications, and patient home video for teleassessment. Key findings revealed positive outcomes in gait, balance, limb disability, and in remote monitoring. Limitations include small sample sizes, short intervention durations, and the lack of standardized protocols. Conclusion: This review highlighted the potential of telerehabilitation and teleassessment in addressing movement disorders within RNDs. Data indicate that these modalities may play a major role in supporting conventional programs. Addressing limitations through multicenter studies, longer-term follow-ups, and standardized protocols is essential. These measures are essential for improving remote rehabilitation and assessment, contributing to an improved quality of life for people with RNDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rare neurological diseases include a vast group of heterogenous syndromes with primary impairment(s) in the peripheral and/or central nervous systems. Such rare disorders may have overlapping phenotypes, despite their distinct genetic etiology. One unique aspect of rare neurological diseases is their potential common association with altered epigenetic mechanisms. Epigenetic mechanisms include regulatory processes that control gene expression and cellular phenotype without changing the composition of the corresponding DNA sequences. Epigenetic factors include three types of proteins, the "readers, writers, and erasers" of DNA and DNA-bound proteins. Thus, epigenetic impairments of many neurological diseases may contribute to their pathology and manifested phenotypes. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive review on the general etiology of selected rare neurological diseases, that include Rett Syndrome, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome, Huntington's disease, and Angelman syndrome, with respect to their associated aberrant epigenetic mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background In 2017, the German Academy for Rare Neurological Diseases (Deutsche Akademie für Seltene Neurologische Erkrankungen; DASNE) was founded to pave the way for an optimized personalized management of patients with rare neurological diseases (RND) in all age groups. Since then a dynamic national network for rare neurological disorders has been established comprising renowned experts in neurology, pediatric neurology, (neuro-) genetics and neuroradiology. DASNE has successfully implemented case presentations and multidisciplinary discussions both at yearly symposia and monthly virtual case conferences, as well as further educational activities covering a broad spectrum of interdisciplinary expertise associated with RND. Here, we present recommendation statements for optimized personalized management of patients with RND, which have been developed and reviewed in a structured Delphi process by a group of experts. Methods An interdisciplinary group of 37 RND experts comprising DASNE experts, patient representatives, as well as healthcare professionals and managers was involved in the Delphi process. First, an online collection was performed of topics considered relevant for optimal patient care by the expert group. Second, a two-step Delphi process was carried out to rank the importance of the selected topics. Small interdisciplinary working groups then drafted recommendations. In two consensus meetings and one online review round these recommendations were finally consented. Results 38 statements were consented and grouped into 11 topics: health care structure, core neurological expertise and core mission, interdisciplinary team composition, diagnostics, continuous care and therapy development, case conferences, exchange / cooperation between Centers for Rare Diseases and other healthcare partners, patient advocacy group, databases, translation and health policy. Conclusions This German interdisciplinary Delphi expert panel developed consented recommendations for optimal care of patients with RND in a structured Delphi process. These represent a basis for further developments and adjustments in the health care system to improve care for patients with RND and their families.

Abstract One of the most relevant challenges for healthcare providers during the COVID– 19 pandemic has been assuring the continuity of care to patients with complex health needs such as people living with rare diseases (RDs). The COVID–19 pandemic accelerated the healthcare sector’s digital transformation agenda. The delivery of telemedicine services instead of many face-to-face procedures has been expanded and, many healthcare services not directly related to COVID-19 treatments shifted online remotely. Many hospitals, specialist centres, patients and families started to use telemedicine because they were forced to. This trend could directly represent a good practice on how care services could be organized and continuity of care could be ensured for patients. If done properly, it could boast improved patient outcomes and become a post COVID-19 major shift in the care paradigm. There is a fragmented stakeholders spectrum, as many questions arise on: how is e-health interacting with ‘traditional’ healthcare providers; about the role of the European Reference Networks (ERNs); if remote care can retain a human touch and stay patient centric. The manuscript is one of the results of the European Brain Council (EBC) Value of Treatment research project on rare brain disorders focusing on progressive ataxias, dystonia and phenylketonuria with the support of Academic Partners and in collaboration with European Reference Networks (ERNs) experts, applying empirical evidence from different European countries. The main purpose of this work is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of care for ataxias, dystonia and phenylketonuria (PKU) in Europe. The analysis carried out makes it possible to highlight the critical points encountered and to learn from the best experiences. Here, we propose a scoping review that investigates this topic, focusing on continuity of care and novel methods (e.g., digital approaches) used to reduce the care disruption. This scoping review was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) standards. This work showed that the implementation of telemedicine services was the main measure that healthcare providers (HCPs) put in place and adopted for mitigating the effects of disruption or discontinuity of the healthcare services of people with rare neurological diseases and with neurometabolic disorders in Europe.

Background: Transition from child-centered to adult-centered healthcare is a gradual process that addresses the medical, psychological, and educational needs of young people in the management of their autonomy in making decisions about their health and their future clinical assistance. This transfer is challenging across all chronic diseases but can be particularly arduous in rare neurological conditions. Aim: To describe the current practice on the transition process for young patients in centers participating in the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND). Methods: Members of the ERN-RND working group developed a questionnaire considering child-to-adult transition issues and procedures in current clinical practice. The questionnaire included 20 questions and was sent to members of the health care providers (HCPs) participating in the network. Results: Twenty ERN-RND members (75% adult neurologists; 25% pediatricians; 5% nurses or study coordinators) responded to the survey, representing 10 European countries. Transition usually occurs between 16 and 18 years of age, but 55% of pediatric HCPs continue to care for their patients until they reach 40 years of age or older. In 5/20 ERN-RND centers, a standardized procedure managing transition is currently adopted, whereas in the remaining centers, the transition from youth to adult service is usually assisted by pediatricians as part of their clinical practice. Conclusions: This survey demonstrated significant variations in clinical practice between different centers within the ERN-RND network. It provided valuable data on existing transition programs and highlighted key challenges in managing transitions for patients with rare neurological disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rare neurological diseases include a vast group of heterogenous syndromes with primary impairment(s) in the peripheral and/or central nervous systems. Such rare disorders may have overlapping phenotypes, despite their distinct genetic etiology. One unique aspect of rare neurological diseases is their potential common association with altered epigenetic mechanisms. Epigenetic mechanisms include regulatory processes that control gene expression and cellular phenotype without changing the composition of the corresponding DNA sequences. Epigenetic factors include three types of proteins, the “readers, writers, and erasers” of DNA and DNA-bound proteins. Thus, epigenetic impairments of many neurological diseases may contribute to their pathology and manifested phenotypes. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive review on the general etiology of selected rare neurological diseases, that include Rett Syndrome, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome, Huntington’s disease, and Angelman syndrome, with respect to their associated aberrant epigenetic mechanisms.

Childhood dementia is a devastating and under-recognized group of disorders with a high level of unmet need. Typically monogenic in origin, this collective of individual neurodegenerative conditions are defined by a progressive impairment of neurocognitive function, presenting in childhood and adolescence. This scoping review aims to clarify definitions and conceptual boundaries of childhood dementia and quantify the collective disease burden. A literature review identified conditions that met the case definition. An expert clinical working group reviewed and ratified inclusion. Epidemiological data were extracted from published literature and collective burden modelled. One hundred and seventy genetic childhood dementia disorders were identified. Of these, 25 were analysed separately as treatable conditions. Collectively, currently untreatable childhood dementia was estimated to have an incidence of 34.5 per 100 000 (1 in 2900 births), median life expectancy of 9 years and prevalence of 5.3 per 100 000 persons. The estimated number of premature deaths per year is similar to childhood cancer (0–14 years) and approximately 70% of those deaths will be prior to adulthood. An additional 49.8 per 100 000 births are attributable to treatable conditions that would cause childhood dementia if not diagnosed early and stringently treated. A relational database of the childhood dementia disorders has been created and will be continually updated as new disorders are identified (https://knowledgebase.childhooddementia.org/). We present the first comprehensive overview of monogenic childhood dementia conditions and their collective epidemiology. Unifying these conditions, with consistent language and definitions, reinforces motivation to advance therapeutic development and health service supports for this significantly disadvantaged group of children and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We refine the clinical spectrum of FOXG1 syndrome and expand genotype–phenotype correlations through evaluation of 122 individuals enrolled in an international patient registry. Methods The FOXG1 syndrome online patient registry allows for remote collection of caregiver-reported outcomes. Inclusion required documentation of a (likely) pathogenic variant in FOXG1. Caregivers were administered a questionnaire to evaluate clinical severity of core features of FOXG1 syndrome. Genotype–phenotype correlations were determined using nonparametric analyses. Results We studied 122 registry participants with FOXG1 syndrome, aged

Background: We refine the clinical spectrum of FOXG1 syndrome and expand genotype–phenotype correlations through evaluation of 122 individuals enrolled in an international patient registry. Methods: The FOXG1 syndrome online patient registry allows for remote collection of caregiver-reported outcomes. Inclusion required documentation of a (likely) pathogenic variant in FOXG1. Caregivers were administered a questionnaire to evaluate clinical severity of core features of FOXG1 syndrome. Genotype–phenotype correlations were determined using nonparametric analyses. Results: We studied 122 registry participants with FOXG1 syndrome, aged < 12 months to 24 years. Caregivers described delayed or absent developmental milestone attainment, seizures (61%), and movement disorders (58%). Participants harbouring a missense variant had a milder phenotype. Compared to individuals with gene deletions (0%) or nonsense variants (20%), missense variants were associated with more frequent attainment of sitting (73%). Further, individuals with missense variants (41%) achieved independent walking more frequently than those with gene deletions (0%) or frameshift variants (6%). Presence of epilepsy also varied by genotype and was significantly more common in those with gene deletions (81%) compared to missense variants (47%). Individuals with gene deletions were more likely to have higher seizure burden than other genotypes with 53% reporting daily seizures, even at best control. We also observed that truncations preserving the forkhead DNA binding domain were associated with better developmental outcomes. Conclusion: We refine the phenotypic spectrum of neurodevelopmental features associated with FOXG1 syndrome. We strengthen genotype-driven outcomes, where missense variants are associated with a milder clinical course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Rare diseases (RDs) are life-threatening or chronically impairing conditions that affect about 6% of the world's population. RDs are often called 'orphan' diseases, since people suffering from them attract little support from national health systems. Aim: The aim of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of, and the available laboratory examinations for, patients who were hospitalized in a tertiary referral center and finally received a diagnosis associated with a Rare Neurological Disease (RND). Materials and Methods: Patients that were hospitalized in our clinic from 1 January 2014 to 31 March 2022 and were finally diagnosed with an RND were consecutively included. The RND classification was performed according to the ORPHAcode system. Results: A total of 342 out of 11.850 (2.9%) adult patients admitted to our department during this period received a diagnosis associated with an RND. The most common diagnosis (N = 80, 23%) involved an RND presenting with dementia, followed by a motor neuron disease spectrum disorder (N = 64, 18.7%). Family history indicative of an RND was present in only 21 patients (6.1%). Fifty-five (16%) people had previously been misdiagnosed with another neurological condition. The mean time delay between disease onset and diagnosis was 4.24 ± 0.41 years. Conclusions: Our data indicate that a broad spectrum of RNDs may reach a tertiary Neurological Center after a significant delay. Moreover, our data underline the need for a network of reference centers, both at a national and international level, expected to support research on the diagnosis and treatment of RND. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rare neurological diseases contain of a great variety of different disease and difficult to diagnose and cure. In the past years, many drugs are approved for treatment of the rare diseases, bringing hope to patients. However, these drugs are usually very expensive, so clinicians and patients have to face the delimma of the accessibility and appropriate usage of these drugs. On the other hand, there are many rare diseases could be treated by cheaper drugs. However, diagnosis of those rare diseases is challenging and clinician's lacking knowledge of the rare diseases leads to delay in diagnosis. Improving the competence in early diagnosis of rare neurological diseases is essential for the patients to live a quality life.

ObjectiveTo clarify the current state of methodology of clinical trials for rare neurological diseases in children, and to provide a basis for the further optimization of the trial design.MethodsData of clinical trials for the rare neurological diseases with childhood onset (searched through https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases and www.Orpha.net) registered on the Clinicaltrils.gov from January 2010 to June 2020 was collected. Analysis on the methodology of the clinical trials were performed, focusing on initiator of the studies, multi or single research center, study design, sample size, and the endpoint using in the trial.ResultsA total of 162 clinical trials were included, covering only 7.3% (61/835) of rare neurological diseases in children. 101 (62.3%) were initiated by pharmaceutical companies, and 61 (37.7%) by investigators. Most (95.4%) of global multicenter studies were initiated by pharmaceutical companies, whereas most (70.0%) of single-center studies were initiated by investigators (χ2 = 61.635, P

Background and Objectives: Rare diseases (RDs) are life-threatening or chronically impairing conditions that affect about 6% of the world’s population. RDs are often called ‘orphan’ diseases, since people suffering from them attract little support from national health systems. Aim: The aim of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of, and the available laboratory examinations for, patients who were hospitalized in a tertiary referral center and finally received a diagnosis associated with a Rare Neurological Disease (RND). Materials and Methods: Patients that were hospitalized in our clinic from 1 January 2014 to 31 March 2022 and were finally diagnosed with an RND were consecutively included. The RND classification was performed according to the ORPHAcode system. Results: A total of 342 out of 11.850 (2.9%) adult patients admitted to our department during this period received a diagnosis associated with an RND. The most common diagnosis (N = 80, 23%) involved an RND presenting with dementia, followed by a motor neuron disease spectrum disorder (N = 64, 18.7%). Family history indicative of an RND was present in only 21 patients (6.1%). Fifty-five (16%) people had previously been misdiagnosed with another neurological condition. The mean time delay between disease onset and diagnosis was 4.24 ± 0.41 years. Conclusions: Our data indicate that a broad spectrum of RNDs may reach a tertiary Neurological Center after a significant delay. Moreover, our data underline the need for a network of reference centers, both at a national and international level, expected to support research on the diagnosis and treatment of RND.

Background: There has been increasing attention focused on the epidemiology of rare diseases (RDs) in recent years. Rare neurological diseases (RNDs) constitute a significant proportion of RDs; however, relevant research is still lacking. Methods: A list of ICD‐10 codes corresponding to RNDs was compiled using adaptations from the Orphanet Classification of Rare Diseases, and classified into rare epilepsy, movement‐related, neurocutaneous, neuroimmune, neurometabolic and neurodegenerative, neuromuscular and other RNDs. Using the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System, which holds public hospital healthcare records of Hong Kong anonymously, we calculated the prevalence and healthcare utilization of RND patients between 2014 and 2018. The list of RNDs was also used to review relevant pharmacological trials within the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform between 2009 and 2018. Results: The prevalence of RNDs in Hong Kong is 3.6 in 1,000 individuals. Patients with RNDs had frequent emergency department, outpatient and inpatient healthcare utilization. The average annual cost per patient is estimated at HKD 182,075 (€ 19,688). Different categories of RNDs showed different patterns of healthcare utilization. Moreover, there were only 677 RND‐related pharmacological trials during the study period, and no trial was found for 78% of RNDs. Conclusions: This is one of the first population studies on the prevalence and healthcare utilization patterns of RNDs, with comprehensive reviews of RND‐related pharmacological research. It shows high healthcare utilization rates among patients with RNDs, as well as a wide research gap in many RNDs. We call for better attention and tailored healthcare for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While rare diseases (RDs) are by definition of low prevalence, the total number of patients suffering from an RD is high, and the majority of them have neurologic manifestations, involving central, peripheral nerve, and muscle. In 2017, 24 European Reference Networks (ERNs), each focusing on a specific group of rare or low-prevalence complex diseases, were formed to improve the care for patients with an RD. One major aim is to have “the knowledge travel instead of the patient,” which has been put into practice by the implementation of the Clinical Patient Management System (CPMS) that enables clinicians to perform pan-European virtual consultations. The European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND) provides an infrastructure for knowledge sharing and care coordination for patients affected by a rare neurological disease (RND) involving the most common central nervous system pathological conditions. It covers the following disease groups: (i) Cerebellar Ataxias and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias; (ii) Huntington's disease and Other Choreas; (iii) Frontotemporal dementia; (iv) Dystonia, (non-epileptic) paroxysmal disorders, and Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation; (v) Leukoencephalopathies; and (vi) Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes. At the moment, it unites 32 expert centers and 10 affiliated partners in 21 European countries, as well as patient representatives, but will soon cover nearly all countries of the European Union as a result of the ongoing expansion process. Disease expert groups developed and consented on diagnostic flowcharts and disease scales to assess the different aspects of RNDs. ERN-RND has started to discuss diagnostically unclear patients in the CPMS, is one of four ERNs that serve as foundation of Solve-RD, and has established an RND training and education program. The network will facilitate trial readiness through the establishment of an ERN-RND registry with a minimal data of all patients seen at the ERN-RND centers, thus providing a unique overview of existing genotype-based cohorts. The overall aim of the ERNs is to improve access for patients with RDs to quality diagnosis, care, and treatment. Based on this objective, ERNs are monitored by the European Commission on a regular basis to provide transparency and reassurance to the RD community and the general public.

While rare diseases (RDs) are by definition of low prevalence, the total number of patients suffering from an RD is high, and the majority of them have neurologic manifestations, involving central, peripheral nerve, and muscle. In 2017, 24 European Reference Networks (ERNs), each focusing on a specific group of rare or low-prevalence complex diseases, were formed to improve the care for patients with an RD. One major aim is to have "the knowledge travel instead of the patient," which has been put into practice by the implementation of the Clinical Patient Management System (CPMS) that enables clinicians to perform pan-European virtual consultations. The European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND) provides an infrastructure for knowledge sharing and care coordination for patients affected by a rare neurological disease (RND) involving the most common central nervous system pathological conditions. It covers the following disease groups: (i) Cerebellar Ataxias and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias; (ii) Huntington's disease and Other Choreas; (iii) Frontotemporal dementia; (iv) Dystonia, (non-epileptic) paroxysmal disorders, and Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation; (v) Leukoencephalopathies; and (vi) Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes. At the moment, it unites 32 expert centers and 10 affiliated partners in 21 European countries, as well as patient representatives, but will soon cover nearly all countries of the European Union as a result of the ongoing expansion process. Disease expert groups developed and consented on diagnostic flowcharts and disease scales to assess the different aspects of RNDs. ERN-RND has started to discuss diagnostically unclear patients in the CPMS, is one of four ERNs that serve as foundation of Solve-RD, and has established an RND training and education program. The network will facilitate trial readiness through the establishment of an ERN-RND registry with a minimal data of all patients seen at the ERN-RND centers, thus providing a unique overview of existing genotype-based cohorts. The overall aim of the ERNs is to improve access for patients with RDs to quality diagnosis, care, and treatment. Based on this objective, ERNs are monitored by the European Commission on a regular basis to provide transparency and reassurance to the RD community and the general public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although migraine is generally considered an idiopathic and isolated neurological condition, it may also represent the presenting symptom of several uncommon heritable and acquired neurological diseases contributing to the recognition of such conditions. Migraine may indeed present with atypical characteristics or prolonged duration and may be associated with specific neuroradiological findings that may help in identifying the underlying condition. However, features of migraine in rare diseases are usually little known because of the lack of systematic studies. The aim of this paper is to provide clinicians with an updated review on specific clinical and neuroradiological features of migraine in uncommon neurological diseases that may be helpful to their diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, the early diagnosis of these uncommon diseases is crucial for patients' clinical management and for the implementation of therapeutic approaches aimed at targeting the underlying disease pathogenic mechanisms. Thus, when investigating patients affected by migraine, physicians should always be aware about rare causes of migraine that if misdiagnosed could seriously impact patients' outcome. Given these relevant implications, future studies specifically assessing features of migraine in uncommon diseases are mandatory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rare neurological diseases (RNDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders mainly affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems, representing almost 50% of all rare diseases; this explains why neurologists are very often involved in their diagnosis, treatment and research. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively describe the awareness of RNDs among the neurological community of the Italian Society of Neurology (SIN). A survey of the Italian Neurogenetics and Rare diseases group of the SIN, similar to what was submitted to the members of the EAN Task Force on Rare Neurologic Diseases and to EAN Panels Scientific Committee Management Groups, was launched in January 2019 in order to verify the specific Italian situations and possibly the regional differences. Answers were collected online. We observed that Italian Members of the SIN Neurogenetics and Rare Neurologic Diseases Scientific Group are well aware of the burden posed by RNDs but at the national and regional level, the relative awareness is sketchy and disparate. Although many national initiatives have been undertaken to facilitate the diagnosis and management in Italy, our survey reveals that much works has to be done in supporting RNDs patients, including a deeper collaboration between politics, universities and all stakeholders in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Therefore, it is now time to accelerate on the field; we suggest the following key priorities to be achieved in the next 3 years: Key Priority 1: Ensure European patients get the right diagnosis faster wherever they live, including prenatal diagnosis and newborn screening for the treatable RNDs. Neurogenetics, rare diseases, rare neurological diseases, awareness Keywords: awareness; neurogenetics; rare diseases; rare neurological diseases EN awareness neurogenetics rare diseases rare neurological diseases 1553 1554 2 05/09/23 20230601 NES 230601 On 28 February, we observed Worldwide Rare Diseases Day, a full day dedicated to raising awareness and generating concrete changes for the 300 million people worldwide living with a rare disease, their families, and carers. [Extracted from the article]

Loss of sacsin, a large 520 kDa multidomain protein, causes autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of the Charlevoix-Saguenay, one of the most common childhood-onset recessive ataxias. A prominent feature is abnormal bundling of neurofilaments in many neuronal populations. This study shows the direct involvement of sacsin domains in regulating intermediate filament assembly and dynamics and identifies important domains for alleviating neurofilament bundles in neurons lacking sacsin. Peptides encoding sacsin internal repeat (SIRPT) 1, J-domains, and ubiquitin-like domain modified neurofilament assembly in vivo. The domains with chaperone homology, the SIRPT and the J-domain, had opposite effects, promoting and preventing filament assembly, respectively. In cultured Sacs-/- motor neurons, both the SIRPT1 and J-domain resolved preexisting neurofilament bundles. Increasing expression of heat shock proteins also resolved neurofilament bundles, indicating that this endogenous chaperone system can compensate to some extent for sacsin deficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is an inherited lysosomal storage disorder, leading to multisystemic manifestations and causing significant morbidity and mortality., Objective: The aim of this narrative review is to present the current and novel therapeutic strategies in FD, including symptomatic and specific treatment options., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies, including completed and ongoing randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs), prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case series and case reports that provided clinical data regarding FD treatment., Results: A multidisciplinary symptomatic treatment is recommended for FD patients, personalized according to disease manifestations and their severity. During the last two decades, FD-specific treatments, including two enzyme-replacement-therapies (agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta) and chaperone treatment with migalastat have been approved for use and allowed for symptoms' stabilization or even disease burden reduction. More therapeutic agents are currently under investigation. Substrate reduction therapies, including lucerastat and venglustat, have shown promising results in RCTs and may be used either as monotherapy or as complementary therapy to established enzymereplacement- therapies. More stable enzyme-replacement-therapy molecules that are associated with less adverse events and lower likelihood of neutralizing antibodies formation have also been developed. Ex-vivo and in-vivo gene therapy is being tested in animal models and pilot human clinical trials, with preliminary results showing a favorable safety and efficacy profile., Conclusion: The therapeutic landscape in FD appears to be actively expanding with more treatment options expected to become available in the near future, allowing for a more personalized approach in FD patients., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Objective: To clarify the current state of methodology of clinical trials for rare neurological diseases in children, and to provide a basis for the further optimization of the trial design., Methods: Data of clinical trials for the rare neurological diseases with childhood onset (searched through https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases and www.Orpha.net) registered on the Clinicaltrils.gov from January 2010 to June 2020 was collected. Analysis on the methodology of the clinical trials were performed, focusing on initiator of the studies, multi or single research center, study design, sample size, and the endpoint using in the trial., Results: A total of 162 clinical trials were included, covering only 7.3% (61/835) of rare neurological diseases in children. 101 (62.3%) were initiated by pharmaceutical companies, and 61 (37.7%) by investigators. Most (95.4%) of global multicenter studies were initiated by pharmaceutical companies, whereas most (70.0%) of single-center studies were initiated by investigators ( χ 2  = 61.635, P  < 0.001). Of the 162 trials, 74 (45.7%) were open-label single-arm trials, 68 (42.0%) were randomized double-blind parallel controlled trials (RCT), 12 (7.4%) were randomized crossover trials. Most of RCTs (73.5%) and 54.1% of open-label single-arm trials were initiated by pharmaceutical companies. The proportion of RCTs in clinical trials for diseases with a prevalence of ≥1/10,000 (62.5%) was higher than that in diseases with prevalence ≤1/1,000,000 (12.0%) or 1/1,000,000~1/10,000 (43.1%) ( χ 2  = 14.790, P  = 0.001). The median expected sample size of the studies was 34 (4-500). 132 (132/162, 81.5%) studies enrolled fewer than 100 cases. Diseases with a prevalence of ≥1/10,000 had significantly larger sample sizes than other prevalence classes ( P  < 0.001, P  = 0.003)., Conclusions: There were few clinical trials targeting on treatment of rare neurological diseases in children. Trials on rare diseases used fewer participants, and high-quality randomized controlled trials were less common. It is necessary to conduct global multicenter recruitment and choose optimal study designs to improve the level of evidence in clinical trials on rare diseases., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2022 Chang, Zhang, Jiang, Shang and Wu.)

Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapies present a promising disease-modifying treatment approach for rare neurological diseases (RNDs). However, the current focus is on "more common" RNDs, leaving a large share of RND patients still without prospect of disease-modifying treatments. In response to this gap, n-of-1 ASO treatment approaches are targeting ultrarare or even private variants. While highly attractive, this emerging, academia-driven field of ultimately individualized precision medicine is in need of systematic guidance and standards, which will allow global scaling of this approach. We provide here genetic, regulatory, and ethical perspectives for preparing n-of-1 ASO treatments and research programs, with a specific focus on the European context. By example of splice modulating ASOs, we outline genetic criteria for variant prioritization, chart the regulatory field of n-of-1 ASO treatment development in Europe, and propose an ethically informed classification for n-of-1 ASO treatment strategies and level of outcome assessments. To accommodate the ethical requirements of both individual patient benefit and knowledge gain, we propose a stronger integration of patient care and clinical research when developing novel n-of-1 ASO treatments: each single trial of therapy should inherently be driven to generate generalizable knowledge, be registered in a ASO treatment registry, and include assessment of generic outcomes, which allow aggregated analysis across n-of-1 trials of therapy.

Rare neurological diseases are a heterogeneous group corresponding approximately to 50% of all rare diseases. Neurologists are among the main specialists involved in their diagnostic investigation. At the moment, a consensus guideline on which neurologists may base clinical suspicion is not available. Moreover, neurologists need guidance with respect to screening investigations that may be performed. In this respect, biomarker research has emerged as a particularly active field due to its potential applications in clinical practice. With respect to autoimmune demyelinating diseases of the Central Nervous System (CNS), although these diseases occur in the frame of organ-specific autoimmunity, pathology of the disease itself is orchestrated among several anatomical and functional compartments. The differential diagnosis is broad and includes, but is not limited to, rare neurological diseases. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) needs to be differentially diagnosed from rare MS variants, Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM), the range of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSDs), Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG) antibody disease and other systemic inflammatory diseases. Diagnostic biomarkers may facilitate timely diagnosis and proper disease management, preventing disease exacerbation due to misdiagnosis and false treatment. In this review, we will describe advances in biomarker research with respect to rare neuroinflammatory disease of the CNS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]