Search

A comprehensive 8-drug metabolic cocktail was designed to simultaneously target 6 Cytochrome P450 enzymes and 2 membrane transporters. This study aimed to assess the pre-absorption risk of this new metabolic cocktail which contained metoprolol, caffeine, midazolam, pravastatin, flurbiprofen, omeprazole, digoxin and montelukast. This paper describes a systematic approach to understand whether the co-administration of the 8 selected drug products, i.e., the physical mixing of these products in the human gastro-intestinal environment, will create any issue that may interfere with the individual drug dissolution which in turns modify the total amount or timing of their availability for absorption. The evaluation consisted of two steps. An initial evaluation was based on theoretical understanding of the physicochemical properties of the drugs and the gastro intestinal environment, followed by in vitro dissolution tests. The results indicated that the designer 8-drug cocktail has acceptable pre-absorption compatibility when dosed simultaneously, and recommended the progression of the cocktail into clinical validation study.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Under homeostatic conditions, sequential cleavage of amyloid precursor protein by β-site cleaving enzyme and γ-secretase forms the common Aβ isoforms, Aβ1–38, Aβ1–40, and Aβ1–42. • However, in the pathological Alzheimer's disease (AD) state, Aβ clearance is decreased nearly 30%. As such, γ-secretase is a promising drug target for AD therapy, as a decrease in its enzymatic activity has the potential to reduce Aβ levels and modify disease. • In contrast, current treatments for AD provide only short term symptomatic relief. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • Unique among previous studies of γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs), such as semagacestat and begacestat, our results showed that avagacestat, an oral GSI in clinical development for the disease-modifying treatment of AD, decreased Aβ1–40 plasma concentrations and was well-tolerated in both young and elderly subjects, with adverse events being predominantly mild to moderate in severity. AIM To evaluate the single dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary tolerability of the γ-secretase inhibitor BMS-708163 (avagacestat) in young and elderly men and women. METHODS All subjects received double-blinded administration of a single 50 mg dose of avagacestat in capsule form or matching placebo. Main evaluations included pharmacokinetics, safety, plasma amyloid-β (Aβ)1–40 concentratios and exploration of Notch biomarkers. RESULTS Avagacestat 50 mg capsule was well tolerated and rapidly absorbed among young and elderly subjects, with a median tmax between 1 and 2 h post dose and an average half-life between 41 and 71 h. In general, subjects aged 75 years or more had higher AUC(0,∞) values than those aged less than 75 years. An exploratory analysis of Aβ1–40 serum concentrations showed a pattern of decreasing concentrations over the first 4–6 h followed by a rise above baseline that was maintained until the end of the assessment period. Adverse events were generally mild, occurring more frequently in elderly subjects, with no observed difference between subjects receiving avagacestat and placebo. No dose limiting gastrointestinal effects of avagacestat were observed and exploratory biomarkers of Notch inhibition did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS The favourable safety profile and pharmacokinetic effects of avagacestat in this study support its continued development, especially in the target population of elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease.

Reducing the maximum plasma concentration whilst maintaining the exposure was shown to ameliorate adverse events following the oral administration of 6-hydroxybuspirone. This observation, along with a desire to provide for once daily dosing of this compound, provided the basis for the development of an extended release formulation. Hydrophilic matrix tablets based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and containing citric acid to provide for an acid microenvironment were prepared and evaluated by in vitro drug release studies and in vivo pharmacokinetic and scintigraphic studies using samarium oxide (153Sm) labelled dosage forms. The dosage forms were found to release the contained drug by a predominantly diffusion mechanism and the release rate was relatively independent of environmental pH. Following administration of the extended release formulations to volunteers, comparative pharmacokinetic data indicated that the extended release formulations provided for a reduction in the maximum plasma concentration of 64–70% relative to that provided by the same dose given as an oral solution, whilst maintaining exposure relative to the oral solution. By examination of absorption curves derived by Wagner-Nelson analysis of pharmacokinetic data it was noted that drug release in vivo correlated well with drug release observed in vitro and no marked change in rate of absorption was noted when dosage forms were located in and releasing drug in the colon. The robust control of drug release seen in vitro translated to a good in vivo performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The concentration of amyloid β (Aβ) peptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, and has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of γ-secretase inhibition. Avagacestat is a selective γ-secretase inhibitor in development for the treatment of AD. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effects of single oral doses of avagacestat on the CSF Aβ concentrations in healthy male subjects. Secondary objectives included single-dose pharmacokinetics in CSF and plasma, safety and tolerability.This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-dose study. Healthy male subjects were assigned to one of three sequential avagacestat dose panels (50, 200 and 400 mg) or placebo as single oral doses.34 subjects were enrolled. Administration of a single dose of 200 or 400 mg of avagacestat resulted in a marked decrease in CSF Aβ(1-38), Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) concentrations vs placebo; with smaller decreases observed in the 50 mg dose group. Avagacestat was quickly absorbed into the systemic circulation, with a mean time to reach maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) of approximately 1-2 h, and a CSF t(max) of approximately 3 h. Adverse events were uncommon and occurred with similar frequency in the placebo and avagacestat groups.Avagacestat was safe, well tolerated, and resulted in a notable decrease in CSF Aβ concentrations, suggestive of γ-secretase inhibition. The results warrant further clinical study in patients with AD.

A methodology for the accurate calculation and mitigation of isotopic interferences in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays and its application in supporting microdose absolute bioavailability studies are reported for the first time. For simplicity, this calculation methodology and the strategy to minimize the isotopic interference are demonstrated using a simple molecule entity, then applied to actual development drugs. The exact isotopic interferences calculated with this methodology were often much less than the traditionally used, overestimated isotopic interferences simply based on the molecular isotope abundance. One application of the methodology is the selection of a stable isotopically labeled internal standard (SIL-IS) for an LC-MS/MS bioanalytical assay. The second application is the selection of an SIL analogue for use in intravenous (i.v.) microdosing for the determination of absolute bioavailability. In the case of microdosing, the traditional approach of calculating isotopic interferences can result in selecting a labeling scheme that overlabels the i.v.-dosed drug or leads to incorrect conclusions on the feasibility of using an SIL drug and analysis by LC-MS/MS. The methodology presented here can guide the synthesis by accurately calculating the isotopic interferences when labeling at different positions, using different selective reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions or adding more labeling positions. This methodology has been successfully applied to the selection of the labeled i.v.-dosed drugs for use in two microdose absolute bioavailability studies, before initiating the chemical synthesis. With this methodology, significant time and cost saving can be achieved in supporting microdose absolute bioavailability studies with stable labeled drugs.

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), a mediator of stress response, alters gastrointestinal (GI) functions. Stress-related changes in colonic motility are blocked by selective CRF1 receptor antagonists. Our aim was to assess whether modulation of central and peripheral CRF1 receptors affects colonic transit and bowel function in female patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-wk study evaluated the effects of oral pexacerfont (BMS-562086), a selective CRF1 receptor antagonist, 25 and 100 mg qd, on GI and colonic transit of solids [by validated scintigraphy with primary end point colonic geometric center (GC) at 24 h] and bowel function (by validated daily diaries) in 39 women with D-IBS. The 100-mg dose was comparable to a dose that inhibited colonic motility in stressed rats. Treatment effects were compared by analysis of covariance with baseline colonic transit as covariate. The study had 80% power (α = 0.05) to detect clinically meaningful (26%) differences in colonic transit. Thirty-nine of 55 patients fulfilled eligibility criteria (9 screen failures, 5 baseline GC24 outside prespecified range). At baseline, three treatment groups had comparable age, body mass index, and GC 24 h. Significant effects of pexacerfont relative to placebo were not detected on colonic GC24 ( P = 0.53), gastric emptying, orocecal transit, ascending colon emptying half-time, and stool frequency, consistency, and ease of passage. No safety issues were identified. We conclude that in women with D-IBS, pexacerfont, 25 or 100 mg qd, does not significantly alter colonic or other regional transit or bowel function. The role of central and peripheral CRF1 receptors in bowel function in D-IBS requires further study.

Brasofensine is an inhibitor of the synaptic dopamine transporter. These studies were conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics, absolute bioavailability, disposition, and metabolism of brasofensine after i.v. and/or p.o. administrations of [(14)C]brasofensine in rats (1.5 mg/kg i.v., 4 mg/kg p.o.) and monkeys (4 mg i.v., 12 mg p.o.) and humans (50 mg p.o.). Brasofensine was rapidly absorbed after p.o. administration in rats and monkeys, with peak plasma concentrations occurring 0.5 to 1 h but 3 to 8 h for brasofensine in humans. Plasma terminal elimination half-lives were approximately 2 h in rats, approximately 4 h in monkeys, and approximately 24 h in humans. Total body clearance and steady-state volume of distribution values were 199 ml/min/kg and 24 l/kg, respectively, in the rat and 32 ml/min/kg and 46 l/kg, respectively, in the monkey. Absolute bioavailability was 7% in rats and 0.8% in monkeys. After a single p.o. dose, urinary excretion of radioactivity accounted for 20% of the administered dose in rats, 70% in monkeys, and 86% in humans, with the remainder excreted into the feces. Brasofensine had extensive first-pass metabolism following p.o. administration in humans, monkeys, and rats. It primarily underwent O- and N-demethylation and isomerization. Some of the desmethyl metabolites were further converted to glucuronides. These primary metabolites and glucuronides of demethyl brasofensine (M1 and M2) were major circulating metabolites in humans and were also observed in rat and monkey plasma.

The pharmacokinetics and in vivo potency of 6-hydroxybuspirone (6-OH-buspirone), a major metabolite of buspirone, were investigated. The plasma clearance (47.3 +/- 3.5 ml/min/kg), volume of distribution (2.6 +/- 0.3 l/kg), and half-life (1.2 +/- 0.2 h) of 6-OH-buspirone in rats were similar to those for buspirone. Bioavailability was higher for 6-OH-buspirone (19%) compared with that for buspirone (1.4%). After intravenous infusions to steady-state levels in plasma, 6-OH-buspirone and buspirone increased 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)(1A) receptor occupancy in a concentration-dependent manner with EC(50) values of 1.0 +/- 0.3 and 0.38 +/- 0.06 microM in the dorsal raphe and 4.0 +/- 0.6 and 1.5 +/- 0.3 microM in the hippocampus, respectively. Both compounds appeared to be approximately 4-fold more potent in occupying presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in the dorsal raphe than the postsynaptic receptors in the hippocampus. Oral dosing of buspirone in rats resulted in exposures (area under the concentration-time profile) of 6-OH-buspirone and 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP), another major metabolite of buspirone, that were approximately 12 (6-OH-buspirone)- and 49 (1-PP)-fold higher than the exposure of the parent compound. As a whole, these preclinical data suggest that 6-OH-buspirone probably contributes to the clinical efficacy of buspirone as an anxiolytic agent.

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of 6-hydroxybuspirone (6OHB) when given orally via three forms: racemate (BMS-528215), S-enantiomer (BMS-442606) and R-enantiomer (BMS-442608), versus following the administration of buspirone. A double-blind, randomized, four-period, four-treatment, crossover study balanced for residual effects in healthy subjects was conducted (n=20). Subjects received single 10 mg doses of each compound in a randomized fashion with pharmacokinetics determined over a 24 h period. There was a 4-day washout between each dosing period. All three forms of 6OHB (racemate, S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer) were well tolerated. There was nterconversion between enantiomers. The dominant enantiomer was the S-enantiomer no matter which form of 6OHB was administered. All three forms of 6OHB produced approximately 2- to 3-fold greater exposure to total 6OHB than did buspirone. All three forms produced equal exposure to 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP) which was approximately 30% less than the 1-PP exposure derived from buspirone administration. All three forms of 6OHB produced approximately 3-fold higher 6OHB:1-PP ratios and approximately 2.5-fold higher total 6OHB exposures than did buspirone administration. All compounds were well tolerated. There seemed to be no advantage of one of the enantiomers of 6OHB over the racemate. Therefore, the racemate was chosen for further clinical development.

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of a newly identified active metabolite of buspirone, 6-hydroxybuspirone (6OHB), over the therapeutic dose range of buspirone. A 26-day, open-label, nonrandomized, single-sequence, dose-escalation study in normal healthy volunteers was conducted (N = 13). Subjects received escalating doses of buspirone with each dose administered for 5 days starting at a dose of 5 mg twice daily and increasing up to 30 mg twice daily. Plasma concentrations of 6OHB were approximately 40-fold greater than those of buspirone. 6OHB was rapidly formed following buspirone administration, and exposure increased proportionally with buspirone dose. Further research regarding the safety and efficacy of 6OHB itself is warranted.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of the dopamine transporter antagonist brasofensine (BMS-204756) in patients with Parkinson's disease receiving levodopa/carbidopa treatment. METHODS: A 4-period crossover study was performed in 8 men (mean age 66 y) with moderate Parkinson's disease (Hoehn—Yahr stage II—IV). A dose escalation study was used in which each patient was given a single oral dose of brasofensine 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg, which was coadministered with the patient's usual dose of levodopa/carbidopa. RESULTS: The maximum concentration (Cmax) values of brasofensine observed in plasma after oral administration were 0.35, 0.82, 2.14, and 3.27 ng/mL for the 0.5-, 1-, 2-, and 4-mg doses, respectively; these concentrations occurred 4 hours (time to Cmax) after administration in all cases. Exposure to brasofensine (based on AUC0-∞) increased at a rate greater than proportional to dose. Based on the motor performance subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, no change in patient disability was observed at any dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Brasofensine was safe and well tolerated in the patient cohort studied at daily doses of up to 4 mg. Adverse events were generally mild in intensity, and included headache, insomnia, phlebitis, dizziness, ecchymosis, and vomiting.

A 21-day, open-label, multisite, dose escalation study comprising three demographic groups (children, adolescents, and adults) was performed to determine the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of orally administered buspirone. Thirteen children and 12 adolescents with anxiety disorder and 14 normal healthy adults were escalated from 5 to 30 mg buspirone bid over the 3-week study. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that buspirone was rapidly absorbed in all study groups, reaching peak levels at about 1 hour after administration. Peak plasma buspirone concentrations (C max ) were highest in children and lowest in adults at all three dose levels (7.5, 15, 30 mg bid). However, 1-pyrimidinylpiperazine (1-PP), the primary metabolite of buspirone, exhibited a different plasma concentration-time profile; C max was significantly higher in children than in either adolescents or adults at all concentrations. In addition, TAUC 0-T for 1-PP was significantly higher in the children cohort relative to adolescents and adults. Buspirone was generally safe and well tolerated at doses up to 30 mg bid in adolescents and adults and most of the children. The most frequently reported adverse events in children and adolescents were lightheadedness (68%), headache (48%), and dyspepsia (20%); 2 children withdrew from the study at the higher doses (15 mg and 30 mg bid) due to adverse effects. In adults, the most common adverse effect was somnolence (21.4%); lightheadedness, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were also reported, although these were mild in intensity.

A hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is the accumulation of brain amyloid β-peptide (Aβ), generated by γ-secretase-mediated cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). Therefore, γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) may lower brain Aβ and offer a potential new approach to treat AD. As γ-secretase also cleaves Notch proteins, GSIs can have undesirable effects due to interference with Notch signaling. Avagacestat (BMS-708163) is a GSI developed for selective inhibition of APP over Notch cleavage. Avagacestat inhibition of APP and Notch cleavage was evaluated in cell culture by measuring levels of Aβ and human Notch proteins. In rats, dogs, and humans, selectivity was evaluated by measuring plasma blood concentrations in relation to effects on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ levels and Notch-related toxicities. Measurements of Notch-related toxicity included goblet cell metaplasia in the gut, marginal-zone depletion in the spleen, reductions in B cells, and changes in expression of the Notch-regulated hairy and enhancer of split homolog-1 from blood cells. In rats and dogs, acute administration of avagacestat robustly reduced CSF Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels similarly. Chronic administration in rats and dogs, and 28-day, single- and multiple-ascending-dose administration in healthy human subjects caused similar exposure-dependent reductions in CSF Aβ40. Consistent with the 137-fold selectivity measured in cell culture, we identified doses of avagacestat that reduce CSF Aβ levels without causing Notch-related toxicities. Our results demonstrate the selectivity of avagacestat for APP over Notch cleavage, supporting further evaluation of avagacestat for AD therapy.

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of nefazodone (NEF). A group of 24 healthy adult male volunteers received a single 200 mg dose of NEF under fasting conditions as well as 5 min after a high-fat breakfast. There was a 1 week washout between treatments. Serial blood samples were collected for 48 h after dosing and assayed by a validated HPLC method for NEF and the metabolites hydroxynefazodone (HO-NEF), m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), and triazoledione (dione). The mean (SD) peak concentration (Cmax) for NEF was not affected by food and was 416 (220) ng mL-1 and 446 (271) ng mL-1 after the fed and fasted treatments, respectively. The median time to reach Cmax (Tmax) was also unaffected by food and was 2 h for both treatments. However, the mean (SD) area under the curve (AUC) was significantly reduced by food from 1815 (1017) ng h mL-1 to 1409 (695) ng h mL-1. Although there was an 18% decrease in NEF AUC when administered with food, food had no effect on Cmax and Tmax values for NEF, HO-NEF, mCPP or dione or AUC values for HO-NEF, mCPP, or dione, indicating that NEF can be administered without regard to meals.

The effect of nefazodone on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of digoxin were evaluated in an open, randomized, multiple-dose, three-way crossover study of 18 healthy male volunteers. The volunteers received nefazodone alone (200 mg twice daily), digoxin alone (0.2 mg daily), or nefazodone combined with digoxin during three 8-day treatment periods, with a single dose on the ninth day. There was a 10-day washout period between treatment periods. Coadministration of nefazodone with digoxin had no effect on the frequency and severity of adverse events compared with those observed with either drug alone. Steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of digoxin were significantly higher (15%, 29%, and 27%, respectively) after coadministration of nefazodone/digoxin than after administration of digoxin. Despite these increases, no clinically significant changes in vital signs, heart rate, or PR, QRS, and QT intervals on the electrocardiogram occurred after coadministration from those measured after digoxin monotherapy. Coadministration did not affect the pharmacokinetics of nefazodone or its metabolites (hydroxynefazodone, m-chlorophenylpiperazine, triazole dione). Because digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index, monitoring of plasma digoxin levels and appropriate adjustment of dosage are recommended when nefazodone and digoxin are administered concurrently.

The effect of nefazodone on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of theophylline was evaluated in a multiple-dose, randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind two-period crossover study in 13 patients who were undergoing theophylline therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Two treatments were administered, each for 7 days: theophylline + 200 mg nefazodone twice daily (every 12h) and theophylline+matching nefazodone placebo capsule twice daily (every 12h). Mean peak and trough plasma concentrations of theophylline ranged from 13.1 to 14.5 micrograms ml-1 and 11.6 to 14.2 micrograms ml-1, respectively, at steady-state when theophylline was administered with or without concurrent dosing of nefazodone. Similarly, the mean area under the curve for theophylline ranged from 93.5 to 103 micrograms ml-1 h. When nefazodone and theophylline were co-administered, theophylline pharmacokinetic parameters did not significantly differ from those obtained when theophylline was administered with placebo. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measurements taken when nefazodone or placebo were administered with theophylline did not differ from those obtained at baseline. The plasma concentration-time profiles for nefazodone and its metabolites were similar to those in other studies where nefazodone was administered alone. Since nefazodone did not affect the pharmacokinetics or the pharmacodynamics of theophylline, no change in theophylline dose should be needed as a consequence of nefazodone co-administration.

This study was conducted to determine the potential for an interaction between nefazodone, a new antidepressant, and triazolam after a single dose of triazolam and multiple doses of nefazodone in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy male volunteers. The metabolism of triazolam is dependent on cytochrome P450 3A4, and because nefazodone has been shown in vitro to be an inhibitor of this isoenzyme, this study was conducted to assess the potential for an interaction between the two drugs. Twelve subjects were assigned to one of two groups and received an oral dose of either placebo or 0.25 mg of triazolam on days 1 and 2. Nefazodone (200 mg) was administered twice daily from the evening of day 2 to the morning of day 9. Subjects received either 0.25 mg of triazolam or placebo with the nefazodone dose on the mornings of days 8 and 9. Serial blood samples were collected on the mornings of days 1, 2, 8, and 9 for the analysis of triazolam by a validated gas chromatography/electron capture detection method and on days 8 and 9 for the analysis of nefazodone and its metabolites, hydroxynefazodone (HO-nefazodone) and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet method. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis showed that there was no effect of triazolam on the pharmacokinetics of nefazodone, HO-nefazodone, or mCPP after the coadministration of triazolam and nefazodone. There was a significant effect of 200 mg of nefazodone twice daily on the pharmacokinetics of triazolam. Mean triazolam peak concentration values increased (p = 0.003) from 2.33 to 3.88 ng/ml when triazolam was administered alone and in combination with nefazodone, respectively. Corresponding mean triazolam area under the curve values increased (p < 0.001) from 8.14 to 31.74 ng.h/ml. The plasma protein binding of triazolam was approximately 85% when triazolam was given alone and when given concurrently with nefazodone. The increase in triazolam concentrations in plasma appears to be attributable to the inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolism by nefazodone. If triazolam is coadministered with nefazodone, a reduction in the triazolam dosage is recommended; no dosage adjustment is required for nefazodone.

Avagacestat is an orally active γ-secretase inhibitor that selectively inhibits amyloid β (Aβ) synthesis in cell culture and animal models. The objective of the current study was to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of multiple doses of avagacestat over 28 days in healthy young men and elderly men and women in a placebo-controlled, sequential-panel, ascending multiple-dose study.Thirty-three young men were assigned to four serial dose groups of avagacestat 15, 50, 100 or 150 mg (n = 6-7 per dose), or placebo (n = 2 per dose panel; 8 subjects total) once daily for 28 days. Elderly men and women were assigned to serial dose groups of avagacestat 50 mg and then 100 mg (n = 7 men, 6 women) or placebo (n = 2 men, 2 women) once daily for 14 days per dose level.Avagacestat was rapidly absorbed, had a terminal elimination half-life of 38-65 h, and reached a steady-state concentration by day 10 of daily dosing. Exposure in young subjects increased in proportion to dose. There were no apparent differences in steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve between young and elderly subjects; however, elderly subjects demonstrated a higher maximum plasma concentration for avagacestat. Doses of avagacestat50 mg/day reduced steady-state trough concentrations of CSF Aβ(1-38), Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) in a dose-dependent fashion over 28 days of daily dosing. There were no signs of potential Notch-related dose-limiting toxicities.The results support continued evaluation of avagacestat in an elderly target population with predementia and mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Reducing the maximum plasma concentration whilst maintaining the exposure was shown to ameliorate adverse events following the oral administration of 6-hydroxybuspirone. This observation, along with a desire to provide for once daily dosing of this compound, provided the basis for the development of an extended release formulation. Hydrophilic matrix tablets based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and containing citric acid to provide for an acid microenvironment were prepared and evaluated by in vitro drug release studies and in vivo pharmacokinetic and scintigraphic studies using samarium oxide (¹⁵³Sm) labelled dosage forms. The dosage forms were found to release the contained drug by a predominantly diffusion mechanism and the release rate was relatively independent of environmental pH. Following administration of the extended release formulations to volunteers, comparative pharmacokinetic data indicated that the extended release formulations provided for a reduction in the maximum plasma concentration of 64-70% relative to that provided by the same dose given as an oral solution, whilst maintaining exposure relative to the oral solution. By examination of absorption curves derived by Wagner-Nelson analysis of pharmacokinetic data it was noted that drug release in vivo correlated well with drug release observed in vitro and no marked change in rate of absorption was noted when dosage forms were located in and releasing drug in the colon. The robust control of drug release seen in vitro translated to a good in vivo performance.

The absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) and the pharmacokinetic characteristics of BMS-562086 [pexacerfont; 8-(6-methoxy-2-methyl-3-pyridinyl)-2,7-dimethyl-N-[(1R)-1-methylpropyl]pyrazolo(1,5-a)-1,3,5-triazin-4-amine (DPC-A69448)] were investigated in vitro and in animals to support its clinical development. BMS-562086 was orally bioavailable in rats, dogs, and chimpanzees, with an absolute oral bioavailability of 40.1, 58.8, and 58.5%, respectively. BMS-562086 was extensively metabolized in hepatocytes from all species and completely metabolized in rats. The primary biotransformation pathways found for BMS-562086 in both liver microsomal and hepatocyte preparations and in rats were similar. These included O-demethylation, hydroxylation at the N-alkyl side chain and N-dealkylation. Multiple cytochromes P450 including CYP3A4/5 were involved in the metabolic clearance of BMS-562086. Both renal and biliary excretion played a significant role in elimination of the metabolites of BMS-562086. The involvement of other metabolic enzymes in addition to CYP3A4/5 in elimination of BMS-562086 suggests a reduced potential for drug-drug interaction through modulation of CYP3A4/5. Chimpanzees proved to be a good animal model in predicting BMS-562086 human clearance. Virtual clinical trials performed with a population-based ADME simulator suggested that a minimal dose of 100 mg daily would provide sufficient drug exposure to achieve plasma concentrations above the projected human efficacious plasma concentration of BMS-562086 (> 500 nM). In summary, BMS-562086 exhibited favorable ADME and pharmacokinetic properties for further development.

Background γ-Secretase inhibitors (GSIs) are being investigated for their potential to modify the progression of Alzheimer disease based on their ability to regulate amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation. BMS-708163 (avagacestat) is an oral GSI designed for selective inhibition of Aβ synthesis currently in development for the treatment of mild to moderate and predementia AD. In addition to the desired effect on Aβ synthesis, GSIs affect Notch processing, which is thought to mediate some toxic adverse effects reported with this drug class. Avagacestat produced up to 190-fold greater selectivity for Aβ synthesis than Notch processing in preclinical studies and may therefore produce less toxic adverse events than other less selective compounds. Presented here are the results of the first in-human study for this new GSI compound. Objective The goal of this study was to assess the tolerability profile, pharmacokinetic properties, and effects on pharmacodynamic markers (Aβ, trefoil factor family 3 protein, dual specificity phosphatase 6, and hairy and enhancer of split-1) of single, oral doses of avagacestat in healthy, young, male volunteers. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study in 8 healthy young men (age, 18–45 years) per dosing panel. Each study participant was randomized to receive a single dose of placebo (n = 2) or avagacestat (n = 6 for each dose) as an oral solution in 1 of 9 sequential dose panels (0.3, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg). For determination of avagacestat, blood samples were obtained before dosing and for up to 144 hours after dosing. For participants in the 800-mg avagacestat dose panel, additional samples were obtained at 216, 312, and 648 hours. For 40–amino acid isoform of Aβ (Aβ 1–40 ) assessment, plasma samples were collected before avagacestat administration and up to 72 hours after dosing. Results Avagacestat concentrations peaked quickly after oral administration and then had a biphasic decrease in concentrations with a prolonged terminal phase. Exposures were proportional with doses up to 200 mg. Avagacestat was well tolerated at single oral doses up to 800 mg, with a biphasic effect on plasma Aβ 1–40 . Adverse events were predominately mild to moderate in severity with no evidence of dose dependence up to 200 mg. Conclusions Results from this single-ascending dose study suggest that avagacestat was tolerated at a single-dose range of 0.3 to 800 mg and suitable for further clinical development. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01454115.

Background: Antagonism of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors has been hypothesized as a potential target for the development of novel anxiolytics. This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of pexacerfont, a selective CRF-1 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Method: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator trial. Two hundred and sixty patients were randomly assigned to pexacerfont 100 mg/day (after a 1 week loading dose of 300 mg/day), placebo or escitalopram 20 mg/day in a 2:2:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to end point (week 8) in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score. Results: Pexacerfont 100 mg/day did not separate from placebo on the primary outcome measure. The half-powered active comparator arm, escitalopram 20 mg/day, demonstrated efficacy with significant separation from placebo at weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 (P

Importance Early identification of Alzheimer disease (AD) is important for clinical management and affords the opportunity to assess potential disease-modifying agents in clinical trials. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a randomized trial to prospectively enrich a study population with prodromal AD (PDAD) defined by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker criteria and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) symptoms. Objectives To assess the safety of the γ-secretase inhibitor avagacestat in PDAD and to determine whether CSF biomarkers can identify this patient population prior to clinical diagnosis of dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial with a parallel, untreated, nonrandomized observational cohort of CSF biomarker-negative participants was conducted May 26, 2009, to July 9, 2013, in a multicenter global population. Of 1358 outpatients screened, 263 met MCI and CSF biomarker criteria for randomization into the treatment phase. One hundred two observational cohort participants who met MCI criteria but were CSF biomarker-negative were observed during the same study period to evaluate biomarker assay sensitivity. Interventions Oral avagacestat or placebo daily. Main Outcomes and Measure Safety and tolerability of avagacestat. Results Of the 263 participants in the treatment phase, 132 were randomized to avagacestat and 131 to placebo; an additional 102 participants were observed in an untreated observational cohort. Avagacestat was relatively well tolerated with low discontinuation rates (19.6%) at a dose of 50 mg/d, whereas the dose of 125 mg/d had higher discontinuation rates (43%), primarily attributable to gastrointestinal tract adverse events. Increases in nonmelanoma skin cancer and nonprogressive, reversible renal tubule effects were observed with avagacestat. Serious adverse event rates were higher with avagacestat (49 participants [37.1%]) vs placebo (31 [23.7%]), attributable to the higher incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. At 2 years, progression to dementia was more frequent in the PDAD cohort (30.7%) vs the observational cohort (6.5%). Brain atrophy rate in PDAD participants was approximately double that of the observational cohort. Concordance between abnormal amyloid burden on positron emission tomography and pathologic CSF was approximately 87% (κ = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87). No significant treatment differences were observed in the avagacestat vs placebo arm in key clinical outcome measures. Conclusions and Relevance Avagacestat did not demonstrate efficacy and was associated with adverse dose-limiting effects. This PDAD population receiving avagacestat or placebo had higher rates of clinical progression to dementia and greater brain atrophy compared with CSF biomarker–negative participants. The CSF biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography imaging were correlated, suggesting that either modality could be used to confirm the presence of cerebral amyloidopathy and identify PDAD. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00890890

Lanoteplase is a rationally designed variant of tissue plasminogen activator. The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics and functional activity of a single intravenous bolus dose of lanoteplase with those of a bolus plus two-step infusion of alteplase. Seven-centre substudy of the InTIME-I angiographic trial in patients presenting within 6 hours of onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction. A total of 31 patients (28 males, 3 females) enrolled in this substudy [mean age 59 (range 26 to 76) years]. Twenty-three patients randomised to lanoteplase received single bolus doses of 15 kU/kg (n = 5), 30 kU/kg (n = 3), 60 kU/kg (n = 9), or 120 kU/kg (n = 6). Eight patients received alteplase ≤-100mg as a bolus followed by a two-stage 90 min infusion. Blood samples were analysed for antigen concentration and plasminogen activator (PA) activity. The distribution plasma half-life of approximately 35 min for lanoteplase was at least five times longer than that of alteplase. Lanoteplase plasma clearance averaged 3 L/h (50 ml/min), whereas the mean plasma clearance of approximately 24 L/h (400 ml/min) for alteplase approaches hepatic blood flow following acute myocardial infarction. PA activity after lanoteplase 120 kU/kg remained for 6 hours, compared with less than 4 hours after alteplase 100mg. The longer antigen and activity half-lives, slower clearance and less complicated administration of lanoteplase compared with alteplase suggest that it may offer advantages for use as a single intravenous bolus to achieve reperfusion after myocardial infarction.

This study was conducted to determine the potential for an interaction between nefazodone (NEF), a new antidepressant, and lorazepam (LOR) after single- and multiple-dose administration in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in healthy male volunteers. A total of 12 subjects per group received either placebo (PLA) twice daily, 2 mg of LOR twice daily, 200 mg of NEF twice daily, or the combination of 2 mg of LOR and 200 mg of NEF (LOR+NEF) twice daily for 7 days. Plasma samples were collected after dosing on day 1 and day 7 and before the morning dose on days 4, 5, and 6 for the determination of LOR, NEF, and NEF metabolites hydroxy (HO)-NEF, m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), and dione by validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Steady-state levels in plasma were reached by day 4 for LOR, NEF, HO-NEF, mCPP, and dione. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis showed that there was no effect of LOR on the single dose or steady-state pharmacokinetics of NEF, HO-NEF, or dione after coadministration. The steady-state mCPP Cmax values decreased 36% for the LOR+NEF group in comparison to that when NEF was given alone. There was no effect of NEF on the pharmacokinetics of LOR after coadministration. The absence of an interaction appears to be attributable to LOR's metabolic clearance being dependant on conjugation rather than hydroxylation. Overall, no change in LOR or NEF dosage is necessary when the two drugs are coadministered.

This study was conducted to determine the potential for an interaction between nefazodone, a new antidepressant, and alprazolam after single- and multiple-dose administration in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in 48 healthy male volunteers. A group of 12 subjects received either placebo twice daily, 1 mg of alprazolam twice daily, 200 mg of nefazodone twice daily, or the combination of 1 mg of alprazolam and 200 mg of nefazodone twice daily for 7 days. Serial blood samples were collected after dosing on day 1 and day 7 and before the morning dose on days 4, 5, and 6 for the determination of alprazolam and its metabolites alpha-hydroxyalprazolam (AOH) and 4-hydroxyalprazolam (4OH) and nefazodone and its metabolites hydroxynefazodone (HO-nefazodone), m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), and a triazole dione metabolite (dione) by validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods. Steady-state levels in plasma were reached by day 4 for alprazolam, 4OH, nefazodone, HO-nefazodone, mCPP, and dione. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis showed that at steady state, alprazolam Cmax and AUCtau values significantly increased approximately twofold and 4OH Cmax and AUCtau values significantly decreased by 40 and 26%, respectively, when nefazodone was coadministered with alprazolam. There was no effect of alprazolam on the single-dose or steady-state pharmacokinetics of nefazodone, HO-nefazodone, or dione after the coadministration of alprazolam and nefazodone. However, the mean steady-state mCPP Cmax and AUCtau significantly increased by approximately threefold and t1/2 values significantly increased by approximately twofold after the coadministration of alprazolam and nefazodone in comparison to those when nefazodone was given alone. Competitive inhibition between alprazolam and nefazodone metabolism at cytochrome P450 3A4 may be responsible for the pharmacokinetic interaction when alprazolam and nefazodone were coadministered. No adjustment of nefazodone dosage is required when nefazodone and alprazolam are coadministered. Because alprazolam concentrations in plasma are increased in the presence of nefazodone, a reduction in alprazolam dosage is recommended when the two agents are coadministered.

Nefazodone, an antidepressant with serotonin and norepinephrine receptor modulating activity, is highly protein bound and eliminated by oxidative metabolism. This study evaluated the potential for clinically significant drug interactions with warfarin and nefazodone coadministration. Eighteen subjects received warfarin daily for 14 days, achieving steady-state warfarin concentrations and a stable prothrombin ratio. Nefazodone 200 mg every 12 hours (n = 12) or placebo every 12 hours (n = 6) was then added to the daily warfarin dose for the next 7 days in a double-blind, randomized design. No serious or unexpected adverse events or events suggestive of abnormal bleeding occurred during coadministration. The addition of nefazodone had no effect on the unbound fraction of total warfarin in plasma or on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of R-warfarin based on within-subject or comparison to placebo-treated subjects. The steady-state AUCTAU over the dosing interval and Cmax of S-warfarin decreased by 12%; however, this change is clinically insignificant because the prothrombin ratio and bleeding time remained unchanged. The steady-state minimum concentrations for nefazodone and metabolites, achieved on coadministration day 3, were typical of healthy men treated with this nefazodone dosage. In conclusion, warfarin and nefazodone coadministration was safe and well-tolerated with no clinically significant interactions.

A method for the high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) determination of serum concentrations of d,l-4-amino-N-(alpha-methylbenzyl)-benzamide and its N-acetylated metabolite is described. The compounds are isolated from a 50-microL sample of serum using solid phase extraction. The compounds and internal standard are eluted from the extraction column with acetonitrile. Quantitation is performed via UV detection at 275 nm following isocratic reversed-phase (C18) separation using a ternary solvent system. The assay procedure is useful for the determination of concentrations of parent compound from 0.63 to 87.9 micrograms/mL from 50 microL of serum.