Search

A seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction has been organized by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. The results are presented in two parts, with this second part focusing on methods for ranking crystal structures in order of stability. The exercise involved standardized sets of structures seeded from a range of structure generation methods. Participants from 22 groups applied several periodic DFT-D methods, machine learned potentials, force fields derived from empirical data or quantum chemical calculations, and various combinations of the above. In addition, one non-energy-based scoring function was used. Results showed that periodic DFT-D methods overall agreed with experimental data within expected error margins, while one machine learned model, applying system-specific AIMnet potentials, agreed with experiment in many cases demonstrating promise as an efficient alternative to DFT-based methods. For target XXXII, a consensus was reached across periodic DFT methods, with consistently high predicted energies of experimental forms relative to the global minimum (above 4 kJ mol -1 at both low and ambient temperatures) suggesting a more stable polymorph is likely not yet observed. The calculation of free energies at ambient temperatures offered improvement of predictions only in some cases (for targets XXVII and XXXI). Several avenues for future research have been suggested, highlighting the need for greater efficiency considering the vast amounts of resources utilized in many cases., (open access.)

A seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction was organized by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre featuring seven target systems of varying complexity: a silicon and iodine-containing molecule, a copper coordination complex, a near-rigid molecule, a cocrystal, a polymorphic small agrochemical, a highly flexible polymorphic drug candidate, and a polymorphic morpholine salt. In this first of two parts focusing on structure generation methods, many crystal structure prediction (CSP) methods performed well for the small but flexible agrochemical compound, successfully reproducing the experimentally observed crystal structures, while few groups were successful for the systems of higher complexity. A powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) assisted exercise demonstrated the use of CSP in successfully determining a crystal structure from a low-quality PXRD pattern. The use of CSP in the prediction of likely cocrystal stoichiometry was also explored, demonstrating multiple possible approaches. Crystallographic disorder emerged as an important theme throughout the test as both a challenge for analysis and a major achievement where two groups blindly predicted the existence of disorder for the first time. Additionally, large-scale comparisons of the sets of predicted crystal structures also showed that some methods yield sets that largely contain the same crystal structures., (open access.)

A topochemical polymerization governed by a topotactic polymorphic transition is reported. A monomer functionalized with azide and an internal alkyne crystallized as an unreactive polymorph with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. The molecules are aligned in a head-to-head fashion, thereby avoiding the azide-alkyne proximity for the topochemical azide-alkyne cycloaddition (TAAC) reaction. However, upon heating, one of the two conformers underwent a drastic 180° rotation, leading to a single-crystal-to-single-crystal (SCSC) polymorphic transition to a reactive form, wherein the molecules are head-to-tail arranged, ensuring azide-alkyne proximity. The new polymorph underwent TAAC reaction to form a trisubstituted 1,2,3-triazole-linked polymer. These results, showing unexpected topochemical reactivity of a crystal due to the intermediacy of an SCSC polymorphic transition from an unreactive form to a reactive form, highlight that predicting topochemical reactivity by relying on the static crystal structure can be misleading.