Search

Introduction Care of pediatric cancer patients is increasingly being provided by physicians in community settings, including general emergency departments. Guidelines based on current evidence have standardized the care of children undergoing chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) presenting with fever and neutropenia (FN). Objective This narrative review evaluates the management of pediatric patients with cancer and neutropenic fever and provides comparison with the care of the adult with neutropenic fever in the emergency department. Discussion When children with cancer and FN first present for care, stratification of risk is based on a thorough history and physical examination, baseline laboratory and radiologic studies and the clinical condition of the patient, much like that for the adult patient. Prompt evaluation and initiation of intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics after cultures are drawn but before other studies are resulted is critically important and may represent a practice difference for some emergency physicians when compared with standardized adult care. Unlike adults, all high-risk and most low-risk children with FN undergoing chemotherapy require admission for parenteral antibiotics and monitoring. Oral antibiotic therapy with close, structured outpatient monitoring may be considered only for certain low-risk patients at pediatric centers equipped to pursue this treatment strategy. Conclusions Although there are many similarities between the emergency approach to FN in children and adults with cancer, there are differences that every emergency physician should know. This review provides strategies to optimize the care of FN in children with cancer in all emergency practice settings.

Study objective There has been increasing attention to screening for health-related social needs. However, little is known about the screening practices of emergency departments (EDs). Within New England, we seek to identify the prevalence of ED screening for health-related social needs, understand the factors associated with screening, and understand how screening patterns for health-related social needs differ from those for violence, substance use, and mental health needs. Methods We analyzed data from the 2018 National Emergency Department Inventory–New England survey, which was administered to all 194 New England EDs during 2019. We used descriptive statistics to compare ED characteristics by screening practices, and multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with screening. Results Among the 166 (86%) responding EDs, 64 (39%) reported screening for at least one health-related social need, 160 (96%) for violence (including intimate partner violence or other violent exposures), 148 (89%) for substance use disorder, and 159 (96%) for mental health needs. EDs reported a wide range of social work resources to address identified needs, with 155 (93%) reporting any social worker availability and 41 (27%) reporting continuous availability. Conclusion New England EDs are screening for health-related social needs at a markedly lower rate than for violence, substance use, and mental health needs. EDs have relatively limited resources available to address health-related social needs. We encourage research on the development of scalable solutions for identifying and addressing health-related social needs in the ED.

Objective No oropharyngeal devices exist for use in conscious and semiconscious trauma patients during emergency evacuation, transport, or resuscitation. We aimed to test the hypotheses that the ManMaxAirway (MMA) is better tolerated than the standard Guedel‐style device in awake volunteers and that it produces a jaw thrust and improves air flow. Methods This was a randomized cross‐over study of healthy volunteers with either the MMA or standard device. The primary outcome of tolerability was defined as maintaining the device in place for 60 seconds. Secondary outcomes included respiratory system function and jaw thrust. Resistance to airflow through the device lumen was measured in situ and when placed in subjects in the pulmonary laboratory alone. Jaw thrust was quantified as displacement between the mandibular condyle and condylar fossa apex relative to baseline visualized with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results We enrolled 19 subjects. Of these, a convenience sample of 5 individuals was selected for MRI; the remaining individuals (n = 14) were randomized for the cross‐over study. All 14 subjects were able to maintain the MMA for 60 seconds compared with 2/14 (14%) with the standard device (odds ratio, 145; 95% confidence interval, 6.3‐3314). Subjects reported that the experimental device was more comfortable and its placement did not trigger the gag reflex. Airway resistance produced by the MMA in an oscillatory flow model was nearly an order of magnitude lower than that of the standard device (experimental vs standard, 8 Hz—0.092 vs 0.786 cmH20·s/L; 15 Hz—0.193 vs 1.321 cmH20·s/L). Rapid induction of the gag reflex precluded further measurements with the standard device. Forced oscillation pulmonary testing in conscious volunteers with and without the MMA demonstrated that the device decreased respiratory system resistance to airflow and reduced respiratory elastance (31% ± 8% and 44% ± 13.4%, respectively; P

The U.S. opioid epidemic persists, yet it is unclear if opioid-related emergency department (ED) policies have changed. We investigated: 1) the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) prevention and treatment policies in New England EDs in 2018, and 2) how these policies have changed since 2014.Using the National Emergency Department Inventory-USA, we identified and surveyed all New England EDs in 2015 and 2019 about opioid-related policies in 2014 and 2018, respectively. The surveys assessed OUD prevention policies (to use a screening tool, access the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program [PDMP], notify primary care providers, prescribe/dispense naloxone) and treatment policies (to refer to recovery resources, prescribe/dispense buprenorphine).Of 194 EDs open in 2018, 167 (86 %) completed the survey. Of 193 EDs open in 2018 and 2014, 147 (76 %) completed both surveys. In 2018, the most commonly-reported policy was accessing the PDMP (96 %); the least commonly-reported policy was prescribing/dispensing buprenorphine to at risk patients (37 %). EDs varied in prescribing/dispensing naloxone: 35 % of EDs offered naloxone to ≥80 % of patients at risk of opioid overdose versus 33 % of EDs to10 % of patients at risk. Most EDs (74 %) reported prescribing/dispensing buprenorphine to10 % of patients with OUD. Comparing 2018 to 2014, the greatest difference in policy use was in prescribing/dispensing naloxone (+55 %, p0.001).Implementation of opioid-related ED policies increased between 2014 and 2018. Continued effort is needed to understand the extent to which policy implementation translates to clinical care, and to best translate evidence-based policies into clinical practice.

Serotonin syndrome is a toxicological entity with potential morbidity and mortality if unrecognized and untreated. Toxicity can occur after dose or increase or initiation of additional serotonergic...

BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide (CO) exposure causes roughly 40,000 emergency department (ED) visits annually and is commonly misdiagnosed. Whereas the standard method of carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) measurement utilizes blood gas analysis, a noninvasive, FDA-cleared alternative exists. We evaluated the performance of pulse oximetry (SpCO) for identification of CO exposure in ED patients. METHODS: We compared pulse oximetry to blood HbCO levels in a prospective observational study of adult and pediatric subjects recruited from the ED. Nurses screened a convenience sample of patients and referred those with SpCO ≥ 10% to research staff. Researchers also approached individuals who presented with signs and symptoms of CO toxicity. We determined diagnostic performance with a Bland-Altman analysis and calculated sensitivity and specificity for detection of elevated HbCO at thresholds of ≥ 10% and ≥ 15%. To optimize the potential sensitivity of SpCO for detection of CO toxicity, research technicians performed 3 SpCO readings within 5 min of the blood draw for laboratory measurement. A positive SpCO test was defined as any SpCO ≥ 10%. RESULTS: 42,000 patients were screened, 212 were evaluated, and 126 subjects were enrolled. Median HbCO level was 6% (range 1.6–21.9%). Limits of agreement were −10.3% and 8.1%. Of 23 individuals with elevated HbCO ≥ 10%, 13 were not suspected based on clinical assessment. Critically elevated HbCO was present in 6 individuals. Based on our a priori threshold of 10% for a positive test, pulse oximetry identified 14 of 23 subjects with HbCO ≥ 10%, with a sensitivity of 61% (95% CI 39–80%) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI 78–92%), and 5 of 6 subjects with HbCO ≥ 15%, with a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 36–100%) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI 73–87%). CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximetry underestimated HbCO and produced false negative results (ie, SpCO