Search

The Revised Hammersmith Scale (RHS) for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) was designed as a psychometrically robust clinical outcome assessment to assess physical abilities of patients with type 2 and 3 SMA. The reliability properties of the RHS have not yet been reported. A prospective RHS reliability study was undertaken in a UK cohort of experienced neuromuscular paediatric Physiotherapists. Reliability testing was conducted via a virtual survey platform two weeks apart. Through the virtual platform participants scored videos of two RHS assessments, one of a child with SMA 2 and one of a child with SMA 3. Inter and intra-rater reliability was analysed using a type 3 Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Intra-rater agreement was further analysed using Bland Altman (BA) Limits of Agreement (LOA) and plots. The acceptable inter and intra-rater variability was set as a change of ± 2 by the international team of expert physiotherapists who developed the RHS. Inter-rater agreement, n = 22 raters, type 3 ICC was 0.989 (95% CI 0.944 to 1.00), 97.7% of scores were within the acceptable limits of ± 2 points. Intra-rater agreement, n = 21 raters, type 3 ICC ranged from 0.922 to 1.0, with 97.6% of scores within the acceptable limits of ± 2 points. The mean SMA 2 intra-rater difference was -0.10 (-0.6 to 0.4), with lower LOA -2.24 and upper LOA +2.04. Intra-rater difference between tests for SMA 3 intra-rater difference was -0.05 (-0.6 to 0.5), with lower LOA -2.48 and upper LOA +2.38. Intra-rater scoring precision fell within BA agreement limits of ±2 points. The results demonstrate that the RHS is highly reliable when used by experienced UK physiotherapists, and variability of test scores regarding inter and intra-rater reliability was confirmed to lie within ±2 points. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess 12 month changes in upper limb function in patients affected by spinal muscular atrophy type 2 and 3.Methods: Longitudinal 12 month data was collected in 114 patients, 60 type 2 and 54 type 3, using the Revised Upper Limb Module.Results: The 12 month changes ranged between -7 and 9 (mean: -0.41; SD: 2.93). The mean changes were not significantly different between the three spinal muscular atrophy groups (-0.45 in type 2, -0.23 in non-ambulant type 3 and -0.34 in ambulant type 3, p = 0.96) and the relationship between 12 month change and age classes was not significantly different among the three types of SMA patients.Discussion: Our results confirm that the Module explores a wide range of functional abilities and can be used in ambulant and non-ambulant patients of different ages in conjunction with other functional scales. Muscle Nerve 59:426-430, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Reports on the clinical meaningfulness of outcome measures in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are rare. In this two-part study, our aim was to explore patients’ and caregivers’ views on the clinical relevance of the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded- (HFMSE). Methods: First, we used focus groups including SMA patients and caregivers to explore their views on the clinical relevance of the individual activities included in the HFMSE. Then we asked caregivers to comment on the clinical relevance of possible changes of HFMSE scores over time. As functional data of individual patients were available, some of the questions were tailored according to their functional level on the HFMSE. Results: Part 1: Sixty-three individuals participated in the focus groups. This included 30 caregivers, 25 patients and 8 professionals who facilitated the discussion. The caregivers provided a comparison to activities of daily living for each of the HFMSE items. Part 2: One hundred and forty-nine caregivers agreed to complete the questionnaire: in response to a general question, 72% of the caregivers would consider taking part in a clinical trial if the treatment was expected to slow down deterioration, 88% if it would stop deterioration and 97% if the treatment was expected to produce an improvement. Caregivers were informed of the first three items that their child could not achieve on the HFMSE. In response 75% indicated a willingness to take part in a clinical trial if they could achieve at least one of these abilities, 89% if they could achieve two, and 100% if they could achieve more than 2. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of the HFMSE as a key outcome measure in SMA clinical trials because the individual items and the detected changes have clear content validity and clinical meaningfulness for patients and their caregivers. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-017-0790-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction/Aims Methods Results Discussion Available studies on scoliosis surgery in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have focused on the primary outcome of the procedure—the correction of the curve—whereas research focusing on secondary outcomes is scarce. We aimed to investigate postsurgical changes in respiratory function, motor function, weight, pain, and satisfaction.We retrospectively reviewed the clinical notes of 32 disease‐modifying treatment‐naïve patients (26 SMA2, 6 nonambulant SMA3). We also performed investigator‐developed phone interviews and conducted a focus group with families on postsurgical satisfaction.Mean annual rate of forced vital capacity percent decline improved in SMA2: −3.2% postsurgery versus −6.9% presurgery (p < .001), with similar trajectories in SMA3. Gross motor functional scores (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale) available in 12/32 dropped immediately after surgery: median loss of 6.5 points, with relatively spared upper limb function. Weight z‐scores postsurgery dropped in 16/32, requiring food supplements (5/16); one/16 lost >5% of total weight requiring gastrostomy. Postsurgical pain was frequently reported, especially hip pain (13/32). Overall, 10/10 patients/parents participating in the phone interview rated the procedure as very successful for posture and physical appearance. Nonetheless, 7/10 reported postsurgical pain, reduced mobility, and unmet care needs. The seven patients/parents attending the focus group highlighted lack of intensive physiotherapy programs, occupational therapy assistance, and psychological support as postsurgical unmet care needs.This study reports a positive impact of scoliosis surgery on respiratory function and overall satisfaction with posture and physical appearance. The observed negative impact on the other outcomes highlights the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to improve postoperative management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]