Search

Occupational hazards in the petroleum industry have always been among the major problems in the various phases of construction and installation, which sometimes cause environmental damage. The present study aims to evaluate the risk of occupational accidents in the petroleum industry in the construction phase (2010-2015) in one of the largest oil fields in Iran, namely the Yadavaran Oil Field in Khuzestan Province, and also discuss the lateral environmental damage. The environmental damage such as air, soil, and water pollution caused by occupational accidents were identified, and the distribution and type of activity were analyzed. For this purpose, the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) model was applied to evaluate the risk of occupational accidents. A total of 47 occupational accidents were identified during the 6-year construction phase of this oil field. The data was collected and underwent statistical analysis and risk assessment based on the location and hazards clustering, which is the main novelty of the article. According to the results, the average number of risk priorities for the observed occupational accidents was 212. Also, the occupational accidents were categorized by the type of accidents, and several corrective measures suitable for each type of accident were suggested. Based on these suggestions, the corrective Risk Priority Number (RPN) was expected to be about 133.2. As a result of these corrections, the risk reduction was expected to be 37% of the initial value. The changes introduced were low-cost, continuous, and periodic measures with positive effects on this oil field.

Due to increasing solid waste generation and their significant impacts on human health, environmental assessment of the management and disposal methods become more and more important. There are various disposal methods which are the combinations that originate from a wide range of solid waste management systems. In this study, municipal waste of Tehran (which totals to 7507.5 tons/day) is assessed according to five suggested scenarios. Life cycle assessment method was applied to compare the selected scenarios to select the most efficient solid waste management scenario in Tehran. Hence, the Eco-indicator 99 is utilized as the impact assessment method. The effects are evaluated in three categories including; effects on human health (organic substances, inorganic substances, climate change, ionizing radiation and ozone layer depletion), ecosystem quality (ecotoxic emissions, the combination of acidification & eutrophication and double coating) and resources (extraction of minerals and the fossil fuels). According to the results, scenario one leads to the most damage to the environment especially on the human health, whereas scenario four has the most positive impacts compared to the others. However, scenarios two and three are unsuitable due to their negative effects on human health. Although, scenario five shows positive results on the resources but again it has negative impacts on human health and ecosystem quality. Moreover, the most appropriate strategy in terms of land usage and energy consumption, again is scenario four (landfilling plus recycling and composting) is chosen as the most proper strategy.