Search

Introduction and objectives: Patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis have been excluded from the trials that support the non-inferiority of the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) compared to the fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the decision-making process of coronary revascularization. This study proposes to prospectively assess the concordance between the two indices in LMCA lesions and to validate the iFR cut-off value of 0.89 for clinical use. Methods: National, prospective, and observational multicenter registry of 300 consecutive patients with intermediate lesions in the LMCA (angiographic stenosis, 25% to 60%. A pressure gudiewire study and determination of the RFF and the iFR will be performed: in the event of a negative concordant result (FFR > 0.80/iFR > 0.89), no treatment will be performed; in case of a positive concordant result (FFR ≤ 0.80/iFR ≤ 0.89), revascularization will be performed; In the event of a discordant result (FFR> 0.80/iFR ≤ 0.89 or FFR ≤ 0.80/iFR> 0.89), an intravascular echocardiography will be performed and revascularization will be delayed if the minimum lumen area is > 6 mm2. The primary clinical endpoint will be a composite of cardiovascular death, LMCA lesion-related non-fatal infarction or need for revascularization of the LMCA lesion at 12 months. Conclusions: Confirm that an iFR-guided decision-making process in patients with intermediate LMCA stenosis is clinically safe and would have a significant clinical impact. Also, justify its systematic use when prescribing treatment in these potentially high-risk patients. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( Identifier: NCT03767621).

Introduction and objectives: The COVID-19 epidemic and the declaration of the state of alarm have led to a decrease in healthcare activity in interventional cardiology units. The objective of this study is to quantify these changes in activity, with special interest in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: A telematic survey of 81 centers involved in STEMI networks in the 17 autonomous communities of Spain. Information was collected on diagnostic activity, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), structural interventions, and PCI in STEMI on changes in the organization of STEMI networks, and on the prevalence of COVID-19 among interventional cardiologists. Data was compared for the week of February 24 through March 1 (before the outbreak) and for the week of March 16 through March 22 (during the outbreak). Results: Response has been obtained from 73 centers (90%). A very significant decrease in the number of diagnostic procedures (─56%), PCI (─48%), structural interventions (─81%) and PCI in STEMI (─40%) has been observed. A slight increase in the use of pharmacological thrombolysis has been reported, although primary angioplasty remains the leading reperfusion strategy. Up to 5% of interventional cardiologists (17) had COVID-19. Conclusions: An important reduction in the activity in interventional cardiology has been observed during the COVID-19 epidemic. Likewise, a great decrease has been detected in the number of patients treated in the STEMI networks, with the risk of increased morbidity and mortality that this represents. Scientific societies and health authorities have to promote that patients presenting STEMI compatible symptoms proceed with no delay to access the health system to receive reperfusion treatment in an appropriate way.

AIMS The aim of this study was to assess clinical and prognosis differences in patients with COVID-19 and STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS Using a nationwide registry of consecutive patients managed within 42 specific STEMI care networks, we compared patient and procedure characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in two different cohorts, according to whether or not they had COVID-19. Among 1,010 consecutive STEMI patients, 91 were identified as having COVID-19 (9.0%). With the exception of smoking status (more frequent in non-COVID-19 patients) and previous coronary artery disease (more frequent in COVID-19 patients), clinical characteristics were similar between the groups, but COVID-19 patients had more heart failure on arrival (31.9% vs 18.4%, p=0.002). Mechanical thrombectomy (44% vs 33.5%, p=0.046) and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration (20.9% vs 11.2%, p=0.007) were more frequent in COVID-19 patients, who had an increased in-hospital mortality (23.1% vs 5.7%, p

espanolIntroduccion y objetivos: La epidemia de COVID-19 y la declaracion del estado de alarma han propiciado una disminucion en la actividad en la cardiologia intervencionista. El objetivo de este estudio es cuantificar esta disminucion, con especial interes en el funcionamiento del codigo infarto. Metodos: Se realizo una encuesta telematica a 81 centros de las 17 comunidades autonomas espanolas con procedimientos de codigo infarto. Se recogio informacion sobre la actividad diagnostica, el intervencionismo coronario, el intervencionismo estructural y el intervencionismo en el seno del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevacion del segmento ST (IAMCEST) sobre cambios en la organizacion de las redes del infarto y sobre la afeccion por COVID-19 de las plantillas de cardiologia intervencionista. Se compararon 2 periodos: uno entre el 24 de febrero y el 1 de marzo (antes del inicio de la pandemia en Espana) y el otro entre el 16 y el 22 de marzo (durante la pandemia). Resultados: Se obtuvo respuesta de 73 centros (90%) que evidencio una disminucion significativa en el numero de procedimientos diagnosticos (─56%), terapeuticos coronarios (─48%), terapeuticos estructurales (─81%) y en el seno del IAMCEST (─40%). Se indico un leve incremento en el uso de trombolisis. Se diagnostico infeccion por COVID-19 en 17 cardiologos intervencionistas (5%). Conclusiones: Se observo una reduccion importante de la actividad asistencial durante la epidemia de COVID-19 y una gran disminucion en el numero de pacientes tratados con IAMCEST, con el riesgo de incremento de morbimortalidad que esto supone. Las sociedades cientificas y autoridades sanitarias deberian promover que los pacientes con sintomas compatibles con IAMCEST demanden asistencia al sistema sanitario para poder recibir el tratamiento de reperfusion de forma adecuada. EnglishIntroduction and objectives: The COVID-19 epidemic and the declaration of the state of alarm have led to a decrease in healthcare activity in interventional cardiology units. The objective of this study is to quantify these changes in activity, with special interest in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: A telematic survey of 81 centers involved in STEMI networks in the 17 autonomous communities of Spain. Information was collected on diagnostic activity, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), structural interventions, and PCI in STEMI on changes in the organization of STEMI networks, and on the prevalence of COVID-19 among interventional cardiologists. Data was compared for the week of February 24 through March 1 (before the outbreak) and for the week of March 16 through March 22 (during the outbreak). Results: Response has been obtained from 73 centers (90%). A very significant decrease in the number of diagnostic procedures (─56%), PCI (─48%), structural interventions (─81%) and PCI in STEMI (─40%) has been observed. A slight increase in the use of pharmacological thrombolysis has been reported, although primary angioplasty remains the leading reperfusion strategy. Up to 5% of interventional cardiologists (17) had COVID-19. Conclusions: An important reduction in the activity in interventional cardiology has been observed during the COVID-19 epidemic. Likewise, a great decrease has been detected in the number of patients treated in the STEMI networks, with the risk of increased morbidity and mortality that this represents. Scientific societies and health authorities have to promote that patients presenting STEMI compatible symptoms proceed with no delay to access the health system to receive reperfusion treatment in an appropriate way.

RESUMEN Introducción y objetivos: Los pacientes con estenosis en el tronco coronario izquierdo (TCI) han sido excluidos de los ensayos que apoyan la no inferioridad del cociente de presiones en el índice diastólico instantáneo sin ondas (iFR) respecto a la reserva fraccional de flujo (RFF) en la toma de decisiones sobre revascularización coronaria. El presente estudio propone valorar de manera prospectiva la concordancia entre los dos índices en lesiones del TCI y validar el valor de corte del iFR de 0,89 para su uso clínico. Métodos: Registro multicéntrico nacional, prospectivo, observacional, con la inclusión de 300 pacientes consecutivos con lesiones intermedias (estenosis angiográfica 25-60%) en el TCI. Se realizará un estudio con guía de presión y determinación de RFF e iFR. En caso de resultado concordante negativo (RFF > 0,80 / iFR > 0,89), no se realizará tratamiento; en caso de resultado concordante positivo (RFF ≤ 0,80 / iFR ≤ 0,89), se realizará revascularización; en caso de resultado discordante (RFF > 0,80 / iFR ≤ 0,89 o RFF ≤ 0,80 / iFR > 0,89), se realizará estudio con ecocardiografía intravascular y se considerará diferir la revascularización si el área luminal mínima es > 6 mm2. El criterio de valoración clínico primario será la incidencia del combinado de muerte cardiovascular, infarto no mortal relacionado con la lesión del TCI o necesidad de revascularización de la lesión del TCI a los 12 meses. Conclusiones: La demostración de la seguridad clínica en la toma de decisiones del iFR en pacientes con lesiones intermedias en el TCI tendría un impacto clínico importante y justificaría su uso sistemático para la decisión del tratamiento en estos pacientes de potencial alto riesgo. Registrado en ClinicalTrials.gov (identificador: NCT03767621).

Resumen Introduccion y objetivos Los pacientes mayores de 75 anos con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevacion del segmento ST sometidos a angioplastia primaria en situacion de shock cardiogenico sufren una gran mortalidad. La identificacion previa al procedimento de variables predictoras de la posterior mortalidad seria muy util para guiar la toma de decisiones. Metodos Analisis del registro multicentrico de angioplastia primaria en pacientes mayores de 75 anos (ESTROFA MI + 75), que incluye a 3.576 pacientes. Se analizaron las caracteristicas y la evolucion clinica del subgrupo con shock cardiogenico para identificar predictores de supervivencia a 1 ano tras la angioplastia y elaborar un indice pronostico. Se valido el indice en una cohorte independiente. Resultados Se incluyo a 332 pacientes. Los predictores basales independientes fueron: la localizacion anterior (HR = 2,8; IC95%, 1,4-6,0; p = 0,005), una fraccion de eyeccion 6 h (HR = 3,2; IC95%, 1,6-7,5; p = 0,001). Se diseno un indice basado en estas variables (indice «6-ANT-40»). La supervivencia a 1 ano fue del 54,5% de aquellos con indice 0, el 32,3% con indice 1, el 27,4% con indice 2 y el 17% con indice 3 (p = 0,004, estadistico C = 0,70). En una cohorte independiente de 124 pacientes, las supervivencias a 1 ano fueron del 64,5, el 40,0, el 28,9 y el 22,2% respectivamente (p = 0,008; estadistico C = 0,68). Conclusiones Un indice basado en simples variables clinicas previas al procedimiento (localizacion anterior, fraccion de eyeccion 6 h) permite estimar la supervivencia tras una angioplastia primaria de los pacientes mayores con shock cardiogenico, y asi ayudar en la toma de decisiones.

QUESTION: Compared to the pressure guidewire what possible advantages does coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRangio) have and what is the current clinical evidence? ANSWER: Different physiological indices have been developed lately from the 3D reconstruction of the angiogram based on 2 projections and the application of fluid dynamics algorithms. These indices estimate fractional flow reserve (FFR) semi-invasively because, although they are based on percutaneous coronary angiography with contrast, pressure guidewires or drugs are not necessary in the coronary artery. The most widely studied software package to obtain these indices is the one designed by Medis (QAngio XA 3D, Medis Medical Imaging System, The Netherlands), but there are others in the pipeline.1 The actual software allows us to obtain the baseline quantitative flow ratio (QFR) (fixed QFR [fQFR]). There is another one that adds the speed of the flow of contrast to the estimate (contrast QFR [cQFR]) by quantifying the TIMI frame count. It can also obtain the adenosine-flow QFR (aQFR) with the administration of adenosine and the residual QFR after a hypothetic percutaneous treatment of the lesion. To this day, the current studies on FFRangio basically focus on analyzing its match (especially that of cQFR) with FFR or the instantaneous wave-free ratio...

To the Editor, We have read with great interest the results of the ISCHEMIA trial1 of 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia who were randomized to receive an early invasive strategy of angiography plus revascularization, when necessary, or a conservative strategy of early optimal medical therapy and angiography if the medical therapy failed. As already known, the conclusion is that an early invasive strategy does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular ischemic events or all-cause mortality at the follow-up. However, it had beneficial effects because it reduced the occurrence of spontaneous myocardial infarction at the expense of a number of peri-PCI myocardial infarctions. Currently, this observation is under discussion probably because a different result was expected by researchers. In an interesting article2 it has been argued that the ISCHEMIA trial did not compare the benefits of coronary revascularization vs medical therapy, but assessed an early strategy of medical therapy vs early invasive treatment with angiography. In this sense, 79.4% of the patients from the invasive group were percutaneous or surgically revascularized vs 21.0% of the patients from the conservative group. A careful review of the supplementary data of the original publication1 reveals interesting additional data that we wish to share. A...

Sr. Editor: Hemos leído con gran interés los resultados del estudio ISCHEMIA1, en el que se aleatorizó a 5.179 pacientes con isquemia moderada o grave para recibir una estrategia inicial invasiva, consistente en angiografía y revascularización si procedía, o conservadora, que incluía tratamiento médico óptimo inicial y angiografía si la terapia médica era «fallida». Se concluye, como ya se sabe, que la estrategia invasiva inicial no reduce el riesgo de eventos isquémicos cardiovasculares ni de muerte por cualquier causa durante el seguimiento, aunque tuvo un efecto beneficioso en la reducción del infarto de miocardio espontáneo, a costa de un número de infartos periangioplastia. Esta observación está siendo objeto de un importante debate debido probablemente a una expectativa que apuntaba en una dirección distinta. En un interesante artículo2 se ha argumentado que el estudio ISCHEMIA no comparó el beneficio de la revascularización coronaria frente al tratamiento médico, sino que evaluó una estrategia «inicial» de tratamiento médico frente a un tratamiento invasivo «inicial» con angiografía. En esta línea, un 79,4% de los pacientes del grupo invasivo fueron tratados con revascularización de forma percutánea o quirúrgica frente a un 21,0% en el grupo conservador. Una revisión cuidadosa del material suplementario de la publicación original1 revela...

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) networks should guarantee STEMI care with good clinical results and within the recommended time parameters. There is no contemporary information on the performance of these networks in Spain. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients, times to reperfusion, characteristics of the intervention performed, and 30-day mortality.Prospective, observational, multicenter registry of consecutive patients treated in 17 STEMI networks in Spain (83 centers with the Infarction Code), between April 1 and June 30, 2019.A total of 5401 patients were attended (mean age, 64±13 years; 76.9% male), of which 4366 (80.8%) had confirmed STEMI. Of these, 87.5% were treated with primary angioplasty, 4.4% with fibrinolysis, and 8.1% did not receive reperfusion. In patients treated with primary angioplasty, the time between symptom onset and reperfusion was 193 [135-315] minutes and the time between first medical contact and reperfusion was 107 [80-146] minutes. Overall 30-day mortality due to STEMI was 7.9%, while mortality in patients treated with primary angioplasty was 6.8%.Most patients with STEMI were treated with primary angioplasty. In more than half of the patients, the time from first medical contact to reperfusion was120 minutes. Mortality at 30 days was relatively low.

Background CHA2DS2-VASc Score is widely used to predict thromboembolic risk in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF). We sought to study if this score predicts outcomes in elderly patients with Non-ST segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (NSTEACS). Methods The multicenter LONGEVO-SCA prospective registry included 532 unselected patients with NSTEACS aged ≥80 years. Data to calculate CHA2DS2-VASc Score were available in 523 patients (98.3%). They were classified according to CHA2DS2-VASc Score: group 1 (score ≤ 4), and 2 (5-9). We studied outcomes in terms of mortality or readmission at 6 months follow-up. Results A total of 266 patients (51%) had a high CHA2DS2-VASc Score (group 2). They were more often women, with more cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension or diabetes mellitus, and history of previous stroke and cardiovascular disease and heart failure (all, P = .001). Geriatric syndromes (Barthel Index, Lawton Brody, cognitive impairment, and frailty) and Charlson Index were worse in this group (all, P = .001). They had poorer clinical status on admission, with worse Killip class and lower left ventricle ejection fraction (all, P = .001), and developed new-onset AF more often during admission (12.4% vs. 6.6%, P = .024). At six months follow-up, patients in group 2 had higher reinfarction, all-cause mortality, and mortality or readmission rates. A CHA2DS2-VASc Score > 4 was associated with mortality or readmission at 6 months (HR 2.07, P < .001). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, this last association was not significant (P = .175). Conclusions A CHA2DS2-VASc Score > 4 is present in half of octogenarians with NSTEACS and is associated with poorer outcomes. However, it is not an independent predictor of events and should not replace recommended tools for risk prediction in this setting. Sin financiación 3.149 JCR (2021) Q2, 77/172 Medicine, General & Internal 0.646 SJR (2021) Q2, 979/2489 Medicine (miscellaneous) No data IDR 2021 UEM

Background: There is scarce information on the prognostic role of frailty and Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in elderly patients Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Methods: The aim was to analyse the management of elderly patients with frailty and AF who suffered an ACS using data of the prospective multicentre LONGEVO-SCA registry. We evaluated the predictive performance of FRAIL, Charlson scores and AF status for adverse events at 6 months follow-up. Results: A total of 531 unselected patients with ACS and above 80 years old [mean age 84.4 (SD=3.6) years; 322 (60.6%) male] were enrolled, of whom 128 (24.1%) with AF and 145 (27.3%) with frailty. Mutually exclusive number of patients were as follows: non-Frail and sinus rhythm (SR) 304 (57.2%); Frail and SR 99 (18.6%); non-Frail and AF 82 (15.4%); Frail and AF 46 (8.7%). Frail and AF patients compared with non-frail and SR patients had higher risk of all-cause mortality [HR 2.61, (95%CI 1.28-5.31; p=0.008)], readmissions [HR 2.28, (95%CI 1.37-3.80); p=0.002)] and its composite [HR 2.28, (95%CI 1.44-3.60); p

Introduction and objectives The COVID-19 outbreak has had an unclear impact on the treatment and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess changes in STEMI management during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods Using a multicenter, nationwide, retrospective, observational registry of consecutive patients who were managed in 75 specific STEMI care centers in Spain, we compared patient and procedural characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in 2 different cohorts with 30-day follow-up according to whether the patients had been treated before or after COVID-19. Results Suspected STEMI patients treated in STEMI networks decreased by 27.6% and patients with confirmed STEMI fell from 1305 to 1009 (22.7%). There were no differences in reperfusion strategy (> 94% treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in both cohorts). Patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 outbreak had a longer ischemic time (233 [150-375] vs 200 [140-332] minutes, P

Background: Statins are recommended for secondary prevention. Our aims were to describe the proportion of very elderly patients receiving statins after non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NST-ACS) and to determine the prognostic implications of statins use. Methods: This prospective registry was performed in 44 hospitals that included patients ≥80 years discharged after a NST-ACS from April 2016 to September 2016. Results: We included 523 patients, the mean age was 84.2 ± 4.0 years and 200 patients (38.2%) were women. Previous statin treatment was recorded in 282 patients (53.4%), and 135 (32.5%) had LDL cholesterol levels >2.6 mmol/L. Mean LDL cholesterol levels during admission were 2.3 ± 0.9 mmol/L. Statins were prescribed at discharge to 474 patients (90.6%). Compared with patients discharged on statins, those that did not receive statins were more often frail (22 [47.8%] vs. 114 [24.4%], p < 0.01) and underwent an invasive approach less frequently (30 [61.2%] vs. 374 [78.9%], p = 0.01). During a 6-month follow-up, 50 patients died (9.5%). There was a nonsignificant trend to higher mortality in patients not treated with statins (6 [15%] vs. 44 [9.6%], p = 0.30), but statins were not independently associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–2.11, p = 0.65), nor with a reduction in the combined endpoint mortality/hospitalizations (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.52–1.55, p = 0.69). Conclusions: Although most octogenarians presenting a NST-ACS are already on statins before the episode, their LDL cholesterol is frequently >2.6 mmol/L. Octogenarians who do not receive statins have a high-risk profile, with significant frailty and comorbidity.

Introduction and objectives Contemporary data on the incidence and prognosis of heart failure (HF) and the influence of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are scant. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between LVEF and HF with long-term prognosis in a cohort of patients with ACS. Methods This is a retrospective observational study of 6208 patients consecutively admitted for ACS to 2 different Spanish hospitals. Baseline characteristics were examined and a follow-up period was established for registration of death and HF rehospitalization as the primary endpoint. Results Among the study participants, 5064 had ACS without HF during hospitalization: 290 (5.8%) had LVEF < 40%, 540 (10.6%) LVEF 40% to 49%, and 4234 (83.6%) LVEF ≥ 50%. The remaining 1144 patients developed HF in the acute phase: 395 (34.6%) had LVEF < 40%, 251 (21.9%) LVEF 40% to 49%, and 498 (43.5%) LVEF ≥ 50%. Patients with LVEF 40% to 49% had a demographic and clinical profile with intermediate features between the LVEF < 40% and LVEF ≥ 50% groups. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that mortality and HF readmissions were statistically different depending on LVEF in the non-HF group but not in the HF group. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% was an independent prognostic factor in the non-HF group only. Conclusions In ACS, long-term prognosis is considerably worse in patients who develop HF during hospitalization than in patients without HF, irrespective of LVEF. This parameter is a strong prognostic predictor only in patients without HF.

Contemporary data on the incidence and prognosis of heart failure (HF) and the influence of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are scant. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between LVEF and HF with long-term prognosis in a cohort of patients with ACS.This is a retrospective observational study of 6208 patients consecutively admitted for ACS to 2 different Spanish hospitals. Baseline characteristics were examined and a follow-up period was established for registration of death and HF rehospitalization as the primary endpoint.Among the study participants, 5064 had ACS without HF during hospitalization: 290 (5.8%) had LVEF40%, 540 (10.6%) LVEF 40% to 49%, and 4234 (83.6%) LVEF ≥ 50%. The remaining 1144 patients developed HF in the acute phase: 395 (34.6%) had LVEF40%, 251 (21.9%) LVEF 40% to 49%, and 498 (43.5%) LVEF ≥ 50%. Patients with LVEF 40% to 49% had a demographic and clinical profile with intermediate features between the LVEF40% and LVEF ≥ 50% groups. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that mortality and HF readmissions were statistically different depending on LVEF in the non-HF group but not in the HF group. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% was an independent prognostic factor in the non-HF group only.In ACS, long-term prognosis is considerably worse in patients who develop HF during hospitalization than in patients without HF, irrespective of LVEF. This parameter is a strong prognostic predictor only in patients without HF.

Background: A worse prognosis has been reported among women with acute coronary syndrome compared to men. Our aim was to address the role of frailty and sex in the management and prognosis of elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Methods: A prospective registry in 44 Spanish hospitals including patients aged 80 years and older with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Frailty assessment was performed using the FRAIL scale. Results: Of a total of 535 patients, 207 (38.7%) were women. Mean age was 84.8±4.0 years, similar in men and women. A prior history of coronary artery disease was more common in men (146, 44.9%) than in women (46, 22.2%), PConclusions: In octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome female sex was independently associated with death/hospitalisation at 6 months. Frailty was more common in women and was a predictor of poor prognosis. In men prefrailty also predicted a poor prognosis.

Aims: Current guidelines recommend an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). The role of an invasive strategy in frail elderly patients remains controversial. The aim of this substudy was to assess the impact of an invasive strategy on outcomes according to the degree of frailty in these patients. Methods and results: The LONGEVO-SCA registry included unselected NSTEACS patients aged =80 years. A geriatric assessment, including frailty, was performed during hospitalisation. During the admission, we evaluated the impact of an invasive strategy on the incidence of cardiac death, reinfarction or new revascularisation at six months. From 531 patients included, 145 (27.3%) were frail. Mean age was 84.3 years. Most patients underwent an invasive strategy (407/531, 76.6%). Patients undergoing an invasive strategy were younger and had a lower proportion of frailty (23.3% vs. 40.3%, p

Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of the Xience Prime everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in long coronary lesions in a real-world population. Background Long lesions are considered difficult technically and in terms of achieving successful clinical outcomes. With first generation DES, MACE can be as high as 10% at a short-medium term follow-up. There are a few data available in this subset regarding the use of second generation DES METHODS: A prospective, multicenter registry of consecutive patients (aged 64.8 ± 11.2 years, 77% men and 33% diabetics) in 29 tertiary hospitals with de novo > 24 mm lesions in vessels of 2.25-4 mm was performed. The primary and secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1, 12, and 24 months. Patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy during 12 months. Results A total of 610 patients with 705 long lesions were included (1.2 per patient). Lesion length was 34.59 ± 11.17 mm and vessel size 2.93 ± 0.41 mm. Stented length was 39.83 ± 14.08 mm (1.4 stents per lesion). Predilatation/postdiltatation was performed in 75 and 33% of the cases, intravascular ultrasound in 15%. The device success rate was 99.1%. MACE and ST rates at 1, 12, and 24-months follow-up were 0.3, 2.1, and 5.4% and 0.2, 0.7, and 1.5%, respectively. Conclusion In this real-world population, the Xience Prime EES performs extremely well in long lesions, with a very low rate of both MACE and ST.

Resumen Introduccion y objetivos Las neoplasias malignas son la segunda causa de muerte en los paises desarrollados, por detras de las enfermedades cardiovasculares, y ambas entidades tienen factores en comun. Metodos Estudio prospectivo de todos los pacientes ingresados por un sindrome coronario agudo en el que se evaluo la prevalencia de neoplasias y la incidencia tras el alta. Resultados La prevalencia de neoplasias en los 1.819 pacientes incluidos fue del 3,4% y el 41,9% de los casos se consideraron libres de enfermedad. Entre los 1.731 pacientes dados de alta, la incidencia fue 3,1% (53 casos) y las localizaciones mas frecuentes fueron colon, pulmon, vejiga y pancreas. Los pacientes con neoplasias prevalentes presentaron mas edad, comorbilidades y complicaciones. No se observaron diferencias en el porcentaje de revascularizacion, pero si menor uso de stents farmacoactivos en los pacientes con neoplasias prevalentes. Durante el seguimiento, la mediana de tiempo hasta el diagnostico de nuevas neoplasias fue de 25 meses y el analisis multivariante identifico como factores independientes la edad y el ser fumador o exfumador. La mortalidad por cualquier causa tras el alta fue muy superior en los pacientes con neoplasias incidentes (64,2%) o prevalentes (40,0%). El analisis multivariante mostro que en las neoplasias prevalentes e incidentes se multiplicaba por 4 el riesgo de mortalidad por cualquier causa. Conclusiones El 3,8% de los pacientes tuvieron neoplasias prevalentes y menos del 50% se consideraban curadas en el momento del ingreso. La incidencia de nuevas neoplasias fue del 3,4% y ambas formas de neoplasias empeoraron mucho el pronostico a largo plazo.

Introduction and objectives Malignancies are the second cause of death in developed countries after cardiovascular disease and both share common risk factors. Methods This prospective study assessed the prevalence and postdischarge incidence of malignancies in all consecutive patients admitted for an acute coronary syndrome. Results A total of 1819 patients were included. On admission, the prevalence of malignancies was 3.4%, and 41.9% of the patients were considered disease-free; of the 1731 discharged patients, the incidence was 3.1% (53 cases) and the most common locations were the colon, lung, bladder, and pancreas. Patients with prevalent malignancies were older and had more comorbidities and complications. There were no differences in the revascularization rate, but implantation of drug-eluting stents was less frequent in patients with prevalent malignancies. During follow-up, the median time to diagnosis of incident malignancies was 25 months. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors were age and current or former smoking. All-cause mortality was much higher in patients with incident (64.2%) or prevalent (40.0%) malignancies. Multivariate analysis showed that prevalent and incident malignancies increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 4-fold. Conclusions Among patients admitted for an acute coronary syndrome, 3.8% had a history of malignancy, with less than 50% considered cured. The incidence of new malignancies was 3.4% and both types of malignancies substantially impaired the long-term prognosis.

Introduction: HF remains a frequent complication following MI and adversely affects prognosis. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of HF following MI and to design a risk score for its prediction. Methods: Retrospective study of all consecutive patients admitted forMI. Primary end pointwas time to incident HF. Patients with previous history of HF were excluded. Death was modelled as competing risk. Results: 5737 patients were included. Mean age was 66.32 +/- 12.80. During a median follow-up of 47.0 months (23.0-73.0), 686 patients (12%) developed HF. Age, diabetes mellitus, peripheral artery disease, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, persistent atrial fibrillation, haemoglobin, troponin peak, diuretic at admission, ventricular function, and revascularizationwere independent predictors for HF development. According to this multivariate regression analysis, we developed a novel score that allows for the identification of patients at high (>= 16), medium (9-15) and low risk (

Objectives No previous studies have assessed the role of the FRAIL scale in predicting long-term outcomes in older patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Design, Setting and Participants The multicenter observational LONGEVO-SCA registry included unselected patients ≥80 years of age with ACS from 44 centers. A comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed during hospitalization. Measures Frailty was measured by the FRAIL scale. For the purpose of this study, main outcome measured was mortality or readmission at 24 months. Results A total of 498 patients were included. Mean age was 84.3 years. A total of 198 patients (33.1%) were prefrail and 135 (27.1%) frail. Patients who were prefrail and frail had a higher degree of comorbidities, and higher prevalence of disability, cognitive impairment, and nutritional risk. A total of 165 out of 498 patients (33.1%) died, and 331 patients (66.7%) died or were readmitted at 24 months. Both prefrailty and frailty were associated with a higher mortality compared with robust patients (P < .001). The incidence of mortality or readmission was also higher in patients who were prefrail or frail (P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the association between frailty and mortality or readmission remained significant (hazard ratio 1.28 for prefrailty and hazard ratio 1.96 for frailty, P < .001). The FRAIL scale showed an optimal ability for predicting mortality or readmission (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.83‒0.89). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score was 0.89. No significant differences were observed between both AUC values (P = .163). Conclusions and Implications The FRAIL scale independently predicted long-term outcomes in older patients with ACS. The predictive ability of this scale was comparable to the strongly recommended Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score. Frailty assessment is mandatory for improving risk prediction in these complex patients. Sin financiación 4.669 JCR (2020) Q2, 15/53 Geriatrics & Gerontology 1.840 SJR (2020) Q1, 9/108 Geriatrics and Gerontology No data IDR 2020 UEM

Background: Intravenous infusion of adenosine is considered standard practice for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment but is associated with adverse side-effects and is time-consuming. Intracoronary bolus injection of adenosine is better tolerated by patients, cheaper, and less time-consuming. However, current literature remains fragmented and modestly sized regarding the equivalence of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine. We aim to investigate the relationship between intracoronary adenosine and intravenous adenosine to determine FFR. Methods: We performed a lesion-level meta-analysis to compare intracoronary adenosine with intravenous adenosine (140 µg/kg per minute) for FFR assessment. The search was conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Lesion-level data were obtained by contacting the respective authors or by digitization of scatterplots using custom-made software. Intracoronary adenosine dose was defined as; low: Results: We collected 1972 FFR measurements (1413 lesions) comparing intracoronary with intravenous adenosine from 16 studies. There was a strong correlation (correlation coefficient =0.915; P P Conclusions: The present study documents clinically irrelevant differences in FFR values obtained with intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine. Intracoronary adenosine hence confers a practical and patient-friendly alternative for intravenous adenosine for FFR assessment.

Aims Anemia is associated with poorer outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but the magnitude of this association in elderly patients remains poorly understood. No study has assessed the prognostic impact of anemia according to frailty status in this setting. Methods The LONGEVO-SCA registry included unselected ACS patients aged at least 80 years. A geriatric assessment was performed during hospitalization, including frailty assessment using the FRAIL scale. Anemia was defined by the WHO criteria. We evaluated the impact of anemia on 6-month mortality according to the presence of frailty. Results A total of 517 patients were assessed. Mean age was 84.3 years, and a total of 236 patients (45.6%) had anemia. Patients with anemia had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher prevalence of frailty (30.6 vs. 22.3%, P = 0.007). A total of 60 patients (12.1%) died at 6 months [40 with anemia (17.5%) and 20 without anemia (7.5%), P = 0.001]. Anemia was independently associated with mortality at 6 months in the whole cohort (hazard ratio 2.28, 95% CI 1.13-457, P = 0.021). The association of anemia and mortality was different according to frailty status, being significant in patients without frailty (hazard ratio 3.94, 95% CI 1.84-8.45, P = 0.001), but not in frail patients (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 0.53-2.57, P = 0.705), (P value for interaction = 0.035). Conclusion A high proportion of elderly patients with ACS have anemia, leading to a worse prognosis in the whole cohort. The association between anemia and mortality was especially significant in robust patients, whereas the poorer prognosis in frail patients was not modified by the presence of anemia.

Background Elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) may present delirium but its clinical relevance is unknown. This study aimed at determining the clinical associated factors, and prognostic implications of delirium in old-aged patients admitted for NSTE-ACS. Methods LONGEVO-SCA is a prospective multicenter registry including unselected patients with NSTE-ACS aged ≥ 80 years. Clinical variables and a complete geriatric evaluation were assessed during hospitalization. The association between delirium and 6-month mortality was assessed by a Cox regression model weighted for a propensity score including the potential confounding variables. We also analysed its association with 6-month bleeding and cognitive or functional decline. Results Among 527 patients included, thirty-seven (7%) patients presented delirium during the hospitalization. Delirium was more frequent in patients with dementia or depression and in those from nursing homes (27.0% vs. 3.1%, 24.3% vs. 11.6%, and 11.1% vs. 2.2%, respectively; all P < 0.05). Delirium was significantly associated with in-hospital infections (27.0% vs. 5.3%, P < 0.001) and usage of diuretics (70.3% vs. 49.8%, P = 0.02). Patients with delirium had longer hospitalizations [median 8.5 (5.5–14) vs. 6.0 (4.0–10) days, P = 0.02] and higher incidence of 6-month bleeding and mortality (32.3% vs. 10.0% and 24.3% vs. 10.8%, respectively; both P < 0.05) but similar cognitive or functional decline. Delirium was independently associated with 6-month mortality (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02–2.13, P = 0.04) and 6-month bleeding events (OR = 2.87; 95% CI: 1.98–4.16, P < 0.01). Conclusions In-hospital delirium in elderly patients with NSTE-ACS is associated with some preventable risk factors and it is an independent predictor of 6-month mortality.

Introduction and objectives: The proportion of elderly patients undergoing primary angioplasty is growing. The present study describes the clinical profile, procedural characteristics, outcomes, and predictors of outcome. Methods: A 31-center registry of consecutive patients older than 75 years treated with primary angioplasty. Clinical and procedural data were collected, and the patients underwent clinical follow-up. Results: The study included 3576 patients (39.3% women, 48.5% with renal failure, 11.5% in Killip III or IV, and 29.8% with > 6 hours of chest pain). Multivessel disease was present in 55.4% and nonculprit lesions were additionally treated in 24.8%. Radial access was used in 56.4%, bivalirudin in 11.8%, thromboaspiration in 55.9%, and drug-eluting stents in 26.6%. The 1-month and 2-year incidences cardiovascular death were 10.1% and 14.7%, respectively. The 2-year rates of definite or probable thrombosis, repeat revascularization, and BARC bleeding > 2 were 3.1%, 2.3%, and 4.2%, respectively. Predictive factors were diabetes mellitus, renal failure, atrial fibrillation, delay to reperfusion > 6 hours, ejection fraction < 45%, Killip class III-IV, radial access, bivalirudin, drug-eluting stents, final TIMI flow of III, and incomplete revascularization at discharge. Conclusions: Notable registry findings include frequently delayed presentation and a high prevalence of adverse factors such as renal failure and multivessel disease. Positive procedure-related predictors include shorter delay, use of radial access, bivalirudin, drug-eluting stents, and complete revascularization before discharge. (C) 2016 Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.