Search

The prevalence of burnout and depression among abdominal transplant surgeons has been well described. However, the incidence of early-career transplant surgeons leaving the field is unknown. The objective of this study was to quantify the incidence of attrition among early-career abdominal transplant surgeons.A custom database from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network with encrypted surgeon-specific identifiers was queried for transplant surgeons who entered the field between 2008 and 2019. Surgeons who experienced attrition, defined as not completing a subsequent transplant after a minimum of 5, were identified. Surgeon-specific case volumes, case mix, and recipient outcomes were modeled to describe their association with attrition.Between 2008 and 2018, 496 abdominal transplant surgeons entered the field and performed 76,465 transplant procedures. A total of 24.4% (n = 121) experienced attrition, with a median time to attrition of 2.75 years. Attrition surgeons completed fewer kidney (7 vs 21, P.01), pancreas (0.52 vs 1.43, P.01), and liver transplants (1 vs 4, P.01) in their first year of practice. Attrition surgeons completed a smaller proportion of their transplant center's volume (9% vs 18%, P.01) and were less likely to participate in pediatric transplants (26.5% vs 52.5%, P.01) and living donor kidney transplants (64.5% vs 84.5%, P.01). On multivariable analysis, performing fewer kidney (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-0.99) and liver transplants (odds ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.98) by year 5 and completing a smaller proportion of their centers' volume (odds ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.98) were associated with attrition. Furthermore, attrition surgeons had worse allograft and patient survival for liver transplant recipients (both log-rank P.01).This investigation was the first to quantify the high incidence of attrition experienced by early-career abdominal transplant surgeons and its association with surgeon-specific case volumes, case mix, and worse recipient outcomes. These findings suggested the abdominal transplant workforce is struggling to retain their fellowship-trained surgeons.

There is concern regarding the competency of today's general surgery graduates as a large proportion defer independent practice in favor of additional fellowship training. Little is known about the graduates who directly enter general surgery practice and if their operative experiences during residency differ from graduates who pursue fellowship.Nineteen Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery programs from the US Resident OPerative Experience Consortium were included. Demographics, career choice, and case logs from graduates between 2010 to 2020 were analyzed.There were 1,264 general surgery residents who graduated over the 11-year period. A total of 248 (19.6%) went directly into practice and 1,016 (80.4%) pursued fellowship. Graduates directly entering practice were more likely to be a high-volume resident (43.1% vs 30.5%, P.01) and graduate from a high-volume program (49.2% vs 33.0%, P.01). Direct-to-practice graduates performed 53 more cases compared with fellowship-bound graduates (1,203 vs 1,150, P.01). On multivariable analysis, entering directly into practice was positively associated with total surgeon chief case volume (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.84, P.01) and graduating from a US medical school (odds ratio = 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.45-4.44, P.01) while negatively associated with completing a dedicated research experience (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.45, P.01).This is the first multi-institutional study exploring resident operative experience and career choice. These data suggest residents who desire immediate practice can tailor their experience with less research time and increased operative volume. These data may be helpful for programs when designing their experience for residents with different career goals.

Background In March 2020, the COVID-19 virus global pandemic forced healthcare systems to institute regulations including the cancellation of elective surgical cases, which likely decreased resident operative experience. The objective of this study was to determine if the COVID-19 pandemic affected operative experiences of U.S. general surgery residents. Methods The operative experience of general surgery residents was examined nationally and locally. Aggregate Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for 2018-2019 (pre-COVID) and 2019-2020 (COVID) graduates were compared using national mean cumulative operative volume for total major and surgeon chief cases. Locally, ACGME case logs were used to analyze the operative experience among residents at a single, academic center. Average operative volumes per month per resident during peak COVID-19 quarantine months were compared with those the previous year. Results Compared with 2019 graduates, 2020 graduates completed 1.5% fewer total major cases (1055 ± 155 vs 1071 ± 150, p=0.011). This was most evident during chief year, with 8.4% fewer surgeon chief cases logged in 2020 compared to 2019 (264 ± 67 vs 289 ± 69, p < 0.001). Institutional data revealed that during the peak of the pandemic, residents across all levels completed 42.5% fewer total major operations (12 ± 11 vs 20 ± 14, p < 0.001). This effect was more pronounced among junior residents compared with senior and chief residents. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased resident case volume. The ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic for operative competency and autonomy should be carefully examined., Our study examined the operative volume of U.S. general surgery residents during the COVID-19 pandemic by using ACGME case logs and found that reported resident operative volume decreased during the pandemic both nationally and locally. This finding is important as it impacts future resident education and operative competence for those affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and will need to be addressed by educators and learners moving forward.

Fellowship training established by the American Society of Transplant Surgeons and certified by the Transplant Accreditation and Certification Council provides trainees with broad exposure and practice readiness for the core aspects of abdominal transplantation. However, the operative case mix of a new transplant surgeon early in practice is unknown. This study examined the volume and composition of the transplant case mix of early-career transplant surgeons to better inform residents interested in transplantation about potential career opportunities following fellowship. cas 209 early-career transplant surgeons were identified from the UNOS database containing encrypted surgeon-specific identifiers and were included in this study. At 5 years into practice, there were 85 (40.7%) kidney-predominant, 38 (18.2%) liver-predominant, and 86 (41.1%) multiorgan transplant surgeons. Comparing surgeon subgroups, multiorgan surgeons performed more transplants in year 5 of practice than both liver-predominant and kidney-predominant surgeons (both p .05). This is the first study to describe the transplant case composition of the early-career transplant surgeons. This data can be used to inform aspiring transplant surgeons about potential career opportunities and to assist fellowship programs in guiding and mentoring fellows.

Single-center data suggest that general surgery residents perform more cases related to their future fellowship compared with their peers. This study aimed to determine whether this experience was true for residents across multiple programs.Data from graduates of 18 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited general surgery residency programs in the US Resident OPerative Experience (ROPE) Consortium were analyzed. Residents were categorized as entering 1 of 12 fellowships or entering directly into general surgery practice. Case log operative domains were mapped to each fellowship, and analyses were performed between groups.Of 1,192 graduated general surgery residents, 955 (80%) pursued fellowship training whereas 235 (20%) went directly into general surgery practice. The top 3 fellowships pursued were trauma/surgical critical care (18%), vascular surgery (13%), and minimally invasive surgery (12%). Residents entering minimally invasive surgery performed the most total cases, whereas residents pursuing breast performed the least (1,209 [1,056-1,325] vs 1,091 [1,006-1,171], plt; 0.01). For each fellowship type, graduates completed more total fellowship-specific cases in their future specialty compared with their peers (all plt; 0.05). This association was observed for all 12 fellowships at the surgeon chief level (all plt; 0.05) and for 10 of 12 fellowships at the surgeon junior level (all plt; 0.05).General surgery residents perform more cases related to their future specialty choice compared with their peers. These data suggest that the specialization process begins during residency. This tendency among residents should be considered as general surgery residency undergoes structural redesign in the future.

To develop a scalable metric which quantifies kidney transplant (KT) centers' performance providing equitable access to KT for minority patients, based on the individualized prelisting prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD).Racial and ethnic disparities for access to transplant in patients with ESRD are well described; however, variation in care among KT centers remains unknown. Furthermore, no mechanism exists that quantifies how well a KT center provides equitable access to KT for minority patients with ESRD.From 2013 to 2018, custom datasets from the United States Renal Data System and United Network for Organ Sharing were merged to calculate the Kidney Transplant Equity Index (KTEI), defined as the number of minority patients transplanted at a center relative to the prevalence of minority patients with ESRD in each center's health service area. Markers of socioeconomic status and recipient outcomes were compared between high and low KTEI centers.A total of 249 transplant centers performed 111,959 KTs relative to 475,914 nontransplanted patients with ESRD. High KTEI centers performed more KTs for Black (105.5 vs 24, P0.001), Hispanic (55.5 vs 7, P0.001), and American Indian (1.0 vs 0.0, P0.001) patients than low KTEI centers. In addition, high KTEI centers transplanted more patients with higher unemployment (52 vs 44, P0.001), worse social deprivation (53 vs 46, P0.001), and lower educational attainment (52 vs 43, P0.001). While providing increased access to transplant for minority and low socioeconomic status populations, high KTEI centers had improved patient survival (hazard ratio: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.95).The KTEI is the first metric to quantify minority access to KT incorporating the prelisting ESRD prevalence individualized to transplant centers. KTEIs uncover significant national variation in transplant practices and identify highly equitable centers. This novel metric should be used to disseminate best practices for minority and low socioeconomic patients with ESRD.

Transplant surgery fellowship is physically and emotionally demanding. The objective of this study was to characterize biophysiological stress and sleep patterns among transplant surgery fellows.Participating fellows wore a biophysical monitor over a 28-day period and completed biweekly surveys. Sleep patterns were dichotomized as normal or sleep deprived, and heart rate variability (HRV) was used to assess stress.Seventeen fellows participated. Fellows were frequently sleep deprived (43.9% of nights) and stress was near universal (87.2% of days). Burnout was reported by 2 fellows (11.8%). Only 4 fellows (23.5%) reported compliance with the Transplant Accreditation and Certification Council managed time policy; these fellows experienced fewer days of stress than non-compliant fellows (79.8% vs 89.2% p = 0.02).This is the first study to quantify sleep deprivation and stress among transplant fellows. Future work is needed to evaluate the effects of sleep deprivation, and stress on burnout and patient outcomes.

Background Diversity in surgery has been shown to improve mentorship and patient care. Diversity has improved among general surgery (GS) trainees but is not the case for departmental leadership. We analyzed the race and gender distributions across leadership positions at academic GS programs. Methods Academic GS programs (n = 118) listed by the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access system were included. Leadership positions were ascertained from department websites. Gender and race were determined through publicly provided data. Results Ninety-two (79.3%) department chairs were white and 99 (85.3%) were men. Additionally, 88 (74.6%) program directors and 34 (77.3%) vice-chairs of education were men. A higher proportion of associate program directors were women (38.5%). Of 787 division-chiefs, 73.4% were white. Only trauma had >10% representation from minority surgeons. Women represented >10% of division chiefs in colorectal, thoracic, pediatric, and plastic/burn surgery. Conclusion Diversity among GS trainees is not yet reflected in departmental leadership. Effort is needed to improve disparities in representation across leadership roles.

Burnout among surgeons has been attributed to increased workload and decreased autonomy. Although prior studies have examined burnout among transplant surgeons, no studies have evaluated burnout in abdominal transplant surgery fellows. The objective of our study was to identify predictors of burnout and understand its impact on personal and patient care during fellowship. A survey was sent to all abdominal transplant surgery fellows in an American Society of Transplant Surgeons-accredited fellowship. The response rate was 59.2% (n = 77) and 22.7% (n = 17) of fellows met criteria for burnout. Fellows with lower grit scores were more likely to exhibit burnout compared with fellows with higher scores (3.6 vs 4.0, P = .026). Those with burnout were more likely to work >100 hours per week (58.8% vs 27.6%, P = .023), have severe work-related stress (58.8% vs 22.4%, P = .010), consider quitting fellowship (94.1% vs 20.7%, P < .001), or make a medical error (35.3% vs 5.2%, P = .003). This national analysis of abdominal transplant fellows found that burnout rates are relatively low, but few fellows engage in self-care. Personal and program-related factors attribute to burnout and it has unacceptable effects on patient care. Transplant societies and fellowship programs should develop interventions to give fellows tools to prevent and combat burnout.

There is considerable variability in surgeons' approach to write and obtain informed consent for surgery, particularly among resident trainees. We analyzed differences in procedures and complications described in documented surgical consents for cholecystectomy between residents and attendings. We hypothesized that attending consents would describe more comprehensive procedures and complications than those done by residents.This is a retrospective analysis of 334 patients who underwent cholecystectomy. Charts were queried for demographics, surgical approach, whether the consent was completed electronically, and which provider completed the consent. Specifically, consents were evaluated for inclusion of possible conversion to open procedure, intraoperative cholangiogram, bile duct injury, injury to nearby structures, reoperation, bile leak, as well as if the consent matched the actual procedure performed.This study was conducted at an accredited general surgery training program at an academic tertiary care center in the Midwest.This was a review of 334 patients who underwent cholecystectomy over a 1 year period.Of all documented consents analyzed, 153 (47%) specifically included possible intraoperative cholangiogram, 156 (47%) included bile duct injury, 76 (23%) included injury to nearby structures, 22 (7%) included reoperation, and 62 (19%) included bile leak. In comparing residents and attendings, residents were more likely to consent for bile duct injury (p = 0.002), possible intraoperative cholangiogram (p = 0.0007), injury to nearby structures (p0.0001), reoperation (p0.0001), and bile leak (p0.0001).Significant variation exists between documentation between resident and attending cholecystectomy consents, with residents including more complications than attendings on their consent forms. These data suggest that experience alone does not predict content of written consents, particularly for common ambulatory procedures. Education regarding the purpose of informed consent and what should be included in one may lead to a reduction in variability between providers.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT) has become an effective mechanism for expanding the donor pool and decreasing waitlist mortality. However, it is unclear if low-volume DCD centers can achieve comparable outcomes to high-volume centers.From 2011 to 2019 utilizing the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, liver transplant centers were categorized into tertiles based on their annual volume of DCD LTs. Donor selection, recipient selection, and survival outcomes were compared between very-low volume (VLV, n = 1-2 DCD LTs per year), low-volume (LV, n = 3-5), and high-volume (HV, n 5) centers.One hundred and ten centers performed 3273 DCD LTs. VLV-centers performed 339 (10.4%), LV-centers performed 627 (19.2%), and HV-centers performed 2307 (70.4%) LTs. 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year patient and graft survival were significantly increased at HV-centers (all P .05). Recipients at HV-centers had shorter waitlist durations (P .01) and shorter hospital lengths of stay (P .01). On multivariable regression, undergoing DCD LT at a VLV-center or LV-center was associated with increased 1-year patient mortality (VLV-OR:1.73, 1.12-2.69) (LV-OR: 1.42, 1.01-2.00) and 1-year graft failure (VLV-OR: 1.79, 1.24-2.58) (LV-OR: 1.28, .95-1.72).Increased annual DCD liver transplant volume is associated with improved patient and graft survival.

Because of underutilization of liver allografts, our center previously showed that hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody-positive/nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative livers when transplanted into HCV nonviremic recipients were safe with a 10% risk of HCV transmission. Herein, we present our single-center prospective experience of using HCV NAT+ liver allografts transplanted into HCV NAT- recipients. An institutional review board-approved matched cohort study was conducted examining post- liver transplantation (LT) outcomes of HCV- patients who received HCV NAT+ organs (treatment group) compared with matched recipients with HCV NAT- organs (matched comparator group) between June 2018 to October 2019. The primary endpoint was success of HCV treatment and elimination of HCV infection. The secondary outcomes included the 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival as well as perioperative complications. There were 32 recipients enrolled into each group. Because of 1 death in the index admission, 30/31 patients (97%) were given HCV treatment at a median starting time of 47 days (18-140 days) after LT. A total of 19 (63%) patients achieved sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). Another 6 patients achieved end-of-treatment response, while 5 remained on therapy and 1 is yet to start treatment. No HCV treatment failure has been noted. There were no differences in 30-day and 1-year graft and patient survival, length of hospital stay, biliary or vascular complications, or cytomegalovirus viremia between the 2 groups. In this interim analysis of a matched cohort study, which is the first and largest study to date, the patients who received the HCV NAT+ organs had similar outcomes regarding graft function, patient survival, and post-LT complications.

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) is indicated for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and concurrent renal insufficiency. En bloc SLKT is an alternative to traditional separate implantations, but studies comparing the two techniques are limited. The en bloc technique maintains renal outflow via donor infrahepatic vena cava and inflow via anastomosis of donor renal artery to donor splenic artery. Comparison of recipients of en bloc (n = 17) vs traditional (n = 17) SLKT between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Recipient demographics and comorbidities were similar. More recipients of traditional SLKT were dialysis dependent (82.4% vs 41.2%, P = .01) with lower baseline pretransplant eGFR (14 vs 18, P = .01). En bloc SLKT was associated with shorter kidney cold ischemia time (341 vs 533 minutes, P < .01) and operative time (374 vs 511 minutes, P < .01). Two en bloc patients underwent reoperation for kidney allograft inflow issues due to kinking and renal steal. Early kidney allograft dysfunction (23.5% in both groups), 1-year kidney graft survival (88.2% vs 82.4%, P = 1.0), and posttransplantation eGFR were similar between groups. In our experience, the en bloc SLKT technique is safe and feasible, with comparable outcomes to the traditional method.

Objective We evaluated the medical student experience with a deceased-donor multiorgan procurement program at a single center. The program provided the opportunity to assist with organ procurement, but no formal curriculum was offered. Design, Setting, Participants In 2018, medical students who registered for the program between 2014 and 2017 completed a voluntary survey about the experience and its impact on surgery interest and organ donation knowledge and advocacy. Results Of 139 respondents, 53.3% (N = 74) of students participated in at least one procurement. The experience was resoundingly positive: 81.7% (N = 58) believed it exceeded expectations, with less than one-third missing class and only 4.3% (N = 3) reporting a negative impact on academics. Although 60.6% (N = 43) students studied prior to procurement, 57.8% (N = 41) expressed the need for increased preparation. Preferred learning modalities included videos, discussion with the transplant fellows, and focused anatomy overview. Following participation, 53.5% (N = 38) of students had increased interest in pursuing an acting internship and career in surgery. However, participation was not associated with improved familiarity with organ donation concepts or advocacy. Conclusions Adding a structured curriculum may turn medical students from passive observers into active learners, maximizing the educational value of procurement and better equipping future providers to promote organ donation.

Morbid obesity is a barrier to kidney transplant in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an increasingly considered intervention, but the safety and long-term outcomes are uncertain. We reviewed prospectively collected data on patients with ESRD and chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing SG from 2011 to 2018. There were 198 patients with ESRD and 45 patients with CKD (stages 1-4) who met National Institutes of Health guidelines for bariatric surgery and underwent SG; 72% and 48% achieved a body mass index of ≤ 40 and ≤ 35 kg/m2 , respectively. The mean percentages of total weight loss and excess weight loss were 18.9 ± 10.8% and 38.2 ± 20.3%, respectively. SG reduced hypertension (85.8% vs 52.1%), decreased antihypertensive medication use (1.6 vs 1.0) (P < .01 each), and reduced incidence of diabetes (59.6% vs 32.5%, P < .01). Of the 71 patients with ESRD who achieved a body mass index of ≤ 40 kg/m2 , 45 were waitlisted and received a kidney transplant, whereas 10 remain on the waitlist. Mortality rate after SG was 1.8 per 100 patient-years, compared with 7.3 for non-SG. Patients with stage 3a or 3b CKD exhibited improved glomerular filtration rate (43.5 vs 58.4 mL/min, P = .01). In conclusion, SG safely improves transplant candidacy while providing significant, sustainable effects on weight loss, reducing medical comorbidities, and possibly improving renal function in stage 3 patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic forced a sudden change from in-person to virtual interviews for the general surgery residency match. General surgery programs and applicants adopted multiple strategies to best mimic in-person recruitment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate applicant opinions of the virtual recruitment format.Postinterview survey responses for applicants interviewing at a single general surgery residency program in the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 cycles were evaluated. All interviewed applicants were sent an anonymous survey assessing the virtual interview structure, their impression of the program, and their opinions on recruitment in the future.The response rate was 31.2% (n = 60). Most (88.4%) respondents reported a more favorable view of the program after a virtual interview. Factors that were most likely to create a favorable impression were residents (89.6%) and culture (81.0%). 50.8% of applicants favored virtual-only interviews. The majority of applicants (60.3%), however, preferred the virtual interview remain a component of the application process, 34.4% recommended that virtual interviews be used as an initial screen before in-person invites, while 19.0% suggested applicants should interview in-person or virtually without penalty. 62.1% favored capping the number of interviews offered by programs and accepted by applicants.The virtual interview format for general surgery residency allows applicants to effectively evaluate a residency program. Applicants are in favor of a combination of virtual and in-person interviews in the future. Innovation in the recruitment process, including limiting the number of applications and incorporating virtual events, is supported by applicants.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the 1-year safety and effectiveness of HBV Nucleic Acid Test positive (HBV NAT+) allografts in seronegative kidney transplant (KT) and liver transplant (LT) recipients. Summary background data Despite an ongoing organ shortage, the utilization of HBV NAT+ allografts into seronegative recipients has not been investigated. Methods From January 2017 to October 2020, a prospective cohort study was conducted among consecutive KT and LT recipients at a single institution. Primary endpoints were post-transplant HBV viremia, graft and patient survival. Results With median follow-up of 1-year, there were no HBV-related complications in the 89 HBV NAT+ recipients. Only 9 of 56 KTs (16.1%) and 9 of 33 LTs (27.3%) experienced post-transplant HBV viremia at a median of 185 (KT) and 269 (LT) days postoperatively. Overall, viremic episodes resolved to undetected HBV DNA after a median of 80 days of entecavir therapy in 16 of 18 recipients. Presently, 100% of KT recipients and 93.9% of LT recipients are HBV NAT- with median follow-up of 13 months, whereas 0 KT and 8 LT (24.2%) recipients are HBV surface antigen positive indicating chronic infection. KT and LT patient and allograft survival were not different between HBV NAT+ and HBV NAT- recipients (P > 0.05), whereas HBV NAT+ KT recipients had decreased waitlist time and pretransplant duration on dialysis (P Conclusions This is the largest series describing the transplantation of HBV NAT+ kidney and liver allografts into HBV seronegative recipients without chronic HBV viremia or decreased 1-year patient and graft survival. Increasing the utilization of HBV NAT+ organs in nonviremic recipients can play a role in decreasing the national organ shortage.

OBJECTIVE To compare the operative experience of general surgery residents and practicing general surgeons. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The scope of general surgery has evolved, yet it remains unknown whether residents are being exposed to the right mix of operations during residency. METHODS A retrospective review of operative case logs submitted to the American Board of Surgery by US general surgery graduates and practicing general surgeons from 2013 to 2017 was performed. The operative experience of both cohorts was calculated as a proportion of total experience and ranked by frequency. The proportional experience between cohorts was analyzed using Factorial ANOVA. RESULTS During the five-year period, 5482 graduates applied for initial American Board of Surgery certification, and 4152 diplomates applied for re-certification. Among all operative domains, the graduate experience was similar to that of diplomates in 6 of 12 areas (abdomen, alimentary tract, endoscopy, endocrine, other, skin/soft tissue; all p > 0.05). Residents have greater experience in subspecialty areas (pediatric, thoracic, trauma, vascular and plastic at the expense of fewer breast procedures (p < 0.05). The 30 operations most commonly performed by graduates comprised 67% of their total operative experience. Among these, residents performed 25 cases ≥ 10 times, 14 cases ≥ 20 times, and 7 cases ≥ 40 times. CONCLUSIONS The operative experience of graduating US general surgery residents is largely similar to that of practicing general surgeons, particularly for core general surgery domains. These data offer reassurance that surgical training in the modern era appropriately exposes residents to the operations they may perform in practice.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has seen transplant volume decrease nationwide, resulting in a 2.2-fold increase in waitlist mortality. In particular, solid organ transplant patients are subjected to increased morbidity and mortality from infection. In the face of these challenges, transplant centers need to develop innovative protocols to ensure high-quality care. Methods A multidisciplinary protocol was developed that included the following: virtual selection meetings, coronavirus disease 2019 negative donors, pretransplant symptom screening, rapid testing on presentation, telehealth follow-up, and weekly community outreach town halls. All orthotopic liver transplants completed between January 2018 and August 2020 were included in the study (n = 344). The cohort was stratified from January 2018 to February 2020 as “pre-COVID-19,” and from March 2020 to August 2020 as “COVID-19.” Patient demographics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Results From March 2020 to August 2020, there was a significant decrease in average monthly referrals for orthotopic liver transplantation (29.8 vs 37.1, P = .01). However, listings (11.0 vs 14.3, P = .09) and transplant volume remained unchanged (12.2 vs 10.6, P = .26). Rapid testing was utilized on arrival for transplant, zero patients tested positively preoperatively, and median time from test result until abdominal incision was 4.5 h [interquartile range, 1.2, 9.2]. Simultaneously, telehealth visits increased rapidly, peaking at 85% of all visits. It is important to note that there was no difference in outcomes between cohorts. Conclusion Orthotopic liver transplant can be accomplished safely and effectively in the COVID-19 era without compromising outcomes through increasing utilization of telehealth, rapid COVID-19 testing, and multidisciplinary protocols for managing immunosuppressed patients.

The operative experience of today's general surgery resident has changed, but little is known about the modern experience as nonprimary surgeon. We set out to explore changes in the operative experience of general surgery residents as first assistant (FA) and teaching assistant (TA).This is a review of ACGME national operative log reports from 1990 to 2018. TA and FA cases were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using polynomial regression analysis and Kruskal-Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at p0.05.30,260 individuals completed general surgery residency during the study period with medians of 951 (interquartile range: 929-974) total major, 63 (31-184) FA, and 32 (25-48) TA cases. As a proportion of total cases completed, FA cases decreased from 21.8% of the total operative experience in 1990 to 2.5% in 2018, and TA cases declined from 7.4% of the total operative experience in 1990 to 3.5% in 2018. Regression modeling demonstrated that both operative roles decreased over time, but at a progressively decreasing rate, with FA cases reaching a "floor" around 2010 and TA cases reaching a "breakpoint" in 2008 at which time operative volume rebounded and began to increase. Among the core general surgery domains of abdomen and alimentary tract, compositional analysis revealed a decrease across each of the 11 operative subcategories (all p0.05) for FA, and for TA, a decrease in 6 of the 11 operative subcategories (stomach, small intestine, large intestine, anorectal, hernia, and biliary, all p0.05).Over the past 3 decades, the resident operative experience as nonprimary surgeon has decreased dramatically, with today's residents graduating with fewer FA and TA cases. As surgical training has traditionally relied heavily on an apprenticeship model for learning technical skills, it is essential that surgical educators recognize and rectify these trends.

The operative experience of today's surgery residents is different than years past. Although overall volume remains stable, the composition is changing. As such, trends in open versus laparoscopic surgery for general surgery residents were examined.The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education national operative log reports from 1994 to 2018 were analyzed for the 15 operations recorded as both open and laparoscopic. Operative volume was examined for total major, surgeon chief, and surgeon junior cases.From 1994 to 2018, 26,258 residents graduated with 955.2 ± 31.7 total major cases. The 15 identified operations comprised 38.4% of this volume. During the 25-year study period, laparoscopic volume increased (+9.67 cases per year), whereas open volume decreased (-3.25 cases per year, P.0001 for each). Similar trends were seen for both chief and surgeon junior cases (P.05 for both). For 2 of the 4 core general surgery operations examined (hernia and proctocolectomy), the open approach was still the dominant approach, providing residents an opportunity to perform open surgery in an era of increasing minimally invasive approaches.For select procedures, the frequency of laparoscopy has surpassed open surgery for general surgery residents. These trends raise the concern that when necessary, general surgery graduates may not have adequate experience converting to open.

IMPORTANCE: Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been implemented in patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases to increase the number of patients able to undergo liver resection. Liver transplant could be an alternative in selected patients with extensive liver-only disease, and we have recently shown promising survival outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare overall survival (OS) among patients with colorectal cancer and high liver metastasis tumor load who were treated with liver transplant or with PVE and liver resection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness research study assessed 50 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases who were previously enrolled in liver transplant studies between November 2006 and August 2019 at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. Those patients were compared with a retrospective cohort of 53 patients in the Oslo University Hospital PVE database from March 2006 through November 2015 with similar selection criteria who underwent PVE and liver resection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The OS among patients with high tumor load after liver transplant was compared with that among patients with high tumor load who underwent PVE and liver resection. High tumor load was defined as 9 or more metastatic tumors or a diameter of 5.5 cm or longer for the largest liver lesion. RESULTS: In the PVE cohort of 53 patients, the median age was 61.8 years (range, 34.3-71.3 years), and 36 patients (68%) were men. The 5-year OS rate among 38 patients who underwent liver resection after PVE was 44.6%. The 5-year OS rate for patients with high tumor load was 33.4% for those who underwent liver transplant and 6.7% for those who underwent PVE. Among patients with high tumor load and left-sided primary tumors, the 5-year OS rate was 45.3% for those receiving a liver allograft and 12.5% for those treated with PVE and liver resection. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with nonresectable disease, an extensive liver tumor load, and left-sided primary tumors had long OS after liver transplant, exceeding the survival outcome for those patients treated with PVE and liver resection.

Advances in surgical training have led to the recent emergence of surgical education research. While the importance of surgical education research is well recognized, not all surgical journals are publishing these works. The objective of this study was to analyze the volume and types of surgical education publications in general surgery and surgical subspecialty journals.A PubMed search string was developed to identify surgical education publications in general surgery (GS, n = 10) and surgical subspecialty (SS, n = 16) journals from 2015 to 2019. Publications were catalogued into 7 categories: curriculum and/or teaching, trainee assessment, program evaluation, wellness and/or burnout, resident research, case outcomes with resident involvement, and other. Journals were also categorized by impact factor into 3 groups. Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression and Wilcoxon rank-sum to analyze differences in education publication number and percent between GS and SS journals, as well as between different impact factor groups.The median proportion of surgical education publications was 1.2% (IQR 0.3-2.8%) of total publications for journals queried. The highest proportion of surgical education publications by a journal was 13.9%. All other journals had median ≤ 5.5%. GS journals had a significantly higher median percent of surgical education publications than SS journals (2.9% [IQR 1.7-4.8%] vs 0.5% [IQR 0.0-1.4%] p0.01). Additionally, no significant differences were found for number of surgical education publications when journals were categorized by IF (p0.05).Education research is an important component of the surgical literature, with similar publication rates among journals of different impact factors. Publication volume is higher among general surgery than surgical subspecialty journals. With the ever-changing paradigm of surgical training, a rigorous scientific approach is needed to ensure effective training of future surgeons. Subspecialty journals should promote surgical education research to further understand and develop training in their field.

Transplant surgery fellowship has evolved over the years and today there are 66 accredited training programs in the US and Canada. There is growing concern, however, about the number of US-trained general surgery residents pursuing transplant surgery. In this study, we examined the transplant surgery pipeline, comparing it with other surgical subspecialty fellowships, and characterized the resident transplantation experience.Datasets were compiled and analyzed from surgical fellowship match data obtained from the National Resident Matching Program and ACGME reports and relative fellowship competitiveness was assessed. The surgical resident training experience in transplantation was evaluated.From 2006 to 2018, a total of 1,094 applicants have applied for 946 transplant surgery fellowship positions; 299 (27.3%) were US graduates. During this period, there was a 0.8% decrease per year in US-trained surgical residents matching into transplant surgery (p = 0.042). In addition, transplant surgery was one of the least competitive fellowships compared with other National Resident Matching Program surgical subspeciality fellowships, as measured by the number of US applicants per available fellowship position, average number of fellowship programs listed on each applicant's rank list, and proportion of unfilled fellowship positions (each, p0.05). Finally, from 2015 to 2017, there were 57 general surgery residency programs that produced 77 transplant surgery fellows, but nearly one-half of the fellows (n = 36 [46.8%]) came from 16 (28.1%) programs.Transplant surgery is one of the least competitive and sought after surgical fellowships for US-trained residents. These findings highlight the need for dedicated efforts to increase exposure, mentorship, and interest in transplantation to recruit strong US graduates.

Background Applicants provide a photo with their application through the Electronic Residency Application Service, which may introduce appearance-based bias. We evaluated whether an unconscious appearance bias exists in surgical resident selection. Methods After the match, applicant data from the 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 application cycles were examined. Reviewers were not provided the applicant photo or self-identified race during the second cycle. Photos provided by candidates were then rated by 4 surgical subspecialty residents who had no prior exposure to applications or interview status. Photos were rated on perceived fitness level, visual appearance, and photo professionalism. An overall photo score was then calculated. Results In the study, 422 applications were reviewed and 164 received interview invitations during the 2018 to 2019 cycle. Alpha Omega Alpha membership (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–4.51), overall photo score (odds ratio, 2.29, 95% confidence interval, 1.43–3.66), research (odds ratio, 5.61, 95% confidence interval, 2.84–11.20), age (odds ratio, 0.86, 95% confidence interval, 0.76–0.99), and step 2 (odds ratio, 1.06, 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.09) were predictors for receiving an interview. For the 2019 to 2020 cycle, 398 applications were reviewed, and 75 applicants received an invitation. Step 2 (odds ratio, 1.07, 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.12), research (odds ratio, 2.78, 95% confidence interval, 1.40–5.55), age (odds ratio, 0.82, 95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.95), and overall photo score (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–4.52) remained predictors despite reviewers being blinded to the photo during this cycle. Conclusion Although objective metrics remain critical in determining interview invitations, overall perceived applicant appearance may influence the selection process. Although visual appearance was associated with receiving an interview, the Electronic Residency Application Service photo does not ultimately affect selection. This may suggest that appearance may influence other objective and subjective aspects of the application.

Of the 1.6 million patients >70 years of age who died of stroke since 2002, donor livers were retrieved from only 2402 (0.15% yield rate). Despite reports of successful liver transplantation (LT) with elderly grafts (EG), advanced donor age is considered a risk for poor outcomes. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services definitions of an "eligible death" for donation excludes patients >70 years of age, creating disincentives to donation. We investigated utilization and outcomes of recipients of donors >70 through analysis of a United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research-file of adult LTs from 2002 to 2014. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression was used to identify factors influencing outcomes of EG recipients. Three thousand one hundred four livers from donors >70, ≈40% of which were used in 2 regions: 2 (520/3104) and 9 (666/3104). Unadjusted survival was significantly worse among recipients of EG compared to recipients of younger grafts (P 70 years of age, the yield rate of EGs can be maximized and disincentives removed to help resolve the organ shortage crisis.

Marginal livers (ML) have been used to expand the donor pool. National utilization of MLs is variable, and in some centers, they are never used. We examined the outcomes of MLs in the largest single center series of MLs used to date and compared outcomes to standard (SL) and living donor (LD) livers.Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all liver transplants performed at our institution from 1998 to 2016. ML grafts were defined as livers from donors70, livers discarded regionally and shared nationally, livers with cold ischemic time12 hours, livers from hepatitis C virus positive donors, livers from donation after cardiac death donors, livers with30% steatosis, and livers split between 2 recipients.A total of 2050 liver transplant recipients were studied, of these 960 (46.8%) received ML grafts. ML recipients were more likely to have lower MELDs and have hepatocellular carcinoma. Most MLs used were from organs turned down regionally and shared nationally (69%) or donors70 (22%). Survival of patients receiving MLs did not significantly differ from patients receiving SL grafts (P = 0.08). ML and SL recipients had worse survival than LDs (P0.01). Despite nearly half of our recipients receiving MLs, overall survival was significantly better than national survival over the same time period (P = 0.04). Waitlist mortality was significantly lower in our series compared with national results (19% vs 24.0%, P0.0001).Outcomes of recipients of ML grafts are comparable to SL transplants. Despite liberal use of these grafts, we have been able to successfully reduce waitlist mortality while exceeding national post-transplant survival metrics.

This Week in SCORE (TWIS) is a biennial, general surgery curriculum comprised of weekly online modules, readings, and multiple-choice quizzes. In this study, we examined the impact of required TWIS on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores and well-being among categorical general surgery residents.TWIS quiz completion became required in 2017. Residents attended weekly lectures, and ABSITE performance was incentivized with educational stipends. Surveys were distributed to assess study preferences, learning styles, burnout, and grit. Thirty-six categorical general surgery residents who took ABSITE in both 2017 and 2018 were evaluated in a paired-sample, retrospective analysis.After requiring TWIS, median ABSITE percentile increased by 12% (65%-77%, p = 0.001). Weekly TWIS completion (59% vs 89%, p0.001) and quiz results (62% vs 69%, p = 0.005) also improved. During this time, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization declined significantly, yet overall burnout scores did not change. Of 21 survey respondents, 66.7% (n = 14) increased weekly study time by a median of 2.5 hours. However, less than half used Surgical Council on Resident Education as their primary study tool. Only 23.8% (n = 5) reported that mandatory TWIS modified their study behavior, while 90.4% (n = 19) felt the culture of education had improved.After TWIS participation became required, ABSITE performances improved. Formalized curriculum with frequent assessment may foster accountability among residents, enhancing educational climate, well-being, and test performance.

Background The ACGME instituted duty hour restrictions in 2003. This presents a challenge for surgical residents who must acquire a medical and technical knowledge base during their training. Although the effect of work hour limitations on operative volume has been examined, no study has examined whether duty hour reform has had an effect on operative volume variability. Study Design The ACGME operative log data of graduating general surgery residents from 1992 to 2015 were examined. Residents with the most and fewest total major cases were identified and case logs, learning styles, and evaluations were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression analysis, chi-square test, Student's t -test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Significance was defined as p Results One hundred and thirty-five residents graduated from 1992 to 2015. No change in overall operative volume was seen after the 2003 duty hour reform, however, there was an increase in operative variability. In addition, there was an increase in the variability of total major cases between the resident completing the most and fewest cases per class (183.3; p = 0.02) after the start of work hour restrictions. The residents who graduated with the highest operative volume were more likely to be action-based learners (odds ratio = 6.81; 95% CI, 2.84–16.34; p Conclusions After the implementation of the 80-hour workweek, we found a significant increase in operative variability. This might suggest a growing disparity in the operative experience among surgical residents and, consequently, a varying quality of graduating residents. Programs should therefore consider using learning styles and developing competency-based training curricula to ensure equitable training among all trainees.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education instituted the 80-h workweek for residency programs in 2003. This presented a unique challenge for surgery residents who must acquire a medical and technical knowledge base during training. Therefore, learning should be delivered in an environment congruent with an individual's learning style. In this study, we evaluated the learning styles of general surgery residents to determine how learning styles changed after the implementation to the 80-h workweek.Kolb learning style inventory was taken by general surgery residents at the University of Cincinnati's Department of Surgery, and results from 1999-2012 were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-squared, logistic regression and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Significance was defined as a P value of0.05.A total of 411 responses were obtained from 115 residents. Surgical residents were primarily converging (59.0%) and assimilating (19.1%) learners before 2003. However, there was a shift in predominate learning styles after the institution of the 80-h workweek to converging (43.9%) and accommodating (40.4%, P 0.001). Surgical residents were also more likely to be team-based learners after the start of the 80-h workweek (odds ratio = 2.13, P = 0.0016).After the institution of the 80-h workweek, most general surgery residents remained action-based learners. However, there was a shift within this majority toward a preference for team-based learning. This change paralleled the transition to a more team-based approach to patient care with the implementation of the 80-h workweek. These findings are important for surgical educators to consider in the development of surgical resident curriculum.

Background The University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database-Resource Manager (UHC CD-RM) is an administrative database increasingly queried for both research and administrative purposes, but it has not been comprehensively validated. To address this knowledge gap, we compared the UHC CD-RM with an institutional dataset to determine its validity and accuracy. Materials and methods Age, gender, and date of operation were used to identify patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2009–2011 in both the UHC CD-RM and our institutional pancreatic surgery database. Patient- and intervention-specific variables including perioperative mortality, complications, length of stay, discharge disposition, and readmission were compared between datasets. Results A total of 107 UHC CD-RM and 105 institutional patients met inclusion criteria. In both datasets 103 matched cases were present. Between the 103 matched cases, there was concordance with respect to median age ( P = 0.87), gender ( P = 0.89), race ( P = 0.84), overall length of stay ( P = 0.46), discharge disposition ( P = 0.95), 30-d readmission rate ( P = 0.87), and 30-d mortality ( P = 0.70). Most comorbidities and complications were captured; however, several disease-specific complications were absent within the UHC CD-RM. Conclusions Most of the clinically significant patient- and intervention-specific variables within the UHC CD-RM are reliably reported. With recognition of its limitations, the UHC CD-RM is a reliable surrogate for institutional medical records and should be considered a valuable research tool for health service researchers.

Aim Liver fibrosis occurs as a result of several chronic liver diseases and leads to portal hypertension, cirrhosis and liver failure, often requiring liver transplantation. Activated hepatic stellate cells (HSC) are known to contribute to liver fibrosis, but currently there are no effective therapies for the treatment of established liver fibrosis. Activation of the acidic sphingomyelinase (ASM) has been shown to be involved in HSC activation. In the present study we investigated whether treatment with the ASM inhibitor, amitriptyline (TCA), could prevent and/or reverse fibrosis induced in mice by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). Methods Mice were treated with CCl4 for 8 weeks to induce fibrosis. Concurrently, mice received drinking water with or without 180 mg/L TCA. Results Mice receiving TCA in the water had decreased hepatic collagen deposition and reduced liver mRNA expression of the fibrogenic mediators, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, collagen and tumor necrosis factor-α. TCA treatment also reduced HSC activation determined by α-smooth muscle actin staining. In a separate set of experiments, mice were treated with CCl4 for 5 weeks prior to treatment with TCA, to test whether TCA had any effect on established fibrosis. Remarkably, in mice with established fibrosis, treatment with TCA significantly reduced collagen deposition, HSC activation, and prevented portal hypertension and improved hepatic architecture. Treatment of isolated HSC in vitro with TCA completely inhibited TGF-β1-induced collagen expression and platelet-derived growth factor-β-β-induced proliferation. Conclusion The data suggest that ASM is a critical signaling component in HSC for the development of liver fibrosis and represents an important therapeutic target.

Purpose The perceptions and expectations of students on the surgery clerkship were evaluated and compared with those of surgical residents and faculty. Methods A voluntary and anonymous survey was distributed to third year medical students, general surgery residents, and surgery faculty. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ 2 and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests ( P value Results Medical students, surgery residents and faculty largely agreed on student responsibilities during morning rounds. However, more students (96.9%) than residents (86.2%) and faculty (77.3%) believed they should be writing progress notes, and fewer students (85%) than residents (100%) and faculty (95.5%) thought they should be taught during morning rounds ( P P = 0.04, respectively). The expected and actual educational experience on the surgical clerkship was similar. The amount of instruction provided each week by residents and faculty was similar to the amount expected by students; each group believed that surgical residents were good educators. Students, residents, and faculty agreed on many essential skills for a student to learn by the clerkship’s end; however, more students (85.8%) than residents (58.6%) and faculty (68.2%) viewed identifying surgical complications as an essential skill ( P Conclusions Overall, the expectations of the medical students, surgical residents, and surgical faculty on the surgery clerkship were well matched. However, there were some instances where the students thought they should be more involved in patient care than did the residents and the faculty. It is important for surgical educators to be aware of these discrepancies to fully maximize the educational experience of medical students.