Search

Purpose Although cathepsin C (CTSC) has been reported to maintain malignant biological properties in various cancers, its functions in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain obscure. We aimed to investigate the potential role of CTSC in HCC. Materials and Methods HCC tissue microarrays (n=122) were employed to analyze the correlation between CTSC expression and clinicopathological characteristics through immunohistochemistry staining. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, western blot assay, Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, colony formation, cell migration, and invasion assays, xenograft mice model were adopted to validate what had been indicated by the bioinformatic web tools. Results By bioinformatic tools and tissue microarrays, CTSC was found upregulated in HCC compared with normal liver tissues, and its higher expression was correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients (hazard ratio, 2.402; 95% confidence interval, 1.493 to 3.865; p < 0.001). By gain/loss-of-function assays, we implicated that CTSC functioned as an oncogene to promote the proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells. Mechanistically, we revealed that CTSC was involved in several cancer-related signaling pathways by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, among which tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)/p38 pathway was verified to be activated by CTSC. Furthermore, we found that TNF-α could activate CTSC expression in a concentration- dependent manner. Ralimetinib, an oral p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor could inhibit CTSC expression. These indicated a potential positive feedback loop between CTSC and TNF-α/MAPK (p38) signaling. Conclusion Taken together, CTSC plays an important role in the growth and metastasis of HCC and may be a promising therapeutic target upon HCC.

Purpose The primary objective was to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor, prexasertib, in combination with the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, ralimetinib, which may be safely administered to patients with advanced cancer. Methods This Phase 1, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation study of prexasertib+ralimetinib included patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer, followed by a planned cohort expansion in patients with colorectal or non-small-cell lung cancer with KRAS and/or BRAF mutations. Intravenous prexasertib was administered at 60 mg/m2 (days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle), together with oral ralimetinib every 12 h (days 1 to 14 at 100 mg [Cohort 1, n = 3] or 200 mg [Cohort 2, n = 6]). Dose escalations for each agent were planned using a model-based 3 + 3 escalation paradigm. Safety was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0X. Tumor response was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Results Nine patients were treated; 3 experienced dose-limiting toxicities, all in Cohort 2, prohibiting further dose escalation. The most common ≥Grade 3 adverse event was neutrophil count decreased; other reported ≥Grade 3 hematological toxicities included febrile neutropenia and anemia. The pharmacokinetics of prexasertib+ralimetinib was comparable to the monotherapy population profile for each agent. One patient achieved a best overall response of stable disease (for 2 cycles); there were no complete/partial responses. Conclusions This study did not achieve its primary objective of establishing an RP2D of combination prexasertib + ralimetinib that could be safely administered to patients with advanced cancer.

International audience; Background and purpose: This phase 1 trial aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; primary objective) of a p38-MAPK inhibitor, ralimetinib, with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (TMZ), in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients.Materials and methods: The study was designed as an open-label dose-escalation study driven by a Tite-CRM design and followed by an expansion cohort. Ralimetinib was administered orally every 12 h, 7 days a week, for 2 cycles of 2 weeks at a dose of 100, 200 or 300 mg/12 h. Patients received ralimetinib added to standard concurrent RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with TMZ (75 mg/m2/day) and 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (150–200 mg/m2 on days 1–5 every 28 days).Results: The MTD of ralimetinib was 100 mg/12 h with chemoradiotherapy. The three patients treated at 200 mg/12 h presented a dose-limiting toxicity: one patient had a grade 3 face edema, and two patients had a grade 3 rash and grade 3 hepatic cytolysis (66%). Of the 18 enrolled patients, 15 received the MTD of ralimetinib. At the MTD, the grade ≥ 3 adverse events during concomitant chemoradiotherapy were hepatic cytolysis (2/15 patients), dermatitis/rash (1/15), lymphopenia (1/15) and nausea/vomiting (1/15). No interaction of TMZ and ralimetinib when administrated concomitantly has been observed. Inhibition of pMAPKAP-K2 (−54%) was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Conclusion:This phase 1 trial is the first trial to study the combination of a p38-MAPK inhibitor, ralimetinib, with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (TMZ), in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients. The MTD of ralimetinib was 100 mg/12 h. The most frequent dose-limiting toxicities were hepatic cytolysis and rash.

Liver kinase B1 (LKB1/STK11) is the second tumor suppressor gene most frequently mutated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its activity is impaired in about half KRAS-mutated NSCLCs. Nowadays, no effective therapies are available for patients having these mutations. To highlight new vulnerabilities of this subgroup of tumors exploitable to design specific therapies we screened an US FDA-approved drug library using an isogenic system of wild-type (WT) or deleted LKB1. Among eight hit compounds, Birinapant, an inhibitor of the Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs), was the most active compound in LKB1-deleted clone only compared to its LKB1 WT counterpart. We validated the Birinapant cells response and its mechanism of action to be dependent on LKB1 deletion. Indeed, we demonstrated the ability of this compound to induce apoptosis, through activation of caspases in the LKB1-deleted clone only. Expanding our results, we found that the presence of KRAS mutations could mediate Birinapant resistance in a panel of NSCLC cell lines. The combination of Birinapant with Ralimetinib, inhibitor of p38α, restores the sensitivity of LKB1- and KRAS-mutated cell lines to the IAP inhibitor Birinapant. Our study shows how the use of Birinapant could be a viable therapeutic option for patients with LKB1-mutated NSCLCs. In addition, combination of Birinapant and a KRAS pathway inhibitor, as Ralimetinib, could be useful for patients with LKB1 and KRAS-mutated NSCLC.

Objective This phase 1b/2 clinical trial (NCT01663857) evaluated the efficacy of ralimetinib in combination with gemcitabine (G) and carboplatin (C), followed by maintenance ralimetinib, for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods Phase 1b was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ralimetinib administered Q12H on Days 1–10 (q21d) in combination with G (1000 mg/m2, Days 3 and 10) and C (AUC 4, Day 3) for six cycles. In phase 2, patients were randomized double-blind 1:1 to ralimetinib (R)+GC or placebo (P)+GC, for six cycles, followed by ralimetinib 300 mg Q12H or placebo on Days 1–14, q28d. Results 118 patients received at least one dose of ralimetinib or placebo; eight in phase 1b and 110 in phase 2 (R+GC, N = 58; P+GC, N = 52). The RP2D for R+GC was 200 mg Q12H. The study met its primary objective of a statistically significant difference in PFS (median: R+GC, 10.3 mo vs. P+GC, 7.9 mo; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.773, P = 0.2464, against a two-sided false positive rate of 0.4). Secondary objectives were not statistically significant for median overall survival (R+GC, 29.2 mo vs. P+GC, 25.1 mo; HR = 0.827, P = 0.4686) or overall response rate (R+GC 46.6% vs. P+GC, 46.2%; P = 0.9667). The safety profile of R+GC therapy was mainly consistent with safety of the chemotherapy backbone alone. Grade 3/4 elevated alanine aminotransferase was more common in the ralimetinib arm. Conclusions Addition of ralimetinib to GC resulted in a modest improvement in PFS.

Purpose: p38 MAPK regulates the production of cytokines in the tumor microenvironment and enables cancer cells to survive despite oncogenic stress, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies. Ralimetinib (LY2228820 dimesylate) is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of p38 MAPK. This phase I study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ralimetinib, as a single agent and in combination with tamoxifen, when administered orally to patients with advanced cancer. Experimental Design: The study design consisted of a dose-escalation phase performed in a 3+3 design (Part A; n = 54), two dose-confirmation phases [Part B at 420 mg (n = 18) and Part C at 300 mg (n = 8)], and a tumor-specific expansion phase in combination with tamoxifen for women with hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer refractory to aromatase inhibitors (Part D; n = 9). Ralimetinib was administered orally every 12 hours on days 1 to 14 of a 28-day cycle. Results: Eighty-nine patients received ralimetinib at 11 dose levels (10, 20, 40, 65, 90, 120, 160, 200, 300, 420, and 560 mg). Plasma exposure of ralimetinib (Cmax and AUC) increased in a dose-dependent manner. After a single dose, ralimetinib inhibited p38 MAPK–induced phosphorylation of MAPKAP-K2 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The most common adverse events, possibly drug-related, included rash, fatigue, nausea, constipation, pruritus, and vomiting. The recommended phase II dose was 300 mg every 12 hours as monotherapy or in combination with tamoxifen. Although no patients achieved a complete response or partial response,19 patients (21.3%) achieved stable disease with a median duration of 3.7 months, with 9 of these patients on study for ≥6 cycles. Conclusions: Ralimetinib demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics for patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(5); 1095–102. ©2015 AACR.

5537 Background: p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) regulates cytokine production in the tumor microenvironment and enables therapeutic resistance of cancer cells. Ralimetinib (R) is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of p38α and p38β MAPKs. Methods: Main inclusion criteria: ≥18 y; recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal, cancer after first-line treatment. Phase (Ph)1b was to determine the recommended Ph2 dose (RP2D) of R administered 12-hourly (Q12H) on Days 1-10 (21-day cycle [Q21D]) in combination with gemcitabine (G: 1000 mg/m2 on Days 3 and 10) and carboplatin (C: AUC 4 on Day 3) for 6 cycles. In Ph2, patients (pts) were randomized double-blind, 1:1 to RP2D R+GC or placebo (P)+GC, for 6 cycles, followed by R 300 mg Q12H or P on Days 1-14, Q28D until disease progression. The stratified log-rank test compared progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) between treatment groups in Ph2, at a 1-sided α level of 0.2. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01663857. Results: 118 pts received ≥1 dose of R or P (safety population); 8 in Ph1b and 110 in Ph2 (R+GC N = 58; P+GC N = 52). The RP2D for R in combination with GC was 200 mg Q12H. The study met its primary objective (median PFS: R+GC 10.3 mo vs P+GC 7.9 mo; HR = 0.773, 2-sided p = 0.246). The secondary objectives of median overall survival (R+GC 29.2 mo vs P+GC 25.1 mo; HR = 0.827, p = 0.469) or overall response rate (R+GC 46.6% vs P+GC 46.2%; p = 0.967) were not statistically significant, and 32.4% vs 25.0% of pts had normalized CA125 at the end of cycle 6. Most pts (safety population) experienced ≥1 Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE: R+GC 63/66 [95.5%]; P+GC 48/52 [92.3%]). Decreased neutrophil count (60.6% vs 76.9%), platelet count (43.9% vs 38.5%), and white blood cell count, (30.3% vs 26.9%), anemia (22.7% vs 25.0%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (19.7% vs 3.8%) were the Grade 3/4 TEAEs in ≥10% of pts in the R+GC and P+GC arms, respectively. Conclusions: Addition of ralimetinib to GC resulted in modest improvements in PFS. Grade 3/4 elevated ALT was more common in the ralimetinib arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01663857.