Search

Importance: Most research to understand postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or long COVID, has focused on adults, with less known about this complex condition in children. Research is needed to characterize pediatric PASC to enable studies of underlying mechanisms that will guide future treatment., Objective: To identify the most common prolonged symptoms experienced by children (aged 6 to 17 years) after SARS-CoV-2 infection, how these symptoms differ by age (school-age [6-11 years] vs adolescents [12-17 years]), how they cluster into distinct phenotypes, and what symptoms in combination could be used as an empirically derived index to assist researchers to study the likely presence of PASC., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter longitudinal observational cohort study with participants recruited from more than 60 US health care and community settings between March 2022 and December 2023, including school-age children and adolescents with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection history., Exposure: SARS-CoV-2 infection., Main Outcomes and Measures: PASC and 89 prolonged symptoms across 9 symptom domains., Results: A total of 898 school-age children (751 with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [referred to as infected] and 147 without [referred to as uninfected]; mean age, 8.6 years; 49% female; 11% were Black or African American, 34% were Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish, and 60% were White) and 4469 adolescents (3109 infected and 1360 uninfected; mean age, 14.8 years; 48% female; 13% were Black or African American, 21% were Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish, and 73% were White) were included. Median time between first infection and symptom survey was 506 days for school-age children and 556 days for adolescents. In models adjusted for sex and race and ethnicity, 14 symptoms in both school-age children and adolescents were more common in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection history compared with those without infection history, with 4 additional symptoms in school-age children only and 3 in adolescents only. These symptoms affected almost every organ system. Combinations of symptoms most associated with infection history were identified to form a PASC research index for each age group; these indices correlated with poorer overall health and quality of life. The index emphasizes neurocognitive, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms in school-age children but change or loss in smell or taste, pain, and fatigue/malaise-related symptoms in adolescents. Clustering analyses identified 4 PASC symptom phenotypes in school-age children and 3 in adolescents., Conclusions and Relevance: This study developed research indices for characterizing PASC in children and adolescents. Symptom patterns were similar but distinguishable between the 2 groups, highlighting the importance of characterizing PASC separately for these age ranges.

Importance: The prevalence, pathophysiology, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 (post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 [PASC] or "Long COVID") in children and young adults remain unknown. Studies must address the urgent need to define PASC, its mechanisms, and potential treatment targets in children and young adults., Observations: We describe the protocol for the Pediatric Observational Cohort Study of the NIH's REsearching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative. RECOVER-Pediatrics is an observational meta-cohort study of caregiver-child pairs (birth through 17 years) and young adults (18 through 25 years), recruited from more than 100 sites across the US. This report focuses on two of four cohorts that comprise RECOVER-Pediatrics: 1) a de novo RECOVER prospective cohort of children and young adults with and without previous or current infection; and 2) an extant cohort derived from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (n = 10,000). The de novo cohort incorporates three tiers of data collection: 1) remote baseline assessments (Tier 1, n = 6000); 2) longitudinal follow-up for up to 4 years (Tier 2, n = 6000); and 3) a subset of participants, primarily the most severely affected by PASC, who will undergo deep phenotyping to explore PASC pathophysiology (Tier 3, n = 600). Youth enrolled in the ABCD study participate in Tier 1. The pediatric protocol was developed as a collaborative partnership of investigators, patients, researchers, clinicians, community partners, and federal partners, intentionally promoting inclusivity and diversity. The protocol is adaptive to facilitate responses to emerging science., Conclusions and Relevance: RECOVER-Pediatrics seeks to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term effects of PASC from birth through 25 years old. RECOVER-Pediatrics is designed to elucidate the epidemiology, four-year clinical course, and sociodemographic correlates of pediatric PASC. The data and biosamples will allow examination of mechanistic hypotheses and biomarkers, thus providing insights into potential therapeutic interventions., Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05172011., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Brett Anderson reported receiving direct support for work not related to RECOVER work/publications from Genentech and the National Institute of Allergy and Immunology. Walter Dehority reported receiving grant support from Merck and participating in research for the Moderna COVID-19 pediatric vaccine trial and the Pfizer Paxlovid trial. Alex Fiks reported receiving support from NJM insurance and personal consulting fees not related to this paper from Rutgers University and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Ashraf Harahsheh reported serving as a scientific advisory board member unrelated to this paper for OP2 DRUGS. Lawrence Kleinman reported serving as an unpaid member of the Board of Directors for the DARTNet Institute, as a principle investigator at Quality Matters, Inc., and as the Vice Chair for the Borough of Metuchen Board of Health. Dr. Kleinman also reported grant support for work not related to RECOVER work/publications from NIH, HRSA, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Dr. Kleinman also reported minority individual stock ownership in Apple Computer, Sanofi SA, Experion, GlaxoSmithKline, Magyar Bank, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, JP Morgan Chase, and Amgen Inc. Torri Metz reported participating as a Principle Investigator in the medical advisory board for the planning of a Pfizer clinical trial of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy. She is also a principle investigator for a Pfizer study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of Paxlovid in pregnant people with COVID-19. Joshua Milner reported serving as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Blueprint Medicines, in a capacity unrelated to RECOVER work/publications. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Gross et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Importance: SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in ongoing, relapsing, or new symptoms or other health effects after the acute phase of infection; termed post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or long COVID. The characteristics, prevalence, trajectory and mechanisms of PASC are ill-defined. The objectives of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Multi-site Observational Study of PASC in Adults (RECOVER-Adult) are to: (1) characterize PASC prevalence; (2) characterize the symptoms, organ dysfunction, natural history, and distinct phenotypes of PASC; (3) identify demographic, social and clinical risk factors for PASC onset and recovery; and (4) define the biological mechanisms underlying PASC pathogenesis., Methods: RECOVER-Adult is a combined prospective/retrospective cohort currently planned to enroll 14,880 adults aged ≥18 years. Eligible participants either must meet WHO criteria for suspected, probable, or confirmed infection; or must have evidence of no prior infection. Recruitment occurs at 86 sites in 33 U.S. states, Washington, DC and Puerto Rico, via facility- and community-based outreach. Participants complete quarterly questionnaires about symptoms, social determinants, vaccination status, and interim SARS-CoV-2 infections. In addition, participants contribute biospecimens and undergo physical and laboratory examinations at approximately 0, 90 and 180 days from infection or negative test date, and yearly thereafter. Some participants undergo additional testing based on specific criteria or random sampling. Patient representatives provide input on all study processes. The primary study outcome is onset of PASC, measured by signs and symptoms. A paradigm for identifying PASC cases will be defined and updated using supervised and unsupervised learning approaches with cross-validation. Logistic regression and proportional hazards regression will be conducted to investigate associations between risk factors, onset, and resolution of PASC symptoms., Discussion: RECOVER-Adult is the first national, prospective, longitudinal cohort of PASC among US adults. Results of this study are intended to inform public health, spur clinical trials, and expand treatment options., Registration: NCT05172024., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Helen Chu reported consulting for Merck, GSK, Pfizer, Ellume, Janssen, Vindico CME, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and receiving research support from Gates Ventures, Ellume, and Sanofi Pasteur. She also serves as a co-investigator on studies funded by Pfizer, Novavax, and GSK. Maged Costantine reported receiving grant support for work not related to RECOVER work/publications from Baxter International and Siemens Healthcare and personal consulting fees not related to this paper from Progenity, Quidel Ortho, and Siemens Healthcare. Kristine Erlandson reported research funding from Gilead Sciences and consulting payments from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV Pharmaceuticals, all paid to the University of Colorado. Emily Gallagher reported consulting for Novartis, Flare Therapeutics and Seagen. Edward Gardner reported research support (clinical trials) from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Cepheid. Jason Goldman reported research support from Gilead, Eli Lilly and Regeneron; grants from Gilead, Merck (BARDA); personal fees for consulting from Gilead, Eli Lilly; and non-financial support from Adaptive Biotechnologies and Labcorp/Monogram Biosciences outside the submitted work. Timothy Heinrich reported grant support from Merck Inc. and consulting fees from Roche. Rachel Hess reported serving as Data Safety Monitoring Board member for Astellas Pharmaceuticals unrelated to the current work. Leora Horwitz reported being a member of the National Academy of Medicine Committee on the Long-Term Health Effects Stemming from COVID-19 and Implications for the Social Security Administration. Priscilla Hsue reported receiving honoraria from Gilead and Merck unrelated to study topic, receiving study drug from Regeneron unrelated to study topic, and receiving a research grant from Novartis. Judith James reported OMRF has licensed her IP to Progentec Biosciences, has received grant support from Progentec Biosciences, and serves on Advisory Committees to Glaxo Smith Klein, Merck and Novartis. Arthur Kim reports providing educational materials to Clinical Care Options and UpToDate and serving on a Data Safety Monitoring board for Kintor Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. Bruce Levy reported serving as a consultant for AstraZeneca, Entrinsic Biosciences, Gossamer Bio and Nocion Therapeutics and receiving research support from Amgen, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, SRA and Sanofi unrelated to the current work. Vincent Marconi reported receiving grants from NIH during the conduct of the study and grants from NIH, Veteran Affairs, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; grants, personal fees, nonfinancial support, and other from Lilly and Gilead; grants and personal fees from ViiV; and nonfinancial support from Bayer outside the submitted work. Grace McComsey reported serving as consultant for Merck, Gilead, ViiV, Janssen and have received research support from Pfizer, Vanda, Genentech, Roche, Redhill and Cognivue. Torri Metz reported being a site PI and a participant in the medical advisory board for the planning of a Pfizer clinical trial of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy. She also reported being a site PI for a Pfizer study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of Paxlovid in pregnant people with COVID-19. Janet Mullington reported support for investigator-initiated research by "Open Medicine Foundation and the Patient-Led Research Collaborative" Princess Ogbogu reported research support from Astrazeneca, GSK, Blueprint medical; advisory board for Astrazeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Kalvista; and consulting for Astrazeneca, GSK Sairam Parthasarathy reported research funding to Institution from Sergey Brin foundation of COVID and Long-COVID research. Michael Peluso reported consulting fees from Gilead Sciences and AstraZeneca, and service on data safety monitoring board for American Gene Technologies. Sean Quigley reported service on speaker Board for Servier, Alnylam, Agios; service on advisory board for Recordati, Alexion. Franz Rischard reported research support from NIH/NHLBI, United Therapeutics, Acceleron/Merck, Janssen, Insmed, Aerovate, and Bayer; and consulting/advisory compensation from Acceleron and Bayer. Nadine Rouphael reported being a consultant for ICON and EMMES as a safety consultant for clinical trials; service on the advisory boards for Moderna; funds to institution from Sanofi, Lilly, Merck, Quidel and Pfizer. PJ Utz reported stock ownership of Gilead and PI of biomarker studies for Pfizer STOP-PASC paxlovid trial Juan Wisnivesky received receiving consulting honorarium from Sanofi, Banook, Prospero, PPD and Atea and research grants from Sanofi, Regeneron, Axella, and Arnold Consultants., (Copyright: © 2023 Horwitz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The National Institutes of Health's Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program aims to study high-priority and high-impact pediatric conditions. This broad-based health initiative is unique in the National Institutes of Health research portfolio and involves 2 research components: (1) a large group of established centers with pediatric cohorts combining data to support longitudinal studies (ECHO cohorts) and (2) pediatric trials program for institutions within Institutional Development Awards states, known as the ECHO Institutional Development Awards States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network (ISPCTN). In the current presentation, we provide a broad overview of the ISPCTN and, particularly, its importance in enhancing clinical trials capabilities of pediatrician scientists through the support of research infrastructure, while at the same time implementing clinical trials that inform future health care for children. The ISPCTN research mission is aligned with the health priority conditions emphasized in the ECHO program, with a commitment to bringing state-of-the-science trials to children residing in underserved and rural communities. ISPCTN site infrastructure is critical to successful trial implementation and includes research training for pediatric faculty and coordinators. Network sites exist in settings that have historically had limited National Institutes of Health funding success and lacked pediatric research infrastructure, with the initial funding directed to considerable efforts in professional development, implementation of regulatory procedures, and engagement of communities and families. The Network has made considerable headway with these objectives, opening two large research studies during its initial 18 months as well as producing findings that serve as markers of success that will optimize sustainability., Competing Interests: POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Background: Morbidity from asthma is disproportionately higher among black patients than among white patients, and black patients constitute the minority of participants in trials informing treatment. Data indicate that patients with inadequately controlled asthma benefit more from addition of a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) than from increased glucocorticoids; however, these data may not be informative for treatment in black patients., Methods: We conducted two prospective, randomized, double-blind trials: one involving children and the other involving adolescents and adults. In both trials, the patients had at least one grandparent who identified as black and had asthma that was inadequately controlled with low-dose inhaled glucocorticoids. We compared combinations of therapy, which included the addition of a LABA (salmeterol) to an inhaled glucocorticoid (fluticasone propionate), a step-up to double to quintuple the dose of fluticasone, or both. The treatments were compared with the use of a composite measure that evaluated asthma exacerbations, asthma-control days, and lung function; data were stratified according to genotypic African ancestry., Results: When quintupling the dose of fluticasone (to 250 μg twice a day) was compared with adding salmeterol (50 μg twice a day) and doubling the fluticasone (to 100 μg twice a day), a superior response occurred in 46% of the children with quintupling the fluticasone and in 46% of the children with doubling the fluticasone and adding salmeterol (P = 0.99). In contrast, more adolescents and adults had a superior response to added salmeterol than to an increase in fluticasone (salmeterol-low-dose fluticasone vs. medium-dose fluticasone, 49% vs. 28% [P = 0.003]; salmeterol-medium-dose fluticasone vs. high-dose fluticasone, 49% vs. 31% [P = 0.02]). Neither the degree of African ancestry nor baseline biomarkers predicted a superior response to specific treatments. The increased dose of inhaled glucocorticoids was associated with a decrease in the ratio of urinary cortisol to creatinine in children younger than 8 years of age., Conclusions: In contrast to black adolescents and adults, almost half the black children with poorly controlled asthma had a superior response to an increase in the dose of an inhaled glucocorticoid and almost half had a superior response to the addition of a LABA. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; BARD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01967173.)., (Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

A growing body of literature has investigated optimizing asthma management by identifying phenotypes and biomarkers to guide the treatment. In particular, management of asthma in preschool children remains challenging due to different phenotype presentation in early life. The focus of this review is to summarize the recent data on personalized medicine in management of preschool children with wheezing., Competing Interests: Dr. Raissy is the principal investigator for AsthmaNet, NHLBI-funded network at the University of New Mexico. No other competing financial interests exist.

Patients with cystic fibrosis are experimenting with inhaling essential oils (scientifically described as random plant-derived secondary metabolites) through diffusers or nebulizers as a form of natural therapy to treat chronic lung infections. In vitro studies are starting to be published on the effects of essential oils (cinnamon, clove, oregano, and thyme) on bacteria commonly found in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis. There are no clinical studies and therefore no data are available on a potential placebo effect. There is a potential risk of lipoid pneumonia with inhaling essential oils, although no case reports have been published. There is also potential for pesticide exposure, particularly with peppermint oil. Treating providers are encouraged to include discussion of the use of herbal and other natural remedies with their patients and patient caregivers.

Purpose: Voluntary consent/assent with adolescents invited to participate in research raises challenging problems. No studies to date have attempted to manipulate autonomy in relation to assent/consent processes. This study evaluated the effects of an autonomy-enhanced individualized assent/consent procedure embedded within a randomized pediatric asthma clinical trial., Methods: Families were randomly assigned to remain together or separated during a consent/assent process; the latter we characterize as an autonomy-enhanced assent/consent procedure. We hypothesized that separating adolescents from their parents would improve adolescent assent by increasing knowledge and appreciation of the clinical trial and willingness to participate., Results: Sixty-four adolescent-parent dyads completed procedures. The together versus separate randomization made no difference in adolescent or parent willingness to participate. However, significant differences were found in both parent and adolescent knowledge of the asthma clinical trial based on the assent/consent procedure and adolescent age. The separate assent/consent procedure improved knowledge of study risks and benefits for older adolescents and their parents but not for the younger youth or their parents. Regardless of the assent/consent process, younger adolescents had lower comprehension of information associated with the study medication and research risks and benefits, but not study procedures or their research rights and privileges., Conclusions: The use of an autonomy-enhanced assent/consent procedure for adolescents may improve their and their parent's informed assent/consent without impacting research participation decisions. Traditional assent/consent procedures may result in a "diffusion of responsibility" effect between parents and older adolescents, specifically in attending to key information associated with study risks and benefits.

The safety of cough and cold products for pediatric use has been a concern of regulatory agencies and advocacy groups for decades. Most recently, the Food and Drug Administration requested input from Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committees on the safety of codeine for cough in children aged 18 years and younger. There is little evidence of efficacy for codeine in the treatment of acute cough in children, but mounting evidence for risks of respiratory depression and death. Similarly, dextromethorphan, benzonatate, antihistamines, guaifenesin, and mucolytics lack efficacy in controlled trials or there are no data with which to evaluate efficacy, and dextromethorphan may cause respiratory depression. Honey and topical use of aromatic oils (camphor, menthol, and eucalyptus) have limited evidence of efficacy, but may have the greatest margin of safety for treatment of acute cough in children.

Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) elected not to approve a once-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist combination product in 12-17-year-old patients due to lack of sufficient data, despite approval of previous combination products with similar levels of supporting evidence. As the FDA's stance toward adolescent data is changing, the opportunity to learn about their response to asthma medication has now arisen. A review of the relevant issues pertinent to pharmacotherapy of asthma in the 12-17-year-old population is discussed in this review.

Background: Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for children with mild persistent asthma; however, specific patient characteristics may modify the treatment response., Objective: Identify demographic, clinical, and atopic characteristics that may modify the inhaled corticosteroid treatment response among children enrolled in the Treating Children to Prevent Exacerbations of Asthma trial., Methods: Children aged 6 to 18 years with mild persistent asthma were randomized to 44 weeks of combined, daily, rescue, or placebo treatment. Daily treatment consisted of 40 μg of beclomethasone twice daily. Rescue treatment consisted of 40 μg of beclomethasone accompanying each symptom-driven albuterol actuation. Combined treatment consisted of both. Outcomes included time to first exacerbation and proportion of asthma control days. Fourteen baseline characteristics were selected for interaction testing on the basis of their clinical relevance., Results: Two hundred eighty-eight children were randomized. Seventy-five percent were white, and 55% were male. As measured by time to first exacerbation, 4 characteristics identified children who received greater benefit from treatment: non-Hispanic ethnicity, positive aeroallergen skin test result, serum immunoglobulin E level of 350 K/μL or more, and history of oral corticosteroid use in the year before enrollment. As measured by asthma control days, 4 characteristics identified children who received greater benefit from treatment: male sex, positive aeroallergen skin test result, serum immunoglobulin E level of 350 K/μL or more, and incomplete run-in asthma control., Conclusions: Children with mild persistent asthma who have markers of atopic asthma or who have greater asthma burden may obtain greater benefit from beclomethasone therapy. Additional study is needed to confirm whether these markers can guide individualized therapy., (Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Many observational studies have investigated the potential association between vitamin D and asthma. However, it is difficult to find a temporal causal relationship in cross-sectional or observational studies. This review presents recent clinical trials and the evidence of association between vitamin D and asthma in different patient populations and asthma status. Well-designed clinical trials are warranted in order to define the optimal level of vitamin D, as well as dosing and duration of vitamin D supplementation, in pediatric patients.

A new product, Epinephrine HFA, is being considered by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for marketing approval as a nonprescription bronchodilator inhaler for the treatment of the "temporary relief of mild symptoms of intermittent asthma in adults and children 12 years of age and older." This product would serve as a replacement for Primatene ® Mist, which was removed from the market in December 2011 in accordance with the requirements of the Montreal Protocol to phase out chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants. The Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee and the Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee met in early 2014 to review the clinical data. The data indicate that Epinephrine HFA provides improvement in lung function at the proposed doses and that no clinically important safety issues were observed. There were, however, concerns that the device could malfunction and that the dose-counter could lose accuracy. These device issues are significant for a drug that could be used for life-threatening symptoms of asthma. All study data presented are publically available from the FDA website at www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/NonprescriptionDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/ucm380890.htm for the February 24, 2014, meeting.

Enantiomers are one of several possible molecular configurations present in a drug that has at least 1 chiral center. A drug containing 2 or more enatiomers is called a racemic mixture. Enatiomers are being developed from racemic mixtures as drugs in their own right often to extend patent protection of highly popular drugs. However, the therapeutic advantages of single enantiomer drugs developed for respiratory use such as levalbuterol, arformoterol, and levocetirizine over their racemate has been disappointing. In addition, single enantiomer drugs may be several fold more expensive than the racemic drug. New single enantiomer drugs, which are stable (no interconversion back to the racemate) and have fewer adverse effects and a more predictable pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic profile would confer a therapeutic advantage and thus would be beneficial for clinical use.

Asthma is difficult to diagnose in the child with sickle cell disease because symptoms and pulmonary function abnormalities are similar to the spectrum of pulmonary manifestations in sickle cell disease. There are no published reports of controlled trials of asthma medications in children with sickle cell disease. Thus, treatment decisions should be guided by the Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma (www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf). However, issues specific to children with sickle cell disease should be considered. Initial strategies should focus on control of environmental triggers, as effectiveness on asthma outcomes is proven and the cost for implementation can be low. Use of short- and long-acting β 2 -agonists may prolong QTc, particularly in this population of children who already have a higher prevalence of prolonged QTc than the general population. Long-acting β 2 -agonist use has been associated with life-threatening asthma exacerbations with potentially higher risks in African Americans. Montelukast has been reported to increase suicidal thinking and behavior, and persons with asthma and sickle cell disease are already at risk for these events. Oral corticosteroids in the treatment of acute chest syndrome may increase risk of readmission even in children with asthma. The lack of prospective controlled trials of asthma drug treatment in children with asthma and sickle cell disease compels us to move this issue forward.

Background: Daily inhaled corticosteroids are an effective treatment for mild persistent asthma, but some children have exacerbations even with good day-to-day control, and many discontinue treatment after becoming asymptomatic. We assessed the effectiveness of an inhaled corticosteroid (beclomethasone dipropionate) used as rescue treatment., Methods: In this 44-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial we enrolled children and adolescents with mild persistent asthma aged 5-18 years from five clinical centres in the USA. A computer-generated randomisation sequence, stratified by clinical centre and age group, was used to randomly assign participants to one of four treatment groups: twice daily beclomethasone with beclomethasone plus albuterol as rescue (combined group); twice daily beclomethasone with placebo plus albuterol as rescue (daily beclomethasone group); twice daily placebo with beclomethasone plus albuterol as rescue (rescue beclomethasone group); and twice daily placebo with placebo plus albuterol as rescue (placebo group). Twice daily beclomethasone treatment was one puff of beclomethasone (40 μg per puff) or placebo given in the morning and evening. Rescue beclomethasone treatment was two puffs of beclomethasone or placebo for each two puffs of albuterol (180 μg) needed for symptom relief. The primary outcome was time to first exacerbation that required oral corticosteroids. A secondary outcome measured linear growth. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00394329., Results: 843 children and adolescents were enrolled into this trial, of whom 288 were assigned to one of four treatment groups; combined (n=71), daily beclomethasone (n=72), rescue beclomethasone (n=71), and placebo (n=74)-555 individuals were excluded during the run-in, according to predefined criteria. Compared with the placebo group (49%, 95% CI 37-61), the frequency of exacerbations was lower in the daily (28%, 18-40, p=0·03), combined (31%, 21-43, p=0·07), and rescue (35%, 24-47, p=0·07) groups. Frequency of treatment failure was 23% (95% CI 14-43) in the placebo group, compared with 5·6% (1·6-14) in the combined (p=0·012), 2·8% (0-10) in the daily (p=0·009), and 8·5% (2-15) in the rescue (p=0·024) groups. Compared with the placebo group, linear growth was 1·1 cm (SD 0·3) less in the combined and daily arms (p<0·0001), but not the rescue group (p=0·26). Only two individuals had severe adverse events; one in the daily beclomethasone group had viral meningitis and one in the combined group had bronchitis., Interpretation: Children with mild persistent asthma should not be treated with rescue albuterol alone and the most effective treatment to prevent exacerbations is daily inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids as rescue medication with albuterol might be an effective step-down strategy for children with well controlled, mild asthma because it is more effective at reducing exacerbations than is use of rescue albuterol alone. Use of daily inhaled corticosteroid treatment and related side-effects such as growth impairment can therefore be avoided., Funding: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most effective long-term controllers for the treatment of childhood asthma. There is now substantial controlled clinical trial data to support the efficacy and safety of ICS therapy in infants and young children (6 months to 4 years of age). These data support the use of nebulizer suspension or metered-dose inhalers with valved holding chambers as effective forms of delivery in this age group. Currently, selection of delivery method depends on the comfort of the parent and the cooperation of the child, as well as on which drug the clinician chooses. The ICSs have a favorable safety profile when administered in currently recommended dosages. A transient 0.5- to 2-cm growth delay occurs in prepubescent children but does not appear to affect attainment of predicted adult height. Long-term trials support the existing recommendations of lowering dosage once control is achieved and stopping therapy when the child's asthma is in remission.