Axel Le Cesne, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Olivier Mir, Jean-Yves Blay, Nicolas Penel, Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger, Karl Kashofer, Rainer Hamacher, Emilie Decoupigny, Jennifer Wallet, Thomas Brodowicz, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Graz, Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] (UNICANCER/Lille), Université Lille Nord de France (COMUE)-UNICANCER, Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), Département interdisciplinaire d’organisation des parcours patients (DIOPP), Département de médecine oncologique [Gustave Roussy], West German Cancer Center [Essen, Germany], Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), National Institutes of Health, NIH Bayer HealthCare, BHC Bayer HealthCare, BHC, Funding: This study was fully funded by Bayer HealthCare, S.A.S. The study design was set up by the study coordinators (NP and TB), the sponsor, and their statisticians. Bayer HealthCare S.A.S. had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data. The corresponding authors had full access to all of the data, and the final responsibility to submit for publication. This study was not funded by NIH., Conflicts of Interest: N.P., T.B., and J.Y.B. received research funding from Bayer HealthCare SA. T.B. reports personal fees from Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, PharmaMar, and Eisai outside the submitted work. A.L.C. declares personal fees from Novatis, PharmaMar, Pfizer, Lilly and Ariad, outside the submitted work. O.M. reports personal fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, and BMS, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., Medizinische Universität Wien = Medical University of Vienna, Université de Lille-UNICANCER, Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon], Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon, and Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Saclay
Regorafenib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in pretreated patients with advanced non-adipocytic sarcoma (HR = 0.46, p <, 0.001) in a placebo-controlled, randomized, phase-II trial (NCT01900743). Thus, here, we assessed the prevalence of 57 biomarkers and their prognostic and predictive values for PFS and overall survival (OS). We analyzed 134/182 patients included in this trial, treated with regorafenib (n = 71, 53%) or placebo (n = 63, 47%). Mutational analyses were performed via full coding sequence analysis for 10 genes, and mutation hotspot panel for 50 genes (four genes in common). H19 was studied with RNA in-situ hybridization. The prognostic and predictive biomarkers&rsquo, values were studied only for biomarkers found positive/mutated in at least 10 patients. Overall, 25 out of 57 studied biomarkers, including five out of seven genes involved in angiogenesis, were found mutated/positive in at least one patient, of which 23 biomarkers had low prevalence (fewer than eight out of 134 patients), contrasting with H19 (n = 24, 18%), and TP53 (n = 35, 26%). However, in multivariable models of PFS and OS, including treatment effects and interactions, no significant prognostic or predictive values of the tested biomarkers were observed. Though several promising biomarkers were found to be positive/mutated, none of them were identified as viable predictive and prognostic biomarkers.