Search

What happens once a cortical territory becomes functionally redundant? We addressed brain and behavioural adaptations for the intact hand in individuals with a missing hand. Previous studies reported increased ipsilateral activity in the somatosensory territory of the missing hand (i.e., remapping) in acquired amputees, but not in individuals with a congenitally missing hand (one-handers). It is unclear whether remapping in amputees involves recruiting more neural resources to support the intact hand, and whether such activity is increased in tasks that demand greater motor control. We investigated sensorimotor learning and neural representation of the intact hand in one-handers and amputees using a multi-finger configuration task, as well as univariate and multivariate fMRI. We found that ipsilateral activity increased with motor demand - but only in the amputees group. However, these changes did not reflect behavioural differences. The representation of the finger configurations, as revealed by multivariate analysis, was stronger in amputees and closer to the typical representation found in controls’ contralateral hand territory, compared to one-handers. This collaborative contra-ipsilateral activity may reflect the intact hand’s efference copy. One-handers struggled to learn difficult finger configurations, but this did not translate to differences in univariate or multivariate activity relative to controls. Together with a supplementary structural white matter analysis, our results suggest that enhanced activity in the missing hand territory may not reflect intact hand function. Instead, we suggest that plasticity is more restricted than generally assumed and may depend on the availability of homologous pathways acquired early in life.Significant StatementWe studied whether brain resources in the missing-hand territory support demanding intact hand motor control in people who were born with one hand or lost a hand later in life. We found that amputees had increased activity in the brain area used for the missing hand, but no improvement in the performance of their intact hand. This collaborative contra-ipsilateral activity may reflect the intact hand’s efference copy. One-handers showed slight deficits while learning to perform complex motor movements, but no brain activity differences in the missing hand territory, compared to controls. Our results suggest that brain plasticity is limited and may depend on early life experiences.

Orientation information contributes substantially to our tactile perception, such as feeling an object's shape on the skin. For vision, a perceptual adaptation aftereffect (tilt aftereffect; TAE), which is well explained by neural orientation selectivity, has been used to reveal fundamental perceptual properties of orientation processing. Neural orientation selectivity has been reported in somatosensory cortices. However, little research has investigated the perceptual characteristics of the tactile TAE. The aim of the current study was to provide the first demonstration of a tactile TAE on the hand and investigate the perceptual nature of tactile TAE on the hand surface. We used a 2-point stimulation with minimal input for orientation. We found clear TAEs on the hand surface: Adaptation induced shifts in subjective vertical sensation toward the orientation opposite to the adapted orientation. Further, adaptation aftereffects were purely based on orientation processing given that the effects transferred between different lengths across adaptor and test stimuli and type of stimuli. Finally, adaptation aftereffects were anchored to the hand: tactile TAE occurred independently of hand rotation and transferred from palm to dorsum sides of the hand, while the effects did not transfer between hands. Our findings demonstrate the existence of hand-centered perceptual processing for basic tactile orientation information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

At the beginning of 2020, COVID-19 became a global problem. Despite all the efforts to emphasize the relevance of preventive measures, not everyone adhered to them. Thus, learning more about the characteristics determining attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic is crucial to improving future interventions. In this study, we applied machine learning on the multinational data collected by the International Collaboration on the Social and Moral Psychology of COVID-19 (N = 51,404) to test the predictive efficacy of constructs from social, moral, cognitive, and personality psychology, as well as socio-demographic factors, in the attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic. The results point to several valuable insights. Internalized moral identity provided the most consistent predictive contribution—individuals perceiving moral traits as central to their self-concept reported higher adherence to preventive measures. Similar results were found for morality as cooperation, symbolized moral identity, self-control, open-mindedness, and collective narcissism, while the inverse relationship was evident for the endorsement of conspiracy theories. However, we also found a non-neglible variability in the explained variance and predictive contributions with respect to macro-level factors such as the pandemic stage or cultural region. Overall, the results underscore the importance of morality-related and contextual factors in understanding adherence to public health recommendations during the pandemic., PNAS Nexus, 1 (3), ISSN:2752-6542

Today more than ever, we are asked to evaluate the realness, truthfulness and trustworthiness of our social world. Here, we focus on how people evaluate realistic-looking faces of non-existing people generated by generative adversarial networks (GANs). GANs are increasingly used in marketing, journalism, social media, and political propaganda. In three studies, we investigated if and how participants can distinguish between GAN and REAL faces and the social consequences of their exposure to artificial faces. GAN faces were more likely to be perceived as

While the study of affect and emotion has a long history in psychological sciences and neuroscience, the very question of how visceral states have come to the forefront of politics remains poorly understood. The concept ofvisceral politicscaptures how the physiological nature of our engagement with the social world influences how we make decisions, just as socio-political forces recruit our physiology to influence our socio-political behaviour. This line of research attempts to bridge the psychophysiological mechanisms that are responsible for our affective states with the historical socio-cultural context in which such states are experienced. We review findings and hypotheses at the intersections of life sciences, social sciences and humanities to shed light onhowandwhypeople come to experience such emotions in politics and what if any are their behavioural consequences. To answer these questions, we provide insights from predictive coding accounts of interoception and emotion and a proof of concept experiment to highlight the role of visceral states in political behaviour.This article is part of the theme issue ‘The political brain: neurocognitive and computational mechanisms’.

Photography and photojournalism frame our experience of the world, especially in a culture powered by images at an unprecedented level. Images in the digital age and the era of alternative facts mediate our relations to other human beings and make our negotiation between what is real or fake challenging. We investigated how our visceral responses, as the basis of subjective feelings, influence our relation and responses to the authenticity of photojournalistic images. Higher neurophysiological and affective arousal at the first perception of an image predicted the probability with which participants would judge that image as ‘real’ in a subsequent session. These findings highlight the crucial role that physiology plays in engaging us with imagery, beyond cognitive processing. ‘Feeling in seeing’ seems to be a salient signal that at least partly determines our beliefs in a culture powered by images. By considering at the same time the underlying neural, physiological and cognitive mechanisms that guide our responses to images as well as the contextual cultural effects on how these mechanisms are recruited, these findings contribute to long-standing but still timely and multidisciplinary debates in visual culture.

The possibility of being invisible has long fascinated people. Recent research showed that multisensory illusions can induce experiences of bodily invisibility, allowing the psychological consequences of invisibility to be explored. Here, we demonstrate an illusion of embodying an invisible face. Participants received touches on their face and simultaneously saw a paintbrush moving synchronously in empty space and defining the shape of an invisible face. Using both explicit questionnaire measures (Experiment 1) and implicit physiological measures (Experiment 2), we show that such invisible enfacement induces a sense of ownership. We further demonstrate that embodying an invisible face shrinks the width of the cone of gaze (i.e., the range of eye deviations people judge as directed toward themselves; Experiments 3 and 4). These results suggest that the experience of invisibility affects the way in which we process the attention of others toward the self, starting from the perception of gaze direction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Today more than ever, we are asked to judge the realness, truthfulness and trustworthiness of our social world. We here focus on how people perceive artificially-generated faces. Faces generated by Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are realistic-looking faces of non-existing people, increasingly used in marketing, journalism, social media, and political propaganda. Across three studies, we investigated if and how participants can distinguish between GAN and Real faces and the social consequences of exposure to artificial faces. GAN faces were more likely perceived as real than Real faces, a pattern partly explained by intrinsic stimuli characteristics. Moreover, participants’ realness judgments influenced their behaviour, displaying increased social conformity towards faces perceived as real, independently of their actual realness. Lastly, knowledge about the presence of GAN faces eroded social trust. Our findings point to potentially far-reaching consequences of the pervasive use of GAN faces in a culture powered by images at unprecedented levels.

Changing collective behaviour and supporting non-pharmaceutical interventions is an important component in mitigating virus transmission during a pandemic. In a large international collaboration (Study 1, N = 49,968 across 67 countries), we investigated self-reported factors that associated with people reported adopting public health behaviours (e.g., spatial distancing and stricter hygiene) and endorsed public policy interventions (e.g., closing bars and restaurants) during the early stage of the pandemic (April-May 2020). Respondents who reported identifying more strongly with their nation consistently reported greater engagement in public health behaviours and support for public health policies. Results were similar for representative and non-representative national samples. Study 2 (N = 42 countries) conceptually replicated the central finding using aggregate indices of national identity (obtained using the World Values Survey) and a measure of actual behaviour change during the pandemic (obtained from Google mobility reports). Higher levels of national identification prior to the pandemic predicted lower mobility during the early stage of the pandemic (r = -.40). We discuss the potential implications of links between national identity, leadership, and public health for managing COVID-19 and future pandemics.

When we observe other people's actions, a number of parietal and precentral regions known to be involved in the planning and execution of actions are recruited for example seen as power decreases in alpha and beta frequencies indicative of increased activation. It has been argued that this recruitment reflects the process of simulating the observed action, thereby providing access to the meaning of the action. Alternatively, it has been suggested that rather than providing access to the meaning of an action, parietal and precentral regions might be recruited as a consequence of action understanding. A way to distinguish between these alternatives is to examine where in the brain and at which time point it is possible to discriminate between different types of actions (e.g., pointing or grasping) irrespective of the way these are performed. To this aim, we presented participants with videos of simple hand actions performed with the left or right hand towards a target on the left or the right side while recording magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. In each trial, participants were presented with two subsequent videos (S1, S2) depicting either the same (repeat trials) or different (non-repeat trials) actions. We predicted that areas that are sensitive to the type of action should show stronger adaptation (i.e., a smaller decrease in alpha and beta power) in repeat in comparison to non-repeat trials. Indeed, we observed less alpha and beta power decreases during the presentation of S2 when the action was repeated compared to when two different actions were presented indicating adaptation of neuronal populations that are selective for the type of action. Sources were obtained exclusively in posterior occipitotemporal regions, supporting the notion that an early differentiation of actions occurs outside the motor system.

Recent studies have revealed significant cultural modulations on face scanning strategies, thereby challenging the notion of universality in face perception. Current findings are based on screen-based paradigms, which offer high degrees of experimental control, but lack critical characteristics common to social interactions (e.g., social presence, dynamic visual saliency), and complementary approaches are required. The current study used head-mounted eye tracking techniques to investigate the visual strategies for face scanning in British/Irish (in the UK) and Japanese adults (in Japan) who were engaged in dyadic social interactions with a local research assistant. We developed novel computational data pre-processing tools and data-driven analysis techniques based on Monte Carlo permutation testing. The results revealed significant cultural differences in face scanning during social interactions for the first time, with British/Irish participants showing increased mouth scanning and the Japanese group engaging in greater eye and central face looking. Both cultural groups further showed more face orienting during periods of listening relative to speaking, and during the introduction task compared to a storytelling game, thereby replicating previous studies testing Western populations. Altogether, these findings point to the significant role of postnatal social experience in specialised face perception and highlight the adaptive nature of the face processing system.

In the absence of input from the external world, humans are still able to generate vivid mental images. This cognitive process, known as visual mental imagery, involves a network of prefrontal, parietal, inferotemporal, and occipital regions. Using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), previous studies were able to distinguish between the different orientations of imagined gratings, but not between more complex imagined stimuli, such as common objects, in early visual cortex (V1). Here we asked whether letters, simple shapes, and objects can be decoded in early visual areas during visual mental imagery. In a delayed spatial judgment task, we asked participants to observe or imagine stimuli. To examine whether it is possible to discriminate between neural patterns during perception and visual mental imagery, we performed ROI-based and whole-brain searchlight-based MVPA. We were able to decode imagined stimuli in early visual (V1, V2), parietal (SPL, IPL, aIPS), inferotemporal (LOC) and prefrontal (PMd) areas. In a subset of these areas (i.e., V1, V2, LOC, SPL, IPL and aIPS), we also obtained significant cross-decoding across visual imagery and perception. Moreover, we observed a linear relationship between behavioral accuracy and the amplitude of the BOLD signal in parietal and inferotemporal cortices, but not in early visual cortex, in line with the view that these areas contribute to the ability to perform visual imagery. Together, our results suggest that in the absence of bottom-up visual inputs, patterns of functional activation in early visual cortex allow distinguishing between different imagined stimulus exemplars, most likely mediated by signals from parietal and inferotemporal areas.

Psychophysical experiments have demonstrated large and highly systematic perceptual distortions of tactile space. We investigated the neural basis of tactile space by analyzing activity patterns induced by tactile stimulation of nine points on a 3 × 3 square grid on the hand dorsum using functional magnetic resonance (fMRI). We used a searchlight approach within pre-defined regions of interests (ROIs) to compute the pairwise Euclidean distances between the activity patterns elicited by tactile stimulation. Then, we used multidimensional scaling (MDS) to reconstruct tactile space at the neural level and compare it with skin space at the perceptual level. Our reconstructions of the shape of skin space in contralateral primary somatosensory (SI) and motor (M1) cortices reveal that it is distorted in a way that matches the perceptual shape of skin space. This suggests that early sensorimotor areas are critical to processing tactile space perception.Significant StatementHere, we show that the primary somatosensory (SI) and motor (M1) cortices, rather than higher-level brain areas, are critical to estimating distances between tactile stimuli on the hand dorsum. By combining functional magnetic resonance (fMRI), Procrustes alignment, and multidimensional scaling, we reconstructed the shape of skin space in the brain. Strikingly, the shape of the skin that we reconstructed from neural data matches the distortions we found at the behavioral level, providing strong evidence that early sensorimotor areas are critical for the construction of tactile space. Our work therefore supports the view that tactile distance perception is computed at lower level in the somatosensory system than is usually supposed.

Recent studies have demonstrated that mental representations of the hand dorsum are distorted even for healthy participants. Perceptual hand maps estimated by pointing to specific landmarks (e.g., knuckles and tips of fingers) is stretched and shrunk along the medio-lateral and the proximo-distal axes, respectively. Similarly, tactile distance perception between two touches is longer along the medio-lateral axis than the proximo-distal axis. The congruency of the two types of distortions suggests that common perceptual and neural representations may be involved in these processes. Prolonged stimulation by two simultaneous touches having a particular distance can bias subsequent perception of tactile distances (e.g., adaptation to a long distance induces shorter stimuli to be perceived even shorter). This tactile distance adaptation aftereffect has been suggested to occur based on the modulations of perceptual and neural responses at low somatosensory processing stages. The current study investigated whether tactile distance adaptation aftereffects affect also the pattern of distortions on the perceptual hand maps. Participants localized locations on the hand dorsum cued by tactile stimulations (Experiment 1) or visually presented landmarks on a hand silhouette (Experiment 2). Each trial was preceded by adaptation to either a small (2 cm) or large (4 cm) tactile distance. We found clear tactile distance aftereffects. However, no changes were observed for the distorted pattern of the perceptual hand maps following adaptation to a tactile distance. Our results showed that internal body representations involved in perceptual distortions may be distinct between tactile distance perception and the perceptual hand maps underlying position sense.

Categories provide a fundamental source of information used to structure our perception of the world. For example, when people reproduce the remembered location of a dot in a circle, they implicitly impose vertical and horizontal axes onto the circle, and responses are biased towards the center of each of the resulting quadrants. Such results reveal the existence of spatial prototypes, which function as Bayesian priors and which are integrated with actual memory traces. Spatial prototypes have been extensively investigated and described in previous studies, but it remains unclear what type of information is used to create spatial categories. We developed a new approach that allowed to 'image' patterns of spatial bias in detail, and map the internal representational structure of objects and space. Previous studies, using circular shapes suggested that boundaries are established based on a viewer-based frame of reference, therefore using cues extrinsic to the object. Given that a circle has radial symmetry, the axes imposed cannot come from the shape itself. Here we investigated if the same applies for shapes with clearly-defined symmetry axes and thus intrinsic frames of reference. Using rotated shapes (squares and rectangles), where extrinsic and intrinsic cues are dissociated, we observed flexible usage of multiple reference frames. Furthermore, in certain contexts, participants relied mostly on cues intrinsic to the shape itself. These results show that humans divide visual space as a function of multiple reference frames, in a flexible, and context dependent manner.

Categorizing and understanding other people’s actions is a key human capability. Whereas there exists a growing literature regarding the organization of objects, the representational space underlying the organization of observed actions remains largely unexplored. Here we examined the organizing principles of a large set of actions and the corresponding neural representations. Using multiple regression representational similarity analysis of fMRI data, in which we accounted for variability due to major action components (body parts, scenes, movements, objects, sociality, transitivity) and three control models (distance between observer and actor, number of people, HMAX-C1), we found that the semantic dissimilarity structure was best captured by patterns of activation in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC). Together, our results demonstrate that the organization of observed actions in the LOTC resembles the organizing principles used by participants to classify actions behaviorally, in line with the view that this region is crucial for accessing the meaning of actions.

To be able to interact with our environment, we need to transform incoming sensory information into goal-directed motor outputs. Whereas our ability to plan an appropriate movement based on sensory information appears effortless and simple, the underlying brain dynamics are still largely unknown. Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate this issue by recording brain activity during the planning of non-visually guided reaching and grasping actions, performed with either the left or right hand. Adopting a combination of univariate and multivariate analyses, we revealed specific patterns of beta power modulations underlying varying levels of neural representations during movement planning. (1) Effector-specific modulations were evident as a decrease in power in the beta band. Within both hemispheres, this decrease was stronger while planning a movement with the contralateral hand. (2) The comparison of planned grasping and reaching led to a relative increase in power in the beta band. These power changes were localized within temporal, premotor and posterior parietal cortices. Action-related modulations overlapped with effector-related beta power changes within widespread frontal and parietal regions, suggesting the possible integration of these two types of neural representations. (3) Multivariate analyses of action-specific power changes revealed that part of this broadband beta modulation also contributed to the encoding of an effector-independent neural representation of a planned action within fronto-parietal and temporal regions. Our results suggest that beta band power modulations play a central role in movement planning, within both the dorsal and ventral stream, by coding and integrating different levels of neural representations, ranging from the simple representation of the to-be-moved effector up to an abstract, effector-independent representation of the upcoming action.

Understanding other people's actions is a fundamental prerequisite for social interactions. Whether action understanding relies on simulating the actions of others in the observers' motor system or on the access to conceptual knowledge stored in nonmotor areas is strongly debated. It has been argued previously that areas that play a crucial role in action understanding should (1) distinguish between different actions, (2) generalize across the ways in which actions are performed (Dinstein et al., 2008; Oosterhof et al., 2013; Caramazza et al., 2014), and (3) have access to action information around the time of action recognition (Hauk et al., 2008). Whereas previous studies focused on the first two criteria, little is known about the dynamics underlying action understanding. We examined which human brain regions are able to distinguish between pointing and grasping, regardless of reach direction (left or right) and effector (left or right hand), using multivariate pattern analysis of magnetoencephalography data. We show that the lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) has the earliest access to abstract action representations, which coincides with the time point from which there was enough information to allow discriminating between the two actions. By contrast, precentral regions, though recruited early, have access to such abstract representations substantially later. Our results demonstrate that in contrast to the LOTC, the early recruitment of precentral regions does not contain the detailed information that is required to recognize an action. We discuss previous theoretical claims of motor theories and how they are incompatible with our data.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTIt is debated whether our ability to understand other people's actions relies on the simulation of actions in the observers' motor system, or is based on access to conceptual knowledge stored in nonmotor areas. Here, using magnetoencephalography in combination with machine learning, we examined where in the brain and at which point in time it is possible to distinguish between pointing and grasping actions regardless of the way in which they are performed (effector, reach direction). We show that, in contrast to the predictions of motor theories of action understanding, the lateral occipitotemporal cortex has access to abstract action representations substantially earlier than precentral regions.