Search

We assessed the capability of an integrated multisensory patch-type monitor (RootiRx®) in detecting episodes of reflex (pre)syncope induced by tilt table test (TTT). Firstly, we performed an intrapatient comparison of cuffless systolic blood pressure (SBP), R–R interval (RRI) and variability (power spectrum analysis) obtained by means of the RootiRx® with those obtained with conventional methods (CONV) with validated finger pressure devices at baseline in supine position and repeatedly during TTT in 32 patients affected by likely reflex syncope. Secondly, the LF/HF values obtained with RootiRx® during TTT were analyzed in 50 syncope patients. Compared with baseline supine recordings, during TTT a decrement of median SBP was observed with CONV (−53.5 mmHg) but not with RootiRx® ®(−1 mmHg). Conversely, RRI reduction (CONV: 102 ms; RootiRx®: 127 ms) and RRI Low Frequency/High Frequency powers ratio (LF/HF) increase (CONV: 1.6; RootiRx®: 2.5) were similar. The concordance was good for RRI (0.97 [95% CI 0.96–0.98]) and fair for LF/HF ratio (0.69 [95% CI 0.46-0.83]). During the first 5 min of TTT the LF/HF ratio was higher in patients who later developed syncope than in no-syncope patients. This ratio was significantly different among patients with syncope, presyncope or without symptoms at the time of syncope (p value = 0.02). In conclusion, cuffless RootiRx® was unable to detect rapid drops of SBP occurring during impending reflex syncope and thus cannot be used as a diagnostic tool for hypotensive syncope. On the other hand, RRI mean values and LF/HF power ratios obtained with RootiRx® were consistent with those simultaneously obtained using conventional methods.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the reliability and feasibility of blood pressure (BP) measurements by means of a new wearable watch-type BP monitor (HeartGuide) in detecting episodes of hypotensive (pre)syncope induced by tilt table test. METHODS AND RESULTS: An intrapatient comparison between systolic BP (SBP) measured by means of the HeartGuide device and noninvasive finger beat-to-beat BP monitoring was undertaken both at baseline in supine position and repeatedly during tilt table test in patients evaluated for reflex syncope. Intrapatient fall of systolic BP from baseline was measured. Eighty-one patients (mean age, 61±19 years; 46 women) were included. Overall, HeartGuide was able to yield BP values at the time of BP nadir in 58 (72%) patients (average HeartGuide SBP 102±18 mm Hg, versus finger SBP 101±19 mm Hg). Compared with baseline, the maximum SBP decrease was on average −28.5±27.8 and −30.3±33.9 mm Hg respectively (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient=0.78, r=0.79, P=0.001). In the subgroup of 38 patients with tilt table test induced (pre)syncope, the average HeartGuide SBP during symptoms was 97±16 mm Hg, and the finger SBP was 94±18 mm Hg. Compared with baseline, the maximum SBP decrease was on average −35.2±29.3 and −43.3±31.8 mm Hg, respectively (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient=0.83, r=0.87, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the HeartGuide BP monitor can detect low BP during presyncope and that its measure of SBP change is consistent with that simultaneously obtained through continuous BP monitoring, despite some intrapatient variability. Thus, this device might be useful in determining the hypotensive nature of spontaneous (pre)syncopal symptoms, a possibility that should be verified by field studies.

Aims: Diagnostic criteria for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with suspected reflex syncope are lacking. The study hypothesis was that patients with reflex syncope have a higher prevalence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops on ABPM. Methods and results: ABPM data from reflex syncope patients and controls, matched by average 24h SBP, age, sex, and hypertension were compared. Patients with constitutional hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, and predominant cardioinhibition during carotid sinus massage or prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring or competing causes of syncope were excluded. Daytime and nighttime SBP drops (<110, 100, 90, 80mmHg) were assessed. Findings were validated in an independent sample. In the derivation sample, daytime SBP drops were significantly more common in 158 syncope patients than 329 controls. One or more daytime drops <90mmHg achieved 91% specificity and 32% sensitivity [odds ratio (OR) 4.6, P < 0.001]. Two or more daytime drops <100mmHg achieved 84% specificity and 40% sensitivity (OR 3.5, P = 0.001). Results were confirmed in the validation sample of 164 syncope patients and 164 controls: one or more daytime SBP drops <90mmHg achieved 94% specificity and 29% sensitivity (OR 6.2, P < 0.001), while two or more daytime SBP drops <100mmHg achieved 83% specificity and 35% sensitivity (OR 2.6, P < 0.001) Conclusion: SBP drops during ABPM are more common in reflex syncope patients than in controls. Cut-off values that may be applied in clinical practice are defined. This study expands the current indications for ABPM to patients with reflex syncope.

Objective: To compare one-year mortality risk associated with syncope and unexplained fall in older adults with dementia. Methods: 522 patients (aged >65 years) with dementia and history of transient loss of consciousness and/or unexplained falls were evaluated. The diagnosis of syncope was based on European Society of Cardiology guidelines. A “Syncopal Fall” was defined in patients with an initial clinical presentation of unexplained fall, but a final diagnosis of syncope after complete assessment. A “Truly Unexplained Fall” was defined in patients with an initial clinical presentation of unexplained fall, in whom a diagnosis of syncope had been excluded after the diagnostic work-up. One-year follow-up was assessed by phone interview. Results: Follow-up data were available for 501 participants (mean age 83 ± 6 years, 65% female). After a mean follow-up of 324 ± 93 days, death from any cause was reported in 188 participants (24%). Advanced age, male sex, cognitive and functional impairment were associated with a higher mortality rate. Patients with “Truly Unexplained Falls” had a higher mortality risk compared with syncope and “Syncopal Fall”. A diagnosis of “Truly Unexplained Falls” remained an independent predictor of one-year all-cause mortality in multivariate model. Conclusions: We propose the novel diagnostic category of “Truly Unexplained Fall”, resulting from the application of syncope guidelines to subjects with unexplained falls. This condition in older adults with dementia is a predictor of one-year all-cause mortality. For this new high risk profile, we advice a comprehensive geriatric assessment focused on risk factors for fall, aimed at a possible improvement of prognosis.

Managing hypertension in syncope patients requires the accurate balancing of hypotensive and cardiovascular risks. On the basis of the available literature, this study analyses the complex inter-relationship between these clinical problems and presents an algorithm strategy to guide hypertension management in patients affected by syncope episodes. A SBP target of 120mmHg is recommended in patients with a low syncope risk and a high cardiovascular risk. In patients with a high syncope risk and a low cardiovascular risk, and in older (70R) frail individuals, a less intensive treatment is advisable, targeting SBP of 140 mmHg. SBP values up to 160mmHg can be tolerated in severe frailty or disability. Patients with hypertension and syncope may benefit from team-based care by a 'Blood Pressure Team' including experts on hypertension and syncope and a geriatrician. The team should carry out a multidimensional assessment to balance syncope and cardiovascular risk and develop therapeutic strategies customized to individuals' frailty and functional status.

Background: Dementia patients have an increased risk of fall, and some of them might suffer from undiagnosed syncope. The present analysis aimed at identifying predictors of differential diagnosis between syncopal and non-syncopal fall in patients with dementia included in the “Syncope & Dementia” registry. Methods: We enrolled patients aged 65 + with a diagnosis of dementia and a history of syncope and/or unexplained fall. All subjects underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment, including the syncope protocol of the European Society of Cardiology. Subjects whose syncope diagnosis was confirmed were labeled as “Confirmed Syncope” (CS). Patients with unexplained fall were labeled as “Syncopal Fall” (SF), if a final diagnosis of syncope was performed, or as “Non-Syncopal Fall” (NSF), if syncope was excluded. Results: We included 372 subjects (mean age 84, 61% females). Mini Mental State Examination score was higher among SF (18.5 ± 4.9) compared to NSF patients (15.6 ± 5.8, p = 0.02). In a multinomial logistic regression model with NSF as the reference group, CS patients less often suffered injuries and more often reported history of syncope, while patients with SF had a better cognitive status and were more often exposed to precipitating factors, including postural changes and neck movements. The absence of prodromes and the intake of benzodiazepines and insulin was highest in NSF patients. A simple score including main clinical predictors showed an 82% sensitivity with a 56% specificity in discriminating SF from NSF patients. Conclusion: Simple clinical markers can aid in the differential diagnosis of unexplained falls in dementia, separating syncopal from non-syncopal falls.

Objectives: To investigate the etiology of transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) suspected to be syncope and unexplained falls in elderly adults with dementia. Design: Prospective, observational, multicenter study. Setting: Acute care wards, syncope units or centers for the diagnosis of dementia. Participants: Individuals aged 65 and older with a diagnosis of dementia and one or more episodes of T-LOC of a suspected syncopal nature or unexplained falls during the previous 3 months were enrolled. Measurements: The causes of T-LOC suspected to be syncope and unexplained falls were evaluated using a simplified protocol based on European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Results: Of 357 individuals enrolled, 181 (50.7%) had been referred for T-LOC suspected to be syncope, 166 (46.5%) for unexplained falls, and 10 (2.8%) for both. An initially suspected diagnosis of syncope was confirmed in 158 (87.3%), and syncope was identified as the cause of the event in 75 (45.2%) of those referred for unexplained falls. Orthostatic hypotension was the cause of the event in 117 of 242 (48.3%) participants with a final diagnosis of syncope. Conclusion: The simplified syncope diagnostic protocol can be used in elderly people with dementia referred for suspected syncope or unexplained falls. Unexplained falls may mask a diagnosis of syncope or pseudosyncope in almost 50% of cases. Given the high prevalence of orthostatic syncope in participants (~50%), a systematic reappraisal of drugs potentially responsible for orthostatic hypotension is warranted.