1. Assessment of CO2 desorption from 13X zeolite for a prospective TSA process
- Author
-
Rafaelle Gomes Santiago, Rafael Morales-Ospino, Moises Bastos-Neto, Rafael Magalhães Siqueira, and Diana C. S. Azevedo
- Subjects
Flue gas ,Materials science ,General Chemical Engineering ,Analytical chemistry ,chemistry.chemical_element ,02 engineering and technology ,Surfaces and Interfaces ,General Chemistry ,010402 general chemistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,01 natural sciences ,0104 chemical sciences ,Adsorption ,chemistry ,Phase (matter) ,Desorption ,0210 nano-technology ,Selectivity ,Zeolite ,Helium ,Bar (unit) - Abstract
In this study, two configurations of Temperature Swing Adsorption (TSA) were assessed with the aim of evaluating their efficacy on CO2 capture on commercial adsorbent zeolite 13X within a post-combustion scenario. A fixed bed setup was employed to measure breakthrough curves from the adsorption and desorption steps. Considering a dry desulfurized flue gas stream, breakthrough curves for CO2–N2 (15/75 % v/v) in Helium were performed at 25, 50 and 75 °C. The desorption step was carried out following two TSA regeneration strategies: a two-step desorption arrangement (configuration 1) consisting of a purging phase followed by a heating-purging phase, and a one-step desorption arrangement (configuration 2) involving only the heating-purging phase. Adsorption equilibrium isotherms were also obtained for pure CO2 (25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 °C) and N2 (25, 50 and 75 °C) on zeolite 13X in the range of 0–1 bar. Finally, a mathematical model considering mass and energy differential balances was used to predict the whole adsorption-desorption history. The results obtained on breakthrough curves showed that CO2 separation from N2 on zeolite 13X is accomplished by adsorption under the studied conditions with a marked selectivity for CO2. In regards to the desorption phase, configuration 1 may not be adequate for an integration of adsorption-desorption steps once only the purge phase duplicates the desorption time as compared to the adsorption stage. On the other hand, configuration 2 is more likely to synchronize the whole adsorption—desorption process since the regeneration time was significantly reduced by this strategy. However, configuration 1 managed to obtain full CO2 recovery with all the temperatures tested during the heating step, whereas configuration 2 reached recovery values around 92%. Moderate temperatures (e.g. 125–150 °C) are feasible to be used for configuration 2 regeneration strategy so as to avoid energy penalties. Simulations were able to reproduce well the experimental breakthrough curves, even though some discrepancies were observed in the desorption histories.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF