Search

Cross-presentation is an important mechanism for the differentiation of effector cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) from naïve CD8+ T-cells, a key response for the clearance of intracellular pathogens and tumors. The liposomal co-encapsulation of the pore-forming protein sticholysin II (StII) with ovalbumin (OVA) (Lp/OVA/StII) induces a powerful OVA-specific CTL activation and an anti-tumor response in vivo. However, the pathway through which the StII contained in this preparation is able to induce antigen cross-presentation and the type of professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) involved have not been elucidated. Here, the ability of mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BM-DCs) and macrophages (BM-MΦs) stimulated with Lp/OVA/StII to activate SIINFEKL-specific B3Z CD8+ T cells was evaluated in the presence of selected inhibitors. BM-MΦs, but not BM-DCs were able to induce SIINFEKL-specific B3Z CD8+ T cell activation upon stimulation with Lp/OVA/StII. The cross-presentation of OVA was markedly decreased by the lysosome protease inhibitors, leupeptin and cathepsin general inhibitor, while it was unaffected by the proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin. This process was also significantly reduced by phagocytosis and Golgi apparatus function inhibitors, cytochalasin D and brefeldin A, respectively. These results are consistent with the concept that BM-MΦs internalize these liposomes through a phagocytic mechanism resulting in the cross-presentation of the encapsulated OVA by the vacuolar pathway. The contribution of macrophages to the CTL response induced by Lp/OVA/StII in vivo was determined by depleting macrophages with clodronate-containing liposomes. CTL induction was almost completely abrogated in mice depleted of macrophages, demonstrating the relevance of these APCs in the antigen cross-presentation induced by this formulation.

Introducción: Las estrategias vacunales para potenciar respuestas de linfocitos T CD8+ citotóxicos (CTL) constituyen un reto debido a la necesidad de favorecer la presentación cruzada de antígenos (Ag) exógenos por las células presentadoras de antígenos (APC). Con este propósito se han empleado liposomas que encapsulan proteínas formadoras de poros (PFP) de origen bacteriano. Objetivo: explorar la habilidad de liposomas que co-encapsulan el Ag ovoalbúmina (OVA) y sticholysina II (StII), una PFP producida por Stichodactyla helianthus, de inducir una respuesta de CTL, funcional en un modelo tumoral. Métodos: Liposomas que co-encapsulaban OVA y StII se prepararon mediante deshidratación-rehidratación (Lp/OVA/StII). Se evaluó la respuesta de CTL, así como la actividad antitumoral en un escenario preventivo. La capacidad de StII de estimular la maduración de las células dendríticas (DC) in vitro fue también explorada. Resultados: Lp/OVA/StII potenció la respuesta de CTL específica a OVA y una actividad antitumoral en ratones retados con el tumor E.G7-OVA. StII indujo la maduración de las DC in vitro, lo que resultó dependiente del receptor tipo Toll 4 (TLR4), con una contribución en la respuesta de CTL inducida por la formulación liposomal in vivo. Lp/OVA/StII favoreció in vitro la presentación cruzada de OVA y la activación de células T CD8+ por macrófagos, pero no por DC. Estos resultados son la primera evidencia de que StII encapsulada en liposomas funciona como una plataforma vacunal para inducir una respuesta de CTL robusta, con una contribución que va más allá de su habilidad de formar poros en membranas.

Abstract Background Dietary isothiocyanates (ITCs) are electrophilic compounds that have diverse biological activities including induction of apoptosis and effects on cell cycle. They protect against experimental carcinogenesis in animals, an activity believed to result from the transcriptional induction of "Phase 2" enzymes. The molecular mechanism of action of ITCs is unknown. Since ITCs are electrophiles capable of reacting with sulfhydryl groups on amino acids, we hypothesized that ITCs induce their biological effects through covalent modification of proteins, leading to changes in cell regulatory events. We previously demonstrated that stress-signaling kinase pathways are inhibited by other electrophilic compounds such as menadione. We therefore tested the effects of nutritional ITCs on MEKK1, an upstream regulator of the SAPK/JNK signal transduction pathway. Methods The activity of MEKK1 expressed in cells was monitored using in vitro kinase assays to measure changes in catalytic activity. The activity of endogenous MEKK1, immunopurified from ITC treated and untreated LnCAP cells was also measured by in vitro kinase assay. A novel labeling and affinity reagent for detection of protein modification by ITCs was synthesized and used in competition assays to monitor direct modification of MEKK1 by ITC. Finally, immunoblots with phospho-specific antibodies were used to measure the activity of MAPK protein kinases. Results ITCs inhibited the MEKK1 protein kinase in a manner dependent on a specific cysteine residue in the ATP binding pocket. Inhibition of MEKK1 catalytic activity was due to direct, covalent and irreversible modification of the MEKK1 protein itself. In addition, ITCs inhibited the catalytic activity of endogenous MEKK1. This correlated with inhibition of the downstream target of MEKK1 activity, i.e. the SAPK/JNK kinase. This inhibition was specific to SAPK, as parallel MAPK pathways were unaffected. Conclusion These results demonstrate that MEKK1 is directly modified and inhibited by ITCs, and that this correlates with inhibition of downstream activation of SAPK. These results support the conclusion that ITCs may carry out many of their actions by directly targeting important cell regulatory proteins.

Oxidation of cysteine residues of proteins is emerging as an important means of regulation of signal transduction, particularly of protein kinase function. Tools to detect and quantify cysteine oxidation of proteins have been a limiting factor in understanding the role of cysteine oxidation in signal transduction. As an example, the p38 MAP kinase is activated by several stress-related stimuli that are often accompanied by in vitro generation of hydrogen peroxide. We noted that hydrogen peroxide inhibited p38 activity despite paradoxically increasing the activating phosphorylation of p38. To address the possibility that cysteine oxidation may provide a negative regulatory effect on p38 activity, we developed a biochemical assay to detect reversible cysteine oxidation in intact cells. This procedure, PROP, demonstrated in vivo oxidation of p38 in response to hydrogen peroxide and also to the natural inflammatory lipid prostaglandin J2. Mutagenesis of the potential target cysteines showed that oxidation occurred preferentially on residues near the surface of the p38 molecule. Cysteine oxidation thus controls a functional redox switch regulating the intensity or duration of p38 activity that would not be revealed by immunodetection of phosphoprotein commonly interpreted as reflective of p38 activity.

Spinal dynorphin A(1-17) (Dyn) has been shown previously to produce an antianalgesic action against intrathecal morphine in the tail-flick test in CD-1 mice. This action is known to be mediated indirectly from the spinal cord through an afferent pathway that activates flumazenil-sensitive benzodiazepine receptors in the brain and a descending circuit back down to the spinal cord sequentially involving cholecystokinin, leu-enkephalin, and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors to produce antianalgesia. Interleukin (IL)-1beta is also known to act on peripheral afferent nerves to the brain to activate a descending circuit to release spinal cholecystokinin. The present investigation determined whether IL1beta is a supraspinal mediator for intrathecal Dyn-induced antianalgesia in CD-1 mice. Intracerebroventricular Lys193-D-Pro-Thr195, an IL1beta antagonist, or pretreatment with IL1beta antiserum eliminated intrathecal dynorphin antianalgesia, implicating brain IL1beta; 10 ng of IL(1beta) given intracerebroventricularly produced antianalgesia. Fittingly, Dyn was not antianalgesic in C3H/HeJ mice, which are genetically deficient in release of IL1beta. Activation of central benzodiazepine receptors preceded the IL1beta step because flumazenil inhibited Dyn but not IL1beta antianalgesia. On the other hand, [1-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-(1-methylpropyl)-3-isoquinolinecarboxamide], an antagonist for peripheral benzodiazepine receptors that have also recently been detected in brain tissue, inhibited IL1beta antianalgesia; these latter benzodiazepine receptors formed a separate step after the flumazenil-sensitive benzodiazepine receptor step. IL1beta action in the brain was linked to the linear steps in the spinal cord (cholecystokinin/N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors) as shown by inhibition with appropriate antagonists. Thus, IL1beta is a central physiological mediator in the antianalgesic action evoked by spinal dynorphin.

Dynorphin A(1-17) given intrathecally releases spinal cholecystokinin to produce an antianalgesic action against spinal morphine in the tail-flick test in CD-1 mice. The present study showed that following the cholecystokinin step, a delta(2)-opioid inverse agonist action of Leu-enkephalin (LE), was involved. Pretreatment with intrathecal LE antiserum eliminated dynorphin and cholecystokinin-8s antianalgesia. A small dose of LE intrathecally produced antianalgesia that like that from dynorphin A(1-17) and cholecystokinin was eliminated by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (delta(2)- and delta(1)-opioid receptor antagonist, respectively). This LE step was followed by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation. MK801, an NMDA receptor antagonist, eliminated the antianalgesia from dynorphin A(1-17), cholecystokinin-8s, and LE. Furthermore, none of the three were effective against morphine analgesia in 129S6/SvEv mice possibly because of their deficiency in NMDA receptor response. In 129S6/SvEv mice, [D-Ser(2)]-Leu-enkephalin-Thr analgesia was not attenuated by LE; thus, this delta(2)-analgesic agonist and LE inverse agonist action did not occur through competition at the same delta(2)-receptor in CD-1 mice. In CD-1 mice, a linear sequence of dynorphin A(1-17) --> cholecystokinin --> LE --> NMDA receptors was indicated: cholecystokinin antiserum inhibited cholecystokinin but not LE; naltriben inhibited LE but not NMDA. The uniqueness of LE in linking dynorphin A(1-17), cholecystokinin, delta(2)-opioid, and NMDA receptor activation may unify the separate known mechanisms involved in the antiopioid actions of these components against morphine.

An antianalgesic action of intracerebroventricularly administered nociceptin was elicited against intrathecal morphine-induced antinociception in the tail-flick test in mice and investigated as a descending neuronal system for the spinal mediator involved. The nociceptin-induced antianalgesia originating in the brain was inhibited by intrathecally administered indomethacin and suggested the mediation of spinal prostaglandin. The antianalgesic action of intracerebroventricular nociceptin was closely matched by intrathecal prostaglandin (PG) E(2). Both shifted the dose-response curve of morphine to the right and these actions were eliminated by intrathecal PGD(2.) Desensitization of the antianalgesic action of PGE(2) by intrathecal PGE(2) pretreatment also produced cross-desensitization to the antianalgesic action of intracerebroventricular nociceptin. Neither intracerebroventricular nociceptin nor intrathecal PGE(2) produced antianalgesia against the delta-receptor agonists given intrathecally. Thus, the antianalgesic action of nociceptin originating in the brain is coupled to a descending neuronal pathway mediated by spinal PGE(2).

Heroin produced antinociception in the tail flick test through mu receptors in the brain of ICR and CD-1 mice, a response inhibited by 3-O-methylnaltrexone. Tolerance to morphine was produced by subcutaneous morphine pellet implantation. By the third day, the heroin response was produced through delta opioid receptors. The response was inhibited by simultaneous intracerebroventricular (i.c. v.) administration of naltrindole, a delta opioid receptor antagonist. More specifically, delta1 rather than delta2 receptors were involved because 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, a delta1 receptor antagonist, inhibited but naltriben, a delta2 antagonist, did not. Also, antinociception produced by i.c.v. heroin was inhibited by intrathecal administration of bicuculline and picrotoxin consistent with the concept that delta1 receptors in the brain mediated the antinociceptive response through descending neuronal pathways to the spinal cord to activate GABAA and GABAB receptors rather than spinal alpha2-adrenergic and serotonergic receptors activated originally by the mu agonist action in naive mice. The mu response of 6-monoacetylmorphine, a metabolite of heroin, was changed by morphine pellet implantation to a delta2 response (inhibited by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone). The agonist action of morphine in these morphine-tolerant mice remained mu. Thus, the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine in the brain is changed by production of tolerance to morphine. Such a change explains how morphine tolerant mice are not cross-tolerant to heroin.

It is generally thought that the mu receptor actions of metabolites, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6MAM) and morphine, account for the pharmacological actions of heroin. However, upon intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration in Swiss Webster mice, heroin and 6MAM act on delta receptors while morphine acts on mu receptors. Swiss Webster mice made tolerant to subcutaneous (s.c.) morphine by morphine pellet were not cross-tolerant to s.c. heroin (at 20 min in the tail flick test). Now, opioids were given in combination, s.c. (6.5 h) and i.c.v. (3 h) preceding testing the challenging agonist i.c.v. (at 10 min in the tail flick test). The combination (s.c. + i.c.v.) morphine pretreatment induced tolerance to the mu action of morphine but no cross-tolerance to the delta action of heroin, 6MAM and DPDPE and explained why morphine pelleting did not produce cross-tolerance to s.c. heroin above. Heroin plus heroin produced tolerance to delta agonists but not to mu agonists. Surprisingly, all combinations of morphine with the delta agonists produced tolerance to morphine which now acted through delta receptors (inhibited by i.c.v. naltrindole), an unusual change in receptor selectivity for morphine.

Previous work indicates that the antianalgesic action of pentobarbital and neurotensin administered intracerebroventricularly in mice arises from activation of a descending system to release cholecystokinin (CCK) in the spinal cord where CCK is known to antagonize morphine analgesia. Spinal dynorphin, like CCK, has an antianalgesic action against intrathecally administered morphine. This dynorphin action is indirect; even though it is initiated in the spinal cord, it requires the involvement of an ascending pathway to the brain and a descending pathway to the spinal cord where an antianalgesic mediator works. The aim of the present investigation was to determine if the antianalgesic action of intrathecal dynorphin A involved spinal CCK. All drugs were administered intrathecally to mice in the tail flick test. Morphine analgesia was inhibited by dynorphin as shown by a rightward shift of the morphine dose-response curve. The effect of dynorphin was eliminated by administration of the CCK receptor antagonists lorglumide and PD135 158. One hour pretreatment with CCK antiserum also eliminated the action of dynorphin. On the other hand, the antianalgesic action of CCK was not affected by dynorphin antiserum. Thus, CCK did not release dynorphin. Both CCK and dynorphin were antianalgesic against DSLET but not DPDPE, delta 2 and delta 1 opioid receptor peptide agonists, respectively. The results suggest that the antianalgesic action of dynorphin occurred through an indirect mechanism ultimately dependent on the action of spinal CCK.

Intracerebral injection of neurotensin into specific brain loci in rats produces hyperalgesia due to the release of cholecystokinin (CCK) in the spinal cord. The present purpose was to show in another species that neurotensin can antagonize the antinociceptive action of morphine through the spinal CCK mechanism in mice. Neurotensin given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) at doses higher than 100 ng produced antinociception in the tail flick test. However, at lower doses between 1 pg to 25 ng, neurotensin antagonized the antinociceptive action of morphine given intrathecally (i.t.), thus demonstrating the antianalgesic activity of neurotensin. The rightward shift in the morphine dose-response curve produced by i.c.v. neurotensin was eliminated by an i.t. pretreatment with CCK8 antibody (5 microl of antiserum solution diluted 1:1000). I.t. administration of lorglumide, a CCK(A)-receptor antagonist (10-1000 ng), and PD135,158, a CCK(B)-receptor antagonist (250-500 ng), also eliminated the antianalgesic action of neurotensin. Thus, the mechanism of the antianalgesic action of neurotensin given i.c.v. involved spinal CCK. This mode of action is similar to that for the antianalgesic action of supraspinal pentobarbital which also involves spinal CCK.

Heroin administered i.c.v. acts on supraspinal mu opioid receptors in ICR mice but on delta receptors in Swiss Webster mice. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree to which genotype plays a role in the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin across a range of fully inbred strains of mice. Six inbred strains were given heroin i.c.v. 10 min before the tail-flick test. Differences in the descending neurotransmitter systems involved in supraspinal opioid-induced analgesia were evaluated as the first step. Antagonism by bicuculline given intrathecally indicated the involvement of supraspinal delta receptors in activating spinal gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors; antagonism by intrathecal methysergide indicated either mu or kappa receptor involvement. Antagonism by intrathecal yohimbine implicated mu and eliminated kappa receptor involvement. Intracerbroventricular opioid antagonists (beta-funaltrexamine, 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, naltriben, or nor-binaltorphimine) provided further differentiation. Based on these initial results, receptor selectivity was determined by more extensive ED50 experiments with i.c.v. administration of heroin with opioid antagonists, beta-funaltrexamine (for mu), naltrindole (for delta), and nor-binaltorphimine (for kappa). The combined results indicated that heroin analgesia was predominantly mediated in C57BL/6J by delta, in DBA/2J and CBA/J by mu, and in BALB/cByJ and AKR/J by kappa receptors. The response in C3H/HeJ appeared to involve mu receptors. The results indicate that the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin is genotype-dependent. Because these genotypes are fully inbred, the genetically determined molecular and neurochemical substrate mediating the different opioid receptor selectivities of heroin can be studied further.