Search

Metabolic fluxes, the number of metabolites traversing each biochemical reaction in a cell per unit time, are crucial for assessing and understanding cell function. 13C Metabolic Flux Analysis (13C MFA) is considered to be the gold standard for measuring metabolic fluxes. 13C MFA typically works by leveraging extracellular exchange fluxes as well as data from 13C labeling experiments to calculate the flux profile which best fit the data for a small, central carbon, metabolic model. However, the nonlinear nature of the 13C MFA fitting procedure means that several flux profiles fit the experimental data within the experimental error, and traditional optimization methods offer only a partial or skewed picture, especially in "non-gaussian" situations where multiple very distinct flux regions fit the data equally well. Here, we present a method for flux space sampling through Bayesian inference (BayFlux), that identifies the full distribution of fluxes compatible with experimental data for a comprehensive genome-scale model. This Bayesian approach allows us to accurately quantify uncertainty in calculated fluxes. We also find that, surprisingly, the genome-scale model of metabolism produces narrower flux distributions (reduced uncertainty) than the small core metabolic models traditionally used in 13C MFA. The different results for some reactions when using genome-scale models vs core metabolic models advise caution in assuming strong inferences from 13C MFA since the results may depend significantly on the completeness of the model used. Based on BayFlux, we developed and evaluated novel methods (P-13C MOMA and P-13C ROOM) to predict the biological results of a gene knockout, that improve on the traditional MOMA and ROOM methods by quantifying prediction uncertainty., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: J.D.K. has financial interests in Amyris, Ansa Biotechnologies, Apertor Pharma, Berkeley Yeast, Cyklos Materials, Demetrix, Lygos, Napigen, ResVita Bio and Zero Acre Farms., (Copyright: © 2023 Backman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Self-driving labs (SDLs) combine fully automated experiments with artificial intelligence (AI) that decides the next set of experiments. Taken to their ultimate expression, SDLs could usher a new paradigm of scientific research, where the world is probed, interpreted, and explained by machines for human benefit. While there are functioning SDLs in the fields of chemistry and materials science, we contend that synthetic biology provides a unique opportunity since the genome provides a single target for affecting the incredibly wide repertoire of biological cell behavior. However, the level of investment required for the creation of biological SDLs is only warranted if directed toward solving difficult and enabling biological questions. Here, we discuss challenges and opportunities in creating SDLs for synthetic biology., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The growing capabilities of synthetic biology and organic chemistry demand tools to guide syntheses toward useful molecules. Here, we present Molecular AutoenCoding Auto-Workaround (MACAW), a tool that uses a novel approach to generate molecules predicted to meet a desired property specification (e.g., a binding affinity of 50 nM or an octane number of 90). MACAW describes molecules by embedding them into a smooth multidimensional numerical space, avoiding uninformative dimensions that previous methods often introduce. The coordinates in this embedding provide a natural choice of features for accurately predicting molecular properties, which we demonstrate with examples for cetane and octane numbers, flash points, and histamine H1 receptor binding affinity. The approach is computationally efficient and well-suited to the small- and medium-size datasets commonly used in biosciences. We showcase the utility of MACAW for virtual screening by identifying molecules with high predicted binding affinity to the histamine H1 receptor and limited affinity to the muscarinic M2 receptor, which are targets of medicinal relevance. Combining these predictive capabilities with a novel generative algorithm for molecules allows us to recommend molecules with a desired property value (i.e., inverse molecular design). We demonstrate this capability by recommending molecules with predicted octane numbers of 40, 80, and 120, which is an important characteristic of biofuels. Thus, MACAW augments classical retrosynthesis tools by providing recommendations for molecules on specification.

Biology has changed radically in the past two decades, growing from a purely descriptive science into also a design science. The availability of tools that enable the precise modification of cells, as well as the ability to collect large amounts of multimodal data, open the possibility of sophisticated bioengineering to produce fuels, specialty and commodity chemicals, materials, and other renewable bioproducts. However, despite new tools and exponentially increasing data volumes, synthetic biology cannot yet fulfill its true potential due to our inability to predict the behavior of biological systems. Here, we showcase a set of computational tools that, combined, provide the ability to store, visualize, and leverage multiomics data to predict the outcome of bioengineering efforts. We show how to upload, visualize, and output multiomics data, as well as strain information, into online repositories for several isoprenol-producing strain designs. We then use these data to train machine learning algorithms that recommend new strain designs that are correctly predicted to improve isoprenol production by 23%. This demonstration is done by using synthetic data, as provided by a novel library, that can produce credible multiomics data for testing algorithms and computational tools. In short, this paper provides a step-by-step tutorial to leverage these computational tools to improve production in bioengineered strains., Competing Interests: NH declares financial interests in TeselaGen Biotechnologies, and Ansa Biotechnologies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Roy, Radivojevic, Forrer, Marti, Jonnalagadda, Backman, Morrell, Plahar, Kim, Hillson and Garcia Martin.)

Machine learning provides researchers a unique opportunity to make metabolic engineering more predictable. In this review, we offer an introduction to this discipline in terms that are relatable to metabolic engineers, as well as providing in-depth illustrative examples leveraging omics data and improving production. We also include practical advice for the practitioner in terms of data management, algorithm libraries, computational resources, and important non-technical issues. A variety of applications ranging from pathway construction and optimization, to genetic editing optimization, cell factory testing, and production scale-up are discussed. Moreover, the promising relationship between machine learning and mechanistic models is thoroughly reviewed. Finally, the future perspectives and most promising directions for this combination of disciplines are examined., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Through advanced mechanistic modeling and the generation of large high-quality datasets, machine learning is becoming an integral part of understanding and engineering living systems. Here we show that mechanistic and machine learning models can be combined to enable accurate genotype-to-phenotype predictions. We use a genome-scale model to pinpoint engineering targets, efficient library construction of metabolic pathway designs, and high-throughput biosensor-enabled screening for training diverse machine learning algorithms. From a single data-generation cycle, this enables successful forward engineering of complex aromatic amino acid metabolism in yeast, with the best machine learning-guided design recommendations improving tryptophan titer and productivity by up to 74 and 43%, respectively, compared to the best designs used for algorithm training. Thus, this study highlights the power of combining mechanistic and machine learning models to effectively direct metabolic engineering efforts.

Our inability to predict the behavior of biological systems severely hampers progress in bioengineering and biomedical applications. We cannot predict the effect of genotype changes on phenotype, nor extrapolate the large-scale behavior from small-scale experiments. Machine learning techniques recently reached a new level of maturity, and are capable of providing the needed predictive power without a detailed mechanistic understanding. However, they require large amounts of data to be trained. The amount and quality of data required can only be produced through a combination of synthetic biology and automation, so as to generate a large diversity of biological systems with high reproducibility. A sustained investment in the intersection of synthetic biology, machine learning, and automation will drive forward predictive biology, and produce improved machine learning algorithms.