Search

The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) updated a new target volume delineation guideline for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after implant-based reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact on breast complications with the new guideline compared to the conventional guidelines. In total, 308 patients who underwent PMRT after tissue expander or permanent implant insertion from 2016 to 2021 were included; 184 received PMRT by the new ESTRO-ACROP target delineation (ESTRO-T), and 124 by conventional target delineation (CONV-T). The endpoints were major breast complications (infection, necrosis, dehiscence, capsular contracture, animation deformity, and rupture) requiring re-operation or re-hospitalization and any grade ≥2 breast complications. With a median follow-up of 36.4 months, the cumulative incidence rates of major breast complications at 1, 2, and 3 years were 6.6%, 10.3%, and 12.6% in the ESTRO-T group, and 9.7%, 15.4%, and 16.3% in the CONV-T group; it did not show a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.56). In multivariable analyses, target delineation is not associated with the major complications (sHR = 0.87; p = 0.77). There was no significant difference in any breast complications (3-year incidence, 18.9% vs. 23.3%, respectively; p = 0.56). Symptomatic RT-induced pneumonitis was developed in six (3.2%) and three (2.4%) patients, respectively. One local recurrence occurred in the ESTRO-T group, which was within the ESTRO-target volume. The new ESTRO-ACROP target volume guideline did not demonstrate significant differences in major or any breast complications, although it showed a tendency of reduced complication risks. As the dosimetric benefits of normal organs and comparable oncologic outcomes have been reported, further analyses with long-term follow-up are necessary to evaluate whether it could be connected to better clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting have mutiple clinical consequences: delay or refusal of irradiation (decreased antineoplastic efficacy of irradiation), altered quality of life, dehydration, malnutrition, interruption of treatment, decompensation of comorbidities and aspiration. These guidelines aim at defining good clinical practices for management of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV)., Methods: AFSOS, SFRO, SFH, SFNEP, SFCE and GFRP applied an expert consensus methodology to propose updated guidelines., Results: RINV are underdiagnosed and undertreated. Assessment of the emetogenic risk depends on two main factors: 1) the irradiated anatomical localization and 2) the associated concomitant chemotherapy. In case of exclusive radiotherapy, primary antiemetic prophylaxis depends on the emetogenic risk of irradiated anatomical localization. Primary antiemetic prophylaxis is initiated at the onset of irradiation and continues until 24h after the end of the irradiation. In the case of concomitant radiochemotherapy, the emetogenic risk is generally higher for chemotherapy and the primary antiemetic prophylaxis corresponds to that of chemo-induced nausea and vomiting. In the case of persistence of these symptoms, subject to a well-conducted treatment, a rigorous diagnostic procedure must be carried out before being attributed to radiotherapy and precise evaluation of their impact. Remedial treatments are less well codified., Conclusion: It is essential to know and good management practices for radiation-induced nausea and vomiting., (Copyright © 2024 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

With the advancements in conventional treatment modalities such as radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, as well as the emergence of immunotherapy, the overall cure rate for solid tumor malignancies has experienced a significant increase. However, it is unfortunate that exposure to cancer treatments can have detrimental effects on the function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, disturbing bone metabolic homeostasis in patients, as well as causing damage to bone marrow cells and other bone tissues. Consequently, certain tumor treatment options may pose a risk for subsequent bone diseases. Common bone disorders associated with cancer treatment include osteonecrosis, bone loss, and secondary bone tumors. (1)Cancer treatment-related osteonecrosis is primarily linked to the use of radiation therapy and certain chemicals, such as bisphosphonates, denosumab, antiangiogenic agents, and immunomodulators. It has been observed that high-dose radiation therapy is more likely to result in osteonecrosis. (2)Chemicals and hormones, particularly sex hormones, glucocorticoids, and thyroid hormones or thyrotropic hormones, are among the factors that can contribute to cancer treatment-related bone loss. (3)Secondary bone tumors differ from metastases originating from primary tumors, and radiotherapy plays a significant role in their development, while chemotherapy may also exert some influence. Radiogenic secondary bone tumors are predominantly malignant, with osteosarcoma being the most common type. Chemotherapy may be a risk factor for the relatively rare occurrence of secondary Ewing sarcoma of the bone. These treatment-related bone disorders have a considerable adverse impact on the prognosis of cancer patients. Hence, it is imperative to prioritize the bone health of patients undergoing cancer treatment and give it further attention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Trismus is a potentially critical morbidity following curative-intended radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. However, in this setting, evidence regarding this side effect remains to be fully defined, particularly in terms of dosimetric parameters., Materials and Methods: Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used., Results: This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of the evidence on radiation-induced trismus in the literature, particularly the dosimetric concerns., Conclusions: The treatment goal should be to maintain high cure rates and limit the onset of complications. Further evaluations of dosimetric measures and clinical outcomes are warranted to identify patients at higher risk to target treatment tailoring., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Radiodermatitis (RD) is an adverse effect of radiation therapy. RD can negatively impact quality of life and can also hinder treatment in cancer patients. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has the potential to treat RD at the cellular level, and it is more promising compared to other therapy alternatives. This review aims to examine the effectiveness of PBMT for the treatment and management of RD in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy., Methods: The methodology followed for the review was based on the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, and the extensions by Levac et al. This involved a literature search in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane without any time limit, for original articles on the basis of the inclusion criteria, i.e., studies focusing on the effectiveness of PBMT on RD in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy as an anticancer treatment. The review has been reported on the basis of the PRISMA-ScR checklist., Results: A total of 14 studies were reviewed, of which only 2 (14.28%) studies reported no significant effect of PBMT on RD; the remaining studies reported positive outcomes (85.71%) with no adverse effects. Among studies with positive outcomes, PBMT has been shown to be beneficial in reducing the severity of RD. Furthermore, PBMT application has been studied as a preventive measure (35.71%), treatment and management (50%), and for both the prevention and cure of RD (14.29%)., Conclusion: Overall, PBMT can be considered a reliable and effective treatment modality for reducing the severity of RD. However detailed studies related to the long-term effects of PBMT, its effect on pain intensity and quality of life (QoL) will aid in better assessment of the technique. More clinical trials with a broader sample size could also aid in fine-tuning the efficacy of PBMT treatment modalities., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Radiotherapy (RT), a common cancer treatment, unintentionally harms surrounding tissues, including the skin, and hinders wound healing years after treatment. This study aims to understand the mechanisms behind these late-onset adverse effects. We compare skin biopsies from previously irradiated (RT + ) and non-irradiated (RT - ) sites in breast cancer survivors who underwent RT years ago. Here we show that the RT + skin has compromised healing capacity and fibroblast functions. Using ATAC-seq, we discover altered chromatin landscapes in RT + fibroblasts, with THBS1 identified as a crucial epigenetically primed wound repair-related gene. This is further confirmed by single-cell RNA-sequencing and spatial transcriptomic analysis of human wounds. Notably, fibroblasts in both murine and human post-radiation wound models show heightened and sustained THBS1 expression, impairing fibroblast motility and contractility. Treatment with anti-THBS1 antibodies promotes ex vivo wound closure in RT + skin from breast cancer survivors. Our findings suggest that fibroblasts retain a long-term radiation memory in the form of epigenetic changes. Targeting this maladaptive epigenetic memory could mitigate RT's late-onset adverse effects, improving the quality of life for cancer survivors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: To investigate the effects of Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and curcumin, as a final irrigant on the fracture resistance of irradiated root that obturated with an epoxy resin sealer., Methodology: Eighty mandibular premolars were randomly divided into non-irradiated (NIR) and irradiated (IR) groups. The teeth were irradiated at 2 Gy per fraction, 5 times a week for a total dose of 60 Gy over 6 weeks. All specimens were decoronated, remaining 13±1 mm root length. Two groups were subdivided into four groups (n = 10): 1) non-instrumented; the intact root served as control. The other roots were instrumented with a pro-taper NiTi rotary system. The final irrigation used was 17% EDTA, followed by three irrigation solution groups; 2) 2.5% NaOCl, 3) 0.02% EGCG, and 4) 0.1% curcumin. Root canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH plus. All specimens were embedded in self-curing acrylic resin and loaded vertically at 1 mm/min until fracture occurred. Also, sealer penetration was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The data were evaluated statistically using two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05)., Results: In irradiated roots, fracture resistance of EGCG and curcumin groups did not differ from non-instrumented roots, but they were higher than the NaOCl group (P = 0.006). However, NaOCl, EGCG, and curcumin in irradiated roots had comparable strength that was higher than in the non-instrumented group (p<0.001). Difference between irradiated and non-irradiated roots was observed only for NaOCl and non-instrumented groups (P≤0.004). In irradiated roots, a higher sealer penetration was observed in EGCG and curcumin groups compared to NaOCl., Conclusion: EGCG and curcumin could be promising final irrigants to reverse the adverse effect of radiotherapy on the strength of irradiated roots obturated with AH Plus sealer., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Tavangar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Probiotics are thought to be effective in the treatment of radiation-induced enteropathy (RIE). However, little is known regarding their efficacy in preventing RIE. In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-center study, the incidence of grade 2 acute RIE was compared and the safety of probiotics was evaluated. Patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy for a minimum of 40 Gy at the pelvic level were randomized into two groups: (i) a probiotic group receiving Bacillus licheniformis from two weeks before radiotherapy until the end and (ii) a control group receiving a placebo with the same schedule. The toxicities of 234 patients were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Grade 1 RIE was observed in 65 (56%) of the probiotics group compared with 75 (64%) of the placebo group. Grade 2 RIE occurred in 30 patients (26%) in the probiotics group compared with 26 (22%) in the placebo group, indicating that probiotics failed in their preventive role compared with placebo ( p = 0.493). Medication adherence rates were good, and no difference was observed between the two arms. These findings suggest that B. licheniformis does not significantly prevent RIE.

Radiation-induced skin ulcer following cancer and/or tumour is well-documented in the literature. However, radiation-induced skin ulcer following the excision of keloid is yet to be reported. Here, we report the case of a 33-year-old female patient with a suprapubic skin ulcer of five months' duration following keloid treatment with electron beam therapy at recommended dosage. Various examinations, including a skin biopsy, metagenomic sequencing, magnetic resonance imaging and immunochemistry, indicated that the skin ulcer was induced by radiotherapy. While postoperative radiotherapy has been recommended immediately following keloid excision to reduce the risk of recurrence, the present case highlights the risk of skin refractory ulcer following keloid radiotherapy.

Purpose: Oral mucositis is a frequent adverse reaction in cancer treatment. Probiotics exhibit anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties that could prevent the occurrence of severe oral mucositis (SOM) induced by chemotherapy or radiation therapy in patients. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the influence of probiotics on the incidence of SOM in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from their inception to September 2023. Dichotomous variables are analyzed with odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs, and statistical significance was set at a two-tailed P <0 .05. The primary outcome indicator was the effect of probiotics on SOM. Secondary outcome indicators included the effect of probiotics on oral mucositis and the ratio of diarrhoea. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan (5.4) and Stata 17.0 software., Results: The study included a total of 12 articles and involved 1055 patients. All patients had undergone either radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Our findings revealed that the experimental group, which received probiotics for treatment, exhibited a lower ratio of SOM compared to the control group that received traditional placebo treatment (OR=0.37, 95%CI [0.28, 0.50], P<0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed variations in the ratio of SOM based on therapeutic regimen, tumor type, and region. The overall ratio of oral mucositis was significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group (OR=0.19, 95%CI [0.09-0.39], P<0.01). The ratio of diarrhea in the two patient groups showed no significant difference (OR=0.85, 95%CI [0.24, 3.01], P>0.05)., Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that probiotics could decrease the occurrence of SOM., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Childhood and young adult cancer survivors exposed to chest radiotherapy are at increased risk of lung cancer. In other high-risk populations, lung cancer screening has been recommended. Data is lacking on prevalence of benign and malignant pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities in this population., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities in chest CTs performed more than 5 years post-cancer diagnosis in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. We included survivors exposed to radiotherapy involving the lung field and followed at a high-risk survivorship clinic between November 2005 and May 2016. Treatment exposures and clinical outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Risk factors for chest CT-detected pulmonary nodule were assessed., Results: Five hundred and ninety survivors were included in this analysis: median age at diagnosis, 17.1 years (range, 0.4-39.8); and median time since diagnosis, 22.3 years (range, 1-58.6). At least one chest CT more than 5 years post-diagnosis was performed in 338 survivors (57%). Among these, 193 (57.1%) survivors had at least one pulmonary nodule detected on a total of 1057 chest CTs, resulting in 305 CTs with 448 unique nodules. Follow-up was available for 435 of these nodules; 19 (4.3%) were malignant. Risk factors for first pulmonary nodule were older age at time of CT, CT performed more recently, and splenectomy., Conclusions: Benign pulmonary nodules are very common among long-term survivors of childhood and young adult cancer., Implications for Cancer Survivors: High prevalence of benign pulmonary nodules in cancer survivors exposed to radiotherapy could inform future guidelines on lung cancer screening in this population., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The epidemiology and prognosis of radiation-induced chronic pain, especially chronic neuropathic pain (CNP), are the understudied domain among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors after radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of such chronic pain, and explore its correlations with mental health, sleep disorders, cognitive function, and quality of life (QOL) within these patients. This research encompassed HNC survivors post RT. The determination of radiation-induced chronic pain and CNP adhered to the guidelines outlined by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Multivariable regression analyses were employed to explore the relationship between pain and anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, cognitive function, and QOL. A total of 1,071 HNC survivors post RT were included in this study. The prevalence of radiation-induced chronic pain was 67.1%, and the prevalence of RT-associated CNP was 38.3%. Compared with those reporting no pain, patients with radiation-induced chronic pain had a significantly increased risk of anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders (all P < .001). And there was a significantly negative association between chronic pain and QOL across physiological (P < .001), psychological (P < .001), social relationships (P = .001), and environmental (P = .009) domains. Compared with non-CNP, patients with RT-related CNP had a higher risk of anxiety (P = .027) and sleep disorders (P = .013). The significantly negative associations were found between CNP and the physiological (P = .001), psychological (P = .012), and social score (P = .035) in World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment-Bref. This study underscores the substantial prevalence of chronic pain, particularly CNP, and its potential impact on the mental health, sleep, and QOL among HNC survivors post RT. PERSPECTIVE: This study highlights the high prevalence of radiation-induced chronic pain and CNP, and their potential impacts on anxiety, depression, sleep, and QOL among the HNC survivors. Clinically, these findings have important implications for improving the care and outcomes of HNC survivors., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The evolution of antitumor therapies has significantly improved cancer prognosis but has concurrently resulted in cardiovascular toxicities. Understanding the biological mechanisms behind these toxicities is crucial for effective management. Immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicities are primarily mediated by immune cells and secreted cytokines. Chemotherapy may cause cardiovascular damage through autophagy disruption and mitochondrial dysfunction. Targeted therapies can induce toxicity through endothelin-1 (ET-1) production and cardiac signaling disruption. Radiotherapy may lead to cardiomyopathy and myocardial fibrosis by affecting endothelial cells, triggering inflammatory responses and accelerating atherosclerosis. This review provides insights into these mechanisms and strategies, aiming to enhance the clinical prevention and treatment of cardiovascular toxicities., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease (RACD), a complex disease characterized with pericarditis, myocardial damage, valvular heart diseases, heart failure, vasculopathy and ischemic heart disease, has a generally poor prognosis. While RACD may be acute, it often manifests in the late years or even decades following radiation exposure to the chest. With an increasing number of cancer survivors, RACD is likely to become an important issue in cardio-oncology. This review discusses pre-radiation therapy (RT) preparation, peri-RT patient management and long follow-up planning post-RT from a cardiology perspective. Additionally, a novel technique of stereotactic radiotherapy, which has been applied for the treatment of intractable cardiac arrhythmias, is presented. Appropriate patient examination and management during and after RT are essential to support patients undergoing cancer treatment to improve long life expectancy. A multidisciplinary team is needed to determine how to manage patients who receive RT to reduce RACD, to detect early phases of RACD and to provide the best treatment for RACD. Recent studies increasingly report advances in diagnosis using new equipment that has the potential to detect early phases of RACD, along with growing evidence for the optimal treatment for RACD. This review provides an overview of recent studies and guidelines to report on the latest findings, and to identify unresolved issues surrounding RACD that require validation in future studies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)

Little is known about the aetiology of thymoma. This study aims to identify medical risk factors for thymoma as a systematic approach to new hypotheses on the aetiology of this disease. A European multi-centre case-control study was conducted from 1995 to 1997, including incident cases aged 35-69 years with thymoma. Altogether, we accepted 85 cases and 3350 controls, of which we interviewed 77 cases and 2071 population controls about constitutional factors, medical examinations, and former diseases. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Medical examinations with X-ray or radiotherapy performed >20 times at least one year before the thymoma diagnosis indicated a possible risk factor for thymoma (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.93-2.69). Having the first radiotherapy treatment at least one year before the thymoma diagnosis yielded an OR for thymoma of 2.39; 95% CI (0.96-5.99), and if it was at least five years before, the OR for thymoma was 2.81; 95% CI (1.03-7.72). Having a red/auburn hair colour was associated with thymoma, (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-9.5) whereas having pigmented skin was slightly associated with thymoma (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.8-3.8). Over twenty instances of X-ray examinations or radiotherapy were identified as potential risk factors for thymoma, along with certain constitutional factors. The observed correlations between benign tumours and thymoma could stem from an inherent predisposition to tumour development or result from detection bias. Given that this is the initial analytical study examining medical risk factors for thymoma, all of the results should be approached with caution, acknowledging the possibility that some findings might be incidental.

Oral mucositis is a common and debilitating oral complication in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, resulting in diminished quality of life and potential treatment disruptions. Oral microbiota has long been recognized as a contributing factor in the initiation and progression of radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM). Numerous studies have indicated that the radiation-induced oral microbial dysbiosis promotes the occurrence and severity of oral mucositis. Therefore, approaches that modulate oral microbial ecology are promising for the management of RIOM. Probiotics as a relatively predicable and safe measure that modulates microecology have garnered significant interest. In this review, we discussed the correlation between RIOM and oral microbiota, with a particular focus on the efficacy of probiotics in the control of RIOM, in order to provide novel paradigm for the management of this disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Li, Li, Zheng and Xu.)

Purpose of Review: This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention strategies, and management options for radiation cystitis., Recent Findings: Recent studies have shed light on the pathophysiology of radiation cystitis, highlighting the role of inflammation, fibrosis, and vascular damage. Emerging preventive measures like stem cell therapy offer promise, alongside novel treatments such as amniotic bladder therapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. This review outlines the latest research on radiation cystitis, covering its pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and management. Major findings include insights into the mechanisms of RC development, promising preventive and therapeutic approaches, and the importance of standardized treatment pathways. Future research should focus on identifying genetic risk factors, improving treatment efficacy, and enhancing patient outcomes. This review offers valuable insights for clinicians and researchers, guiding future investigations into radiation cystitis management., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Salivary gland dysfunction is a common side effect of cancer treatments. Salivary function plays key roles in critical daily activities. Consequently, changes in salivary function can profoundly impair quality of life for cancer patients. We discuss salivary gland anatomy and physiology to understand how anticancer therapies such as chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy impair salivary function. We discuss approaches to quantify xerostomia in the clinic, including the advantages and limitations of validated quality-of-life instruments and approaches to directly measuring salivary function. Current and emerging approaches to treat cancer therapy-induced dry mouth are presented using radiation-induced salivary dysfunction as a model. Limitations of current sialagogues and salivary analogues are presented. Emerging approaches, including cellular and gene therapy and novel pharmacologic approaches, are described.

Purpose: The aim of the current scoping review is to identify the studies reporting ototoxicity monitoring in individuals with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiation therapy and/or chemoradiation therapy across the world. The specific objectives were to identify and report the test protocol used, identify the most common timeline of follow-up, and identify barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of the monitoring program., Method: A comprehensive search was conducted across six electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The scoping review method adhered to relevant guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) and frameworks. The database search was carried out by two independent researchers, and studies were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria., Results: This scoping review identified 13 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this study. Only one study reported findings from the perspective of ototoxicity monitoring. Another study explicitly mentioned that ototoxicity monitoring was a standard of care in their hospital. Only one study reported using the relevant guidelines for monitoring ototoxicity. Specialized tests such as high-frequency audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and vestibular tests were rarely used. Ototoxicity monitoring was influenced by awareness-related factors, technical factors, treatment-related factors, and organizational factors., Conclusions: Research on ototoxicity monitoring programs is in its early stages, highlighting the need for standardized practices and multidisciplinary collaboration to enhance health care services for HNC patients. A standardized approach, improved awareness, and the incorporation of patient perspectives are crucial to enhancing ototoxicity monitoring in HNC patients.

The use of chemotherapy and radiation for cancer treatment can result in cutaneous adverse events (AEs) such as toxic erythema of chemotherapy (TEC) and radiation-induced dermatitis. High-dose vitamin D supplementation has been suggested to potentially improve and shorten recovery for these AEs, primarily based on data from case reports and case series. In this article, we discuss the role of vitamin D in the most prevalent cancers (breast and colorectal cancer) and changes in vitamin D levels after chemotherapy or radiation treatments. We also summarize reports on high-dose vitamin D supplementation for treating chemotherapy-induced and radiation-induced skin toxicity. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are essential to clarify the roles of vitamin D in malignancy and in cutaneous AEs associated with cancer treatment. The existing studies we reviewed lack standardized dosing regimens and exhibited heterogeneity across study populations, making it challenging to draw generalizable conclusions.

Competing Interests: We declare no competing interests.

Competing Interests: We declare no competing interests.

Multi-modal therapies for gynecological cancers management may determine a wide range of side effects which depend on therapy-related factors and patient characteristics and comorbidities. Curative or adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy is linked with acute and late toxicity due to irradiation of organs at risk, as small and large bowel, rectum, bladder, pelvic bone, vagina and bone marrow. Successful toxicity management varies with its severity, Radiation Centre practice and experience and skills of radiation oncologists. This position paper was designed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology Gynecology Study Group to provide radiation oncologists with evidence-based strategies to prevent and manage acute and late toxicities and follow-up recommendations for gynecological cancer patients submitted radiotherapy. Six workgroups of radiation oncologists with over 5 years of experience in gynecologic cancers were setup to investigate radiotherapy-related toxicities. For each topic, PubMed database was searched for relevant English language papers from January 2005 to December 2022. Titles and abstracts of results were checked to verify suitability for the document. Reference lists of selected studies and review papers were added if pertinent. Data on incidence, etiopathogenesis, prevention, treatment and follow-up of acute and late side effects for each organ at risk are presented and discussed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The effect of radiation on the ileal pouch is less well studied in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis., Aims: This retrospective study investigates the impact of external radiation therapy on the outcomes of ileal pouches., Methods: The study included 82 patients with IBD and ileal pouches, of whom 12 received pelvic radiation, 16 abdominal radiation, 14 radiation in other fields, and 40 served as controls with no radiation. Pouch-related outcomes, including pouch failure, worsening of symptoms, pouchitis, and development of strictures, along with changes in Pouch Disease Activity Index (PDAI) scores pre- and post-radiation were assessed., Results: The pelvic radiation group exhibited a significantly higher rate of pouch failure (25%, p < 0.004) and worsening pouch-related symptoms (75%, p = 0.012) compared to other groups. Although not statistically significant, a higher incidence of pouchitis was observed in the pelvic radiation group (45.5%, p = 0.071). Strictures were more common in the pelvic radiation group (25%, p = 0.043). Logistic regression analysis revealed that pelvic radiation significantly increased the odds of pouch-related adverse outcomes (OR 5.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.61-21.5)., Conclusion: Pelvic radiation significantly impacts the outcomes of ileal pouches in patients with IBD, increasing the risk of pouch failure, symptom exacerbation, and structural complications. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of radiation therapy in this patient population and highlight the importance of closely monitoring and managing radiation-induced pouch dysfunction., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Radiation-induced skin damage (RID) is the most prevalent, significant side effect of radiotherapy (RT). Nearly 95% of patients experience moderate to severe skin reactions after receiving radiation therapy. However, criteria for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) treatment remain unavailable. Topical agents with anti-inflammatory properties may protect the skin and facilitate tissue regeneration in patients with RID. Many of these topical agents function through nuclear factor kappa B pathway regulation. They either reduce the levels of inflammatory factors or elicit anti-inflammatory properties of their own, thus preventing oxidative stress and inflammatory responses and thus enabling RID prevention and management. Herein, we explore the 25 topical agents investigated for RID prevention and management thus far and evaluate their mechanisms of action. These agents include 11 natural agents, 3 miscellaneous agents, 9 topical nonsteroidal agents, and 2 topical corticosteroids., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Introduction: Financial toxicity is common among patients with cancer, as are co-occurring health-related social risks (HRSRs). There is limited evidence to support best practices in screening for HRSRs and financial toxicity in the cancer context. This analysis sought to understand variations of identified needs based on treatment course using data from a large screening program., Methods: This 2022 to 2023 screening quality improvement program included four services (breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, thoracic) at an urban comprehensive cancer center. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity measured financial toxicity. Patients completed an HRSR checklist documenting food, housing, medication, or transportation insecurity and financial borrowing practices. Differences were evaluated by treatment course (radiation therapy [RT] versus other treatment and RT plus chemotherapy versus other treatment)., Results: Screening surveys were sent to 70,983 unique patients; 38,249 completed a screening survey (54% response rate). Of responders, 4% (n = 1,686) underwent RT in the 120 days before their survey, and 3% (n = 1,033) received RT in combination with chemotherapy. Overall, patients receiving RT had lower unadjusted Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity scores, indicating worse financial toxicity. The proportion of patients receiving RT reporting unmet transportation (15% versus 12%, P < .001) and food (13% versus 11%, P = .02) needs was significantly higher than for patients not receiving RT. More patients receiving RT borrowed money than did patients not receiving RT (17% versus 15%, P = .02). In multivariable models, RT (alone or in combination) was associated with worse financial toxicity and transportation difficulties., Conclusions: Screening for financial toxicity and HRSR is possible at a large cancer center. Patients receiving RT have higher transportation insecurity and worse financial toxicity compared with those receiving other treatments. Tailored intervention throughout the treatment trajectory is essential., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Purpose of Review: This review explores the cardiovascular toxicity associated with cancer therapies, emphasizing the significance of the growing field of cardio-oncology. It aims to elucidate the mechanisms of cardiotoxicity due to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies, and to discuss the advancements in human induced pluripotent stem cell technology (hiPSC) for predictive disease modeling., Recent Findings: Recent studies have identified several chemotherapeutic agents, including anthracyclines and kinase inhibitors, that significantly increase cardiovascular risks. Advances in hiPSC technology have enabled the differentiation of these cells into cardiovascular lineages, facilitating more accurate modeling of drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Moreover, integrating hiPSCs into clinical trials holds promise for personalized cardiotoxicity assessments, potentially enhancing patient-specific therapeutic strategies. Cardio-oncology bridges oncology and cardiology to mitigate the cardiovascular side-effects of cancer treatments. Despite advancements in predictive models using hiPSCs, challenges persist in accurately replicating adult heart tissue and ensuring reproducibility. Ongoing research is essential for developing personalized therapies that balance effective cancer treatment with minimal cardiovascular harm., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Objective: To determine the incidence of radiation cystitis on prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy (RT), evaluating the most used management strategies, and identifying potential risk factors associated with the development of this condition., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver Mariner database, containing patient records compiled between 2011 and 2022. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify population and outcomes. We evaluated patients who underwent RT for PCa and subsequently developed radiation cystitis. Primary objective was to determine the overall incidence of radiation cystitis. Furthermore, we investigated its associated risk factors and management., Results: A total of 274,865 PCa patients underwent RT during the study period. Of these, 48,713 (17.7%) experienced hematuria following RT, while 7721 (2.8%) were diagnosed with radiation cystitis. After the diagnosis, 2307 patients (29.9%) received diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic interventions. Only 59 patients (0.76%) underwent endovascular embolization, while 151 patients (1.95%) required cystectomy. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, administered to 1287 patients (16.67%), was the only treatment that displayed a significant upward trend. Multivariate logistic regression identified obesity (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.23-1.35), smoking (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.22-1.33), and diabetes (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.26-1.39), as significant risk factors for radiation cystitis (all P-values <.001)., Conclusion: Radiation cystitis represents a rare complication after pelvic RT with significant clinical impact. Its incidence has remained stable throughout the study period. The identified risk factors corroborate the pathophysiology of radiation cystitis. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was the only treatment to show an upward trend during the study period., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiation therapy is an important component of cancer treatment scheduled for cancer patients, although it can cause numerous deleterious effects. The use of adjuvant molecules aims to limit the damage in normal surrounding tissues and enhance the effects of radiation therapy, either killing tumor cells or slowing down their growth. Melatonin, an indoleamine released by the pineal gland, behaves as a radiosensitizer in breast cancer, since it enhances the therapeutic effects of ionizing radiation and mitigates side effects on normal cells. However, the molecular mechanisms through which melatonin modulates the molecular changes triggered by radiotherapy remain mostly unknown. Here, we report that melatonin potentiated the anti-proliferative effect of radiation in MCF-7 cells. Treatment with ionizing radiation induced changes in the expression of many genes. Out of a total of 25 genes altered by radiation, melatonin potentiated changes in 13 of them, whereas the effect was reverted in another 10 cases. Among them, melatonin elevated the levels of PTEN and NME1, and decreased the levels of SNAI2, ERBB2, AKT, SERPINE1, SFN, PLAU, ATM and N3RC1. We also analyzed the expression of several microRNAs and found that melatonin enhanced the effect of radiation on the levels of miR-20a, miR-19a, miR-93, miR-20b and miR-29a. Rather surprisingly, radiation induced miR-17, miR-141 and miR-15a but melatonin treatment prior to radiation counteracted this stimulatory effect. Radiation alone enhanced the expression of the cancer suppressor miR-34a, and melatonin strongly stimulated this effect. Melatonin further enhanced the radiation-mediated inhibition of Akt. Finally, in an in vivo assay, melatonin restrained new vascularization in combination with ionizing radiation. Our results confirm that melatonin blocks many of the undesirable effects of ionizing radiation in MCF-7 cells and enhances changes that lead to optimized treatment results. This article highlights the effectiveness of melatonin as both a radiosensitizer and a radioprotector in breast cancer. Melatonin is an effective adjuvant molecule to radiotherapy, promoting anti-cancer therapeutic effects in cancer treatment. Melatonin modulates molecular pathways altered by radiation, and its use in clinic might lead to improved therapeutic outcomes by enhancing the sensitivity of cancerous cells to radiation and, in general, reversing their resistance toward currently applied therapeutic modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose/objective: Currently, there are few prospective data on the tolerability of combining targeted therapies (TT) with radiation therapy (RT). The objective of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility and toxicity of pairing RT with concurrent TT in cancer patients. The aim was to enhance the existing evidence base for the simultaneous administration of targeted substances together with radiotherapy., Methods: Prospective study enrollment was conducted at a single institution between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, for all patients diagnosed with histologically confirmed cancer who underwent external beam radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy. The study, known as the "targeted RT study," was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00026193. Systematic documentation of the toxicity profiles of different targeted therapies was performed, and the assessment of acute toxicity followed the guidelines of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version v5.0., Results: A total of 334 patients underwent 683 radiation therapy series. During the course of RT, 51 different TT substances were concurrently administered. External beam radiotherapy was employed for various anatomical sites. The combination of RT and concurrent TT administration was generally well tolerated, with no instances of severe acute toxicity observed. The most commonly reported toxicity was fatigue, ranging from mild to moderate Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) °I-°III. Other frequently observed toxicities included dermatitis, dyspnea, dysphagia, and dry cough. No toxicity greater than moderate severity was recorded at any point. In only 32 patients (4.7% of evaluated RT series), the concurrent substance administration was discontinued due to side effects. However, these side effects did not exceed mild severity according to CTCAE, suggesting that discontinuation was a precautionary measure. Only one patient receiving Imatinib treatment experienced a severe CTCAE °III side effect, leading to discontinuation of the concurrent substance due to the sudden occurrence of melaena during RT., Conclusion: In conclusion, the current study did not demonstrate a significant increase or additional toxicity when combining radiotherapy and concurrent targeted therapy. However, additional research is required to explore the specific toxicity profiles of the various substances that can be utilized in this context., Trial Registration Number: DRKS00026193. Date of registration 12/27/2022 (retrospectively registered)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Disclosure: There is no conflict of interest or other disclosures.

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial treatment for head and neck cancer however, it causes adverse reactions to the normal tissue and organs adjacent to target tumor. The present study was carried out to investigate possible association of single nucleotide polymorphism in DNA repair genes with toxicity effects of radiotherapy on normal tissue., Methods: Three hundred and fifty head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy treatment were enrolled in this study. The adverse after effects of radiotherapy on the normal tissue in the form of skin reactions were recorded. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of APE1 (rs1130409), hOGG1 (rs1052133) and Rad51 (rs1801320, rs1801321) genes were studied by polymerase chain reaction-Restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and direct DNA sequencing methods and their association with development of severe radio-toxicity effects was evaluated logistic regression analysis., Results: The 172G/T polymorphism of Rad51 was 2.85 times higher and significantly associated with skin reactions (OR=2.85, 95% CI: 1.50-5.41; p=0.001) and severe oral mucositis (OR=4.96, 95% CI: 2.40-10.25; p<0.0001). These results suggested that the polymorphic nature of Rad51 is responsible for risk of radiotherapy adverse effects in HNC patients. The variant 326Cys and heterozygous 326Ser/Cys genotype of hOGG1 was significantly associated with high tumor grade (OR=3.16 95% CI: 1.66-5.99; p=0.0004, and OR=3.97 95% CI: 2.15-7.34; p=<0.0001 respectively). The homozygous variant 172TT genotype of Rad51 showed positive association with poor response of both tumor and nodes towards radiotherapy treatment (p=0.007 and p=0.022)., Conclusions: Interpretation of our results revealed significant association of rs1801321 SNP of Rad51 with development of adverse toxicity reactions in normal tissue of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

The PRO-ACTIVE randomized clinical trial offers 3 swallowing therapies to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients during radiotherapy namely: reactive, proactive low- ("EAT-RT" only), and high-intensity ("EAT-RT + exercises"). Understanding the perceived acceptability of these interventions is important to inform eventual implementation into clinical practice. This study explored patients' perspectives using qualitative methodology. At 2 Canadian PRO-ACTIVE trial sites, 24 trial participants were recruited for individual semi-structured interviews, representing each of the 3 trial arms. Data collection and thematic analysis were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Member checking was conducted through follow-up focus groups. Seven themes were derived reflecting the TFA constructs. Overall, regardless of trial arm, patients reported a positive experience with therapy. Patients identified benefits of EAT-RT therapy, reporting that it provided meaningful feedback on diet progress and supported goal setting for oral intake. Patients who received proactive therapies valued the opportunity to set expectations early, build mealtime routine iteratively over time, and have an extended engagement with the SLP. Regardless of trial arm, patients agreed proactive therapy aligned with what they think is best and that therapy intensity should accommodate individual needs. This study identified the value to HNC patients of receiving swallowing interventions during RT and setting realistic expectations around swallowing. Compared to reactive care, proactive therapies were perceived helpful in consolidating habits early, establishing realistic expectations around swallowing and building an extended rapport with the SLP. These findings will inform the implementation of proactive versus reactive swallowing therapies in clinical practice., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The cancer treatment landscape is significantly evolving, focusing on advanced radiation therapy methods to maximize effectiveness and minimize the adverse effects. Recognized as a pivotal component in cancer and disease treatment, radiation therapy (RT) has drawn attention in recent research that delves into its intricate interplay with inflammation and the immune response. This exploration unveils the underlying processes that significantly influence treatment outcomes. In this context, the potential advantages of combining bronchoscopy with RT across diverse clinical scenarios, alongside the targeted impact of brachytherapy, are explored. Concurrently, radiation treatments serve multifaceted roles such as DNA repair, cell elimination, and generating immune stress signaling molecules known as damage-associated molecular patterns, elucidating their effectiveness in treating various diseases. External beam RT introduces versatility by utilizing particles such as photons, electrons, protons, or carbon ions, each offering distinct advantages. Advanced RT techniques contribute to the evolving landscape, with emerging technologies like FLASH, spatially fractionated RT, and others poised to revolutionize the field. The comprehension of RT, striving for improved treatment outcomes, reduced side effects, and facilitating personalized and innovative treatments for cancer and noncancer patients. After navigating these advancements, the goal is fixed to usher in a new era in which RT is a cornerstone of precision and effectiveness in medical interventions. In summarizing the myriad findings, the review underscores the significance of understanding the differential impacts of radiation approaches on inflammation and immune modulation, offering valuable insights for developing innovative therapeutic interventions that harness the immune system in conjunction with RT., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Advances in cancer therapeutics have improved patient survival rates. However, cancer survivors may suffer from adverse events either at the time of therapy or later in life. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent a clinically important, but mechanistically understudied complication, which interfere with the continuation of best-possible care, induce life-threatening risks, and/or lead to long-term morbidity. These concerns are exacerbated by the fact that targeted therapies and immunotherapies are frequently combined with radiotherapy, which induces durable inflammatory and immunogenic responses, thereby providing a fertile ground for the development of CVDs. Stressed and dying irradiated cells produce 'danger' signals including, but not limited to, major histocompatibility complexes, cell-adhesion molecules, proinflammatory cytokines, and damage-associated molecular patterns. These factors activate intercellular signaling pathways which have potentially detrimental effects on the heart tissue homeostasis. Herein, we present the clinical crosstalk between cancer and heart diseases, describe how it is potentiated by cancer therapies, and highlight the multifactorial nature of the underlying mechanisms. We particularly focus on radiotherapy, as a case known to often induce cardiovascular complications even decades after treatment. We provide evidence that the secretome of irradiated tumors entails factors that exert systemic, remote effects on the cardiac tissue, potentially predisposing it to CVDs. We suggest how diverse disciplines can utilize pertinent state-of-the-art methods in feasible experimental workflows, to shed light on the molecular mechanisms of radiotherapy-related cardiotoxicity at the organismal level and untangle the desirable immunogenic properties of cancer therapies from their detrimental effects on heart tissue. Results of such highly collaborative efforts hold promise to be translated to next-generation regimens that maximize tumor control, minimize cardiovascular complications, and support quality of life in cancer survivors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Before introducing new treatment techniques, an investigation of hazards due to unintentional radiation exposures is a reasonable activity for proactively increasing patient safety. As dedicated software is scarce, we developed a tool for risk assessment to design a quality management program based on best practice methods, i.e., process mapping, failure modes and effects analysis and fault tree analysis. Implemented as a web database application, a single dataset was used to describe the treatment process and its failure modes. The design of the system and dataset allowed failure modes to be represented both visually as fault trees and in a tabular form. Following the commissioning of the software for our department, previously conducted risk assessments were migrated to the new system after being fully re-assessed which revealed a shift in risk priorities. Furthermore, a weighting factor was investigated to bring risk levels of the migrated assessments into perspective. The compensation did not affect high priorities but did re-prioritize in the midrange of the ranking. We conclude that the tool is suitable to conduct multiple risk assessments and concomitantly keep track of the overall quality management activities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The inventors with the Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, and IBA Dosimetry GmbH have a patent pending on some functionality of myQA® PROactive., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Radiation treatment, particularly at a young age, creates theoretical risk for long-term adverse radiation effects, including the development of malignancy. The literature is sparse on radiation-induced vestibular schwannomas (VSs)., Methods: A retrospective review was performed for cases of suspected radiation-induced VS at 2 high-volume centers. Only cases where radiation included coverage of the posterior fossa were included with those diagnosed within 3 years of radiation treatment being excluded. Patient and tumor characteristics were collected. A systematic literature review was also performed for any previously published series on radiation-induced VS., Results: Eight cases of radiation-induced VS were identified with a median follow-up 125 months (range 7-131). The median age at incident radiation was 15 years (range 2-46). The median age at VS diagnosis was 57 years (range 26-83) with median interval from radiation to diagnosis of 51-years (range 15-66). The median tumor size was 6 mm (range 3-21). Two patients underwent surgical resection. Lesions were described as soft and highly vascular, with medium to high adherence to the facial nerve. Five articles with a total of 52 patients were identified, median age at VS diagnosis was 42-years (range 23-73) with a median interval from radiation to diagnosis of 19 years (range 15-23)., Conclusions: The development of VS following radiation exposure appears rare and our understanding of the condition remains incomplete. Further studies are required to determine the best management of these patients and determine whether there is a causative relationship between radiation exposure and the development of VS., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) is a severe chronic complication of radiotherapy (RT) manifested by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) components deposition within the irradiated area. The lung, heart, skin, jaw, pelvic organs and so on may be affected by RIF, which hampers body functions and quality of life. There is accumulating evidence suggesting that the immune microenvironment may play a key regulatory role in RIF. This article discussed the synergetic or antagonistic effects of immune cells and mediators in regulating RIF's development. Several potential preventative and therapeutic strategies for RIF were proposed based on the immunological mechanisms to provide clinicians with improved cognition and clinical treatment guidance., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)