Search

The November 2013 online publication of ARUBA, the first multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), has sparked over 100 publications in protracted debates METHODS: This study sought to examine inpatient management patterns of brain AVMs from 2009 to 2016 and observe if changes in U.S. inpatient management were attributable to the ARUBA publication using interrupted time series of brain AVM studies from the National Inpatient Sample data 2009-2016. Outcomes of interest were use of embolization, surgery, combined embolization and microsurgery, radiotherapy, and observation during that admission. An interrupted time series design compared management trends before and after ARUBA. Segmented linear regression analysis tested for immediate and long-term impacts of ARUBA on management. RESULTS: Elective and asymptomatic patient admissions declined 2009-2016. In keeping with the ARUBA findings, observation for unruptured brain AVMs increased and microsurgery decreased. However, embolization, radiosurgery, and combined embolization and microsurgery also increased. For ruptured brain AVMs, treatment modality trends remained positive with even greater rates of observation, embolization, and combined embolization and microsurgery occurring after ARUBA (data on radiosurgery were scarce). None of the estimates for the change in trends were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The publication of ARUBA was associated with a decrease in microsurgery and increase in observation for unruptured brain AVMs in the US. However, inpatient radiotherapy, embolization, and combined embolization and surgery also increased, suggesting trends moved counter to ARUBA's conclusions. This analysis suggested that ARUBA had a small impact as clinicians rejected ARUBA's findings in managing unruptured brain AVMs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The work presented in this manuscript was conducted while HV was at Brigham and Women’s Hospital., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Essential tremor (ET) is the most frequent movement disorder, affecting up to 5% of adults > 65 years old. In 30-50% of cases, optimal medical management provides insufficient tremor relief and surgical options are considered. Thalamotomy is a time-honored intervention, which can be performed using radiofrequency (RF), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasounds (MRgFUS). While the latter has received considerable attention in the last decade, SRS has consistently been demonstrated as an effective and well-tolerated option., Areas Covered: This review discusses the evidence on SRS thalamotomy for ET. Modern workflows and emerging techniques are detailed. Current outcomes are analyzed, with a specific focus on tremor reduction, complications and radiological evolution of the lesions. Challenges for the field are highlighted., Expert Opinion: SRS thalamotomy improves tremor in > 80% patients. The efficacy appears comparable to other modalities, including DBS, RF and MRgFUS. Side effects result mostly from idiosyncratic hyper-responses to radiation, which occur in up to 10% of treatments, are usually self-resolving, and are symptomatic in < 4% of patients. Future research should focus on accumulating more data on bilateral treatments, collecting long-term outcomes, refining targeting, and improving lesion consistency.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a treatment option for recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The current and future role of STAR as viewed by cardiologists is unknown. The study aimed to assess the current role, barriers to application, and expected future role of STAR. An online survey consisting of 20 questions on baseline demographics, awareness/access, current use, and the future role of STAR was conducted. A total of 129 international participants completed the survey [mean age 43 ± 11 years, 25 (16.4%) female]. Ninety-one (59.9%) participants were electrophysiologists. Nine participants (7%) were unaware of STAR as a therapeutic option. Sixty-four (49.6%) had access to STAR, while 62 (48.1%) had treated/referred a patient for treatment. Common primary indications for STAR were recurrent VT/VF in SHD (45%), recurrent VT/VF without SHD (7.8%), or premature ventricular contraction (3.9%). Reported main advantages of STAR were efficacy in the treatment of arrhythmias not amenable to conventional treatment (49%) and non-invasive treatment approach with overall low expected acute and short-term procedural risk (23%). Most respondents have foreseen a future clinical role of STAR in the treatment of VT/VF with or without underlying SHD (72% and 75%, respectively), although only a minority expected a first-line indication for it (7% and 5%, respectively). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation as a novel treatment option of recurrent VT appears to gain acceptance within the cardiology community. Further trials are critical to further define efficacy, patient populations, as well as the appropriate clinical use for the treatment of VT., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B.K., H.I.L., and J.C. have nothing to declare. D.D. received modest lecture honorary, travel grants, and/or a fellowship grant from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVRx, Medtronic, MicroPort, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Zoll. M.M. reports receiving speaker fees from Abbott, Bayer, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Amomed, AOP Orphan, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, and BMS/Pfizer and research grants from Biosense Webster and Abbott. A.M.S. received educational grants through his institution from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, BMS/Pfizer, and Medtronic and speaker/advisory board/consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare, Biotronik, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, BMS/Pfizer, StrideBio Inc., and Zoll. P.F. reports patent applications related to bipolar and high-voltage ablation and has equity in CorSystem., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

The landscape of the cranial neurosurgery has changed tremendously in past couple of decades. The main frontiers including introduction of neuro-endoscopy, minimally invasive skull base approaches, SRS, laser interstitial thermal therapy and use of tubular retractors have revolutionized the management of intracerebral hemorrhages, deep seated tumors other intracranial pathologies. Introduction of these novel techniques is based on smaller incisions with maximal operative corridors, decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stays, decreased post-operative pain and cosmetically appealing scars that improves patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. The sophisticated tools like neuroendoscopy have improved light source, and better visualization around the corners. Advanced navigated tools and channel-based retractors help us to target deeply seated lesions with increased precision and minimal disruption of the surrounding neurovascular tissues. Advent of stereotactic radiosurgery has provided us alternative feasible, safe and effective options for treatment of patients who are otherwise not medically stable to undergo complex cranial surgical interventions. This paper review advances in treatment of intracranial pathologies, and how the neurosurgeons and other medical providers at the University of Missouri-Columbia (UMC) are optimizing these treatments for their patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure: No financial disclosures reported. Artificial intelligence was not used in the study, research, preparation, or writing of this manuscript., (Copyright 2024 by the Missouri State Medical Association.)

Objective: The optimal management of intraventricular metastases remains debatable. The aim of this study is to define the safety and efficacy of Gamma-Knife radiosurgery in the treatment of intraventricular metastases., Methods: This retrospective, single-center study involved patients that were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intraventricular metastases. The study end points included SRS-related toxicity, local and distal intracranial tumor control, as well as the incidence of post-treatment hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination. Factors associated with radiologic and clinical outcomes were also analyzed., Results: The cohort included 17 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of 41 intracranial metastases, of which 23 were primary intraventricular (intraventricular metastasis). Median overall survival from primary tumor diagnosis and from SRS treatment were 28 and 5 months, respectively. With a median radiological follow-up of 3 (interquartile range 3) months, 7 patients (41.18%) experienced overall intracranial disease progression, whereas 7 (27.27%) intraventricular metastases progressed radiologically. Four (23.53%) and 3 (17.65%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Four patients (23.53%) died due to intracranial disease progression., Conclusions: SRS offers a reasonable chance of local tumor control for patients with intraventricular brain metastasis. However, the risk of hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal spread of disease is not inconsequential and merits close follow-up for patients with brain metastasis involving the ventricular system., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Given its minimally invasive nature and effectiveness, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a mainstay for the multimodal treatment of intracranial neoplasm. However, no studies have evaluated recent trends in the use of SRS versus those of open resection for the management of brain tumor or trends in the involvement of neurosurgeons in SRS (which is primarily delivered by radiation oncologists). Here, the authors used publicly available Medicare data from 2009 to 2018 to elucidate trends in the treatment of intracranial neoplasm and to compare reimbursements between these approaches., Methods: By using CPT Professional 2019, the authors identified 10 open resection and 9 SRS codes (4 for neurosurgery and 5 for radiation oncology) for the treatment of intracranial neoplasm. Medicare payments (inflation adjusted) and allowed services (number of reimbursed procedures) for each code were abstracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part B National Summary Data File (2009-2018). Payments per procedure and procedures per 100,000 Medicare enrollees were analyzed with linear regression and compared with tests for equality of slopes (α = 0.05). The average payment per procedure over the study period was compared by using the 2-tailed Welsh unequal variances t-test, and more granular comparisons were conducted by using ANOVA with post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests., Results: From 2009 to 2018, the number of SRS treatments per 100,000 Medicare enrollees for intracranial neoplasm increased by 3.97 cases/year (R2 = 0.99, p < 0.001), while comparable open resections decreased by 0.34 cases/year (R2 = 0.85, p < 0.001) (t16 = 7.5, p < 0.001). By 2018, 2.6 times more SRS treatments were performed per 100,000 enrollees than open resections (74.9 vs 28.7 procedures). However, neurosurgeon involvement in SRS treatment declined over the study period, from 23.4% to 11.5% of SRS treatments; simultaneously, the number of lesions treated per session increased from 1.46 to 1.84 (R2 = 0.98, p < 0.001). Overall, physician payments from 2013 to 2018 averaged $1816.08 (95% CI $1788.71-$1843.44) per SRS treatment and $1565.59 (95% CI $1535.83-$1595.34) per open resection (t10 = 15.9, p < 0.001). For neurosurgeons specifically, reimbursements averaged $1566 per open resection, but this decreased to $1031-$1198 per SRS session; comparatively, radiation oncologists were reimbursed even less (average $359-$898) per SRS session (p < 0.05 according to the Tukey HSD test for all comparisons)., Conclusions: Over a decade, the number of open resections for intracranial neoplasm in Medicare enrollees declined slightly, while the number of SRS procedures increased greatly. This latter expansion is largely attributable to radiation oncologists; meanwhile, neurosurgeons have shifted their involvement in SRS toward sessions for the management of multiple lesions.

Background: This study was to assess the rate of radiotherapy (RT) utilization according to the modality in South Korea to identify the implications of contemporary RT patterns., Methods: We collected information from claims and reimbursement records of the National Health Insurance Service from 2010 to 2019. We classified the location of each institution as capital (Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi-do) and non-capital areas., Results: The rate of RT utilization in total cancer patients nationwide was 24.5% in 2010, which consistently has increased to 36.1% in 2019 (annual increase estimate [AIE], 4.5%). There was an abrupt increase in patients receiving intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), with an AIE of 33.5%, and a steady decline in patients receiving three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT), with an AIE of -7.1%. The commonest RT modality was IMRT (44.5%), followed by 3DCRT and stereotactic RT (SRT) (37.2% and 13.5%) in 2019. An increasing trend of advanced RT (such as IMRT and SRT) utilization was observed regardless of the region, although the AIE in the capital areas was slightly higher than that in non-capital areas., Conclusion: The utilization of overall RT application and especially of advanced modalities remarkably increased from 2010 to 2019. We also found gaps in their AIEs between capital and non-capital areas. We should ensure that advanced RT is accessible to all cancer patients across South Korea., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2021 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for lactotroph adenomas (LAs) or prolactinomas is limited due to the effectiveness of medical treatments and surgery. Cases who are refractory to medical treatment and/or surgery may be managed with GKRS. We aimed to describe the effectiveness of GKRS for high-risk lactotroph adenomas (HRLAs) and LAs that were medically and surgically refractory. We analyzed our series of patients with HRLAs and LAs who were managed with GKRS following failed medical treatment and surgery and who had at least three years of follow-up. A total of 52 patients (22 HRLAs and 30 LAs) were included in the analysis of radiological, endocrine, and clinical outcomes. Radiological control was achieved in 68.2% of subjects in the HRLA group and 96.7% of subjects in the LA group. Hormonal control was achieved in 68.2% of patients in the HRLA group and 80% of patients in the LA group. On univariate analysis, hormonal control was significantly associated with pre-treatment volume (p = 0.007), higher margin dose (p = 0.002) and Ki-67 proliferative index (p = 0.007). Complications involved new pituitary hormone deficiencies in 19.2% of patients and asymptomatic peripheral visual field defect in 1.9% of patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effectiveness of GKRS in LAs and HRLAs, with the highest median follow-up in the literature. High hormonal control rate, even in HRLAs, and lower complication rates suggest that GKRS should be part of the techniques for managing treatment refractory LAs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Hypothalamic hamartomas are aberrant masses, composed of abnormally distributed neurons and glia. Along endocrine and cognitive symptoms, they may cause epileptic seizures, including the specific gelastic and dacrystic seizures. Surgery is the treatment of drug-resistant hamartoma epilepsy, with associated positive results on endocrine, psychiatric, and cognitive symptoms. Recently, alternatives to open microsurgical treatment have been proposed. We review these techniques and compare their efficacy and safety. Open resection or disconnection of the hamartoma, either through pterional, transcallosal, or transventricular approach, leads to good epileptological control, but its high complication rate, up to 30%, limits its indications. The purely cisternal peduncular forms remain the only indication of open, pterional approach, while other strategies have been developed to overcome the neurological, endocrine, behavioral, or cognitive complications. Laser and radiofrequency thermocoagulation-based disconnection through robot-guided stereo-endoscopy has been proposed as an alternative to open microsurgical resection and stereotactic destruction. The goal is to allow safe and complete disconnection of a possibly complex attachment zone, through a single intraparenchymal trajectory which allows multiple laser or radiofrequency probe trajectory inside the ventricle. The efficacy was high, with 78% of favorable outcome, and the overall complication rate was 8%. It was especially effective in patients with isolated gelastic seizures and pure intraventricular hamartomas. Stereotactic radiosurgery has proved as efficacious and safer than open microsurgery, with around 60% of seizure control and a very low complication rate. Multiple stereotactic thermocoagulation showed very interesting results with 71% of seizure freedom and 2% of permanent complications. Stereotactic laser interstitial thermotherapy (LiTT) seems as effective as open microsurgery (from 76 to 81% of seizure freedom) but causes up to 20% of permanent complications. This technique has however been highly improved by targeting only the epileptogenic onset zone in the hamartoma, as shown on preoperative functional MRI, leading to an improvement of epilepsy control by 45% (92% of seizure freedom) with no postoperative morbidity. All these results suggest that the impact of the surgical procedure does not depend on purely technical matters (laser vs radiofrequency thermocoagulation or stereotactic vs robot-guided stereo-endoscopy) but relies on the understanding of the epileptic network, including inside the hamartoma, the aim being to plan an effective disconnection or lesion of the epileptogenic part while sparing the adjacent functional structures.

Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) are rare, usually benign hyper vascularized neuroendocrine tumors that traditionally have been treated by surgery, with or without endovascular embolization, or, more recently stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of our study is to determine the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of SRS for treatment of HNPs. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed, and 37 articles reporting 11,174 patients (1144 tumors) with glomus jugulare (GJT: 993, 86.9%), glomus tympanicum (GTT: 94, 8.2%), carotid body tumors (CBTs: 28, 2.4%), and glomus vagale (GVT: 16, 1.4%) treated with SRS definitively or adjuvantly were included. The local control (LC) was estimated from the pooled analysis of the series, and its association with SRS technique as well as demographic and clinical factors was analyzed. The median age was 56 years (44-69 years). With a median clinical and radiological follow-up of 44 months (9-161 months), LC was 94.2%. Majority of the patients (61.0%) underwent Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKS), but there was no statistically significant difference in LC depending upon the SRS technique (p = 0.9). Spearmen's correlation showed that LC was strongly and negatively correlated with multiple parameters, which included female gender (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001), right-sided tumor (r = - 0.3, p = 0.03), primary SRS (r = - 0.5, p ≤ 0.001), and initial clinical presentation of hearing loss (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001). To achieve a LC ≥ 90%, a median marginal dose (Gy) of 15 (range, 12-30 Gy) was required. The results corroborate that SRS in HNPs is associated with good clinical and radiological outcome.

Background: Hypopituitarism is the most frequent complication after pituitary adenoma stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and is correlated with increasing radiation to the pituitary gland. Biological effective dose (BED) is a dosimetric parameter that incorporates a time component to adjust for mechanisms of deoxyribonucleic acid repair activated during treatment., Objective: To assess mean gland BED as a predictor of post-SRS hypopituitarism, as compared to mean gland dose, in a contemporary cohort study of patients undergoing single-fraction SRS for pituitary adenoma., Methods: Cohort study of 97 patients undergoing single-fraction SRS from 2007 to 2014. Eligible patients had no prior pituitary irradiation, normal pre-SRS endocrine function, and >24 mo of endocrine follow-up. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess mean gland dose and BED as predictors of new post-SRS hypopituitarism., Results: Median post-SRS follow-up was 48 mo (interquartile range [IQR], 34-68). A total of 27 patients (28%) developed new hypopituitarism at a median 22 mo (IQR, 12-36). Actuarial rates of new endocrinopathy were 17% at 2 yr (95% CI 10%-25%) and 31% at 5 yr (95% CI 20%-42%). On univariate analysis, sex (P = .02), gland volume (P = .03), mean gland dose (P < .0001), and BED significantly predicted new hypopituitarism (P < .0001). After adjusting for sex and gland volume, BED > 45 Gy2.47 and mean gland dose > 10 Gy were significantly associated increased risk of hypopituitarism (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.32, 95% CI = 4.26-89.0, P < .0001; HR = 11.91, 95% CI = 3.54-74.0, P < .0001)., Conclusion: BED predicted hypopituitarism more reliably than mean gland dose after pituitary adenoma SRS, but additional studies are needed to confirm these results., (© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.)

Purpose: Guidelines recommend short-course (≤10 fractions) external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for bone metastases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may also improve outcomes; however, routine use is not recommended outside clinical trials. We assessed national radiation therapy trends in complex techniques for bone metastases and associated expenditures., Methods and Materials: Using a claims-based Medicare data set covering 84% of beneficiaries, we assessed the relative proportion of all radiation episodes represented by bone metastases. We then evaluated use of short-course and long-course (>10 fractions) EBRT, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and SBRT for bone metastases in hospital-affiliated outpatient (OPD) or freestanding (FREE) facilities. We assessed differences using χ 2 d or Wilcoxon rank sum tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. We identified associations with modality, fractionation, and expenditures using multivariable logistic/linear regression., Results: Among 467,781 radiation episodes for 17 cancer diagnoses, the overall proportion of episodes dedicated to bone metastases (9.4%) was stable from 2015 to 2017, although treatments were increasing in the hospital-affiliated outpatient setting (P < .005). We identified 40,993 episodes for bone metastases, of which 63% were short-course EBRT, 24% were long-course EBRT, 7% were SBRT, and 6% were IMRT. Techniques more common in the hospital-affiliated outpatient setting included short-course EBRT (OPD, 69%, vs FREE, 56%) and SBRT (OPD, 9%, vs FREE, 5%). Techniques more common among free-standing centers included long-course EBRT (OPD, 19%, vs FREE, 31%) and IMRT (OPD, 4%, vs FREE, 9%). From 2015 to 2017, long-course EBRT decreased by an absolute 8%; short-course EBRT, SBRT, and IMRT increased by 4%, 2.5%, and 1%, respectively. The SBRT/IMRT uptake did not differ by setting (P = .4). Differences in expenditures between SBRT and short-course EBRT decreased by a relative 8% in professional and 12% in technical fees., Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 4 patients received long-course EBRT, with small reductions in use largely replaced by complex treatment modalities. However, expenditures for complex modalities also decreased over time. As alternative payment models take effect, quality metrics are needed to ensure appropriate, effective, and safe delivery of complex technologies., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose/objective: About 20% of children with solid tumours (ST) present with distant metastases (DM). Evidence regarding the use of radical radiotherapy of these DM is sparse and open for personal interpretation. The aim of this survey was to review European protocols and to map current practice regarding the irradiation of DM across SIOPE-affiliated countries., Materials/methods: Radiotherapy guidelines for metastatic sites (bone, brain, distant lymph nodes, lung and liver) in eight European protocols for rhabdomyosarcoma, non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma and renal tumours were reviewed. SIOPE centres irradiating ≥50 children annually were invited to participate in an online survey., Results: Radiotherapy to at least one metastatic site was recommended in all protocols, except for high-risk neuroblastoma. Per protocol, dose prescription varied per site, and information on delineation and treatment planning/delivery was generally missing. Between July and September 2019, 20/27 centres completed the survey. Around 14% of patients were deemed to have DM from ST at diagnosis, of which half were treated with curative intent. A clear cut-off for a maximum number of DM was not used in half of the centres. Regardless of the tumour type and site, conventional radiotherapy regimens were most commonly used to treat DM. When stereotactic radiotherapy was used, a wide range of fractionation regimens were applied., Conclusion: Current radiotherapy guidelines for DM do not allow a consistent approach in a multicentre setting. Prospective (randomised) trials are needed to define the role of radical irradiation of DM from paediatric ST., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement None declared., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was born in an attempt to treat complex intracranial pathologies in a fashion whereby open surgery would create unnecessary or excessive risk. To create this innovation, it was necessary to harness advances in other fields such as engineering, physics, radiology, and computer science., Methods: We review the history of SRS to provide context to today's current state, as well as guide future advancement in the field., Results: Since time of Lars Leksell, the young Swedish neurosurgeon who pioneered the development of the SRS, the collegial and essential partnership between neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and physicists has given rise to radiosurgery as a prominent and successful tool in neurosurgical practice., Conclusion: We examine how neurosurgeons have helped foster the SRS evolution and how this evolution has impacted neurosurgical practice as well as that of radiation oncology and neuro-oncology.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between primary GKS and postoperative GKS for acromegaly, and to elucidate predictors associated with endocrine remission, we performed a monocenter, retrospective study., Method: Seventy-five patients with acromegaly who had received GKS in West China Hospital between March 2010 and December 2018 were included in this study. Endocrine remission was defined as age-sex matched IGF-I normalization and either nadir level of GH <1 ng/mL after OGTT or the random GH < 2.0 ng/mL., Results: We didn't find significant differences in endocrine remission, biochemical recurrence, imaging regression, imaging progression, radiation-induced complications between the primary GKS group and the postoperative GKS group(P > 0.05). Actuarial rates of durable endocrine remission at 3, 5, 8 year were 10.60 %, 33.80 % and 70.60 % in the primary GKS group and 6.70 %, 43.40 % and 78.80 % in the postoperative GKS group(P = 0.800). Only base nadir GH after OGTT (HR = 0.637,95 % CI:0.416-0.977; P = 0.039) was found to be a predictor of duration endocrine remission., Conclusion: We find comparable efficacy and safety between primary GKS and postoperative GKS. Lower base nadir GH after OGTT was a positive predictor associated with endocrine remission. GKS should be considered for residual or recurrent tumor after surgery. For those who couldn't sustain surgery, GKS is an alternative treatment. Further studies are required to elucidate the efficacy and safety of GKS in acromegaly., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) secondary to tumors is encountered in up to 6% of patients with facial pain syndromes and is considered to be associated with tumors affecting the trigeminal nerve pathways. The most frequent are meningiomas and vestibular schwannomas (VS). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a valuable treatment, with heterogeneity of clinical results. We sought to review the medical literature on TN treated with SRS for meningiomas and VS and investigate the rates of improvement of TN symptoms., Methods: We reviewed articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 in PubMed. Pain relief after SRS, the maintenance of pain relief, and TN recurrence and complications were evaluated with separate meta-analyses, taking into account the data on individual patients., Results: Pain relief after SRS was reported as Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scores of BNI I in 50.5% (range 36-65.1%) of patients and BNI I-IIIb in 83.8% (range 77.8-89.8%). There was no significant difference in series discussing outcomes for tumor targeting versus tumor and nerve targeting. Recurrences were described in 34.7% (range 21.7-47.6; tumor targeting). Maintenance of BNI I was reported in 36.4% (range 20.1-52.7) and BNI I-IIIb in 41.2% (range 29.8-52.7; tumor targeting series). When both the nerve and the tumor were targeted, only 1 series reported 86.7% with BNI I-IIIb at last follow-up. Complications were encountered in 12.6% (range 6.3-18.8; tumor targeting series) of patients; however, they were much higher, as high as 26.7%, in the only study reporting them after targeting both the nerve and the tumor. The most common complication was facial numbness., Conclusion: SRS for TNB secondary to benign tumors, such as meningiomas and VS, is associated with favorable clinical course, but less favorable than in idiopathic TN. There was, however, heterogeneity among reports and targeting approaches. Although targeting both the nerve and the tumor seemed to achieve better long-term results, the rate of complications was much higher and the number of patients treated was limited. Future clinical studies should focus on the standard reporting of clinical outcomes and randomization of targeting methods., (© 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the standard surgical procedure for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has gained increasing popularity as a less invasive technique. We report our institution's outcome in the surgical treatment of TN (MVD vs. SRS), taking patient's age and gender into consideration., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing MVD or SRS for type 1 idiopathic TN between 2004 and 2019 at the University of Iowa. Standardized data collection focused on preoperative clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes including the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Pain Intensity Score., Results: A total of 111 patients underwent MVD and 103 patients underwent SRS for TN. Patients were younger in the MVD (median, 60 years) than SRS (median, 72 years) group. More females (58%) than males (42%) had TN. Multivariate ordinal regression analysis showed that an outcome of BNI score I-II (P = 0.365) and III (P = 0.736) can be achieved with either MVD or SRS; however, BNI score IV (P = 0.031) and V (P = 0.022) were more associated with SRS. Six percent of patients in the MVD group and 26% in the SRS group developed pain recurrence and required a second operation. Nine of 10 patients who underwent MVD after failed SRS had complete pain relief., Conclusions: Factoring in patients' age and gender, both MVD and SRS can achieve a favorable outcome for medically refractory TN, although BNI scores of IV and V were more common with SRS., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The incidence of brain metastases has markedly increased in the past 20 years owing to progress in the treatment of malignant solid tumours, earlier diagnosis by MRI and an ageing population. Although local therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for many patients with brain metastases, a growing number of systemic options are now available and/or are under active investigation. HER2-targeted therapies (lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine), alone or in combination, yield a number of intracranial responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. New inhibitors are being investigated in brain metastases from ER-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Several generations of EGFR and ALK inhibitors have shown activity on brain metastases from EGFR and ALK mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold promise in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without druggable mutations and in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The survival of patients with brain metastases from melanoma has substantially improved after the advent of BRAF inhibitors and ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The combination of targeted agents or ICIs with stereotactic radiosurgery could further improve the response rates and survival but the risk of radiation necrosis should be monitored. Advanced neuroimaging and liquid biopsy will hopefully improve response evaluation.

Objective: Intraventricular metastatic brain tumors account for a small, but challenging, fraction of metastatic brain tumors (0.9%-4.5%). Metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) account for a large portion of these intraventricular tumors. Although patient outcomes have been assumed to be poor, these have not been reported in a modern series with a multimodality treatment paradigm of radiotherapy (RT), resection, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. We have presented the first case series of patients with intraventricular metastatic tumors from RCC., Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients with intraventricular RCC metastases treated from January 2003 to January 2019. Volumetric analysis was used to delineate the tumor size and the Kaplan-Meier method to evaluate the survival data., Results: A total of 22 intraventricular RCC metastases were identified in 19 patients with 61.3 patient-years of follow-up. The median patient age was 64 years, and the median tumor volume was 2.2 cm 3 . Overall, 19 metastases had been treated initially with RT. Of these, 16 had received stereotactic body RT and 3 had received whole brain RT. Three tumors were surgically excised and had received adjuvant stereotactic body RT in the upfront setting. Although 5 patients had presented with obstructive hydrocephalus, none had required CSF diversion. After treatment, 5 metastases had progressed, resulting in 1- and 3-year progression-free survival rates of 81.6% and 68%, respectively. The median overall survival was 2.8 years, with 1- and 5-year overall survival rates of 76.7% and 28.3%, respectively. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis was not observed., Conclusions: Despite the relatively limited overall survival for this population with metastatic cancer, comparable to contemporary parenchymal brain metastasis cohorts, reasonable local central nervous system control was achieved in most patients using a paradigm of focal RT and resection, where indicated. Finally, CSF diversion was not required even in patients presenting with hydrocephalus., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Quality of life (QOL) is an important endpoint measure of cancer treatment. The authors' goal was to evaluate QOL trajectories and prognostic value in cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases., Methods: Patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between January 2016 and November 2019 were prospectively evaluated for QOL using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire before SRS and at follow-up visits. Only patients who had pre-SRS and at least 1 post-SRS QOL assessment were considered., Results: Fifty-four cancer patients underwent 109 GKRS procedures. The first post-SRS visit was at a median of 2.59 months (range 0.13-21.08 months), and the last post-SRS visit was at 14.72 months (range 2.52-45.21 months) after SRS. There was no statistically significant change in the EQ-5D index score (p = 0.539) at the first compared with last post-SRS visit. The proportion of patients reporting some problems on the EQ-5D dimension of self-care increased during the course of follow-up from 9% (pre-SRS visit) to 18% (last post-SRS visit; p = 0.03). The proportion of patients reporting problems on the EQ-5D dimensions of mobility, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression remained stable during the course of follow-up (p ≥ 0.106). After adjusting for clinical variables, a higher recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class (i.e., worse prognostic category) was independently associated with greater odds for EQ-5D index score deterioration (p = 0.050). Upfront whole-brain radiation therapy predicted deterioration of the EQ-5D self-care (p = 0.03) and usual activities (p = 0.024) dimensions, while a greater number of lesions predicted deterioration of the EQ-5D anxiety/depression dimension (p = 0.008). A lower pre-SRS EQ-5D index was associated with shorter survival independently from clinical and demographic variables (OR 18.956, 95% CI 2.793-128.64; p = 0.003)., Conclusions: QOL is largely preserved in brain metastasis patients treated with SRS. Higher RPA class, upfront whole-brain radiation therapy, and greater intracranial disease burden are independent predictors of post-SRS QOL deterioration. Worse pre-SRS QOL predicts shorter survival. Assessment of QOL is recommended in brain metastasis patients managed with SRS.

Lung cancer prevention may include primary prevention strategies, such as corrections of working conditions and life style - primarily smoking cessation - as well as secondary prevention strategies, aiming at early detection that allows better survival rates and limited resections. This review summarizes recent developments and advances in secondary prevention, focusing on recent technological tools for an effective early diagnosis.

The approach to treating vestibular schwannomas ranges from wait-and-scan policies to micro-and radiosurgery. However, in the past few decades, Stereotac tic Radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an approved primary treatment option as well. In this review, we have assessed some of the existing literature on the role of SRS in the management of vestibular schwannomas, and to estimate its efficacy in tumour control and conservation of cranial nerve function.

Purpose: To assess use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and compare outcomes with thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy (PN)., Materials and Methods: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was investigated for histopathologically proven stage I RCC treated with PN, cryoablation, radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) ablation, or SBRT. Patients were propensity score-matched to account for potential confounders, including patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, tumor size, histology, grade, tumor sequence, administration of systemic therapy, treatment in academic vs nonacademic centers, treatment location, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models., Results: A total of 91,965 patients were identified (SBRT, n = 174; PN, n = 82,913; cryoablation, n = 5,446; RF/MW ablation, n = 3,432). Stage I patients who received SBRT tended to be older women with few comorbidities treated at nonacademic centers in New England states. After propensity score matching, a cohort of 636 patients was obtained with well-balanced confounders between treatment groups. In the matched cohort, OS after SBRT was inferior to OS after PN and thermal ablation (PN vs SBRT, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.46, P < .001; cryoablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.60, P < .001; RF/MW ablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.67, P < .001). Compared with PN, neither cryoablation nor RF/MW ablation showed significant difference in OS (cryoablation vs PN, HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.80-2.28, P = .258; RF/MW ablation vs PN, HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.95-2.55, P = .079)., Conclusions: Current SBRT protocols show lower OS compared with thermal ablation and PN, whereas thermal ablation and PN demonstrate comparable outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive technique that enables to create brain focal lesions with a high precision and localization. Thus, functional brain disorders can be treated by SRS in case of pharmacoresistance or inoperability. To date, treatment of trigeminal neuralgia is the most described and known indication. Other indications will be developed in the future like movement disorders, refractory epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disorder and severe depression. We present here a review of actual and future indications of functional brain SRS with their level of evidence. All these SRS treatments have to be strictly conducted by trained teams with an excellent collaboration between radiation physicists, medical physicists, neurosurgeons, neurologists, psychiatrists and probably neuroradiologists., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is still controversially discussed., Objective: To present long-term follow-up data on patients after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebral AVMs., Methods: Overall, 516 patients received radiosurgery for cerebral AVMs between 1992 and 2018 at our department, of whom 265 received radiosurgery alone and 207 were treated with a combined endovascular-radiosurgical approach. Moreover, 45 patients were treated with a volume-staged approach. Two eras were analyzed, the pre-modern era between 1992 and 2002 and the modern era thereafter., Results: In GKRS-only treated patients, median time to nidus occlusion was 3.8 years. Spetzler-Ponce (SP) class was a significant predictor for time to obliteration in the whole sample. Median time to obliteration for the combined treatment group was 6.5 years. Patients in the pre-modern era had a significantly higher obliteration rate than those treated in the modern era. Overall, the calculated yearly hemorrhage risk in the observation period after first GKRS was 1.3%. Permanent post-radiosurgical complications occurred in 4.9% of cases but did not differ between the treatment groups or treatment eras. The obliteration rate was significantly lower and the hemorrhage rate was higher in volume-staged treated patients than in conventionally treated patients., Conclusion: GKRS is an effective treatment option for SP class A and B cerebral AVMs. After combined endovascular-radiosurgical treatment, the outcome of selected SP class C AVMs aligns with that of SP class B lesions. Both the combined therapy and radiosurgery alone constitute sound methods for treatment of cerebral AVMs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The use of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for meningiomas after cranial surgery has been extensively evaluated; however, studies on tumor progression, including recurrence out of the margin dose line, are scarce. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the meningioma recurrence after GKS within and out of the margin dose. We included 37 consecutive patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 meningiomas who were treated with GKS following cranial surgery. Radiologically indicated recurrences were classified into three patterns by their relationship to the margin dose and tumor. The median follow-up was 58.9 months; 2 (5.4%) patients died. Only 2 (5.4%) patients did not keep active daily lives because of tumor progression. Cumulative local control at 5 years was 85.2%. Local recurrence and recurrence out of the margin dose occurred in 5 (13.5%) and 13 (35.1%) patients, respectively. A larger preoperative maximum diameter was a risk factor for local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.118; P = 0.033), adjacent progression (HR: 1.633; P = 0.015), and remote progression (HR: 2.016; P = 0.003). Symptomatic adverse radiation effects occurred in 1 patient. Salvage GKS and cranial surgery were performed in 9 (24.3%) and 8 (21.6%) patients, respectively. Progression to WHO grade 2-3 occurred in 5 (13.5%) patients. A larger preoperative maximum diameter was a risk factor for progression of WHO grade (HR: 2.016, P = 0.033). Progression out of the margin dose was associated with a larger preoperative tumor size., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Our understanding of metastatic disease is rapidly advancing, with recent evidence supporting an oligometastatic state currently defined by patients having a limited (typically ≤5) number of metastatic deposits. The optimal management of these patients is also shifting toward increased integration of local therapies, with emerging evidence suggesting metastasis-directed therapy can improve overall survival. Additionally, the use of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy within castration-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer cohorts appears to forestall the need to initiate systemic therapy, which has unfavorable side effect profiles, such as androgen deprivation therapy, while itself being associated with little toxicity. We review the literature surrounding the use of metastasis-directed therapy in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer by reviewing the evidence for its use within 3 subgroups: de novo synchronous, oligorecurrent, and oligoprogressive disease.

More than half of all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. A subset of these patients has oligometastatic disease, which exists in an intermediary state between locoregional and disseminated metastatic disease. In addition, some metastatic patients on systemic therapy may have limited disease progression, or oligoprogression. Historically, treatment of metastatic NSCLC was palliative in nature, with little expectation of long-term survival. However, an accumulation of evidence over the past 3 decades now demonstrates that local ablative therapy to sites of limited metastases or progression can improve patient outcomes for this complex disease. This review examines the evidence behind local ablative therapy in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC, with a focus on surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation.

Numerous studies in a variety of solid tumor malignancies have demonstrated prolonged progression-free and overall survival with the addition of definitive local therapies to systemic therapies in patients with a limited number of metastases. A subset of patients with oligometastases (1-5 metastases) may experience long-term disease remission or cure after local therapies such as surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy to metastatic sites. This article reviews the literature in oligometastatic disease and considers a theoretical rationale for a curative approach in a subset of oligometastatic solid tumor patients. In oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients with liver-only metastases and in non-small cell lung cancer patients with disease control after primary therapy and with limited nodal involvement, aggressive local therapies should be considered. Clinical trials and further biomarker validation across disease types are necessary to clarify which subsets of patients may define a theorized "oligometastatic state" and therefore benefit from aggressive local therapies.

Importance: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a hypofractionated, cost-effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer., Objective: To characterize US national trends and the clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate cancer., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data collected by the National Cancer Database to assess the clinical and socioeconomic factors among 106 926 men diagnosed as having prostate cancer from 2010 to 2015 who underwent definitive radiotherapy and the trends in the use of this therapy. The initial analysis was performed between January and February 2018, with final updates performed August 2019., Exposure: Stereotactic body radiotherapy, defined as 5 fractions of radiotherapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal trends and clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with stereotactic body radiotherapy use., Results: In total, 106 926 patients diagnosed as having localized prostate cancer between 2010 and 2015 and receiving definitive radiotherapy were identified. White patients composed 77.3% of this cohort, whereas black patients composed 18.7%. Government-issued insurance was used by 61.2% of patients. More than 80% of patients had a Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score of 0 (range, 0 to ≥3, with lower numbers indicating fewer comorbidities). In the study population, 25.7% had low-risk disease; 26.3%, favorable intermediate-risk disease; 23.3%, unfavorable intermediate-risk disease; and 24.7%, high-risk disease. The proportion of patients who underwent radiotherapy and received stereotactic body radiotherapy (a total of 5395 patients) increased from 3.1% in 2010 to 7.2% in 2015 (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.33-0.40; P < .001). Among the entire cohort, patients received a median dose of 36.25 Gy (range, 30.00-50.00 Gy). Androgen deprivation therapy use increased significantly as disease risk level increased among all patients receiving radiotherapy (9.5% with low risk to 76.6% with high risk; P = .02) and among those receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (4.1% with low risk to 33.2% with high risk; P = .04) or not receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (9.9% with low risk to 77.6% with high risk; P = .04). Patients treated at an academic center, living in an urban area, or possessing higher incomes and those who were healthier, white individuals, or were diagnosed as having lower-risk prostate cancer had higher odds of receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy., Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that stereotactic body radiotherapy use in prostate cancer more than doubled from 2010 to 2015 but accounted for less than 10% of all patients undergoing radiotherapy. Androgen deprivation therapy use increased with disease risk among patients overall, regardless of receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy. Socioeconomic and clinical determinants of stereotactic body radiotherapy included risk category, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score, facility type and location, income, race/ethnicity, and year of diagnosis. These results are hypothesis generating; further studies evaluating potential disparities in stereotactic body radiotherapy use in localized prostate cancer are warranted.

This review outlines the history of the oligometastatic state from its first proposal to the current formulation. The article discusses the accumulating evidence for the biology of oligometastases, including clinical parameters, such as number and rate of progression, as well as ongoing molecular profiling efforts. The authors then discuss the current state of prospective clinical trials. They review the early site-specific as well as subsite agnostic studies using stereotactic body radiation therapy. Moreover, the article makes the case for why phase II trials should not be practice changing, and highlights the pivotal importance of accruing to phase III clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a common treatment modality for vestibular schwannoma (VS), with a role in primary and recurrent/progressive algorithms. At our institution, routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is obtained at 6 and 12 mo following SRS for VS., Objective: To analyze the safety and financial impact of eliminating the 6-mo post-SRS MRI in asymptomatic VS patients., Methods: A prospectively maintained SRS database was retrospectively reviewed for VS patients with 1 yr of post-treatment follow-up, 2005 to 2015. Decisions at 6-mo MRI were binarily categorized as routine follow-up vs clinical action-defined as a clinical visit, additional imaging, or an operation as a direct result of the 6-mo study., Results: A total of 296 patients met screening criteria, of whom 53 were excluded for incomplete follow-up and 8 for NF-2. Nine were reimaged prior to 6 mo due to clinical symptoms. Routine 6-mo post-SRS MRI was completed by 226 patients (76% of screened cohort), following from which zero instances of clinical action occurred. When scaled using national insurance database-derived financials-which estimated the mean per-study charge for MRI of the brain with and without contrast at $1767-the potential annualized national charge reduction was approximated as $1 611 504., Conclusion: For clinically stable VS, 6-mo post-SRS MRI does not contribute significantly to management. We recommend omitting routine MRI before 12 mo, in patients without new or progressive neurological symptoms. If extrapolated nationally to the more than 100 active SRS centers, thousands of patients would be spared an inconvenient, nonindicated study, and national savings in health care dollars would be on the order of millions annually., (Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: Surgical resection is typically cited as the optimal treatment of patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II arteriovenous malformation (AVM)., Objective: To report our experience with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II AVM., Methods: A prospectively maintained registry was reviewed for patients with nonsyndromic Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II AVM having SRS from 1990 to 2011. Patients with <24 mo of follow-up or prior radiotherapy/SRS were excluded, resulting in a study population of 173 patients. Actuarial analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed with excellent outcomes (obliteration without new deficits) as the dependent variable., Results: Median post-SRS follow-up was 68 mo (range, 24-275). AVM obliteration was achieved in 132 (76%) after initial SRS. Eleven additional patients achieved obliteration after repeat SRS for an overall obliteration rate of 83%. The rate of obliteration was 60% at 4 yr and 78% at 8 yr. Post-SRS hemorrhage occurred in 7 patients (4%), resulting in 3 minor deficits (2%) and 1 death (<1%). Radiation-induced complications occurred in 5 patients (3%), resulting in minor deficits only. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (79%) had excellent outcomes at last follow-up., Conclusion: SRS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II AVM. Selection bias is likely a contributing factor to explain the superior outcomes generally noted in reported series of microsurgery for patients with low grade AVM., (Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a young technology that can deliver a high dose of radiation to the target, utilizing either a single dose or a small number of fractions with a high degree of precision within the body. Various technical solutions co-exist nowadays, with particular features, possibilities and limitations. Health care authorities have currently validated SBRT in a very limited number of locations, but many indications are still under investigation. It is therefore challenging to accurately appreciate the SBRT therapeutic index, its place and its role within the anticancer therapeutic arsenal. The aim of the present review is to provide SBRT definitions, current indications, and summarize the future ways of research. There are three validated indications for SBRT: un-resecable T1-T2 non small cell lung cancer, <3 slow-growing pulmonary metastases secondary to a stabilized primary, and the tumours located close to the medulla. In other situations, the benefit of SBRT is still to be demonstrated. One of the most promising way of research is the ablative treatment of oligo metastatic cancers, with recent studies suggesting a survival benefit. Furthermore, the most recent data suggest that SBRT is safe. Finally, the SBRT combined with immune therapies is promising, since it could theoretically trigger the adaptative anticancer response., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We sought to characterize temporal trends of radiation oncology resident-reported external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) case experience with respect to various disease sites, including trends in stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy cases., Methods and Materials: Summarized, deidentified case logs for graduating radiation oncology residents between 2007 and 2018 were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education national summary data report. Mean number of cumulative cases and standard deviations per graduating resident by year were evaluated. Cases were subdivided into 12 disease-site categories using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education classification. Analysis of variance was used to determine significant differences, and strength of association was evaluated using Pearson correlation., Results: The number of graduating residents per year increased by 66% from 114 in 2007 to 189 in 2018 (P < .001, r = 0.88). The overall mean number of EBRT cases per graduating resident decreased by 13.2% from 521.9 in 2007 to 478.5 in 2018, with a decrease in the ratio of nonmetastatic to metastatic cases per graduating resident. There was significant variation among the disease categories analyzed; however, the largest proportionate decreases were seen in hematologic, lung, and genitourinary malignancies. Stereotactic radiosurgery volume per graduating resident increased from an average of 27.9 cases in 2007 to 50.3 in 2018 (P < .001, r = 0.96). Stereotactic body radiation therapy volume per graduating resident increased as well, from a mean of 6 cases in 2007 to 55.6 cases in 2018 (P < .001, r = 0.99)., Conclusions: We report a longitudinal summary of resident-reported experience in EBRT cases. These findings have implications for future efforts to optimize residency training programs and requirements., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been shown to reliably improve several symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) in appropriately selected patients. Various factors may preclude patients from undergoing DBS and for them, non-invasive lesion-based therapies such as focused ultrasound and Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery may present a safer alternative., Materials and Methods: Based on preliminary positive reports of STN GK for PD, we conducted a prospective, open-label, single-center, pilot study in PD patients deemed potential candidates for unilateral DBS based on their disease characteristics, but contraindicated due to age >74, an irreversible bleeding diathesis, or significant comorbid medical disease. Stereotactic MRI-guided GK radiosurgery was performed using a single 110- or 120-Gy dose targeting the STN contralateral to the more symptomatic extremity. Clinical follow-up and imaging assessed the safety and efficacy of the procedure over a 12-month period., Results: Four PD patients with medication-refractory tremors and disabling dyskinesias underwent unilateral STN GK radiosurgery. Contraindications to DBS included high-risk comorbid cardiovas-cular disease in 3 patients and an irreversible bleeding diathesis in 1. There were no immediate post-procedural adverse events. One patient who underwent left STN GK radiosurgery developed right hemiparesis and dysarthria 7 months post-procedure followed by hospitalization at 9 months for bacterial endocarditis and liver failure from which he died. The remaining 3 patients were free of adverse events up to 12 months post-procedure and experienced a reduction in contralateral rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor. Upon extended follow-up, 2 patients developed subacute worsening of gait. One died at 16 months due to complications of a fall whereas the other saw no change in gait up to 42 months post-procedure. All 3 patients with adverse events demonstrated a hyper-response in the targeted area on follow-up neuroimaging., Discussion/conclusion: Despite the potential for clinical improvement, our results suggest that unilateral STN GK radiosurgery should be approached cautiously in medically frail PD patients who may be at higher risk of GK hyper-response and neurologic complications., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a relatively novel form of high precision radiotherapy. For low- and intermediate risk patients, ultrahypofractionation (UHF - more than 5 Gy per day) has been compared to conventionally fractionated or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in two large randomized studies. A third smaller randomized study examined the question of the optimal frequency of treatments. The results of these studies will be reviewed. SABR for high risk prostate cancer has been shown to be feasible and is well tolerated with careful planning and setup techniques. However, there is currently insufficient data supporting its use for high-risk patients to offer SABR outside of a clinical trial. SABR costs less to the radiotherapydepartments and, the patient, as well as increasing system capacity. Therefore, it has the potential to be widely adopted in the next few years.

The Gamma Knife Center of St. Louis has established itself as a key facility offering stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for a variety of neuro-oncologic disorders. Since the Gamma Knife unit was first brought to Washington University in 1997, we have treated 5,696 patients. In this review, we discuss the effective role of Gamma Knife SRS in the treatment strategies for patients with neuro-oncologic disorders including brain metastases, meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, and acoustic neuromas. While there is active ongoing research evaluating the most effective treatment for patients with these disorders, it is clear that best management practices may be tailored for individual patients utilizing SRS either alone or in conjunction alternative treatment strategies including open neurosurgical procedures, laser thermos-ablative surgery, and even new medical oncological treatment strategies., (Copyright 2020 by the Missouri State Medical Association.)

Background: Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas (VS) has been theorized to allow for tumor control with higher rates of hearing preservation in selected patients with useful hearing. However, there is a paucity of literature with formal audiologic measures of hearing preservation to support the standard use of fractionated SRS in VS. We hypothesized that fractionation would diminish the amount of hearing damage., Objective: To evaluate the relationship between audiologic performance and SRS fractionation scheme., Methods: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective review of patients treated with 1, 3, or 5 fraction SRS for VS at our institution from 1998 to 2016. Pre- and post-SRS audiograms with speech awareness threshold (SAT) in treated and contralateral ears were obtained. Contralateral ear measurements were used for hearing normalization to account for presbycusis., Results: Fifty-six patients with median audiologic follow-up 2.0 yr (mean 2.66 yr, min-max 0.50-9.45 yr) were included. Patients treated with single fractionation had a significantly worsened SAT (dB) compared to patients treated with 5 fractions (P = .008) and compared to all multifraction patients (P = .009) at 12 to 24 mo follow-up., Conclusion: This retrospective analysis supports the use of fractionated SRS to preserve hearing in patients with VS. SAT can be used as an objective metric of hearing response to radiosurgery., (Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS; Elekta AB) remains a well-established treatment modality for vestibular schwannomas. Despite highly effective tumor control, further research is needed toward optimizing long-term functional outcomes. Whereas dose-rate effects may impact post-treatment toxicities given tissue dose-response relationships, potential effects remain largely unexplored., Objective: To evaluate treatment outcomes and potential dose-rate effects following definitive GKRS for vestibular schwannomas., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 419 patients treated at our institution between 1998 and 2015, characterizing baseline demographics, pretreatment symptoms, and GKRS parameters. The cohort was divided into 2 dose-rate groups based on the median value (2.675 Gy/min). Outcomes included clinical tumor control, radiographic progression-free survival, serviceable hearing preservation, hearing loss, and facial nerve dysfunction (FND). Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox regression., Results: The study cohort included 227 patients with available follow-up. Following GKRS 2-yr and 4-yr clinical tumor control rates were 98% (95% CI: 95.6%-100%) and 96% (95% CI: 91.4%-99.6%), respectively. Among 177 patients with available radiographic follow-up, 2-yr and 4-yr radiographic progression-free survival rates were 97% (95% CI: 94.0%-100.0%) and 88% (95% CI: 81.2%-95.0%). The serviceable hearing preservation rate was 72.2% among patients with baseline Gardner-Robertson class I/II hearing and post-treatment audiological evaluations. Most patients experienced effective relief from prior headaches (94.7%), tinnitus (83.7%), balance issues (62.7%), FND (90.0%), and trigeminal nerve dysfunction (79.2%), but not hearing loss (1.0%). Whereas GKRS provided effective tumor control independently of dose rate, GKRS patients exposed to lower dose rates experienced significantly better freedom from post-treatment hearing loss and FND (P = .044)., Conclusion: Whereas GKRS provides excellent tumor control and effective symptomatic relief for vestibular schwannomas, dose-rate effects may impact post-treatment functional outcomes. Further research remains warranted., (© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2019.)

Stereotactic radiation therapy (RT) involves the delivery of high dose-per-fraction treatments to small intracranial (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]) and extracranial (stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) sites. SRS and SBRT share several overarching principles that differentiate stereotactic RT from conventionally fractionated radiation techniques. This review describes historical aspects of SRS/SBRT and definitions thereof, and a comparison with more modern semantics. Key principles of the stereotactic radiotherapeutic modalities are discussed, followed by an overview of the technical considerations involved. Lastly, the accepted appropriate clinical indications for stereotactic RT are outlined, and the potential role of stereotactic treatment in future oncologic management are also discussed., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Some patients are diagnosed with asymptomatic meningioma(s) after undergoing a screening CT and MRI for minor ailments or postresection., Objective: To help clinicians in decision making for treatment of asymptomatic meningiomas., Methods: A single center retrospective cohort study of 117 patients with 122 tumors treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS; Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Patients were followed with longitudinal imaging and clinical evaluations. Tumor volumetry and developments of new signs or symptoms after GKRS were the end points in the study., Results: Median patient age at GKRS was 60 yr (range 21-86 yr) with a median clinical follow-up of 53 mo (range 20-252 mo). The median pre-GKRS tumor volume was 3.6 ± 3.8 cc (±standard deviation). Tumors were treated with a median margin dose of 14 ± 2 Gy. At last follow-up, median tumor volume was 2.5 ± 3.6 cc. Radiological progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 97% and 94.4% at 5 yr and 10 yr, respectively. Clinical PFS rates were 86% and 70% at 5 yr and 10 yr, respectively. Development of neurological complications was seen in 21 (18%) patients, and 11 (52%) of them had undergone surgical resection prior to GKRS., Conclusion: GKRS is a reasonable treatment strategy for asymptomatic meningiomas and compares favorably to natural history studies in terms of tumor control and neurological preservation. It results in relatively low morbidity in previously untreated meningiomas and serves as an appealing alternative treatment modality for recurrent meningiomas in asymptomatic patients., (Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in pediatric patients exhibit remarkable differences in terms of management and outcomes. Owing to a paucity of relevant data pertaining to AVMs in pediatric patients, special interest and investigation are required for an improved understanding of the available evidence by clinicians., Objective: To determine the clinical outcomes of single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for AVMs in pediatric patients., Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies that reported the outcomes of SRS for AVMs in pediatric patients. Data pertaining to variables such as obliteration rate, post-SRS new hemorrhage rate, post-SRS new neurological deficit rate, and mortality rate were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis techniques., Results: Based on pooled data from 20 studies with 1212 patients, single-session SRS resulted in complete obliteration in 65.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.5%-71.1%; I2 = 66.5%) patients. Overall complication rate (including new hemorrhage, new neurodeficit, and mortality) was 8.0% (95% CI, 5.1%-11.5%; I2 = 66.4%). Post-SRS new neurological deficit rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 1.3%-5.4%; I2 = 59.7%), and post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 4.2% (95% CI, 2.5%-6.3%; I2 = 42.7%). There was no significant difference between studies disaggregated by treatment method (Gamma Knife [Elekta AB] vs other), treatment year (before year 2000 vs after year 2000), median AVM volume reported (≥3 vs <3 cm3), median dose reported (≥20 vs <20 Gy), or follow-up period (≥36 vs <36 mo)., Conclusion: Single-SRS is a safe treatment alternative that achieves high obliteration rates and acceptable complication rates for AVMs in pediatric patients., (Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Objective: This study was conducted to achieve more conclusive evidence for the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs)., Methods: A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed and studies reporting the outcomes of SRS for BSCMs were included. The primary outcome was the pre-SRS and post-SRS hemorrhage rates; the pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence interval was chosen as effect size. Lesion control, symptom change, and radiation-related complications were evaluated., Results: A total of 576 patients across 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The post-SRS hemorrhage rate was significantly decreased compared with the pre-SRS rate (IRR, 0.123; P < 0.001), and the hemorrhage rate 2 years after SRS was significantly lower than that within 2 years after SRS (IRR, 0.317; P < 0.001). Ten among 14 studies have shown that the symptoms were improved or stationary after SRS. Lesion volume was reduced in 47.3% of the patients and was stationary in 49.4% on the last follow-up images. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects (AREs) developed in 7.3% and permanent AREs were observed in 2.2%. In subgroup analysis, studies having mean marginal dose of ≤13 Gy showed statistically significantly lower development of symptomatic AREs than those having mean marginal dose of >13Gy (2.0% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.008)., Conclusions: SRS using a relatively low marginal dose can be a safe and effective treatment for BSCM. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm the optimal radiation dose and efficacy of SRS for BSCMs., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Up to 50% of patients develop central nervous system involvement, and a subset of these patients can present with isolated tumor-like masses., Objective: To describe the skull base manifestations of ECD with an emphasis on aspects most pertinent to surgeons who may be referred such patients for primary evaluation., Methods: Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched from database inception to May 1, 2018 for articles reporting skull base ECD. An institutional retrospective analysis of all patients treated at the authors' institution since January 1, 1996 was also performed to supplement these data., Results: Of 465 retrieved articles, 18 studies totaling 20 patients met inclusion criteria. Institutional review identified an additional 7 patients. Collectively, the median age at diagnosis was 49 yr (interquartile range, 42-58) with a 4:1 male-to-female ratio. Patients frequently presented with diplopia (48%), headache (30%), dysarthria (22%), and vertigo or imbalance (22%), though trigeminal hypesthesia (11%), facial nerve paresis (7%), hearing loss (7%), and trigeminal neuralgia (7%) were also observed. ECD commonly mimicked meningioma (33%), trigeminal schwannoma (8%), neurosarcoidosis (8%), and skull base lymphoma (8%)., Conclusion: Discrete skull base lesions frequently mimic more common pathology such as meningioma or cranial nerve schwannomas. Medical therapy comprises the initial treatment for symptomatic skull base disease. Surgical resection is not curative and the utility of surgical intervention is largely limited to biopsy to establish diagnosis and/or surgical debulking to relieve mass effect., (Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)