Search

Purpose: Renal and hematological toxicity are side effects and dose-limiting factors of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT). We aimed to assess the changes in renal and hematological function and associations with survival in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients treated with PRRT., Methods: A retrospective cohort of 448 NET patients treated with either 177 Lu-DOTATATE or 90 Y-DOTATOC were followed for changes of renal and hematological function. Renal function was assessed by monitoring changes in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Hematological function was determined by examining changes in white blood cell counts (WBC), platelet counts, and hemoglobin levels over time. Piecewise linear mixed effect models were applied to model the longitudinal repeated measurements of renal and hematological function. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were modelled using Cox proportional hazard regressions., Results: Of the 448 PRRT treated patients, 335 received 177 Lu-DOTATATE (74.78%) and 113 were treated with 90 Y-DOTATOC (25.22%). Comparing patients treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE to those treated with 90 Y-DOTATOC, renal function did not differ significantly prior to, during or after PRRT. Compared with patients treated with 90 Y-DOTATOC, significantly decreased indicators of hematological function were observed in those treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE prior to and during PRRT treatment (WBC: estimate, -0.10, 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.05; P < 0.001; platelet count: estimate, -2.53, 95% CI, -3.83 to -1.24; P < 0.001), and no significant recovery was observed in hematological function post PRRT. Individuals who received 177 Lu-DOTATATE tended to have a longer PFS (hazard ratio, 0.47, 95%CI: 0.28-0.79, P = 0.004) compared with 90 Y-DOTATOC, but there was no difference in OS., Conclusion: There was no significant renal, but minor hematological toxicity, in patients treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE compared with 90 Y-DOTATOC. Compared to 90 Y-DOTATOC, 177 Lu-DOTATATE appears to enhance PFS, but not OS. Treatment with 177 Lu-DOTATATE may necessitate follow-up for hematological toxicity irrespective of other therapies prior to PRRT., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Optimal patient management protocols for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are poorly defined and even further complexified with new therapy approvals, such as radiopharmaceuticals. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent 177 Lu vipivotide tetraxetan ([ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), approved after the phase III VISION study, presents physicians with additional aspects of patient management, including specific adverse event (AE) monitoring and management, as well as radiation safety. Drawing on our experience as VISION study investigators, here we provide guidance on best practices for delivering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to patients with mCRPC. After a comprehensive review of published evidence and guidelines on RPT management in prostate cancer, we identified educational gaps in managing the radiation safety and AEs associated with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Our results showed that providing sufficient education on AEs (e.g., fatigue and dry mouth) and radiation safety principles is key to effective delivery and management of patient expectations. Patient counseling by health care professionals, across disciplines, is a cornerstone of optimal patient management during PSMA-targeted RPT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, and physicians must adhere to radiation safety protocols and counsel patients on radiation safety considerations. Treatment with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is generally well tolerated; however, additional interventions may be required, such as dosing modification, medications, or transfusions. Urinary incontinence can be challenging in the context of radiation safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between medical oncologists and nuclear medicine teams ensures that patients are monitored and managed safely and efficiently. In clinical practice, the benefit-to-risk ratio should always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Purpose: To characterize the response and survival outcomes of yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for unresectable, liver-dominant metastases from primary neoplasms other than colorectal carcinoma., Materials and Methods: This study included 1,474 patients enrolled in the Radiation-Emitting Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR)-Spheres in Nonresectable Liver Tumor registry who received resin 90 Y-TARE as part of their oncologic management for unresectable primary or secondary liver tumors (NCT02685631). Of these patients, 33% (481/1,474) were treated for liver metastases of noncolorectal origin (m-non-CRC) compared with 34% (497/1,474) treated for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and 34% (496/1,474) treated for hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment response and cancer survival probabilities were computed and compared for each primary cancer type. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare survival outcomes., Results: Radiological responses were observed in 12 unique cancer types, mostly heavily pretreated malignancies refractory to multiple lines of systemic therapies. The overall use of resin 90 Y-TARE in m-non-CRC resulted in better treatment outcomes in terms of duration of response, progression-free survival, time to progression, and overall survival (P = .04, P = .02, P = .01, and P = .04, respectively). Analyses of cancer cell types revealed that metastatic neuroendocrine tumor, sarcoma, and ovarian, renal, prostate, and breast cancers were associated with superior treatment outcomes, whereas worse treatment outcomes were observed in metastatic lung, gastric, pancreatic, and esophageal cancers., Conclusions: Real-world data demonstrate the use of resin 90 Y-TARE in m-non-CRC refractory to standard chemotherapy. For some cell types, this expanded use achieved superior treatment outcomes relative to the reference standard of mCRC, suggesting the need for inquiry into broadened indications for 90 Y-TARE., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is an established somatostatin receptor (SSTR) agonist for the treatment of metastasized neuroendocrine neoplasms, while the SSTR antagonist [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-LM3 has only scarcely been employed in clinics. Impressive preclinical data obtained with [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 in tumor-bearing mice indicated the potential of terbium-161 as an alternative to lutetium-177. The aim of the present study was to compare the tolerability of 161 Tb- and 177 Lu-based DOTA-LM3 and DOTATATE in immunocompetent mice., Methods: Dosimetry calculations were performed based on biodistribution data of the radiopeptides in immunocompetent mice. Treatment-related effects on blood cell counts were assessed on Days 10, 28 and 56 after application of [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 or [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE at 20 MBq per mouse. These radiopeptides were also applied at 100 MBq per mouse and the effects compared to those observed after application of the 177 Lu-labeled counterparts. Bone marrow smears, blood plasma parameters and organ histology were assessed at the end of the study., Results: The absorbed organ dose was commonly higher for the SSTR antagonist than for the SSTR agonist and for terbium-161 over lutetium-177. Application of a therapeutic activity level of 20 MBq [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 or [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE was well tolerated without major hematological changes. The injection of 100 MBq of the 161 Tb- and 177 Lu-based somatostatin analogues affected the blood cell counts, however. The lymphocytes were 40-50% lower in treated mice compared to the untreated controls on Day 10 irrespective of the radionuclide employed. At the same timepoint, thrombocyte and erythrocyte counts were 30-50% and 6-12% lower, respectively, after administration of the SSTR antagonist (p < 0.05) while changes were less pronounced in mice injected with the SSTR agonist. All blood cell counts were in the normal range on Day 56. Histological analyses revealed minimal abnormalities in the kidneys, liver and spleen of treated mice. No correlation was observed between the organ dose and frequency of the occurrence of abnormalities., Conclusion: Hematologic changes were more pronounced in mice treated with the SSTR antagonist than in those treated with the SSTR agonist. Despite the increased absorbed dose delivered by terbium-161 over lutetium-177, [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 and [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE should be safe at activity levels that are recommended for their respective 177 Lu-based analogues., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: Rechallenge of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) was proposed for patients who initially responded to PSMA-RLT experiencing partial remission, but relapsed into progression after a certain period of remission. However, only limited data is available regarding this approach. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety profile of one or more series of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge in patients from a prospective registry (REALITY Study, NCT04833517) after they initially benefited from PSMA-RLT., Methods: Forty-seven patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had biochemical response to initial [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT followed by disease progression received at least one (up to three) series of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge. Biochemical response rates based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum value, PSA-based progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Adverse events of the treatment were assessed according to 'common terminology criteria for adverse events' (CTCAE)., Results: After one series of RLT rechallenge, a PSA decline of at least 50% was achieved in 27/47 patients (57.4%). The median PFS of all patients was 8.7 mo and the median OS was 22.7 mo, each calculated from the administration of the first rechallenge series. Patients who responded (PSA decline > 50%) to the rechallenge showed a median OS of 27.3 mo. Regarding PFS, a significant correlation (r = 0.4128, p = 0.0323) was found for these patients comparing initial and rechallenge RLT. Ten patients received a second and 3 patients received a third rechallenge series with 8/10 and 3/3 patients responding to repeated RLT rechallenge. No severe deterioration of adverse events rated by CTCAE criteria was observed., Conclusion: [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge is associated with significant PSA response and encouraging survival outcome as well as a very favourable safety profile and should therefore be considered as a straight-forward treatment option in mCRPC patients, who previously benefited from PSMA-RLT., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To utilize voxel-based dosimetry following radiation segmentectomy (RS) to understand microsphere distribution and validate current literature regarding radiologic and pathologic outcomes., Materials and Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (N = 56) treated with yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) RS with glass microspheres (Therasphere; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) from 2020 to 2022 was performed. Posttreatment voxel-based dosimetry was evaluated using Mirada DBx Build 1.2.0 Simplicit 90 Y software (Boston Scientific) and utilized to calculate sphere concentration to tumor as well as D 70 (minimum dose to 70% total tumor volume), D 90 , and D 99 . Time to progression (TTP), treatment response, and adverse events were studied., Results: Fifty-six solitary tumors were analyzed with a median tumor diameter of 3.4 cm (range, 1.2-6.8 cm) and median tumor absorbed dose of 732 Gy (range, 252-1,776 Gy). Median sphere activity (SA) at the time of delivery was 1,446 Bq (range, 417-2,621 Bq). Median tumor sphere concentration was 12,868 spheres/mL (range, 2,655-37,183 spheres/mL). Sphere concentration into tumor and normal tissue was inversely correlated with perfused treatment volume (R 2  = 0.21 and R 2  = 0.39, respectively). Of the 51 tumors with posttreatment imaging, objective response was noted in 49 patients (96%) and complete response in 42 patients (82%). The median TTP was not reached with a 2-year progression rate of 11%. Fifteen patients underwent liver transplant. Median tumor necrosis was 99% (range, 80%-100%). Lower tumor volumes and higher D 99 were associated with complete pathologic necrosis (P < .001 and P = .022, respectively)., Conclusions: Voxel-based dosimetry following 90 Y radioembolization can be utilized to account for sphere deposition and distribution into tumor. Ablative RS with high SA yields durable radiologic and pathologic outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lutetium-177 [ 177 Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 improves survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but whether it confers a benefit in hormone-sensitive disease is unknown. We aimed to evaluate [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 before docetaxel treatment in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer., Methods: UpFrontPSMA was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 11 Australian hospitals. Eligible patients had prostate adenocarcinoma without clinically significant neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell histology, were aged 18 years or older, had less than 4 weeks on androgen deprivation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had high-volume PSMA-avid disease on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with no major discordance on 2-[ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental treatment ([ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed 6 weeks later by docetaxel) or standard-of-care treatment (docetaxel alone) using computer-based block randomisation with random block sizes, stratified by disease volume by conventional imaging and duration of androgen deprivation therapy at the time of registration. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the experimental group received two cycles of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7·5 GBq every 6 weeks intravenously, followed 6 weeks later by six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks intravenously, whereas patients in the standard-of-care treatment group received six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks intravenously. All patients received continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0·2 ng/mL) at 48 weeks, assessed using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04343885., Findings: Between May 5, 2020, and April 18, 2023, 130 patients were randomly assigned, 63 (48%) to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel and 67 (52%) to docetaxel alone. All patients were male and no race or ethnicity data were collected. Median follow-up was 2·5 years (IQR 1·8-3·0). Four patients in the docetaxel alone group withdrew consent after randomisation and no data beyond screening were collected. An additional four patients were not evaluable for the primary endpoint at 48 weeks (two in each group). 25 (41%) of 61 patients (95% CI 30-54) in the [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group had undetectable PSA at 48 weeks compared with ten (16%) of 61 patients (9-28) in the docetaxel alone group (OR 3·88, 95% CI 1·61-9·38; p=0·0020). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (seven [11%] of 63 patients in the [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group vs six [10%] of 63 patients in the docetaxel alone group) and diarrhoea (four [6%] of 63 patients vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 16 (25%) patients in the [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group (none were definitely related to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617) and 16 (25%) patients in the docetaxel alone group. No treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed by docetaxel improved antitumour activity in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer compared with docetaxel alone, without increased toxic effects. Our data potentially support a role for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer., Funding: Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember Foundation and Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund), US Department of Defence Impact Award-Clinical Trials, Endocyte/Advanced Accelerator Applications (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Victorian Cancer Agency, University of Melbourne, and Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AAA reports grants from Aptevo Therapeutics (institutional), Astellas (investigator), Astellas (institutional), AstraZeneca (institutional), AstraZeneca (investigator), Bionomics (institutional), Bristol Myers Squibb (institutional), Eli Lilly (institutional), Exelixis (institutional), Gilead Sciences (institutional), GlaxoSmithKline (institutional), Hinova (institutional), Ipsen (institutional), Janssen (institutional), MedImmune (institutional), Merck Serono (investigator), Merck Serono (institutional), Merck Sharpe & Dohme (institutional), Novartis (institutional), Pfizer (institutional), Sanofi Aventis (institutional), and SYNthorx (institutional); consulting fees from Astellas, Novartis, Janssen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Tolmar, Telix Pharma, Merck, Bayer, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Amgen, and Noxopharm; honoraria from Janssen, Astellas, Novartis, Tolmar, Amgen, Pfizer, Bayer, Telix Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Noxopharm, Daiichi Sankyo, and Arvinas; speakers' bureau fees from Astellas, Novartis, Amgen, Bayer, Janssen, Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Serono; support for attending meetings from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Hinova, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, and Tolmar; participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Arvinas, Astellas, Novartis, Janssen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Tolmar, Telix Pharma, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bayer, Ipsen, Merck Serono, Amgen, Noxopharm, and Daiichi Sankyo. MV reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Merck Sharpe & Dohme and grants (to their institution) from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Alpine Immune Sciences, Virocure, Hinova, Atridia/Hengrui, Antengene, and Biogene. AJW declares grants to their institution from Merck Sharpe & Dohme; consulting fees from Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ipsen, and Astellas; honoraria from Astellas and Bristol Myers Squibb; and support for attending meetings from Bayer. AG reports grants from Sun Pharma; consulting fees from Regeneron and Bayer; support to attend meetings from Sun Pharma and Bristol Myers Squibb; and participation in a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Regeneron and Bayer. RJF reports committee involvement in the Australasian Radiopharmaceutical Trials Network (unpaid). LE reports research grant support (to their institution) from Novartis and Clarity Pharma; consulting fees for lectures or advisory boards from Astellas, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Clarity, Novartis, and Telix in the past 5 years; and philanthropic grant support from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, St Vincent's Clinic Research Foundation, and the Curran Foundation. DGM has received reimbursement for advisory board or speaker bureau activity from the following companies (in the past 36 months): Janssen, Astellas, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Mundipharma, Novartis, and Ipsen. AR has received reimbursement for advisory board or speaker bureau activity from the following companies: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Lily, Pfizer, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, and Novartis. DAP reports personal fees from Eisai. MSH reports grants and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, NHRMC, Movember, US Department of Defense, Medical Research Future Fund, Bayer, Peter MacCallum Foundation, Isotopia, and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation; consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis; honoraria from Janssen, Novartis, and AstraZeneca; and support for meetings from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Astellas. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Performing MIRP procedure with a 20-fold less MIBI isotope dose allows lower radiation exposure risk for both patient and staff and reduce the overall cost of the procedure. The main goal of this systemic review and meta-analysis is to prove the non-inferiority of the very low dose MIRP compared to the standard dose., Methods: We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of three different electronic databases - PubMed, Web of Science and google scholar. Meta-extraction was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines., Results: Among 4750 studies imported for screening, only 13 studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Analyzed data from the 13 selected studies performed with low dose MIRP demonstrated a detection rate greater than 97 ​% and a success rate greater than 95 ​%, which is comparable to the cure rate required by current guidelines, as well as to data published by studies using the original high dose protocol., Conclusion: Very low dose MIRP is not inferior to the high dose original MIRP and may be used in separate day protocol routinely., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: 18 F-labelled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) analogs offer several advantages over 68 Ga in terms of yield, cost, spatial resolution and detection rate. This study presents an interim analysis of a prospective trial designed to assess the safety, biodistribution and dosimetry of [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3, and compare its diagnostic efficacy and clinical management outcomes with [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE or [ 68 Ga]Ga-NODAGA-LM3 in patients with well-differentiated NETs., Methods: Twenty-one patients with histologically confirmed well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G1 and G2) were prospectively recruited. The first eight patients underwent serial PET scans at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 injection to assess biodistribution and dosimetry. The remaining patients underwent whole-body PET/CT scans. [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT were done within a week, with a minimum 24-hour interval between the two scans. Focal uptake above the surrounding background activity and could not be explained by physiologic uptake was considered lesions of NETs. Lesion number, tumor uptake, and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were compared. In patients with discrepant findings, the size of the smallest lesions (measured on coregistered CT) detected on [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was compared., Results: [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was safe and well-tolerated. Physiological uptake of [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was significantly lower than that of [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in abdominal organs and bone marrow, but higher in blood pool and lung. The mean effective dose was 0.024 ± 0.014 mSv/MBq. [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 detected significantly more liver lesions (457 vs. 291, P = 0.006) and lymph node lesions (30 vs. 22, P = 0.011) compared to [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. The tumor uptake was comparable, but TBR was significantly higher with [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 for lesions from all sites except for the duodenum. The size of the minimum liver lesions (0.54 ± 0.15 vs. 1.01 ± 0.49, P<0.001) and lymph node lesions (0.50 ± 0.19 vs. 1.26 ± 0.86, P = 0.024) detected on [ 18 F]ALF-NOTA-LM3 were significantly smaller than those detected on [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE., Conclusion: [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 shows favorable biodistribution, higher spatial resolution and superior performance than [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in detecting liver and lymph node metastases, with higher TBR. Notably, it is the first SSTR analog to show superiority in detecting lymph node lesions when compared to [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06056362., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To determine 6-month interim safety, effectiveness, and multimodal imageability of imageable glass microsphere yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a first-in-human trial., Materials and Methods: Imageable microspheres (Eye90 Microspheres; ABK Biomedical, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada), a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Breakthrough-Designated Device consisting of glass radiopaque 90 Y microspheres visible on computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission CT (SPECT), were used to treat 6 subjects with unresectable HCC. Patients underwent selective (≤2 segments) treatment in a prospective open-label pilot trial. Key inclusion criteria included liver-only HCC, performance status ≤1, total lesion diameter ≤9 cm, and Child-Pugh A status. Prospective partition dosimetry was utilized. Safety (measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v5), multimodal imageability on CT and SPECT, and 3- and 6-month imaging response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were evaluated., Results: Seven tumors in 6 subjects were treated and followed to 180 days. Administration success was 100%. Microsphere distribution measured by radiopacity on CT correlated with SPECT. Ninety-day target lesion complete response (CR) was observed in 3 of 6 subjects (50%) and partial response (PR) in 2 (33.3%). At 180 days, target lesion CR was maintained in 3 subjects (50%) and PR in 1 (16.7%). Two subjects could not be reassessed, having undergone intervening chemoembolization. All subjects reported adverse events (AEs), and 5 reported AEs related to treatment. There were no treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs., Conclusions: Radioembolization using imageable microspheres was safe and effective in 6 subjects with unresectable HCC at 6-month interim analysis. Microsphere distribution by radiopacity on CT correlated with radioactivity distribution by SPECT, providing previously unavailable CT-based tumor targeting information., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Local recurrence remains the main cause of death in stage III-IV nonmetastatic head and neck cancer (HNC), with relapse-prone regions within high 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET)-signal gross tumor volume. We investigated if dose escalation within this subvolume combined with a 3-phase treatment adaptation could increase local (LC) and regional (RC) control at equal or minimized radiation-induced toxicity, by comparing adaptive 18 F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based dose painting by numbers (A-DPBN) with nonadaptive standard intensity modulated radiation therapy (S-IMRT)., Methods and Materials: This 2-center randomized controlled phase 2 trial assigned (1:1) patients to receive A-DPBN or S-IMRT (+/-chemotherapy). Eligibility: nonmetastatic HNC of oral cavity, oro-/hypopharynx, or larynx, needing radio(chemo)therapy; T1-4N0-3 (exception: T1-2N0 glottic); KPS ≥ 70; ≥18 years; and informed consent., Primary Outcomes: 1-year LC and RC. The dose prescription for A-DPBN was intercurrently adapted in 2 steps to an absolute dose-volume limit (≤1.75 cm 3 can receive >84 Gy and normalized isoeffective dose >96 Gy) as a safety measure during the study course after 4/7 A-DPBN patients developed ≥G3 mucosal ulcers., Results: Ninety-five patients were randomized (A-DPBN, 47; S-IMRT, 48). Median follow-up was 31 months (IQR, 14-48 months); 29 patients died (17 of cancer progression). A-DPBN resulted in superior LC compared with S-IMRT, with 1- and 2-year LC of 91% and 88% versus 78% and 75%, respectively (hazard ratio, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.13-8.71; P = .021). RC and overall survival were comparable between arms, as was overall grade (G) ≥3 late toxicity (36% vs 20%; P = .1). More ≥G3 late mucosal ulcers were observed in active smokers (29% vs 3%; P = .005) and alcohol users (33% vs 13%; P = .02), independent of treatment arm. Similarly, in the A-DPBN arm, significantly more patients who smoked at diagnosis developed ≥G3 (46% vs 12%; P = .005) and ≥G4 (29% vs 8%; P = .048) mucosal ulcers. One arterial blowout occurred after a G5 mucosal toxicity., Conclusions: A-DPBN resulted in superior 1- and 2-year LC for HNC compared with S-IMRT. This supports further exploration in multicenter phase 3 trials. It will, however, be challenging to recruit a substantial patient sample for such trials, as concerns have arisen regarding the association of late mucosal ulcers when escalating the dose in continuing smokers., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The available data for the safety and efficacy of repeat peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are almost exclusively from European centers. We present an updated experience with repeat PRRT in a cohort of US patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) at our NET center of excellence., Methods: We used our single-center longitudinal NET registry to identify patients who had been previously treated with at least one dose of PRRT (PRRT 1, either 177 Lu DOTATATE or 90 Y DOTATOC) and following radiographic disease progression were re-treated with a second course of PRRT (PRRT 2). We reviewed patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, objective response rates, and toxicities after PRRT 1 and PRRT 2., Results: A total of 11 patients were included in the analysis. 45.5% (5/11) of patients received 177 Lu DOTATATE PRRT only, both for PRRT1 and PRRT 2, while 54.5% (6/11) of patients received 90 Y DOTATOC PRRT for PRRT1. At first restaging scan after PRRT2 (3-6 months), 18.2% (2/11), 36.4% (4/11), and 27.3% (3/11) of patients had PR, SD, and PD, respectively; 2/11 patients (18.2%) died before the first restaging scan. Therefore, 5/11 (45.5%) patients were noted to have disease progression. Median PFS for PRRT1 was 25.4 months and median PFS for PRRT2 was 13.1 months (p = 0.0001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between the occurrence of short and long-term hematological toxicities as well as renal toxicity after PRRT1 and PRRT2., Conclusion: We show that repeat PRRT may benefit select patients and have an acceptable safety profile. In our cohort, PFS was significantly lower after PRRT2 as compared to PRRT1., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is a rapidly growing treatment modality. Though uncommon, patients may experience complications during their RPT treatment, which may trigger a rapid response from the hospital team. However, members of this team are typically not familiar with precautions for radiation safety. During these events, it is important to prioritize the patient's health over all else. There are some practices that can help minimize the risk of radiation contamination spread and exposure to staff while tending to the patient., Methods and Materials: We formed a team to develop a standard protocol for handling patient emergencies during RPT treatment. This team consisted of an authorized user, radiation safety officer, medical physicist, nurse, RPT administration staff, and a quality/safety coordinator. The focus for developing this standardized protocol for RPT patient emergencies was 3-fold: (1) stabilize the patient; (2) reduce radiation exposure to staff; and (3) limit the spread of radiation contamination., Results: We modified our hospital's existing rapid response protocol to account for the additional staff and tasks needed to accomplish all 3 of these goals. Each team member was assigned specific responsibilities, which include serving as a gatekeeper to restrict traffic, managing the crash cart, performing chest compressions, timing chest compressions, documenting the situation, and monitoring/managing radiation safety in the area. We developed a small, easy-to-read card for rapid response staff to read while they are en route to the area so they can be aware of and prepare for the unique circumstances that RPT treatments present., Conclusions: Though rapid response events with RPT patients are uncommon, it is important to have a standardized protocol for how to handle these situations beforehand rather than improvise in the moment. We have provided an example of how our team adapted our hospital's current rapid response protocol to accommodate RPT patients., Competing Interests: Disclosures NMM received travel funds from AAPM for serving as faculty at the AAPM Summer School 2023; JZ serves in leadership roles in the AAPM educational committees and receives complimentary registration to the ASTRO annual meeting for presenting at the ASTRO Master Class on Radiopharmaceutical Therapies; BCB receives consulting fees for Varian, Boston Scientific, Myovant, and Galera Therapeutics/Regeneron, received speaking honoraria from Varian, and used to serve on the board of National Association for Proton Therapy; AM received consulting fees from Novartis; HK has received consulting fees for Novartis; no other authors have anything to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiopharmaceuticals are drugs used in treatment or diagnosis that contain a radioactive part, usually a pharmaceutical part in their structure. Adverse drug reactions are harmful and unexpected responses that occur when administered at normal doses. Although radiopharmaceuticals are regarded as safe medical products, adverse reactions should not be ignored. More serious adverse reactions such as myelosuppression, pleural effusion, and death may develop in therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals due to their use at higher doses than those used in diagnosis. Therefore, monitoring adverse reactions and reporting them to health authorities is important. This review aims to provide information about adverse reactions that may be related to radiopharmaceuticals used in treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of the manuscript entitled “Adverse reactions to therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals” state that there is no declaration of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Local failure rates after treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain high. Efforts to improve local control with a uniform dose escalation or dose escalation to midtreatment positron emission tomography (PET)-avid residual disease have been limited by heightened toxicity. This trial aimed to refine response-based adaptive radiation therapy (RT) and minimize toxicity by incorporating fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) and ventilation-perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging midtreatment., Methods and Materials: A total of 47 patients with stage IIA to III unresectable NSCLC were prospectively enrolled in this single-institution trial (NCT02492867). Patients received concurrent chemoradiation therapy with personalized response-based adaptive RT over 30 fractions incorporating ventilation-perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and FDG-PET. The first 21 fractions (46.2 Gy at 2.2 Gy/fraction) were delivered to the tumor while minimizing the dose to the SPECT-defined functional lung. The plan was then adapted for the final 9 fractions (2.2-3.8 Gy/fraction) up to a total of 80.4 Gy, based on the midtreatment FDG-PET tumor response to escalate the dose to the residual tumor while minimizing the dose to the SPECT-defined functional lung. Nonprogressing patients received consolidative carboplatin, paclitaxel, or durvalumab. The primary endpoint of the study was ≥ grade 2 lung and esophageal toxicities. Secondary endpoints included time to local progression, tumor response, and overall survival., Results: At 1 year posttreatment, the rates of grade 2 and grade 3 pneumonitis were 21.3% and 2.1%, respectively, with no difference in pneumonitis rates among patients who received and did not receive adjuvant durvalumab (P = .74). Although there were no grade 3 esophageal-related toxicities, 66.0% of patients experienced grade 2 esophagitis. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 94.5% (95% CI, 87.4%-100%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 76.7%-100%), respectively. Overall survival was 82.8% (95% CI, 72.6%-94.4%) at 1 year and 62.3% (95% CI, 49.6%-78.3%) at 2 years., Conclusions: Response-based adaptive dose-escalation accounting for tumor change and normal tissue function during treatment provided excellent local control, comparable toxicity to standard chemoradiation therapy, and did not increase toxicity with adjuvant immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with and without macrotrabecular-massive (MTM) subtypes., Materials and Methods: Forty-one consecutive patients with HCC (male, 90.3%; mean age, 65.3 years [SD ± 10.7]) who underwent yttrium-90 TARE between September 2014 and January 2022 were grouped into the MTM-HCC (n = 17, 41.5%) and non-MTM-HCC (n = 24, 58.5%) groups based on their histopathological subtypes. Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics were compared. Survival, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed, and prognostic factors were evaluated., Results: In MTM-HCC group, the rates of moderately to poorly differentiated tumors were significantly higher (13/17 vs 8/16, P = .007), and new intrahepatic/extrahepatic metastases were detected more frequently (12/17 vs 15/24, P = .038). Median overall survival (OS) in the cohort was 29 months (range, 17.1-40.9 months), whereas patients with MTM-HCC had a significantly shorter median OS (20 vs 44 months, P = .014). In univariate analysis, MTM-HCC subtype (hazard ratio [HR], 2.690; P = .021), the presence of satellite nodules (HR, 3.810; P = .004), and macrovascular invasion (HR, 3.321; P = .012) were identified as significant prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, MTM-HCC subtype and macrovascular invasion were determined as independent poor prognostic factors (P = .038 and P = .012, respectively)., Conclusions: In patients with HCC treated with yttrium-90 TARE, both the rates of moderately to poorly differentiated histopathological classes and the development of intrahepatic or extrahepatic metastases were significantly higher in the MTM-HCC subtype. OS was worse in patients with MTM-HCC, and macrovascular invasion and MTM-HCC subtype were identified as independent poor prognostic factors., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of using modified radiation lobectomy (mRL) to treat primary hepatic tumors located in the right hepatic lobe (Segments V-VIII) and to determine future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed at a single institution to include 19 consecutive patients (7 females, 12 males) who underwent single-session mRL for right-sided primary hepatic tumors: 15 received segmentectomy plus lobectomy (segmental dose of >190 Gy and lobar dose of >80 Gy); 4 were treated with the double-segmental approach (dominant segments of >190 Gy and nondominant segments of >80 Gy). Treated tumors included 13 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 4 cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and 2 mixed-type HCC-CCA with a median dominant tumor size of 5.3 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 3.7-7.3 cm). FLR of the left hepatic lobe was measured at baseline, T1 (4-8 weeks), T2 (2-4 months), T3 (4-6 months), and T4 (9-12 months)., Results: Objective tumor response and tumor control were achieved in 17 of the 19 (89.5%) and 18 of the 19 (94.7%) patients, respectively. FLR hypertrophy was observed at T1 (median, 47.8%; P = .025), T2 (median, 48.4%; P = .012), T3 (median, 50.4%; P = .015), and T4 (median, 59.1%; P < .001). Patients without cirrhosis demonstrated greater hypertrophy by 6 months (median, 55.8% vs 47.2%; P = .031). One patient developed a Grade 3 adverse event (ascites requiring paracentesis) at 1-month follow-up. Grade ≥2 serum toxicities were associated with worse baseline Child-Pugh Score, serum albumin, and total bilirubin (P < .05). Among 7 patients who underwent neoadjuvant mRL, 2 underwent resection and 1 received liver transplant., Conclusions: mRL appears safe and effective for treatment of right-sided primary hepatic tumors with the benefit of promoting FLR hypertrophy., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer include use of radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617. 177Lu-PSMA-617 is used to target prostate cancer cells selectively by targeting prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA); however, PSMA is also expressed on lacrimal glands among other tissues. Herein, we report on a case of a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 grade 3 dry eye event with concomitant blepharitis after administration of 177Lu-PSMA-617. The patient was managed with neomycin-polymyxin-dexamethasone 3.5-10000-0.1 ophthalmic suspension, artificial tears, lubricating ointments, lid scrubs, and oral antihistamines., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Prospective results have demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy for up to 6 cycles in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, no systematic data are available outlining the feasibility of extended therapy beyond 6 cycles. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy in patients who have received more than 6 cycles. Methods: In total, 111 patients were included in this multicenter retrospective analysis. Based on individual decisions, patients underwent uninterrupted continuation of therapy (continuous treatment) or reexposure after a therapy break (rechallenge treatment) between 2014 and 2023. Overall survival, 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline (measured 8-12 wk after treatment initiation or rechallenge), PSMA PET response, and grades per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were assessed. χ 2 tests, multivariable Cox regression analysis, and log-rank tests were applied for statistical analyses. Results: Patients received extended treatment with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA, either as a continuous treatment (43/111, 38.7%) or as a rechallenge (68/111, 61.3%) treatment, with median cumulative doses of 57.4 or 60.8 GBq, respectively. Overall survival from the initiation of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA was 31.3, 23.2, and 40.2 mo for the entire cohort, the continuous treatment group, and the rechallenge treatment group, respectively. The initial 50% PSA decline was significantly higher in the retreated group than in the continuous group (57/63 [90.4%] vs. 26/42 [61.9%]; P = 0.006). A 50% PSA decline was observed in 23 of 62 patients (37.1%) after the first rechallenge. The rate of grades 3-4 toxicity was comparable between continuous and rechallenge treatments (anemia, 7/43 [16.3%] vs. 13/68 [19.1%)], P = 0.6; leukocytopenia, 1/43 [2.3%] vs. 2/67 [3.0%], P = 0.3; thrombocytopenia, 3/43 [7.0%] vs. 3/68 [4.4%], P = 0.3; renal, 2/43 [4.7%] vs. 5/68 [7.4%], P = 0.2). Conclusion: Extended therapy with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA is safe and has not been associated with increased grades 3-4 toxicity. Patient candidates for extended treatment experienced a favorable median survival of 31.3 mo from the first administration. Response under [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA rechallenge demonstrated preserved efficacy of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA after a treatment break., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Background/aim: The current systematic review aimed to collect and analyze all available published and unpublished cases in which prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy ( 177 Lu-PSMA) was used to treat non-prostatic cancer., Materials and Methods: Literature search and evidence acquisition through contacts with organizations that use 177 Lu-PSMA were employed. PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and ScienceDirect searches were performed following PRISMA recommendations. The search strategy was to screen all articles describing 177 Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy published to date with the key word " 177 Lu-PSMA". These articles were collected and screened for non-prostatic cancer cases. Quality assessment was performed using the GRADE criteria., Results: A total of 713 articles were screened, and the search revealed 15 eligible records. Forty patients with a mean age of 51.2±18.5 years were treated with 177 Lu-PSMA for non-prostatic cancer. Of them, 30 cases were published, and 10 were found in medical institution records. Cancers of the salivary glands were most often targeted (13/40), followed by various brain cancer types (8/40), and osteosarcoma (6/40). The authors used previously established protocols for castration-resistant prostate cancer with the dose per cycle as 6.0-7.4 GBq and the number of cycles between one and four. Toxicity was estimated as low, and 21 out of 28 patients with reported outcomes survived to the time of the publication., Conclusion: PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy was infrequently used to treat different non-prostatic cancer types in various target organs. These pioneering efforts indicate that 177 Lu-PSMA can be used to treat non-prostatic cancer with PSMA expression. The toxicity of such treatment was low, and the outcome was relatively good., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Introduction: [ 177 Lu]Lutetium (Lu)-oxodotreotide is a radiopharmaceutical drug used as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine neoplasms. It provides an additional effective alternative treatment for these rare cancers. Although well tolerated, its safety profile must continue to be characterized to support its use as a first-line treatment or for additional cycles. This study evaluated factors associated with the occurrence of [ 177 Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide induced short-term toxicity. Ma terials and Methods: A retrospective observational monocentric study was carried out from July 2013 to October 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: patients who received at least four cycles of [ 177 Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide and were followed up for 6 months after the last injection. Graduated toxicity was defined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0. Cox regression was used in the analysis. Results: Forty patients were included. The most frequent toxicities occurred during the first cycle and were graded as G1 or G2. As expected, toxicities were predominantly hematological and hepatic, with incomplete reversibility after each cycle. The following factors were significantly related to the occurrence of hematological or hepatic toxicity during PRRT: gastrointestinal primary tumor diagnosis, bone metastases, peritoneal metastases, pancreatic metastases or pulmonary metastases, and high tumor grade. Conclusion: Knowledge and consideration of these factors in adjusting [ 177 Lu]Lu-oxodotreotide treatment regimen could help prevent or reduce the severity of these toxicities. Further studies are still warranted to refine these results and improve treatment management.

Peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-dotatate is widely used for the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We analyzed data from 104 patients with NETs treated with 177Lu -dotatate at a US academic center between December 2017 and October 2020 to better understand patterns of long-term efficacy, safety, and toxicity in the real-world setting. 177Lu-dotatate (200 mCi) was administered every eight weeks for four doses. The most common sites of primary disease were small intestine NETs (n = 49, 47%), pancreatic NETs (n = 32, 31%), and lung NETs (n = 7, 7%). Twenty-seven percent had Ki-67 <3%, 49% had Ki-67 between 3-20%, and 13.5% had Ki-67 >20%. The cohort had been pretreated with a median of two prior lines of treatment. Forty percent had received prior liver-directed treatment. Seventy-four percent of patients completed all four doses of treatment. The objective response rate was 18%. The median time-to-treatment failure/death was significantly longer for small-bowel NETs when compared to pancreatic NETs (37.3 months vs. 13.2 months, p = 0.001). In a multivariate model, Ki-67, primary site, and liver tumor burden ≥50% were found to independently predict time-to-treatment failure/death. Around 40% of patients experienced adverse events of ≥grade 3 severity. Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy happened in 10% of patients. Preexisting mesenteric/peritoneal disease was present in 33 patients; seven of these patients developed bowel-related toxicities including two grade 5 events. We also report two cases of delayed-onset minimal change nephrotic syndrome, which occurred 14 and 27 months after the last dose of PRRT. Lastly, we describe six patients who developed rapid tumor progression in the liver leading to terminal liver failure within 7.3 months from the start of PRRT, and identify potential risk factors associated with this occurrence, which will need further study., Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following competing interests: Vineeth Sukrithan has received clinical research, on behalf of Ohio State University, funding from Eli Lilly and Company and Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, as well as consulting fees from GE Oncology, Exelixis, and Lantheus. Bhavana Konda has received grant funding, on behalf of Ohio State University, from Xencor, Merck, and Eisai., (Copyright: © 2024 Sukrithan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Purpose: To identify factors of incomplete treatment after segmental transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for treatment-naive and solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Materials and Methods: A total of 75 consecutive patients (age, 68.5 years [SD ± 8.0]; 25/75 [33.3%] women) with treatment-naive, solitary HCC underwent segmental or subsegmental TARE with glass microspheres (tumor size, 3.8 cm [SD ± 2.2]; administered dose, 222.6 Gy [SD ± 123.9]) at a single institution from November 2015 to June 2022. Radiologic response and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed as per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors., Results: Complete treatment was achieved in 48 of 75 (64.0%) patients (mean follow-up, 33.2 months [SD ± 27.4]). Patients with incomplete treatment (27/75, 36%) presented with larger tumor size (5.0 [SD ± 2.5] vs 3.1 [SD ± 1.6] cm; P = .0001), with more tumors located in the watershed zone (81.5% vs 41.7%; P = .001). These patients were less likely to be bridged to transplant or resection (22.2% vs 52.1%; P = .015). Watershed tumors demonstrated worse target tumor PFS (median PFS, 19 months vs not reached; P = .0104) and overall PFS (9.1 months vs not reached; P = .0077). Watershed location was associated with worse PFS among tumors >3 cm in size (8.4 months vs not reached; P = .035) but not in tumors ≤3 cm in size (52.2 months vs not reached; P = .915)., Conclusions: Tumor size and watershed location were associated with incomplete treatment after segmental TARE for HCC. Watershed tumors were associated with worse PFS, particularly tumors larger than 3 cm. These tumors may require careful treatment planning and repeated treatments to ensure a durable response., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We report our initial real-world experience with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617. Pretreatment PSMA PET, laboratory findings, overall survival, a fall in prostate-specific antigen by 50% (PSA50), and toxicities were evaluated. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included. Sixty patients achieved a PSA50. Seven of 18 (39%) patients who did not meet the TheraP PSMA imaging criteria achieved a PSA50. Nineteen of 31 (61%) patients who did not meet the VISION laboratory criteria achieved a PSA50. Sixty-three patients had a delay or stoppage in therapy, which was due to a good response in 19 patients and progressive disease in 14 patients. Of 10 patients with a good response who restarted treatment, 9 subsequently achieved a PSA50 on retreatment. The most common toxicities were anemia (33%) and thrombocytopenia (21%). Conclusion: At our center, patients who did not meet the TheraP PSMA imaging criteria or the VISION laboratory criteria benefited from 177 Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Purpose: To characterize estimated mean absorbed tumor dose (AD T ), objective response (OR), and estimated target dose of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resin microsphere yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) radioembolization using partition dosimetry., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, multicompartment dosimetry of index tumors receiving 90 Y radioembolization between October 2015 and June 2022 was performed using a commercial software package and pretreatment technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT). In total, 101 patients with HCC underwent 102 treatments of 127 index tumors. Patients underwent imaging every 2-3 months after treatment to determine best response per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Best response was defined as the greatest response category per mRECIST and categorized as OR or nonresponse (NR). A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the probability of tumor OR and progression-free survival using AD T ., Results: The median follow-up period was 148 days (interquartile range [IQR], 92-273 days). The median AD T of OR was 141.9 Gy (IQR, 89.4-215.8 Gy) compared with the median AD T of NR treatments of 70.8 Gy (IQR, 42.0-135.3 Gy; P < .001). Only AD T was predictive of response (hazard ratio = 2.79 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.44-5.40]; P = .003). At 6 months, an AD T of 157 Gy predicted 90.0% (95% CI: 41.3%-98.3%) probability of OR. At 1 year, an AD T of 157 Gy predicted 91.6% (95% CI: 78.3%-100%) probability of progression-free survival. Partition modeling and delivered activity were predictive of progression (P = .021 and P = .003, respectively)., Conclusions: For HCC treated with resin microspheres, tumors receiving higher AD T exhibited higher rates of OR. An AD T of 157 Gy predicted 90.0% OR at 6 months., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To characterize estimated mean tumor-absorbed dose (AD T ) and objective response of metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) after resin microsphere yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) hepatic radioembolization using partition dosimetry., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, multicompartment dosimetry of index tumors receiving 90 Y radioembolization between 2013 and 2022 involved the use of Sureplan (MIM Software, Cleveland, Ohio) and technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with computed tomography. Thirty-six patients with NET underwent treatment of 56 index tumors. Patients underwent imaging every 3-6 months after treatment to determine best response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria. Responses were categorized as objective response (OR) or nonresponse (NR). Wilcoxon rank sum test evaluated differences in continuous variables, and Pearson χ 2 test evaluated differences in categorical variables., Results: Median follow-up was 582 days (IQR, 187-1,227 days). Per RECIST 1.1, 27 patients (75%) experienced OR and 9 patients experienced (25%) NR. Of the 36 patients, 33 (92%) showed hypervascular, mRECIST-evaluable tumors. Among them, 28 patients (85%) showed mRECIST OR and 5 patients (15%) showed NR. The mRECIST OR group received a higher AD T than the NR group (median, 107 Gy; IQR, 95.1-154 Gy vs median, 70.4 Gy; IQR, 62.9-87.6 Gy; P = .048). All tumors receiving at least 120 Gy showed mRECIST OR., Conclusions: In hypervascular metastatic NET treated by 90 Y resin microsphere radioembolization, higher tumor dose was associated with better tumor response per mRECIST. Doses of ≥120 Gy led to OR., (Copyright © 2023 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Whilst prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer globally, effective therapies for patients with advanced disease are lacking. In recent years, interest in using theranostic agents to treat castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic prostate cancer has emerged. Lu-TLX591 monoclonal antibody is a potential agent of significance; however, to date, reports on its toxicity and efficacy have been limited to small clinical trials in heavily pretreated patients. This retrospective study describes the real-world toxicity and efficacy profile of Lu-TLX591., Methods: Eighteen patients received Lu-TLX591 at two private oncology centres in Australia. Patients were eligible if they had CRPC or metastatic prostate cancer and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-avid disease confirmed by PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET). Patients received two cycles of Lu-TLX591 monoclonal antibody (177 Lu-DOTA-rosopatamab) each dosed from 1.01-2.85 GBq, 14 days apart. Patient side effects, blood test results and radiology reports were recorded on the patient's electronic medical record (eMR)., Results: Prominent side effects included fatigue (55.6%), anorexia (16.7%), nausea (11.1%), and transfusion reactions (11.1%). All-grade haematological toxicities included lymphopenia (61.1%), anaemia (22.2%), leukopenia (27.8%), neutropenia (27.8%), and thrombocytopenia (27.8%). Grade 4 toxicity included lymphopenia (6.7%) and thrombocytopenia (6.7%). Patients' prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were as follows; ≥ 30% PSA decline (27.8%), ≥ 50% PSA decline (11.4%) and any PSA decline (38.9%). Follow-up radiology revealed 54.5% stable disease, 45.4% disease progression and 9.1% disease regression., Conclusion: Lu-TLX591 was safely administered at acceptable toxicity and its efficacy reflects previous clinical trials. Larger studies are required and are underway (NCT04786847; NCT05146973; NCT04876651) to determine Lu-TLX591 effectiveness amongst different prostate cancer populations and compare its efficacy against peptide-based radiopharmaceutical agents., (© 2024. Crown.)

Purpose: To investigate if combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) radioembolization results in superior outcomes than those yielded by tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and 90 Y for the treatment of intermediate- to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: A retrospective review of patients presented at an institutional multidisciplinary liver tumor board between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2023 was conducted. In total, 44 patients with HCC who underwent 90 Y 4 weeks within initiation of ICI or TKI therapy were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to account for baseline demographic differences. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and univariate statistics identified disease response and control rate differences. Duration of imaging response was defined as number of months between the first scan after therapy and the first scan showing progression as defined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) or immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST). Adverse events were analyzed per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0., Results: Patients in the 90 Y+ICI therapy group had better objective response rates (ORRs) (89.5% vs 36.8%; P < .001) and disease control rates (DCRs) (94.7% vs 63.2%; P < .001) by mRECIST and iRECIST (ORR: 78.9% vs 36.8%; P < .001; DCR: 94.7% vs 63.2%; P < .001). Median PFS (8.3 vs 4.1 months; P = .37) and OS (15.8 vs 14.3 months; P = .52) were not statistically different. Twelve patients (63.1%) in the 90 Y+TKI group did not complete systemic therapy owing to adverse effects compared with 1 patient (5.3%) in the 90 Y+ICI group (P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events were not statistically different ( 90 Y+TKI: 21.1%; 90 Y+ICI: 5.3%; P = .150)., Conclusions: Patients with HCC who received 90 Y+ICI had better imaging response and fewer regimen-altering adverse events than those who received 90 Y+TKI. No significant combination therapy adverse events were attributable to radioembolization., (Copyright © 2024 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: 99m Tc-Maraciclatide is a radiolabelled RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptide that binds with high affinity to α v β 3 and α v β 5 integrins, common receptors upregulated in disease states involving angiogenesis and inflammation. As such, it holds promise as a novel diagnostic imaging agent for a range of pathological conditions. The present study provides the safety, biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 99m Tc-maraciclatide in healthy volunteers., Methods: A phase 1, randomised, placebo-controlled study assessed the safety, biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 99m Tc-maraciclatide in healthy volunteers. Participants were randomised into three groups receiving 99m Tc-maraciclatide and three chemical amounts of maraciclatide in an escalating dose protocol. Eight participants in each group received the required amount of maraciclatide via intravenous injection, with the remaining two receiving a placebo. Biodistribution was assessed by acquiring scintigraphic images at time points up to 24 h after a bolus injection of 99m Tc-maraciclatide. 99m Tc-maraciclatide activity in plasma and urine was measured up to 7 days post-administration., Results: 99m Tc-maraciclatide was safe and well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. Initial uptakes of 99m Tc were highest in the gastrointestinal tract (20%), liver (15%), and lungs (9%). Similarly, the regions with the highest normalised cumulated activities were the contents of the urinary bladder and voided urine (3.4 ± 0.4 MBq*h/MBq), the combined walls of the small intestine and upper and lower large intestine (0.9 ± 0.2 MBq*h/MBq), liver (0.8 ± 0.2 MBq*h/MBq), lung (0.4 ± 0.1 MBq*h/MBq). The main route of 99m Tc excretion was renal (55%), with a systemic urinary clearance of approximately 6.7 ml/min/kg. The pharmacokinetic analysis gave a mean apparent terminal elimination half-life of the unlabelled molecular maraciclatide of approximately 1 h, independent of dose. The mean ED per unit injected activity was 7.8 ± 0.8 µSv/MBq., Conclusion: 99m Tc-maraciclatide is a safe radiopharmaceutical formulation with a dosimetry profile similar to other 99m Tc-based imaging agents., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background and Objective: [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ( 177 Lu-PSMA-617) plus the standard of care (SoC) significantly improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival versus SoC alone in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the VISION trial. We evaluated the safety of additional cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 and the impact of longer observation time for patients receiving 177 Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC., Methods: VISION was an international, open-label study. Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive 177 Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC or SoC alone. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was assessed in prespecified subgroups of patients who received ≤4 cycles versus 5-6 cycles of treatment and during each cycle of treatment. The TEAE incidence was also adjusted for treatment exposure to calculate the incidence per 100 patient-treatment years of observation. This analysis was performed for the first occurrence of TEAEs., Key Findings and Limitations: The any-grade TEAE incidence was similar in cycles 1-4 and cycles 5-6. TEAE frequency was similar across all cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. No additional safety concerns were reported for patients who received >4 cycles. The exposure-adjusted safety analysis revealed that the overall TEAE incidence was similar between arms, but distinct trends for different TEAE types were noted and the incidence of events associated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 remained higher in the 177 Lu-PSMA-617 arm., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Longer exposure to 177 Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC was not associated with a higher toxicity risk, and the extended time for safety observation could account for the higher TEAE incidence in comparison to SoC alone. The findings support a favourable benefit-risk profile for 6 cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in this setting and the use of up to 6 cycles of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in patients who are clinically benefiting from and tolerating this therapy., Patient Summary: For patients with metastatic prostate cancer no longer responding to hormone therapy, an increase in the number of cycles of treatment with a radioactive compound called 177 Lu-PSMA-617 from four to six had no additional adverse side effects., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We present the case of a patient with heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received lutetium Lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan (also known as 177 Lu-PSMA-617) due to progressive disease despite chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and radiation, including palliative mediastinal and central nervous system radiation. He was subsequently hospitalised for worsening acute onset dyspnoea despite clinically responding to therapy. Interval imaging revealed progressive multifocal ground-glass opacities superimposed on a background of underlying peribronchovascular fibrosis. Further workup, including an extensive workup to identify a possible infectious aetiology, ruled out most aetiologies leaving radiation pneumonitis (RP), radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) and drug-induced pneumonitis as possible diagnoses secondary to 177 Lu -PSMA-617. The associated imaging findings of ground-glass opacities and consolidation can be like other aetiologies such as acute infection and subsequently may be treated incorrectly. In the use of theragnostics like 177 Lu -PSMA-617, it is fundamental to apply the practices of radioprotection learnt from radiotherapy, as well as to consider prior radiotherapy treatments and their possible side effects when used in conjunction., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Andrew Armstrong receives consulting income (personal) and grant funding (to Duke University) from Novartis., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Despite advancements in managing metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) through antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, there remains a demand for novel treatments for patients experiencing progression despite the use of these medications. There is currently no established standard treatment for patients receiving third therapy line. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma is also highly expressed in neovessels of various solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC): 86% of clear cell RCC, 61% of chromophobe RCC, and 28% of papillary RCC. Therefore, PSMA may be a target expressed in metastatic ccRCC for radionuclide therapy using PSMA ligands radiolabeled with Lutetium-177 (PRLT). 177 Lu-PSMA delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment with demonstrated efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer., Methods: This is a multicenter phase I/II study designed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in individuals with PSMA-positive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), identified through 68Ga-PSMA PET, conducted in France (PRadR). 48 patients will be treated with 4 cycles of 7.4 GBq of 177 Lu-PSMA-1 every 6 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of 177 Lu-PSMA-1 (phase I) and the efficacy of 177 Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (phase II). Primary endpoints are incidence of Severe Toxicities (ST) occurring during the first cycle (i.e. 6 first weeks) and disease Control Rate after 24 weeks of treatment (DCR24w) as per RECIST V1.1. Secondary objective is to further document the clinical activity of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (duration of response (DoR), best overall response rate (BORR), progression fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Discussion: Our prospective study may lead to new potential indications for the use of 177 Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients and should confirm the efficacy and safety of this radionuclide therapy with limited adverse events. The use of 177 Lu-PSMA-1may lead to increase disease control, objective response rate and the quality of life in mccRCC patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06059014., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Life expectancy of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is still limited despite several systemic treatments. Within five years after diagnosis of primary prostate cancer, 10-20% of the patients have mCRPC and curation is not an option. Radionuclide therapy (RNT) targeted against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) emerged as a new treatment option and showed effective results in patients with mCRPC. Survival benefit after [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA RNT has already been demonstrated in several clinical trials. However, [ 225 Ac]Ac-PSMA ( 225 Ac-PSMA) appears to be an even more promising radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of mCRPC. The use of alpha emitting radionuclides offers advantages over beta emitting radionuclides due to the high linear energy transfer effective for killing tumor cells and the limited range to reduce the radiation effects on the healthy tissue. However, these results are based on retrospective data and safety data of 225 Ac-PSMA are still limited. Therefore, a prospective trial is needed to determine the optimal amount of activity that can be administered., Methods: The 225 Ac-PSMA-Imaging & Therapy (I&T) trial is an investigator-initiated phase I, single-center, open label, repeated dose-escalation and expansion trial. Patient with PSMA-positive mCRPC after at least one line of chemotherapy and/or one line of nonsteroidal antiandrogen will be treated with 225 Ac-PSMA-I&T in increasing amount of activity per cycle. Dose-escalation following an accelerated 3 + 3 design which allows to open the next dose-level cohort in the absence of dose limiting toxicity while the previous one is still ongoing. Up to 4 treatment cohorts will be explored including up to 3 dose-escalation cohorts and one expansion cohort where patients will be administered with the recommended dose. A total of up to 30 patients will be enrolled in this trial. All patients will be evaluated for safety. Additionally, dosimetry was performed for the patients in the dose-escalation cohorts after the first 225 Ac-PSMA-I&T administration., Discussion: This trial will assess the safety and tolerability of 225 Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC to recommend the optimal dose for the phase II trial., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT05902247). Retrospectively registered 13 June 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the VISION trial, [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ( 177 Lu-PSMA-617) plus protocol-permitted standard of care significantly improved overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival compared with standard of care alone in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This VISION dosimetry substudy quantified absorbed doses of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in the kidneys and other organs. Methods: Participants were a separate cohort of 30 nonrandomized patients receiving standard of care plus 177 Lu-PSMA-617 at 7.4 GBq per cycle for up to 6 cycles. Blood samples, whole-body conjugate planar image scintigraphy, and abdominal SPECT/CT images were collected. SPECT/CT images were collected at 2, 24, 48, and 168 h after administration in cycle 1 and at a single time point 48 h after administration in cycles 2-6. Outcomes were absorbed dose per unit activity per cycle and cumulative absorbed dose over all cycles. Cumulative absorbed doses were predicted by extrapolation from cycle 1, and calculation of observed values was based on measurements of cycle 1 and cycles 2-6. Safety was also assessed. Results: Mean (±SD) absorbed doses per cycle in the kidneys were 0.43 ± 0.16 Gy/GBq in cycle 1 and 0.44 ± 0.21 Gy/GBq in cycles 2-6. The observed and predicted 6-cycle cumulative absorbed doses in the kidneys were 15 ± 6 and 19 ± 7 Gy, respectively. Observed and predicted cumulative absorbed doses were similar in other at-risk organs. Safety findings were consistent with those in the VISION study; no patients experienced renal treatment-emergent adverse events of a grade higher than 3. Conclusion: The renal cumulative absorbed 177 Lu-PSMA-617 dose was below the established limit. 177 Lu-PSMA-617 had a good overall safety profile, and low renal radiotoxicity was not a safety concern. Cumulative absorbed doses in at-risk organs over multiple cycles can be predicted by extrapolation from cycle 1 data in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving 177 Lu-PSMA-617., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Purpose: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a targeted molecular therapy used to treat neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). It has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic NETs in several centres in the USA, Europe, and Australia. Tolerability and efficacy data emerging from Asian centres remain few. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there are differences in neuroendocrine neoplasms between the population groups. We aim to describe the treatment and safety outcomes of PRRT in the Asian population., Methods: One hundred and seven (107) patients with metastatic NETs who had undergone PRRT treatment from January 2012 to March 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The response rates using RECIST 1.1 and qualitative analysis were examined. The overall and progression-free survival curves were also evaluated., Results: The median progression-free survival was 49 months. Response assessment after completion of treatment showed that 33 (37.9%) of 87 patients had partial or complete response. Subgroup analysis comparing high- and low-grade NET showed that there was a significant difference in the time to progression curves. Comparison of the number of cycles and progression-free and overall survival also showed a significant difference. Ten patients (9%) had grade 3 or more haematological toxicities. Four patients (4%) had grade 3/4 hepatobiliary toxicities, although the presence of extensive liver metastases was a confounding factor. None of the patients had grade 3/4 acute kidney injury., Conclusion: Our results show that PRRT is safe and effective in the treatment of metastatic NET in the Asian population. There was a significant difference in the progression-free survival curves between low-grade and high-grade NET and in the progression-free and overall survival comparing the number of cycles received., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

This survey was performed in order to investigate the incidence of adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals in FY2022 in Japan. It was based on responses to questionnaires sent to nuclear medicine institutions. Replies were obtained from 1,004 institutions out of 1,181 to which the questionnaire had been sent. A total of 911,977 radiopharmaceutical administrations were reported. Seventeen cases of adverse reactions were reported. The incidence of adverse reactions per 100,000 cases was 1.9 . No case of defective products was reported.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of 177 Lutetium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen ( 177 Lu-PSMA-617) radioligand treatment (RLT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with aged older than 75 years., Methods: A total of 37 patients with mCRPC aged older than 75 years treated with 177 Lu- PSMA-617 were included in this study. Pre-therapy and post-therapy biochemical, metabolic, and clinical response results and Hb, TLC, platelet, serum creatinine and bilirubin levels were checked to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity profile. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was used for grading adverse events caused by 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment., Results: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 79.8±2.9 (76-92). The number of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment cycles ranged from two to four, and the mean administered radioactivity dose was 5.6±0.8 GBq per cycle. Partial biochemical response (PR) and partial metabolic response (PMR) were observed in 11 (29.7%) and 15 (40.6%) patients after treatment, respectively. Although improvement in ECOG scores was observed in 5 (13.5%) patients after treatment, it was not statistically significant. Grade 2 and 3 Hb toxicity was observed in 10 (27%) and 2 (5.4%) patients, respectively. Grade 2 leukocytopenia in six patients, Grade 1 thrombocytopenia in six patients, and Grade 2 serum creatinine toxicity in five patients were seen after the treatment. On the other hand, no patients developed liver toxicity and grade 3 or 4 leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia or creatinine toxicity., Conclusion: 177 Lu-PSMA-617 treatment was a safe and effective treatment option for properly selected elderly mCRPC patients., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Purpose: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a promising target for tumor treatment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the albumin binder-conjugated FAP-targeted radiopharmaceutical, 177Lu-EB-FAPI (177Lu-LNC1004), in patients with metastatic radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (mRAIR-TC)., Patients and Methods: This open-label, non-randomized, first-in-human, dose-escalation, investigator-initiated trial had a 3+3 design and involved a 6-week 177Lu-LNC1004 treatment cycle in patients with mRAIR-TC at 2.22 GBq initially, with subsequent cohorts receiving an incremental 50% dose increase until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed., Results: 177Lu-LNC1004 administration was well tolerated, with no life-threatening adverse events observed. No patients experienced DLT in Group A (2.22 GBq/cycle). One patient experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia in Group B (3.33 GBq/cycle); hence, another three patients were enrolled, none of whom experienced DLT. Two patients experienced grade 3 and 4 hematotoxicity in Group C (4.99 GBq/cycle). The mean whole-body effective dose was 0.17 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq. Intense 177Lu-LNC1004 uptake and prolonged tumor retention resulted in high mean absorbed tumor doses (8.50 ± 12.36 Gy/GBq). The mean effective half-lives for the whole-body and tumor lesions were 90.20 ± 7.68 and 92.46 ± 9.66 hours, respectively. According to RECIST, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 3 (25%), 7 (58%), and 2 (17%) patients, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were 25% and 83%, respectively., Conclusions: FAP-targeted radioligand therapy with 177Lu-LNC1004 at 3.33 GBq/cycle was well tolerated in patients with advanced mRAIR-TC, with high radiation dose delivery to the tumor lesions, encouraging therapeutic efficacy, and acceptable side effects., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: 131I-MIP-1095 is a targeted radiotherapeutic that contains 131I, a β-particle emitter, and MIP-1095, a urea-based ligand for prostate-specific membrane antigen. We report the first phase 1, dose-escalation study of 131I-MIP-1095 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Methods: This study enrolled men with mCRPC refractory to second-generation antiandrogen(s) and taxane chemotherapy. Dosimetry/biodistribution assessments were performed. Safety and tolerability were determined in subjects who qualified for therapeutic administration of 131I-MIP-1095 with maximum tolerated activity examined in a dose-ascending manner (3 + 3 design methodology). Disease outcomes including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change, tumor response, survival, and circulating tumor cell concentration were assessed., Results: A total of 9 subjects with mCRPC were included in this study. On the basis of dosimetry results, 5 of 9 patients were treated: 3 in cohort 1 (50 mCi) and 2 in cohort 2 (75 mCi). Accrual stopped at the cohort 2 activity level in response to the US Food and Drug Administration mandate for 131I-MIP-1095 manufacturing concerns. Parotid/salivary glands (3.5 Gy/Bq), liver (2.2 Gy/Bq), kidneys (1.3 Gy/Bq), and spleen (0.7 Gy/Bq) demonstrated the greatest extent of 131I-MIP-1095 exposure. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or drug discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events. Grade 1-2 thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, and dry mouth most commonly occurred. One subject (33.3%) exhibited maximum decline for the PSA response of 50% or greater., Conclusion: 131I-MIP-1095 demonstrated favorable dosimetry, biodistribution, and safety, as well as a modest PSA response supporting further investigation for treatment of men with mCRPC.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03030885, Registered January 25, 2017 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03030885)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: Funding was provided by Progenics Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

177 Lu-PSMA-617 and 177 Lu-PSMA I&T (collectively termed 177 Lu-PSMA) are currently being used for the treatment of selected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with PSMA PET-positive disease, but biomarkers for these agents remain incompletely understood. Methods: Pretreatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples were collected from 44 mCRPC patients receiving 177 Lu-PSMA treatment. Prostate-specific antigen responders and nonresponders were assessed relative to the ctDNA findings at baseline. Results: The ctDNA findings indicated that nonresponders were more likely to have gene amplifications than were responders (75% vs. 39.2%, P = 0.03). In particular, amplifications in FGFR1 (25% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and CCNE1 (31.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.001) were more likely to be present in nonresponders. CDK12 mutations were more likely to be present in nonresponders (25% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: Our analyses indicate that ctDNA assays may contain specific biomarkers predictive of response or resistance for 177 Lu-PSMA-treated mCRPC patients. Additional confirmatory studies are required before clinicians can use these findings to make personalized treatment decisions., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

A single-institution prospective pilot clinical trial was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of combining [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Methods: Six patients with 9 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive oligometastases received 2 cycles of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT followed by SBRT. After the first intravenous infusion of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (7.46 ± 0.15 GBq), patients underwent SPECT/CT at 3.2 ± 0.5, 23.9 ± 0.4, and 87.4 ± 12.0 h. Voxel-based dosimetry was performed with calibration factors (11.7 counts per second/MBq) and recovery coefficients derived from in-house phantom experiments. Lesions were segmented on baseline PSMA PET/CT (50% SUV max ). After a second cycle of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (44 ± 3 d; 7.50 ± 0.10 GBq) and an interim PSMA PET/CT scan, SBRT (27 Gy in 3 fractions) was delivered to all PSMA-avid oligometastatic sites, followed by post-PSMA PET/CT. RPT and SBRT voxelwise dose maps were scaled (α/β = 3 Gy; repair half-time, 1.5 h) to calculate the biologically effective dose (BED). Results: All patients completed the combination therapy without complications. No grade 3+ toxicities were noted. The median of the lesion SUV max as measured on PSMA PET was 16.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 11.6) (baseline), 6.2 (IQR, 2.7) (interim), and 2.9 (IQR, 1.4) (post). PET-derived lesion volumes were 0.4-1.7 cm 3 The median lesion-absorbed dose (AD) from the first cycle of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT (AD RPT ) was 27.7 Gy (range, 8.3-58.2 Gy; corresponding to 3.7 Gy/GBq, range, 1.1-7.7 Gy/GBq), whereas the median lesion AD from SBRT was 28.1 Gy (range, 26.7-28.8 Gy). Spearman rank correlation, ρ, was 0.90 between the baseline lesion PET SUV max and SPECT SUV max ( P = 0.005), 0.74 ( P = 0.046) between the baseline PET SUV max and the lesion AD RPT , and -0.81 ( P = 0.022) between the lesion AD RPT and the percent change in PET SUV max (baseline to interim). The median for the lesion BED from RPT and SBRT was 159 Gy (range, 124-219 Gy). ρ between the BED from RPT and SBRT and the percent change in PET SUV max (baseline to post) was -0.88 ( P = 0.007). Two cycles of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT contributed approximately 40% to the maximum BED from RPT and SBRT. Conclusion: Lesional dosimetry in patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer undergoing [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT followed by SBRT is feasible. Combined RPT and SBRT may provide an efficient method to maximize the delivery of meaningful doses to oligometastatic disease while addressing potential microscopic disease reservoirs and limiting the dose exposure to normal tissues., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Abstract: Many parenteral radiopharmaceuticals available as anticancer therapy are filtered by the kidneys and excreted in the urine. Here, physician leaders of radiation medicine, nuclear medicine/molecular imaging, and the radiotheranostics programs as well as radiation safety officers, collaborated to develop a decision-making guideline for the administration of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in patients with pretherapy or day-of-treatment incontinence. We discussed challenges and opportunities in the screening of patients in urine collection strategies according to grade of urinary incontinence and in subsequent coordination of care. Lutetium-177 ( 177 Lu)-based radiopharmaceutical therapies provided clinical examples of how our procedures were operationalized. Our key management issues of urinary incontinence were cutaneous radiation injury and redness, infection, or pain. In response, we developed clinical practice guidelines for the recognition and management of incontinence-related adverse events. Common adverse events of urinary incontinence were noted in this study. Our how-to guideline for the safe administration of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals for patients with urinary incontinence warrants further investigation and should continue to be evaluated across all radiopharmaceutical therapy agents., (Copyright © 2023 Health Physics Society.)

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer are more likely than other groups to present for radiopharmaceutical therapy with urinary incontinence due to complications from prior local prostate cancer treatment. A consequence of urinary incontinence in patients receiving radiopharmaceutical therapy is the potential production of contaminated solid waste, which must be managed by the licensee and, at home, managed by and disposed of by the patient. Prolonging the patient stay in the treating facility after radiopharmaceutical therapy administration, until the first urinary void or potentially overnight, may moderately reduce the quantity of contaminated waste being managed by the patient at home. However, this approach does not fully mitigate the need for a patient waste-management strategy. In this brief communication, the relative radiation safety merits of contaminated waste disposal in the normal household waste stream in comparison to other waste management strategies are evaluated., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

153 Sm-DOTMP (CycloSam ® ) is a newly-patented radiopharmaceutical for bone tumor treatment. DOTMP (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetramethylene-phosphonate) is a macrocyclic chelating agent with superior binding properties to 153 Sm when compared with EDTMP (Quadramet™, used for palliative treatment of bone cancer). CycloSam ® was administered at 1 mCi/kg (37 MBq/kg) in a prospective pilot study to seven dogs with bone cancer resulting in no myelosuppression. Then, 13 dogs were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial study using traditional 3+3 dose escalation and starting at 1.5 mCi/kg. Baseline evaluation included hematologic and biochemical testing, diagnosis confirmation, thoracic and limb radiographs, technetium-99 m-HDP bone scintigraphy, and 18 F-FDG PET scan (SUVmax). Toxicity (primary endpoint) was assessed through weekly blood counts and adverse events. Dogs received 1.5 mCi/kg (n = 4), 1.75 mCi/kg (n = 6), and 2 mCi/kg (n = 3) of 153 Sm-DOTMP. Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were seen at 2 mCi/kg. No dose-limiting nonhematologic toxicities occurred. Efficacy (secondary endpoint) was assessed by objective lameness measurement (body-mounted inertial sensors), owner quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire, and repeat PET scan. Objective lameness measurement improved in four dogs (53%-60% decrease) was equivocal in three dogs, and worsened in four dogs (66%-115% increase); two dogs were not evaluable. Repeat 18 F-FDG PET scan results varied and change in lameness did not consistently correlate with SUVmax changes. QoL score worsened (n = 5) or was improved/stable (n = 7). Carboplatin chemotherapy (300 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks ×4) started 4 weeks after 153 Sm-DOTMP injection. No dog died of chemotherapy-related complications. All dogs completed study monitoring. The recommended dose for CycloSam ® in dogs is 1.75 mCi/kg, which resulted in some pain control with minimal toxicity and was safely combined with chemotherapy., (© 2023 The Authors. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Radiology.)

Auger electron (AE) radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) may have the same therapeutic efficacy as α-particles for oncologic small disease, with lower risks of normal-tissue toxicity. The seeds of using AE emitters for RPT were planted several decades ago. Much knowledge has been gathered about the potency of the biologic effects caused by the intense shower of these low-energy AEs. Given their short range, AEs deposit much of their energy in the immediate vicinity of their site of decay. However, the promise of AE RPT has not yet been realized, with few agents evaluated in clinical trials and none becoming part of routine treatment so far. Instigated by the 2022 "Technical Meeting on Auger Electron Emitters for Radiopharmaceutical Developments" at the International Atomic Energy Agency, this review presents the current status of AE RPT based on the discussions by experts in the field. A scoring system was applied to illustrate hurdles in the development of AE RPT, and we present a selected list of well-studied and emerging AE-emitting radionuclides. Based on the number of AEs and other emissions, physical half-life, radionuclide production, radiochemical approaches, dosimetry, and vector availability, recommendations are put forward to enhance and impact future efforts in AE RPT research., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed by the majority of clinically significant prostate adenocarcinomas, and patients with target-positive disease can easily be identified by PSMA PET imaging. Promising results with PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy have already been obtained in early-phase studies using various combinations of targeting molecules and radiolabels. Definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in combination with standard-of-care has been demonstrated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, whose disease had progressed after or during at least one taxane regimen and at least one novel androgen-axis drug. Preliminary data suggest that 177 Lu-PSMA-radioligand therapy (RLT) also has high potential in additional clinical situations. Hence, the radiopharmaceuticals [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T are currently being evaluated in ongoing phase 3 trials. The purpose of this guideline is to assist nuclear medicine personnel, to select patients with highest potential to benefit from 177 Lu-PSMA-RLT, to perform the procedure in accordance with current best practice, and to prepare for possible side effects and their clinical management. We also provide expert advice, to identify those clinical situations which may justify the off-label use of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or other emerging ligands on an individual patient basis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)