Search

This article can only skim the surface of an extraordinary career of Dr Alper from the early days in South Africa and throughout her life. She overcame many obstacles to become widely acknowledged as having had an immense effect on the study of radiation biology. Her very considerable personal scientific achievements in no way prevented her from taking time to help and inspire others in the field as well as maintaining a long and happy family life. If an example is needed to show what can be achieved with a combination of total intellectual integrity and determined application, then Tikvah Alper certainly provided this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several scientific themes are reviewed in the context of the 75-year period relevant to this special platinum issue of Radiation Research. Two criteria have been considered in selecting the scientific themes. One is the exposure of the associated research activity in the annual meetings of the Radiation Research Society (RRS) and in the publications of the Society's Journal, thus reflecting the interest of members of RRS. The second criteria is a focus on contributions from Australian members of RRS. The first theme is the contribution of radiobiology to radiation oncology, featuring two prominent Australian radiation oncologists, the late Rod Withers and his younger colleague, Lester Peters. Two other themes are also linked to radiation oncology; preclinical research aimed at developing experimental radiotherapy modalities, namely microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) and Auger endoradiotherapy. The latter has a long history, in contrast to MRT, especially in Australia, given that the associated medical beamline at the Australian Synchrotron in Melbourne only opened in 2011. Another theme is DNA repair, which has a trajectory parallel to the 75-year period of interest, given the birth of molecular biology in the 1950s. The low-dose radiobiology theme has a similar timeline, predominantly prompted by the nuclear era, which is also connected to the radioprotector theme, although radioprotectors also have a long-established potential utility in cancer radiotherapy. Finally, two themes are associated with biodosimetry. One is the micronucleus assay, highlighting the pioneering contribution from Michael Fenech in Adelaide, South Australia, and the other is the γ-H2AX assay and its widespread clinical applications., (© 2024 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.)

The concept of radiation-induced clustered damage in DNA has grown over the past several decades to become a topic of considerable interest across the scientific disciplines involved in studies of the biological effects of ionizing radiation. This paper, prepared for the 70th anniversary issue of Radiation Research, traces historical development of the three main threads of physics, chemistry, and biochemical/cellular responses that led to the hypothesis and demonstration that a key component of the biological effectiveness of ionizing radiation is its characteristic of producing clustered DNA damage of varying complexities. The physics thread has roots that started as early as the 1920s, grew to identify critical nanometre-scale clusterings of ionizations relevant to biological effectiveness, and then, by the turn of the century, had produced an extensive array of quantitative predictions on the complexity of clustered DNA damage from different radiations. Monte Carlo track structure simulation techniques played a key role through these developments, and they are now incorporated into many recent and ongoing studies modelling the effects of radiation. The chemistry thread was seeded by water-radiolysis descriptions of events in water as radical-containing "spurs," demonstration of the important role of the hydroxyl radical in radiation-inactivation of cells and the difficulty of protection by radical scavengers. This led to the concept and description of locally multiply damaged sites (LMDS) for DNA double-strand breaks and other combinations of DNA base damage and strand breakage that could arise from a spur overlapping, or created in very close proximity to, the DNA. In these ways, both the physics and the chemistry threads, largely in parallel, put out the challenge to the experimental research community to verify these predictions of clustered DNA damage from ionizing radiations and to investigate their relevance to DNA repair and subsequent cellular effects. The third thread, biochemical and cell-based research, responded strongly to the challenge by demonstrating the existence and biological importance of clustered DNA damage. Investigations have included repair of a wide variety of defined constructs of clustered damage, evaluation of mutagenic consequences, identification of clustered base-damage within irradiated cells, and identification of co-localization of repair complexes indicative of complex clustered damage after high-LET irradiation, as well as extensive studies of the repair pathways involved in repair of simple double-strand breaks. There remains, however, a great deal more to be learned because of the diversity of clustered DNA damage and of the biological responses., (© 2024 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.)

Numerous dose rate effects have been described over the past 6-7 decades in the radiation biology and radiation oncology literature depending on the dose rate range being discussed. This review focuses on the impact and understanding of altering dose rates in the context of radiation therapy, but does not discuss dose rate effects as relevant to radiation protection. The review starts with a short historic review of early studies on dose rate effects, considers mechanisms thought to underlie dose rate dependencies, then discusses some current issues in clinical findings with altered dose rates, the importance of dose rate in brachytherapy, and the current timely topic of the use of very high dose rates, so-called FLASH radiotherapy. The discussion includes dose rate effects in vitro in cultured cells, in in vivo experimental systems and in the clinic, including both tumors and normal tissues. Gaps in understanding dose rate effects are identified, as are opportunities for improving clinical use of dose rate modulation., (© 2024 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.)

At the dawn of the 20th Century, the underlying chemistry that produced the observed effects of ionizing radiation, e.g., X rays and Radium salts, on aqueous solutions was either unknown or restricted to products found postirradiation. For example, the Curies noted that sealed aqueous solutions of Radium inexplicably decomposed over time, even when kept in the dark. By 1928 there were numerous papers describing the phenomenological effects of ionizing radiation on a wide variety of materials, including the irradiated hands of early radiologists. One scientist who became intensely interested in these radiation effects was Hugo Fricke (Fricke Dosimetry) who established a laboratory in 1928 dedicated to studies on chemical effects of radiation, the results of which he believed were necessary to understand observed radiobiological effects. In this Platinum Issue of Radiation Research (70 years of continuous publication), we present the early history of the development of radiation chemistry and its contributions to all levels of mechanistic radiobiology. We summarize its development as one of the four disciplinary pillars of the Radiation Research Society and its Journal, Radiation Research, founded during the period 1952-1954. In addition, the work of scientists who contributed substantially to the discipline of Radiation Chemistry and to the birth, life and culture of the Society and its journal is presented. In the years following 1954, the increasing knowledge about the underlying temporal and spatial properties of the species produced by various types of radiation is summarized and related to its radiobiology and to modern technologies (e.g., pulsed radiolysis, electron paramagnetic resonance) which became available as the discipline of radiation chemistry developed. A summary of important results from these studies on Radiation Chemistry/Biochemistry in the 20th and 21st Century up to the present time is presented. Finally, we look into the future to see what possible directions radiation chemistry studies might take, based upon promising current research. We find at least two possible directions that will need radiation chemistry expertise to ensure proper experimental design and interpretation of data. These are FLASH radiotherapy, and mechanisms underlying the effects of low doses of radiation delivered at low dose rates. Examples of how radiation chemists could provide beneficial input to these studies are provided., (© 2024 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.)

Radiation research is a multidisciplinary field, and among its many branches, mathematical and computational modelers have played a significant role in advancing boundaries of knowledge. A fundamental contribution is modelling cellular response to ionizing radiation as that is the key to not only understanding how radiation can kill cancer cells, but also cause cancer and other health issues. The invention of microdosimetry in the 1950s by Harold Rossi paved the way for brilliant scientists to study the mechanism of radiation at cellular and sub-cellular scales. This paper reviews some snippets of ingenious mathematical and computational models published in microdosimetry symposium proceedings and publications of the radiation research community. Among these are simulations of radiation tracks at atomic and molecular levels using Monte Carlo methods, models of cell survival, quantification of the amount of energy required to create a single strand break, and models of DNA-damage-repair. These models can broadly be categorized into mechanistic, semi-mechanistic, and phenomenological approaches, and this review seeks to provide historical context of their development. We salute pioneers of the field and great teachers who supported and educated the younger members of the community and showed them how to build upon their work., (© 2024 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to show the outstanding contribution of Elena Alexandrovna Timofeeva-Resovskaya (1898-1973) to the development of radiobiology., Materials and Methods: We reviewed the author's memoirs and materials from the personal archive, as well as literary and electronic sources., Results and Conclusions: For the first time the autobiography of Elena A. Timofeeva-Resovskaya and the periods of her scientific activity were revealed. We demonstrated the primary role of Elena A. Timofeeva-Resovskaya in the research of aquatic ecosystems. The results of her research turned out to be important both for solving the problems of radioactive contamination of territories and for the development of modern radioecology. Throughout her life, she worked with her husband Nikolay V. Timofeev-Resovsky (1900-1981), a great scientist and prominent scientific enlightener. There was no purpose to describe the life of Timofeev-Resovskies family, full of exciting events, but it was not possible to avoid it. For young women in science, Elena A. Timofeeva-Resovskaya can provide an example of a successful scientific career even in turbulent times.

Chartered by the U.S. Congress in 1961, the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI) is a Joint Department of Defense (DoD) entity with the mission of carrying out the Medical Radiological Defense Research Program in support of our military forces around the globe. In the last 60 years, the investigators at AFRRI have conducted exploratory and developmental research with broad application to the field of radiation sciences. As the only DoD facility dedicated to radiation research, AFRRI's Medical Radiobiology Advisory Team provides deployable medical and radiobiological subject matter expertise, advising commanders in the response to a U.S. nuclear weapon incident and other nuclear or radiological material incidents. AFRRI received the DoD Joint Meritorious Unit Award on February 17, 2004, for its exceptionally meritorious achievements from September 11, 2001 to June 20, 2003, in response to acts of terrorism and nuclear/radiological threats at home and abroad. In August 2009, the American Nuclear Society designated the institute a nuclear historic landmark as the U.S.'s primary source of medical nuclear and radiological research, preparedness and training. Since then, research has continued, and core areas of study include prevention, assessment and treatment of radiological injuries that may occur from exposure to a wide range of doses (low to high). AFRRI collaborates with other government entities, academic institutions, civilian laboratories and other countries to research the biological effects of ionizing radiation. Notable early research contributions were the establishment of dose limits for major acute radiation syndromes in primates, applicable to human exposures, followed by the subsequent evolution of radiobiology concepts, particularly the importance of immune collapse and combined injury. In this century, the program has been essential in the development and validation of prophylactic and therapeutic drugs, such as Amifostine, Neupogen®, Neulasta®, Nplate® and Leukine®, all of which are used to prevent and treat radiation injuries. Moreover, AFRRI has helped develop rapid, high-precision, biodosimetry tools ranging from novel assays to software decision support. New drug candidates and biological dose assessment technologies are currently being developed. Such efforts are supported by unique and unmatched radiation sources and generators that allow for comprehensive analyses across the various types and qualities of radiation. These include but are not limited to both 60Co facilities, a TRIGA® reactor providing variable mixed neutron and γ-ray fields, a clinical linear accelerator, and a small animal radiation research platform with low-energy photons. There are five major research areas at AFRRI that encompass the prevention, assessment and treatment of injuries resulting from the effects of ionizing radiation: 1. biodosimetry; 2. low-level and low-dose-rate radiation; 3. internal contamination and metal toxicity; 4. radiation combined injury; and 5. radiation medical countermeasures. These research areas are bolstered by an educational component to broadcast and increase awareness of the medical effects of ionizing radiation, in the mass-casualty scenario after a nuclear detonation or radiological accidents. This work provides a description of the military medical operations as well as the radiation facilities and capabilities present at AFRRI, followed by a review and discussion of each of the research areas., (©2021 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.)

Research activities and scientific advance achieved in 2019 at the State Institution «National Research Center forRadiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine» (NRCRM) concerning medical problemsof the Chornobyl disaster, radiation medicine, radiobiology, radiation hygiene and epidemiology in collaborationwith the WHO network of medical preparedness and assistance in radiation accidents are outlined in the annualreport. The report presents the results of fundamental and applied research works of the study of radiation effectsand health effects of the Chornobyl accident.The report also shows the results of scientific-organizational and health care work, staff training.The Scientific Council meeting of NAMS approved the NRCRM Annual Report., (D. Bazyka, V.Sushko, A. Chumak, P. Fedirko, V. Talko, L. Yanovych.)

The investigation of cell death mechanisms is one of the fastest growing areas of modern biomedicine. A particular interest in this research topic arose in 1972 after publication of an article by Kerr, Wyllie, and Currie, in which apoptosis, one of the types of cell death, was first considered as a basic biological phenomenon regulating tissue homeostasis. Several Russian groups involved in the investigation of the mechanisms of radiation-induced cell death have drawn attention to the similarity between these two mechanisms. Unfortunately, these studies have been for a long time inaccessible to the international scientific community. These introductory remarks attempt to restore the chain of events that have taken place during the past 50 years.

Peggy Olive from the British Columbia Cancer Research Center in Canada is credited with the development of a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells based on the technique of microelectrophoresis that she named the 'comet assay'; a well-accepted method to measure DNA damage, hypoxia and apoptosis. A multifaceted person and an ardent campaigner of environmental issues, Peggy has contributed significantly to several areas of radiobiology related to the treatment of cancer, her expertise being tumor hypoxia and gamma H2AX foci as a biomarker in radiotherapy.

Finland has a long history in monitoring external radiation. Regular monitoring began in the early 1960s when the first networks measuring exposure rates were established. Today the nation-wide network is fully automatic and consists of about 260 stations with Geiger-Műller (GM) tubes. Some 25 stations also have a LaBr3 spectrometer. In this article the authors describe the history, experiences and major development stages of the Finnish dose rate monitoring arrangements and also have a brief look at the possible future., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In the 60 years since the inaugural edition of the International Journal of Radiation Biology , much of our understanding of the biological effects of solar radiation has changed. Earlier in the century, sunlight played a 'hero's' role in reducing disabling rickets, while today debate still continues on the amount of sun required before exposure reveals the 'villainous' side of solar radiation. Although knowledge of the ultra violet (UV) component of sunlight as a carcinogen has become widespread, skin cancer rates are still rising yearly. Twentieth century attitudes have seen an about-face in the field of dermatological sun protection, with sunscreens changing from recipes designed to promote a 'healthy tan' to formulations proven to block both ultraviolet B (UVB) and more recently, ultraviolet A (UVA), to minimize premature sun-aging and skin cancer risk. In the early 1960s, DNA was first found to exist within mitochondria, while recently the connections between mitochondrial changes and UV radiation exposure have been expanded. Sixty years ago, understanding of the endocrine systems of mammals was enjoying its infancy. Early discoveries that light, particularly natural light, could have profound effects on functions such as sleep patterns and hormonal balance were made, while today more advanced knowledge has led to lighting improvements having pronounced effects on human wellbeing. Photosensitization 60 years ago was a health concern for both humans and their domestic animals, while today chemically engineered photosensitizing drugs can be administered along with highly directed light to pinpoint delivery targets for drug action. Life on earth is inextricably bound up with solar radiation. This article attempts to outline many of the ways in which our opinions about solar radiation have changed since the journal's inception.

Purpose: Neutrons were an active field of radiobiology at the time of publication of the first issues of the International Journal of Radiation Biology in 1959. Three back-to-back papers published by Neary and his colleagues contain key elements of interest at the time. The present article aims to put these papers into context with the discovery of the neutron 27 years previously and then give a feel for how the field has progressed to the present day. It does not intend to provide a comprehensive review of this enormous field, but rather to provide selective summaries of main driving forces and developments. Conclusions: Neutron radiobiology has continued as a vigorous field of study throughout the past 84 years. Main driving forces have included concern for protection from the harmful effects of neutrons, exploitation and optimization for cancer therapy (fast beam therapy, brachytherapy and boron capture therapy), and scientific curiosity about the mechanisms of radiation action. Effort has fluctuated as the emphasis has shifted from time to time, but all three areas remain active today. Whatever the future holds for the various types of neutron therapy, the health protection aspects will remain with us permanently because of natural environmental exposure to neutrons as well as increased additional exposures from a variety of human activities.

The International Journal of Radiation Biology (IJRB) celebrates its 60th birthday this year. Ahead of this very special issue, we wanted to produce strong representations of the journal's publication history in order to celebrate the current status of the journal and to look forward to its future. This was accomplished using 'reference maps'. Reference data were used from 1959 onward from the highest-cited paper in IJRB, for each respective year, to create a figure displaying when those articles were cited in IJRB since their publication. This was done to show the relative impact of historical IJRB papers to future research. Common themes of research were also examined by decade. Additionally, to show the historical impact of the journal outside of its immediate area of research and its practical applications, information on IJRB articles cited by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) was collected. It was in 1959 when IJRB published the first issue, and when ICRP also issued Publication 1. Among all Publications (1-139), 43 publications have thus far cited 320 IJRB papers and each of which have been cited 1-7 times. Most notably, Publications 90, 99, 118, and 131 cited more than 40 IJRB papers. Further research was done into references for IJRB's contemporary journal: Radiation Research. The most highly cited IJRB articles for each year together since its inception were cited 16,760 times since they were published and cited 1385 times in Radiation Research. Together, these three datasets and their representations show the diversity of historical IJRB publications, the impact of historical IJRB articles in both future research in the journal and outside of it, and articles which new prospective authors contributing to IJRB might find useful in their own research.

This reflection aims to look at the evolution of thinking about radiation dose response relationships from the early years of the journal when target theory prevailed to the present day when dose response is seen as a more holistic process involving multiple levels of organization and communication. The review is structured to consider how the old ideas evolved leading to apparently abrupt paradigm shifts. The odd data leading to these conceptual shifts are reviewed. Topics, which are currently still not mainstream are considered with a view to how they may change the future of radiobiology. Finally some personal reflections on the insights gained during the writing of the review are presented. The major conclusion from this study is that ideas concerning survival curves and radiation dose responses evolved and (epi)mutated gradually, driven in a large part by the techniques available for studying radiobiological processes. The illusion of abrupt paradigm shifts is not really borne out by the history when primary references are studied rather than textbooks or reviews. The textbooks necessarily simplify and distil complex data to provide a 'take-home message' while reviews are usually very personal collations selected among the vast amount of scientific literature. Primary references reveal the context of the discussion and the caveats and uncertainties of the authors.

Hanns Langendorff (1902-1974) was an eminent radiobiologist and a visionary, who not only helped found the field, but also made significant scientific contributions. He was a member of the first editorial board of IJRB and actually published a paper in its first issue about the radio-protector 5-hydroxytryptamine. Langendorff started working in the field of radiobiology in 1929 and became director of the 'Radiologisches Institut' of Freiburg University in 1936. His studies impressively show the development of radiobiology over decades in areas such as radiation-induced cell death at various stages of development, as well as radiosensitivity of sea urchin, yeast and mammals. Using mice, Langendorff made many early discoveries about spermatogenesis, hematopoiesis, prenatal development, chromosomal damage and metabolic pathways after exposures to X-rays and neutrons. He also investigated aspects of target theory and dosimetry and developed personal dosimeters using films. After the atomic bomb catastrophes in Japan, Langendorff and his collaborators soon began research in mice related to acute radiation sickness and stimulated the development of radioprotectors by studying their mechanisms of action associated with cell death, as well as cellular and metabolic changes involved. Langendorff also trained a cadre of young scientists who advanced the field and brought it to its golden age in the seventies and the eighties. Research activities of two of his disciples are reviewed: Ulrich Hagen and the author. Both made significant contributions: Hagen mainly studying DNA-damage and repair in vitro as well in cells and the author investigating metabolic processes, cellular and chromosomal damage, prenatal effects, genomic instability, individual radio-sensitivity and their connections to cancer therapy.

Over the past 60 years a great number of very large datasets have been generated from the experimental exposure of animals to external radiation and internal contamination. This accumulation of 'big data' has been matched by increasingly large epidemiological studies from accidental and occupational radiation exposure, and from plants, humans and other animals affected by environmental contamination. We review the creation, sustainability and reuse of this legacy data, and discuss the importance of Open data and biomaterial archives for contemporary radiobiological sciences, radioecology and epidemiology. We find evidence for the ongoing utility of legacy datasets and biological materials, but that the availability of these resources depends on uncoordinated, often institutional, initiatives to curate and archive them. The importance of open data from contemporary experiments and studies is also very clear, and yet there are few stable platforms for their preservation, sharing, and reuse. We discuss the development of the ERA and STORE data sharing platforms for the scientific community, and their contribution to FAIR sharing of data. The contribution of funding agency and journal policies to the support of data sharing is critical for the maximum utilisation and reproducibility of publicly funded research, but this needs to be matched by training in data management and cultural changes in the attitudes of investigators to ensure the sustainability of the data and biomaterial commons.

Purpose: To reflect on the contributions of R. H. Mole to radiobiology. Robin Mole was a very active radiobiologist when the IJRB was first established and had two papers in the first few issues of the journal in 1959. Conclusions: R. H. Mole made significant contributions to radiobiology and is particularly associated with studies of the effects of low dose exposures on the reproductive health of mammals. Many of his ideas are still debated and remain controversial.

Purpose: Radiation biology is a branch of the radiation research field which focuses on studying radiation effects in cells and organisms. Radiation can be used in biological investigations for two, mutually non-exclusive reasons: (1) to study biological processes by perturbing their functioning (qualitative approach) and (2) to assess consequences of radiation-induced damage (quantitative approach). While the former approach has a basic research character, the latter has an applied character that is driven by needs of medical applications and radiological protection. Radiation protection biology is defined in the sense of the second approach. The aim of the article is to provide a historical review of how radiation protection biology developed and how it influences radiological protection. Conclusions: While radiobiological investigations started immediately after the discovery of X-rays, the qualitative approach dominated until the end of World War II. After 1945, the nuclear weapons race and nuclear energy programs initiated quantitative radiobiological research. Radiation protection biology does not provide results from which radiation risks can be directly derived. Rather, it provides data that is necessary for understanding the nature of risks. Most recent years have seen, especially in Europe, a growing interest in coordinated studies on the effects of low radiation doses.

Purpose: The International Journal of Radiation Biology (IJRB) is celebrating 60 years of publishing in 2019. IJRB has made an enormous contribution to publishing papers that have enhanced our understanding of the DNA damage response (DDR) activated following exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). The IR-induced DDR field has a rich history but many outstanding papers pass unread by young scientists overwhelmed by the current literature. We provide a historical reflection on key advances in the DDR field and interface them with current knowledge. Conclusions: DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) were identified as the major biological lesion induced by IR. But early studies on cells from IR-sensitive ataxia telangiectasia patients showed that DSB repair was not sufficient to prevent IR hypersensitivity. Subsequently, the ATM-dependent signal transduction process was revealed, with the breadth of the response being slowly unearthed. Early studies demonstrated at least two processes of DSB repair and revealed that mis-repair causes translocation formation. Recent studies, however, are unraveling more complexity in the repair process, including the specific processing of DSBs within transcriptionally active regions, and the significance of the chromatin environment. Despite the quality of these early and current studies, many questions remain to be addressed.

Oliver Scott is best known for his research into the role of tumour hypoxia in radiation oncology. Yet no less important were Oliver's activities in the development of concepts and methods for performing translational research on the effect of ionising radiation on tumour in experimental animals, stressing the importance of using strictly inbred animals for transplantation of tumours which had arisen in exactly the identical mouse strain. Otherwise residual immunity would lead to uncontrollable bias in the results of cure experiments, invalidating conclusions. These pioneering views are no less valid in today's cancer research.

Jack Fowler [formally Professor John Francis Fowler PhD, DSc, MD (Hon), FInstP, FRCR, FBIR, FAAPM, FASTRO, FACRO] was a remarkable scientist, known to many in the field of clinical radiation biology as at the forefront of applying linear-quadratic dose-fractionation-time modelling to help improve a wide range of cancer treatments using radiotherapy. His death on 1st December 2016 after a long career of 60 years was marked by Obituaries in six scientific journals in his field e.g. 1-4 Jack is remembered for his quantification of biologically effective dose in a wide variety of radiotherapy practices and modified protocols (supported by experimental-system studies), his extensive publications, his didactic lecturing and teaching abilities, and his warm personality.

Research activities and scientific advance achieved in 2017 at the State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine» (NRCRM) concerning medical problems of the Chornobyl disaster, radiation medicine, radiobiology, radiation hygiene and epidemiology in collaboration with the WHO network of medical preparedness and assistance in radiation accidents are outlined in the annual report. The report presents the results of fundamental and applied research works of the study of radiation effects and health effects of the Chornobyl accident; fulfillment of tasks of «State social program for improving safety, occupational health and working environment in 2014-2018 years».The report also shows the results of scientific-organizational and health care work, staff training.The NRCRM Annual Report was approved at the Scientific Council meeting of NAMS on March 23, 2018., (D. Bazyka, V. Sushko, A. Chumak, P. Fedirko, V. Talko, L. Yanovych.)

Purpose: This review, which arose from a Radiation Research Society History symposium, traces the history of 'bystander effects' or 'indirect effects'(also known as 'abscopal effects', 'clastogenic effects' and more recently 'the secretosome'). In 1905, Murphy first drew attention to effects caused by the injection of irradiated cells into animals. In the present day, bystander effects are seen as part of the secretosome, where they coordinate responses to stressors at the tissue, organism, and population level. The review considers the history and also the reasons why this process of information exchange/communication appears to have been discovered and forgotten several times. The review then considers the evolution of our understanding of the mechanisms and what relevance these effects may have in radiation protection and radiotherapy., Conclusions: The authors conclude that the phenomenon currently described as a 'bystander effect' has been described under a variety of different names since 1905. However recent advances in biology have made it possible to investigate mechanisms and potential impacts more fully. This has led to the current upsurge in research into this effect of radiation.

Purpose: Understanding the mechanisms behind induced biological response following exposure to ionizing radiation is not only important in assessing the risk associated with human exposure, but potentially can help identify ways of improving the efficacy of radiotherapy. Over the decades, there has been much discussion on what is the key biological target for radiation action and its associated size. It was already known in the 1930s that microscopic features of radiation significantly influenced biological outcomes. This resulted in the development of classic target theory, leading to field of microdosimetry and subsequently nanodosimetry, studying the inhomogeneity and stochastics of interactions, along with the identification of DNA as a key target., Conclusions: Ultimately, the biological response has been found to be dependent on the radiation track structure (spatial and temporal distribution of ionization and excitation events). Clustering of energy deposition on the nanometer scale has been shown to play a critical role in determining biological response, producing not just simple isolated DNA lesions but also complex clustered lesions that are more difficult to repair. The frequency and complexity of these clustered damage sites are typically found to increase with increasing LET. However in order to fully understand the consequences, it is important to look at the relative distribution of these lesions over larger dimensions along the radiation track, up to the micrometer scale. Correlation of energy deposition events and resulting sites of DNA damage can ultimately result in complex gene mutations and complex chromosome rearrangements following repair, with the frequency and spectrum of the resulting rearrangements critically dependent on the spatial and temporal distribution of these sites and therefore the radiation track. Due to limitations in the techniques used to identify these rearrangements it is likely that the full complexity of the genetic rearrangements that occur has yet to be revealed. This paper discusses these issues from a historical perspective, with many of these historical studies still having relevance today. These can not only cast light on current studies but guide future studies, especially with the increasing range of biological techniques available. So, let us build on past knowledge to effectively explore the future.

This paper provides a historical perspective on the origin and development of Target Theory and how its central concepts have influenced the thought processes of radiation biologists for almost a century.

Purpose: Even though the first ultraviolet microbeam was described by S. Tschachotin back in 1912, the development of sophisticated micro-irradiation facilities only began to flourish in the late 1980s. In this article, we highlight significant microbeam experiments, describe the latest microbeam irradiator configurations and critical discoveries made by using the microbeam apparatus., Materials and Methods: Modern radiological microbeams facilities are capable of producing a beam size of a few micrometers, or even tens of nanometers in size, and can deposit radiation with high precision within a cellular target. In the past three decades, a variety of microbeams has been developed to deliver a range of radiations including charged particles, X-rays, and electrons. Despite the original intention for their development to measure the effects of a single radiation track, the ability to target radiation with microbeams at sub-cellular targets has been extensively used to investigate radiation-induced biological responses within cells., Results: Studies conducted using microbeams to target specific cells in a tissue have elucidated bystander responses, and further studies have shown reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) play critical roles in the process. The radiation-induced abscopal effect, which has a profound impact on cancer radiotherapy, further reaffirmed the importance of bystander effects. Finally, by targeting sub-cellular compartments with a microbeam, we have reported cytoplasmic-specific biological responses. Despite the common dogma that nuclear DNA is the primary target for radiation-induced cell death and carcinogenesis, studies conducted using microbeam suggested that targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular stress, and genomic instability. A more recent development in microbeam technology includes application of mouse models to visualize in vivo DNA double-strand breaks., Conclusions: Microbeams are making important contributions towards our understanding of radiation responses in cells and tissue models.

Purpose: Review the historical basis for the use of fractionated radiation in radiation oncology., Conclusion: The history of dose fractionation in radiation oncology is long and tortuous, and the radiobiologist's understanding of why fractionation worked came decades after radiation oncologists had adopted multi-week daily-dose fractionation as 'standard'. Central to the history is the search for 'isoeffective' formulas that would allow different radiation schedules to be compared. Initially, this meant dealing with different lengths of treatment, leading to the 1944 Strandqvist formulation that dominated thinking for decades. Concerns about the number of fractions, not just the total time, led to the 1967 Ellis NSD formulation that held sway through the 1980s. The development of experimental radiotherapy in 1970s (e.g. Fowler's work at the Gray Laboratory, and Fischer's work at Yale) led to biologically-based approaches that culminated with the Biologically Effective Dose (BED) concept. BED is the current dogma for treatment optimization, but it must be used with caution, as there are multiple formulations, and some parameters have debatable values. There is also a controversy about whether BED is biologically-based or a 'curve-fitting' exercise. These latter issues are beyond the scope of this article, but the history of fractionation models suggests that our current concepts are probably wrong, although when used with caution they are clearly useful.

A symposium entitled Environmental Mutagenesis and Radiation Biology was held on September 27, 2016 to honor the memory of Dr. William F. Morgan who passed away unexpectedly on November 13, 2015. The speakers presented the latest reviews on homologous recombination repair, induced genetic instability, bystander effects, and risk estimate development. Their presentations are presented following the introduction., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Research activities and scientific advance achieved in 2016 at the State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine» (NRCRM) concerning medical problems of the Chornobyl disaster, radiation medicine, radiobiology, radiation hygiene and epidemiology in collaboration with the WHO network of medical preparedness and assistance in radiation accidents are outlined in the annual report. The report presents the results of fundamental and applied research works of the study of radiation effects and health effects of the Chornobyl accident; fulfillment of tasks of «State social program for improving safety, occupational health and working environment in 2014-2018 years».The report also shows the results of scientific organizational and health care work, staff training. The NRCRM Annual Report was approved at the Scientific Council meeting of NAMS on March 17, 2016., (D. Bazyka, V. Sushko, A. Chumak, V. Buzunov, V. Talko, L. Yanovych.)

Radiobiology assesses the biological hazards of exposure to radioactive substances and nuclear radiation. This article explores the history of radiobiology in twentieth-century China by examining the overlapping of radium research and biophysics, from roughly the 1920s Nationalist period to the 1960s Communist period; from the foreign purchase of radium by the Rockefeller Foundation's China Medical Board during the Republican era, to the institutional establishment of radiobiology as a subset of biophysics in the People's Republic. Western historiography of radiobiology highlights the connection between the military development of nuclear weapons and the civilian use of radiation in biology, as well as the international export of radioisotopes and nuclear reactors. Considering the exclusion of China from Western atomic diplomacy, I argue that the study of the Chinese history of bomb-making and radiobiology is necessary not just to fill an existing knowledge gap, but more importantly to elucidate the influence of the Chinese nuclear weapons program and Cold War atomic politics on Chinese life-science enterprises. Through examining the formational history of the radiobiology program in China, I hope to shed light on the implications of the atomic age for Chinese biology in the twentieth century.