Search

Objectives: To quantify the occupational radiation exposure with a 3-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopic machine during routine use in pelvic and acetabular surgery and to determine whether the additional radiation exposure encountered with the 3D fluoroscopic spin is within previously accepted limits., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Level I trauma center., Patient Selection Criteria: All patients undergoing 3D fluoroscopy intraoperatively during pelvis (OTA/AO 61B,C) or acetabular (OTA/AO 62A-C) surgery between April 2021 and July 2021., Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Radiation dose at standardized locations around the operating room during the spin portion of the 3D fluoroscopy., Results: Seventy-six 3D spins were performed on 69 patients during the study period. The average emitted radiation dose from the machine for the routine fluoroscopy portion of the case was 74.5 mGy. The average displayed radiation dose in the air for the spin portion of the case was 39.9 mGy, an average of 53.6% less radiation than the routine fluoroscopy portion. For the spin portion, the average radiation exposure seen by the patient was 3.42 mGy (centered on the patient) and the average maximal exposure in the room was 0.062 mGy. Minimal radiation was detected outside the operating room doors., Conclusions: The radiation exposure encountered by operating room personnel with 3D fluoroscopy appears to be within safe occupational limits. The marginal increase in radiation exposure during pelvic and acetabular surgery should not discourage the use of 3D imaging intraoperatively., Level of Evidence: Level IV, Case Series., Competing Interests: M. M. Gosselin: Board member for AAOS, Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons; A. E. Levack: Board member for Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Grant funding from NIH and DePuy Synthes, all unrelated this work; J. L. Gary: Stryker—consulting and royalties, Smith and Nephew—consulting, SMV Scientific—stockholder, Curvafix—consulting and stock options, AONA—Board Member, JOT and JBJS—Editorial Board Member, all unrelated to this work; S. J. Warner: AAOS, AONA, OTA Committee member, Globus, Smith and Nephew, Stryker: paid presenter/speaker; M. L. C. Routt: AONA Board member, Johnson and Johnson, Stryker and Zimmer: paid presenter/speaker. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Realistic simulation models for interventional radiology procedures are limited, including for placement of double-J ureteral stents (DJSs). Using a porcine kidney and empty saline bag (bladder), an ex vivo model aiming to improve operators' knowledge and confidence in performing a DJS procedure was developed. Six faculty (J.W., J.L.) and 14 trainees (C.B.O.) successfully operated on the model. Mean results for faculty versus trainees were as follows: 2.2 (SD ± 1.5) versus 2.4 (SD ± 1.5) puncture attempts to access the collecting system (P = .78), 14.5 minutes (SD ± 4.8) versus 15.1 minutes (SD ± 6.0) for insertion time (P = .84), 7.3 minutes (SD ± 2.8) versus 10.3 minutes (SD ± 2.6) for exchange time (P = .04), 8.48 minutes (SD ± 2.0) versus 8.01 minutes (SD ± 2.6) for fluoroscopy time (P = .70), and 5.7 mGy (SD ± 1.6) versus 5.4 mGy (SD ± 2.0) for absorbed air kerma (P = .77). Self-assessed knowledge and confidence with DJS placement increased for all participants following model use., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: To investigate the impact of radiation exposure from a computed tomography (CT) scanner on the functional integrity of a wearable insulin delivery system., Methods: A total of 160 Omnipods and four personal diabetes managers (PDMs) were evenly divided into four groups: (1) control group (no radiation exposure), (2) typical radiation exposure group, (3) 4× typical radiation exposure group, and (4) scatter radiation group. Pods were attached to an anthropomorphic torso phantom on the abdomen (direct irradiation) or shoulder (scatter radiation) region. A third-generation dual-source CT scanner was used to scan the pods using either a typical exposure (used for routine CT abdominal study of a median size patient) or 4× typical exposure. A manufacturer-recommended 20-step functionality test was performed for all 160 Omnipods., Results: The radiation dose (measured in volume CT Dose index) was 16 mGy for a typical exposure, and 64 mGy for 4× typical exposure. The scatter radiation is less than 0.1 mGy. All Pods passed the functionality test except one pod in the scatter radiation group, which sounded an alarm due to occlusion. The blockage to the fluid was due to a kink in the soft cannula, a mechanical issue not caused by the radiation exposure., Conclusions: This study suggests X-ray exposure levels used in radiological imaging procedures do not negatively impact the functional integrity of Omnipods. This finding may support the potential for the manufacturer to remove the warning that patients should remove the Pod for X-ray imaging procedures, which will have a huge impact on patient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Alex Nguyen, Felipe Lauand, and Todd Vienneau are employees of Insulet, Inc.

Background: Intraoperative fluoroscopy is increasingly common in orthopaedics, although recent guidelines have reduced the maximum recommended exposure to 20 mSv annually. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to comprehensively assess current adherence to exposure guidelines, identify practice settings at increased risk for exposure, and determine the best practices and personal protective equipment for ocular radiation risk mitigation., Questions/purposes: In this systematic review we asked: (1) Is the annual amount of eye irradiation received by orthopaedic surgeons below the recommended limit of 20 mSv? (2) What is the effectiveness of leaded glasses in reducing the eye's exposure to radiation? (3) Which imaging setups and operative techniques reduce ocular irradiation?, Methods: PubMed, Medline, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar were queried on September 28, 2023, to identify studies assessing intraoperative ocular radiation exposure among orthopaedic surgeons. Studies that measured radiation in or around the eye (such as the bridge of the nose or eyebrows) during orthopaedic procedures were included. Exclusion criteria were duplicate studies, studies that only estimated eye radiation based on the radiation dose recorded at parts of the body distant from the eyes, nonoriginal research, case reports, and articles without full-text English versions available. A total of 393 unique articles were retrieved, and after title, abstract, and full-text screening, 23 dosimetry studies were included, comprising 12 prospective observational studies, 7 phantom models, 1 cadaver model, 2 observational studies, and 1 randomized control trial. Risk of bias was determined via the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Study quality was generally good to excellent, with noncomparative studies having a mean MINORS score of 14 ± 0 of 16 and comparative studies achieving a mean score of 19 ± 1 of 24, with higher scores representing better study quality. Due to extensive heterogeneity in study design, a meta-analysis was not conducted, with the results rather presented as a narrative summary of key findings., Results: The vast majority of surgeons conducting a variety of orthopaedic and traumatologic procedures were not exposed to a hazardous level of eye irradiation annually, but surgeons who perform a high volume of fluoroscopy-intensive procedures may exceed guidelines. Leaded eyeglasses reduced eye radiation by about 90%, with sport wrap-around glasses offering better shielding than alternatives, although leaded glasses overall were largely underutilized. Positioning mini C-arms in the standard vertical configuration was shown to provide up to a 13-fold decrease in radiation exposure compared with inverted configuration, while standing perpendicular to the fluoroscope further reduced eye irradiation., Conclusion: We found that orthopaedic surgeons who perform a high volume of fluoroscopy-intensive procedures may be at risk of exceeding recommendations on annual radiation exposure, although exposure can be mitigated through various simple strategies. In particular, this analysis found that the use of sport wrap-around leaded glasses, positioning of mini-C arms in the standard vertical configuration, and standing perpendicular to the fluoroscope provide the most effective means of limiting ocular radiation exposure. As ophthalmic radiation exposure presents a potentially important occupational health hazard to orthopaedic surgeons, further investigations of radiation exposure specific to high-volume, fluoroscopy-intensive orthopaedic practices and long-term ophthalmic outcomes will help determine the extent of the potential harm posed by frequent exposure to intraoperative radiation over the span of a career., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Although coil embolization is commonly perceived as a minimally invasive procedure, the associated radiation exposure cannot be disregarded. To date, no specific study has investigated radiation exposure during coil embolization. This study aimed to investigate the potential of lowering the pulse rate to decrease radiation exposure during coil embolization while maintaining patient safety. Radiation data and clinical features of 70 patients who underwent coil embolization between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Since July 2017, the pulse rate was regulated from 7.5 to 4 frames per second (f/s). Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between pulse rate and radiation exposure. Out of the 70 procedures, 30 were performed at the standard pulse rate (7.5 f/s), and 40 were performed at the lower pulse rate (4 f/s). In the lower-pulse-rate group, the absorbed dose to the patient (AK) was 2580.7 (±217) mGy, whereas in the standard-pulse-rate group, it was 4760 (±411.1). Both the dose-area product (DAP) and AK were substantially reduced in the low pulse rate group (p = 0.000002). There was a significant correlation between DAP and AK and pulse rate (p = 0.004, p = 0.0017, respectively). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between pulse rate and perioperative complications. Our findings suggest that using a lower pulse rate (4 f/s) can effectively reduce radiation exposure during coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms while ensuring patient safety.

Medical imaging is both valuable and essential in the care of patients. Much of this imaging depends on ionizing radiation with attendant responsibilities for judicious use when performing an examination. This responsibility applies in settings of both individual as well as multiple (recurrent) imaging with associated repeated radiation exposures. In addressing the roles and responsibilities of the medical communities in the paradigm of recurrent imaging, both the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) have issued position statements, each affirmed by other organizations. The apparent difference in focus and approach has resulted in a lack of clarity and continued debate. Aiming towards a coherent approach in dealing with radiation exposure in recurrent imaging, the IAEA convened a panel of experts, the purpose of which was to identify common ground and reconcile divergent perspectives. The effort has led to clarifying recommendations for radiation exposure aspects of recurrent imaging, including the relevance of patient agency and the provider-patient covenant in clinical decision-making. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: An increasing awareness, generating some lack of clarity and divergence in perspectives, with patients receiving relatively high radiation doses (e.g., ≥ 100 mSv) from recurrent imaging warrants a multi-stakeholder accord for the benefit of patients, providers, and the imaging community. KEY POINTS: • Recurrent medical imaging can result in an accumulation of exposures which exceeds 100 milli Sieverts. • Professional organizations have different perspectives on roles and responsibilities for recurrent imaging. • An expert panel reconciles differing perspectives for addressing radiation exposure from recurrent medical imaging., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is performed in children with significant aortic stenosis (AS). Traditionally, contrast angiography measures the annulus and assesses aortic regurgitation (AR) after each dilation. Echocardiographic guidance is hypothesized to reduce contrast and radiation exposure, without compromising efficacy or safety. Patients < 10 kg undergoing BAV from 2013 to 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Agreement between echocardiographic and angiographic annulus measurements was assessed. Echocardiogram-guided (eBAV) and traditional angiogram-guided (tBAV) outcomes were compared controlling for weight, critical AS, and other congenital heart disease (CHD). Twelve eBAV and 19 tBAV procedures were performed. The median age was 33 days, median weight was 4.3 kg, 7 patients (23%) had critical AS, and 9 patients (29%) had other CHD. Annulus measurements by intraprocedural echocardiography and angiography displayed excellent correlation (ICC 0.95, p < 0.001). eBAV patients received less contrast (0.5 vs 3.5 ml/kg, p < 0.01). Five recent eBAV procedures were performed contrast free. Radiation exposure was not statistically different between the eBAV and tBAV groups (155 vs 313 µGy·M 2 , p = 0.12). One eBAV patient (8%) and 3 tBAV patients (16%, p = 0.62) experienced serious adverse events. Technical success (gradient < 35 mmHg and increase in AR by ≤ 1 grade) occurred in 11 eBAV patients (92%) and 16 tBAV patients (84%, p = 0.22). AR increased in 2 eBAV patients (17%) and 8 tBAV patients (44%, p = 0.02). eBAV was associated with similar efficacy and significantly lower contrast exposure and risk of aortic regurgitation. There was strong agreement between aortic valve annulus measurements by intraprocedural echocardiography and angiography, ultimately permitting contrast free BAV., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Saguner received educational grants through his institution from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Medtronic and speaker/advisory board/consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare, Biotronik, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, StrideBio, and Zoll. The rest of the authors report no conflicts of interest.

The advent of fluoroscopically guided cardiology procedures has greatly improved patient outcomes but has also increased occupational radiation exposure for healthcare professionals, leading to adverse health effects such as radiation-induced cataracts, alopecia, and cancer. This emphasizes the need for effective radiation safety training. Traditional training methods, often based on passive learning, fail to simulate the dynamic catheterization laboratory environment adequately. Virtual Reality (VR) offers a promising alternative by providing immersive, interactive experiences that mimic real-world scenarios without the risks of actual radiation exposure. Our study aims to assess the effectiveness of VR-based radiation safety training compared to traditional methods. We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 48 healthcare professionals in a catheterization lab setting. Participants underwent a 1-hour self-directed VR training session using Virtual Medical Coaching's RadSafe VR software, which simulates real-world clinical scenarios. Pre- and post-intervention radiation dose levels were measured using personal dosimeters at the eye, chest, and pelvis. Knowledge and skills were assessed through tests, and feedback was gathered through surveys and interviews. Statistical analysis revealed significant reductions in radiation exposure across all professional groups after VR training. For cardiologists, the eye dose dropped by 21.88% (from 2.88 mSv to 2.25 mSv), the chest dose decreased by 21.65% (from 4.11 mSv to 3.22 mSv), and the pelvis dose went down by 21.84% (from 2.06 mSv to 1.61 mSv). Perioperative nurses experienced similar reductions, with eye doses decreasing by 14.74% (from 1.56 mSv to 1.33 mSv), chest doses by 26.92% (from 2.6 mSv to 1.9 mSv), and pelvis doses by 26.92% (from 1.3 mSv to 0.95 mSv). Radiographers saw their eye doses reduced by 18.95% (from 0.95 mSv to 0.77 mSv), chest doses by 42.11% (from 1.9 mSv to 1.1 mSv), and pelvis doses by 27.63% (from 0.76 mSv to 0.55 mSv).Participants reported enhanced engagement, improved understanding of radiation safety, and a preference for VR over traditional methods. A cost analysis also demonstrated the economic advantages of VR training, with significant savings in staff time and rental costs compared to traditional methods. Our findings suggest that VR is a highly effective and cost-efficient training tool for radiation safety in healthcare, offering significant benefits over traditional training approaches., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: We aimed to investigate the radiation dose to the eye lens (lens dose) during cerebral angiography and to evaluate the effectiveness of the lens dose reduction protocol for 3-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) in reducing overall lens dose exposure., Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial at a tertiary hospital with patients undergoing cerebral angiography. The lens dose reduction protocol in 3D-RA involved raising the table to position the patient's eye lens away from the rotation axis. The lens dose was estimated by measuring the entrance surface air kerma using a photoluminescent glass dosimeter. The lens doses of 3D-RA, overall examination, and image quality were analyzed and compared between the two groups., Results: A total of 20 participants (mean age, 58±9.4 years; including 12 men [60%]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional group or the dose reduction group. The median lens dose in 3D-RA was significantly lower in the dose reduction group compared with the conventional group (1.1 mGy vs 4.5 mGy, p<0.001). The total dose was significantly lower in the dose reduction group (median of 7.5 mGy vs 10.2 mGy, p=0.003). In the conventional group, 3D-RA accounted for 46% of the total lens dose, while in the dose reduction group, its proportion decreased to 16%. No significant differences were observed in the image quality between the groups., Conclusion: The lens dose reduction protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the lens dose of the 3D-RA as well as entire cerebral angiography, while maintaining the image quality., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has a high diagnostic accuracy for visualization of grafts. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in patients with CABG is associated with increased procedural time, contrast agent administration, radiation exposure, and complications, compared with non-CABG patients. The aim of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial was to compare the strategy of CCTA-guided ICA versus classic ICA in patients with prior CABG., Methods: Patients with prior CABG were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to have a CCTA before ICA (CCTA-ICA, group A) or not (ICA-only, group B). The primary end point of the study was the total volume (milliliters) of the contrast agent administered., Results: A total of 251 patients were randomized, and 225 were included in analysis; 110 in group A and 115 in group B. The total contrast volume was higher in group A (184.5 [143-255] versus 154 [102-240] mL; P =0.001). The contrast volume administered during the invasive procedure was lower in group A (101.5 [60-151] versus 154 [102-240]; P <0.001). Total fluoroscopy time was decreased in group A (480 [259-873] versus 594 [360-1080] seconds; P =0.027), but total effective dose was increased (24.1 [17.7-32] versus 10.8 [5.6-18] mSv; P <0.001). The rate of contrast-induced nephropathy, periprocedural complications, and major adverse cardiac events during 3 to 5 and 30 days did not differ significantly between the 2 groups., Conclusions: A CCTA-directed ICA strategy for patients with CABG is associated with expedition of the invasive procedure, and less fluoroscopy time, at the cost of higher total contrast volume and effective radiation dose, compared with the classic ICA approach., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04631809., Competing Interests: None.

During the radiographic examination of the chest and bones in hospitals, communicating and maintaining posture is difficult for some patients, and movement before or during X-ray irradiation may necessitate re-exposure owing to body wobbling movements or breathing movements. To prevent the need for re-exposure during radiography and to determine the exposure timing, a body movement detection system that considers breathing movements was developed in this study. The posture of a patient was monitored using an RGB camera. The acquired video data was analyzed to detect body movement using either an inter-frame difference method or an optical flow estimation method. The performance of the system was evaluated by detecting the body and breathing movements during positioning. Consequently, the inter-frame difference method detected 179.8-1222.2 pixels during body movements, and the optical flow estimation method confirmed that the feature points moved by 5.5-26.6 mm (4.2-20.3 pixels). When detecting breathing movements, 82-585 pixels were detected by the inter-frame difference method, and the optical flow estimation method showed that the feature points moved by 5.2 mm (2-4 pixels). Therefore, the proposed method can detect body movements during radiography to prevent re-exposure due to body wobble and breathing movements. For healthcare providers, it will lead to reduce not only concerns about patient exposure but also unnecessary radiographic workload., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Purpose of Review: In this review, we discuss the status of novel radiation shielding and other methods to reduce radiation exposure and its associated health risks within the CCL., Recent Findings: There are many devices on the market each with its unique advantages and inherent flaws. Several are available for widespread use with promising data, while others still in development. The field of percutaneous transcatheter interventions includes complex procedures often involving significant radiation exposure. Increased radiation exposes the proceduralist and CCL staff to potential harm from both direct effects of radiation but also from the ergonomic consequences of daily use of heavy personal protective equipment. Here we discuss several innovative efforts to reduce both radiation exposure and orthopedic injury within the CCL that are available, leading to a safer daily routine in a "lead [apron]-free" environment., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Neck computed tomography (NCT) is essential for diagnosing suspected neck tumors and abscesses, but radiation exposure can be an issue. In conventional reconstruction techniques, limiting radiation dose comes at the cost of diminished diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of an AI-based denoising post-processing software solution in low-dose neck computer tomography., Materials and Methods: From 01 September 2023 to 01 December 2023, we retrospectively included patients with clinically suspected neck tumors from the same single-source scanner. The scans were reconstructed using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (Original) at 100% and simulated 50% and 25% radiation doses. Each dataset was post-processed using a novel denoising software solution (Denoising). Three radiologists with varying experience levels subjectively rated image quality, diagnostic confidence, sharpness, and contrast for all pairwise combinations of radiation dose and reconstruction mode in a randomized, blinded forced-choice setup. Objective image quality was assessed using ROI measurements of mean CT numbers, noise, and a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). An adequately corrected mixed-effects analysis was used to compare objective and subjective image quality., Results: At each radiation dose level, pairwise comparisons showed significantly lower image noise and higher CNR for Denoising than for Original (p < 0.001). In subjective analysis, image quality, diagnostic confidence, sharpness, and contrast were significantly higher for Denoising than for Original at 100 and 50 % (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the subjective ratings between Original 100 % and Denoising 25 % (p = 0.906)., Conclusions: The investigated denoising algorithm enables diagnostic-quality neck CT images with radiation doses reduced to 25% of conventional levels, significantly minimizing patient exposure., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The risk of radiation exposure in the surgical operating room (OR) and/or catheterization laboratory is now well established. Complex endovascular procedures often require multiple approaches and different positioning of the staff members around the patient, potentially increasing the levels of radiations exposure. Our goal was to evaluate the levels of radiation exposure of the members of the staff during endovascular aortic procedures in order to propose radioprotection optimization., Methods: We included 41 aortic endovascular procedures out of 114 procedures performed between January 12, 2014, and August 31, 2015, including 24 standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), 7 EVAR with iliac branch (EVARib), 8 complex fenestrated/branched EVAR (F/B EVAR), and 2 thoracic EVAR (TEVAR). Procedures were performed in an OR equipped with a carbon fiber table and a mobile fluoroscopy C-arm. We collected the usual dosimetry data given by the C-arm as well as the patient's peak skin dose (PSD). In all staff members, radiation exposure was measured with thermoluminescent chip dosimeters placed on both temples, on posterior sides of both hands, and on both lower legs., Results: PSD levels were low for EVAR because 24 patients had values below the reading threshold. PSD significantly increased with more complex procedures. Main operator (MO) received the higher level of irradiation on whole body, hands, and ankles. Eye lenses irradiation was higher on both assistant operators (AOs). Other members received low levels of irradiation. We found a high ranges of radiation exposure with a high risk of exposure for the AO, mainly for F/B EVAR and EVARib., Conclusions: Even if all personal protections are used, staff positioning is a major point that must be considered. If MO is supposed to be the most exposed to X-rays, specific conditions of positioning of the AO may be at risk of exposure., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Rationale and Objectives: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has recently been established as a first-line test in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to the increased use of CCTA, strategies to reduce radiation and contrast medium (CM) exposure are of high importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-adapted CM injection protocol for CCTA compared to a clinically established triphasic injection protocol in terms of image quality, radiation exposure, and CM administration MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled from July 2021 to July 2023. Patients underwent CCTA using a modified triphasic CM injection protocol tailored to the tube voltage by the ATVS algorithm, in a range of 70 to 130 kV with a 10 kV interval. The injection protocol consisted of two phases of mixed CM and saline boluses with different proportions to assure a voltage-specific iodine delivery rate, followed by a third phase of saline flush. This cohort was compared to a control group identified retrospectively and scanned on the same CT system but with a standard triphasic CM protocol. Radiation and contrast dose, subjective and objective image quality (contrast-to-noise-ratio [CNR] and signal-to-noise-ratio [SNR]) were compared between the two groups., Results: The final population consisted of 120 prospective patients matched with 120 retrospective controls, with 20 patients in each kV group. The 120 kV group was excluded from the statistical analysis due to insufficient sample size. A significant CM reduction was achieved in the prospective group overall (46.0 [IQR 37.0-52.0] vs. 51.3 [IQR 40.1-73.0] mL, p < 0.001) and at all kV levels too (all pairwise p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in radiation dose (6.13 ± 4.88 vs. 5.97 ± 5.51 mSv, p = 0.81), subjective image quality (median score of 4 [3-5] vs. 4 [3-5], p = 0.40), CNR, and SNR in the aorta and the left anterior descending coronary artery (all p > 0.05)., Conclusion: ATVS-adapted CM injection protocol allows for diagnostic quality CCTA with reduced CM volume while maintaining similar radiation exposure, subjective and objective image quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest C.G.: None; M.V-N.: None; U.J.S.: receives institutional research support and/or personal fees by Bayer, Bracco, Elucid BioImaging, Guerbet, HeartFlow, Inc., Keya Medical, and Siemens; J.S.: None; E.Z.: None; D.P.: None; G.T.: None; V.G.: None; P.S.: is an employee of Bayer LLC; T.E.: receives travel support and speaker fee from Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, and institutional research support by Siemens Healthineers; A.V-S.: receives institutional research support and/or personal subscriptions from Siemens and Elucid Bioimaging., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the occupational radiation exposure faced by healthcare professionals during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Utilizing an anthropomorphic RANDO phantom equipped with Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs), we replicated ERCP scenarios to measure radiation doses received by medical staff. The study meticulously assessed radiation exposure in various corresponding body regions typically occupied by medical staff during ERCP, with a focus on eyes, thyroid, hands, and reproductive corresponding organ regions. The findings revealed significant variations in radiation doses across different body parts, highlighting areas of higher exposure and underscoring the need for improved protective measures and procedural adjustments. The effective radiation doses were calculated using standard protocols, considering the varying levels of protection offered by lead aprons and thyroid shields. The results demonstrate the substantial radiation exposure experienced by healthcare staff, particularly in regions not adequately shielded. This study emphasizes the necessity for enhanced radiation safety protocols in clinical settings, advocating for advanced protective equipment, training in radiation safety, and the exploration of alternative imaging modalities. The findings have crucial implications for both patient and staff safety, ensuring the continued efficacy and safety of ERCP and similar interventional procedures. This research contributes significantly to the field of occupational health and safety in interventional radiology, providing vital data for the development of safer medical practices., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Radiological Society.)

Abstract: The ICRP 2011 Seoul Statement recommended a reduction in the dose limit for lens exposure to 100 mSv for 5 y and 50 mSv for 1 y. Based on this recommendation, the dose limit for lens exposure was lowered in Japan with the revision of the Ionization Regulations, which took effect in April 2021. In the present study, lens doses were measured during fluoroscopic procedures performed in four departments (Urology, Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, and Orthopedics). Lens doses were measured without protective eyewear for 6 mo (pre-intervention) and then with protective eyewear for the next 6 mo (post-intervention). Monthly doses were collected and lens doses before and after the use of protective eyewear were calculated as the lens dose per unit time. The use of protective eyewear reduced the lens dose per unit time by approximately two thirds. In all departments, the lens dose was slightly lower after than before the intervention. A significant difference was observed in lens doses between the pre- and post-intervention periods in the Urology department. The present results demonstrated the effectiveness of protective eyewear in daily practice. Therefore, the use of protective eyewear is recommended during fluoroscopic procedures., (Copyright © 2024 Health Physics Society.)

Background: Fusion imaging systems have proved to reduce radiation exposure mostly in hybrid rooms but reports with mobile C-arms are few. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the Endonaut navigation system on radiation exposure in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with mobile C-arms., Methods: All patients undergoing EVAR and/or iliac branched devices implantation between January 2016 and August 2022 were included. All procedures were performed with a mobile C-arm (Siemens Avantic or GE Elite until March 2018, Siemens Cios Alpha thereafter). The Endonaut navigation system has been used since January 2021. Two groups were, therefore, compared: before (control group [CGr]) and after the use of Endonaut. Radiation data including Dose Area Product (DAP) values, Air Kerma (AK) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were collected retrospectively., Results: Overall, 153 patients were included: CGr, n = 121; Endonaut group (EnGr), n = 32. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups regarding demographic data. DAP values were significantly lower in the EnGr (38 Gy cm 2  ± 24) vs. the CGr (76 Gy cm 2  ± 51) (P < 0.05) despite a significantly higher number of complex procedures such as iliac branched devices (P < 0.05). AK values were not significantly different between the EnGr and the CGr (196 mGy ±114 vs. 209 mGy ±138) as well as FT (33 minutes ±18 vs. 33 minutes ±16). Technical success was 97% (31/32) in the EnGr vs. 96% (116/121) in the CGr (P = 0.79). The volume of contrast media was significantly lower in the EnGr (94 cc ± 41) vs. the CGr (143 cc ± 66) (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: In this study, the use of the Endonaut angio-navigation system when performing EVAR with mobile C-arms led to a radiation dose reduction without compromising technical success or procedural time., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Radiation exposure in medical settings stands as the primary source of artificial radiation, compounded by the yearly rise in healthcare worker numbers. Ensuring radiation protection is crucial for safeguarding their occupational health. Nevertheless, existing studies on radiation protection behavior exhibit considerable heterogeneity due to various factors., Objective: This scoping review aims to explore the current status of research on radiation protection behavior and identify research gaps, intending to guide future research directions., Methods and Analysis: The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A systematic search will be conducted across English databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline, as well as Chinese databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and China Biomedical Literature Database. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies based on predefined eligibility criteria and extract the data. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion by a third reviewer. The review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews., Strengths and Limitations of This Study: A stakeholder consultation will provide an opportunity to validate the findings and address any potential gaps in the article. In this scoping review, all types of studies will be considered. The effectiveness of the methodological quality of the included studies will not be reported, which may lead to some studies of poor quality being included. Only studies published in English or Chinese after 2010 will be considered in this review, potentially leading to the omission of relevant papers., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Fluoroscopy, a widely used imaging method for RFCA, has significant implications for human health. Although no fluoroscopy or near-zero fluoroscopy strategies have gained popularity, they have limitations, such as long procedure times, additional equipment, and expertise. A simple and cost-effective radiation reduction method is needed for treating AF and is compatible with the daily workflow. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-free and lead apron-free (LAF) after transseptal puncture AF ablation with conventional ablation (CON)., Methods: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent RF catheter AF ablation. The lead apron used for protection was removed immediately before 3D reconstruction of the left atrium (LA) after transseptal puncture (TSP), while fluoroscopy was performed on stand-by and locked-in. The pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed using a 3D mapping system, a multielectrode catheter, and a Smart Touch contact force (CF) sensing catheter, via the lead-apron-free (LAF) method, which is similar to the conventional ablation (CON) method., Results: This study enrolled 152 consecutive patients, with 72 and 80 patients in the LAF and CON groups, respectively. The LAF group demonstrated significantly lower values in total fluoroscopy time (6.9 vs. 14 min, P<0.001) and dose area product (DAP) values (15.4±12.1 vs. 31.5±17.4 G/m 2 , P<0.001) than the CON group. However, there was no significant difference in the total procedure time (83.6±21.1 vs. 77.2±11.4 min, P=0.12) between the two groups. Only four procedures (5.5%) required repositioning of the apron, and no complications were observed with the LAF method. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients., Conclusions: The LAF method reduced fluoroscopy use compared with CON, with no change in procedure time or efficacy.

Modified Barium Swallow Studies (MBSS) are a critical part of the evaluation, treatment planning, and outcome assessment for persons with swallowing disorders. Since MBSSs use ionizing radiation with associated cancer risks, many clinicians have reduced radiation exposure by reducing the fluoroscopic pulse rate. However, by reducing pulse rate, we also decrease the temporal resolution of MBSSs which has been shown in pilot studies to significantly reduce diagnostic accuracy. Two hundred MBSSs from patients routinely undergoing MBSS as standard of care conducted at 30 pulses per second (pps) using the Modified Barium Swallow Study Impairment Profile (MBSImP™) standardized administration protocol were selected. A stratified sampling method ensured that a full range of swallowing impairments (etiology, type, and severity) was represented. Recordings were down sampled from 30 pps to 15, 7.5, and 4 pps. MBSSs were rated using the MBSImP components and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score for each swallow. Percent agreement was calculated across raters for MBSImP and PAS scores by bolus type and volume. The Least-Squares Method was used for hypothesis testing. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful changes in scores of swallowing physiology and penetration/aspiration occurred when reducing pulse rate below 30pps. These changes were evident across bolus types and volumes. Given the impact on diagnostic accuracy and the low radiation risks to adults undergoing MBSSs, reducing pulse rate to 15pps or below is not aligned with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle and should not be used as a viable method to reduce radiation exposure from MBSSs., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To compare the image quality and X-ray exposure dose from EOSedge versus standard digital radiography (SDR) focused on the hip for replacement or prosthesis revision surgery., Materials & Methods: This prospective single centre study included 97 patients between November 2022 and April 2023. For preoperative assessment, SDR radiographs from frontal pelvic and hip profile were indispensable. Often, surgeon requested spine radiograph from EOSedge, to which we added frontal pelvic and hip profile. A radiologist with 4 years' experience established a score based on European guidelines to evaluate the EOSedge versus SDR image quality. Quality scores (QS) were compared using paired Student's t test. The entrance skin dose (ESD) and dose area product (DAP) of the images were recorded., Results: A total of 97 patients, including 49 women and 48 men (mean 68.10 years ± 13.28) were assessed. The QS EOSedge was significantly higher than the QS SDR , with differences of 1.34 ± 1.90 (p < 0.001) and 1.74 ± 1.90 (p < 0.001), respectively. The difference in total QS was 3.08 ± 3.48 (p < 0.001). The radiation delivered (ESD x DAP) by EOSedge was 29 times lower than that delivered by SDR for frontal pelvic imaging (0.35 ± 0.91 versus 10.20 ± 12.63; p < 0.001) and 17 times lower for hip profile imaging (0.41 ± 0.84 versus 6.91 ± 9.70; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: This study highlighted the superior image quality of EOSedge images focused on the pelvis and hip compared to SDR, with significantly less radiation exposure., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Poor ergonomic posture during interventional procedures might lead to increased physical discomfort and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Adjunctive equipment such as lead aprons (LAs) has been shown to increase ergonomic posture risk (EPR). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of StemRad MD (StemRad Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel), a weightless exoskeleton-based radiation protective ensemble, in reducing EPR on the operator using wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors., Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted at an academic hospital. Inertial measurement unit sensors were affixed to the upper back of 9 interventionalists to assess ergonomic risk posture during endovascular procedures while wearing a traditional LA or the StemRad MD radiation protection system. Total fluoroscopy time, procedure type, and ergonomic risk postures were recorded and analyzed., Results: Twenty-one cases were performed with StemRad MD and 30 with LAs. Mean procedure time for the StemRad MD procedures was 48.4±23.3 minutes (range: 24-106 min), and for LA procedures, it was 34.66±25.83 minutes (range: 6-100 min) (p=.060). The operators assumed low-risk ergonomic positions in 96.1% of StemRad MD cases and in 62.9% of LA cases (p=.001), and high-risk ergonomic positions in 0% and 6.2%, respectively (p=.80). Mean EPR score for StemRad MD was 1.16, and for the LA, it was 1.49 (p=.001)., Conclusions: StemRad MD significantly reduces the EPR to the torso compared with a LA-based radiation protection system., Clinical Impact: Poor ergonomic posture during interventional procedures might leas to work-related musculoskeletal disorders for healthcare workers. StemRad MD, a weightless, exoskeleton-based radiation protection system was shown to significantly reduce ergonomic posture risk to the torso compared to conventional lead aprons. This might lead to reduced physical discomfort for procedure-based specialists., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: B.Z. acts as chief medical officer for StemRad Inc., Tampa, Fl, USA. R.P.C. is employed by StemRad Inc., Tampa, FL, USA. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this article to disclose.

Objective: The International Commission on Radiological Protection has highlighted the large number of medical specialties that use fluoroscopy outside diagnostic imaging departments without radiation protection programmes for patients and staff. Vascular surgery is one of these specialties. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a complicated procedure requiring radiation protection guidance and optimisation. The recent EU Basic Safety Standards Directive requires the use and periodic updating of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for interventional procedures. The aim of this study was to determine doses for patients undergoing TEVAR with mobile Xray systems and hybrid rooms (fixed Xray systems) to obtain national DRLs and to suggest optimisation actions., Methods: This was a retrospective cross sectional study. The Spanish Chapter of Endovascular Surgery conducted a national survey in 11 autonomous communities representing around 77.6% of the Spanish population (47.33 million inhabitants). A total of 266 TEVAR procedures from 17 Spanish centres were analysed, of which 53.0% were performed in hybrid operating rooms. National DRLs were obtained and defined as the third quartile of the median values from the different participating centres., Results: The proposed national DRLs are: for kerma area product (KAP), 113.81 Gy·cm 2 for mobile Xray systems and 282.59 Gy·cm 2 for hybrid rooms; and for cumulative air kerma (CAK) at the patient entry reference point, 228.38 mGy for mobile systems and 910.64 mGy for hybrid rooms., Conclusion: Based on the requirement to know radiation doses for standard endovascular procedures, this study of TEVARs demonstrated that there is an increased factor of 2.48 in DRLs for KAP when the procedure is performed in a hybrid room compared with mobile C-arm systems, and an increased factor of 3.98 in DRLs for CAK when the procedure is performed with hybrid equipment. These results will help to optimise strategies to reduce radiation doses during TEVAR procedures., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the incidence (1 year) and the cumulative incidence (3 years) of the condition of patients accruing cumulative effective doses (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv and their variability among different hospitals. To establish and validate a reference level for the CED in patients with recurrent exposures (RERL) and provide a RERL value., Methods: Data of CT exposure was collected in 9 similar hospitals. The database included 294,222 patient*years who underwent 442,278 CT exams in 3 years. The incidence proportion of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv in a given year (I 100;1 ) and the 3-year cumulative incidence of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv over 3 consecutive years (I 100;3 ) were calculated and compared among different institutions., Results: I 100;1 ranged from a minimum of 0.1% to a maximum of 5.1%. The percentage of recurrent patients was quite uniform among centres ranging from 23 to 38%. The I 100;3 ranged from a minimum of 1.1 to 11.4%. There was a strong positive correlation between the third quartile values of yearly CED and yearly incidence (r = 0.90; R 2  = 0.81; p < 0.0001). RERL value in our study was found at 34.0 mSv., Conclusion: The management of patients with recurrent exposures is highly variable among hospitals leading to a 50-fold variation in I 100;1 and to a tenfold variation in I 100;3 . RERL could be established and used by taking as a RERL quantity the CED and as a RERL value the 75th percentile of the third quartiles of the distribution of the yearly CED obtained by surveying different hospitals., Clinical Relevance Statement: This is the first ever multicentre study that quantifies recurrent exposures in terms of incidence and cumulative incidence of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv. RERL establishment and use could benefit the optimisation of radioprotection of patients with recurrent exposures., Key Points: This is the first multicentre study estimating yearly incidence and 3-year cumulative incidence of patients with cumulative effective doses ≥ 100 mSv. In this study, a 50-fold inter centre variation between the maximum (5.1%) and the minimum value (0.1%) of yearly incidence of patients with cumulative effective doses ≥ 100 mSv was reported. The range of the 3-year cumulative incidence extended from 1.1 to 11.4% (a tenfold variation) The third quartile of the yearly cumulative effective doses in a centre showed a strong positive correlation with the yearly incidence of patients with cumulative effective doses ≥ 100 mSv, with a potential of being used to set reference levels for recurrent exposures., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Interventional echocardiography is a rapidly growing field within the disciplines of cardiology and anesthesiology, with the rise of advanced transcatheter procedures making skilled imagers more important than ever. However, these procedures also involve frequent manipulation of the transesophageal echocardiography probe, which means interventional echocardiographers (IEs) are at risk of long-term occupational radiation exposure. Studies have shown that radiation exposure is linked to various health issues, including cancer, cataracts, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, vascular aging, and early atherosclerosis. While there is increasing awareness of the occupational radiation dose limits and the need for better shielding methods, the importance of radiation safety for the IE is still not sufficiently prioritized in most cardiac catheterization laboratories/hybrid operating rooms. This is partly due to a paucity of studies looking at long-term radiation exposure to the IE, as this field is newer than that of interventional cardiologists., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To summarize dose trends from 1980 to 2020 for 19,651 U.S. Radiologic Technologists who reported assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures (FGIPs), overall and by work history characteristics., Materials and Methods: A total of 762,310 annual personal dose equivalents at a 10-mm reference depth (doses) during 1980-2020 for 43,823 participants of the U.S. Radiologic Technologists (USRT) cohort who responded to work history questionnaires administered during 2012-2014 were summarized. This population included 19,651 technologists who reported assisting with FGIP (≥1 time per month for ≥12 consecutive months) at any time during the study period. Doses corresponding to assistance with FGIP were estimated in terms of proximity to patients, monthly procedure frequency, and procedure type. Box plots and summary statistics (eg, medians and percentiles) were used to describe annual doses and dose trends., Results: Median annual dose corresponding to assistance with FGIP was 0.65 mSv (interquartile range [IQR], 0.60-1.40 mSv; 95th percentile, 6.80). Higher occupational doses with wider variability were associated with close proximity to patients during assistance with FGIP (median, 1.20 mSv [IQR, 0.60-4.18 mSv]; 95th percentile, 12.66), performing ≥20 FGIPs per month (median, 0.75 mSv [IQR, 0.60-2.40 mSv]; 95th percentile, 9.44), and assisting with high-dose FGIP (median, 0.70 mSv [IQR, 0.60-1.90 mSv]; 95th percentile, 8.30)., Conclusions: Occupational doses corresponding to assistance with FGIP were generally low but varied with exposure frequency, procedure type, and proximity to patients. These results highlight the need for vigilant dose monitoring, radiation safety training, and proper protective equipment., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel comprehensive shield designed to minimize radiation exposure (RE) to Physicians performing coronary and structural heart procedures., Background: The Protego™ radiation shielding system (Image Diagnostics Inc., Fitchburg, Ma) is designed to provide comprehensive protection from RE and has been State certified sufficient to allow operators to perform procedures without orthopedically burdensome lead aprons., Methods: This single center two-group cohort study assessed the efficacy of this shield in a large number of cardiac procedures (coronary and structural), comparing operator RE compared to standard protection methods (personal lead apparel and "drop down" shield)., Results: The Protego™ system reduced operator RE by 99 % compared to Standard Protection. RE was significantly lower at both "Head" level by thyroid median dose 0.0 (0.0, 0,0) vs 5.7 (2.9, 8.2) μSv (p < 0.001), as well as waist dose 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) vs 10.0 (5.0, 16.6) μSv (p < 0.001). "Zero" Total RE was documented by Raysafe™ in 64 % (n = 32) of TAVR cases and 73.2 % (n = 183) of the coronary cases utilizing Protego™. In contrast, standard protection did not achieve "Zero" exposure in a single case. These dramatic differences in RE were achieved despite higher fluoroscopy times in the Protego™ arm (11.9 ± 8.6 vs 14.3 ± 12.5 min, p = 0.015). Per case procedural exposure measured by Dose Area Product was higher in the Protego™ group compared to standard protection (115.4 ± 139.2 vs 74.9 ± 69.3, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The Protego™ shield provides total body RE protection for operators performing both coronary and structural heart procedures. This shield allows procedural performance without the need for personal lead aprons and has potential to reduce catheterization laboratory occupational health hazards., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest *JG is an owner of equity and Board Member of ECLS, Inc., which licenses technology to Image Diagnostics Inc., which manufactures and sells the Protego™ shield. No funding for this study was provided., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: At present, neurointerventional surgery requires angiographers to perform operations in the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) room. Ionising radiation and chronic joint damage are still unavoidable for angiographers. Therefore, we researched and developed a neurointerventional robot-assisted system, which is operated by angiographers in an operating room outside the DSA room. We have conducted a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted system in human cerebral angiography. In the future, this research will provide a platform for the research and development of an intelligent surgical system and bring revolutionary progress in neurointerventional surgery., Methods: From December 2020 to December 2021, 260 patients were enrolled from three medical centres, who were randomly and equally divided into a robot-assisted system group and a clinical routine cerebral angiography group. The success rate of angiography, the rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel, the operation time, X-ray radiation exposure and the incidence of related adverse events were compared between the two groups., Results: A total of 257 patients completed this trial; baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of angiography in both the control group and the experimental group was 100%. The rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel was 99.23% and 100.00% in the control and experimental groups, respectively. For the control versus experimental groups, the angiographic operation time was 48.59±25.60 min versus 47.94±27.49 min, respectively; the X-ray radiation dose was 735.01±554.77 mGy versus 821.65±705.45 mGy, respectively; and the incidence of adverse events was 23.44% versus 22.48%, respectively. No statistical differences were present between the two groups., Conclusion: The robot-assisted surgical system is more convenient for cerebral angiography and is as safe and effective as the traditional cerebral angiography., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Abstract: The linear no-threshold (LNT) model may be useful as a simple basis for developing radiation protection regulations and standards, but it bears little resemblance to scientific reality and is probably overly conservative at low doses and low dose rates. This paper is an appeal for a broader view of radiation protection that involves more than just optimization of radiation dose. It is suggested that the LNT model should be replaced with a risk-informed, targeted approach to limitation of overall risks, which include radiation and other types of risks and accidents/incidents. The focus should be on protection of the individual. Limitation of overall risk does not necessarily always equate to minimization of individual or collective doses, but in some cases it might. Instead, risk assessment (hazards analysis) should be performed for each facility/and or specific job or operation (straightforward for specialized work such as radiography), and this should guide how limited resources are used to protect workers and the public. A graded approach could be used to prioritize the most significant risks and identify exposure scenarios that are unlikely or non-existent. The dose limits would then represent an acceptable level of risk, below which no further reduction in dose would be needed. Less resources should be spent on ALARA and tracking small individual and collective doses. Present dose limits are thought to be conservative and should suffice in general. Two exceptions are possibly the need for a lower (lifetime) dose limit for lens of the eye for astronauts and raising the public limit to 5 mSv y -1 from 1 mSv y -1 . This would harmonize the public limit with the current limit for the embryo fetus of the declared pregnant worker. Eight case studies are presented that emphasize how diverse and complex radiation risks can be, and in some cases, chemical and industrial risks outweigh radiation risks. More focus is needed on prevention of accidents and incidents involving a variety of types of risks. A targeted approach is needed, and commitments should be complied with until they are changed or exemptions are granted. No criticism of regulators or nuclear industry personnel is intended here. Protection of workers and the public is everyone's goal. The question is how best to accomplish that., Competing Interests: The author declares no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Health Physics Society.)

Purpose: Fluoroscopy is usually required during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Although fluoroscopy is considered necessary for effective and safe RIRS, there is growing awareness regarding radiation exposure risk to patients and surgeons. We conducted a multicenter-based, randomized, controlled trial to compare the safety and effectiveness of radiation-free (RF) RIRS with radiation-usage (RU) RIRS for kidney stone management., Materials and Methods: From August 2020 to April 2022, patients with a unilateral kidney stone (≤20 mm) eligible for RIRS were prospectively enrolled in 5 tertiary medical centers after randomization and divided into the RF and RU groups. RIRS was performed using a flexible ureteroscope with a holmium:YAG laser. The primary end point of this study was the success rate, defined as complete stone-free or residual fragments with asymptomatic kidney stones ≤ 3 mm. The secondary end point of this study was ascertaining the safety of RF RIRS. The success rates were analyzed using a noninferiority test., Results: Of the 140 consecutive randomized participants, 128 patients completed this study (RF: 63; RU: 65). The success rates (78% vs 80%, P = .8) were not significantly different between the groups. The rate of high-grade (grade 2-4) ureter injury was not significantly higher in the RF group compared to the RU group (RF = 3 [4.8%] vs RU = 2 [3.1%], P = .6). In RF RIRS, the success rate was noninferior compared to RU RIRS (the difference was 2.2% [95% CI, 0.16-0.12])., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the surgical outcomes of RF RIRS were noninferior to RU RIRS.

Abstract: The process to arrive at the radiation protection practices of today to protect workers, patients, and the public, including sensitive populations, has been a long and deliberative one. This paper presents an overview of the US Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) responsibility in protecting human health and the environment from unnecessary exposure to radiation. The origins of this responsibility can be traced back to early efforts, a century ago, to protect workers from x rays and radium. The system of radiation protection we employ today is robust and informed by the latest scientific consensus. It has helped reduce or eliminate unnecessary exposures to workers, patients, and the public while enabling the safe and beneficial uses of radiation and radioactive material in diverse areas such as energy, medicine, research, and space exploration. Periodic reviews and analyses of research on health effects of radiation by scientific bodies such as the National Academy of Sciences, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, and the International Commission on Radiological Protection continue to inform radiation protection practices while new scientific information is gathered. As a public health agency, US EPA is keenly interested in research findings that can better elucidate the effects of exposure to low doses and low dose rates of radiation as applicable to protection of diverse populations from various sources of exposure. Professional organizations such as the Health Physics Society can provide radiation protection practitioners with continuing education programs on the state of the science and describe the key underpinnings of the system of radiological protection. Such efforts will help equip and prepare radiation protection professionals to more effectively communicate radiation health information with their stakeholders., (Copyright © 2024 Health Physics Society.)

Fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures, including gastrointestinal stenting, balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), are essential for diagnosis and treatment in gastroenterology. Such procedures involve radiation exposure that necessitates strict safety measures to protect patients, doctors, and medical staff. The April 2020 update to Japan's Ionizing Radiation Injury Prevention Regulations for occupational exposure reduced the lens exposure dose limit to approximately one-seventh of its previous level. This change highlights the need for improved safety protocols. Without adaptation, the sustainability of fluoroscopy-based endoscopic techniques could be at risk due to the potential to exceed these new limits. This review examines the current state of medical radiation exposure in the field of gastroenterology in Japan and discusses the findings of the REX-GI study., (© 2024. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.)

Objective: Ionizing radiation has long been used in the medical field. Catheter laboratories (cath labs) are recognized as areas where radiation exposure is notably high. This study aims to examine the levels of radiation exposure during various interventional procedures to raise awareness of this issue in Türkiye., Methods: This study evaluated the procedure radiation doses (n = 2804) in the cath labs of four public hospitals with distinct characteristics. Radiation dose evaluation was conducted using Cumulative Air Kerma (CAK). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, independent T-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient were utilized to analyze the data. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using IBM® Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) STATISTICS Version 26.0.0.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA)., Results: The procedure radiation doses in the cath labs were documented. The findings are largely consistent with the literature. Notably, several outlier cases with extremely high radiation doses were identified [CAK (min-max) = 0.12 - 9.9 Gy]. Procedures such as chronic total occlusion (CTO) [Mean CAK: 3.8 (± 1.5) Gy] and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) [Mean CAK: 1.5 (± 1.4) Gy] were associated with high doses. Additionally, personnel attitudes toward radiation optimization in cath labs were found to be inadequate., Conclusion: The incidence of high radiation exposure during interventional procedures may be higher than expected in Türkiye. Further research is necessary to identify predictors and implement preventive measures to reduce these rates. For this purpose, establishing diagnostic radiation reference levels (DRLs) could help monitor national radiation levels.

Objective: Radiation exposure during complex endovascular aortic repair may be associated with tangible adverse effects in patients and operators. This study aimed to identify the steps of highest radiation exposure during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) and to investigate potential intraoperative factors affecting radiation exposure., Methods: Prospective data of 31 consecutive patients managed exclusively with four-fenestration endografts between March 1, 2020, and July 1, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Leveraging the conformity of the applied technique, every FEVAR operation was considered a combination of six overall stages composed of 28 standardized steps. Intraoperative parameters, including air kerma, dose area product, fluoroscopy time, and number of digital subtraction angiographies (DSAs) and average angulations were collected and analyzed for each step., Results: The mean procedure duration and fluoroscopy time was 140 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 32 minutes), and 40 minutes (SD, 9.1 minutes), respectively. The mean air kerma was 814 mGy (SD, 498 mGy), and the mean dose area product was 66.8 Gy cm 2 (SD, 33 Gy cm 2 ). The percentage of air kerma of the entire procedure was distributed throughout the following procedure stages: preparation (13.9%), main body (9.6%), target vessel cannulation (27.8%), stent deployment (29.1%), distal aortoiliac grafting (14.3%), and completion (5.3%). DSAs represented 23.0% of the total air kerma. Target vessel cannulation and stent deployment presented the highest mean lateral angulation (67 and 63 degrees, respectively). Using linear regression, each minute of continuous fluoroscopy added 18.9 mGy of air kerma (95% confidence interval, 17.6-20.2 mGy), and each DSA series added 21.1 mGy of air kerma (95% confidence interval, 17.9-24.3 mGy). Body mass index and lateral angulation were significantly associated with increased air kerma (P < .001)., Conclusions: Cannulation of target vessels and bridging stent deployment are the steps requiring the highest radiation exposure during FEVAR cases. Optimized operator protection during these steps is mandatory., Competing Interests: Disclosures AR is a GE Healthcare employee. SH has intellectual property and is a consultant of Cook Medical, Bentley, and GE Healthcare., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Implantable central venous port systems are widely used in oncology. We upgraded our fluoroscopy machines, and all anesthetists completed two training courses focusing on the risks of ionizing radiation for patients and health workers., Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of upgrading the machines and the radiation-protection training on ionizing radiation exposure during venous port system implantation., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive venous port implantations between 2019 and 2022. The older fluoroscopy machines were replaced by two new machines. A first training session about health worker radioprotection was organized. The medical staff completed a second training course focused on protecting patients from ionizing radiation. We defined four distinct time intervals (TI): venous port implantations performed with the old equipment, the new fluoroscopy machines, after the first training course, and after the second training course. The air kerma-area product (KAP) was compared between these four TI and fluoroscopy times and the number of exposures only with the new machines., Results: We analyzed 2587 procedures. A 93% decrease in the median KAP between the first and last TI was noted (median KAP = 323.0 mGy.cm 2 vs. 24.0 mGy.cm 2 , p < 0.0001). A decrease in the KAP was observed for each of the 11 anesthetists. We also noted a significant decrease in the time of fluoroscopy and the number of exposures., Conclusions: Upgrading the fluoroscopy equipment and completing two dedicated training courses allowed for a drastic decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation during venous access port implantation by non-radiologist practitioners., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.)

Abstract: The system of radiological protection has been based on linear no-threshold theory and related dose-response models for health detriment (in part related to cancer induction) by ionizing radiation exposure for almost 70 y. The indicated system unintentionally promotes radiation phobia, which has harmed many in relationship to the Fukushima nuclear accident evacuations and led to some abortions following the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Linear no-threshold model users (mainly epidemiologists) imply that they can reliably assess the cancer excess relative risk (likely none) associated with tens or hundreds of nanogray (nGy) radiation doses to an organ (e.g., bone marrow); for 1,000 nGy, the excess relative risk is 1,000 times larger than that for 1 nGy. They are currently permitted this unscientific view (ignoring evolution-related natural defenses) because of the misinforming procedures used in data analyses of which many radiation experts are not aware. One such procedure is the intentional and unscientific vanishing of the excess relative risk uncertainty as radiation dose decreases toward assigned dose zero (for natural background radiation exposure). The main focus of this forum article is on correcting the serious error of discarding risk uncertainty and the impact of the correction. The result is that the last defense of the current system of radiological protection relying on linear no-threshold theory (i.e., epidemiologic studies implied findings of harm from very low doses) goes away. A revised system is therefore needed., (Copyright © 2024 Health Physics Society.)

Aims: The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Scientific Initiatives Committee performed a global survey on radiation exposure in interventional echocardiography. The survey aimed to collect data on local practices for radioprotection in interventional echocardiography and to assess the awareness of echocardiography operators about radiation-related risks., Methods and Results: A total of 258 interventional echocardiographers from 52 different countries (48% European) responded to the survey. One hundred twenty-two (47%) participants were women. Two-thirds (76%) of interventional echocardiographers worked in tertiary care/university hospitals. Interventional echocardiography was the main clinical activity for 34% of the survey participants. The median time spent in the cath-lab for the echocardiographic monitoring of structural heart procedures was 10 (5-20) hours/month. Despite this, only 28% of interventional echocardiographers received periodic training and certification in radioprotection and 72% of them did not know their annual radiation dose. The main adopted personal protection devices were lead aprons and thyroid collars (95% and 92% of use, respectively). Dedicated architectural protective shielding was not available for 33% of interventional echocardiographers. Nearly two-thirds of responders thought that the radiation exposure of interventional echocardiographers was higher than that of interventional cardiologists and 72% claimed for an improvement in the radioprotection measures., Conclusion: Radioprotection measures for interventional echocardiographers are widely variable across centres. Radioprotection devices are often underused by interventional echocardiographers, portending an increased radiation-related risk. International scientific societies working in the field should collaborate to endorse radioprotection training, promote reliable radiation dose assessment, and support the adoption of radioprotection shielding dedicated to interventional echocardiographers., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Victoria Delgado received speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare, JenaValve, Medtronic, Novartis and Philips and consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, MSD and Novo-Nordisk. Elena Galli received speakers’ fees from BMS. Luna Gargani received consulting fees from Caption Health and Sanofy and writing fees from Piccin. Nina Ajmone Marsan received speaker’s fees from GE Healthcare, Philips Ultrasound, Abbott Vascular, Omron, Pfizer. Denisa Muraru received speakers’ fees from GE Healthcare, Philips, Bristol-Myers Squibb. Steffen Petersen received consulting fees from Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Inc., Calgary, Canada. Piotr Szymanski received speakers’ fees from Novartis and Samsung., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Competing Interests: None declared.

Background: ECG-gated cardiac CT is now widely used in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD). Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) could improve image quality while minimizing the radiation dose., Objectives: To define the potential dose reduction using DLIR with an anthropomorphic phantom., Method: An anthropomorphic pediatric phantom was scanned with an ECG-gated cardiac CT at four dose levels. Images were reconstructed with an iterative and a deep-learning reconstruction algorithm (ASIR-V and DLIR). Detectability of high-contrast vessels were computed using a mathematical observer. Discrimination between two vessels was assessed by measuring the CT spatial resolution. The potential dose reduction while keeping a similar level of image quality was assessed., Results: DLIR-H enhances detectability by 2.4% and discrimination performances by 20.9% in comparison with ASIR-V 50. To maintain a similar level of detection, the dose could be reduced by 64% using high-strength DLIR in comparison with ASIR-V50., Conclusion: DLIR offers the potential for a substantial dose reduction while preserving image quality compared to ASIR-V., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study reports the development of an innovative, interactive Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) teaching radiation safety principles in the vascular workplace, using stepwise e-learning with multiple choice question tests (MCQs), educational videos, and a serious game. The aim was to study the MOOC impact on radiation safety knowledge and assess its feasibility and acceptability., Methods: An international multicentre prospective study included team members active in the hybrid operating room. The MOOC was offered voluntarily via a secure online learning platform. A standardised MCQ test (15 questions) assessed radiation safety knowledge pre- and post-course (range 0 - 100%). Acceptability and feasibility were tested via the previously validated, Evaluating e-learning system success (EESS) model, using five point Likert scales., Results: In eight centres across four countries, 150 of 203 invited endovascular team members consented. Over a seven week study period, surgeons (28%, including vascular surgery trainees and consultants), nurses (27%, including scrub, circulating and anaesthetic nurses), anaesthetists (43%, including trainees and consultants), and radiographers (3%) participated. Of those, 67% completed the course. The average radiation knowledge improved by 22.8% (95% CI 19.5 - 26.0%; p < .001) after MOOC completion, from 48% to 71% (standard deviation [SD] 14 and 15% respectively), requiring a mean time investment of 169 minutes (SD 89 minutes). In centres with a radiographer, mean knowledge gain after MOOC completion was significantly smaller (14%, SD 19% vs. 24%, SD 16%, p = .036). The course was deemed feasible and acceptable according to the EESS model with a total mean score of 3.68/5., Conclusion: This newly developed, multimodal MOOC was deemed feasible and effective across multiple international centres. The MOOC significantly contributes to radiation safety education of the entire endovascular team, improving radiation safety knowledge. The course may optimise workplace radiation safety behaviour and therefore enhance team and patient safety., (Copyright © 2023 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Epicutaneo-caval catheters (ECCs) are essential for the care of sick infants who require long-term medical and nutritional management. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of real-time ultrasound as an alternative to X-rays to reduce the incidence of primary malpositions during catheter insertion., Study Design: Data on ECCs were retrospectively collected in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Catheter were analyzed considering the tip location technique (standard chest-abdominal radiograph vs real-time ultrasound) RESULTS:  A total of 248 ECCs were analyzed. Of these, 118 catheters had primary malposition (47.6%). The tip of 165 catheters was assessed using standard chest-abdominal X-rays and 107 (64.8%) were found to be in an inappropriate location. In the group of 83 catheters that were placed using real-time ultrasound for tip location, only 11 catheters (13.2%) had primary malposition. The rate of malposition among the two groups showed a statistically significant difference ( p  < 0.001). Hypothetically, 300 chest X-rays could have been saved if real-time ultrasound had been used to locate the tip, reducing radiation exposure to infants., Conclusion: The use of a real-time ultrasound may be beneficial in reducing primary catheter malpositions compared with conventional radiography. In addition, secondary malpositions and catheter-related complications can be monitored over time., Key Points: · Conventional radiology cannot be considered the "gold standard" for ECC tip location.. · Ultrasound is more accurate and reduces insertion time reducing the rate of primary malposition.. · Ultrasound can be performed in real time and it is the best technique for ECC tip location in infants.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation has become standard treatment for cerebrospinal fluid diversion, besides endoscopic third ventriculostomy for certain indications. Postoperative X-ray radiography series of skull, chest and abdomen combined with cranial CT are obtained routinely in many institutions to document the shunt position and valve settings in adult patients. Measures to reduce postoperative radiation exposure are needed, however, there is only limited experience with such efforts. Here, we aim to compare routine postoperative cranial CT plus conventional radiography series (retrospective arm) with cranial CT and body scout views only (prospective arm) concerning both diagnostic quality and radiation exposure., Patients and Methods: After introduction of an enhanced CT imaging protocol, routine skull and abdomen radiography was no longer obtained after VP shunt surgery. The image studies of 25 patients with routine postoperative cranial CT and conventional radiography (retrospective arm of study) were then compared to 25 patients with postoperative cranial CT and CT body scout views (prospective arm of study). Patient demographics such as age, sex and primary diagnosis were collected. The image quality of conventional radiographic images and computed tomography scout views images were independently analyzed by one neurosurgeon and one neuroradiologist., Results: There were no differences in quality assessments according to three different factors determined by two independent investigators for both groups. There was a statistically significant difference, however, between the conventional radiography series group and the CT body scout view imaging group with regard to radiation exposure. The effective dose estimation calculation yielded a difference of 0.05 mSv (two-tailed t-test, p = 0.044) in favor of CT body scout view imaging. Furthermore, the new enhanced protocol resulted in a reduction of cost and the use of human resources., Conclusion: CT body scout view imaging provides sufficient imaging quality to determine shunt positioning and valve settings. With regard to radiation exposure and costs, we suggest that conventional postoperative shunt series may be abandoned., Competing Interests: Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)