6 results on '"Rada, Norinsky"'
Search Results
2. Generation of Mouse Model (KI and CKO) via Easi-CRISPR
- Author
-
Dorjee T N, Shola, Chingwen, Yang, Chiayun, Han, Rada, Norinsky, and Ruben D, Peraza
- Subjects
Gene Editing ,Male ,Mice, Knockout ,Zygote ,DNA, Single-Stranded ,Exons ,Mice, Inbred C57BL ,Mice ,Genes, Reporter ,Models, Animal ,Animals ,Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats ,Female ,Gene Knock-In Techniques ,CRISPR-Cas Systems ,RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida - Abstract
Recent development of Easi-CRISPR (Efficient additions with ssDNA inserts-CRISPR) that utilizes long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) of 0.2-2 kbases in length as donor templates to insert large segments of novel DNA sequences or to replace endogenous genes at precise locations in the genome has enabled CRISPR-assisted genome editing to make strides toward a more simple and rapid workflow. By leveraging the notion that short single-stranded DNA oligo (200 bases) serves as efficient donor in mouse zygotes for facilitating HDR-mediated genome editing, Easi-CRISPR expands to use lssDNA as the donor which accelerates the timeline to as little as 2 months for creating most types of genetically engineered mouse models (F0). Our lab (CGERC) has adopted Easi-CRISPR for multiple loci to generate mouse models over the past three plus years since its introduction. Here, we use two genes as examples to illustrate a step-by-step protocol for generating two commonly used models, including a knock-in (insertion of a reporter gene plus GOI) as well as a conditional knock-out model (via exon floxing). This protocol will focus more on molecular biology aspect, particularly we demonstrate two recently developed methods for lssDNA procuration: (1) PCR-based Takara Bio kit with modifications; (2) plasmid-retrieval-based CRISPR-CLIP (CRISPR-Clipped LssDNA via Incising Plasmid). Both methods are devised to retain sequence fidelity in lssDNA generated. In addition, CRISPR-CLIP directly retrieves lssDNA from DNA plasmid without using restriction enzymes through a PCR-free system hence carries virtually no restriction on sequence complexity, further mitigating limitations discussed in the original Easi-CRISPR protocol. We have alternated the use between both methods when suitable and successfully generated lssDNA templates via CRISPR-CLIP up to 3.5 kbases patched with multiple highly repetitive sequences, which is otherwise challenging to maneuver. Along with certain other modified workflow presented herein, Easi-CRISPR can be adapted to be more straightforward while applicable to generate mouse models in broader scope. (Certain figures and text passages presented in this chapter are reproduced from Shola et al. (The CRISPR J 3(2):109-122, 2020), published by Mary Ann Libert, Inc).
- Published
- 2021
3. Generation of Mouse Model (KI and CKO) via Easi-CRISPR
- Author
-
Chiayun Han, Ruben D Peraza, Rada Norinsky, Dorjee T.N. Shola, and Chingwen Yang
- Subjects
Computer science ,Endogeny ,Locus (genetics) ,Computational biology ,Genome ,Insert (molecular biology) ,DNA sequencing ,Genome engineering ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Exon ,0302 clinical medicine ,Plasmid ,Genome editing ,CRISPR ,Gene ,Floxing ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Reporter gene ,Zygote ,Restriction enzyme ,chemistry ,Genetically Engineered Mouse ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,DNA - Abstract
Recent development of Easi-CRISPR (Efficient additions with ssDNA inserts-CRISPR) that utilizes long single-stranded DNA (lssDNA) of 0.2-2 kbases in length as donor templates to insert large segments of novel DNA sequences or to replace endogenous genes at precise locations in the genome has enabled CRISPR-assisted genome editing to make strides toward a more simple and rapid workflow. By leveraging the notion that short single-stranded DNA oligo (
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Dissection and function of autoimmunity-associated TNFAIP3 (A20) gene enhancers in humanized mouse models
- Author
-
Mark P. Liber, Sung Ho Park, Tania Pannellini, Upneet K. Sokhi, Laura Frye, Lionel B. Ivashkiv, Shiaoching Gong, Rada Norinsky, Kyuho Kang, and Baohong Zhao
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Male ,Science ,Transgene ,General Physics and Astronomy ,Autoimmunity ,Mice, Transgenic ,Biology ,medicine.disease_cause ,Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Article ,Autoimmune Diseases ,Arthritis, Rheumatoid ,03 medical and health sciences ,Gene expression ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Genetic Predisposition to Disease ,skin and connective tissue diseases ,lcsh:Science ,Enhancer ,Gene ,Cells, Cultured ,Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3 ,Regulation of gene expression ,Mice, Knockout ,Multidisciplinary ,Base Sequence ,HEK 293 cells ,General Chemistry ,Cell biology ,Mice, Inbred C57BL ,030104 developmental biology ,Enhancer Elements, Genetic ,HEK293 Cells ,Gene Expression Regulation ,Humanized mouse ,lcsh:Q ,Female - Abstract
Enhancers regulate gene expression and have been linked with disease pathogenesis. Little is known about enhancers that regulate human disease-associated genes in primary cells relevant for pathogenesis. Here we use BAC transgenics and genome editing to dissect, in vivo and in primary immune cells, enhancers that regulate human TNFAIP3, which encodes A20 and is linked with autoimmune diseases. A20 expression is dependent on a topologically associating subdomain (sub-TAD) that harbors four enhancers, while another >20 enhancers in the A20 locus are redundant. This sub-TAD contains cell- and activation-specific enhancers, including an enhancer (termed TT>A) harboring a proposed causal SLE-associated SNV. Deletion of the sub-TAD or the TT>A enhancer results in enhanced inflammatory responses, autoantibody production, and inflammatory arthritis, thus establishing functional importance in vivo and linking enhancers with a specific disease phenotype. These findings provide insights into enhancers that regulate human A20 expression to prevent inflammatory pathology and autoimmunity., The human TNFAIP3 gene, which encodes for A20, is associated with autoimmune diseases. Here, the authors use BAC transgenics combined with CRISPR- and recombineering-mediated genome editing to dissect in vivo and in primary immune cells, the role of enhancers regulating TNFAIP3.
- Published
- 2018
5. [Untitled]
- Author
-
Rada Norinsky, Weilan Ho, Samprit Chatterjee, Qiuxia Guo, Kasia Losos, Anna B. Auerbach, and Alexandra L. Joyner
- Subjects
Genetically modified mouse ,Genetics ,Transgene ,Embryo ,Biology ,Embryo transfer ,Cell biology ,Transgenesis ,Human fertilization ,embryonic structures ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Microinjection ,Biotechnology ,Transgenic Mouse Facility - Abstract
Transgenic mouse production via pronuclear microinjection is a complex process consisting of a number of sequential steps. Many different factors contribute to the effectiveness of each step and thus influence the overall efficiency of transgenic mouse production. The response of egg donor females to superovulation, the fertilization rate, egg survival after injection, ability of manipulated embryos to implant and develop to term, and concentration and purity of the injected DNA all contribute to transgenic production efficiency. We evaluated and compared the efficiency of transgenic mouse production using four different egg donor mouse strains: B6D2/F1 hybrids, Swiss Webster (SW) outbred, and inbred FVB/N and C57BL/6. The data included experiments involving ∼350 DNA transgene constructs performed by a high capacity core transgenic mouse facility. Significant influences of particular genetic backgrounds on the efficiency of different steps of the production process were found. Except for egg production, FVB/N mice consistently produced the highest efficiency of transgenic mouse production at each step of the process. B6D2/F2 hybrid eggs are also quite efficient, but lyze more frequently than FVB/N eggs after DNA microinjection. SW eggs on the other hand block at the 1-cell stage more often than eggs from the other strains. Finally, using C57BL/6 eggs the main limiting factor is that the fetuses derived from injected eggs do not develop to term as often as the other strains. Based on our studies, the procedure for transgenic mouse production can be modified for each egg donor strain in order to overcome any deficiencies, and thus to increase the overall efficiency of transgenic mouse production.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Strain-dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production
- Author
-
Anna B, Auerbach, Rada, Norinsky, Weilan, Ho, Kasia, Losos, Qiuxia, Guo, Samprit, Chatterjee, and Alexandra L, Joyner
- Subjects
Male ,Microinjections ,Mice, Inbred Strains ,Mice, Transgenic ,DNA ,Embryo Transfer ,Mice, Inbred C57BL ,Mice ,Fertility ,Pregnancy ,Oocytes ,Animals ,Female ,Ovum - Abstract
Transgenic mouse production via pronuclear microinjection is a complex process consisting of a number of sequential steps. Many different factors contribute to the effectiveness of each step and thus influence the overall efficiency of transgenic mouse production. The response of egg donor females to superovulation, the fertilization rate, egg survival after injection, ability of manipulated embryos to implant and develop to term, and concentration and purity of the injected DNA all contribute to transgenic production efficiency. We evaluated and compared the efficiency of transgenic mouse production using four different egg donor mouse strains: B6D2/F1 hybrids, Swiss Webster (SW) outbred, and inbred FVB/N and C57BL/6. The data included experiments involving approximately 350 DNA transgene constructs performed by a high capacity core transgenic mouse facility. Significant influences of particular genetic backgrounds on the efficiency of different steps of the production process were found. Except for egg production, FVB/N mice consistently produced the highest efficiency of transgenic mouse production at each step of the process. B6D2/F2 hybrid eggs are also quite efficient, but lyze more frequently than FVB/N eggs after DNA microinjection. SW eggs on the other hand block at the 1-cell stage more often than eggs from the other strains. Finally, using C57BL/6 eggs the main limiting factor is that the fetuses derived from injected eggs do not develop to term as often as the other strains. Based on our studies, the procedure for transgenic mouse production can be modified for each egg donor strain in order to overcome any deficiencies, and thus to increase the overall efficiency of transgenic mouse production.
- Published
- 2003
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.