Search

We describe a patient who had primary glioblastoma (GB) and malignant melanoma (MM). A 78‐year‐old man presented with several weeks to months of history of gait disturbance, confusion, memory disturbance, and worsening speech. Imaging studies performed on admission revealed a large frontotemporal lobe mass associated with the surrounding zone of vasogenic edema. Given the patient's medical history of incomplete biopsy of a midback tumor performed three weeks before, the presumptive clinical diagnosis was metastatic MM. Pathological examination of frozen sections of fragmented specimens obtained at stereotactic biopsy performed on admission revealed a high‐grade malignant neoplasm characterized by discohesive cells in a blue myxoid background and abundant foci of tumor necrosis. Given these features, in conjunction with the abovementioned pathological report, the frozen section diagnosis by the neuropathologist was "neoplasm identified, favor melanoma." Due to the paucity of lesional tissue, a limited immunohistochemistry performed on the permanent sections revealed positive staining of lesional cells for Sox10 alone using a multiplex MART1/Sox10 immunostain and S‐100 protein, an immunohistochemical profile supporting the presumptive frozen section diagnosis. A tumor debulk procedure, performed two weeks later, revealed histopathologic features most compatible with GB, IDH wild‐type. Thus, additional immunohistochemistry on the permanent sections revealed positive staining of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), Sox10, and S‐100 protein as well as negative staining of gp100, a complex carbohydrate matrix protein in embryonic melanosomes, using a specific antibody HMB45. The concomitant occurrence of MM and GB in our patient underscores the association between these two entities. Our literature review suggests that the sporadic co‐occurrence of these two conditions is likely not serendipitous. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many studies have shown the effectiveness of electrical stimulation of the periventricular gray matter (PVG) (1-6) and various areas of the thalamus or internal capsule (7-9) for relief of chronic [...]

Background and Objective: Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA) Medical Centers play a crucial role in training neurosurgery residents. Although previous studies have examined the impact of VA rotations from the attending perspective, the resident experience remains unexplored. We present a national survey of neurosurgery residents to assess their perceptions of VA rotations, focusing on operative experience, call burden, longitudinal patient care experiences, and overall strengths and limitations., Methods: A 33-question survey was distributed by email to all neurosurgery residents who had previously completed a VA rotation within the past 7 years., Results: Responses were received from 77 residents, representing 36 out of 40 neurosurgical residency programs with an active VA rotation. Most residents (79.2%) found their VA rotations adequate in length, having spent a median of 5 months at the VA. Residents completed an average of 11.7 (SD 7.2) cases per month while at the VA, including 8.9 (SD 5.5) spine, 1.7 (SD 2.0) cranial, and 1.4 (SD 1.6) peripheral nerve cases. Many residents reported completing a greater proportion of spine and peripheral nerve cases at the VA compared with their primary clinical sites. Across all postgraduate years, residents felt that the VA offered increased operative autonomy (79.0% agreement) at the expense of total operative volume (98.7% agreement) and complexity (81.9% agreement). Importantly, 94.8% of residents participated in longitudinal patient care experiences, and 59.7% followed all patients longitudinally., Conclusion: The resident experience at the VA varies, presenting both strengths and limitations. Addressing these factors could enhance the overall effectiveness of VA rotations in neurosurgical training programs in the future., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)