Search

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None.

To help increase the supply and retention of rural family physicians, Thomas Jefferson University initiated the Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) in 1974. The program selectively admits medical school applicants who both grew up in a rural area and plan to practice in a rural area. During medical school, PSAP students have ongoing mentoring and rural clinical experiences. As the program now approaches the half-century mark, this commentary summarizes several important lessons learned. First, outcomes research is critical, and program leaders have been able to publish 15 papers and a book about the PSAP and its outcomes. Second, these studies have shown that the program has been highly successful, with PSAP graduates 8.5-9.9 times more likely to enter rural family medicine than their peers, and that the PSAP contributed 12% of all rural family physicians in Pennsylvania. Other similar medical school rural programs have had comparable success, with more than half of all graduates combined (including PSAP graduates) practicing rural. Third, long-term retention has a multiplicative impact. Long-term retention of PSAP graduates in rural family medicine was greater than 70% after 20-25 years. Fourth, research has shown that the admissions component accounted for approximately three-quarters of the PSAP's success. Three factors available at the time of matriculation (rural background, plans for rural practice, and plans for family medicine) identified almost 80% of all Jefferson graduates in rural practice 3 decades later. Having a peer group with similar backgrounds, mentoring, and the rural curriculum were also very important. Fifth, wanting to live rural appears key to the rural practice decision. Finally, given that medical school programs like the PSAP produce substantial increases in the supply and retention of rural physicians while requiring modest resources, medical schools can have a critical role in addressing the rural physician shortage., (Copyright © 2022 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.)

Background: The Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) of Jefferson Medical College (JMC) is one of a small number of comprehensive medical school rural programs that has been successful in increasing the supply of family physicians practicing in rural areas. Although retention is a critical component of the rural physician supply, published long-term outcomes are limited., Methods: Of the 1937 JMC graduates from the classes of 1978 to 1986, we identified those who were practicing family medicine in a rural county when they were first located in practice (in 1986 for 1978-1981 graduates and in 1991 for 1982-1986 graduates). Using the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, we then compared the numbers of PSAP and non-PSAP graduates who were still practicing family medicine in the same area in 2011., Results: Of the 92 JMC graduates initially practicing rural family medicine, 90 were alive in 2011, and specialty and location data were available for 89 (98.9%). Of the 37 PSAP graduates who originally practiced rural family medicine, 26 (70.3%) were still practicing family medicine in the same rural area in 2011 compared with 24 of 52 non-PSAP graduates (46.2%; P = .02)., Conclusion: This study provides additional support for the substantial impact of medical school rural programs, suggesting that graduates of rural programs are not only likely to enter rural family medicine but to remain in rural practice for decades.

Purpose: To analyze the previously unknown relationships between the specialty plans of entering medical students and their eventual rural practice outcomes., Method: For 5,419 graduates from the 1978-2002 classes of Jefferson Medical College, their self-reported specialty plans at the time of matriculation were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, as were their 2007 practice locations. Specialty plans were grouped into 12 categories, and the percentages of graduates initially planning each specialty group who were actually practicing in rural areas were determined., Results: Entering medical students' specialty plans were strongly related to eventual rural practice (P < .001). Those students planning family medicine were "highly likely" to practice in rural areas (29.4%, 238/810). They were 1.5 times as likely to practice rural as a "mid-likely" group (those planning general surgery, psychiatry, emergency medicine, general internal medicine, or one of the medical subspecialties: 19.6% [range 17.9%-21.0%], 229/1,167). Students planning family medicine were also 2.1 times as likely to practice rural as those students planning a "lower-likely" group (those planning general pediatrics, one of the surgical subspecialties, the hospital specialties of radiology, anesthesiology and pathology, and obstetrics-gynecology, or other specialties: 14.0% [range 13.0%-14.3%], 142/1,016)., Conclusions: These findings show that students' specialty plans at medical school matriculation are significantly related to rural outcomes, and they provide new information quantifying the absolute and relative likelihood of those planning various specialties to enter rural practice. This information is particularly important for medical schools that have or plan to develop comprehensive rural programs.

Purpose: Although many studies have investigated predictors of physician practice in rural areas, few have accounted for the importance of physicians' backgrounds. This study analyzed the relationship between the backgrounds and future career plans of entering medical students and their rural practice outcomes., Method: For 1,111 graduates from Jefferson Medical College (JMC, classes of 1978-1982), three factors self-reported at matriculation and previously related to rural practice were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study of Medical Education: growing up rural, planning rural practice, and planning family medicine. Their 2007 practice location was determined to be in a rural versus nonrural area. Analyses of graduates with various numbers of predictive factors (0-3) and rural practice were performed., Results: Of the 762 JMC graduates (69%) with complete data, 172 (23%) were practicing in rural areas. Of graduates with all three predictors, 45% (45/99) practiced in rural areas compared with 33% (48/145) of those with two predictors, 21% (42/198) with one predictor, and 12% (37/320) of those with none. Of physicians practicing in rural areas in 2007, only 22% had no predictors., Conclusions: Three factors known at the time of medical school matriculation have a powerful relationship with rural practice three decades later. Relatively few students without predictors practice in rural areas, which is particularly significant given subsequent factors known to be related to rural practice--for instance, rural curriculum, residency location, or spouse. These results have major implications for the role of the medical school admissions process in producing rural physicians.

Purpose: Comprehensive medical school rural programs (RPs) have made demonstrable contributions to the rural physician workforce, but their relative impact is uncertain. This study compares rural primary care practice outcomes for RP graduates within relevant states with those of international medical graduates (IMGs), also seen as ameliorating rural physician shortages., Method: Using data from the 2010 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, the authors identified all 1,757 graduates from three RPs (Jefferson Medical College's Physician Shortage Area Program; University of Minnesota Medical School Duluth; University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford's Rural Medical Education Program) practicing in their respective states, and all 6,474 IMGs practicing in the same states and graduating the same years. The relative likelihoods of RP graduates versus IMGs practicing rural family medicine and rural primary care were compared., Results: RP graduates were 10 times more likely to practice rural family medicine than IMGs (relative risk [RR] = 10.0, confidence interval [CI] 8.7-11.6, P < .001) and almost 4 times as likely to practice any rural primary care specialty (RR 3.8, CI 3.5-4.2, P < .001). Overall, RPs produced more rural family physicians than the IMG cohort (376 versus 254)., Conclusions: Despite their relatively small size, RPs had a significant impact on rural family physician and primary care supply compared with the much larger cohort of IMGs. Wider adoption of the RP model would substantially increase access to care in rural areas compared with increasing reliance on IMGs or unfocused expansion of traditional medical schools.

Background: Women physicians are less likely then men to practice in rural areas. With women representing an increasing proportion of physicians, there is concern that this could exacerbate the rural physician shortage. The Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) of Jefferson Medical College (JMC) is one of a small number of medical school rural programs shown to be successful in addressing the rural physician shortage; however, little is known about their specific impact on women., Methods: For 2394 physicians from the 1992 to 2002 JMC graduating classes, the 2007 practice location and specialty for PSAP and non-PSAP graduates were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study. The relative likelihood of PSAP versus non-PSAP graduates practicing in rural areas was determined for women and men and compared., Results: Women PSAP graduates were more than twice as likely as non-PSAP women to practice in rural areas (31.7% vs 12.3%; relative risk, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.2). This was similar to the PSAP outcomes for men (51.8% vs 17.7%; relative risk, 2.9, 95% CI, 2.2-3.9; relative risk ratio, 0.9, 95% CI, 0.5-1.5). PSAP outcomes were also similar for women and men practicing rural family medicine and rural primary care., Conclusion: These results provide support that medical school rural programs have the potential to help address the serious shortage of women physicians in rural areas, thereby increasing access to care for those living there.

Purpose: The shortage of primary care physicians in rural areas is an enduring problem with serious implications for access to care. Although studies have previously shown that medical school rural programs-such as Jefferson Medical College's Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP)-significantly increase the rural workforce, determining whether these programs continue to be successful is important., Method: The authors obtained, from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, the 2007 practice location and specialty for the 2,394 PSAP and non-PSAP graduates of 11 previously unreported Jefferson graduating classes (1992-2002). They determined the relative likelihood both of PSAP versus non-PSAP graduates practicing rural family medicine and of all PSAP versus non-PSAP graduates practicing in Pennsylvania's rural counties., Results: PSAP graduates were much more likely both to practice rural family medicine than their non-PSAP peers (32.0% [31/97] versus 3.2% [65/2,004]; relative risk [RR] = 9.9, confidence interval [CI] 6.8-14.4, P < .001) and to practice any specialty in rural Pennsylvania (PSAP 24.7% [24/97] versus non-PSAP 2.0% [40/2,004]; RR = 12.4, CI 7.8-19.7, P < .001)., Conclusions: Despite major changes in health care in recent decades, Jefferson's PSAP continues to represent a successful model for substantially increasing the supply and distribution of rural family physicians. Especially with the forthcoming expansion in health insurance, access to care for rural residents will require an increased supply of providers. These results may also be important for medical schools planning to develop similar rural programs, given the new Rural Physician Training Grants program.

Purpose: To systematically review the outcomes of comprehensive medical school programs designed to increase the rural physician supply, and to develop a model to estimate the impact of their widespread replication., Method: Relevant databases were searched, from the earliest available date to October 2006, to identify comprehensive programs (with available rural outcomes), that is, those that had (1) a primary goal of increasing the rural physician supply, (2) a defined cohort of students, and (3) either a focused rural admissions process or an extended rural clinical curriculum. Descriptive methodology, definitions, and outcomes were extracted. A model of the impact of replicating this type of program at 125 allopathic medical schools was then developed., Results: Ten studies met all inclusion criteria. Outcomes were available for more than 1,600 graduates across three decades from six programs. The weighted average of graduates practicing in rural areas ranged from 53% to 64%, depending on the definition of rural. If 125 medical schools developed similar programs for 10 students per class, this would result in approximately 11,390 rural physicians during the next decade, more than double the current estimation of rural doctors produced during that time frame (5,130)., Conclusions: All identified comprehensive medical school rural programs have produced a multifold increase in the rural physician supply, and widespread replication of these models could have a major impact on access to health care in thousands of rural communities. The current recommendation to expand U.S. medical school class size represents a unique and timely opportunity to replicate these programs.

Purpose: We wanted to analyze National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards to departments of family medicine., Methods: We obtained the list of NIH awards to departments of family medicine in 2003, and collected additional information from the Internet regarding each principal investigator (PI), including whether he or she worked primarily in a core (central) organizational component within a family medicine department., Results: One hundred forty-nine NIH awards were granted to 45 departments of family medicine, for a total of 60,085,000 dollars. Of 146 awards with a designated PI, approximately two thirds of awards (89, 61%) and awarded dollars (39,850,000 dollars, 70%) went to PIs who were either not full-time family medicine faculty primarily working in family medicine departments, or they were not working in core family medicine organizational components. Few awards to physician PIs in these non-core areas were to family physicians (4 of 37, 11%), whereas most awards to physician PIs in core family medicine areas went to family physicians (40 of 45, 89%). In contrast, most K awards (research career programs) went to PIs in core areas (19 of 23, 83%), and most to family physicians (17 of 23, 74%). Nationally, only 17 R01 awards (research project, traditional) went to family physicians., Conclusions: Most NIH awards to family medicine departments went to PIs in noncore organizational components, where most physician PIs were not family physicians. Family medicine departments interested in increasing NIH funding may want to consider 4 models that appear to exist: individual faculty in core departmental components, K awards, core faculty also working in university-wide organizational components that provide research infrastructure, and integrating noncore administrative components into the department.

Purpose: To determine the long-term retention of rural family physicians graduating from the Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) of Jefferson Medical College., Method: Of the 1,937 Jefferson graduates from the classes of 1978-1986, the authors identified those practicing rural family medicine when their practice location was first determined. The number and percent of PSAP and non-PSAP graduates practicing family medicine in the same rural area in 2002 were then identified, and compared to the number of those graduates practicing rural family medicine when they were first located in practice 11-16 years earlier., Results: After 11-16 years, 68% (26/38) of the PSAP graduates were still practicing family medicine in the same rural area, compared with 46% (25/54) of their non-PSAP peers (p = .03). Survival analysis showed that PSAP graduates practice family medicine in the same rural locality longer than non-PSAP graduates (p = .04)., Conclusions: These results are the first to show long-term rural primary care retention that is longer than the median duration. This outcome combined with previously published outcomes show that the PSAP represents the only program that has resulted in multifold increases in both recruitment (eight-fold) and long-term retention (at least 11-16 years). In light of recent national recommendations to increase the total enrollment in medical schools, allocating some of this growth to developing and expanding programs similar to the PSAP would make a substantial and long lasting impact on the rural physician workforce.

The Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) project evolved from two prior projects that were aimed at studying the interface between managed care and undergraduate medical education. The project provided funding for 18 US medical schools to demonstrate how they would produce graduates who eventually could practice in a rapidly changing health care environment. Medical schools were required to provide educational opportunities in nine content areas or outline why such educational opportunities could not be provided in their individual projects. Participating schools were chosen via an involved process after careful evaluation by a panel of experienced medical educators. In a project of this type, many lessons are learned. In the UME-21 project, lessons learned were gleaned from progress reports, participant annual reports, proceedings from annual project meetings and a National Symposium, findings of a National Education Group, and published papers. A lesson must have been reported by a least two involved schools to be included. The lessons learned were divided into six categories as follows: content areas, implementation, collaboration, evaluation, governance, implications- summary. Many lessons emanated from each of these categories; however, only the 10 most important lessons in each category are presented. The implications of the lessons learned are outlined and provide direction for the future of medical education innovation and research.

Context: The Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) of Jefferson Medical College (Philadelphia, Pa) is one of a small number of medical school programs that addresses the shortage of rural primary care physicians. However, little is known regarding why these programs work., Objectives: To identify factors independently predictive of rural primary care supply and retention and to determine which components of the PSAP lead to its outcomes., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting and Participants: A total of 3414 Jefferson Medical College graduates from the classes of 1978-1993, including 220 PSAP graduates., Main Outcome Measures: Rural primary care practice and retention in 1999 as predicted by 19 previously collected variables. Twelve variables were available for all classes; 7 variables were collected only for 1978-1982 graduates., Results: Freshman-year plan for family practice, being in the PSAP, having a National Health Service Corps scholarship, male sex, and taking an elective senior family practice rural preceptorship (the only factor not available at entrance to medical school) were independently predictive of physicians practicing rural primary care. For 1978-1982 graduates, growing up in a rural area was the only additionally collected independent predictor of rural primary care (odds ratio [OR], 4.0; 95% CI, 2.1-7.6; P<.001). Participation in the PSAP was the only independent predictive factor of retention for all classes (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.0-11.2; P<.001). Among PSAP graduates, taking a senior rural preceptorship was independently predictive of rural primary care (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7; P =.004). However, non-PSAP graduates with 2 key selection characteristics of PSAP students (having grown up in a rural area and freshman-year plans for family practice) were 78% as likely as PSAP graduates to be rural primary care physicians, and 75% as likely to remain, suggesting that the admissions component of the PSAP is the most important reason for its success. In fact, few graduates without either of these factors were rural primary care physicians (1.8%)., Conclusions: Medical educators and policy makers can have the greatest impact on the supply and retention of rural primary care physicians by developing programs to increase the number of medical school matriculants with background and career plans that make them most likely to pursue these career goals. Curricular experiences and other factors can further increase these outcomes, especially by supporting those already likely to become rural primary care physicians.

In today's continually changing health care environment, there is serious concern that medical students are not being adequately prepared to provide optimal health care in the system where they will eventually practice. To address this problem, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) developed a $7.6 million national demonstration project, Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21). This project funded 18 U.S. medical schools, both public and private, for a three-year period (1998-2001) to implement innovative educational strategies. To accomplish their goals, the 18 UME-21 schools worked with more than 50 organizations external to the medical school (e.g., managed care organizations, integrated health systems, Area Health Education Centers, community health centers). The authors describe the major curricular changes that have been implemented through the UME-21 project, discuss the challenges that occurred in carrying out those changes, and outline the strategies for evaluating the project. The participating schools have developed curricular changes that focus on the core primary care clinical clerkships, take place in ambulatory settings, include learning objectives and competencies identified as important to providing care in the future health care system, and have faculty development and internal evaluation components. Curricular changes implemented at the 18 schools include having students work directly with managed care organizations, as well as special demonstration projects to teach students the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for successfully managing care. It is already clear that the UME-21 project has catalyzed important curricular changes within 12.5% of U.S. medical schools. The ongoing national evaluation of this project, which will be completed in 2002, will provide further information about the project's impact and effectiveness.

Objectives: This study examined the relative and incremental importance of multiple predictors of generalist physicians' care of underserved populations., Methods: Survey results from a 1993 national random sample of 2955 allopathic and osteopathic generalist physicians who graduated from medical school in 1983 or 1984 were analyzed., Results: Four independent predictors of providing care to underserved populations were (1) being a member of an underserved ethnic/minority group, (2) having participated in the National Health Service Corps, (3) having a strong interest in practicing in an underserved area prior to attending medical school, and (4) growing up in an underserved area. Eighty-six percent of physicians with all 4 predictors were providing substantial care to underserved populations, compared with 65% with 3 predictors, 49% with 2 predictors, 34% with 1 predictor, and 22% with no predictors. Sex, family income when growing up, and curricular exposure to underserved populations during medical school were not independently related to caring for the underserved., Conclusions: A small number of factors appear to be highly predictive of generalist physicians' care for the underserved, and most of these predictive factors can be identified at the time of admission to medical school.

Although rural-based graduate medical education is critically important in the training of competent rural family physicians, the number of physicians selecting these programs is highly dependent on what happens earlier in the pipeline, i.e., during medical school. Using the experience and outcomes research from Jefferson Medical College's Physician Short-age Area Program, as well as from published literature describing six other medical school programs with similar goals, this paper addresses the important role of these programs in substantially increasing the number of physicians interested in rural family practice. Although each of these programs differs in its structure, all contain three core features: a strong institutional mission; the targeted selection of students likely to practice in rural areas, predominantly those with rural backgrounds; and a focus on primary care, especially family practice. Outcomes show that all seven programs have been highly successful. Medical schools, therefore, can have a major impact on the number of rural physicians they produce by acting not only as a pipeline or conduit to residency programs, but also as a control valve, beginning as early as the admissions process. In order to maximize their impact on the supply and training of rural family physicians, rural residency programs should understand, support, collaborate with and help develop medical school programs whose mission is to provide rural physicians.

Accurate data on the number of generalist physicians are needed to monitor the physician workforce and to plan for future requirements in the changing health care system. This study assessed the relationship between two frequently used definitions of a generalist physician: completion of graduate medical education (GME) in only a generalist discipline and physician's self-report of practicing as a generalist. Data for 4,808 physician graduates from six Pennsylvania medical schools from 1986 to 1991 were analyzed using information from the GME tracking census of the Association of American Medical Colleges and the Physician Masterfile of the American Medical Association. Of 1,291 physicians trained in a generalist discipline, 1,205 (93%) reported practicing as generalists. Conversely, of the 3,517 not trained in a generalist discipline, 3,358 (95%) were not practicing as generalists. These results indicate GME training is a valid predictor of self-reported practice and provide baseline data to monitor future changes.

Purpose: To evaluate an open-ended, computer-scored testing format designed to overcome certain limitations of multiple-choice questions., Method: Test items covering content in family medicine were administered in two different formats to 7,036 resident physicians in 380 training programs, and to 35 experienced, board-certified physicians in conjunction with the In-training Examination of the American Board of Family Practice. Examinees completed a booklet of 40 open-ended, uncued (UnQ) test items by selecting the answer to each item from a list of over 500 responses. Similar items were administered using the standard multiple-choice question (MCQ) format. One year later, another test of 40 UnQ test items dealing with core content in family medicine was administered to 7,138 residents., Results: Examinees completed over 560,000 UnQ responses with high compliance and few errors. Both reliability and validity for the UnQ format were higher than for the MCQ format, and the UnQ items discriminated more accurately among levels of physicians' experience. The UnQ format almost eliminated the possibility that the physicians could answer questions by sight recognition or random guessing, and it was particularly effective in measuring knowledge of core content., Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility of administering open-ended test items to enhance tests of physicians' competence.

While prior studies have identified a number of factors individually related to physician practice in rural areas, little information is available regarding the relative importance of these factors or their relationship to rural retention. Extensive data previously collected from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study were analyzed for 1972 to 1991 graduates of Jefferson Medical College practicing in Pennsylvania in 1996, as were recent self-reported perceptions of Jefferson Medical College graduates in rural practice. Rural background was overwhelmingly the most important independent predictor of rural practice, and freshman plans to enter family practice was the only other independent predictor. No other variable, including curriculum or debt, added significantly to the likelihood of rural practice. None of these variables, however, including rural background, was predictive of retention, which appeared to be more related to practice issues such as income and workload. These results suggest that increasing the number of physicians who grew up in rural areas is not only the most effective way to increase the number of rural physicians, but any policy that does not include this may be unsuccessful.

Context: The shortage of physicians in rural areas is a longstanding and serious problem, and national and state policymakers and educators continue to face the challenge of finding effective ways to increase the supply of rural physicians., Objective: To determine the direct and long-term impact of the Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) of Jefferson Medical College (JMC) on the rural physician workforce., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Participants and Setting: A total of 206 PSAP graduates from the classes of 1978 to 1991., Main Outcome Measures: The PSAP graduates currently practicing family medicine in rural and underserved areas of Pennsylvania, compared with all allopathic medical school graduates in the state, and with all US and international allopathic graduates. All PSAP graduates were also compared with their non-PSAP peers at JMC regarding their US practice location, medical specialty, and retention for the past 5 to 10 years., Results: The PSAP graduates account for 21% (32/150) of family physicians practicing in rural Pennsylvania who graduated from one of the state's 7 medical schools, even though they represent only 1% (206/14710) of graduates from those schools (relative risk [RR], 19.1). Among all US and international medical school graduates, PSAP graduates represent 12% of all family physicians in rural Pennsylvania. Results were similar for PSAP graduates practicing in underserved areas. Overall, PSAP graduates were much more likely than their non-PSAP classmates at JMC to practice in a rural area of the United States (34% vs 11%; RR, 3.0), to practice in an underserved area (30% vs 9%; RR, 3.2), to practice family medicine (52% vs 13%; RR, 4.0), and to have combined a career in family practice with practice in a rural area (21% vs 2%; RR, 8.5). Of PSAP graduates, 84% were practicing in either a rural or small metropolitan area, or one of the primary care specialties. Program retention has remained high, with the number of PSAP graduates currently practicing rural family medicine equal to 87% of those practicing between 5 and 10 years ago, and the number practicing in underserved areas, 94%., Conclusions: The PSAP, after more than 22 years, has had a disproportionately large impact on the rural physician workforce, and this effect has persisted over time. Based on these program results, policymakers and medical schools can have a substantial impact on the shortage of physicians in rural areas.

Medical education research has identified a number of medical student characteristics that are related to graduates' entering generalist careers. These include initial specialty preference, geographic background, gender, age, ethnicity, economic and lifestyle factors, attitudes and personal values, service orientation, and premedical academic performance. Identifying and giving weight to these factors in the medical school admission process is likely to increase the number of graduates who choose generalist specialties. This paper discusses these medical student characteristics and presents strategies that medical schools could use in the selection process to enhance the matriculation of students who are most likely to become generalists. In this way, medical schools will be able to recruit and select students who are most likely to become excellent physicians, and also produce a more appropriate balance of all specialists to meet the needs of the population.

In 1994 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania announced a statewide Generalist Physician Initiative (GPI) modeled after The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's GPI. Three-year grants totaling more than $9 million were awarded to seven of Pennsylvania's medical schools, including two that had already received GPI grants from the foundation. Stimulated by these initiatives, the state's six allopathic and two osteopathic medical schools decided to work together to develop a collaborative longitudinal tracking system to follow the careers of all their students from matriculation into their professional careers. This statewide data system, which includes information for more than 18,000 students and graduates beginning with the entering class of 1982, can be used to evaluate the impact of the Pennsylvania GPI, and it also yielded a local longitudinal tracking system for each medical school. This paper outlines the concept of the system, its technical implementation, and the corresponding implications for other medical schools considering the development of similar outcomes assessment systems.

Background: Given the high occurrence of oral manifestations in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the relative ease in recognizing these manifestations on physical examination, and their potential impact on the health care and quality of life in these patients, it is critical to provide adequate training for primary care physicians in this area., Methods: Based on a review of the published literature and the consensus of a national panel of primary care physicians and dentists with clinical and research expertise in this area, a core curriculum was developed for primary care physicians regarding oral health care issues in HIV disease., Results and Conclusions: We describe the process of developing the core curriculum of knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding oral health care issues in HIV disease. The final curriculum is in a format that allows for easy accessibility and is organized in a manner that is clinically relevant for primary care physicians.

Recent changes in the health care environment have directed increasing attention to the recognized oversupply of specialists and relative lack of primary care physicians. Despite this imbalance and the need for more primary care physicians, US medical schools are not producing them in adequate numbers. To effect change in the production of primary care physicians, a comprehensive approach that addresses key factors in medical student specialty choice is needed. This article discusses such factors and how they affect medical students during the course of their training. Issues concerning primary care specialty choice and the physician work force are important to the development of the future US health care system.

As the country strives to produce larger numbers of generalist physicians, considerable controversy has arisen over whether or not generalist applicants can be identified, recruited, and influenced to keep a generalist-oriented commitment throughout medical training. The authors present new and existing data to show that: 1) preadmission (BA/MD or post-baccalaureate) programs can help to identify generalist-oriented students; 2) characteristics determined at admission to medical school are predictive of future generalist career choice; 3) current inpatient-oriented training programs strongly push students away from a primary care career; 4) women are more likely than men to choose generalist careers, primarily because of those careers' interpersonal orientation; and 5) residency training programs are able to select applicants likely to become generalists. Therefore, to produce more generalists, attempts should be made to encourage generalist-oriented students to enter medical schools and to revise curricula to focus on outpatient settings in which students can establish effective and satisfying relationships with patients. These strategies are most likely to be successful if enacted within the context of governmental and medical school-based changes that allow for more reimbursement and respect for the generalist disciplines.

Objective: To assess the specialty plans of current fourth-year medical students and, for those not choosing primary care specialties, to investigate the potential effect that changes in key economic or lifestyle factors could have in attracting such students to primary care., Design and Participants: A survey study was sent to 901 fourth-year medical students in the 1993 graduating classes of six US medical schools., Outcome Measures: Comparisons were made between students choosing and not choosing primary care specialties. For the non-primary care students, we also evaluated whether alteration of income, hours worked, or loan repayment could attract them to primary care careers., Results: Of the 688 responses (76% response rate), primary care specialties were chosen by 27% of the students and non-primary care specialties by 73%. One quarter (25%) of the non-primary care students indicated they would change to primary care for one of the following factors: income (10%), hours worked (11%), or loan repayment (4%). For students whose debt was $50,000 or greater, the loan repayment option became much more important than for students with lesser debt. In all, a total of 45% (n = 313) of the students indicated either they were planning to enter primary care (n = 188) or they would change to a primary care specialty (n = 125) with appropriate adjustments in income, hours worked, or loan repayment., Conclusion: Significant changes in economic and lifestyle factors could have a direct effect on the ability to attract students to primary care. Including such changes as part of health system reform, especially within the context of a supportive medical school environment, could enable the United States to approach a goal of graduating 50% generalist physicians.

Background and Methods: To help identify additional information regarding why some individuals are more likely to enter certain medical specialties, we undertook a study to evaluate the relationship between a senior medical student's self-reported alternate career choice (ie, if he or she had not entered medicine), and that student's subsequent choice of a medical specialty., Results: Students entering the specialties of pediatrics, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine were likely to have chosen alternate careers in the teaching, health care, humanities, arts, and nonprofessional areas. In contrast, students entering the specialties of anesthesiology, radiology, internal medicine, and surgery (general surgery or the surgical subspecialties) were more likely to have chosen alternate careers in engineering, research, science, business, law, and architecture., Conclusions: The alternate career choices of medical students may be related to their subsequent choice of medical specialty.

Although the cueing effects inherent in conventional multiple choice questions (MCQs) present serious limitations, this format continues to dominate testing programmes. The present study was undertaken to estimate the effects of cueing when MCQs are used to test medical students, and to evaluate the reliability, validity and feasibility of an alternative testing format. Equivalent items in both MCQ and open-ended, or uncued (Un-Q), formats were administered to 34 third- and fourth-year medical students. The students' mean % correct score on the MCQs was 11 percentage points higher than their mean level of performance on equivalent Un-Qs. When a second set of more difficult items was administered to 16 of these students, their mean performance on the MCQ items was 22 percentage points higher than their performance on equivalent Un-Qs. The results support the feasibility of large group administration of tests constructed in an open-ended format that can be scored by computer. Not only is this format equally reliable and economical when compared with the MCQ, but it also provides important advantages that strengthen its face validity. The Un-Q format can be used to test either simple recall or certain higher level problem-solving skills that cannot be tested by MCQs. Even more important, the results also suggest that the Un-Q format may be a more effective discriminator of academically marginal examinees.

Background: To help address the geographic and specialty maldistribution of physicians, Jefferson Medical College initiated the Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) in 1974. This unique program, which combines a selective medical school admissions policy with a special educational program, has been shown to be successful in increasing the number of family physicians in rural and underserved areas, but it is not known whether they remain in this type of practice., Methods: Graduates of the PSAP were tracked longitudinally and compared with their non-PSAP classmates. Information was obtained about the retention of family physicians in rural areas and areas with a physician shortage over the previous five years, the geographic and specialty choices of more recent graduates, and the recruitment of applicants into the program., Results: Of the 47 PSAP graduates from the classes of 1978 through 1981, reported on earlier, the number who combined a career in family medicine with practice in a rural area or one with a physician shortage remained unchanged, although there was substantial attrition among non-PSAP graduates practicing family medicine in rural (32 percent) and underserved (40 percent) areas. Among the 101 PSAP graduates of the classes of 1982 through 1986, the results were similar to those for the first four classes. Overall, PSAP graduates from the classes of 1978 through 1986 were approximately four times as likely as non-PSAP graduates to practice family medicine (55 percent vs. 13 percent), to practice in a rural area (39 percent vs. 11 percent), and to practice in underserved areas (33 percent vs. 8 percent). They were approximately 10 times more likely to combine a career in family medicine with practice in a rural (26 percent vs. 3 percent) or underserved (23 percent vs. 2 percent) area. Overall, 85 percent of PSAP graduates were either practicing a care specialty or practicing in a rural or small metropolitan area or one with a shortage of physicians. In parallel with national trends, the number of applicants and matriculants to the program decreased during the past decade, so that the percentage of available places filled decreased from 97 percent to 33 percent. However, there has been a recent increase in the number of applicants and matriculants., Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the PSAP was successful in increasing the number of family physicians in rural and underserved areas as well as in retaining them. This suggests that medical schools can have a substantial influence on the distribution of physicians according to specialty choice and the geographic location of their practices, principally through admission criteria.

The recent decline in the number of medical students choosing careers in the primary care specialties has engendered increasing concern that economic factors are becoming more important in influencing the career choices of medical students. In order to assess the relationship of first-year medical students' income expectations to whether they chose to specialize in family practice, the authors analyzed data from 532 graduates of Jefferson Medical College (classes of 1987-1989), using the Jefferson Longitudinal Study. At entrance to medical school, each student listed his or her initial specialty preference and future expected peak income; the determination of actual specialty choice was based on the first year of postgraduate training. Both expected peak incomes and freshman specialty choices were independent predictors of actual specialty choices. The students who entered family practice residencies had lower initial expected peak incomes than did the students entering other specialties, especially the surgery specialties. In addition, according to logistic regression analysis, the students with relatively lower income expectations and a freshman preference for family practice were predicted to be nine times more likely to enter family practice residencies than were students with higher income expectations and no initial family practice preference (56% versus 6%). This study suggests that a freshman's income expectation is an important predictor of family practice specialty choice, independent of age, sex, degree of indebtedness, and initial specialty preference. The authors discuss their results in light of the decline in the number of medical students choosing family practice and the other primary care specialties.

Jefferson Medical College has developed a program to successfully meet the goal of teaching ambulatory care to all medical students, by providing each of its 223 third-year students with a required six-week clerkship in family medicine. The structured clerkship takes place at one of seven residency-based family practice centers, is supplemented by a formal curriculum, and is based on the active clinical involvement of caring for patients under full-time family medicine faculty supervision. This clerkship has been in existence for 16 years, and has added over 400,000 student-patient encounters to the clinical education of over 3,500 students. Student evaluations of the clerkship have rated it the highest of the six required core clerkships at Jefferson. In addition, over 16% of Jefferson graduates have entered family medicine residency training programs, a rate higher than that of any other school in the northeastern United States, and significantly higher than the average for all U.S. medical schools (12%). Jefferson's experience suggests that ambulatory care can be taught as a core component of the clinical education of all medical students. To be successful, however, strong institutional support, a structured curriculum, an adequate number of patients, a dedicated faculty, a sufficient number of training sites, an appropriate evaluation process, and significant financial support are all necessary.

Upper respiratory tract infections are among the most common acute infections in humans. This review discusses the clinically important aspects of the epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, complications, and prevention of the common cold, pharyngitis, otitis media, and sinusitis. Most episodes of the common cold and pharyngitis are of viral origin, and curative therapy is not available. Streptococcal pharyngitis, acute otitis media, and sinusitis are secondary to bacterial infections, and antibiotic therapy is important.

Over one third of U.S. medical school matriculants from the graduating class of 1983 had an original career interest in family practice, although there was a significant attrition by the time of medical school graduation. Perhaps of greater importance, however, was that students who entered medical school with an interest in family practice were almost three times as likely to choose family practice as a career than matriculants who were interested in other specialties (24.2% versus 8.4%, P less than .001).