Bhatt AS, Varshney AS, Moscone A, Claggett BL, Miao ZM, Chatur S, Lopes MS, Ostrominski JW, Pabon MA, Unlu O, Wang X, Bernier TD, Buckley LF, Cook B, Eaton R, Fiene J, Kanaan D, Kelly J, Knowles DM, Lupi K, Matta LS, Pimentel LY, Rhoten MN, Malloy R, Ting C, Chhor R, Guerin JR, Schissel SL, Hoa B, Lio CH, Milewski K, Espinosa ME, Liu Z, McHatton R, Cunningham JW, Jering KS, Bertot JH, Kaur G, Ahmad A, Akash M, Davoudi F, Hinrichsen MZ, Rabin DL, Gordan PL, Roberts DJ, Urma D, McElrath EE, Hinchey ED, Choudhry NK, Nekoui M, Solomon SD, Adler DS, and Vaduganathan M
Background: Scalable and safe approaches for heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization are needed., Objectives: The authors assessed the safety and effectiveness of a virtual care team guided strategy on GDMT optimization in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Methods: In a multicenter implementation trial, we allocated 252 hospital encounters in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% to a virtual care team guided strategy (107 encounters among 83 patients) or usual care (145 encounters among 115 patients) across 3 centers in an integrated health system. In the virtual care team group, clinicians received up to 1 daily GDMT optimization suggestion from a physician-pharmacist team. The primary effectiveness outcome was in-hospital change in GDMT optimization score (+2 initiations, +1 dose up-titrations, -1 dose down-titrations, -2 discontinuations summed across classes). In-hospital safety outcomes were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee., Results: Among 252 encounters, the mean age was 69 ± 14 years, 85 (34%) were women, 35 (14%) were Black, and 43 (17%) were Hispanic. The virtual care team strategy significantly improved GDMT optimization scores vs usual care (adjusted difference: +1.2; 95% CI: 0.7-1.8; P < 0.001). New initiations (44% vs 23%; absolute difference: +21%; P = 0.001) and net intensifications (44% vs 24%; absolute difference: +20%; P = 0.002) during hospitalization were higher in the virtual care team group, translating to a number needed to intervene of 5 encounters. Overall, 23 (21%) in the virtual care team group and 40 (28%) in usual care experienced 1 or more adverse events (P = 0.30). Acute kidney injury, bradycardia, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and hospital length of stay were similar between groups., Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with HFrEF, a virtual care team guided strategy for GDMT optimization was safe and improved GDMT across multiple hospitals in an integrated health system. Virtual teams represent a centralized and scalable approach to optimize GDMT., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Funding was provided by the Brigham Health Care Redesign Incubator and Startup Program, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr Varshney has received consulting fees from Broadview Ventures. Dr Claggett has received consulting fees from Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Intellia, and Novartis. Dr Eaton is employed at Brigham and Women’s hospital, but is also employed by Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Dr Cunningham has received consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics and Occlutech. Dr Choudhry has received research grant support to Brigham and Women‘s Hospital from Merck, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, CVS Health, and Medisafe. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Neurotronik, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, and Sarepta. Dr Vaduganathan has received research grant support from, served on advisory boards for, or had speaker engagements with American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Baxter Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cytokinetics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Relypsa, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Tricog Health; and participates on clinical trial committees for studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Galmed, Novartis, Bayer, Occlutech, and Impulse Dynamics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)