Search

Surfers both cooperate and compete around a scarce natural resource – ocean waves suited for surfing – often with a fraught mix of motives and feelings, pro-social and anti-social. Much as surfers constantly adapt to a dynamic wave environment, their pro- and anti-social motives readily mix and shift, based on their interpretation of quickly changing context. What we learn from surfers is something materialistic focus on self-interest and realities of scarcity or abundance might de-emphasize or miss: a culture of interpretation and reasoning (e.g. 'localism') is as important in the formation of shifting pro- and anti-social attitudes as the material reality of wave scarcity or abundance itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this article is to (re)assert the importance of an organizational lens in the socio-cultural study of sport. Specifically, we aim to demonstrate the often self-perpetuating and always value-infused nature of rational design, and the organizational processes through which problems, objectives, structures, roles, identities, and knowledges are (re)constituted and privileged in the context of sport. Drawing on an institutional understanding of organizational life, we examine Swedish sports' adoption of a new integrity platform as a case of rational design. Analyzing documentary and interview data, we demonstrate how positing organization as the object of knowledge allows us to unpack how, why, and with what effects, social issues and domains become subsumed into processes of rationalization and rational organizational design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research explored the strategic beliefs that people have about science and the extent to which it can explain moral and immoral behaviors. Although people do not believe that science is able to explain certain aspects of their mind, they might nevertheless accept a scientific explanation for their immoral behaviors if that explanation is exculpatory. In a first study, participants reflected on moral and immoral deeds that they performed or that other people performed. Participants were somewhat skeptic that science can account for people's behavior— except for when they reflected on the wrongdoings that they committed. Two further studies suggest that strategic belief in science arises because it enables external attributions for the behavior, outside of the wrongdoers' control. Implications are discussed for science understanding and communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the dark side of the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace, with a focus on understanding the risks, and underlying factors driving fraud in the NFT ecosystem. Using the fraud triangle framework, this study examines pressure, opportunity, and rationalization from individual and organizational perspectives. The research provides a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors to NFT marketplace fraud by analyzing the reasons behind fraudulent actions. A conceptual framework is developed that includes ten propositions to aid in understanding the complexity of this issue. This study’s outcomes will assist policymakers in crafting efficient approaches to mitigate fraud within the NFT marketplace. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article "Max Weber and the Re-Enchantment of Charisma" delves into Max Weber's critique of rationalization in Western society and his focus on charisma as a significant quality. It explores how charisma is studied in power and politics, particularly in European and global settings, and discusses Weber's engagement with Chinese philosophy. The text also examines historical forms of ruling, including charismatic and traditionalist authority, and the transition to modern bureaucratic structures. Weber's analysis of charisma in various cultural contexts, such as Confucian China, provides valuable insights into transcultural interactions and historical concepts. [Extracted from the article]

Machine vision is one the most consequential applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in contemporary society. This article analyzes how companies that produce machine vision technology articulate what it means for machines to "see." Through a thematic analysis of more than 200 corporately produced documents, we examine the companies' product offerings and identify three discursive techniques that entwine basic explanations of emerging technology with the ideologies of AI producers: dismantling sight into technical action, expanding the parameters of sight, and seeing through data. These recurring corporate narratives organize perceptions of automation, educating outsiders how to value computational outcomes and support them through rearranging the real-world conditions of labor. We argue that the social power of machine vision is not only in how it detects objects, but also in how it arbitrates what work is visible in visions of the industry's future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since Donald Davidson issued his challenge to anticausalism in 1963, most philosophers have espoused the view that our actions are causally explained by the reasons why we do them. This Davidsonian consensus, however, rests on a faulty argument. Davidson’s challenge has been met, in more than one way, by anticausalists such as C. Ginet, G. Wilson, and S. Sehon. Hence I endeavor to support causalism with a stronger argument. Our actions are correlated with our motivating reasons; to wit, we often do what we have reason to do. In yet other words, we are often rational. Our frequent rationality is easily explained if causalism is correct, but looks like a staggering coincidence otherwise. Anticausalism thus appears to be ill-equipped to account for the very existence of rational behavior, and so far no attempts in this direction have succeeded. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we first frame the use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the public sector as a continuation and intensification of long-standing rationalization and bureaucratization processes. Drawing on Weber, we understand the core of these processes to be the replacement of traditions with instrumental rationality, that is, the most calculable and efficient way of achieving any given policy objective. Second, we demonstrate how much of the criticisms, both among the public and in scholarship, directed towards AI systems spring from well-known tensions at the heart of Weberian rationalization. To illustrate this point, we introduce a thought experiment whereby AI systems are used to optimize tax policy to advance a specific normative end: reducing economic inequality. Our analysis shows that building a machine-like tax system that promotes social and economic equality is possible. However, our analysis also highlights that AI-driven policy optimization (i) comes at the exclusion of other competing political values, (ii) overrides citizens' sense of their (non-instrumental) obligations to each other, and (iii) undermines the notion of humans as self-determining beings. Third, we observe that contemporary scholarship and advocacy directed towards ensuring that AI systems are legal, ethical, and safe build on and reinforce central assumptions that underpin the process of rationalization, including the modern idea that science can sweep away oppressive systems and replace them with a rule of reason that would rescue humans from moral injustices. That is overly optimistic: science can only provide the means – it cannot dictate the ends. Nonetheless, the use of AI in the public sector can also benefit the institutions and processes of liberal democracies. Most importantly, AI-driven policy optimization demands that normative ends are made explicit and formalized, thereby subjecting them to public scrutiny, deliberation, and debate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While therapy culture has long been a part of the repertoires through which people think about and practice their romantic relationships, it has been less prominent in how they envision friendship. However, based on our interviews on experiences of friendlessness in an Atlantic Canadian city, we show that therapeutic styles increasingly shape how people orient to friendship, even as friends rarely seek formal therapy to manage their conflicts. This article focuses on how modern therapy culture, with its emphasis on individual wellbeing, self-knowledge, and 'healthy' rather than 'toxic' relationships, presents people with conflicting cultural imperatives for how to practice their friendships. On the one hand, therapy culture encourages people to seek out friends to whom they can disclose their most intimate feelings and experiences – friends who will offer support, understanding, and validation. On the other hand, therapy culture equally cautions that one must maintain 'boundaries' to protect oneself from friends' personal revelations or 'traumas.' We ask what these dual imperatives mean for modern friendship and how people experience the tension between them. We argue that one reason modern friendship can be difficult is that divulging one's intimate feelings or experiences to a friend can be interpreted as either building intimacy or burdening others with one's problems, or crucially, both at the same time. Our findings lead us to ask how therapy culture might increasingly turn friendship into a reflexive object or something else to 'optimize' rather than providing an escape from relationships that demand 'work.' [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract This study investigates the dark side of the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace, with a focus on understanding the risks, and underlying factors driving fraud in the NFT ecosystem. Using the fraud triangle framework, this study examines pressure, opportunity, and rationalization from individual and organizational perspectives. The research provides a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors to NFT marketplace fraud by analyzing the reasons behind fraudulent actions. A conceptual framework is developed that includes ten propositions to aid in understanding the complexity of this issue. This study’s outcomes will assist policymakers in crafting efficient approaches to mitigate fraud within the NFT marketplace.

This study identifies the discursive strategies used by Shamsie in portraying two male characters as victims of oppression. I identified the recurrently occurring process types like mental and modal verbs, as well as rationalization, distillation, and over-determination. Two male characters from two novels by Pakistani Anglophone novelist Kamila Shamsie are chosen. Van Leeuwen's discourse-analytical categories (2008) are identified with the help of corpus tools. The study investigates how language constructs victimized characters to evoke sympathy in the reader. The use of Word Sketch to investigate the language of literature is also demonstrated in this research. The current research not only explores the discursive techniques but also proposes the corpus methodology which is used to identify these techniques. The study suggests further exploration into the phenomenon to understand whether the identified discursive techniques used for portraying victim characters are unique to Pakistani anglophone literature or it is used by English fiction writers in general. This research opens new avenues for future studies to understand the language of victimhood in larger corpora.

This research was conducted to determine the implications of audit competency, red flags, and professional skepticism on fraud detection. Red flags (danger signs) in this research use perceptions in the categories Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization. The population in this study were KAP auditors in South Jakarta using the convenience sampling method. In this research, the data source used is primary data using the data collection method, namely the questionnaire technique. The data analysis technique used is quantitative descriptive analysis. This research uses independent variables of perception in the categories Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, and also a moderating variable, namely Professional Skepticism. Meanwhile, the dependent variable is fraud detection. This research shows that the independent variables Pressure, Opportunity and Skepticism play a role in detecting fraud. Meanwhile, audit competency and Rationalization do not play a role in detecting fraud in the company. Another result of this research is that professional skepticism can strengthen or weaken audit competence, red flags in the Pressure and Rationalization categories for fraud detection. However, it cannot strengthen or weaken perceptions in the Opportunity category regarding company fraud detection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main scope of this study is to use plyometric means in volleyball training, individualized according to the training period, in order to improve the strength-speed capacity from the point of multidimensional perspective. The longitudinal experiment took place during the competitive year 2022-2023 and consisted in the introduction of plyometric means in training, depending on the training period, the time allocated to the improvement of strength-speed capacity being 20 minutes. We mention that the research was carried out in the gym of Dacia Pitesti Technological High School. The statistical data were collected by using the "Kistler Force Measurement Platform - Quattro Jump v1.1.1.x". According to the results, we mention that through the use of specialized plyometric programs during training, we obtained significantly improved values in the final evaluation of the applied tests, through a significant percentage increase with a value between 7% and 25% in the group subjected to the experiment. Sports training for U17 female volleyball players is a systematic and continuous pedagogical process with the objective of improving the general motor capacity and in particular the strength-speed capacity, the functional and mental capacity, based on the adaptation of the body to the intense and maximum efforts. In conclusion, the use of specialized plyometric programs in the training of cadet female volleyball players (15-17 years), determines a faster and more extensive development of general physical training, ensures a good rest for the athletes and reveals a more efficient use of the time allocated to the training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As more women enter politics, public and scholarly narratives about the extent and nature of gender bias in mediated campaigning environments diversify. Yet there is still little understanding of how voters substantively think about gender in their evaluations of women and men candidates and how voters' thoughts are affected by different types of media coverage. Drawing on literature on gender stereotyping and rationalization, this paper distinguishes two roles in which gender manifests in the candidate evaluation process—as a heuristic and as a rationalization. We empirically investigate these different ways in which gender affects voters' thoughts following neutral and contextually rich candidate stimuli by means of a mixed methods think aloud study. The results show that voters think less—but more positively—about substantive aspects of women's political profiles. These favorable thoughts include heuristic inferences of communal traits for women but not men candidates. Moreover, we find that voter rationalizations involve gender as ex post vote justifications and socially desirable drivers of candidate evaluations. Together, the findings not only showcase the complex roles of gender in voters' candidate evaluations but also the importance of considering the normative context in which vote decisions take place. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hidrological analysis is an important thing to do to support reservoir management activities. Hydrological data is needed as input in carrying out hydrological analysis. Quality of hudrological data is very dependent on the condition of the rainfall station network (number and location of rainfall stations). Therefore, a study is needed to review the rainfall station network in the Wonogiri Reservoir Water Catchment Area. The aim of this research is to obtain an effective and efficient rainfall station network in the catchment area to support Wonogiri Reservoir operational activities. This research uses the Kagan method for rationalization analysis of rainfall stations. Based on the analysi of the Kagan method in the Wonogiri Reservoir catchment area with an interpolation error of 5%, it produces eight recommended rainfall stations consisting of five existing rainfall stations and three new rainfall stations with a Kagan triangle length of 14.28 km. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, I make the case that the reception of Foucault's politicpal thought by different authors linked to the Frankfurt School tradition (J. Habermas, N. Fraser, A. Honneth, A. Allen and M. Saar) allows us to discern a series of transformations within the tradition itself. In general terms, it is argued that the fundamental change concerns the gradual abandonment of the problem of social rationalization in favor of a perspective focused on the question of processes of subjectivation, a change that calls into question the very meaning of the tradition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to find evidence of the effect of the fraud triangle model, pressure, opportunity and rationalization on fraudulent financial reporting. This research will also test whether the audit committee can strengthen or weaken the effect of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization on fraudulent financial statements. The data used is the data listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange. The companies used as a sample are a total of 17 companies listed on the SriKehati Stock Index from 2017 to 2021. The total sample for this study includes 85 financial reports .We use panel data regression to test the hypotheses of this study. Fraudulent trading has a significant negative impact on financial objectives (ROA). Between in effective oversight (BDOUT) and rationalization (TATA), there is a positive and significant impact on fraudulent transactions . The examination board does not affect the degree of cheating. The Audit Committee has been unable to strengthen the impact of financial targets on fraudulent accounts. Audit committees could amplify the impact of ineffective oversight of fraudulent accounts. Audit committees can mitigate the impact of rationalization on fraudulent accounts. To avoid fraudulent financial reporting by companies, audit committees must perform their duties properly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the effect of ethical ideology on fraud rationalization among future accountants in Nigeria. Specifically, it investigates whether being a moral idealist or moral relativist influences the ability of future accountants to rationalize fraud. The study collected data from 225 participants with a scenario-based questionnaire, which was analysed using independent sample t-tests and regression estimation techniques. The results reveal a direct correlation between ethical ideology and fraud rationalization, indicating that future accountants who are high in moral relativism and low in moral idealism have higher tendencies to rationalize fraud than those who are high in moral idealism and low in moral relativism. These findings emphasize the importance of ethical ideology as an intrinsic psychological mechanism that can predict fraud rationalization tendencies in individuals. The study highlights the important implications of its findings and provides suggestions for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article describes the diet catering service (delivering ready-made meals to customers’ homes or work in a selected period) as an example of rationalization and professionalization of diet. The article is based on the results of interviews conducted with 15 users of dietetic catering from Poland, conducted between 2021 and 2023. The aim of the interviews was to try to answer the question of what benefits the respondents derived from using dietetic catering in their everyday life. As the results of the analysis show, respondents try to live a healthy lifestyle, which they do not always succeed in doing. Outsourcing the preparation of meals to the specialized companies allows them to save time and receive well-balanced meals, at selected times of the day adapted to their rhythm of work. There is a compromise between meeting healthy eating norms and social norms relating to food consumption, both in terms of mealtimes, the number of meals per day as well as what is meant by a ‘proper lunch’.

The aim of this research was to examine the impact of Pressure, Capability, Opportunity, Collusion, Rationalization, and Arrogance on Financial Report Fraud, with the Audit Committee serving as a moderating variable. The study utilized library research and documentation techniques for data collection, focusing on a sample of 54 real estate sector companies listed on the IDX from 2020 to 2022. Regression Analysis was employed to analyze the data, which was secondary in nature. The findings reveal the significant influence of Pressure, Opportunity, and Collusion on Financial Report Fraud, while Capability, Rationalization, and Arrogance did not exhibit a significant effect. Additionally, the Audit Committee as a moderating variable did not significantly impact the relationships between the Fraud Hexagon factors and Financial Report Fraud. These results offer new insights into the role of the Audit Committee in fraud prevention and the application of the Fraud Hexagon model in detecting financial report fraud. The study suggests further research to explore the interactions between these factors and the effectiveness of audit committees in mitigating fraud. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article investigates the use of wolves to enchant the rationalization of Thompson Manitoba. The city attempted to refocus towards a more touristic economy based around the large wolf population in the surrounding regions. The paper also examines why this attempt at a tourist economy has not produced its intended results. I accomplish this by first discussing the McDonaldization and enchantment of the city. This discussion is framed through George Ritzer and Jeffery C. Alexander's work. I then integrate Umwelt analysis by focusing on Timo Maran's Umwelt mapping to create a comparative approach in which wolf Umwelts within rationalized and enchanted settings can be compared to those in situ. I then make use of qualitative data analysis (QDA) to code a corpus of 50 articles from a local online newspaper that discuss the development of the tourism economy. Accordingly, I apply the theoretical perspectives mentioned to the QDA codes and themes. In the discussion section and conclusion of this paper, I note that wolf Umwelt was largely incompatible with the rationalizing system created within the city and that the use of wolves as enchantment relied on motifs of overly hyperreal intersubjectivity between humans and wolves. Consequently, collective representation regarding the tourist initiative was not constructed by this rationalization and enchantment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Architecture & Life Journal / Kocaeli Üniversitesi Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi is the property of Architecture & Life Journal / Kocaeli Universitesi Mimarllik ve Yasam Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The Fraud Diamond theory (rationalization, opportunity, motivation and perceived capability) has been widely used as a framework to explain criminal behavior. However, little is known about its application in an academic context. Research on the relationship between the prevalence of academic fraud (e.g., cheating on exams, plagiarizing essays) and students' perceptions of the severity of such behaviors is also lacking. We surveyed 1,032 university students and asked them whether they engaged in fraudulent behaviors and how severe they thought these behaviors were. The results showed that motivation, rationalization, and perceived capability dimensions of the Fraud Diamond theory are important factors in predicting the prevalence of students' academic fraudulent behavior, but not opportunity. We also found that the more students reported that they engaged in fraudulent academic behaviors, the less severe they perceived those behaviors to be. However, only rationalization emerged as a predictor of perceived severity. The results suggest that the more students are able to find justifications for their fraudulent behavior, the less severe they perceive those behaviors to be. Rationalization seems to explain, therefore, the tendency to disassociate moral values from dishonest behavior. Taken together, the study shows a vicious cycle between engaging in fraudulent academic behavior and the ability to justify these acts. Implications for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are discussed. Plain language summary: Understanding students' academic cheating using the fraud diamond theory Purpose: To examine whether the Fraud Diamond theory explains fraudulent academic behavior (e.g., cheating on exams, plagiarizing essays). More specifically, to determine the relationship between the prevalence of academic fraud and students' perceptions of the severity and whether the ability to justify fraudulent academic behavior is related to the students' perception of its severity. Methods: A survey was administered to 1,032 university students who agreed to participate in the study. Hypotheses were tested using correlational and predictive statistical techniques. Conclusions: The Fraud Diamond theory can be used to explain the prevalence of students' fraudulent academic behavior. The severity of such behavior is explained by the students' ability to justify their fraudulent actions. The more the students cheat, the less severe they find this behavior to be, suggesting that students feel that cheating occasionally is not a big deal. Implications: Promoting a culture of integrity is more than just the implementation of control mechanisms of face-to-face and virtual invigilation. Programs of academic integrity including institutional, group, and individual level approaches are needed to create a sense of moral identity and self-control mechanisms which will reduce the propensity to cheat. Limitations: The data for this study is drawn from the students subjective self-reported experiences of their fraudulent behavior and may not accurately reflect objective prevalence of fraudulent behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Traffic climate affect safety driving. • Psychological factors play mediating roles. In the research field of safe driving behavior, the emergence of prosocial driving research complements the more traditional dangerous driving research. In recent years, studies on the relationship between the urban traffic climate and prosocial driving have even been taken as a new direction for further improving urban traffic safety based on the construction of traffic safety facilities and the development of traffic safety regulations. The mechanism by which urban traffic climate affects prosocial driving is explored in this study. From a dual research perspective, i.e., a variable-centered and person-centered perspective, a theoretical model of prosocial driving is constructed based on the following three levels: environmental, psychological and behavioral. According to the results, First, rational, affective and moral factors at the individual psychological level play mediating roles between urban traffic climate at the environmental level and prosocial driving behavior at the behavioral level. As indicated by the results of a mediating pathway analysis, rational, affective and moral factors are intricately linked by five complex mediating paths at the psychological level. Second, there is a differentiated environmental-psychological activation mechanism between individuals' prosocial driving and aggressive driving. Third, urban traffic climate consists of a variety of typical safety climate types, and individuals have diverse psychological tendencies regarding safe driving in traffic climates of varying safety levels. The study concludes with a systematic discussion of its theoretical contributions and practical value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Urban passenger transport faces significant challenges, including congestion, safety concerns, and environmental impacts. Smart Transportation Systems (STS) offer a promising strategy to address these issues by leveraging technology for data-driven decision-making, improved efficiency, and enhanced user experience. This paper explores the potential of STS for rationalizing and governing urban passenger transport, using Japan as a model country. By examining Japan's experience with STS implementation, the paper analyzes the economic benefits, technological advancements, and governance frameworks that contribute to its success. The paper concludes by highlighting key lessons learned from Japan that can be applied by other countries seeking to improve their urban passenger transport systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Can inefficiency be rational? Excess resources or slack may serve as a buffer against environmental shocks, help decouple organizations, ease planning and implementation, support innovation, and enable effective responses to competitors. Slack may however also be the result of inefficiency. In Bogetoft and Kerstens, Distinguishing useful and wasteful slack, we propose an approach to separate useful and wasteful slack. If an organization can maintain the same levels of output and slack at lower cost, there is wasteful or nonrationalizable spending. We develop ways to measure the extent to which total spending can be rationalized and show how to statistically estimate and test the usefulness of the available slack using bootstrapping. The literature on organization and strategic management suggests that slack in the form of excess resources may be useful. It may, for example, serve as a buffer against environmental shocks, help decouple organizations, ease planning and implementation, support innovation, and enable effective responses to competitors. In contrast, the economic literature tends to view slack as wasteful. When the same products and services can be produced with fewer resources and slack per se is not assigned any value, slack should be eliminated. The aim of this paper is to reconcile these two perspectives. We acknowledge that slack may be both useful and wasteful. The challenge is how to separate the two. Our approach relies on the simple Pareto idea. If an organization can maintain the same levels of output and slack at lower cost, there is wasteful or nonrationalizable spending. We develop ways to measure the extent to which total spending can be rationalized and show how to statistically estimate and test the usefulness of the available slack using bootstrapping. Funding: Financial support from Det Frie Forskningsråd [Grant 9038-00042A] is greatly appreciated. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2415. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The idea of confining the idea of 'rationality' with that of the 'choice of best elements' unnecessarily limits the sense and scope of 'rationality'. The existing internal consistency conditions that are popularly used in the social choice theory to assess a choice function are insufficient to analyse several choice patterns. The paper tries to address that problem by accepting a broader definition of rationality and characterizes choice behaviours where an individual chooses a k-th best element from set of alternatives, where k is an integer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article I develop sociologist George Ritzer’s concept ‘simulated animal’ by focusing on rational systems, enchantment, and nonhuman animal corporeality and behaviour. I argue that simulated animals are nonhumans controlled, structured, or represented within consumer contexts. From this I develop what I am calling ‘simulated umwelt’. Simulated umwelt, as a concept, is a synthesis of zoosemiotics with Ritzer’s work and focuses on nonhuman animals’ experiences and representations within rationalized settings and consumer representation. This is accomplished by applying umwelt theory and analysis to the subjective experiential aspect of simulated animals via umwelt construction, in the ongoing pursuit of descriptive and critical approaches to nonhuman animals closely connected to consumption. I conclude by emphasizing the utility of simulated umwelt reconstruction for facilitating “truly” intersubjective descriptions of nonhuman experience.

The article considers the complication of social and cultural traumas under the global-local complexity and the transition to the dominance of nonlinear development. One of the types of the contemporary complex traumas is the ‘normal trauma’ that manifests itself as ‘naturally’ occurring fluctuations, bifurcations, gaps, paradoxes and metamorphoses. The consequences of ‘normal traumas’ for the formation of human capital are ambivalent: on the one hand, they deform the existing values and norms, previously acquired important competences and skills, thereby, knowledge becomes unclaimed; on the other hand, they encourage the creation of new qualities of human capital, necessary for adaptation to complex, nonlinearly developing realities. The author focuses on the ‘normal traumas’ of human capital, which are caused by the processes of globalization, rationalization, digitalization and the post-covid-19 consequences. The author argues that ‘normal traumas’ can and should be managed to minimize and overcome their dysfunctional, dehumanizing effects in order to develop new creative and humane components of human capital. To achieve this goal, the author suggests applying the theoretical-methodological instruments of the humanistic digital turn, ‘rediscovery’ of the significance of substantive rationalities and national-local lifeworlds, and introduction of innovative approaches to the formation of human capital under the effects of global-local complexity and nonlinearity. The author makes a conclusion about the need for the national strategy for the formation of human capital and national-cultural answers to ‘normal traumas’, based on the features of the Russian culture.

Copyright of Larq Journal for Philosophy, Linguistics & Social Sciences is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Graph rationales are representative subgraph structures that best explain and support the graph neural network (GNN) predictions. Graph rationalization involves the joint identification of these subgraphs during GNN training, resulting in improved interpretability and generalization. GNN is widely used for node-level tasks such as paper classification and graph-level tasks such as molecular property prediction. However, on both levels, little attention has been given to GNN rationalization and the lack of training examples makes it difficult to identify the optimal graph rationales. In this work, we address the problem by proposing a unified data augmentation framework with two novel operations on environment subgraphs to rationalize GNN prediction. We define the environment subgraph as the remaining subgraph after rationale identification and separation. The framework efficiently performs rationale–environment separation in the representation space for a node's neighborhood graph or a graph's complete structure to avoid the high complexity of explicit graph decoding and encoding. We conduct experiments on 17 datasets spanning node classification, graph classification, and graph regression. Results demonstrate that our framework is effective and efficient in rationalizing and enhancing GNNs for different levels of tasks on graphs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The notion of the mechanism is one of the most popular and widely used concepts in science and sociology is no exception. This paper problematizes the widespread and often uncritical use of the term "mechanism" in contemporary sociology. Drawing on the mechanistic worldview associated with leading figures of the scientific revolution, the paper emphasizes the impact of mechanistic thinking on the societal rationalization process identified by Max Weber and the Frankfurt School. The analysis suggests that mechanisms, when applied to sociological theories, may uncritically reproduce a cultural fetish of the rational society with potentially dehumanizing consequences. The author advocates for a critical reflection on the cultural and historical context of mechanisms, urging sociologists to view them not merely as analytical tools but as active contributors to the creation and shaping of social worlds erected on a belief in instrumental reason. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies have used theoretical general equilibrium or empirical computable general equilibrium models to analyze the economic and welfare effects of fishery rationalization, adopting a simplistic assumption regarding factor mobility. This study relaxes the simplistic assumption and considers more possibilities of mobility when assessing the effects of rationalization using a computable general equilibrium model for the Gulf of Alaska groundfish trawl fishery. Results demonstrate that the effects of rationalization vary significantly across different factor mobility assumptions, suggesting that the effects computed based on the simplistic assumption could mislead fishery managers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Against claims that cognitive science of religion undercuts belief in God, many defenders of theistic belief have invoked the Religious Reasons Reply: science cannot undercut belief in God if one has good independent reasons to believe. However, it is unclear whether this response helps salvage the god beliefs of most people. This paper considers four questions: (1) What reasons do Christians have for believing in God? (2) What kinds of beliefs about God can the reasons support? (3) Are the reasons rationalizations? (4) Can cognitive science undercut the reasons? Many Christians invoke everyday religious experiences (EREs)—such as experiences of divine presence, guidance, and communication—as reasons to believe. Unlike another popular reason to believe in God (the appearance of design and beauty in nature), EREs can support beliefs about a relational God who is present to me, who guides my life, and who speaks to me. EREs are not rationalizations since they seem to cause and sustain such beliefs. Nonetheless, EREs like experiences of hearing God speak are problematic reasons to believe. 'Soft' voice-hearing experiences are easily undercut. 'Hard' experiences of an external, audible voice are probably underpinned by similar cognitive processes as audio-verbal hallucinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Technikgeschichte is the property of Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)