Search

The Covid-19 pandemic has an impact on the banking sector which affects financial performance, because financing is not running smoothly due to debtor arrears due to many people losing their jobs and having difficulty paying financing. The research aims to determine the differences in the financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks during the Covid-19 pandemic. This research also uses qualitative research with comparative descriptive objectives. The sample in this study consists of Shariah and conventional banks registered with the Financial Services Authority in 2020, totaling 62 banks, comprising 12 Shariah banks and 50 conventional banks. The analysis technique used is a difference test through independent sample t-test. The research results indicate that there is no difference in the financial performance of both Islamic and conventional banks. Financial performance, as assessed by CAR, NPL/NPF, and FDR/LDR ratios, still falls within the safe category, where banks can meet capital needs, maintain asset quality, and ensure bank liquidity during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, both Shariah and conventional banks have not been able to meet the BOPO and ROA ratio limits due to a decrease in bank income during the Covid-19 pandemic.

This study aims to analyze the effect of the attribute framing and justification on decision making through the capital budgeting process. This study also aims to examine the effect of justification as moderation on the effect of attribute framing on capital budgeting decisions. The capital budgeting decision in this study is a decision toward the proposed capital budgeting project in the form of approving or rejecting the proposed project. This study uses a quasi-experimental research design with the data taken is primary data. The quasi-experimental research was designed 2 x 2 between subjects which was conducted to 83 financial students in the Magister of Management, Diponegoro University. Data analysis techniques used in this study were one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA.The results of the study shows that attribute framing and justification can influence decision making through the capital budgeting process. In particular, the information that is positively presented has an impact in the higher approval of a proposed capital budgeting project. This research also concluded that justification could not reduce the effect of the attribute framing on capital budgeting decisions. This shows that belief revision theory- foundation approach cannot explain the phenomenon of this study.