Search

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique for en bloc resection of neoplastic lesions of the digestive tract. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was developed in Asia. and data from Western countries are scarce. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ESD for resection of superficial premalignant and malignant epithelial neoplasms in a tertiary center in Italy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with gastrointestinal lesions who underwent ESD between January 2013 and December 2018 in our center were retrospectively evaluated. Technical success, en bloc, R0, curative resection, and complication rates were assessed.RESULTS: A total of 107 lesions (stomach, no.=41: rectum, no.=32; colon. no.=28: esophagus, no.=5; duodenum, no.=1) were resected by ESD in 93 patients. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was technically successful in 99.1% (106/107) of lesions. Among the 90 superficial premalignant and malignant epithelial neoplasms, en bloc, and R0 resection rates were 97.8% (no.=88) and 75.6% (no.=68), respectively. Major complications occurred in 9.3% (10/107) of cases: 4 (3.7%) were perforations and 6 (5.6%) were major bleedings. All complications, but two which needed surgery, were managed endoscopically.CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that ESD is a feasible, effective, and safe technique in a Western country.

We read with interest the recent paper comparing 1 and 2 weeks of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. ( Gut 2007; 56 :475–9) H pylori is an infectious disease and the goal of treatment is to cure the infection. In 2007, one would hope to be able to reliably cure ⩾95% of the treated patients (discussed by Graham et al ).1 In 1989, a successful treatment has been defined as one that cures >80% of the patients.2 By 1995, it seemed that 90% was achievable.3 The Maastricht consensus conferences defined a useful therapy as the one with an intention to treat (ITT) cure rate of >80%, which is a relatively low hurdle (ie, those with cure rates of ⩽80% would be unacceptable).5 Although the authors concluded that 7 and 14 days therapy provided essentially equivalent results, the focus should have been on the fact that the cure rates obtained were unacceptably low with either duration (eg, ITT of 79.7 for 7 days and 81.7 for 14 days), especially among patients with duodenal ulcer disease where the cure rates are typically higher than among patients without ulcers.5–8 Their results are not unexpected as large studies of this legacy triple therapy (proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin) have recently yielded unacceptably low eradication rates in Europe and the US, and have only infrequently achieved the minimum 80% success rate (table 1).10–17 Overall, these results suggest that traditional triple therapy should no longer be used in Western populations unless pretreatment susceptibility is …

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is recognized as one of the most significant risk factors for gastric cancer, and H. pylori eradication has been proposed as a possible primary chemo-preventive strategy to reduce gastric cancer incidence. AIM: To evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy of H. pylori eradication in the prevention of gastric cancer. METHODS: Epidemiological, observational and interventional studies, as well as decisional models, were taken into account in this review. RESULTS: Large-scale epidemiological studies clearly link H. pylori infection with non-cardia gastric cancer. Current evidence suggests that, in a subpopulation of treated subjects, H. pylori eradication prevents the progression of preneoplastic lesions. Studies that have attempted to evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication on the incidence of gastric cancer have not provided definitive answers. H. pylori eradication seems to reduce the incidence of gastric cancer in patients without baseline precancerous gastric lesions. Decisional models suggest that H. pylori screening could be cost-effective, but there is not yet sufficient evidence to support the setting up of a general screening programme. CONCLUSION: Helicobacter pylori eradication is a plausible intervention for gastric cancer prevention; however, it seems to be relevant in only a subset of subjects.

¹³C breath test analysis requires accurate ¹³CO₂measurements.To perform a multicentre study to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of breath ¹³CO₂analysis.Two series of 25 paired randomly coded tubes (each consisting of 23 ¹³CO₂-enriched breath samples and two samples of standard reference pure CO₂with certified δ ¹³C(PDB)) were sent to participating centres for ¹³CO₂measurement. Each series of tubes was analysed 10 days apart. The repeatability and reproducibility of ¹³C measurements was assessed by Mandel's k and h statistics.Twenty-two centres participated in the study: 18 showed good inter- and intra-laboratory variability, whilst four showed abnormally high inter- or intra-laboratory variability. Breath test results were also significantly affected by the accuracy of the ¹³C analytical procedures.A low accuracy of ¹³C measurements may significantly affect the results of breath tests, leading to inappropriate clinical decisions. Standardization of ¹³C analysis is required to guarantee optimal ¹³C measurements and accurate ¹³C breath test results.

To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy and tolerability of two 1-week triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication.One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (LCM group), or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily (LCA group). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test, histology and 13C-urea breath test before and after therapy.At 3 months, H. pylori eradication (intention- to-treat/per protocol analysis) was 92.4%/93.8% in the LCM group and 83.1%/85.7% in the LCA group (P=N.S.). Side-effects were more frequently reported in the LCA group (37.9%) than in the LCM group (19.7%) (P0.05).In this open, randomized controlled trial, eradication of H. pylori by low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole was higher with significantly less side-effects than by full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. This finding may be related to the stronger synergism of clarithromycin plus metronidazole, even at lower doses, than of clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. Considering the lower cost as well, LCM should be preferred to LCA in the eradication of H. pylori.

As part of a cross-sectional study on cholelithiasis, 1533 out of 1840 residents in Loiano/Monghidoro, a rural area in Northern Italy (792 men, 741 women, age range 28-80 years), agreed to be further evaluated in relation to their Helicobacter pylori status.Each participant performed a 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) and provided information on sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical characteristics.The 13C-UBT was positive in 1041 subjects (67.9%; men: 69%; women: 67%) and was positively associated with increasing age (P0.001), alcohol consumption (P0.01), a higher number of siblings (P0.001) and a personal history of peptic ulcer (P0.01), but inversely with a nonmanual occupation (P0.001). Overall, H. pylori infection was unrelated to smoking, house pets, and a family history of gastroduodenal diseases. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 72% in subjects reporting one or more dyspeptic symptoms and 65% among asymptomatic participants (P0.001); a multivariate analysis showed that only epigastric pain was significantly, although weakly, associated with 13C-UBT positivity.This large population-based study showed a prevalence of H. pylori infection higher than that reported by serologic surveys in urban areas. Current H. pylori infection was strongly associated with indicators of lower socioeconomic status, alcohol consumption and increasing age. A role of H. pylori infection in determining epigastric pain was suggested.

Non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection are widely used in clinical practice and the management of patients with gastrointestinal disease. The serology and 13C-urea breath test are widely available, whereas salivary and faecal assay are still being developed. The non-invasive tests represent notable savings for the patient both in terms of money and discomfort. Whilst serology is the most widespread test its use is not advised in post-treatment follow-up. The 13C-urea breath test is a simple, safe and highly accurate method ideal to evaluate, in the short-term follow-up, Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment.

Knowledge on the role of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is continually evolving, and treatment is becoming more challenging due to increasing bacterial resistance. Since the management of HP infection is changing, an update of the national Italian guidelines delivered in 2007 was needed. In the III Working Group Consensus Report 2015, a panel of 17 experts from several Italian regions reviewed current evidence on different topics relating to HP infection. Four working groups examined the following topics: (1) “open questions” on HP diagnosis and treatment (focusing on dyspepsia, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin use and extra-gastric diseases); (2) non-invasive and invasive diagnostic tests; (3) treatment of HP infection; (4) role of HP in the prevention of gastric cancer. Statements and recommendations were discussed and a consensus reached in a final plenary session held in February 2015 in Bologna. Recommendations are based on the best current evidence to help physicians manage HP infection in Italy. The guidelines have been endorsed by the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy.

Background and Aim: Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is a cause of bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the most used endoscopic treatment for GAVE-related bleeding. Treatment failures have been described in patients with haemorrhagic diathesis; post-procedure complications include haemorrhages and septicaemia. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of APC treatment of GAVE-related bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods: Patients included were suffering from GAVE-related bleeding and liver cirrhosis. APC treatment was performed until eradication. Resolution of transfusion-dependent anaemia and evaluation of complications were the primary outcomes. Results: 20 patients (16 Child C and 4 Child B) were enrolled and prospectively followed for a mean period of 28 months. GAVE eradication was achieved in all patients after a median of 3 sessions (range 1–10). Resolution of anaemia was achieved in 18 patients. Six patients had relapse of GAVE after a mean of 7.7 months, successfully retreated by APC. Hyperplastic polyps developed in 3 patients causing active bleeding in 2 cases. Five patients had liver transplants and 1 had a relapse of GAVE after transplantation. Conclusion: APC is an effective and safe endoscopic treatment for GAVE in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Summary points Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common human infections, and about half of the world’s population carries this organism. Since its discovery in 1984, H pylori has been recognised as a major cause of several upper gastrointestinal diseases.1 2 As with other chronic infectious diseases, several antibiotics must be given simultaneously and sometimes repeated courses of different combinations of antibiotics are needed to eradicate H pylori . Eradicating H pylori is still a challenge, however, because of the rapidly increasing prevalence of multidrug resistant strains worldwide. In recent years, several randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses have proposed new regimens and treatment strategies for H pylori infection. This review will discuss the available treatment strategies for H pylori infection and help identify the most effective one. The prevalence of H pylori varies widely, with more than 80% of adults being infected in Japan and South America compared with around 40% in the United Kingdom and 20% in Scandinavia.3 Epidemiological evidence suggests that many people acquire the infection in childhood—social deprivation, household crowding, and number of siblings are important risk factors. The prevalence of infection increases with age, although this may be largely a cohort effect. Poorer socioeconomic conditions 60 …