1. Comparative in vivo bioequivalence and in vitro dissolution of two cyclosporin A soft gelatin capsule formulations
- Author
-
R Kitzes-Cohen, Abraham J. Domb, D Farin, A. Laor, and Avi Avramoff
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Metabolic Clearance Rate ,Administration, Oral ,Capsules ,Pharmacology ,Bioequivalence ,Pharmacokinetics ,In vivo ,Cyclosporin a ,Humans ,Medicine ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Dissolution testing ,Whole blood ,Cross-Over Studies ,business.industry ,Venous blood ,Crossover study ,Solubility ,Therapeutic Equivalency ,Area Under Curve ,Cyclosporine ,Gelatin ,business ,Immunosuppressive Agents - Abstract
Objective: A study was conducted to establish the bioequivalence between a newly developed cyclosporin A (CsA) oral formulation, Deximune® soft-gelatin capsules (Dexcel Ltd.) and Sandimmune Neoral® (Novartis Inc.). Materials and methods: The clinical investigation was designed as a randomized, open-labeled, two-period, two-treatment crossover study, in 24 healthy fasted male volunteers. The subjects were administered a single 200 mg CsA dose of either formulation. Serial venous blood samples were obtained over 24 hours after each administration to measure CsA in whole blood by a specific TDx-immunoassay. In addition, the comparative drug release rate was assessed using a dissolution apparatus test according to the USP-24 method. Results: For both treatments, a mean maximum blood concentration (C max ) of approximately 1,200 ng/ml was obtained at about 1.6 hours (t max ) after administration and the geometric mean of the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) both for test and reference was approximately 4,900 ng x h/ml. Bioequivalence was conclusively demonstrated for both rate (C max andt max ) and extent (AUC) of CsA absorption, between the two treatments. Moreover, the CsA blood concentration measurement at 2 hours after administration (C 2 ), demonstrated equivalent results between the two products. The point estimates and their 90% confidence intervals were within the respective equivalence ranges for the pharmacokinetic parameters and were included in the range for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index. The comparative dissolution test for both formulations showed an in vitro release rate of more than 90% within 15 minutes. Conclusions: Based on the results, the two oral CsA formulations compared are bioequivalent and can be interchanged without need for dosage adjustment.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF