Search

Abstract Background Filamentous fungi are prolific producers of bioactive molecules and enzymes with important applications in industry. Yet, the vast majority of fungal species remain undiscovered or uncharacterized. Here we focus our attention to a wild fungal isolate that we identified as Anthostomella pinea. The fungus belongs to a complex polyphyletic genus in the family of Xylariaceae, which is known to comprise endophytic and pathogenic fungi that produce a plethora of interesting secondary metabolites. Despite that, Anthostomella is largely understudied and only two species have been fully sequenced and characterized at a genomic level. Results In this work, we used long-read sequencing to obtain the complete 53.7 Mb genome sequence including the full mitochondrial DNA. We performed extensive structural and functional annotation of coding sequences, including genes encoding enzymes with potential applications in biotechnology. Among others, we found that the genome of A. pinea encodes 91 biosynthetic gene clusters, more than 600 CAZymes, and 164 P450s. Furthermore, untargeted metabolomics and molecular networking analysis of the cultivation extracts revealed a rich secondary metabolism, and in particular an abundance of sesquiterpenoids and sesquiterpene lactones. We also identified the polyketide antibiotic xanthoepocin, to which we attribute the anti–Gram-positive effect of the extracts that we observed in antibacterial plate assays. Conclusions Taken together, our results provide a first glimpse into the potential of Anthstomella pinea to provide new bioactive molecules and biocatalysts and will facilitate future research into these valuable metabolites.

Background and Objective: Combinations of VEGFR-TKIs plus ICI against PD1/PD-L1 are the standard first-line therapy for patients with mRCC, irrespective of the prognostic class. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of withdrawing the VEGFR-TKI but continuing the anti- PD1/PD-L1 in patients who achieve response to their combination., Methods: This was a single-arm phase 2 trial in patients with treatment naïve mRCC with prior nephrectomy, without symptomatic/bulky disease and no liver metastases. Enrolled patients received axitinib+avelumab, after 36 weeks of therapy those who achieved tumor response interrupted axitinib and continued avelumab maintenance until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients without progression eight weeks after the axitinib interruption. Secondary endpoints were the median value for progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) and the safety in the overall population., Key Findings and Limitations: 79 patients were enrolled and 75 evaluated for efficacy. A total of 29 (38%) patients had axitinib withdrawn, as per the study design, with 72% of them having no progression after eight weeks and thus achieving the primary endpoint. The mPFS of the overall population was 24 months while the mOS was not reached. The ORR was 76% (12% CR, 64% PR), with 19% of patients having stable disease. In the patients who discontinued axitinib, the incidence of AEs of any grade was 59% and 3% for grade 3 or 4. This study was limited by the lack of the comparative arm., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: The TIDE-A study demonstrates that the withdrawal of VEGFR-TKI with ICI maintenance is feasible for selected mRCC patients with evidence of response to the VEGFR-TKI+ICI combination employed in first-line therapy. Axitinib interruption with avelumab maintenance led to decreased side effects and should be further investigated as a new strategy to delay tumor progression., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are cornerstones of first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma; however, optimal treatment sequencing after progression is unknown. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes of tivozanib-nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed following one or two lines of therapy in the post-ICI setting., Methods: TiNivo-2 is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 190 sites across 16 countries, in Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and progression during or after one to two previous lines of therapy (including one ICI) were randomised 1:1 to tivozanib (0·89 mg per day, orally) plus nivolumab (480 mg every 4 weeks, intravenously) or tivozanib (1·34 mg per day, orally). Randomisation was stratified by immediate previous therapy (ICI or non-ICI) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk category. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to first documentation of objective progressive disease according to RECIST 1·1 or death from any cause, whichever came first, by independent radiology review. Efficacy was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was assessed in patients who received one or more doses of the study drug. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04987203) and is active and not recruiting., Findings: From Nov 4, 2021, to June 16, 2023, 343 patients were randomly assigned to tivozanib-nivolumab (n=171) or tivozanib monotherapy (n=172). Median follow-up was 12·0 months. Median PFS was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0-7·4) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 7·4 months (5·6-9·2) with tivozanib monotherapy (hazard ratio 1·10, 95% CI 0·84-1·43; p=0·49). Among those with an ICI as their immediate previous therapy (n=244), median PFS was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6-9·6) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 9·2 months (7·4-10·0) with tivozanib monotherapy. With non-ICIs as the most recent therapy, lower median PFS was observed, with no difference between groups (tivozanib-nivolumab 3·7 months [95% CI 2·7-5·4] and with tivozanib monotherapy 3·7 months [1·9-7·2]). Serious adverse events occurred in 54 (32%) of 168 patients receiving tivozanib-nivolumab and 64 (37%) of 171 patients receiving tivozanib monotherapy. One (<1%) treatment-related death occurred (tivozanib group)., Interpretation: These data further support that ICI rechallenge should be discouraged in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, these data suggest that tivozanib monotherapy has efficacy in the post-ICI setting., Funding: Aveo Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TKC reports institutional and personal paid or unpaid support for research, advisory board participation, consultancy, and honoraria within the past 5 years from Alkermes, Arcus Bio, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, HiberCell, IQVIA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Neomorph, Nuscan and Precede Bio, Novartis, Oncohost, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, and Tempest and equity in Tempest, Pionyr, Osel, Precede Bio, CureResponse, InnDura Therapeutics, and Primium. LA reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas, Merck, MSD, Janssen, Eisai, and Amgen and support for travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Ipsen, and Pfizer. PB reports grants or contracts from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Exelixis, Ipsen, Merck, Gilead, Janssen, AAA Pharmaceutical, and Bayer; consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, AAA Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, AAA Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; and reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, AAA Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and AstraZeneca. SE reports consulting fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Kephren and support for attending meetings and travel from MSD, Chugai, Pfizer, and Janssen. JM-C reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen, Pfizer, Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, Janssen, Astellas, Eisai, Adacap, Lilly, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Adium, and Asofarma; support for attending meetings and travel from Ipsen, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Ipsen, Pfizer, Astellas, Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD. BG reports research funding grants from AbbVie, Accutar Biotechnology, Arcus Biosciences, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, AVEO Oncology, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eikon Therapeutics, Exelixis, Roche and Genentech, Flare Therapeutics, Harbour BioMed, IDEAYA Biosciences, Janssen, Janux Therapeutics, Jubilant Therapeutics, Kineta, Kinnate BioPharma, Loxo, Mink Therapeutics, Nuvation Bio, Profound Bio, Takeda Therapeutics, Teon Therapeutics, Tmunity Therapeutics, Xencor, and Zenshine and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Adicent Therapeutics, AIQ Global, Amgen, Arcus Biosciences, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, AVEO Oncology, Bayer, Bicycle Therapeutics, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Rondo Therapeutics, Sanofi–Aventis, Seagen, and Xencor. PB reports honoraria from UroToday; consulting or advising fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Eisai, Caris Life Sciences, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Aveo, Merck, Ipson, and Dendreon; speakers bureau funding from AstraZeneca, Caris Life Sciences, Bayer, Pfizer and Astellas, and Merck; and research funding from Exelixis, Aveo, Blue Earth, Pfizer, and Merck. AB reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Cardinal Health, Eisai, and Natera; consulting or advising fees from EMD Serono, Seattle Genetics, and Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer; speakers bureau funds from Eisai; and research funding from Merck, EMD Serono, Natera, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb and Celgene, Genentech and Roche, and Aveo. MTB reports consulting fees, payment or honoraria, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Bristol Myers Squibb. HM reports honoraria from EMD Serono and Pfizer; research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Arcus Bioscience, Apollomics, Nektar, RevImmune, HUYA Bioscience International, Aveo, Xencor, and Pfizer; and travel accommodations or expenses from Aveo, Seagen, Bayer, and Genentech. RR reports honoraria from Ipsen, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Advanced Accelerator Applications, and Eisai; consulting or advisory fees from Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Ipsen, and MSD; and travel accommodations or expenses from Ipsen, MSD Oncology, and Janssen. RRM reports consulting or advisory roles for Janssen, Novartis, Tempus, Exelixis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Medivation, Dendreon, Bayer, Sanofi, Merck, Vividion, Calithera, AstraZeneca, Myovant, Caris Life Sciences, Sorrento Therapeutics, Aveo, Seattle Genetics, Telix, Eli Lilly, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ambrx, Arcus Biosciences, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Eisai, and NeoMorph and research funding from Bayer, Tempus, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Oncternal Therapeutics, and Artera. AC-R reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from OncLive and MJH Life Sciences, ASCO Direct, Exelixis, Medical Oncology Association of Southern California, EPG Health, Eisai Co, Aveo, and Seagen. HH reports grants or contracts for clinical trial support from Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Agenus, Hoosier, and Aveo and advisory consulting fees from Eisai, Aveo, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb. DYCH reports consultancy fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, Eisai, and Merck and research funding from Pfizer, Novartis, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Ipsen. EB reports funding for the provision of study materials, medical writing, or article processing charges from Aveo Oncology and stock or stock options from Autolus. KEB reports grants funding from Bristol Myers Squibb–Lung Cancer Foundation of America–International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aravive, Pionyr, and Arsenal Bio; consulting fees from Aravive, Aveo, Alpine Bioscience, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Adicet, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Eisai, Merck, Nimbus, and Xencor; and honoraria funding from Merck. BAM reports grants to his institution from Aveo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Gilead, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Arcus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Gilead, Lily, and Pfizer; payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Targeted Oncology, Dava Oncology, Aptitude Health, and Curio; and patents planned, issued, or pending with Gilead. RJM reports consulting fees from Aveo, Merck, Exelixis, and Takeda, grants or contracts from Pfizer, Genentech and Roche, Eisai, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Exelixis; and data safety monitoring and advisory board participation fees from Incyte. RI reports no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Fungal aromatic prenyltransferases are a family of biosynthetic enzymes that catalyze the prenylation of a range of aromatic substrates during the biosynthesis of bioactive indole alkaloids, diketopiperazines, and meroterpenoids. Their broad substrate scope and soluble nature make these enzymes particularly adept for applications in biocatalysis; for example, the enzymatic derivatization of aromatic drugs improves their bioactivity. Here, we investigated four putative aromatic prenyltransferases from lichen-forming fungi, an underexplored group of organisms that produce more than 1,000 unique metabolites. We successfully expressed two enzymes, annotated as dimethylallyltryptophan synthases, from two lichen species in the heterologous host A. oryzae . Based on their in vivo activity, we hypothesize that these enzymes are in fact 4- O -dimethylallyl-l-tyrosine synthases. Our extensive bioinformatic analysis further confirmed that these and related lichen aromatic prenyltransferases are likely not active on indoles but rather on aromatic polyketides and phenylpropanoids, major metabolites in lichens. Overall, our work provides new insights into fungal aromatic prenyltransferases at the family level and enables future efforts aimed at identifying new candidates for biocatalytic transformations of aromatic compounds.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) carrying sarcomatoid features (sRCC) has aggressive biology and poor prognosis. First-line immunotherapy (IO)-based combinations have improved the outcome of clear cell RCC patients, including that of sRCC. Real-world data confirming the adequate first-line management of sRCC is largely lacking. We investigated the clinical features and the outcome of sRCC patients treated with IO-based combinations within the ARON-1 study population (NCT05287464). The primary objective was to define the incidence and baseline clinical characteristics of sRCC compared with non-sRCC patients. The secondary objective was to describe the outcome of sRCC patients based on type of first-line treatment (IO + IO vs. IO + tyrosin kinase inhibitor [TKI]). We identified 1362 mRCC patients with IMDC intermediate or poor risk, 226 sRCC and 1136 non-sRCC. These two subgroups did not differ in terms of baseline characteristics. The median overall survival (OS) was 26.8 months (95%CI 21.6-44.2) in sRCC and 35.3 months (95%CI 30.2-40.4) in non-sRCC patients (p = .013). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in non-sRCC patients compared to sRCC (14.5 vs. 12.3 months, p = .064). In patients treated with first-line IO + TKI the median OS was 34.4 months compared to 26.4 months of those who received IO + IO (p = .729). The median PFS was 12.4 months with IO + TKI and 12.3 months with IO + IO (p = .606). In conclusion, we confirm that sRCC are aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. IO-based combinations improve survival outcomes of sRCC patients, regardless from the type of strategy (IO + IO versus IO + TKI) adopted., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Background: Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor, showed clinical activity in clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma in early-phase studies., Methods: In a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled trial, we enrolled participants with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had previously received immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic therapies and randomly assigned them, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive 120 mg of belzutifan or 10 mg of everolimus orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. The dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. The key secondary end point was the occurrence of an objective response (a confirmed complete or partial response)., Results: A total of 374 participants were assigned to belzutifan, and 372 to everolimus. At the first interim analysis (median follow-up, 18.4 months), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in both groups; at 18 months, 24.0% of the participants in the belzutifan group and 8.3% in the everolimus group were alive and free of progression (two-sided P = 0.002, which met the prespecified significance criterion). A confirmed objective response occurred in 21.9% of the participants (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.8 to 26.5) in the belzutifan group and in 3.5% (95% CI, 1.9 to 5.9) in the everolimus group (P<0.001, which met the prespecified significance criterion). At the second interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.7 months), the median overall survival was 21.4 months in the belzutifan group and 18.1 months in the everolimus group; at 18 months, 55.2% and 50.6% of the participants, respectively, were alive (hazard ratio for death, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.07; two-sided P = 0.20, which did not meet the prespecified significance criterion). Grade 3 or higher adverse events of any cause occurred in 61.8% of the participants in the belzutifan group (grade 5 in 3.5%) and in 62.5% in the everolimus group (grade 5 in 5.3%). Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in 5.9% and 14.7% of the participants, respectively., Conclusions: Belzutifan showed a significant benefit over everolimus with respect to progression-free survival and objective response in participants with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had previously received immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic therapies. Belzutifan was associated with no new safety signals. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; LITESPARK-005 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04195750.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

In this article, we report the breakthrough acquisitions for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. The results from Keynote 564 showed an impressive overall survival (OS) advantage for pembrolizumab, in patients at higher risk of relapse after surgery and confirmed the benefit in terms of disease-free survival (DFS). Until now, pembrolizumab is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to prove a survival advantage. On the contrary, the results from CheckMate 914 trial showed the lack of benefit of adjuvant nivolumab. In the metastatic setting, the longer-term follow-up data of the CheckMate 9ER and CheckMate 214 trials reassessed the undoubtable role of ICI-based combination in first-line treatment, with a clear survival advantage in the subgroup of patients at intermediate/poor IMDC prognosis. No OS advantage was seen in favorable IMDC risk group patients. This 2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium laid the foundations for further knowledge development necessary for an increasingly personalized therapy for RCC patients.

The 2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium, this year celebrating the 20th anniversary, delved into key advancements in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and prostate cancer (PC). For UC, insights emerged from adjuvant pembrolizumab for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, and from the efficacy of the EV-302 study of enfortumab vedotin +pembrolizumab in the metastatic setting. In PC, adjuvant therapy with high-dose radiotherapy schedules plus long-t erm ADT was explored. In metastatic castration-resistant PC, highlights included a novel combo (cabozantinib+atezolizumab) for poor prognosis patients; confirmed benefits of ARSI+PARPi in BRCA-mutated patients; and safety considerations for ARSI treatments. The symposium continued its role as an indispensable platform for shaping specialized oncological care.

Introduction: Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be responsible for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relative risk (RR) of MACEs and hypertension in cancer patients treated with ICI+TKI combinations., Research Design and Methods: We selected prospective trials through MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCOMeeting abstracts. We calculated combined ORs, RRs, and 95% CIs using RevMansoftware for meta-analysis (v.5.2.3)., Results: Seven studies were selected for the analysis of MACEs (3849 patients). The incidence MACEs were 0.8% with ICI+TKI combinations, compared to 0.2% in the control arms for both any- and high-grade. ICI+TKI combinations significantly increased the risk of any- (OR = 3.21; p  = 0.01) and high-grade MACEs (OR = 2.72; p  = 0.05). Ten studies were selected for the analysis of hypertension (5744 patients). The incidence of treatment-related hypertension of any-grade and high-grade was41.3% (vs. 20.8%) and 26.1% (vs. 12.3%) with ICI+TKI combinations, respectively. ICI+TKI combinations significantly increased the risk of treatment-related hypertension of any-grade (RR = 2.10; p  = 0.001), but not of high-grade ( p  = 0.11)., Conclusions: ICI+TKI combinations increase the risk of MACEs compared to controls, although the absolute incidence is eventually low. Routine cardiovascular monitoring in asymptomatic patients is therefore not recommended.

Introduction: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare tumor with an aggressive behavior. The Meet-URO 23/I-RARE registry includes rare genitourinary malignancies. We extracted patients with PSCC to conduct a retrospective study aimed at assessing clinical outcomes and prognostic factors., Patients and Methods: Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. Prognostic factors for OS and PFS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. From the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database, we extracted 128 patients with diagnosis of PSCC. About 48% of patients underwent first-line of therapy., Results: In the overall population, median OS from diagnosis was 34.6 months. Significant differences in median OS were observed according to ECOG PS at diagnosis (57.3 months vs. 8.3 months; P < .001), and median age (≤77y 88.8 months vs. >77y 26 months; P = .013). At multivariate analysis, ECOG PS 2-4 at diagnosis (HR 3.04) and lymph node metastases (HR 2.49) were independently associated with a higher risk of death. Among patients undergoing first-line therapy (n = 61), median OS was 12.3 months, and a statistically significant difference was found according to type of response to first-line (DCR 24.4 months vs. PD 7.1 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that only age >77 years was associated with a worse OS (HR 2.16). A statistically significant difference in PFS was found according to platinum plus 5-fluorouracil versus platinum plus taxane (4.9 vs. 3.4 months; P = .036) and regimens with 2 versus 3 drugs (3.4 vs. 8.6 months; P = .019). At the multivariate analysis only regimens with platinum plus taxane were associated with worse PFS (HR 2.83)., Conclusion: In our registry study, PSCC is confirmed to be an aggressive disease. Poor ECOG PS, presence of lymph node metastases, and higher age at diagnosis appear to be associated with worse survival outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure The other authors declare no conflict of interest. Francesco Pierantoni: Advisory board: Eli Lilly; Speaker and travel fees: Pfizer, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Jannsen, Takeda, Merck, Astellas, Ipsen. Paola Ermacora: MSD, BMS, AAA, Astellas, Recordati, Eisai (advisory board), Jansenn (travel grant)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed previous treatment paradigm of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). The ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients with documented metastatic UC treated by pembrolizumab as second-line therapy were retrospectively collected from 88 institutions in 23 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Cox proportional hazards models were adopted to explore the presence of prognostic factors., Results: In total, 836 patients were included: 544 patients (65%) received pembrolizumab after progression to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (cohort A) and 292 (35%) after recurring within < 12 months since the completion of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cohort B). The median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The median OS and the ORR were 10.5 months and 31% in the overall study population, 9.1 months and 29% in cohort A and 14.6 months and 37% in cohort B. At multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS ≥ 2, bone metastases, liver metastases and pembrolizumab setting (cohort A vs B) proved to be significantly associated with worst OS and PFS. Stratified by the presence of 0, 1-2 or 3-4 prognostic factors, the median OS was 29.4, 12.5 and 4.1 months (p < 0.001), while the median PFS was 12.2, 6.4 and 2.8 months, respectively (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study confirms that pembrolizumab is effective in the advanced UC real-world context, showing outcome differences between patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Immunotherapy combinations with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had significantly improved outcomes of patients with mRCC. Predictive and prognostic factors are crucial to improve patients' counseling and management. The present study aimed to externally validate the prognostic value of a previously developed red cell-based score, including hemoglobin (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW), in patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations (TKI plus ICI or ICI plus ICI). We performed a sub-analysis of a multicentre retrospective observational study (ARON-1 project) involving patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the correlation between the red cell-based score and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression were used to estimate the correlation between the score and the objective response rate (ORR). The prognostic impact of the red cell-based score on PFS and OS was confirmed in the whole population regardless of the immunotherapy combination used [median PFS (mPFS): 17.4 vs 8.2 months, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.94; median OS (mOS): 42.0 vs 17.3 months, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.92; p < 0.001 for both]. We validated the prognostic significance of the red cell-based score in patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations. The score is easy to use in daily clinical practice and it might improve patient counselling., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the last years, theranostics has expanded the therapeutic options available for prostate cancer patients. In this review, we explore this dynamic field and its potential to revolutionize precision medicine for prostate cancer. We delve into the foundational principles, clinical applications, and emerging opportunities, emphasizing the potential synergy between radioligand therapy and other systemic treatments. Additionally, we address the ongoing challenges, including optimizing patient selection, assessing treatment responses, and determining the role of theranostics within the broader landscape of prostate cancer treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Inflammation is widely acknowledged as a significant characteristic of cancer, playing a substantial function in both the initiation and advancement of cancers. In this research, we planned to compare pan-immune inflammation markers and other well-known markers (systemic immune inflammation index and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio) to predict prognosis in individuals treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer., Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we focused on preoperative PIV, systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in 193 individuals managed with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between January 2016 and November 2022. Multivariable logistic regression assessments were performed to assess the predictive capabilities of PIV, SII, and NLR for infiltration of lymph nodes (N), aggressive tumor stage (pT3/pT4), and any non-organ limited disease at the time of RC. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the predictive impact of PIV on Relapse-free survival (RFS), Cancer-specific survival (CSS), and Overall survival (OS)., Results: Our individuals were divided into high PIV and low PIV cohorts using the optimal cut-off value (340.96 × 10 9 /L) based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for relapse-free survival. In multivariable preoperative logistic regression models, only SII and PIV correlated with the infiltration of lymph nodes, aggressive disease, and any non-organ confined disease. In multivariable Cox regression models considering presurgical clinicopathological variables, a higher PIV was associated with diminished RFS ( p = 0.017) and OS ( p = 0.029). In addition, in multivariable Cox regression models for postoperative outcomes, a high PIV correlated with both RFS ( p = 0.034) and OS ( p = 0.048)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that PIV and SII are two very similar markers that may serve as independent and significant predictors of aggressive disease and worse survival impacts on individuals undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder neoplasm.

Background: Renal c carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urinary cancers worldwide, with a predicted increase in incidence in the coming years. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, in doublets, or in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has rapidly become a cornerstone of the RCC therapeutic scenario, but no head-to-head comparisons have been made. In this setting, real-world evidence emerges as a cornerstone to guide clinical decisions., Objective: The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with first-line immune combinations or immune oncology (IO)-TKIs for advanced RCC., Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from 930 patients, 654 intermediate risk and 276 poor risk, were collected retrospectively from 58 centers in 20 countries. Special data such as sarcomatoid differentiation, body mass index, prior nephrectomy, and metastatic localization, in addition to biochemical data such as hemoglobin, platelets, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophils, and radiological response by investigator's criteria, were collected., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was calculated by the inverse Kaplan-Meier method., Results and Limitations: The median follow-up time was 18.7 mo. In the 654 intermediate-risk patients, the median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with the intermediate than in those with the poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria (38.9 vs 17.3 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] p < 0.001, and 17.3 vs 11.6 mo, 95% CI p < 0.001, respectively). In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the OS was 55.7 mo (95% CI 31.4-55.7) and 40.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p = 0.047). PFS was 30.7 mo (95% CI 16.5-55.7) and 13.2 mo (95% CI 29.6-51.6) in intermediate-risk patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p < 0.001). In the poor-risk subgroup, the median OS and PFS did not show a statistically significant difference between IO + IO and IO + TKI. Our study presents several limitations, mainly due to its retrospective nature., Conclusions: Our results showed differences between the IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations in intermediate-risk patients. A clear association with longer PFS and OS in favor of patients who received the IO + TKI combinations compared with the IO-IO combination was observed. Instead, in the poor-risk group, we observed no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients who received different combinations., Patient Summary: Renal cancer is one of the most frequent genitourinary tumors. Treatment is currently based on immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but there are no comparisons between these.In this study, we have analyzed the clinical course of 930 patients from 58 centers in 20 countries around the world. We aimed to analyze the differences between the two main treatment strategies, combination of two immunotherapies versus immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy, and found in real-life data that intermediate-risk patients (approximately 60% of patients with metastatic renal cancer) seem to benefit more from the combination of immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy than from double immunotherapy. No such differences were found in poor-risk patients. This may have important implications in daily practice decision-making for these patients., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In recent years, the first-line available therapeutic options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have radically changed with the introduction into clinical practice of new immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations. Many efforts are focusing on identifying novel prognostic and predictive markers in this setting. The complement system (CS) plays a central role in promoting the growth and progression of mRCC. In particular, mRCC has been defined as an "aggressive complement tumor", which encompasses a group of malignancies with poor prognosie and highly expressed complement components. Several preclinical and retrospective studies have demonstrated the negative prognostic role of the complement in mRCC; however, there is little evidence on its possible role as a predictor of the response to ICIs. The purpose of this review is to explore more deeply the physio-pathological role of the complement in the development of RCC and its possible future use in clinical practice as a prognostic and predictive factor.

Background: Filamentous fungi are prolific producers of bioactive molecules and enzymes with important applications in industry. Yet, the vast majority of fungal species remain undiscovered or uncharacterized. Here we focus our attention to a wild fungal isolate that we identified as Anthostomella pinea. The fungus belongs to a complex polyphyletic genus in the family of Xylariaceae, which is known to comprise endophytic and pathogenic fungi that produce a plethora of interesting secondary metabolites. Despite that, Anthostomella is largely understudied and only two species have been fully sequenced and characterized at a genomic level., Results: In this work, we used long-read sequencing to obtain the complete 53.7 Mb genome sequence including the full mitochondrial DNA. We performed extensive structural and functional annotation of coding sequences, including genes encoding enzymes with potential applications in biotechnology. Among others, we found that the genome of A. pinea encodes 91 biosynthetic gene clusters, more than 600 CAZymes, and 164 P450s. Furthermore, untargeted metabolomics and molecular networking analysis of the cultivation extracts revealed a rich secondary metabolism, and in particular an abundance of sesquiterpenoids and sesquiterpene lactones. We also identified the polyketide antibiotic xanthoepocin, to which we attribute the anti-Gram-positive effect of the extracts that we observed in antibacterial plate assays., Conclusions: Taken together, our results provide a first glimpse into the potential of Anthstomella pinea to provide new bioactive molecules and biocatalysts and will facilitate future research into these valuable metabolites., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Naringenin is a natural product with several reported bioactivities and is the key intermediate for the entire class of plant flavonoids. The translation of flavonoids into modern medicine as pure compounds is often hampered by their low abundance in nature and their difficult chemical synthesis. Here, we investigated the possibility to use the filamentous fungus Penicillium rubens as a host for flavonoid production. P. rubens is a well-characterized, highly engineered, traditional "workhorse" for the production of β-lactam antibiotics. We integrated two plant genes encoding enzymes in the naringenin biosynthesis pathway into the genome of the secondary metabolite-deficient P. rubens 4xKO strain. After optimization of the fermentation conditions, we obtained an excellent molar yield of naringenin from fed p- coumaric acid (88%) with a titer of 0.88 mM. Along with product accumulation over 36 h, however, we also observed rapid degradation of naringenin. Based on high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis, we propose a naringenin degradation pathway in P. rubens 4xKO, which is distinct from other flavonoid-converting pathways reported in fungi. Our work demonstrates that P. rubens is a promising host for recombinant flavonoid production, and it represents an interesting starting point for further investigation into the utilization of plant biomass by filamentous fungi.

Background: The goal of precision medicine in prostate cancer (PCa) is to individualize the treatment according to the patient's germline mutation status. PCa has a very high rate of genetic predisposition compared with other cancers in men, with an estimated rate of cancers ascribable to hereditary factors of 5-15%., Methods: A systematic search (PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) of English literature from 2000 to 2022, using the keywords "prostate cancer", "germline mutations", "family history", and "inheritance" was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines., Results: The search identified 980 publications. Of these, 200 papers were removed before screening (duplicates, non-English literature, and publication year before 2000) and 245 records were excluded after title/abstract screening. Finally, 50 articles were included in the final analysis. We analyze the latest evidence on the genetic basis of PCa predisposition and clinical implications for more personalized screening protocols and therapeutic management of this high-prevalent cancer., Discussion: Emerging data show that germline mutations in homologous recombination genes (BRCA1/2, ATM, CHECK2), in mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MLH2, MSH6), and other additional genes are associated with the development and aggressiveness of PCa. Germline testing and genetic counseling have increasingly important implications in cancer screening and therapeutic decisions making for patients affected by PCa. Patients with localized PCa and some gene mutations are more likely to develop aggressive cancer, so active treatment may be preferable to active surveillance for these patients. Moreover, in patients with metastatic PCa, these gene alterations may be useful biomarkers for predicting response to specific therapy such as PARP inhibitors, recently approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant PCa. The evidence supports recent guidelines and recommendations considering germline genetic testing for patients with a positive family history of PCa or men with high risk or metastatic disease., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background and Objectives : To assess the potential prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in predicting oncological outcomes in a cohort of patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). Materials and Methods : From 2016 to 2022, a retrospective monocentric study enrolled 193 patients who were divided into two groups based on their SII levels using the optimal cutoff determined by the Youden index. The SII was obtained from a preoperative blood test approximately one month before RC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the capacity of SII to predict lymph node invasion (N), advanced pT stage (pT3/pT4), and locally advanced condition at the time of RC. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for preoperative and postoperative features were used to analyze the prognostic effect of SII on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results : The optimal cutoff value of the SII was 640.27. An elevated SII was seen in 113 (58.5%) patients. Using the multivariable preoperative logistic regression models, an elevated SII was correlated with nodal invasion (N; p = 0.03), advanced pT stage ( p = 0.04), and locally advanced disease ( p = 0.005), with enhancement of AUCs for predicting locally advanced disease ( p = 0.04). In multivariable Cox regression models that considered preoperative clinicopathologic factors, an elevated SII was linked to poorer RFS ( p = 0.005) and OS ( p = 0.01). Moreover, on multivariable Cox regression postoperative models, a high SII was linked to RFS ( p = 0.004) and to OS ( p = 0.01). Conclusions : In this monocentric retrospective study, higher preoperative SII values predicted worse oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) who underwent RC.

Background: Concomitant medications may potentially affect the outcome of cancer patients. In this sub-analysis of the ARON-2 real-world study (NCT05290038), we aimed to assess the impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), statins, or metformin on outcome of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) receiving second-line pembrolizumab., Methods: We collected data from the hospital medical records of patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at 87 institutions from 22 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model., Results: A total of 802 patients were eligible for this retrospective study; the median follow-up time was 15.3 months. PPI users compared to non-users showed inferior PFS (4.5 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.002) and OS (8.7 vs. 14.1 months, p < 0.001). Concomitant PPI use remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS after multivariate Cox analysis. The use of statins or metformin was not associated with response or survival., Conclusions: Our study results suggest a significant prognostic impact of concomitant PPI use in mUC patients receiving pembrolizumab in the real-world context. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose of Review: To discuss recent advances in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) and how best to incorporate new therapies into clinical practice., Recent Findings: There have been several recent practice-changing phase 2 and 3 trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted agents in advanced UC. Based on data from these trials, ICIs can be used as first-line maintenance therapy in patients who do not progress on platinum-based chemotherapy, second-line therapy for those with progression, and first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients with PD-L1 expression; ADCs and targeted agents provide later-line treatment options. Despite substantial progress in the treatment of advanced UC, there are still many uncertainties, including the optimal treatment sequence for novel agents, and reliable predictive biomarkers to aid in treatment selection. There is also an unmet need for effective treatment options in patients unfit for any platinum-based chemotherapy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Obesity has been associated with improved response to immunotherapy in cancer patients. We investigated the role of body mass index (BMI) in patients from the ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) treated by dual immuno-oncology agents (IO+IO) or a combination of immuno-oncology drug and a tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients with documented mRCC treated by immuno-oncology combinations were reviewed at 47 institutions from 16 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (OS), and overall clinical benefit (OCB), defined as the sum of the rate of partial/complete responses and stable disease. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with survival., Results: A total of 675 patients were included; BMI was >25 kg/m 2 in 345 patients (51%) and was associated with improved OS (55.7 vs. 28.4 months, P < .001). The OCB of patients with BMI >25 kg/m 2 versus those with BMI ≤25 kg/m 2 was significantly higher only in patients with nonclear cell histology (81% vs. 65%, P = .011), and patients with liver metastases (76% vs. 58%, P = .007), Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >4 (77% vs 62%, P = .022) or treated by nivolumab plus ipilimumab (77% vs. 64%, P = .044). In the BMI ≤25 kg/m 2 subgroup, significant differences were found between patients with NLR >4 versus ≤4 (62% vs. 82%, P = .002) and patients treated by IO+IO versus IO+TKIs combinations (64% vs. 83%, P = .002)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that the prognostic significance and the association of BMI with treatment outcome varies across clinico-pathological mRCC subgroups., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: While surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is curative for many patients, others may relapse and could benefit from adjuvant treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been proposed as a potential adjuvant therapy for improving survival in these patients, but the benefit/risk ratio of ICI in the perioperative setting remains unclear., Methods: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of phase III trials of perioperative ICI (anti PD1/PD-L1 alone or in combination with anti-CTLA4 agents) in RCC was conducted., Results: The analysis included results from 4 phase III trials, comprising 3,407 patients. ICI did not show a significant increase in disease-free survival (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.04; p: 0.11) or overall survival [OS] (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.40-1.34; p: 0.31). High-grade adverse events were more frequent in the immunotherapy arm (OR 2.65; 95% CI 1.53-4.59; p: <0.001), and high-grade treatment-related adverse events were 8 times more frequent in the experimental arm (OR: 8.07; 95% CI: 3.14-20.75; p: <0.001). Subgroup analyses showed statistically significant differences favoring the experimental arm in females (HR: 0.71; 95 CI 0.55-0.92; p: 0.009), in sarcomatoid differentiation (HR: 0.60 95% CI 0.41-0.89; p: 0.01), and PD-L1 positive tumors (HR HR: 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90; p: 0.003). No significant effect was found in patients according to age, type of nephrectomy (radical vs. partial), and stage (M1 without evidence of disease vs. M0 patients)., Conclusion: Our comprehensive meta-analysis generally suggests that immunotherapy does not confer a survival advantage in the perioperative setting for RCC, with the exception of one positive study. While the overall results are not statistically significant, individual patient factors and other variables may play a role in determining who benefits from immunotherapy. Therefore, despite the mixed findings, immunotherapy may still be a viable treatment option for certain patients, and further studies are needed to determine which patient subgroups would be most likely to benefit., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This research did not receive additional support from an organization beyond the authors’ academic institutions. Guillermo de Velasco: GDV is supported by ISCIII-AES-2021 PI21/01922 Consulting and advisory services from Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Roche, Ipsen, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD and Merck; research funding from Ipsen; and Honoraria, travel and accommodation expenses from Pfizer, Ipsen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Astellas Pharma and Roche; Daniel Castellano: Consulting or Advisory Role—Astellas Pharma; AstraZeneca; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Janssen Oncology; Lilly; MSD Oncology; Novartis; Pfizer; Pierre Fabre; Roche/Genentech; Sanofi; Roberto Iacovelli: Advisory Board member—Astellas, BMS, EISAI, IPSEN, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi. Consultant for Astellas, EISAI, MSD, Pfizer; Laurence Albiges: Consulting/advisory role—BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Cerulean; research funding—Pfizer and Novartis. Rest of authors including corresponding author confirm no other conflict of interest to disclose. The authors declare there are no patents to disclose. The authors declare there are not addition relationships or activities to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors has challenged previous treatment paradigms for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the post-platinum setting as well as in the first-line setting for cisplatin-ineligible patients. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible UC., Methods: Data from patients aged ≥ 18 years with cisplatin-ineligible UC and receiving first-line pembrolizumab from January 1st 2017 to September 1st 2022 were collected. Cisplatin ineligibility was defined according to the Galsky criteria. Thirty-three Institutions from 18 countries were involved in the ARON-2 study., Results: Our analysis included 162 patients. The median follow-up time was 18.9 months (95%CI 15.3-76.9). In the overall study population, the median OS was 15.8 months (95%CI 11.3-32.4). The median OS was significantly longer in males versus females while no statistically significant differences were observed between patients aged < 65y versus ≥ 65y and between smokers and non-smokers. According to Recist 1.1 criteria, 26 patients (16%) experienced CR, 32 (20%) PR, 39 (24%) SD and 55 (34%) PD., Conclusions: Our data confirm the role of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for cisplatin-unfit patients. Further studies investigating the biological and immunological characteristics of UC patients are warranted in order to optimize the outcome of patients receiving immunotherapy in this setting., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The upfront treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune-based combinations. The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in these patients is still debated. The ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) was designed to globally analyze real-world data of mRCC patients receiving first-line immuno-oncology combinations. This sub-analysis is focused on the role of upfront or delayed partial or radical CN in three geographical areas (Western Europe, Eastern Europe, America/Asia)., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study in mRCC patients treated with first-line immune combinations from 55 centers in 19 countries. From 1152 patients in the ARON-1 dataset, we selected 651 patients with de novo mRCC. 255 patients (39%) had undergone CN, partial in 14% and radical in 86% of cases; 396 patients (61%) received first-line immune-combinations without previous nephrectomy., Results: Median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of de novo mRCC was 41.6 months and not reached (NR) in the CN subgroup and 24.0 months in the no CN subgroup, respectively (P<0.001). Median OS from the start of first-line therapy was NR in patients who underwent CN and 22.4 months in the no CN subgroup (P<0.001). Patients who underwent CN reported longer OS compared to no CN in all the three geographical areas., Conclusions: No significant differences in terms of patients' outcome seem to clearly emerge, even if the rate CN and the choice of the type of first-line immune-based combination varies across the different Cancer Centers participating in the ARON-1 project.

Introduction: Advanced urothelial carcinoma remains aggressive and very hard to cure, while new treatments will pose a challenge for clinicians and healthcare funding policymakers alike. The U-CHANGE Project aimed to redesign the current model of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma patients to identify limitations ("as is" scenario) and recommend future actions ("to be" scenario)., Methods: Twenty-three subject-matter experts, divided into three groups, analyzed the two scenarios as part of a multidimensional consensus process, developing statements for specific domains of the disease, and a simplified Delphi methodology was used to establish consensus among the experts., Results: Recommended actions included increasing awareness of the disease, increased training of healthcare professionals, improvement of screening strategies and care pathways, increased support for patients and caregivers and relevant recommendations from molecular tumor boards when comprehensive genomic profiling has to be provided for appropriate patient selection to ad hoc targeted therapies., Discussion: While the innovative new targeted agents have the potential to significantly alter the clinical approach to this highly aggressive disease, the U-CHANGE Project experience shows that the use of these new agents will require a radical shift in the entire model of care, implementing sustainable changes which anticipate the benefits of future treatments, capable of targeting the right patient with the right agent at different stages of the disease., Competing Interests: GLC has received speaker fees, research and educational grants from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Pfizer. GNC has received speaker fees, research and educational grants from Janssen, Astellas, Bayer, Recordati, MSD, Astrazeneca, IPSEN. VB has received speakers fees from Janssen and Astellas. PB has received speaker fees, research and educational grants from Astellas, Astrazeneca, BeiGene, Dephaforum, EISAI, Eli Lilly, Excerptamedica, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag SpA, Merck Serono Spa, MSD, Novartis, PierreFabre, Pharmagenesis, Reithera srl, Roche, Rottapharm, Sanofi, Servier, Takeda, Takis, and Toscana Life Science. Outside of the submitted work, PZ reports personal fees for advisory roles, speaker engagements and travel and accommodation expenses from MSD, Merck Serono Spa, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag SpA, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pizer, Noartis, BMS, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche and Bayer. SB was advisory board or Steering Committee Member uncompensated for: Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, Pfizer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, MSD, AAA, Sanofi, Merck, Astrazeneca. GP reports fees as advisory board and expertise dossier on clinical-epidemiological evaluations for Astellas, BMS, Merck, MSD. RI served as an advisory board member or consultant for Astellas, Pfizer, Janssen, Sanofi, IPSEN, MSD, BMS, Novartis, EISAI; received institutional support for research project from Pfizer and BMS. AG has received speakers fees from Amgen. MB received research grants and speaker fees from MSD, Leica and speaker fees from Pfizer. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer SL declared a shared affiliation with the author EOS to the handling editor at the time of review., (Copyright © 2023 Bracarda, Iacovelli, Baldazzi, Zucali, Gernone, Conti, Pappagallo, Brunelli, Bruzzi, Fiorini, Magenta, Diomede, Mereta, D’Aria, Magliano, Liberatori, Cantù, Croce, Eandi, Colombo, Ferrante, Salè, Marinozzi, Lenzi, Remiddi and Remiddi.)

This article describes the main acquisitions of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management presented during the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. In particular, the efficacy of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with resected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence was confirmed through a subgroup analysis. In the metastatic setting, the updated analysis of the CheckMate 9ER study confirmed the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) of the combination of nivolumab plus cabozantinib; of note, this survival advantage was clear in the subgroup of patients at poor IMDC prognosis, but not in favorable IMDC risk group patients. As concern the triplet therapy (i.e. nivolumab+ipilumumab+cabozantinib), the updated analysis of the COSMIC-313 study confirmed a significant PFS advantage in the subgroup of mRCC patients at intermediate IMDC risk, while the lack of benefit in the poor risk group supports the critical role of immunotherapy (but not of VEGFR-TKIs) in this poor prognosis subgroup of patients. Finally, the activity of cabozantinib as second-line therapy after progression to ICI-based combinations was prospectively assessed. This 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium laid the foundations for further knowledge development necessary for an increasingly personalized management of mRCC.

In this article, we describe the main acquisitions of urothelial carcinoma (UC) management reported at the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. A major development of this year was characterized by the confirmation of a disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant nivolumab for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical resection at longer follow-up. In the metastatic setting, the updated analysis of the IMvigor130 study confirmed the failure of the strategy of adding immunotherapy (i.e. atezolizumab) to first-line chemotherapy; analogously atezolizumab monotherapy did not improve overall survival compared to chemotherapy in untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Furthermore, interesting data were presented concerning future treatment options. In particular, immunotherapy (IO) with pembrolizumab showed promising activity in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (KEYNOTE-057). The antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated a relevant activity in platinum (PT)-ineligible mUC patients progressed after prior IO. Certainly, the lack of predictive biomarkers of response to a specific therapy highlights the urgent need for comprehensive characterization of UC for a personalized therapeutic approach that will improve patient outcomes.

Background: Immuno-oncology combinations have achieved survival benefits in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Objective: The ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) was designed to globally collect real-world data on the use of immuno-combinations as first-line therapy for mRCC patients., Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a cytologically and/or histologically confirmed diagnosis of mRCC treated with first-line immuno-combination therapies were retrospectively included from 47 International Institutions from 16 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall clinical benefit (OCB)., Results: A total of 729 patients were included; tumor histology was clear-cell RCC in 86% of cases; 313 patients received dual immuno-oncology (IO + IO) therapy while 416 were treated with IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO + TKI) combinations. In the overall study population, the median OS and PFS were 36.5 and 15.0 months, respectively. The median OS was longer with IO+TKI compared with IO+IO therapy in the 616 patients with intermediate/poor International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk criteria (55.7 vs 29.7 months; p = 0.045). OCB was 84% for IO+TKI and 72% for IO + IO combination (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our study may suggest that immuno-oncology combinations are effective as first-line therapy in the mRCC real-world context, showing outcome differences between IO + IO and IO + TKI combinations in mRCC subpopulations., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05287464., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

The genus Fusarium is well-known to comprise many pathogenic fungi that affect cereal crops worldwide, causing severe damage to agriculture and the economy. In this study, an endophytic fungus designated Fusarium sp. VM-40 was isolated from a healthy specimen of the traditional European medicinal plant Vinca minor . Our morphological characterization and phylogenetic analysis reveal that Fusarium sp. VM-40 is closely related to Fusarium paeoniae, belonging to the F. tricinctum species complex (FTSC), the genomic architecture and secondary metabolite profile of which have not been investigated. Thus, we sequenced the whole genome of Fusarium sp. VM-40 with the new Oxford Nanopore R10.4 flowcells. The assembled genome is 40 Mb in size with a GC content of 47.72%, 15 contigs (≥50,000 bp; N 50~4.3 Mb), and 13,546 protein-coding genes, 691 of which are carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme)-encoding genes. We furthermore predicted a total of 56 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) with antiSMASH, 25 of which showed similarity with known BGCs. In addition, we explored the potential of this fungus to produce secondary metabolites through untargeted metabolomics. Our analyses reveal that this fungus produces structurally diverse secondary metabolites of potential pharmacological relevance (alkaloids, peptides, amides, terpenoids, and quinones). We also employed an epigenetic manipulation method to activate cryptic BGCs, which led to an increased abundance of several known compounds and the identification of several putative new compounds. Taken together, this study provides systematic research on the whole genome sequence, biosynthetic potential, and metabolome of the endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. VM-40.

The recent approval of PARP inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic -castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with BRCA mutations firstly introduced the possibility of proposing a targeted treatment in this disease. However, the availability of this therapeutic option raises a number of questions concerning the management of prostate cancer in everyday clinical practice: the timing and method of detecting BRCA mutations, the therapeutic implications of the detection, and the screening of the members of the family of a prostate cancer patient with a BRCA alteration. These challenging issues led the Italian Society for Uro-Oncology (SIUrO) to organise a Consensus Conference aimed to develop suggestions capable of supporting clinicians managing prostate cancer patients. The present paper described the development of the statements discussed during the consensus, which involved all of the most important Italian scientific societies engaged in the multi-disciplinary and multi-professional management of the disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Alberto Lapini has received fees or honoraria for acting as an advisor to Medac, Bayer, MSD and Janssen, Orazio Caffo has received fees or honoraria for acting as speaker or as an advisor to AAA, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Giario Natale Conti has received fees or honoraria for acting as an advisor to Janssen, Astellas, Bayer, Recordati, MSD, Astrazeneca and Ipsen, Giovanni Luigi Pappagallo has received fees or honoraria for acting as an advisor to AAA, Astellas, Astrazeneca, Janssen, Marzia Del Re has received fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, BioRad, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, MSD, Lilly and Ipsen; and honoraria for acting as an advisor to Astra Zeneca, MSD, Ipsen, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, and Amgen, Francesca Castiglione has received fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, MSD, GSK, and honoraria for acting as an advisor to Astra Zeneca, MSD, and Amgen, Matteo Brunelli has received fees from MSD, Janssen, Genactis, NTP, Oncotech, Roberto Iacovelli has received fees or honoraria for acting as an advisor to Astellas, BMS, EISAI, IPSEN, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi. Consultant for Astellas, EISAI, MSD, Pfizer, Ugo De Giorgi received honoraria for advisory boards or speaker fees for Pfizer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Clovis, GSK, AstraZeneca, institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Roche, Sergio Bracarda has received fees or honoraria for acting as an advisor from or steering committee member from AAA, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. The other authors did not have conflicts of interest to be declared., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) provided significant antitumor activity in various tumors, mainly carrying deleterious mutations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Only few data are available regarding the cardiac and vascular safety profile of this drug class. We carried out a meta-analysis for assessing the incidence and relative risk (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors treated with PARPi-based therapy., Methods: Prospective studies were identified by searching the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Combined odds ratios (ORs), RRs, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods, depending on studies heterogeneity. RevMan software for meta-analysis (v.5.2.3) was used to carry out statistical analyses., Results: Thirty-two studies were selected for the final analysis. The incidence of PARPi-related MACEs of any and high grade was 5.0% and 0.9%, respectively, compared with 3.6% and 0.9% in the control arms, corresponding to a significant increased risk of MACEs of any grade (Peto OR 1.62; P = 0.0009) but not of high grade (P = 0.49). The incidence of hypertension of any grade and high grade was 17.5% and 6.0% with PARPi, respectively, compared with 12.6% and 4.4% in the controls. Treatment with PARPi significantly increased the risk of hypertension of any grade (random-effects, RR = 1.53; P = 0.03) but not of high grade (random-effects, RR = 1.47; P = 0.09) compared with controls. Finally, PARPi-based therapies significantly increased the risk of thromboembolic events of any grade (Peto OR = 1.49, P = 0.004) and not of high grade (Peto OR = 1.31; P = 0.13) compared with controls., Conclusions: PARPi-based therapy is associated with a significantly increased risk of MACEs, hypertension, and thromboembolic events of any grade compared with controls. The lack of a significant increased risk of high-grade events together with the absolute low incidence of these adverse events led not to consider routine cardiovascular monitoring as recommended in asymptomatic patients., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Standard treatment for localized non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is radical or partial nephrectomy. However, after radical surgery, patients with stage II-III have a substantial risk of relapse (around 35%). To date a unique standardized classification for the risk of disease recurrence still lack. Moreover, in the last years great attention has been focused in developing systemic therapies with the aim of improving the disease-free survival (DFS) of high-risk patients, with negative results from adjuvant VEGFR-TKIs. Therefore, there is still a need for developing effective treatments for radically resected RCC patients who are at intermediate/high risk of relapse. Recently, interesting results came from immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, with a significant benefit in terms of disease-free survival from adjuvant pembrolizumab. However, the conflicting results of diverse clinical trials investigating different ICI-based regimens in the adjuvant setting, together with the still immature data on the overall survival advantage of immunotherapy, requires careful considerations. Furthermore, several questions remain unanswered, primarily regarding the selection of patients who could benefit the most from immunotherapy. In this review, we have summarized the main clinical trials investigating adjuvant therapy in RCC, with a particular focus on immunotherapy. Moreover, we have analyzed the crucial issue of patients' stratification according to the risk of disease recurrence, and we have described the possible future prospective and novel agents under evaluation for perioperative and adjuvant therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recently, it was reported that the Bladder EpiCheck test is likely to represent a valid tool in the diagnostic process of patients who have suspected bladder carcinoma, with some controversial management decisions because of the technical limitations of cytology., Methods: Two hundred ninety patients with a diagnosis of nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma who were admitted at the authors' department from March 2019 to December 2019 were treated and followed for 1 year. During follow-up, all patients were evaluated by voided urine cytology, white-light cystoscopy (according to European Association of Urology guidelines), and the Bladder EpiCheck test., Results: The cytologic diagnoses of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and suspicious for HGUC were histologically confirmed in 5 of 20 patients (25%) who had quantitative Bladder EpiCheck scores (EpiScores) from 60 to 69, in 23 of 36 patients (64%) who had EpiScores from 70 to 79, and in 42 of 56 patients (75%) and 57 of 63 patients (90%) who had EpiScores between 80 and 89 and EpiScores >90, respectively. Of 48 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of HGUC or suspicious for HGUC with EpiScores ≥60 and negative histology, 20 (42%) had a recurrence of HGUC, which was cytologically and histologically confirmed, at 6-12 months during follow-up., Conclusions: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study in which patients at high risk for HGUC were stratified using the Bladder EpiCheck EpiScore. The results validate this methylation analysis tool as a useful method for predicting recurrent HGUC during the follow-up of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is a lethal disease for which platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard of care; however, long-term survival is achieved only in a minority of patients. Recently, along with important advances in the comprehension of the biology of this disease, the treatment paradigm of mUC has undergone a rapid expansion with the approval of several immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted agents in both first- and second-line settings. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains the backbone of first-therapy for mUC; nevertheless, for those patients who do not progress after the full course of first-line chemotherapy, maintenance treatment with the anti-PD-L1 avelumab showed to prolong overall survival compared observation alone. Moreover, the disappointing results of chemotherapy in pre-treated patients have led to the investigation and the subsequent approval of the anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab, which showed an unprecedented survival benefit when compared to second-line chemotherapy. Recently, target therapy with the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) enfortumab vedotin, directed against Nectin-4, showed outstanding results in patients treated with both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib and sacituzumab govitecan, an ADC targeting Trop-2, demonstrated encouraging activity in phase II studies and are currently under investigation in randomized phase III trials. ICIs and targeted therapies also demonstrated promising results as first-line treatment of cisplatin-ineligible patients; randomized trials of ICIs alone or in combination with targeted agents are ongoing and may broaden the therapeutic armamentarium for this category of patients. In this review, we describe the current state of art for the treatment of mUC; in addition, we present the latest evidences from the most recent literature and congress presentations. Finally, we illustrate the key ongoing clinical trials, focusing on ICIs and target therapies.

Background: First-line therapies based on immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improved survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Cabozantinib was shown to target kinases involved in immune-escape and to prolong survival in patients pre-treated with tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs). The impact of ICIs combinations in first line on subsequent therapies is still unclear., Methods: This is an open label, multicenter, single arm, phase II study designed to assess activity, safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients progressed after an adjuvant or first line anti-Programmed Death (PD)-1/PD-Ligand (PD-L) 1-based therapy. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety., Results: 31 patients were included in the analysis. After a median (m) follow-up of 11.9 months, mPFS was 8.3 months (90%CI 3.9-17.4) and mOS was 13.8 months (95%CI 7.7-29.0). ORR was 37.9% with an additional 13 patients achieving disease stability. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 47% of patients, including more frequently creatine phosphokinase (CPK) serum level elevation, neutropenia, hyponatremia, diarrhea, hand-food syndrome, oral mucositis and hypertension., Conclusions: The BREAKPOINT trial met its primary endpoint showing that cabozantinib as second line therapy after ICIs was active in mRCC. Safety profile was manageable., Trial Registration Number: NCT03463681 - A Study of CaBozantinib in Patients With Advanced or Unresectable Renal cEll cArcinoma (BREAKPOINT) - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03463681.