Search

Objectives To collect reliable, comparable and publicly available data on hospital use of antibiotics in Europe aggregated at the national level (1997-2002). Methods Consumption data of systemic antibiotics in Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) class J01 were collected and expressed in defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day. Valid data for 2002 were available for 15 countries, and 6 year trends for 10 countries. Comparison with ambulatory care (AC) consumption data was possible in 14 countries. Results In 2002, median national hospital antibiotic consumption in Europe was 2.1 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day in Europe, ranging from 3.9 in Finland and France to 1.3 in Norway and Sweden. Hospital care (HC) consumption as a proportion of total antibiotic consumption ranged from 17.8% to 6.4%. The consumption of hospital-specific antibiotics ranged from 0.43 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day in Greece and 0.08 in Sweden. Six-year trends in consumption were stable, except for rising co-amoxiclav exposure and more rapid market penetration of new antibiotics (e.g. levofloxacin) in some countries. There was a strong, positive correlation between the extent of antibiotic use in AC and in HC (Spearman coefficient 0.745; P = 0.002), both for overall use and for use of five main classes (not macrolides and 'others'). In contrast to AC consumption no substantial seasonal variation in consumption was observed. Conclusions It was cumbersome but feasible to collect ecological data on hospital antibiotic consumption in a set of 15 European countries on a retrospective basis, illustrating substantial cross-national variations in the extent and distribution of exposure to antibiotics in hospital care.

Background Europe is a continent with strong public healthcare systems, but diverging antibiotic policies and resistance patterns. Aims To describe the performance and methodological approach in a retrospective data collection effort (1997–2001), through an international network of surveillance systems, aiming to collect publicly available, comparable and reliable data on antibiotic use in Europe. Methods A central multidisciplinary management team co-ordinated a network of national representatives, liasing with national data providers and bodies responsible for antibiotic policy. The data collected were screened for bias, using a checklist. We focused on detection bias in sample and census data; errors in assigning medicinal product packages to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification (ATC); errors in calculations of defined daily doses (DDD) per package; bias by over-the-counter sales and parallel trade; and bias in ambulatory care (AC)/hospital care (HC) mix. Datasets were corrected after national feedback, and classified as valid; valid but with minor bias; not valid. Results Of the 31 participating countries, 21 countries delivered AC data suitable for cross-national comparison (14 for all 5 years). Of these, 17 countries provided data on a quarterly basis for at least 1 year. For HC, 14 countries were able to deliver valid data (nine for all 5 years). A valid estimate of the total exposure of national populations to human antibiotic consumption could be made in 17 countries. Conclusion In cross-national comparisons of antibiotic consumption in Europe, methodological rigour in correcting for various sources of bias and checking the validity of ATC/DDD assignment is needed.

Intermittent claudication is pain, caused by chronic occlusive arterial disease, that develops in a limb during exercise and is relieved with rest. Buflomedil is a vasoactive agent claimed to have beneficial effects on the microcirculation. It is used chiefly to treat peripheral vascular disease and to a lesser extent for cerebrovascular arterial disease. However, its clinical efficacy for intermittent claudication has not yet been critically examined.To evaluate the available evidence on the efficacy of buflomedil for intermittent claudication.We searched Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Abbott Laboratories, the distributor of buflomedil, was asked to provide reports of controlled clinical trials. Reference lists of retrieved articles were checked, and enquiries sent to authors of known trials, to identify additional trials. Finally, we conducted a Science Citation Index search.Trial reports had to be double-blinded, randomized, and conformed to our PIO-criteria (Patients, Intervention, Outcome) to be considered for inclusion. Patients were required to have proven intermittent claudication (Fontaine stage II); the intervention was to be oral administration of buflomedil compared to placebo; and outcomes had to include pain-free walking distance (PFWD) and maximum walking distance (MWD) analysed by standardized exercise test.Searches of bibliographic databases yielded three eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a meta-analysis referring to nine eligible trials. Two of these nine trials had already been identified; two had been published in journals not referenced in traditional bibliographic indexes; and five were unpublished. Despite multiple requests, only one of the five unpublished trials was provided by the author of the meta-analysis, the other four could not be retrieved. Four of the six eligible trials retrieved were subsequently excluded after quality evaluation. Data on walking distances were extracted from the two remaining trials. Differences in incremental gain between active and placebo groups for PFWD and MWD with their confidence intervals were calculated.Both RCTs showed moderate improvements in PFWD for patients on buflomedil. In one trial this improvement (75 m, 95% CI 37-114) was statistically significant, but in the other, with a wholly diabetic population, it was non-significant (81m, 95% CI -9-170) compared to placebo. For both RCTs the gains in MWD were statistically significant, but with wide confidence intervals (81 m, 95% CI 30-131; and 171 m, 95% CI 27-316 respectively). Pooling of the data was not attempted.There is little evidence available to evaluate the efficacy of buflomedil for intermittent claudication. Most available trials are of poor quality and were excluded. The two trials included showed moderately positive results but these are undermined by publication bias since we know of another four unpublished, irretrievable, and inconclusive studies. There is a lack evidence for the efficacy of buflomedil in intermittent claudication.