Search

Objective: To examine differences in surgical practices between salaried and fee-for-service (FFS) surgeons for two common degenerative spine conditions. Surgeons may offer different treatments for similar conditions on the basis of their compensation mechanism. Methods: The study assessed the practices of 63 spine surgeons across eight Canadian provinces (39 FFS surgeons and 24 salaried) who performed surgery for two lumbar conditions: stable spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. The study included a multicenter, ambispective review of consecutive spine surgery patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry between October 2012 and July 2018. The primary outcome was the difference in type of procedures performed between the two groups. Secondary study variables included surgical characteristics, baseline patient factors, and patient-reported outcome. Results: For stable spinal stenosis (n = 2234), salaried surgeons performed statistically fewer uninstrumented fusion (p < 0.05) than FFS surgeons. For degenerative spondylolisthesis (n = 1292), salaried surgeons performed significantly more instrumentation plus interbody fusions (p < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in patient-reported outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: Surgeon compensation was associated with different approaches to stable lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Salaried surgeons chose a more conservative approach to spinal stenosis and a more aggressive approach to degenerative spondylolisthesis, which highlights that remuneration is likely a minor determinant in the differences in practice of spinal surgery in Canada. Further research is needed to further elucidate which variables, other than patient demographics and financial incentives, influence surgical decision-making.

Background A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), performed by the authors, comparing early surgical microdiscectomy with 6 months of nonoperative care for chronic lumbar radiculopathy showed that early surgery resulted in improved outcomes. However, estimates of the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), which is often expressed as the cost of gaining one quality-adjusted life year (QALY), of microdiscectomy versus nonsurgical management have varied. Radiculopathy lasting more than 4 months is less likely to improve without surgical intervention and may have a more favorable ICUR than previously reported for acute radiculopathy. Question/purpose In the setting of chronic radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation, defined as symptoms and/or signs of 4 to 12 months duration, is surgical management more cost-effective than 6 months of nonoperative care from the third-party payer perspective based on a willingness to pay of less than CAD 50,000/QALY? Methods A decision analysis model served as the vehicle for the cost-utility analysis. A decision tree was parameterized using data from our single-center RCT that was augmented with institutional microcost data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. Bottom-up case costing methodology generates more accurate cost estimates, although institutional costs are known to vary. There were no major surgical cost drivers such as implants or bone graft substitutes, and therefore, the jurisdictional variance would be minimal for tertiary care centers. QALYs derived from the EuroQoL-5D were the health outcome and were derived exclusively from the RCT data, given the paucity of studies evaluating the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy lasting 4 to 12 months. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the ICUR and a threshold of willingness to pay CAD 50,000 (USD 41,220) per QALY in the base case. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for the uncertainties within the estimate of cost utility, using both a probabilistic sensitivity analysis and two one-way sensitivity analyses with varying crossover rates after the 6-month nonsurgical treatment had concluded. Results Early surgical treatment of patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy (defined as symptoms of 4 to 12 months duration) was cost-effective, in that the cost of one QALY was lower than the CAD 50,000 threshold (note: the purchasing power parity conversion factor between the Canadian dollar (CAD) and the US dollar (USD) for 2019 was 1 USD = 1.213 CAD; therefore, our threshold was USD 41,220). Patients in the early surgical treatment group had higher expected costs (CAD 4118 [95% CI 3429 to 4867]) than those with nonsurgical treatment (CAD 2377 [95% CI 1622 to 3518]), but they had better expected health outcomes (1.48 QALYs [95% CI 1.39 to 1.57] versus 1.30 [95% CI 1.22 to 1.37]). The ICUR was CAD 5822 per QALY gained (95% CI 3029 to 30,461). The 2-year probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the likelihood that early surgical treatment was cost-effective was 0.99 at the willingness-to-pay threshold, as did the one-way sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Early surgery is cost-effective compared with nonoperative care in patients who have had chronic sciatica for 4 to 12 months. Decision-makers should ensure adequate funding to allow timely access to surgical care given that it is highly likely that early surgical intervention is potentially cost-effective in single-payer systems. Future work should focus on both the clinical effectiveness of the treatment of chronic radiculopathy and the costs of these treatments from a societal perspective to account for occupational absences and lost patient productivity. Parallel cost-utility analyses are critical so that appropriate decisions about resource allocation can be made. Level of evidence Level III, economic and decision analysis.

OBJECTIVE Time to return to work (RTW) after elective lumbar spine surgery is variable and dependent on many factors including patient, work-related, and surgical factors. The primary objective of this study was to describe the time and rate of RTW after elective lumbar spine surgery. Secondary objectives were to determine predictors of early RTW (< 90 days) and no RTW in this population. METHODS A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the multicenter Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) surgical registry was performed to identify patients who were employed and underwent elective 1- or 2-level discectomy, laminectomy, and/or fusion procedures between January 2015 and December 2019. The percentage of patients who returned to work and the time to RTW postoperatively were calculated. Predictors of early RTW and not returning to work were determined using a multivariable Cox regression model and a multivariable logistic regression model, respectively. RESULTS Of the 1805 employed patients included in this analysis, 71% returned to work at a median of 61 days. The median RTW after a discectomy, laminectomy, or fusion procedure was 51, 46, and 90 days, respectively. Predictors of early RTW included male gender, higher education level (high school or above), higher preoperative Physical Component Summary score, working preoperatively, a nonfusion procedure, and surgery in a western Canadian province (p < 0.05). Patients who were working preoperatively were twice as likely to RTW within 90 days (HR 1.984, 95% CI 1.680–2.344, p < 0.001) than those who were employed but not working. Predictors of not returning to work included symptoms lasting more than 2 years, an increased number of comorbidities, an education level below high school, and an active workers’ compensation claim (p < 0.05). There were fourfold odds of not returning to work for patients who had not been working preoperatively (OR 4.076, 95% CI 3.087–5.383, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In the Canadian population, 71% of a preoperatively employed segment returned to work after 1- or 2-level lumbar spine surgery. Most patients who undergo a nonfusion procedure RTW after 6 to 8 weeks, whereas patients undergoing a fusion procedure RTW at 12 weeks. Working preoperatively significantly increased the likelihood of early RTW.

Controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS). Not all DS patients are the same, and the degree to which inherent stability may dictate treatment is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the variability in surgical approach relative to surgeon classified stability. The secondary objective was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across different surgical techniques and grades of stability. Patients prospectively enrolled from eleven tertiary care institutions and followed from 2015 to 2019. The surgical technique was at the surgeon’s discretion. Surgeons were asked to grade the degree of instability based on the degenerative spondylolisthesis instability classification system (DSIC). DSIC categorizes three different types (I-stable, II-potentially unstable, and III-unstable). One-year changes in PROs were compared between each group. Multivariable regression was used to identify any characteristics that explained variability in treatment. There were 323 patients enrolled in this study. Surgeons’ stability classification versus procedure [decompression alone (D)/decompression and posterolateral fusion (D-PL)/and decompression with posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (D-PLIF/TLIF)] were as follows: type I (n = 91): D-41%/D-PL-13%/D-PLIF/TLIF-46%; type II (n = 175): D-23%/D-PL-17%/D-PLIF/TLIF-60%; and type III (n = 57):(D-0%/D-PL-14%/D-PLIF/TLIF-86%). Type I patients undergoing D-PL had some improvements in EQ-5D and NRS versus those undergoing D-PLIF/TLIF but otherwise there were no other significant differences between groups. Regression analysis demonstrated advanced age (OR = 1.06, CI 1.02–10.12) and type I (OR = 2.61, CI 1.17–5.81) were associated with receiving decompression surgery alone. There exists considerable variation in surgical management of DS in Canada. Given similar PROs in two of the three groups, there is potential to tailor surgical intervention and improve resource utilization.

OBJECTIVE Patients undergoing spine surgery generally have high expectations for improvement postoperatively. Little is known about how these expectations are affected by the diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to examine whether preoperative expectations differ based on diagnostic pathoanatomical patterns in elective spine surgery patients. METHODS Patients with common degenerative cervical/lumbar pathology (lumbar/cervical stenosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis, and cervical/lumbar disc herniation) who had given their consent for surgery were analyzed using the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). Patients reported the changes they expected to experience postoperatively in relation to 7 separate items using a modified version of the North American Spine Society spine questionnaire. Patients were also asked about the most important item that would make them consider the surgery a success. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables were also collected. RESULTS There were 3868 eligible patients identified within the network for analysis. Patients with lumbar disc herniation had higher expectations for relief of leg pain compared with stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis cohorts within the univariate analysis. Cervical stenosis (myelopathy) patients were more likely to rank general physical capacity as their most important expectation from spine surgery. The multinomial regression analysis showed that cervical myelopathy patients have lower expectations for relief of arm or neck pain from surgery (OR 0.54, 0.34–0.88; p < 0.05). Patient factors, including age, symptoms (pain, disability, depression), work status, and lifestyle factors, were significantly associated with expectation, whereas the diagnoses were not. CONCLUSIONS Patients with degenerative spinal conditions consenting for spine surgery have high expectations for improvement in all realms of their daily lives. With the exception of patients with cervical myelopathy, patient symptoms rather than diagnoses had a more substantial impact on the dimensions in which patients expected to improve or their most important expected change. Determination of patient expectation should be individualized and not biased by pathoanatomical diagnosis.

Study Design Retrospective analysis was performed of a multi-center Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) surgical database. Objective To determine the rate and time to return to work (RTW) based on workload intensity after elective degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Methods Patients working pre-operatively, aged greater than 18, who underwent a primary one- or two-level elective lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions between January 2015 and October 2020 were evaluated. The percentage of patients who returned to work at 1 year and the time to RTW post-operatively were analyzed based on workload intensity. Results Of the 1290 patients included in the analysis, the overall rate of RTW was 82% at 1 year. Based on workload there was no significant difference in time to RTW after a fusion procedure, with median time to RTW being 10 weeks. For non-fusion procedure, the sedentary group had a statistically significantly quicker time to RTW than the light-moderate ( P < .005) and heavy-very heavy (Conclusions The rate of RTW ranged between 84% for patients with sedentary work to 77% for patient with a heavy-very heavy workload. Median time to resumption of work was about 10 weeks following a fusion regardless of work intensity. There was more variability following non-fusion surgeries such as laminectomy and discectomy reflecting the patient’s job demands.

Surgical case costing is critical for health leaders to make decisions about resource utilization. Synoptic reporting offers the potential for surgeons to capture these costs and work with other leaders to make evidence-based decisions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgeons documented intra-operative cost drivers as part of their operative report. This article outlines a synoptic reporting system at a quaternary spine care centre. Data were captured from 2015 to 2020. Surgeon rates of documentation for specific devices, bone graft, and surgical adjuncts were evaluated. It is hoped that the results of this survey will help to guide programs to capture costs in other settings.

BACKGROUND Perioperative adverse events (AEs) lead to patient disappointment and greater costs. There is a paucity of data on how AEs affect long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine perioperative AEs and their impact on outcome after lumbar spine surgery. METHODS A total of 3556 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network were analyzed. AEs were defined using the validated Spine AdVerse Events Severity system. Outcomes at 3, 12, and 24 mo postoperatively included the Owestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scales, visual analog scale (VAS) leg and back, EuroQol-5D (EQ5D), and satisfaction. RESULTS AEs occurred in 767 (21.6%) patients, and 85 (2.4%) patients suffered major AEs. Patients with major AEs had worse ODI scores and did not reach minimum clinically important differences at 2 yr (no AE: 25.7 ± 19.2, major: 36.4 ± 19.1, P

Describe the validation of a surgical objective structured clinical examination (S-OSCE) for the purpose of competency assessment based on the Royal College of Canada's Can-MEDS framework.A surgical OSCE was developed to evaluate the management of common orthopedic surgical problems. The scores derived from this S-OSCE were compared to Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE), a validated entrustability assessment, to establish convergent validity. The S-OSCE scores were compared to Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) scores to evaluate divergent validity. Resident evaluations of the clinical encounter with a standardized patient and the operative procedure were scored on a 10-point Likert scale for fidelity.A tertiary level academic teaching hospital.21 postgraduate year 2 to 5 trainees of a 5-year Canadian orthopedic residency program creating 160 operative case performances for review.There were 5 S-OSCE days, over a 4-year period (2016-2019) encompassing a variety of surgical procedures. Performance on the S-OSCE correlated strongly with the O-SCORE (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.88), and a linear regression analysis correlated moderately with year of training (R² = 0.5345). The Pearson correlation coefficient between the S-OSCE and OITE scores was 0.57. There was a significant increase in the average OITE score after the introduction of the surgical OSCE. Resident fidelity ratings were available from 16 residents encompassing 8 different surgical cases. The average score for the overall simulation (8.0±1.6) was significantly higher than the cadaveric surgical simulation (6.5 ± 0.8) (p0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The S-OSCE scores correlate strongly with an established form of assessment demonstrating convergent validity. The correlation between the S-OSCE and OITE scores was less, demonstrating divergent validity. Although residents rank the overall simulation highly, the fidelity of the cadaveric simulation may need improvement. Administration of a surgical OSCE can be used to evaluate preoperative and intraoperative decision making and complement other forms of assessment.

Retrospective cohort study To characterize the learning curve of a spine surgeon during the first 2 years of independent practice by comparing to an experienced colleague. To stratify learning curves based on procedure to evaluate the effect of experience on surgical complexity. The learning curve for spine surgery is difficult to quantify, but is useful information for hospital administrators/surgical programs/new graduates, so appropriate expectations and accommodations are considered. Data from a retrospective cohort (2014–2016) were analyzed at a quaternary academic institution servicing a geographically-isolated, mostly rural area. Procedures included anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical decompression and stabilization, single and 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion, lumbar discectomy, and laminectomy. Data related to patient demographics, after-hours surgery, and revision surgery were collected. Operative time was the primary outcome measure, with secondary measures including cerebrospinal fluid leak and early re-operation. Time periods were stratified into 6 month quarters (quarter [Q] 1–Q4), with STATA software used for statistical analysis. There were 626 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The senior surgeon had similar operative times throughout the study. The new surgeon demonstrated a decrease in operative time from Q1 to Q4 (158 minutes–119 minutes, P .05), nor reoperation (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.7–1.9]; P > .05) between surgeons. A significant learning curve exists starting spine practice and likely extends beyond the first 2 years for elective operations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lumbar degenerative stenosis is one of the most common spine pathologies for which surgical intervention is indicated. There is some evidence that a prolonged duration of neurological compression could lead to a failure of surgery to alleviate symptoms. PURPOSE Determination of whether longer symptom duration was associated with worse postoperative disability outcomes after decompressive surgery for lumbar degenerative stenosis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING The Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) prospective database includes pre- and postoperative data from 18 tertiary care hospitals. PATIENT SAMPLE The CSORN database was queried for all cases of degenerative lumbar stenosis receiving surgical decompression for neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy. Patients with tumor, infection, fracture, or previous surgery were excluded. Patients were divided into groups based on symptom duration ( 2 years). OUTCOME MEASURES Change between preoperative and 12-month postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was compared between symptom duration groups. Secondary outcomes included SF12 physical component score (PCS), and numeric rating scales for leg and back pain. Outcomes were also assessed at 3 months and 24 months postoperatively. METHODS Change in ODI, and secondary outcome measures, were compared between different symptom duration groups. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors interacting with symptom duration to predict change in ODI. RESULTS Four hundred and seventy-eight cases of lumbar stenosis with 12-month postoperative data were identified. Longer symptom duration correlated with less improvement in ODI (p 1 year of symptoms were less likely to achieve a Minimal Clinically Significant Difference in ODI (54.4% vs. 66.1%; p=.03) and were more likely to experience no improvement or worse disability, postoperatively (22.1% vs. 11.3%; p=.008). Similar results were found at 3- and 24-month timepoints. Smaller postoperative improvements in SF12 PCS and leg pain scales were also correlated with longer symptom duration (p CONCLUSIONS Multicenter registry data provides important real-world evidence to guide consent, surgical planning, and health resource management. Longer symptom duration was found to correlate with less improvement in pain and disability after lumbar stenosis surgery suggesting that these patients may benefit from earlier treatment.

Surgeons may not have a thorough knowledge about the costs of devices or surgical equipment. The main reason for this in many systems is price insensitivity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether spine surgical procedural expenses change once physicians are aware of the costs for surgical implants and the total associated costs with the procedure. A thorough bottom up case costing methodology was used to capture the costs of admission for three comparable spine surgical procedures at a large tertiary care center. Costs were collected for an initial 5-month period where surgeons were not aware of costs, followed by another 5-month period with detailed cost information. Instrumental costs, procedural costs and costs of admission were captured as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL) measures at 3 months. Statistical analysis was undertaken with STATA software. Costs decreased by $478 for instrumentation once actual prices were known (p = 0.069). Only ACDF procedures demonstrated statistically significant instrumental cost savings of $754 (p = 0.009). Total procedural costs were also less ($297, p = 0.194) but the total overall costs of admission increased ($401, p = 0.228). There were no differences in VAS, EQ-5D, or SF-12 scores. Although costs decrease for implants in surgery when prices are known, this appears to have little or no effect on overall costs of care. Length of stay and operating room time have greater effects on global costs. Future efforts to encourage efficient cost savings should focus on practice patterns/pathways for similar conditions rather than limiting the use of certain implants.

There is worldwide geographic variation in the epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). The aim of this study was to determine whether environmental barriers, health status, and quality-of-life outcomes differ between patients with tSCI living in rural or urban settings, and whether patients move from rural to urban settings after tSCI. A cohort review of the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) was undertaken from 2004 to 2012 for one province in Canada. Rural/urban setting was determined using postal codes. Outcomes data at 1 year in the community included the Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF36v2™), Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors-Short Form (CHIEF-SF), Functional Independent Measure® Instrument, and SCI Health Questionnaire. Statistical methodologies used were t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact or χ2 test. In the analysis, 338 RHSCIR participants were included; 65 lived in a rural setting and 273 in an urban setting. Of the original patients residing in a rural area at discharge,10 moved to an urban area by 1 year. Those who moved from a rural to urban area reported a lower SF-36v2™ Mental Component Score (MCS; p = 0.04) and a higher incidence of depression at 1 year (p = 0.04). Urban patients also reported a higher incidence of depression (p = 0.02) and a lower CHIEF-SF total score (p = 0.01) indicating fewer environmental barriers. No significant differences were found in other outcomes. Results suggest that although the patient outcomes are similar, some patients move from rural to urban settings after tSCI. Future efforts should target screening mental health problems early, especially in urban settings.

It is controversial whether the surgical restoration of sagittal balance and spinopelvic angulation in a single level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis results in clinical improvements. The purpose of this study to systematically review the available literature to determine whether the surgical correction of malalignment in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis correlates with improvements in patient-reported clinical outcomes. Literature searches were performed via Ovid Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science using search terms "lumbar," "degenerative/spondylolisthesis" and "surgery/surgical/surgeries/fusion". This resulted in 844 articles and after reviewing the abstracts and full-texts, 13 articles were included for summary and final analysis. There were two Level II articles, four Level III articles and five Level IV articles. Most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were Oswestery disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Four articles were included for the final statistical analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the patient groups who achieved successful surgical correction of malalignment and those who did not for either ODI (mean difference -0.94, CI -8.89-7.00) or VAS (mean difference 1.57, CI -3.16-6.30). Two studies assessed the efficacy of manual reduction of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and their clinical outcomes after the operation, and there was no statistically significant improvement. Overall, the restoration of focal lumbar lordosis and restoration of sagittal balance for single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis does not seem to yield clinical improvements but well-powered studies on this specific topic is lacking in the current literature. Future well-powered studies are needed for a more definitive conclusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Spine surgeries utilize significant hospital resources, with length of stay (LOS) being a major cost driver. Predicting inpatient hospitalization is essential for the operational success of a hospital. Previous studies identifying pertinent factors that impact LOS in spine surgery are limited. PURPOSE To identify pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors associated with LOS in patients undergoing spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective review of spine surgery patients at a Canadian tertiary academic teaching hospital. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 415 spine surgery patients. OUTCOME MEASURES LOS (calculated from the date of surgery to the date of discharge, with no accommodation for partial days). METHODS Institutional research ethics board (IRB) approval was obtained. Patients undergoing surgery by two orthopedic spine surgeons between October 2014 to October 2016 were identified using billing codes. Chart data were extracted on 16 surgical and nonsurgical factors by two independent reviewers. Factors collected included age, sex, BMI, ASA class, insurance claim, transfusion, preop medication use (antidepressant, neuroleptic and narcotic), surgical procedure (sub-grouped into 10 categories: single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), 2-level TLIF, discectomy, laminectomy, posterior c-spine, minimally-invasive stabilization, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), major deformity, and other (hematoma, removal of hardware, incision and drainage), Charlson Comorbidity Index, preop hemoglobin, surgical time, initial versus revision surgery, intraop analgesic dose, and LOS. Multiple quasi-poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with LOS. RESULTS There were 378 patients with full data included in the final analysis. Average age of the cohort was 52 years (16.3 sd, range 16-88) and 51% were female. Thirty percent (n=123) of the procedures were 1-level TLIF, while 6% (n=25) were 2-level TLIF. Other prominent procedures included discectomy (18%), laminectomy (15%) and posterior c-spine (7%). The average LOS for the entire cohort was 5.9 ±11.0 days and was right skewed: 58 subjects (14%) had 0 days in hospital and 59 subjects (14%) stayed longer than 1 week. A poisson model was built to predict LOS with surgical procedure while controlling for the other study variables. Compared to patients undergoing one- or two-level laminectomy, those that had single level or two-level discectomy stayed less than half as long (IRR=0.44, 95% CI: [0.24, 0.80]). Posterior c-spine patients (IRR=4.92, 95% CI: [2.92, 8.28]), major deformities (IRR=3.07, 95% CI: [1.85, 5.10]), ACDFs (IRR=2.24, 95% CI: [1.21, 4.15]), and 1-level TLIFs (IRR=1.50, 95%CI: [1.03, 2.16]) all had significantly longer hospital stays. Amongst the other study variables, ASA class 4 patients had a significantly longer stay (IRR=4.3), and patients that received a transfusion also stayed longer (IRR=2.7). All other factors evaluated were not found to be independently predictive of LOS. CONCLUSIONS The LOS within this cohort is strongly correlated with the procedure performed. Medical comorbidities and other factors did not significantly impact LOS except in very ill patients. Future pathway improvement should focus on procedure-specific, post-operative rehabilitation protocols and appropriate pre-operative optimization of severe medical illness. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Study Design. Systematic literature review and consensus expert opinion. Objective. To provide recommendations on reconstructive constructs for large tumor resections of the spinal column. Four questions were studied: (1) What are the best reconstructive options for single versus multilevel resections? (2) Should short segment fixation be considered in primary tumor reconstruction? (3) How should reconstructive techniques differ at various regions of the spine? (4) Does planned postoperative radiation change the fusion strategy? Summary of Background Data. Primary spinal tumors requiring en bloc resection are rare. Most studies focus on disease-free survival and local recurrence rates. Few studies focus on reconstructive options and outcomes with respect to fusion rates and need for revision. Methods. A literature search was performed from January 1990 to December 2013. Data were combined and construct survivorship summarized. A survey was administered to international spine tumor surgeons, evaluating reconstructive preferences. Results. The search yielded 381 articles, 12 included in the final analysis. Revision rates for anterior reconstruction were similar for autogenous strut grafts (10%), cages (7.7%), and allograft strut grafts (8.3%). There were two reports of revision from short to long segment constructs and three reports of broken pedicle screws, one requiring revision. Expert survey results revealed that most surgeons preferred cages packed with morcelized allograft and autograft (75%) for anterior reconstruction of single-level vertebrectomies, and strut bone grafting at the cervicothoracic junction (65%) and when more than one vertebrae was resected in the mid-thoracic spine (75%). Surgeons may alter their fusion technique if postoperative radiation is planned. Conclusion. Posterior reconstruction with at least two vertebral levels above and below is recommended. Cages should be used for single-level defects and structural bone graft alone, or in combination with a cage, should be used when spanning a defect greater than two vertebral bodies. Planned postoperative radiation may affect fusion strategy. Conclusion. Level of Evidence: N/A

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine if there is a significant difference in surgical site infection (SSI) when comparing the Wiltse and midline approaches for posterior instrumented interbody fusions of the lumbar spine and, secondarily, to evaluate if the reoperation rates and specific causes for reoperation were similar for both approaches. METHODS A total of 358 patients who underwent 1- or 2-level posterior instrumented interbody fusions for degenerative lumbar spinal pathology through either a midline or Wiltse approach were prospectively followed between March 2005 and January 2011 at a single tertiary care facility. A retrospective analysis was performed primarily to evaluate the incidence of SSI and the incidence and causes for reoperation. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative complications, blood loss, and length of stay. A matched analysis was performed using the Fisher's exact test and a logistic regression model. The matched analysis controlled for age, sex, comorbidities, number of index levels addressed surgically, number of levels fused, and the use of bone grafting. RESULTS All patients returned for follow-up at 1 year, and adverse events were followed for 2 years. The rate of SSI was greater in the midline group (8 of 103 patients; 7.8%) versus the Wiltse group (1 of 103 patients; 1.0%) (p = 0.018). Fewer additional surgical procedures were performed in the Wiltse group (p = 0.025; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23–0.95). Proximal adjacent segment failure requiring reoperation occurred more frequently in the midline group (15 of 103 patients; 14.6%) versus the Wiltse group (6 of 103 patients; 5.8%) (p = 0.048). Blood loss was significantly lower in the Wiltse group (436 ml) versus the midline group (703 ml); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in intraoperative complications or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS The patients who underwent the Wiltse approach had a decreased risk of wound breakdown and infection, less blood loss, and fewer reoperations than the midline patients. The risk of adjacent segment failure in short posterior constructs is lower with a Wiltse approach.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) has traditionally been indicated for patients with neurogenic claudication and radicular pain. Surgery improves patients’ disability and lower extremity symptoms, but little is known about the impact on back pain. PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate changes in back pain after surgery and identify prognostic factors influencing these changes in surgically treated DLS. METHODS Consecutive patients with DLS surgically treated were prospectively enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) registry. Patients had demographic data, clinical information, disability (ODI), and back pain (NRS Back Pain) scores collected prospectively at baseline, 3-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Results were compared to baseline using simple summary statistics and factors associated with improved back pain were assessed with multivariate regression (significance was p RESULTS A total of 557 patients were identified; all had reached 3-month follow-up; 376 (67.5%) had reached 12-month follow-up; and 141 (25.3%) had reached 24-month follow-up. Mean age at baseline was 66.2 (+/−9.5), and 58.5% were female. Back pain improved significantly at 3 months, and was maintained at 12, and 24-month follow-up compared to baseline (p CONCLUSIONS Back pain improved significantly during follow up for patients treated surgically for DLS. This research demonstrates that for patients undergoing surgery for DLS, the majority will have improved back pain at 1-year follow-up. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The importance of sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters are recognized in the management and outcomes of adult spinal deformity and isthmic spondylolisthesis, but less is known regarding their role in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of baseline sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on pain, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients presenting with DLS. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of baseline sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on pain, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients presenting with DLS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Prospective, multi-center study from the Canadian Spine Outcome and Research Network (CSORN). PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with DLS were enrolled in a prospective, multi-center study between 2015 and 2017. Inclusion into this study required DLS at 1 or 2 levels and symptoms of neurogenic claudication or radicular pain with our without back pain. Patients were excluded if they had previous lumbar spine surgery or the presence of another condition which significantly affected function OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-rated outcome measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-12 Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and Mental Component Summary score (MCS), EQ-5D. Pelvic parameter measurements included: sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lurdosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1 spino-pelvic inclination (T1 SPI), and T9 spino-pelvic inclination (T9 SPI). METHODS Baseline patient demographics, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, and sagittal alignment were analyzed for possible correlation to HRQOL using Pearson correlations. RESULTS A total of 154 patients were analyzed (mean age: 65.8, BMI: 29.1) with grade I (72%) or II (28%) DLS, of which 95 were females. Primary symptoms were related to neurogenic claudication (80%), radiculopathy (15.3%) or back pain (4.7%). On average, symptom duration was greater than 2 years in 71% of patients. Patients had moderate to severe symptoms and disability (mean NRS back: 7.2, NRS leg: 7.3, ODI: 45.6, PCS-12: 33.2, MCS-12: 49.6, EQ-5D: 0.54). Baseline measurements of radiographic alignment included sacral slope (SS=34.9±16.7°), pelvic tilt (PT=24.8±9.5°), pelvic incidence (PI=57.4±13.8°), sagittal vertical axis (SVA=35.8±40.8mm), lumbar lordosis (LL=45.7±13.6°), thoracic kyphosis (TK=36.8±13.0°), T9-spinopelvic inclination (T9SPI=9.62±4.0°), and T1-spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI=4.43±10.4°). There were 54% of patients who had an insufficient lumbar lordosis based on the relationship between PI and LL (LL CONCLUSIONS Patients with DLS have global sagittal misalignment compared to published normative controls, highlighted by less lumbar lordosis, a PI to LL mismatch, and increased PT. Spinopelvic alignment was not associated with patient outcomes, although positive sagittal balance may also be influenced by spinal stenosis. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

The purpose of this study was to systematically search, critically appraise and summarize published randomized control trials (RCT) and non-RCT examining the effect of drains and dressings on wound healing rates and complications in posterior spine surgery. The use of post-operative drains and the type of post-operative dressing is at the discretion of the treating surgeon with no available clinical guidelines. Drains will theoretically decrease incidence of post-operative hematoma and therefore, potentially decrease the risk of neurologic compromise when the neural elements have been exposed. Occlusive dressings have more recently been advocated, potentially maintaining a sterile barrier for longer time periods post-operatively. A systematic review of databases from 1969–2013 was undertaken. All papers examining drains in spine surgery and dressings in primary healing of surgical wounds were included. Revman (version 5.2; The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used to test for overall treatment effect, clinical heterogeneity and risk of bias. Of the papers identified, 1348 examined post-operative drains in spine surgery and 979 wound dressings for primary wound healing of all surgical wounds. Seven studies were included for analysis for post-operative drains and 10 studies were analyzed for primary wound healing. The use of a post-operative drain did not influence healing rates and had no effect secondarily on infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–2.30). We were not able to establish whether surgical drains prevent hematomas causing neurologic compromise. There was a slight advantage to using occlusive dressings versus non-occlusive dressings in wound healing (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.44–3.02). Incisional vacuum dressings as both an occlusive barrier and superficial drainage system have shown promise for wounds at risk of dehiscence. There is a relatively high risk of bias in the methodology of many of the studies reviewed. We recommend favoring of occlusive dressings based on heterogeneous and potentially biased evidence. Drain use does not affect wound healing based on similar evidence. Incisional vacuum dressings have shown promise in managing potentially vulnerable wounds.

STUDY DESIGN: Immunohistochemical and behavioral study using a rat model of acute cauda equina syndrome (CES). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of duration of extradural cauda equina compression (CEC) on bladder, sensory, and motor functions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cauda equina syndrome is a devastating injury treated with surgical decompression. Controversy exists regarding the optimal timing of surgery. Animal models of CES have focused on motor recovery but have not evaluated pain behavior or bladder function. METHODS: A 4-mm balloon-tipped Fogarty catheter was inserted between the fifth and sixth lumbar lamina into the dorsal epidural space and inflated to compress the nerve roots at the L5 level. Maximal inflation was maintained at a constant balloon pressure of 304 Kpa for 1 or 4 hours. The catheter was inserted but not inflated in sham animals. During a 4-week period, pain behavior, bladder function, and locomotor function were assessed. Postmortem bladders and the lesion site were collected for analysis. RESULTS: Mechanical allodynia was 2-fold greater in 1-hour CEC rats than 4-hour CEC (P=0.002) and sham-operated (P=0.001) rats at 4 weeks after injury. Hind limb locomotor function was not different between groups at 4 weeks after injury. Both the 1-hour and 4-hour CEC group rats retained greater volumes of urine than the sham-operated rats throughout the 4-week period (P

Adverse events (AEs) in thoracic and lumbar spine fractures are common, but little is known about the type of AEs that are specific to this population. Furthermore, very little is known about the incidence and clinical impact of these AEs on patients in the presence of traumatic spinal cord injury and whether they are treated operatively or nonoperatively.The purpose of this study was to determine primarily the incidence of AEs in patients with thoracic or lumbar spine fractures treated both operatively and nonoperatively and their impact on length of stay (LOS) and secondarily the difference in the incidence of AEs in both neurologically intact and compromised patients.This is an ambispective cohort study at a quaternary referral center.Patients admitted at our institution with thoracic or lumbar fractures from January 2009 to December 2013 were identified. Patients with full Spine Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) data were included.Number and type of AEs collected from SAVES were assessed. Impact of AE on acute LOS was also determined.Data on intraoperative, preoperative, and postoperative AEs were prospectively collected using the SAVES data collection. Logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of experiencing at least one AE based on the patient characteristics. The impact of the total number of AEs experienced by a patient and that of each of the most common AEs on LOS was determined using Poisson regression.Three hundred and ninety patients were included in the final analysis. Two hundred and seventy-six patients (70.8%) were treated operatively. One hundred and forty patients (36%) experienced neurologic deficit as a result of their initial injury. Adverse events occurred 56% of the time in the operatively treated patients and only 13% of the time in the nonoperative group. The presence of neurologic deficit increased the risk of AEs especially in high thoracic (T1-T6) trauma increasing the odds of having an AE by 12.1 (p.0001). The most common AEs were urinary tract infections (19.7%), neuropathic pain (12.3%), pneumonias (11.8%), delirium (10.5%), and ileus (6.2%). Length of hospital stay increased significantly with pneumonia (p.0001) and delirium (p=.0001).The presence of neurologic injury and the need for operative fixation of thoracic or lumbar injuries lead to a greater risk of AEs. Only pneumonia and delirium consistently increase LOS.

Background Context Adverse events (AEs) in thoracic and lumbar spine fractures are common but little is known about the type of AEs that are specific to this population. Further, very little is known about the incidence and clinical impact of these AEs on patients in the presence of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and whether they are treated operatively or nonoperatively. Purpose To determine the incidence of AEs in patients with thoracic or lumbar spine fractures treated both operatively and nonoperatively and determine their impact on length of stay (LOS). Secondly, determine the difference in incidence of AEs in both neurologically intact and compromised patients. Study Design/Setting Ambispective cohort study at a quaternary referral center. Patient Sample Patients admitted at our institution with thoracic or lumbar fractures from January 2009 to December 2013 were identified. Patients with full spine adverse events severity system data (SAVES) were included. Outcome Measures Number and type of AEs collected from SAVES were assessed. Impact of AE on acute LOS was also determined. Materials and Methods No funding was received or used in this study. Data on intra-, pre-, and postoperative AEs were prospectively collected using the SAVES data collection. Logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of experiencing at least one AE based on patient characteristics. The impact of the total number of AEs experienced by a patient and that of each of the most common AEs on LOS was determined using Poisson regression. Results A total of 390 patients were included in final analysis. Total, 276 patients (70.8%) were treated operatively. Overall 140 patients (36%) experienced neurological deficit as a result of their initial injury. AEs occurred in operatively treated patients 56% of the time and only 13% of the time in the nonoperative group. The presence of neurological deficit increased the risk of AEs especially in high thoracic (T1–T6) trauma increasing the odds of having an adverse event by 12.1 ( p Conclusions The presence of neurological injury and the need for operative fixation of thoracic or lumbar injuries leads to a greater risk of adverse events. Only pneumonia and delirium consistently increase LOS.

© 2015 Glennie et al. Background: Glenoid component survival is critical to good long-term outcomes in total shoulder arthroplasty. Optimizing the fixation environment is paramount. The purpose of this study was to compare two glenoid cementing techniques for fixation in total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Sixteen cadaveric specimens were randomized to receive peg-only cementation (CPEG) or full back-side cementation (CBACK). Physiological cyclic loading was performed and implant displacement was recorded using an optical tracking system. The cement mantle was examined with micro-computed tomography before and after cyclic loading. Results: Significantly greater implant displacement away from the inferior portion of the glenoid was observed in the peg cementation group when compared to the fully cemented group during the physiological loading. The displacement was greatest at the beginning of the loading protocol and persisted at a diminished rate during the remainder of the loading protocol. Micro-CT scanning demonstrated that the cement mantle remained intact in both groups and that three specimens in the CBACK group demonstrated microfracturing in one area only. Discussion: Displacement of the CPEG implants away from the inferior subchondral bone may represent a suboptimal condition for long-term implant survival. Cement around the back of the implant is suggested to improve initial stability of all polyethylene glenoid implants. Clinical relevance: Full cementation provides greater implant stability when compared to limited cementation techniques for insertion of glenoid implants. Loading characteristics are more favorable when cement is placed along the entire back of the implant contacting the subchondral bone.