1. Does Supplementing Dipnet Samples with Activity Traps Improve the Ability to Assess the Biological Integrity of Macroinvertebrate Communities in Depressional Wetlands?
- Author
-
J. W. Chirhart, R. W. Bouchard, and John A. Genet
- Subjects
Ibis ,Hydrology ,geography ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,Ecology ,biology ,Sampling (statistics) ,Wetland ,Vegetation ,biology.organism_classification ,Index of biological integrity ,Ecoregion ,Biological integrity ,Temperate climate ,Environmental Chemistry ,Environmental science ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Dipnet (DN) sampling is routinely employed for macroinvertebrate bioassessments in wetlands, but it has been demonstrated that some taxa are more effectively collected with activity traps (AT). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used both DN and AT methods to evaluate the biological condition of depressional wetlands in the Mixed Wood Plains (MWP) and Temperate Prairies (TP) ecoregions. Two indices of biotic integrity (IBIs) were developed for each ecoregion using: 1) DN data alone and 2) composite samples consisting of both DN and AT data. ATs collected more active taxa such as diving beetles and swimming Hemiptera. DNs collected more taxa and collected more skating taxa and those associated with sediment or vegetation. A comparison of the effectiveness of the IBIs to evaluate biological condition indicated that the composite data had a slightly better relationship with anthropogenic disturbance and was marginally more precise. A comparison of sampling and processing costs revealed that sampling using composite samples was 130 % greater and processing was 50 % greater compared to DN-only samples. Based on the cost and limited benefit of adding AT samples, a DN-only sampling protocol is recommended to assess biological condition in depressional wetlands.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF