Search

Angiogenesis is a critical event for solid tumor growth and metastasis. Within a given microenvironment, the angiogenic response is determined in part by the balance between angiogenesis inducers and inhibitors. The aim of this study was to establish a thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) ( an antiangiogenic gene) expression vector, and to determine the feasibility for use of TSP-1 in prostate cancer gene therapy. The results of this study showed that pCR-TSP-1, the cloned TSP-1 expression plasmid vector, expressed the TSP-1 gene efficiently in DU145, a human prostate cancer cell line. pCR -TSP-1 did not exert any significant growth inhibitory activity on the tested cell line in vitro. However, TSP-1 overexpression inhibited the growth of DU-145 xenografts in Balb/c nude mice when directly transfected with pCR-TSP-1 in combination with a liposomal agent (DOSPER). Histological analysis showed that there were extensive areas of necrosis in the TSP-1 overexpressing tumors, whereas no necrotic foci were observed in the control tumors. Furthermore, the microvessel density was lower in the TSP-1 overexpressing tumors compared to the control tumors. These results suggest that TSP-1 may be a potentially useful gene for prostate cancer gene therapy.

To evaluate the expression of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1, a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, an important angiogenic factor in solid tumours) in prostate cancer, and their relationship with p53 status.Using immunohistochemistry, the expression of VEGF, TSP-1 and p53 was assessed in 82 archival tissue specimens from 23 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 22 with localized prostate cancer and 37 with metastatic prostate cancer. Seven of the last group had received androgen deprivation therapy. The relationship between the expression of VEGF, TSP-1 and p53 status was also evaluated with tumour grade and stage in patients with prostate cancer.The seven patients receiving hormonal treatment were excluded from the analysis because androgen deprivation significantly increased TSP-1 and decreased VEGF expression (both P0.01). Immunohistochemical analysis showed significantly higher VEGF and significantly lower TSP-1 expression (both P0.01) in prostate cancer than in BPH tissues. There was also significantly higher VEGF and significantly lower TSP-1 expression (both P0.05) in tissues from metastatic than localized prostate cancer. There was no significant correlation between VEGF or TSP-1 expression and Gleason score, but a significant inverse correlation between TSP-1 and VEGF expression. There was a significant association between VEGF expression and p53 status (P0.05), but TSP-1 expression was not associated with p53 status.Angiogenic factors, including VEGF and TSP-1, might be important in the development and progression of prostate cancer. These changes seem to be influenced by p53 status. Identifying the angiogenic factors involved in prostate cancer might lead to the development of diagnostic or therapeutic strategies based on anti-angiogenesis.

Differential expression of the desired gene product in the target tissue is central to the concept of gene therapy. One approach is to use a tissue-specific promoter to drive therapeutic genes, such as the p53 tumor suppressor gene. To determine the feasibility of tissue-specific gene therapy for prostate cancer using prostate specific antigen (PSA) promoter and/or enhancer, in this study, we developed a tissue specific expression vector using a PSA promoter and enhancer. Our results showed that the cloned PSA promoter actively drives gene expression in the PSA-producing prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP). However, barely any promoter activity was detected in the non-PSA producing prostate cancer cell lines (DU145, PC-3) or the non-prostate cell lines (HEK-293, SAOS-2). The wild-type p53 gene driven by this PSA-promoter efficiently suppressed the growth of LNCaP. Moreover, p53 driven by the PSA enhancer-promoter cassette more efficiently suppressed the growth of the PSA-producing prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP) in vitro. This suggest that we were able to manage the tissue specificity by PSA enhancer and promoter. Additionally, the juxtaposed enhancer-promoter cassette showed great enhancement of p53 expression and apoptosis in vitro. Taken together, these results show that PSA enhancer-promoter may be a potential tool for gene therapy for prostate cancer.