Search

A night without sleep is followed by enhanced sleepiness, increased low-frequency activity in the waking EEG, and reduced vigilant attention. The magnitude of these changes is highly variable among healthy individuals. Findings in young men of low and high subjective caffeine sensitivity suggest that adenosinergic mechanisms contribute to inter-individual differences in sleep deprivation-induced changes in EEG theta activity, as well as optimal performance on the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). In comparison to young subjects, healthy adults of older age typically feel less sleepy after sleep deprivation, and show fewer response lapses, and faster reaction times on the PVT, especially in the morning after the night without sleep. We hypothesized that age-related changes in adenosine signal transmission underlie reduced vulnerability to sleep deprivation in older individuals. To test this hypothesis, the combined effects of prolonged wakefulness and the adenosine receptor antagonist, caffeine, on an antero-posterior power gradient in EEG theta activity and PVT performance were analyzed in healthy older and caffeine-insensitive and -sensitive young men. The results show that age-related differences in sleep loss-induced changes in brain rhythmic activity and neurobehavioral functions are mirrored in young individuals of low and high sensitivity to the stimulant effects of caffeine. Moreover, the effects of sleep deprivation and caffeine on regional theta power and vigilant attention are inversely correlated across older and young age groups. Genetic variants of the adenosine A(2A) receptor gene contribute to individual differences in neurobehavioral performance in rested and sleep deprived state, and modulate the actions of caffeine in wakefulness and sleep. Based upon this evidence, we propose that age-related differences in A(2A) receptor-mediated signal transduction could be involved in age-related changes in the vulnerability to acute sleep deprivation.

Background and Purpose: Prolonged wakefulness impairs sustained vigilant attention, measured with the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT), and induces a compensatory increase in sleep intensity in recovery sleep, quantified by slow-wave activity (SWA) in the sleep electroencephalogram (EEG). These effects of sleep deprivation are counteracted by the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine, implying involvement of the adenosine neuromodulator/receptor system. To examine a role for adenosine A(2A) receptors, we investigated whether variation of the A(2A) receptor gene (ADORA2A) modified effects of caffeine on PVT and SWA after sleep deprivation., Experimental Approach: A haplotype analysis of eight single-nucleotide polymorphisms of ADORA2A was performed in 82 volunteers. In 45 young men carrying five different allele combinations, we investigated the effects of prolonged waking and 2 × 200 mg caffeine or 2 × 100 mg modafinil on psychomotor vigilance, sleepiness, and the waking and sleep EEG., Key Results: Throughout extended wakefulness, the carriers of haplotype HT4 performed faster on the PVT than carriers of non-HT4 haplotype alleles. In haplotype HT4, caffeine failed to counteract the waking-induced impairment of PVT performance and the rebound of SWA in recovery sleep. However, caffeine was effective in non-HT4 allele carriers, and modafinil reduced the consequences of prolonged waking, independently of ADORA2A haplotype., Conclusions and Implications: Common genetic variation of ADORA2A is an important determinant of psychomotor vigilance in rested and sleep-deprived state. It also modulates individual responses to caffeine after sleep deprivation. These findings demonstrate a role for adenosine A(2A) receptors in the effects of prolonged wakefulness on vigilant attention and the sleep EEG., (© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Study Objectives: We recently proposed insufficient non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) intensity to contribute to disturbed nocturnal sleep in patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy (NC). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of physiologically intensified NREMS in recovery sleep following sleep deprivation., Design: Nocturnal baseline and recovery sleep architecture, and the sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) before and after 40 hours of sustained wakefulness were compared between 6 drug-free patients with NC (age range: 19-37 years) and 6 individually matched, healthy control subjects (18-43 years)., Measurements: Sleep and sleep EEG power spectra (C3A2 derivation). The dynamics of the homeostatic Process S were estimated from the time course of slow-wave activity (SWA, spectral power within 0.75-4.5 Hz) across consecutive NREMS episodes., Settings: Sleep research laboratory., Results: In baseline, SWA decreased across consecutive NREMS episodes in patients with NC and control subjects. The build-up of SWA, however, was attenuated in NC in the second episode (P = 0.01) due to a higher number of short wake periods (P = 0.02). Prolonged wakefulness increased initial SWA in both groups (P = 0.003) and normalized the baseline differences between patients and control subjects in the time course of SWA in NREMS. The changed dynamics of SWA in the patients in recovery sleep when compared with baseline were associated with reduced numbers of intermittent wake periods in the first (P = 0.01) and second (P = 0.04) NREMS episodes. All patients, but no control subjects, showed a sleep-onset rapid eye movement period (SOREMP) in both baseline and recovery sleep. Sleep deprivation increased SOREMP duration (P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Increased SWA after sleep deprivation indicates that sleep homeostasis is functional in NC. Increased NREMS intensity in recovery sleep postpones sleep fragmentation, supporting our concept that sleep fragmentation is directly related to insufficient NREMS intensity in NC. The persistence of SOREMP despite enhanced NREMS pressure suggests an abnormal interaction between NREMS and REMS regulatory processes.

Study Objectives: To compare electroencephalogram (EEG) dynamics during nocturnal sleep in patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy and healthy controls. Fragmented nocturnal sleep is a prominent feature and contributes to excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy-cataplexy. Only 3 studies have addressed changes in homeostatic sleep regulation as a possible mechanism underlying nocturnal sleep fragmentation in narcolepsy-cataplexy., Design, Setting and Participants: Baseline sleep of 11 drug-naive patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy (19-37 years) and 11 matched controls (18-41 years) was polysomnographically recorded. The EEG was subjected to spectral analysis., Interventions: None, baseline condition., Measurements and Results: All patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy but no control subjects showed a sleep-onset rapid eye movement (REM) episode. Non-REM (NREM)-REM sleep cycles were longer in patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy than in controls (P = 0.04). Mean slow-wave activity declined in both groups across the first 3 NREM sleep episodes (P<0.001). The rate of decline, however, appeared to be steeper in patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy (time constant: narcolepsy-cataplexy 51.1 +/- 23.8 minutes [mean +/- SEM], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.4-108.8 minutes) than in controls (169.4 +/- 81.5 minutes, 95% CI: 110.9-357.6 minutes) as concluded from nonoverlapping 95% confidence interval of the time constants. The steeper decline of SWA in narcolepsy-cataplexy compared to controls was related to an impaired build-up of slow-wave activity in the second cycle. Sleep in the second cycle was interrupted in patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy, when compared with controls, by an increased number (P = 0.01) and longer duration (P = 0.01) of short wake episodes., Conclusions: Insufficient NREM sleep intensity is associated with nonconsolidated nocturnal sleep in narcolepsy-cataplexy. The inability to consolidate sleep manifests itself when NREM sleep intensity has decayed below a certain level and is reflected in an altered time course of slow-wave activity across NREM sleep episodes.

We investigated the effects of radio frequency electromagnetic fields on brain physiology. Twenty-four healthy young men were exposed for 30 min to pulse-modulated or continuous-wave radio frequency electromagnetic fields (900 MHz; peak specific absorption rate 1 W/kg), or sham exposed. During exposure, participants performed cognitive tasks. Waking electroencephalogram was recorded during baseline, immediately after, and 30 and 60 min after exposure. Pulse-modulated radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure reduced reaction speed and increased accuracy in a working-memory task. It also increased spectral power in the waking electroencephalogram in the 10.5-11 Hz range 30 min after exposure. No effects were observed for continuous-wave radio frequency electromagnetic fields. These findings provide further evidence for a nonthermal biological effect of pulsed radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

Caffeine is the most widely used stimulant in Western countries. Some people voluntarily reduce caffeine consumption because it impairs the quality of their sleep. Studies in mice revealed that the disruption of sleep after caffeine is mediated by blockade of adenosine A2A receptors. Here we show in humans that (1) habitual caffeine consumption is associated with reduced sleep quality in self-rated caffeine-sensitive individuals, but not in caffeine-insensitive individuals; (2) the distribution of distinct c.1083T>C genotypes of the adenosine A2A receptor gene (ADORA2A) differs between caffeine-sensitive and -insensitive adults; and (3) the ADORA2A c.1083T>C genotype determines how closely the caffeine-induced changes in brain electrical activity during sleep resemble the alterations observed in patients with insomnia. These data demonstrate a role of adenosine A2A receptors for sleep in humans, and suggest that a common variation in ADORA2A contributes to subjective and objective responses to caffeine on sleep.

Large individual differences characterize the changes induced by sleep deprivation on neurobehavioral functions and rhythmic brain activity. To investigate adenosinergic mechanisms in these differences, we studied the effects of prolonged waking and the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine on sustained vigilant attention and regional electroencephalogram (EEG) power in the ranges of theta activity (6.25-8.25 Hz) in waking and the slow oscillation (<1 Hz) in sleep. Activity in these frequencies is functionally related to sleep deprivation. In 12 subjectively caffeine-sensitive and 10 -insensitive young men, psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) performance and EEG were assessed at 3 h intervals before, during, and after one night without sleep. After 11 and 23 h waking, subjects received 200 mg caffeine and placebo in double-blind, cross-over manner. In the placebo condition, sleep deprivation impaired PVT speed more in caffeine-sensitive than in caffeine-insensitive men. This difference was counteracted by caffeine. Theta power in waking increased more in a frontal EEG derivation than in a posterior derivation. Caffeine attenuated this power gradient in caffeine sensitive subjects. Sleep loss also differently affected the power distribution <1 Hz in non-rapid eye movement sleep between caffeine sensitive and insensitive subjects. Also, this difference was mirrored by the action of caffeine. The effects of sleep deprivation and caffeine on sustained attention and regional EEG power in waking and sleep were inversely related. These findings suggest that adenosinergic mechanisms contribute to individual differences in waking-induced impairment of neurobehavioral performance and functional aspects of EEG topography associated with sleep deprivation.

Neurophysiological and functional imaging studies have demonstrated that frontal regions of the brain are particularly responsive to homeostatic sleep pressure. Previous neuropsychological studies indicate that sleep deprivation causes impairments in prefrontal cortical function. Random number generation (RNG) is thought to provide a sensitive index of executive functions that rely on the prefrontal cortex. The present study tested the hypothesis that sleep deprivation would impair RNG and that caffeine would mitigate this impairment. Healthy young men (n = 21) participated in two 40-h sleep deprivations 1 week apart. During each sleep deprivation period subjects received either caffeine or placebo according to a randomized, double-blind cross-over design, and they completed an oral RNG task at 3-h intervals. Comparison of test sessions at analogous times of day revealed that sleep deprivation was associated with significant drops in the number of responses, a threefold increase in the percentage of rule violations, 59% greater response redundancy and a 20% increase in stereotypy of adjacent response pairs. Sleep deprivation did not consistently alter counting tendency. Caffeine ameliorated the decrease in the number of responses but did not mitigate other deficits in RNG that arose during sleep deprivation. These findings are consistent with prior reports of diminished vigilance and increased perseveration during extended wakefulness. They support the conclusion that caffeine preserves simple aspects of cognitive performance during sleep deprivation, whereas caffeine may not prevent detrimental effects of sleep deprivation on some complex cognitive functions.

Slow, rhythmic oscillations (<5 Hz) in the sleep electroencephalogram may be a sign of synaptic plasticity occurring during sleep. The oscillations, referred to as slow-wave activity (SWA), reflect sleep need and sleep intensity. The amount of SWA is homeostatically regulated. It is enhanced after sleep loss and declines during sleep. Animal studies suggested that sleep need is genetically controlled, yet the physiological mechanisms remain unknown. Here we show in humans that a genetic variant of adenosine deaminase, which is associated with the reduced metabolism of adenosine to inosine, specifically enhances deep sleep and SWA during sleep. In contrast, a distinct polymorphism of the adenosine A(2A) receptor gene, which was associated with interindividual differences in anxiety symptoms after caffeine intake in healthy volunteers, affects the electroencephalogram during sleep and wakefulness in a non-state-specific manner. Our findings indicate a direct role of adenosine in human sleep homeostasis. Moreover, our data suggest that genetic variability in the adenosinergic system contributes to the interindividual variability in brain electrical activity during sleep and wakefulness.

Napping benefits and sustains subsequent performance. Prophylactic naps have been recommended as a means to maintain performance during extended wakefulness, as required during shiftwork. However, napping may cause short-term performance impairments, because awakening from sleep is followed by sleep inertia, a period of hypovigilance and impaired cognitive and behavioral performance. We investigated sleep inertia after an afternoon nap. Healthy 18-28 year-olds (n=50, not sleep deprived) were assigned to sleep, active wake or rest groups for a 2-h experimental phase with polysomnography starting either at 14:00 or 16:00 for half of each group. Before (baseline, 12:30 or 14:30) and in five sessions during the hour after the experimental phase (16:00-17:00 or 18:00-19:00), subjects completed an addition task, an auditory reaction time task, and the Stanford Sleepiness Scale. In session one, addition speed in the sleep group was reduced compared with baseline and with active wake controls, whereas calculation accuracy did not change. Addition speed in the sleep and rest groups increased substantially from session one to session two and reached a level similar to that of the active wake group by the fifth session. In the first session, auditory reaction speed of the sleep group was reduced compared with baseline and with rest controls but did not differ from the active wake group. The slowest reaction times showed significant recovery after 20 min. The groups reported similar increases in subjective sleepiness after the experimental period. These findings provide evidence for performance slowing and recovery during the hour following a 2-h nap opportunity. They highlight the importance of employing multiple control groups and various objective and subjective measures to assess sleep inertia.

Prolonged wakefulness increases electroencephalogram (EEG) low-frequency activity (< 10 Hz) in waking and sleep, and reduces spindle frequency activity (approximately 12-16 Hz) in non-rapid-eye-movement (nonREM) sleep. These physiologic markers of enhanced sleep propensity reflect a sleep-wake-dependent process referred to as sleep homeostasis. We hypothesized that caffeine, an adenosine receptor antagonist, reduces the increase of sleep propensity during waking. To test this hypothesis, we compared the effects of caffeine and placebo on EEG power spectra during and after 40 h of wakefulness. A total of 12 young men underwent two periods of sleep deprivation. According to a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, they received two doses of caffeine (200 mg) or placebo after 11 and 23 h of wakefulness. Sleep propensity was estimated at 3-h intervals by measuring subjective sleepiness and EEG theta (5-8 Hz) activity, and polysomnographic recordings of baseline and recovery nights. Saliva caffeine concentration decreased from 15.7 micromol/l 16 h before the recovery night, to 1.8 micromol/l 1 h before the recovery night. Compared with placebo, caffeine reduced sleepiness and theta activity during wakefulness. Compared with sleep under baseline conditions, sleep deprivation increased 0.75-8.0 Hz activity and reduced spindle frequency activity in nonREM sleep of the recovery nights. Although caffeine approached undetectable saliva concentrations before recovery sleep, it significantly reduced EEG power in the 0.75-2.0 Hz band and enhanced power in the 11.25-20.0 Hz range relative to placebo. These findings suggest that caffeine attenuated the build-up of sleep propensity associated with wakefulness, and support an important role of adenosine and adenosine receptors in the homeostatic regulation of sleep.

Sleep is superior to waking for promoting performance improvements between sessions of visual perceptual and motor learning tasks. Few studies have investigated possible effects of sleep on auditory learning. A key issue is whether sleep specifically promotes learning, or whether restful waking yields similar benefits. According to the "interference hypothesis," sleep facilitates learning because it prevents interference from ongoing sensory input, learning and other cognitive activities that normally occur during waking. We tested this hypothesis by comparing effects of sleep, busy waking (watching a film) and restful waking (lying in the dark) on auditory tone sequence learning. Consistent with recent findings for human language learning, we found that compared with busy waking, sleep between sessions of auditory tone sequence learning enhanced performance improvements. Restful waking provided similar benefits, as predicted based on the interference hypothesis. These findings indicate that physiological, behavioral and environmental conditions that accompany restful waking are sufficient to facilitate learning and may contribute to the facilitation of learning that occurs during sleep.