Search

Background The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy, oral vinorelbine, 50 mg, three times a week for pre-treated, HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods In this multicentric phase II study, patients had to have progressed on AI and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between oral vinorelbine (Arm A) and oral vinorelbine with non-steroidal AI (Arm B). Results 121 patients were included, 61 patients in Arm A and 60 patients in Arm B. The median age was 68 years. 109 patients had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI. The study had been prematurely stopped following the third death due to febrile neutropenia. Median PFS trend was found to be different with 2.3 months and 3.7 months in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.50–1.06, p value = 0.0929). No statistical difference was shown in OS and better tumor response. 56 serious adverse events corresponding to 25 patients (21%) were reported (respectively, 12 (20%) versus 13 (22%) for arms A and B) (NS). Conclusion The addition of AI to oral vinorelbine over oral vinorelbine alone in aromatase inhibitor-resistant metastatic breast cancer was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS. Several unexpected serious adverse events were reported. Metronomic oral vinorelbine schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus tamoxifen in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer biological recurrence, defined by CA-125 increase without radiological (RECIST criteria) or symptomatic evidence of progression. Patients and methods 116 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer presenting an isolated increase of CA-125 were planned to be randomized. Regorafenib was administered orally at 160 or 120 mg daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off or tamoxifen at 40 mg daily, until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was Progression-Free Survival, assessed by progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death (by any cause). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival, Best Response and CA-125 response rate. Results 68 patients were randomized. Median age was 67 years (range: 30-87). Primary site of cancer was ovarian for most patients (92.6%). Tumors were predominantly serous / (89.7%), high grade (83.6%) and initial FIGO staging was III for 69.6% of the patients. Most (79.4%) patients were included after the first line of platinum-based treatment. After a median follow-up of 32 months, there was no difference of progression-free survival (PFS) between regorafenib and tamoxifen groups (p = 0.72), with median PFS of 5.6 months (CI 90%: 3.84-7.52) for the tamoxifen arm and 4.6 months (CI 90%: 3.65-7.33) for the regorafenib arm. There was also no difference in term of overall survival, best response or CA-125 response, delay to next therapy. Regorafenib presented a less favorable safety profile than tamoxifen, with grade 3/4 events occurring for 90.9% of the patients compared to 54.3% for tamoxifen. The most frequent were cutaneous, digestive, and biological events. Notably, hand-foot syndrome occurred in 36.4% of these patients. Conclusion Regorafenib presented an unfavorable toxicity profile compared to tamoxifen, with no superior efficacy in this population of patients.

Background Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is associated with a variable prognosis and unpredictable survival times. We have developed and validated a prognostic nomogram with the objective of improving the prediction of overall survival (OS) in patients treated with chemotherapy. Methods The nomogram was developed using data from a training cohort of patients from two trials, including the chemotherapy-only arm in AURELIA and all randomised patients in CARTAXHY. Multivariable proportional hazards models were generated based on pretreatment characteristics to develop a nomogram that classifies patients based on OS. We subsequently assessed the performance of the nomogram in terms of discrimination and calibration in independent validation patient cohorts: PENELOPE and the bevacizumab-chemotherapy arm of AURELIA. Results The nomogram included six significant OS predictors, in order of importance: performance status, ascites, size of the largest tumour, CA-125, platinum-free interval and primary platinum resistance (C-statistic 0.69). In the training cohort, the median OS in the good, intermediate and poor prognosis groups was 25.3, 15.2 and 7.4 months, respectively. In the PENELOPE validation cohort (C-statistic 0.59), the median OS in the good, intermediate and poor prognosis groups was 18.5, 10.3 and 5.8 months, respectively. In the AURELIA bevacizumab-chemotherapy validation cohort (C-statistic 0.67), the median OS in good, intermediate and poor prognosis groups was 26.7, 13.8 and 10.0 months, respectively. Conclusions This nomogram with six pretreatment characteristics allows prediction of OS in PROC and could be used for stratification of patients in clinical trials as well as for counselling patients about prognosis.

Anemia is common in oncology and negatively impacts quality of life. However, there is lack of knowledge about iron deficiency (ID) epidemiology. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess iron status in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer beginning chemotherapy. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, anemia and ID were evaluated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors and lymphoma before starting chemotherapy. Blood samples were collected at inclusion (W0), 6 weeks (W6), and 12 weeks (W12). Prevalence was evaluated in the general population, according to tumor location and was correlated with tumor response. One hundred twenty-nine patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2015; 119 had solid tumors and 10 lymphomas. At W0, there were no significant difference between locations with a prevalence around 50–60% (range 47.2–70.4%) and only a trend for colorectal cancer (70.4%, P = 0.069) due to a higher prevalence of absolute ID (18.5%). Prevalence of ID+ decreased between W0 and W6 and remained stable until W12 due to the proportion of patients with ID and without anemia. However, anemia prevalence increased during W0 and W6 and remained stable to W6 from W12 due to patients with anemia but without ID. A significant correlation between tumor response and ID prevalence was found (P = 0.036). We confirm the high prevalence of ID and anemia in cancer patients. ID status is correlated to tumor response providing a strong rationale for iron monitoring during cancer management.

Introduction: Bevacizumab-containing therapy is considered a standard-of-care front-line option for stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer based on results of randomized phase 3 trials. The multicenter non-interventional ENCOURAGE prospective cohort study assessed treatment administration and outcomes in the French real-world setting.Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years with planned bevacizumab-containing therapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to assess the safety profile of front-line bevacizumab in routine clinical practice; secondary objectives were to describe patient characteristics, indications/contraindications for bevacizumab, treatment regimens and co-medications, follow-up and monitoring, progression-free survival, and treatment at recurrence. In this non-interventional study, treatment was administered as chosen by the investigator and participation in the trial had no influence on the management of the disease.Results: Of 1,290 patients screened between April 2013 and February 2015, 468 were eligible. Most patients (86%) received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or equivalent, typically with carboplatin (99%) and paclitaxel (98%). The median duration of bevacizumab was 12.2 (range 0–28, interquartile range 6.9–14.9) months; 8% of patients discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicity. The most common adverse events were hypertension (38% of patients), fatigue (35%), and bleeding (32%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Most physicians (90%) reported blood pressure measurement immediately before each bevacizumab infusion and almost all (97%) reported monitoring for proteinuria before each bevacizumab infusion. Median progression-free survival was 17.4 (95% CI, 16.4–19.1) months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI, 58–67%). The most commonly administered chemotherapies at recurrence were carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.Discussion: Clinical outcomes and tolerability with bevacizumab in this real-life setting are consistent with randomized trial results, notwithstanding differences in the treated patient population and treatment schedule.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01832415.

Background: Bevacizumab is approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of ovarian cancer, either in first-line therapy or for patients with recurrent disease not previously treated with the same drug. We aimed to test the value of continuing bevacizumab beyond progression after first-line treatment with the same drug. Methods: In our open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 82 sites in four countries, we enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) who had previously received first-line platinum-based therapy including bevacizumab, and had recurrent (≥6 months since last platinum dose), International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a carboplatin-based doublet intravenously (carboplatin area under the concentration curve [AUC] 5 on day 1 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days; carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days; or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 on day 1, every 28 days), or a carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 14 days combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–carboplatin, or 15 mg/kg every 21 days combined with gemcitabine–carboplatin or paclitaxel–carboplatin). Evaluable disease according to RECIST 1.1 guidelines was required before randomisation. Randomisation was done through the trial website with a minimisation procedure, stratified by centre, time of recurrence, performance status, and type of second-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01802749 and EudraCT 2012-004362-17. Findings: Between Dec 6, 2013, and Nov 11, 2016, 406 patients were recruited (203 [50%] assigned to the bevacizumab group and 203 [50%] to the standard chemotherapy group). 130 patients (64%) in the bevacizumab group and 131 (65%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after receiving a last dose of platinum more than 12 months before, and 146 patients (72%) in the bevacizumab group and 147 (72%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after completion of first-line bevacizumab maintenance. 161 participants (79%) progressed in the standard chemotherapy group, as did 143 (70%) in the bevacizumab group. Median progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 8·4–9·3) in the standard chemotherapy group and 11·8 months (10·8–12·9) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·41–0·65; log-rank p

Resume Introduction Expression IV est une enquete europeenne evaluant les attentes des patientes suivies pour un cancer de l’ovaire concernant les traitements d’entretien. Methode Quatre cent une patientes francaises ont repondu a un questionnaire anonyme. L’objectif etait d’evaluer les connaissances et attentes des patientes vis-a-vis des traitements d’entretien. Resultats Parmi les patientes, 62 % ont recu une information concernant le traitement d’entretien. Parmi les femmes, 37 % beneficiaient d’un traitement d’entretien. Les attentes des patientes etaient une augmentation des chances de guerison pour 73 % d’entre elles, une diminution de la taille tumorale (36 %), une amelioration de la qualite de vie (35 %) et un ralentissement de la croissance tumorale (27 %). Parmi les patientes, 64 % esperaient un gain de survie sans progression (SSP) de plus de 6 mois. Parmi les patientes, 42 % etaient pretes a prendre le traitement pendant 6 a 24 mois, 20 % jusqu’a 60 mois et 38 % jusqu’a progression. Les patientes de plus de 70 ans etaient moins bien informees (48 % vs 66 %) et avaient moins d’espoir de guerison (60 % vs 77 %) que les plus jeunes. Les patientes en rechute avaient plus d’attentes que celles en remission (diminution de la taille tumorale : 47 % vs 22 %, ralentissement de la croissance tumorale : 37 % vs 15 %, survie sans progression superieure a 6 mois : 71 % vs 53 %), etaient pretes a prendre le traitement plus longtemps (prise du traitement jusqu’a progression : 48 % vs 24 %). Conclusion Il existe un ecart entre le benefice publie des traitements d’entretien dans le cancer de l’ovaire et les esperances des patientes necessitant davantage d’informations.

Background Pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel is the standard first-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, based on results from the phase III CLEOPATRA trial. PERUSE was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of investigator-selected taxane with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in this setting. Patients and methods In the ongoing multicentre single-arm phase IIIb PERUSE study, patients with inoperable HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (locally recurrent/metastatic) (LR/MBC) and no prior systemic therapy for LR/MBC (except endocrine therapy) received docetaxel, paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel with trastuzumab [8mg/kg loading dose, then 6mg/kg every 3weeks (q3w)] and pertuzumab (840mg loading dose, then 420mg q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Overall, 1436 patients received at least one treatment dose (initially docetaxel in 775 patients, paclitaxel in 589, nab-paclitaxel in 65; 7 discontinued before starting taxane). Median age was 54years; 29% had received prior trastuzumab. Median treatment duration was 16months for pertuzumab and trastuzumab and 4months for taxane. Compared with docetaxel-containing therapy, paclitaxel-containing therapy was associated with more neuropathy (all-grade peripheral neuropathy 31% versus 16%) but less febrile neutropenia (1% versus 11%) and mucositis (14% versus 25%). At this preliminary analysis (52 months' median follow-up), median PFS was 20.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.9–22.7] months overall (19.6, 23.0 and 18.1months with docetaxel, paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel, respectively). ORR was 80% (95% CI 78%–82%) overall (docetaxel 79%, paclitaxel 83%, nab-paclitaxel 77%). Conclusions Preliminary findings from PERUSE suggest that the safety and efficacy of first-line pertuzumab, trastuzumab and taxane for HER2-positive LR/MBC are consistent with results from CLEOPATRA. Paclitaxel appears to be a valid alternative taxane backbone to docetaxel, offering similar PFS and ORR with a predictable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01572038.

Background. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score assay is a validated assay to help decide the appropriate treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), early-stage breast cancer (EBC) in the adjuvant setting. The choice of adjuvant treatments might vary considerably in different countries according to various treatment guidelines. This prospective multicenter study is the first to assess the impact of the Oncotype DX assay in the French clinical setting. Methods. A total of 100 patients with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative EBC, and node-negative (pN0) disease or micrometastases in up to 3 lymph nodes (pN1mi) were enrolled. Treatment recommendations, physicians’ confidence before and after knowing the Recurrence Score value, and physicians’ perception of the assay were recorded. Results. Of the 100 patients, 95 were evaluable (83 pN0, 12 pN1mi). Treatment recommendations changed in 37% of patients, predominantly from chemoendocrine to endocrine treatment alone. The proportion of patients recommended chemotherapy decreased from 52% pretest to 25% post-test. Of patients originally recommended chemotherapy, 61% were recommended endocrine treatment alone after receiving the Recurrence Score result. For both pN0 and pN1mi patients, post-test recommendations appeared to follow the Recurrence Score result for low and high values. Physicians’ confidence improved significantly. Conclusion. These are the first prospective data on the impact of the Oncotype DX assay on adjuvant treatment decisions in France. Using the assay was associated with a significant change in treatment decisions and an overall reduction in chemotherapy use. These data are consistent with those presented from European and non-European studies. Implications for Practice: This study shows that in estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer (either node-negative or with micrometastases in up to 3 lymph nodes), Oncotype DX testing is associated with a treatment recommendation change in more than a third of patients (primarily from chemoendocrine treatment to endocrine treatment alone but also in the opposite direction) and an overall reduction in chemotherapy use. These results are consistent with those from other decision impact studies worldwide and further emphasize the role of Oncotype DX testing in management of early breast cancer, as reflected in international treatment guidelines.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Predicting early death after a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is very difficult in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system to estimate risk of death at 100 days in elderly cancer patients to assist the therapeutic decision. METHODS: This was a multicentric, prospective cohort study approved by an ethics committee. Elderly cancer patients aged older than 70 years were enrolled before the final therapeutic decision. A standardised CGA was made before the treatment decision at baseline. Within 100 days, event~(death), oncologic and geriatric data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to select the risk factors for the overall population. Score points were assigned to each risk factor using the β coefficient. Internal validation was performed by a bootstrap method. Calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test and accuracy with the mean c-statistic. FINDINGS: One thousand fifty patients (mean age: 82 years) joined the study from April 2012 to December 2014. The independent predictors were~metastatic cancers (odds ratio [OR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.7-3.5] p\textless0 .001); gait speed\textless0.8~m/s (OR 2.1; 95% CI [1.3-3.3] p=0.001); Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)~\textless~17 (OR 8; 95% CI; [3.7-17.3] p\textless0.001), MNA =~17 (OR 4.4; 95% CI, [2.1-9.1) p\textless0.001); performance status (PS)~\textgreater~2 (OR 1.7; 95% CI, [1.1-2.6)] p=0.015) and cancers other than breast cancer~(OR 4; 95% CI, [2.1-7.9] p\textless0.001). We attributed 4 points for MNA\textless17, 3 points for MNA between =~17, 2 points for metastatic cancers, 1 point for gait speed \textless0.8~m/s, 1 point for PS~\textgreater~2 and 3 points for cancers other than breast cancer. The risk of death at 100 days was 4% for 0 to 6 points, 24% for 7 to 8 points, 39% for 9 to 10 points and 67% for 11 points. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first score which estimates early death in elderly cancer patients. The system could assist in the treatment decision for elderly cancer patients.

Background Bevacizumab (bev) is approved in Europe (EU) for first line therapy of OC patients (pts). This study aimed to evaluate the use of Bev in real life, with a focus on toxicity. Methods Representative centers in France of French regions and of mode of practice were asked to participate. From 04/13 to 02/15, among the consecutive OC pts treated in each center, were selected those who were newly diagnosed and planned to receive Bev. An independent CRA captured the clinical data at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 36 months. Results A total of 104 centers participated: Private practice (44%), non-academic hospital (31%), academic (11%), anticancer center (14%). 1290 pts were screened, 500 registered and 468 were evaluable. Pts characteristics at baseline were: median age 65 yrs, antihypertensive therapy (26%), anticoagulant (10%), cardiac history (5%), serous histology (83%), interval surgery (47%), complete surgical debulking (74%) and carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy (98%). Only 3.4% were not FIGO stage IIIB-IV. Pts received Bev at 15 mg/kg (80%) during a median of 18 cycles (10-21) and 7.8% stopped treatment for toxicity. Main toxicity was HTA requiring new therapy (38%), PRES (1.3%), venous thrombosis (5%), proteinuria (9.8%) and nephrotic syndrome (2.6%). Other toxicities mostly reported include low grade epistaxis, gingivorrhagia, arthralgia, headache and dysphonia. Gastrointestinal perforation, fistula, arterial events and grade 3-4 bleeding were very low: 0.2%, 0.8%, 0,1% and 0.2% respectively. No pts developed congestive heart failure nor died from toxicity. Median PFS was 17.4 months (IC95% [16.4-19.1]) and % of pts alive at 3 years was 62.4% (IC95 % [58.1-67.1]). Conclusions In routine practice among French centers, first-line Bev administration is consistent with the EU label in most of the cases. Efficacy and safety in the real life were in line with that reported in trials excepted for a higher incidence of observed HTA and complications, suggesting the importance of increased education on HTA monitoring. Legal entity responsible for the study ARCAGY-GINECO. Funding Roche. Disclosure A. Floquet: Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Clovis; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Tesaro; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. O. Tredan: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): MSD. J. Alexandre: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): PharmaMar; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis. C. Garnier Tixidre: Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. P. Follana: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Tesaro. C. Levache: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. E. Pujade-Lauraine: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Clovis; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro. F. Selle: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): MSD France; Honoraria (self): PharmaMar; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self): Clovis; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD France; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Tesaro; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

1043 Background: For ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), efficacy of endocrine therapy + chemotherapy combination remain an open question. We hypothesized that continuing ER targeted therapy after progression in combination with chemotherapy may improve disease control. The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy,oral vinorelbine, 50mg/3 time a week (OV) for AI pre-treated, ER+/HER2- mBC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had to have progressed on endocrine therapy and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between vinorelbine (OV) and vinorelbine + AI (OV+AI). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). To show an increase of median PFS (from 3.5 to 5.5 month, HR 0.636), with alpha = 5% and power = 80%, 130 evaluable patients were needed. Results: 121 patients were Included (OV = 61; OV+AI = 60). Median age was 68 (range: 49-87), Median time from metastatic diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 0 - 16.9). 109 patients (90%) had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI and had been treated with one line (N = 66, 54.5%), or 2 lines (N = 55, 45.5%) of chemotherapy. Median PFS was increased from 2.3 months with OV to 3.7 months with OV+AI, but this difference was not significant (HR 0.73 [95 % CI 0.50-1.06], log-rank test: P = 0.09) 81 patients (67%) had at least one adverse event (AE) of grade ≥ 3 (40 (66%) for OV vs 41 (68%) for OV+AI). The most common grade ≥ 3 AE were: GT gammas (23%), neutropenia (18%), arterial hypertension and lymphopenia (17%). The occurrence of 3 toxic deaths (OV = 1; OV+AI = 2) secondary to febrile aplasia motivated the early cessation of this clinical trial. 9 patients (5 OV (10%) and 4 OV+AI (8%) presented an objective complete or partial response. Conclusions: The addition of AI to OV over OV alone in AI resistant mBC was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS, but both PFS are lower than expected. Metronomic OV schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number: 2015-000401-39.

5004 Background: Docetaxel (DOCE) is a standard of care in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Several retrospective cohort studies suggest a decrease in PC incidence and mortality with metformin (MET). MET has also demonstrated anti-tumor activity in PC preclinical models, with increase apoptosis when added to DOCE. The addition of MET could enhance DOCE efficacy in mCRPC patients (pts). Methods: TAXOMET is a phase II prospective multicentric randomized controlled trial. Non-diabetic mCRPC pts were assigned 1:1 to receive DOCE 75mg/m2 every 21 days + prednisone (P) 5 mg twice a day and either MET 850mg twice a day (arm A) or placebo (arm B), up to 10 cycles. The primary end point was PSA response rate (≥50% decrease). Main secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR, according to RECIST v1.1), clinical and biological progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Comparisons between arm A and B were performed using Chi² test for qualitative data and Log-rank test for survival data. Results: From January 2013 to December 2015, 99 pts were randomized (50 pts in arm A and 49 pts in arm B) in 10 french centers, and 95 pts were evaluable. No difference was observed between arm A and arm B in PSA-response rate (72% in both arms), ORR (28% in both arms), clinical or biological mPFS (7.3 months vs 5.8 months p = 0.848) and mOS (24.2 months (95CI: 17.2 – 33.7) vs 19.7 months (95CI: 14.8 – 36.8), p = 0.53), respectively. There was no difference between arms in adverse events, except a trend for diarrhea to be more common with MET (70% in arm A vs 50% in arm B, p = 0.072), but few grade 3-4 events. There was no difference in QoL according to QLQ-C30 score between the two arms during the treatment period. Conclusions: This is the first prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the combination of MET with DOCE+P in mCRPC. The addition of MET has no meaningful clinical benefit in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01796028.

11548 Background: Some previous studies in geriatric oncology have described the GI and their adherence. Today’s challenge is to screen patients needing specific GI and repeated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGA). We recently analyzed a phenotype of patients requiring more GI (Boulahssass et al, Cancers 2019). The main purpose of the present study is to compare types of GI implemented, according to patient frailty levels, in order to better understand the necessary care plan. Methods: Between April 2012 and May 2018, 3530 consecutive patients with solid tumors were enrolled in this multicentric, prospective cohort. 3140 patients (mean age:82y) were finally included and a CGA was performed at Baseline. Twelve GI were standardized, individualized or based on experience if no guidelines were available. Within 1 month, geriatricians including patients in the cohort received standardized training. Logistic regression was performed to compare types of GI in the 3 groups using the Balducci Score (B1/B2/B3). Results: 8819 GI were implemented for the 3140 patients. On average, fit patients had 1.5 GI (n = 146), vulnerable patients 2.4 GI (n = 1568) and frail patients 3.3 GI (n = 1426). We observed no significant differences between the 3 groups concerning specific pain management (Fit vs B2: p = 0.19; Fit vs B3: p = 0.57) and psychological care (Fit vs B2:p = 0.03; Fit vs B3:p = 0.24). In vulnerable and frail patients, we recorded more significant GI for nutritional care, delirium prevention, comorbidity management, nursing interventions, social worker interventions, treatment modifications for optimization or iatrogenic disorders and physiotherapy, with the highest Odds Ratio for nursing interventions (Fit vs B2 OR:2.9 p = 0.011; Fit vs B3 OR:9 P < 0.001) and physiotherapy (Fit vs B2:OR 4.3 p < 0.001; Fit vs B3:OR:9 p < 0.001). B3 patients had significantly more GI on care pathways modifications (OR:3.1, p = 0.002) and caregiver care (OR:2, p = 0.049). Conclusions: Fit patients also needed GI. We observed differences in types of GI between the groups. However, the aims and levels also seemed to differ and need further studies to analyze their impact.

Background: Weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine intermittent regimen is a safe and effective combination in first line treatment of MBC including triple negative cancer (Lortholary et al, Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012). In TNMBC, the combination of A with first line Ta or Xel has been shown to improve response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS) (Miller K et al., N Engl J Med 2007, Robert J et al., J Clin Oncol 2011). This phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-TaXel combination in TNMBC. Methods: Patients (pts) with measurable TNMBC were treated in first line until progression with q28 cycles of Ta (80 mg/m2 D1, 8, 15) + Xel (800 mg/m2 bid D1-5, 8-12, 15-19) + A (10 mg/kg D1, 14). Primary end point was best overall RR; secondary were safety, PFS, response duration and overall survival (OS). Results: From 04/2010 to 03/2012, 64 pts were accrued including 2 ineligible pts. Patients characteristics were: median age (56.7 yrs), ECOG PS 0 (55%), histological grade III (61%), previous adjuvant chemotherapy (74%), visceral disease (65%), > 1 metastatic sites (74%). Patients received a median of 6 cycles (1-6), mean 5.1. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombopenia were 23%, 4% and 16% respectively with febrile neutropenia in 5% of pts. G-CSF support was observed in 7% of cycles. Most frequent non hematologic toxicities were alopecia (gr2 40%), hand-foot syndrome (gr2 27%, gr3 13%), nail toxicity (gr2 40%), hypertension (gr3 35%), neuropathy (gr2 26%, gr3 6%), mucositis (gr2 16%, gr3-4 9%), fatigue (gr3 18%, gr4 2%), nausea (gr2 15%, gr3 2%) and thrombosis (gr2 3%, gr3-4 5%). Treatment interruption due to toxicity was 22%, DPD deficiency in one patient, hospitalization 23%. RR was 77%, CR 19%, PR 58%, stable disease 14% and progressive disease 9%. Median response duration was 5.6 months. Median PFS was 7.9 months (6.7-9) and OS 19.2 months (17.3-21.1). Conclusion: A-TaXel is an effective regimen with high RR and manageable toxicity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-13-07.

Background: Health Authorities point out that DPD deficiency confers a significant risk of major toxicity for patients receiving capecitabine. Identification of at-risk patients is thus of major concern. This multicentric prospective study of the French GPCO group (Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique, Unicancer) evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of DPD phenotyping and genotyping to predict severe cap-related toxixity in metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: 303 patients were included between February 2009 and February 2011 (15 institutions). Eighty-eight% received capecitabine as monotherapy, 28% were treated as first line (mean dose at 1st cycle 1957 mg/m2/d). Pre-treatment uracil (U, physiological DPD substrate) plasma concentration was measured in 286 patients (HPLC assay). DPD genotyping (IVS14+1G>A, 2846A>T, 1679T>G, 464T>A) was performed on 281 patients. Severe toxicity (G3-4 CTCAE v3 criteria) was measured over cycles 1-2. Results: Grade 3-4 toxicity (diarrhea, vomiting, hematoxicity, hand-foot syndrome) has been observed in 19.6% of patients (one toxic death). A marked trend for higher U concentrations has been noted in patients developing severe toxicity vs those who didn't (median 12.7 ng/ml (Q1-Q3 9-17) vs median 10.2 ng/ml (range 8-13), respectively, p = 0.014). However, ROC curve has showed that this difference was too small for use as a reliable toxicity predictor. The patient with toxic death had an elevated U concentration at 17 ng/ml. Among the 7 patients with a DPD mutation (3 pts IVS14+1, 3 pts 2846A>T, one 1679T>G, all heterozygous), 5 developed severe toxicity (including the toxic death, 2846A>T), one did not, and the last one was not documented. Relative risk for developing severe toxicity was 4.60 in mutated patients vs wild-type patients (95%CI 2.95-7.16, p = 0.001); positive and negative predictive values were 83.3% and 81.9%, respectively; specificity was 99.5% and sensitivity was 9.8%. Conclusions: Breast cancer patients harbouring a DPD variant allele are at risk to develop severe, up to lethal, capecitabine-related toxicity. Pre-treatment U measurement remains to be more firmly established as a reliable predictor of capecitabine toxicity. These observations are of major interest for breast cancer patients candidate for capecitabine therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-15-04.

Aim To assess the safety and tolerability of adjuvant subcutaneous trastuzumab (Herceptin ® SC, H SC), delivered from an H SC Vial via hand-held syringe (Cohort A) or single-use injection device (Cohort B), with or without chemotherapy, for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive stage I to IIIC early breast cancer (EBC) in the phase III SafeHer study (NCT01566721). Methods Patients received 600 mg fixed-dose H SC every 3 weeks for 18 cycles. The chemotherapy partner was at the investigators' discretion (H SC monotherapy was limited to ≤10% of the population). Data from the first H SC dose until 28 days (plus a 5-day window) after the last dose are presented. Results are descriptive. Results In the overall population, 2282/2573 patients (88.7%) experienced adverse events (AEs). Of the above, 128 (5.0%) patients experienced AEs leading to study drug discontinuation; 596 (23.2%) experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs and 326 (12.7%) experienced serious AEs. Grade ≥ 3 cardiac disorders were reported in 24 patients (0.9%), including congestive heart failure in eight (0.3%). As expected, the AE rates varied according to the timing of chemotherapy in both cohorts, with higher rates in concurrent versus sequential chemotherapy subgroups. In the concurrent chemotherapy subgroup, AEs were more common during the actual period of concurrent chemotherapy compared with the period when patients did not receive concurrent chemotherapy. Conclusion SafeHer confirms the safety and tolerability of the H SC 600 mg fixed dose for 1 year (every 3 weeks for 18 cycles) as adjuvant therapy with concurrent or sequential chemotherapy for HER2-positive EBC. These primary analysis results are consistent with the known safety profile for intravenous H and H SC.

International audience; Background: Deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme is the main cause of severe and lethal fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Various approaches have been developed for DPD-deficiency screening, including DPYD genotyping and phenotyping. The goal of this prospective observational study was to perform exhaustive exome DPYD sequencing and to examine relationships between DPYD variants and toxicity in advanced breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine.Methods: Two-hundred forty-three patients were analysed (88.5% capecitabine monotherapy). Grade 3 and grade 4 capecitabine-related digestive and/or neurologic and/or hemato-toxicities were observed in 10.3% and 2.1% of patients, respectively. DPYD exome, along with flanking intronic regions 3’UTR and 5’UTR, were sequenced on MiSeq Illumina. DPD phenotype was assessed by pre-treatment plasma uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH2) measurement.Results: Among the 48 SNPs identified, 19 were located in coding regions, including 3 novel variations, each observed in a single patient (among which, F100L and A26T, both pathogenic in silico). Combined analysis of deleterious variants *2A, I560S (*13) and D949V showed significant association with grade 3–4 toxicity (sensitivity 16.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) 71.4%, relative risk (RR) 6.7, p16 ng/ml) did not substantially increase the sensitivity, while impairing PPV and RR.Conclusions: Exploring an extended set of deleterious DPYD variants improves the performance of DPYD genotyping for predicting both grade 3–4 and grade 4 toxicities (digestive and/or neurologic and/or hematotoxicities) related to capecitabine, as compared to conventional genotyping restricted to consensual variants *2A, *13 and D949V.

A prospective phase II multicenter study was performed in two steps in paclitaxel-treated ovarian cancer patients in France. A French version of the four-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire was validated. This was then used to evaluate neurotoxicity in relation to erythropoietin treatment. Patients received standard second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and erythropoietin for anemia. Neurotoxicity and hemoglobin levels were evaluated every cycle with the FACT/GOG-Ntx and NCI-CTCAE. The translated questionnaire was tested in 20 patients to confirm the translation accuracy. The final questionnaire was validated in 98 patients with internal consistency (Cronbach’s coefficient) and item correlation (Pearson’s r coefficient) tests. Neurotoxicity severity was analyzed according to erythropoietin intake (first three cycles versus no or late intake) and correlated with anemia. Patients received a median of six paclitaxel cycles (range 1–9). Neurotoxicity was validated in 484 questionnaires. Internal consistency was excellent with Cronbach’s coefficients of ≥0.89 at inclusion, after 3 cycles and at study end. Inter-question correlation was high with Pearson’s coefficients of 0.65–0.85. FACT/GOG-Ntx and NCI-CTCAE severity scoring was similar. Globally, the incidence of severe neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx and NCI-CTCAE) was found significantly higher in patients with severe anemia. Of 98 evaluable patients, 31 received erythropoietin during the first three cycles. Mean hemoglobin level was significantly lower in this group from baseline to cycle 4; however, these anemic patients with early EPO intake did not develop an increase rate of severe neurotoxicity. The French FACT/GOG-Ntx questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. This study raises the possibility that erythropoietin might play a neuroprotective role when administered with paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND The current study was performed to determine the efficacy and safety of first-line combination therapy with bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and capecitabine for triple-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC). METHODS Patients with measurable triple-negative LA/MBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for their disease received 4-weekly cycles of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 for up to 6 cycles) combined with capecitabine (800 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg on days 1 and 14) repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS Between April 2010 and March 2012, 62 eligible patients were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 57 years, 74% had received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 65% had visceral metastases. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range, 1-45 cycles). The objective response rate was 77% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 66%-88%), including complete response in 19% of patients. The median duration of response was 5.6 months (range, 1.3-27.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.3-9.0 months) and the median overall survival was 19.2 months (95% CI, 17.4-20.9 months). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension (35% of patients) and neutropenia (23% of patients); 5% of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade ≥2 hand-foot syndrome, alopecia, and nail toxicity each occurred in 40% of patients (adverse events were recorded before every cycle and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Treatment was interrupted because of toxicity in 22% of patients. CONCLUSIONS A triplet regimen of paclitaxel, capecitabine, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance therapy with capecitabine and bevacizumab demonstrated high activity and manageable safety in this difficult-to-treat population. Cancer 2016;122:3119–26. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Background Sorafenib is an oral anticancer agent targeting Ras-dependent signaling and angiogenic pathways. A phase I trial demonstrated that the combination of gemcitabine and sorafenib was well tolerated and had activity in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) patients. The BAYPAN study was a multicentric, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized phase III trial comparing gemcitabine/sorafenib and gemcitabine/placebo in the treatment of APC. Patients and methods The patient eligibility criteria were locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, no prior therapy for advanced disease and a performance status of zero to two. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v., weekly seven times followed by 1 rest week, then weekly three times every 4 weeks plus sorafenib 200 mg or placebo, two tablets p.o., twice daily continuously. Results Between December 2006 and September 2009, 104 patients were enrolled on the study (52 pts in each arm) and 102 patients were treated. The median and the 6-month PFS were 5.7 months and 48% for gemcitabine/placebo and 3.8 months and 33% for gemcitabine/sorafenib (P = 0.902, stratified log-rank test), respectively. The median overall survivals were 9.2 and 8 months, respectively (P = 0.231, log-rank test). The overall response rates were similar (19 and 23%, respectively). Conclusion The addition of sorafenib to gemcitabine does not improve PFS in APC patients.

Background: The CALYPSO phase III trial compared CD (carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)) with CP (carboplatin-paclitaxel) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Overall survival (OS) data are now mature. Methods: Women with ROC relapsing >6 months after first- or second-line therapy were randomised to CD or CP for six cycles in this international, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The OS analysis is presented here. Results: A total of 976 patients were randomised (467 to CD and 509 to CP). With a median follow-up of 49 months, no statistically significant difference was observed between arms in OS (hazard ratio=0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.85, 1.16); log-rank P=0.94). Median survival times were 30.7 months (CD) and 33.0 months (CP). No statistically significant difference in OS was observed between arms in predetermined subgroups according to age, body mass index, treatment-free interval, measurable disease, number of lines of prior chemotherapy, or performance status. Post-study cross-over was imbalanced between arms, with a greater proportion of patients randomised to CP receiving post-study PLD (68%) than patients randomised to CD receiving post-study paclitaxel (43% P

To determine whether capecitabine schedule adaptation improves the tolerability of capecitabine-paclitaxel combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative MBC were randomized to either arm A (21-day cycles: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14; paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, and 15) or arm B (28-day cycles: capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19; paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, and 15). The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose reductions or delays1 week for grade 3/4 toxicity. Secondary endpoints were efficacy and safety. All 130 randomized patients were evaluable for safety. Dose reduction or delay for grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 39% of patients in arm A and 34% in arm B during cycles 1-6. In arm A, there were significantly more toxicity-related dose reductions (cycles 1-6: 82 vs. 67%, respectively; P = 0.05) and discontinuations (29 vs. 8%, respectively). Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 12 and 0%, respectively, and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 12 versus 9%, respectively (grade 4 not applicable). There were no detectable differences in efficacy. Weekday capecitabine dosing with weekly paclitaxel may improve tolerability without a detrimental effect on efficacy, and merits further evaluation in patients suited to combination chemotherapy.

Background: Despite current treatment options, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains essentially incurable, requiring research on new drugs or combinations to improve survival and quality of life. Patients and Methods: This phase I study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose of all-oral tegafur-uracil (UFT)/folinic acid combined with vinorelbine as chemotherapy for MBC. Starting doses were 40 mg/m2/week of oral vinorelbine administered continuously and 250 mg/m2/day of UFT plus 90 mg/day of folinic acid from day 1 to day 28, followed by a 1-week rest period. Results: Ten patients were included. Eight were evaluable for toxicity and antitumor response. The second dose level was shown to be the MTD. At this dose, 2 out of 5 patients receiving oral vinorelbine at 40 mg/m2/week and UFT at 300 mg/m2/day developed DLT consisting of grade 3 asthenia and grade 3nausea despite standard prophylaxis. Other toxicities were grade 1 diarrhea and anemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The recommended dose for this combination seems to be the first dose level. A stable response was observed for 6 patients (average 33 weeks). This combination appears to be well-tolerated and offers an alternative to intravenous chemotherapy.

Purpose: It has recently been shown that it is possible to improve the prediction of carboplatin clearance by adding plasma cystatin C level (cysC), an endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate, to the other patient characteristics routinely used for carboplatin individual dosing, namely serum creatinine (Scr), actual body weight (ABW), age, and sex. This multicenter pharmacokinetic study was done to evaluate prospectively the benefit of using cysC for carboplatin individual dosing. Experimental Design: The 357 patients included in the study were receiving carboplatin as part of established protocols. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was done using NONMEM program. Seven covariates studied were as follows: Scr, cysC, age, sex, ABW, ideal body weight, and lean body mass. Results: The best covariate equation was as follows: carboplatin clearance (mL/min) = 117.8. (Scr/75)−0.450. (cysC/1,00)−0.385. (ABW/65)+0.504. (age/56)−0.366. 0.847sex, with Scr in μmol/L, cysC in mg/L, ABW in kilograms, age in years, and sex = 0 for male. Using an alternative weight descriptor (ideal body weight or lean body mass) did not improve the prediction. This final covariate model was validated by bootstrap analysis. The bias (mean percentage error) and imprecision (mean absolute percentage error) were +1% and 15%, respectively, on the total population, and were of a similar magnitude in each of the three subgroups of patients defined according to their body mass index. Conclusion: For the first time, a unique formula is proposed for carboplatin individual dosing to patients, which is shown to be equally valid for underweight, normal weight, and obese patients.

Sept etudes sont actuellement publiees, evaluant le role potentiel de la chirurgie d’exerese de la tumeur primitive sur la survie des patientes avec un cancer metastatique.

L’objectif de cette etude etait de comparer les attitudes theoriques par rapport a la participation ou non a un essai randomise controle (ERC) de trois groupes comparables de patientes suivies prospectivement (cancer du sein non metastatique traite par chimiotherapie standard): ayant eu une proposition de participer a un ERC (201 acceptations, 66 refus) ou pas (n = 188). Le refus de participer semble etre une decision personnelle, alors que le souhait reflete davantage l’approbation de la proposition du medecin. Lors de la proposition de participation, les medecins doivent faire face a une aversion envers le procede de randomisation et discuter abondamment des raisons et de l’importance de la randomisation ainsi que de tous les aspects de la participation a un ERC afin de transmettre aux patients toute l’information necessaire pour prendre une decision informee.

The aim of this study was to measure women's preferences about decision-making and their impact to participate or not to a hypothetical randomised controlled trial (RCT).We surveyed prospectively breast cancer patients invited to participate in a clinical RCT (group 1a=201 acceptances, group 1b=66 refusals) or not invited (group 2=188). All women had the same treatment.Decision-making preferences of patients who had refused clinical RCT entry were more patient's centred (72.3%) compared to those of patients who accepted (35.0%, P0.001). Altruism was not a significant determinant of patients' participation. Randomisation was considered acceptable in 52.0% (group 1a) compared to 16.9% and 21.1% for group 1b or group 2, respectively (P0.001). It was the main predictor of willingness to participate in a hypothetical RCT (adjusted odds ratio (OR(adj)) 4.6; 95% confidence interval [2.7-7.7]; P0.001) with the patient group allocation (OR(adj) group 1a=5.0 [2.9-8.7]; group 1b=0.2 [0.0-0.8]; group 2=1 [referent]; P0.001). After multivariate adjustment, willingness to participate was also significantly related with medical decision-making preferences (OR(adj) 2.2 [1.0-4.9]; P=0.045), with the feeling of being unable to refuse a doctor's proposal (OR(adj) 1.8 [1.1-3.2]; P=0.031), and with satisfaction with doctors' communication (OR(adj) 3.1 [1.5-7.8]; P0.001).Patients' acceptance to participate in a RCT is preferred to be doctor's decision, whereas refusal is a personal one. When proposing a RCT, doctors must deal with patients' a priori negative feelings about randomisation. They should thoroughly discuss the reasons for and importance of randomisation as well as the other aspects of participating in the trial in order to give patients all of the information they need to make an informed decision.

Background To examine the impact of a frequent her2 gene polymorphism (Ile655Val) on tumor growth and on the pharmacodynamics of treatment by trastuzumab. Patients and methods Experimental study: The growth characteristics of cells expressing the Ile or Val isoform were examined in vitro and after injection into nude mice. The effect of trastuzumab was determined in both experimental models. Clinical study: 61 patients with advanced breast cancers and treated by trastuzumab were genotyped for HER2 by PCR–RFLP. The influence of HER2 genotype on the trastuzumab treatment was examined. Results Experimental study: HER2-expressing cells acquired the characteristics of tumor cells. The Val isoform-expressing cells showed the highest growth capacity and developed aggressive tumors sensitive to trastuzumab. Clinical study: There was no link between tumor response or survival and HER2 genotype. All cases of treatment-related cardiotoxicity were found in the Ile/Val group and there was no cardiac toxicity in the Val/Val and Ile/Ile patients. Conclusions This study establishes a clear-cut difference between the two HER2 isoforms regarding their tumorogenic potential with an advantage for the Val/HER2 isoform. In breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab, the presence of a Val allele may constitute a risk factor for cardiac toxicity.

Purpose Cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been found to have better clinical outcomes than other patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of RCTs on patients' satisfaction with care. Patients and Methods A prospective study was carried out in a cohort of women with breast cancer (N = 455) divided into those invited to participate in an RCT (201 acceptances, 66 refusals) and a comparable control group not invited to participate (n = 188). All the patients underwent the same treatment (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 for six cycles). One and 7 months after the beginning of chemotherapy, self-administered satisfaction scores were used to compare the women's assessment of their care (Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care validated scale). Results At the beginning of chemotherapy, women to whom RCT had been proposed rated the doctors' availability (average ± standard deviation [SD]: RCT acceptance group, 3.60 ± 0.78; RCT refusal group, 3.68 ± 0.87; control group, 3.41 ± 0.82; P ≤ .02) and the doctors' communication (average ± SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.56 ± 0.88; RCT refusal group, 3.67 ± 0.88; control group, 3.39 ± 0.84; P ≤ .05) higher than those to whom the trial was not proposed. After the treatment, participants in the RCT felt that their doctor was more supportive (average ± SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.04 ± 0.92; control group, 2.77 ± 0.85; P = .005) and more informative about their illness and treatment (average ± SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.34 ± 0.88; control group, 3.08 ± 0.92; P = .006) than those in the control group. The general level of satisfaction was also higher in the RCT acceptance group. Conclusion Women participating in an RCT have a more positive picture of their doctors' care than others, probably because of the structural effects of the informed consent and data collection processes.

Topotecan is indicated in the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancers refractory to prior platinum-based regimen. The aim of this study was to compare the standard therapeutic strategy with a novel strategy of weekly administration of topotecan. The primary endpoints were dose density and overall tolerance. This retrospective cohort study included patients with ovarian cancer in relapse. During a first period (1998–2001), 24 patients received the standard topotecan dose of 1.5 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days with a 3-week interval between each treatment course. During a second period (2003–2006), 21 patients received a weekly topotecan dose of 4 mg/m2 for 3 weeks out of every 4. Grades III and IV haematological toxicities were more frequent with the standard strategy (p < 0.05), even after adjustment of the prescription of erythropoietin and G-CSF. With the weekly strategy, an increase in dose density and a reduction in the number of delayed doses were observed. No significant difference between the 2 strategies was found in terms of response to the treatment and specific survival. This study suggests that the weekly administration of topotecan 4 mg/m2, for 3 weeks out of every 4, results in a better maintenance of dose density and a reduction in haematological toxicity.

published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(15-Suppl):2571, 2015. Poster Session, Developmental Therapeutics - Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. Abstract Number: 2571. Poster Board Number: #287; International audience

Purpose To evaluate early and late reactions, local control, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival of elderly breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant once-weekly hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT). Methods and materials Between 1987 and 1999, 150 patients (median age, 78 years) who presented with 151 nonmetastatic breast tumors were treated with surgery and then adjuvant hypofractionated RT. The clinical stage distribution was as follows: T1 in 47.7%, T2 in 43.2%, T3 in 6.1%, and T4 in 3.0%. Axillary lymph nodes were positive in 33.8% of cases. Estrogen receptors were present in 89.9%, and progesterone receptors in 77.3%. Conservative breast surgery was performed in 71.5% and total mastectomy in 28.5%. RT was delivered once weekly in five fractions of 6.5 Gy to a total dose of 32.5 Gy. A boost was delivered to the tumor bed in 33.1%. Adjuvant hormonal therapy was given in 76.2% of patients. The median follow-up was 65 months. Results The Kaplan-Meier rate of all grades of early skin reactions was 26.5%, and the rate of all late reactions was 45.5%, mainly Grades 1 and 2. Early and late reactions were greater in those who underwent boost RT. The long-term local recurrence rate was 2.3%. The 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival rate was 80% and 71.5%, respectively. The corresponding rates for cause-specific survival were 89.1% and 77.6%. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rate was 71.6% and 46.5%, respectively. These endpoints were influenced by tumor size, lymph node status, and hormone receptor status to varying degrees; however, tumor size appeared to be a major determinant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions This hypofractionated RT scheme resulted in mild early reactions and acceptable late toxicity, in addition to providing excellent long-term local control. It can be proposed to patients who would have difficulties sustaining daily treatment because of old age or disabling associated disease.

Treating patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) represents a significant challenge to oncologists. The tumour-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, is the only treatment approved for these patients. Our study evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QOL) of capecitabine in this setting. Patients (n=126) with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer received capecitabine 1250 mg/m 2 twice daily, days 1–14, followed by a 7-day rest period. Median time to progression was 4.9 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.0–6.4). Thirty-five patients (28%) achieved an objective response (95% CI: 20–36%), including five (4%) complete responses. Median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI: 13.5–19.6 months). Capecitabine demonstrated a favourable safety profile, with a low incidence of treatmentrelated grade 3/4 adverse events. The most common adverse events were hand–foot syndrome and gastrointestinal effects. QOL assessment showed that capecitabine treatment was associated with an increase in mean Global Health Score. Capecitabine is active, well tolerated and improves the QOL of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Based on the consistently high activity demonstrated in clinical trials, capecitabine has become the reference treatment in this setting. # 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

358 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA), a CYP17A1 inhibitor, has been approved in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Germline polymorphisms in genes involved in androgen biosynthesis or transport may influence response and survival in this setting. Methods: ABIGENE is a multicentric prospective non-randomized pharmacogenetic study (NCT01858441). The primary objective was to investigate the association between 13 SNPs in genes related to AA pharmacology (CYP17A1, SLCO2B1 and SLCO2B3) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), according to PCWG2 criteria, in pts with mCRPC treated with first-line AA + prednisone. The main secondary objectives were to evaluate the impact of these SNPs on radiographic and PSA response, overall survival (OS) and toxicity. SNPs were detected in blood samples before starting AA and analyzed by pyrosequencing or PCR-RFLP methods. Kaplan-Meyer’s curves with log-rank tests and cox regression models were used to identify relationships between SNPs and survival. Chi2 tests and student t-tests were used to identify association with response rate and toxicity. Results: 147 pts in 17 french centers were included between 2013 and 2017. Here are presented the results for the first 109 pts. The median follow-up was 28.7 months. Overall response rate (ORR) was 17%, and 74% pts had stable disease as the best response. Median rPFS was 10.9 months (95% CI 9.2-15.3). One SNP (rs10883782) in CYP17A1 was associated with rPFS on AA therapy (Table). Two other SNPs in CYP17A1 (rs4919683) and SLCO2B1 (rs1077858) were significantly associated with radiographic response. Data on PSA response, OS and toxicity will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This is the first prospective dedicated study to show an association between SNPs related to androgen metabolism and clinical outcome in mCRPC treated with AA. Clinical trial information: NCT01858441. [Table: see text]

Purpose. To compare the value of conventional imaging modalities and MRI for determination of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Material and methods. Sixty tumors (53 ductal carcinomas, seven invasive lobular carcinomas) in 51 patients were evaluated by physical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and MRI at baseline before therapy, after three courses of chemotherapy, and after six courses prior to surgery. Data from physical examination and imaging studies were compared to histopathological findings. Results. (i) MRI was the most reliable technique for evaluation of residual tumor size; this parameter was correctly estimated in 63% of cases by MRI versus, respectively 52, 38, and 43% by physical examination, mammography, and ultrasound, (ii) MRI correctly identified the response to chemotherapy in all cases of complete response (five cases), and in 45/55 cases of partial response (43 cases) or no response (12 cases), and (iii) among the 32 patients who underwent a mastectomy, MRI correctly revealed the multifocal nature of the disease for 12/15 multifocal lesions found at histological examination; both mammography and sonography were accurate in only six of the 15 cases. Conclusion. MRI appears to be a valuable technique for assessment of response to chemotherapy and identification of multifocal disease prior to surgery.

1130 Background: Because male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, treatment recommendations are derived from results of trials in female patients (pts). Although, several studies have shown the superiority of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AI) over tamoxifen in menopausal women with advanced breast cancer, the role of such molecules remains unknown in male pts. We report here the largest experience about the efficacy of AI in MBC pts with advanced disease and their impact on estradiol (E) levels. Methods: MBC pts were selected from the breast cancer database of the Centre Antoine-Lacassagne (Nice, France) as follows: Metastatic disease with at least one measurable or assessable non-measurable lesion, estrogen receptor (ER) and/or or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, availability of complete clinical and histological data, evidence of progressive disease at initiation of AI, receipt of at least one month of treatment with non steroidal (anastrozole, letrozole) or steroidal (exemestane) AI. Sex hormone levels were retrospectively assessed on serum samples from our institutional serum bank. Results: 15 pts entered the study. Median age was 68 (range 39–85). 7 pts received previous lines of hormonal therapy (median = 1) and 3 pts a previous line of chemotherapy before the introduction of AI. The best response was complete response in 2 pts (13%), partial response in 4 pts (27%), stable disease (SD) in 2 pts (13%) and progressive disease (PD) in 7 pts (47%). The median duration of objective response (OR) was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6–15.5). At the time of analysis, 8 pts (53%) had died and 7 (47%) were still alive. The median PFS and OS were 4.4 months (95% CI 0.1–8.6) and 33 months (95% CI 18.4–47.6) respectively. The 1-year PFS and OS rates were 20% (95% CI 9.7–30.3) and 84.6% (95% CI 74.6–94.6), respectively. 9 out of 11 pts with available samples had E levels less than the lower limit of the assay during AI treatment. Among the 9 pts with E level decrease, four had OR, one had SD, and four had PD. 1 pt had E levels higher than the upper limit of the assay during AI treatment. This pt showed disease progression. Further data on FSH and testosterone levels will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: AI are active in MBC pts. This activity is correlated with a significant reduction in E levels. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

e13519 Background: For fluoropyrimidines, and especially cap, Health Authorities point out that DPD deficiency confers a significant risk of major toxicity (tox). Identification of at-risk pts is thus relevant. This multicentric prospective study of the French GPCO group (Groupe de Pharmacologie Clinique Oncologique, Unicancer) evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of DPD phenotyping and genotyping for predicting severe cap-related tox in metastatic breast cancer pts. Methods: 303 pts were included (15 institutions), 88% received cap as monotherapy, 28% were treated as first line (mean dose at 1st cycle 1957 mg/m2/d). Pre-treatment dihydrouracil (UH2) and uracil (U) plasma concentrations were measured in 286 pts (HPLC assay). DPD genotyping (IVS14+1G>A, 2846A>T, 1679T>G, 464T>A) was done on 281 pts. Severe tox (G3-4 CTCAE v3 criteria) was measured over cycles 1-2. Results: Grade 3-4 tox (diarrhea, vomiting, hematoxicity, hand-foot syndrome) was observed in 19.6% of pts (one toxic death). A marked trend for higher U (median 12.7 vs 10.2 ng/ml, p=0.014) and UH2 (median 110 vs 93 ng/ml, p=0.011) concentrations was observed in pts developing severe tox vs those who didn’t. However, ROC curves showed that these differences were too small for use as reliable tox predictors. The distribution of UH2/U ratio was similar between pts with or without tox (median 9.1 vs 9.6, respectively, p=0.80). The patient with toxic death had a UH2/U ratio of 6.5 and U concentration of 17 ng/ml. Among the 7 pts with a DPD mutation (3 pts IVS14+1, 3 pts 2846A>T, one 1679T>G, all heterozygous), 5 developed severe tox (including toxic death, 2846A>T), one did not, and the last one was not documented. Relative risk for developing severe tox was 4.60 in mut pts vs wt pts (95%CI 2.95-7.16, p=0.001); positive and negative predictive values were 83.3% and 81.9%, respectively; specificity was 99.5% and sensitivity was 9.8%. Conclusions: These data point out that breast cancer pts harbouring a DPD variant allele are candidate to develop severe, up to lethal, cap-related tox. In contrast, pre-treatment UH2/U ratio and U measurements are not reliable predictors of cap tox. Clinical trial information: Eudract 2008-004136-20.

Le test de 21 genes, OncotypeDX® — Recurrence Score® (RS), est un test valide qui aide a choisir le meilleur traitement chez des femmes ayant un cancer du sein a un stade precoce Her2-negatif et avec des recepteurs aux oestrogenes positifs en situation adjuvante. Les attitudes therapeutiques varient considerablement entre les pays. Cette etude multicentrique est la premiere a evaluer l’impact de l’utilisation du tests OncotypeDX® dans le contexte francais.

e21532Background: Trying to predict the very early death after a CGA is difficult in elderly metastatic cancers. Last year, we presented a clinical score to predict this risk in 815 elderly cancer ...

Background There is no proven benefit of adjuvant treatment of uterine sarcoma (US). SARCGYN phase III study compared adjuvant polychemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy (RT) (arm A) versus RT alone (arm B) conducted to detect an increase ≥ 20% of 3-year PFS. Methods Patients with FIGO stage ≤ III US, physiological age ≤ 65 years; chemotherapy: four cycles of doxorubicin 50 mg/m² d1, ifosfamide 3 g/m²/day d1–2, cisplatin 75 mg/m² d3, (API) + G-CSF q 3 weeks. Study was stopped because of lack of recruitment. Results Eighty-one patients were included: 39 in arm A and 42 in arm B; 52 stage I, 16 stage II, 13 stage III; 53 leiomyosarcomas, 9 undifferenciated sarcomas, 19 carcinosarcomas. Gr 3–4 toxicity during API (/37 patients): thrombopenia (76%), febrile neutropenia (22%) with two toxic deaths; renal gr 3 (1 patient). After a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 41/81 patients recurred, 15 in arm A, 26 in arm B. The 3 years DFS is 55% in arm A, 41% in arm B (P = 0.048). The 3-year overall survival (OS) is 81% in arm A and 69% in arm B (P = 0.41). Conclusion API adjuvant CT statistically increases the 3 year-DFS of patients with US.

International audience