Search

Background Gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility impedes nutrient delivery in critically ill patients with major burns. We aimed to quantify the incidence, timing, and factors associated with GI dysmotility and subsequent nutrition delivery. Methods A 10-year retrospective observational study included mechanically ventilated, adult, critically ill patients with ≥15% total body surface area (TBSA) burns receiving nutrition support. Patients with a single gastric residual volume ≥250 mL were categorized as having GI dysmotility. Daily medical and nutrition data were extracted for ≤14 days in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data are mean (SD) or median (interquartile range). Factors associated with GI dysmotility and the effect on nutrition and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results Fifty-nine patients were eligible; 51% (n = 30) with GI dysmotility and 49% (n = 29) without. Baseline characteristics (dysmotility vs no dysmotility) were age (48 [33-60] vs 34 [26-46] years); Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (16 [12-17] vs 13 [10-16]); sex ([men] 80% vs 86%); and TBSA (49% [35%-59%] vs 38% [26%-55%]). Older age was associated with increased probability of dysmotility (P = .049). GI dysmotility occurred 32 (19-63) hours after ICU admission but was not associated with reduced nutrient delivery. Postpyloric tube insertions were attempted in 83% (n = 25) of patients, with 72% (n = 18) being successful. Postpyloric feeding achieved higher nutrition adequacy than gastric feeding (energy: 82% [95% CI, 70-94] vs 68% [95% CI, 63-74], P = .036; protein: 75% [95% CI, 65-86] vs 61% [95% CI, 56-65], P = .009). Conclusion GI dysmotility occurs early in critically ill burn patients, and postpyloric feeding improves nutrition delivery.

Background Critically ill patients who do not receive invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are a growing population, experiencing complex interventions that may impair dietary intake and nutrition-related outcomes. Objectives The objectives of this study were to quantify intake and nutrition-related outcomes of non-IMV critically ill patients and to establish feasibility of methods to measure nutrition-related outcomes in this population. Methods Non-IMV adult patients expected to remain in the intensive care unit (ICU) for ≥24 h were eligible. Nutrition-related outcomes were assessed at baseline by subjective global assessment (SGA); on alternate study days by mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), calf circumference (CC), and ultrasound of quadriceps muscle layer thickness (QMLT); and daily by body weight and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Data were censored at day 5 or ICU discharge. Dietary intake from all sources, including oral intake via investigator-led weighed food records, was quantified on days 1–3. Feasibility was defined as data completion rate ≥70%. Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or median [interquartile range (IQR)]. Results Twenty-three patients consented (50% male; 53 [42–64] y; ICU stay: 2.8 [1.9–4.0] d). Nutrition-related outcomes at baseline and ICU discharge were as follows: MUAC: 33.2 (8.6) cm (n = 18) and 29.3 (5.4) cm (n = 6); CC: 39.5 (7.4) cm (n = 16) and 37.5 (6.2) cm (n = 6); body weight: 95.3 (34.8) kg (n = 19) and 95.6 (41.0) kg (n = 10); and QMLT: 2.6 (0.8) cm (n = 15) and 2.5 (0.3) cm (n = 5), respectively. Oral intake provided 3155 [1942–5580] kJ and 32 [20–53] g protein, with poor appetite identified as a major barrier. MUAC, CC, QMLT, and SGA were feasible, while BIA and body weight were not. Conclusions Oral intake in critically ill patients not requiring IMV is below estimated requirements, largely because of poor appetite. The small sample and short study duration were not sufficient to quantify changes in nutrition-related outcomes. MUAC, CC, QMLT, and SGA are feasible methods to assess nutrition-related outcomes at a single time point in this population.

Background Protein provision is thought to be integral to attenuating muscle wasting in critical illness, yet patients receive half of that prescribed. As international guidelines lack definitive evidence to support recommendations, understanding clinicians’ views relating to protein practices is of importance. Objectives The objective of this study was to describe Australia and New Zealand intensive care unit (ICU) dietitians’ protein prescription and perceived delivery practices in critically ill adults, including common barriers and associations between ICU clinical experience and protein prescriptions for different clinical conditions. Methods A 42-item descriptive quantitative survey of Australian and New Zealand intensive care dietitians was disseminated through nutrition and ICU society e-mailing lists. Data were collected on respondent demographics and reported protein practices including questions related to a multitrauma case study. Data were analysed using descriptive and content analysis and reported as n (%). Fisher's exact tests were used to compare experience and protein prescriptions. Results Of the 67 responses received (one excluded due to >50% missing data), more than 80% of respondents stated they would prescribe 1.2–1.5 g protein/kg bodyweight/day for most critically ill patients, most commonly using European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines to support prescriptions (n = 61/66, 92%). Most respondents (n = 49/66, 74%) thought their practice achieved 61–80% of protein prescriptions, with frequently reported barriers including fasting periods (n = 59/66, 89%), avoiding energy overfeeding (n = 50/66, 76%), and gastrointestinal intolerance (n = 47/66, 71%). No associations between years of ICU experience and protein prescriptions for 14 of the 15 predefined clinical conditions were present. Conclusions Australian and New Zealand ICU dietitians use international guidelines to inform protein prescriptions of 1.2–1.5 g/kg/day for most clinical conditions, and protein prescriptions do not appear to be influenced by years of ICU experience. Key perceived barriers to protein delivery including avoidance of energy overfeeding and gastrointestinal intolerance could be explored to improve protein adequacy.

Background Malnutrition rates for critically ill patients being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are reported to range from 38% to 78%. Malnutrition in the ICU is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, length of hospital admission, and ICU readmission rates. The high volume of ICU admissions means that efficient screening processes to identify patients at nutritional or malnutrition risk are imperative to appropriately prioritise nutrition intervention. As the proportion of noninvasively mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU increases, the feasibility of using nutrition risk screening tools in this population needs to be established. Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility of using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) with the modified NUtriTion Risk In the Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score for identifying patients at nutritional or malnutrition risk in this population. Methods A single-centre, prospective, descriptive, feasibility study was conducted. The MUST and mNUTRIC tool were completed within 24 h of ICU admission in a convenience sample of noninvasively mechanically ventilated adult patients (≥18 years) by a trained allied health assistant. The number (n) of eligible patients screened, time to complete screening (minutes), and barriers to completion were documented. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation), and the independent samples t-test was used for comparisons between tools. Results Twenty patients were included (60% men; aged 65.3 [13.9] years). Screening using the MUST took a significantly shorter time to complete than screening using the mNUTRIC tool (8.1 [2.8] vs 22.1 [5.6] minutes; p = 0.001). Barriers to completion included obtaining accurate weight history for the MUST and time taken for collection of information and overall training requirements to perform mNUTRIC. Conclusions The MUST took less time and had fewer barriers to completion than mNUTRIC. The MUST may be the more feasible nutrition risk screening tool for use in noninvasively mechanically ventilated critically ill adults.

Aim To determine the prevalence of malnutrition on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and the relationship between nutritional status on admission and clinical outcomes in adult critically ill patients. Methods This was a prospective study in an adult ICU. Patients with expected length of stay (LOS) >48 hours in ICU were assessed for nutritional status using the patient generated-subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) within 48 hours of admission to ICU. Results Primary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortality, ICU and hospital LOS and length of mechanical ventilation. A total of 166 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were aged 59 ± 17 years on average with a mean BMI of 29 ± 7 kg/m2 and a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 19 ± 7. The prevalence of malnutrition in critically ill patients was 36% (n = 60). Mortality rate of malnourished patients was 9% (n = 15) compared to 7.8% (n = 13) in well-nourished patients (adjusted odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-5.03, P = .069). There was no difference in hospital mortality between malnourished patients and well-nourished patients (10.2% vs 10.2% adjusted odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-4.19, P = .096). There was no relationship between nutritional status and length of mechanical ventilation (3.0 vs 1.0 days, P = .382)or ICU LOS (4.7 vs 4.8 days, P = .59). Malnourished patients had a longer LOS in hospital than well-nourished patients (24 vs 17 days, P = .03). Conclusion Malnutrition is an independent risk factor for increased hospital LOS.

Aim To determine whether the placement of a post-pyloric feeding tube (PPFT) can be taught safely and effectively to a critical care dietitian. Methods This is a prospective observational study conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU). The intervention consisted of 19 attempts at post-pyloric intubation by the dietitian. The 10 ‘learning’ attempts were performed by the dietitian under the direction of an experienced (having completed in excess of 50 successful tube placements) user. A subsequent nine ‘consolidation’ attempts were performed under the responsibility of the intensive care consultant on duty. The primary outcome measures were success (i.e. tip of the PPFT being visible in or distal to the duodenum on X-ray) and time (minutes) to PPFT placement. Patients were observed for adverse events per standard clinical practice. Results A total of 19 post-pyloric tube placements were attempted in 18 patients (52 (23–70) years, ICU admission diagnoses: trauma n = 4; respiratory failure n = 3; and burns, pancreatitis and renal failure n = 2 each). No adverse events occurred. Most (75%) patients were sedated, and mechanically ventilated. Prokinetics were used to assist tube placement in 11% (2/19) of attempts, both of which were successful. Placement of PPFT was successful in 58% (11/19) of attempts. Whilst training, the success rate was 40% (4/10) compared with 78% (7/9) once training was consolidated (P = 0.17). In the successful attempts, the mean time to placement was 11.0 minutes (3.9–27.1 minutes). Conclusions A dietitian can be trained to safely and successfully place PPFT in critically ill patients.

Background Optimising nutrition support in critically ill patients with an open abdomen is challenging. Objectives The aims of this study were to (i) quantify the amount and adequacy of nutrition support administered and (ii) determine any relationships that exist between mode of nutrition support delivery and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with an open abdomen. Methods A retrospective review of critically ill patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 h with an open abdomen in a mixed quaternary referral intensive care unit. Enteral and parenteral nutrition (ml) administered daily to patients was recorded for up to 21 days. Length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital and duration of mechanical ventilation (days) were reported. Results Thirty patients were studied [14 male, 68 y (15–90 y), body mass index 25 kg/m2 (11–51 kg/m2), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 20 (7–41), energy goal 1860 kcal/d (1250–2712 kcal/d)]. Patients received 55% (0–117%) of energy goal and 56% (0–105%) protein goal from either enteral or parenteral nutrition. When enteral nutrition was delivered alone or in combination with parenteral nutrition, patients received 48% (0–146%) of their energy and 59% (19–105%) of their protein goal. Patients fed parenteral nutrition, either alone or as supplementary to enteral nutrition (n = 18), received more energy when compared with those who only received enteral nutrition (n = 9) [65 (27–117) vs 49 (15–89) % energy goal, P = 0.025]. Parenteral nutrition was associated with an increased length of stay in hospital [63 (45–156) vs 45 (17–93) d, P = 0.037]. Conclusion Patients with an open abdomen receive about half of their nutrition requirements when fed exclusively via the enteral route. Providing combination enteral and parenteral nutrition to reach nutritional goals may not result in better clinical outcomes for patients with an open abdomen.

The aims of this study were to determine when patients develop feed intolerance, the prevalence of feed intolerance in subgroups, and other factors that influence feed intolerance. Nasogastric delivery of nutrition commonly fails in critically ill patients. However, studies to date have been underpowered to formally define the determinants of feed intolerance.

To investigate the sterilization effectiveness of endoluminal tubal photocoagulation on tubal lumen obliteration.Twenty-four female rabbits were subjected to laparotomy and hysterotomy. Endoluminal tubal photocoagulation was induced over a length of 3 cm in the proximal, extramural fallopian tube by using a cylindrical diffusing tip that emitted diode laser radiation at 805 and 980 nm wavelengths. Tubal patency was evaluated by observing patterns of injected methylene blue and/or breeding success rates.Postoperative recovery was uneventful in all animals. Evidence of occlusion of the tubal lumen included a negative methylene blue test in all 12 tubes treated (tubal occlusion rate 100%) and failure to conceive in 17 of 18 uteri (contraception rate 94.5%). Although identical power settings were used, distinctly lower tubal surface temperatures (about 10 degrees C) were obtained with the 805 nm diode laser as compared to the 980 nm diode laser.The described endoluminal tubal photocoagulation method using a diode laser emitting longer wavelengths (e.g., 980 nm) is suitable for safe and effective sterilization in rabbits and has potential as a new transcervical tubal sterilization method for humans.

The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy of nutrition provision to mechanically ventilated patients in the acute phase after cervical cord injury. High spinal cord injury is associated with reduced gastric emptying due to excessive sympathetic activity from the isolated thoracolumbar cord [1], which is believed to compromise nasogastric delivery of nutrition and worsen clinical outcomes. However, the success of feeding early after high spinal cord injury has not been formally evaluated.

Chronic pelvic inflammatory disease is a common gynecologic diagnosis in women with chronic pelvic pain. When standard antimicrobial therapy does not improve the clinical status, uncommon diagnoses such as Enterobius vermicularis should be considered. In this case, E vermicularis presented as acute and chronic salpingitis in a patient who had had E vermicularis-related appendicitis 5 years earlier.

Using measures of stereotypy such as rearing, licking, and chewing, low dosage administration of amphetamine can be shown to produce increased stereotypy over a period of days. In the present study amphetamine-induced perservation was observed in two sessions when rotational behaviors were used as a behavioral measure. Rotational perseveration occurred in animals receiving both drug and testing experience in session one and session two. Animals receiving either drug or testing experience in session one did not show perseveration with drug and testing experience in session two.