Search

Your search keyword '"Quek Anderson, Dorcas"' showing total 21 results
Start Over Author "Quek Anderson, Dorcas"
21 results on '"Quek Anderson, Dorcas"'

9. FRONT MATTER

Author

Lee, Joel, primary, Lim, Marcus, additional, and Quek Anderson, Dorcas, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. BACK MATTER

Author

Lee, Joel, primary, Lim, Marcus, additional, and Quek Anderson, Dorcas, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Law and COVID-19

Author

Gurrea-Martínez, Aurelio, primary, Findlay, Mark James, additional, Goh, Yihan, additional, Ti, Edward, additional, Gao, Henry S., additional, Tang, Hang Wu, additional, Yip, Man, additional, Soh, Jerrold, additional, Liu, Nicholas, additional, Hsieh, Pasha L., additional, Chen, Christopher C., additional, Koh, Pearlie Ming Choo, additional, Zhang, Wei, additional, Remolina, Nydia, additional, Chik, Warren Bartholomew Kam Wai, additional, De Visser, Maartje, additional, Ong, Benjamin Joshua, additional, Chan, Gary Kok Yew, additional, Tan, Eugene Kheng Boon, additional, Ong, Ee-Ing, additional, Tan, Seow Hon, additional, Low, Kee Yang, additional, Quek Anderson, Dorcas, additional, Ho, Lau Kwan, additional, Siyuan, Chen, additional, and Alexander, Nadja Marie, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Blowing hot and cold in litigation: abuse of process, election or approbation and reprobation? BWG v BWF[2020] SGCA 36

Author

Quek Anderson, Dorcas

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis note analyses the Singapore Court of Appeal's decision in BWG v BWFwhich allowed the adoption of inconsistent positions across related court proceedings against different parties. The decision raises crucial questions on the limits to be imposed on a party's freedom to pursue opposing rights in litigation, and how the doctrines of abuse of process, election by waiver, and approbation and reprobation should be applied. It is argued that the court's application of the abuse of process doctrine obscured the central exercise of assessing all the relevant interests and circumstances. The differing rationales underlying the common law doctrine of election and the equitable doctrine of approbation were also inadequately articulated, resulting in ambivalence concerning why they were deemed inapplicable. Finally, there was a missed opportunity to clarify how the doctrines overlap and yet differ.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results