Search

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an interleukin-12/interleukin-23 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Only limited real-life data on the long-term outcomes of CD patients treated with UST are available. This study assessed UST's long-term effectiveness and safety in a large population-based cohort of moderate to severe CD patients. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study that included both naïve and biologic-experienced patients treated with UST who achieved clinical remission or clinical response after at least one year of treatment. Clinical activity was scored according to the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI). The primary endpoints were the maintenance or achievement of clinical remission after a further 12-month period of treatment, defined as an HBI of ≤5, and safety. Other endpoints included steroid-free remission, mucosal healing (MH), steroid discontinuation, and the need for treatment optimization during the follow-up. Results: Out of 562 CD patients, after an overall 24-month follow-up, clinical remission was present in 450 (80.0%) patients, and at 12 months, clinical remission was observed in 417/437 (95.4%) patients; 33/125 (26.4%) showed clinical response at 12 months ( p = 0.000). A total of 38/103 (36.9%) patients achieved MH. Only 2.1% (12/562), 3% (17/562), and 1.1% (6/562) of patients required surgery, optimization, and re-induction, respectively. Adverse events occurred in eight patients (1.42%). According to a multivariate analysis, the only predictor of long-term remission was the presence of remission at the 12-month follow-up ( p = 0.000). Conclusions : Long-term treatment with UST presents good efficacy and safety profiles in CD patients, especially for patients who achieve remission after one year.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients on biological therapy are receiving vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, it is unclear if IBD therapy could influence the response to this vaccine. In a case-control study, we assessed the antibody profiling after anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in IBD patients on biological therapy., Methods: We analyzed seroprevalence and antibody titer, after 14 weeks from the first BNT162b2 vaccine dose, in IBD patients on biological therapy and health care workers (HCWs). In IBD patients, medical history and disease data were recorded., Results: Eighty-two subjects were enrolled in this study. Among them, 40 were IBD patients on biological therapy and 42 were HCWs. All subjects developed an IgG anti-Spike antibody titer above the cut-off. IBD patients on biological therapy developed a lower antibody titer than HCWs (P<0.00001). No differences were reported in patients who received at least one dose of the vaccine within a period of 7 days from the last biological drug administration, compared to all other IBD patients. A difference was found between patients who were on concomitant immunosuppressive therapy and patients on sole biological therapy (P=0.0287). Patients with presence of any sign of disease activity (clinical, endoscopic or laboratory) showed a higher development of antibody titer compared to those in complete disease remission (P=0.0468)., Conclusions: Our data indicate that in IBD patients, treatment with biological therapies do not affect the seroprevalence but leads to a lower antibody titer development after anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine.

Background: There are few data regarding the diagnostic delay and its predisposing factors in coeliac disease (CD)., Aims: To investigate the overall, the patient-dependant, and the physician-dependant diagnostic delays in CD., Methods: CD adult patients were retrospectively enroled at 19 Italian CD outpatient clinics (2011-2021). Overall, patient-dependant, and physician-dependant diagnostic delays were assessed. Extreme diagnostic, i.e., lying above the third quartile of our population, was also analysed. Multivariable regression models for factors affecting the delay were fitted., Results: Overall, 2362 CD patients (median age at diagnosis 38 years, IQR 27-46; M:F ratio=1:3) were included. The median overall diagnostic delay was 8 months (IQR 5-14), while patient- and physician-dependant delays were 3 (IQR 2-6) and 4 (IQR 2-6) months, respectively. Previous misdiagnosis was associated with greater physician-dependant (1.076, p = 0.005) and overall (0.659, p = 0.001) diagnostic delays. Neurological symptoms (odds ratio 2.311, p = 0.005) and a previous misdiagnosis (coefficient 9.807, p = 0.000) were associated with a greater extreme physician-dependant delay. Gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 1.880, p = 0.004), neurological symptoms (OR 2.313, p = 0.042), and previous misdiagnosis (OR 4.265, p = 0.000) were associated with increased extreme overall diagnostic delay., Conclusion: We identified some factors that hamper CD diagnosis. A proper screening strategy for CD should be implemented., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitors, programmed cell death 1 inhibitors and programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors, have recently emerged as novel drugs in the anti-cancer therapy. Their use in different types of advanced cancer has shown good results and an increase in survival rates. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequent and often require special care. IrAEs may affect all the organs, but they are most commonly seen in skin, lungs, endocrine glands and in the gastrointestinal tract where small bowel, colon, the liver and/or the pancreas can be involved. Despite being usually mild and self-resolving, irAEs may present in severe and life-threatening forms, causing the withdrawal of anti-cancer therapy. IrAEs, therefore, represent a challenging condition to manage that often requires the cooperation between the oncologists and the gastroenterologists in order to identify and treat them adequately., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2021.)