Search

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, in which levamisole (2.5 mg/kg) was given alone or co-administered with ivermectin (200 μg/kg) or albendazole (400 mg), were conducted. In Trial 1, safety and drug– drug interaction were explored in 42 healthy male volunteers. During Trial 2, the safety of the same treatment regimens and their efficacy against the adult worms and microfilariae of Onchocerca volvulus were investigated in 66 infected subjects of both sexes. Safety was determined from the results of detailed clinical and laboratory examinations before treatment, during hospitalization and on day 30. The pharmacokinetic parameters for levamisole alone and the combinations were determined in Trial 1 and then compared with historical data for ivermectin and albendazole, given as single agents, to determine if drug–drug interaction had occurred. The level of efficacy against the adult worms was determined by the examination of histology sections of nodules excised 6 months posttreatment and from the changes seen in the levels of microfilaridermia within a year of treatment. Microfilaricidal efficacy was estimated from the reductions in the levels of microfilaridermia between day 0 (1 day pre-treatment) and day 30. Although the regimens were generally well tolerated, there were unexpected adverse effects in both healthy volunteers and infected subjects. Clinically significant drug–drug interactions resulted in an increase in the bio-availability of ivermectin but a reduction in that of albendazole when these drugs were co-administered with levamisole. Levamisole given alone or with albendazole had little effect on O. volvulus . The combination of levamisole with ivermectin was neither macrofilaricidal nor more effective against the microfilariae and the adult worms than ivermectin alone. The pathogenesis of the adverse events and the drug–drug interactions are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pathogenesis of the sub-optimal response of Onchocerca volvulus to ivermectin was investigated in a 30-month follow-up of 28 individuals who, in a previous study, had been found to show a sub-optimal (N = 15) or adequate response (N = 13) to multiple treatments with the drug. Verbal informed consent was obtained before each subject was given a general clinical and ocular examination. Skin snips were taken from both iliac crests and both calves. Seventeen nodule carriers were hospitalized for nodulectomy. Adult worms were harvested, embryogrammes were constructed and all developmental stages were counted; degenerate, stretched microfilariae were noted separately. All the subjects were in good general health and all except one had received at least one additional treatment with ivermectin since the earlier study. A large proportion of the adult female worms in 10 out of the 11 sub-optimal responders who were nodule carriers were in full embryonic production but most of the stretched microfilariae they carried were degenerate. This picture is similar to that found in adult worms exposed to the first dose of ivermectin. In one subject who had no viable worms in his nodules, the existence of occult but actively reproductive worms was inferred from the high level of microfilaridermia observed less than 12 months after treatment. These observations confirm the existence of populations of adult female O. volvulus that respond poorly to repeated doses of ivermectin. The use of suramin in the treatment of the sub-optimal responders is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted, to determine whether the co-administration of ivermectin with albendazole is safe and more effective against Onchocerca volvulus than ivermectin alone, and whether a significant pharmacokinetic interaction occurs. Forty-two male onchocerciasis patients received ivermectin (200 mug/kg) alone, albendazole (400 mg) alone or the combination. Safety was determined from the results of detailed clinical and laboratory examinations before treatment, during hospitalization and on day 30. Microfilaricidal efficacy was estimated from the reductions in skin counts between day 0 (pretreatment) and day 30. To determine efficacy against the adult worms, two independent observers examined histology slides prepared from nodules excised on day 180; changes in the skin counts of skin microfilariae between days 30 and 365 provided additional indicators of the level of adulticidal activity. Pharmacokinetic parameters for ivermectin and albendazole sulphoxide were defined over 72 h post-treatment. The co-administration of ivermectin with albendazole did not produce more severe adverse effects than ivermectin alone. Both nodule examiners found that the combination was not macrofilaricidal and that it was not clearly superior to ivermectin alone in the effects on reproductive activity; this was supported by the similar efficacy of the two regimens in the suppression of skin microfilariae. There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction. Although the co-administration of ivermectin with albendazole appears safe, it offers no advantage over ivermectin alone in the control of onchocerciasis. The combination does not require an alteration in the dosage of either component. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ivermectin, at the standard dose of 150 micrograms/kg bodyweight, does not kill the adult worms of Onchocerca volvulus and does not disrupt embryogenesis or spermatogenesis. Repeated standard doses, if maintained, arrest microfilarial production but result in only a mild-to-modest macrofilaricidal effect. We investigated whether high doses would effectively kill the adult worms, and whether cessation of microfilarial production could be reproduced by an equivalent, single, high dose. One hundred men participated in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial and received increasing doses of ivermectin from 150 micrograms/kg to 1600 micrograms/kg bodyweight. Nodules were excised at day 180 and examined by histopathology. Total doses of ivermectin up to 1600 micrograms/kg were not significantly more effective than 150 micrograms/kg. Moreover, they did not reproduce the marked inhibitory effects of the repeat standard-dose regimens on embryogenesis, nor the modest effect on adult worm viability, at comparable total doses. These effects may be functions of multiplicities of dosages rather than of the total dose. Our findings also suggest that repeated high-dose regimens are unlikely to be more effective than a similar number of 150 micrograms/kg doses. This deficiency of ivermectin requires that the search for macrofilaricides remains a top priority.

Ivermectin is the drug of choice for the treatment of onchocerciasis. However at the recommended dose of 150 micrograms/kg, it neither kills nor permanently sterilises the adult worms. We investigated whether high doses given with and without a preceding 150 micrograms/kg 'clearing' dose would be tolerable as well as effective against the adult worms. Seventy-five healthy males with moderate to heavy infections with Onchocerca volvulus were enrolled in a double-blind trial to receive one of the following treatment regimens: 150 micrograms/kg followed by placebo (9 patients); 400 micrograms/kg with (9 patients) or without (16 patients) a clearing dose; 600 micrograms/kg with (8 patients) or without (16 patients) a clearing dose and 800 micrograms/kg with (8 patients) or without (9 patients) a clearing dose. Detailed examinations were conducted before and at various times after treatment. A preliminary report on the clinical and laboratory safety as at 30 days is presented. All the regimens were well tolerated. No clinical or laboratory drug related effects were observed. The overall severity of the Mazzotti reaction was similar in all groups. Ocular reactions were minimal and there were no changes in ocular function or in fluorescein angiograms. The groups were similar in the extent of microfilaricidal activity; there was however a suggestion that microfilariae were killed more rapidly at 400 micrograms/kg and 600 micrograms/kg but not at 800 micrograms/kg. This needs further study. Single doses of ivermectin up to 800 micrograms/kg are well tolerated; no special precautions for treatment monitoring are required and a 'clearing' dose is not necessary.