1. Urine biomarker score captures response to induction therapy with lupus nephritis
- Author
-
Cody, Ellen M., Wenderfer, Scott E., Sullivan, Kathleen E., Kim, Alfred H. J., Figg, Wesley, Ghumman, Harneet, and Qiu, Tingting
- Subjects
Urine -- Analysis ,Nephritis -- Care and treatment -- Patient outcomes ,Biological markers -- Analysis ,Health - Abstract
Background The Renal Activity Index for Lupus (RAIL) consists of urine protein assessment of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury molecule-1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, adiponectin, hemopexin, and ceruloplasmin, which non-invasively identifies lupus nephritis (LN). We aimed to delineate RAIL scores with inactive versus active LN and changes over time with response to LN induction therapy. Methods There were 128 pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and age-matched healthy controls recruited in a prospective case control study, with kidney biopsy confirmation of LN. Laboratory and clinical information was recorded and urine collected at diagnosis and end of induction and during maintenance therapy. Response to therapy was assessed by repeat kidney biopsy or laboratory parameters. Urine was assayed for RAIL biomarkers and the RAIL score calculated. Results Pediatric RAIL (pRAIL) scores from 128 children and young adults with SLE (with/without LN: 70/38) including 25 during LN induction therapy, differentiated clinically active LN from inactive LN or without LN, and controls (all p < 0.0017). pRAIL scores significantly decreased with complete LN remission by 1.07 ± 1.7 (p = 0.03). Conclusions The RAIL biomarkers differentiate LN patients based on activity of kidney disease, with decreases of [greater than or equal to] 1 in pRAIL scores indicating complete response to induction therapy. Significantly lower RAIL scores in healthy controls and in SLE patients without known LN raise the possibility of subclinical kidney disease. Graphical abstract, Author(s): Ellen M. Cody [sup.1] , Scott E. Wenderfer [sup.2] [sup.3] , Kathleen E. Sullivan [sup.4] , Alfred H. J. Kim [sup.5] , Wesley Figg [sup.6] , Harneet Ghumman [sup.7] [...]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF