1. Comparison of exsanguination and hemostasis devices for Limb surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled study
- Author
-
Jianjie Xu, Keqi Zhao, Shaonan Xu, Jianqiao Xu, Binbin Sun, Songlin Tong, Wangxiang Yao, Qing Bi, Zhengming Yang, and Weifeng Zhou
- Subjects
Exsanguination tourniquet ring ,Exsanguination ,Tourniquets ,Hemostasis ,Surgical ,Clinical trials ,Diseases of the musculoskeletal system ,RC925-935 - Abstract
Abstract Background Excessive intraoperative bleeding remains a challenge in limb surgeries. The exsanguination tourniquet ring has emerged as a potential solution for effective exsanguination and hemostasis. This study aims to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared to the conventional exsanguination and hemostasis approach (pneumatic tourniquet combined with Esmarch bandage). Methods This randomized controlled trial evaluates the exsanguination tourniquet ring’s effectiveness and safety versus the conventional approach in 220 participants undergoing various limb surgeries. Allocation included experimental and control groups, assesses through efficacy (including intraoperative and total blood loss, hemoglobin levels, and exsanguination and hemostasis effectiveness) and safety (adverse event occurrence) indicators. Results The experimental group (n = 110) utilizes the exsanguination tourniquet ring, while the control group (n = 110) employs the conventional approach. As for intraoperative blood loss, the experimental group is non-inferior to the control group (p-value
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF