Search

Objectives: To propose a novel functional Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) category system integrated with coronary CT angiography (CCTA)–derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) and to validate its effect on therapeutic decision and prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: Firstly, we proposed a novel functional CAD-RADS and evaluated the performance of functional CAD-RADS for guiding treatment strategies with actual clinical treatment as a reference standard in a retrospective multicenter cohort with CCTA and invasive FFR performed in all patients (n = 466). Net reclassification improvement (NRI) of functional CAD-RADS over anatomical CAD-RADS was calculated. Secondly, the prognostic value of functional CAD-RADS in a prospective two-arm cohort (566 [FFRCT arm] vs. 567 [CCTA arm]) was calculated, after a 1-year follow-up, functional CAD-RADS in FFRCT arm (n = 513) and anatomical CAD-RADS in CCTA arm (n = 511) to determine patients at risk of adverse outcomes were compared with a Cox hazard proportional model. Results: Functional CAD-RADS demonstrated superior value over anatomical CAD-RADS (AUC: 0.828 vs. 0.681, p < 0.001) and comparable performance to FFR (AUC: 0.828 vs. 0.848, p = 0.253) in guiding therapeutic decisions. Functional CAD-RADS resulted in the revision of management plan as determined by anatomical CAD-RADS in 30.0% of patients (n = 140) (NRI = 0.369, p < 0.001). Functional CAD-RADS was an independent predictor for 1-year outcomes with indexes of concordance of 0.795 and the corresponding value was 0.751 in anatomical CAD-RADS. Conclusion: The novel functional CAD-RADS gained incremental value in guiding therapeutic decision-making compared with anatomical CAD-RADS and comparable power in 1-year prognosis with anatomical CAD-RADS in a real-world scenario. Key Points: • The novel functional CAD-RADS category system with FFRCTintegrated into the anatomical CAD-RADS categories was originally proposed. • The novel functional CAD-RADS category system was validated superior value over anatomical CAD-RADS (AUC: 0.828 vs. 0.681, p < 0.001) in guiding therapeutic decisions and revised management plan in 30.0% of patients as determined by anatomical CAD-RADS (net reclassification improvement index = 0.369, p < 0.001). • Functional CAD-RADS was an independent predictor with an index of concordance of 0.795 and 0.751 in anatomical CAD-RADS for 1-year prognosis of adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore downstream management and outcomes of machine learning (ML)–based CT derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) strategy compared with an anatomical coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) alone assessment in participants with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods: In this prospective study conducted from April 2018 to March 2019, participants were assigned to either the CCTA or FFRCT group. The primary endpoint was the rate of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) that demonstrated non-obstructive disease at 90 days. Secondary endpoints included coronary revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year follow-up. Results: In total, 567 participants were allocated to the CCTA group and 566 to the FFRCT group. At 90 days, the rate of ICA without obstructive disease was higher in the CCTA group (33.3%, 39/117) than that (19.8%, 19/96) in the FFRCT group (risk difference [RD] = 13.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4%, 18.6%; p = 0.03). The ICA referral rate was higher in the CCTA group (27.5%, 156/567) than in the FFRCT group (20.3%, 115/566) (RD = 7.2%, 95% CI: 2.3%, 12.1%; p = 0.003). The revascularization-to-ICA ratio was lower in the CCTA group than that in the FFRCT group (RD = 19.8%, 95% CI: 14.1%, 25.5%, p = 0.002). MACE was more common in the CCTA group than that in the FFRCT group at 1 year (HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.95; p = 0.04). Conclusion: In patients with intermediate stenosis, the FFRCT strategy appears to be associated with a lower rate of referral for ICA, ICA without obstructive disease, and 1-year MACE when compared to the anatomical CCTA alone strategy. Key Points: • In stable patients with intermediate stenosis, ML-based FFRCT strategy was associated with a lower referral ICA rate, a lower normalcy rate of ICA, and higher revascularization-to-ICA ratio than the CCTA strategy. • Compared with the CCTA strategy, ML-based FFRCTshows superior outcome prediction value which appears to be associated with a lower rate of 1-year MACE. • ML-based FFRCT strategy as a non-invasive "one-stop-shop" modality may be the potential to change diagnostic workflows in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims This study was aimed at investigating whether a machine learning (ML)-based coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) SYNTAX score (SS), 'Functional SYNTAX score' (FSSCTA), would predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results The SS based on CCTA (SSCTA) and ICA (SSICA) were retrospectively collected in 227 consecutive patients with three-vessel CAD. FSSCTA was calculated by combining the anatomical data with functional data derived from a ML-based CT-FFR assessment. The ability of each score system to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was compared. The difference between revascularization strategies directed by the anatomical SS and FSSCTA was also assessed. Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were divided into two groups according to the SSCTA cut-off value of 22. After determining FSSCTA for each patient, 22.9% of patients (52/227) were reclassified to a low-risk group (FSSCTA ≤ 22). In the low- vs. intermediate-to-high (>22) FSSCTA group, MACE occurred in 3.2% (4/125) vs. 34.3% (35/102), respectively (P <  0.001). The independent predictors of MACE were FSSCTA (OR = 1.21, P  =   0.001) and diabetes (OR = 2.35, P  =   0.048). FSSCTA demonstrated a better predictive accuracy for MACE compared with SSCTA (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.75, P  =   0.01) and SSICA (0.81 vs. 0.75, P <  0.001). After FSSCTA was revealed, 52 patients initially referred for CABG based on SSCTA would have been changed to PCI. Conclusion Recalculating SS by incorporating lesion-specific ischaemia as determined by ML-based CT-FFR is a better predictor of MACE in patients with three-vessel CAD. Additionally, the use of FSSCTA may alter selected revascularization strategies in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate the feasibility and prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in patients who have undergone stents implantation. Methods: Firstly, the feasibility of FFRCT in stented vessels was validated. The diagnostic performance of FFRCT in identifying hemodynamically in-stent restenosis (ISR) in 33 patients with invasive FFR ≤ 0.88 as reference standard, intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) between FFRCT and FFR was calculated. Secondly, prognostic value was assessed with 115 patients with serial CCTA scans after PCI. Stent characteristics (location, diameter, length, etc.), CCTA measurements (minimum lumen diameter [MLD], minimum lumen area [MLA], ISR), and FFRCT measurements (FFRCT, ΔFFRCT, ΔFFRCT/stent length) both at baseline and follow-up were recorded. Longitudinal analysis included changes of MLD, MLA, ISR, and FFRCT. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Results: Per-patient accuracy of FFRCT was 0.85 in identifying hemodynamically ISR. FFRCT had a good correlation with FFR (ICC = 0.84). 15.7% (18/115) developed MACE during 25 months since follow-up CCTA. Lasso regression identified age and follow-up ΔFFRCT/length as candidate variables. In the Cox proportional hazards model, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.102 [95% CI, 1.032–1.177]; p = 0.004) and follow-up ΔFFRCT/length (HR, 1.014 [95% CI, 1.006–1.023]; p = 0.001) were independently associated with MACE (c-index = 0.856). Time-dependent ROC analysis showed AUC was 0.787 (95% CI, 0.594–0.980) at 25 months to predict adverse outcome. After bootstrap validation with 1000 resamplings, the bias-corrected c-index was 0.846. Conclusions: Noninvasive ML-based FFRCT is feasible in patients following stents implantation and shows prognostic value in predicting adverse events after stents implantation in low-moderate risk patients. Key Points: • Machine-learning-based FFRCTis feasible to evaluate the functional significance of in-stent restenosis in patients with stent implantation. • Follow-up △FFRCTalong with the stent length might have prognostic implication in patients with stent implantation and low-to-moderate risk after 2 years follow-up. The prognostic role of FFRCTin patients with moderate-to-high or high risk needs to be further studied. • FFRCTmight refine the clinical pathway of patients with stent implantation to invasive catheterization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This study was aimed at investigating whether a machine learning (ML)-based coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) SYNTAX score (SS), 'Functional SYNTAX score' (FSSCTA), would predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD)., Methods and Results: The SS based on CCTA (SSCTA) and ICA (SSICA) were retrospectively collected in 227 consecutive patients with three-vessel CAD. FSSCTA was calculated by combining the anatomical data with functional data derived from a ML-based CT-FFR assessment. The ability of each score system to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was compared. The difference between revascularization strategies directed by the anatomical SS and FSSCTA was also assessed. Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were divided into two groups according to the SSCTA cut-off value of 22. After determining FSSCTA for each patient, 22.9% of patients (52/227) were reclassified to a low-risk group (FSSCTA ≤ 22). In the low- vs. intermediate-to-high (>22) FSSCTA group, MACE occurred in 3.2% (4/125) vs. 34.3% (35/102), respectively (P < 0.001). The independent predictors of MACE were FSSCTA (OR = 1.21, P = 0.001) and diabetes (OR = 2.35, P = 0.048). FSSCTA demonstrated a better predictive accuracy for MACE compared with SSCTA (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.75, P = 0.01) and SSICA (0.81 vs. 0.75, P < 0.001). After FSSCTA was revealed, 52 patients initially referred for CABG based on SSCTA would have been changed to PCI., Conclusion: Recalculating SS by incorporating lesion-specific ischaemia as determined by ML-based CT-FFR is a better predictor of MACE in patients with three-vessel CAD. Additionally, the use of FSSCTA may alter selected revascularization strategies in these patients., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)