Search

Your search keyword '"Pummerer L"' showing total 8 results
Start Over Author "Pummerer L"
8 results on '"Pummerer L"'

1. COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey dataset on psychological and behavioural consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak

Author

Yamada, Y, Cepulic, D, Coll-Martin, T, Debove, S, Gautreau, G, Han, H, Rasmussen, J, Tran, T, Travaglino, G, Blackburn, A, Boullu, L, Bujic, M, Byrne, G, Caniels, M, Flis, I, Kowal, M, Rachev, N, Reynoso-Alcantara, V, Zerhouni, O, Ahmed, O, Amin, R, Aquino, S, Areias, J, Aruta, J, Bamwesigye, D, Bavolar, J, Bender, A, Bhandari, P, Bircan, T, Cakal, H, Capelos, T, Cenek, J, Ch'Ng, B, Chen, F, Chrona, S, Contreras-Ibanez, C, Correa, P, Cristofori, I, Cyrus-Lai, W, Delgado-Garcia, G, Deschrijver, E, Diaz, C, Dilekler, I, Dranseika, V, Dubrov, D, Eichel, K, Ermagan-Caglar, E, Gelpi, R, Gonzalez, R, Griffin, A, Hakim, M, Hanusz, K, Ho, Y, Hristova, D, Hubena, B, Ihaya, K, Ikizer, G, Islam, M, Jeftic, A, Jha, S, Juarez, F, Kacmar, P, Kalinova, K, Kavanagh, P, Kosa, M, Koszalkowska, K, Kumaga, R, Lacko, D, Lee, Y, Lentoor, A, De Leon, G, Lin, S, Lins, S, Lopez, C, Lys, A, Mahlungulu, S, Makaveeva, T, Mamede, S, Mari, S, Marot, T, Martinez, L, Meshi, D, Mola, D, Morales-Izquierdo, S, Musliu, A, Naidu, P, Najmussaqib, A, Natividade, J, Nebel, S, Nezkusilova, J, Nikolova, I, Ninaus, M, Noreika, V, Ortiz, M, Ozery, D, Pankowski, D, Pennato, T, Pirko, M, Pummerer, L, Reyna, C, Romano, E, Sahin, H, Sanli, A, Sayilan, G, Scarpaci, A, Sechi, C, Shani, M, Shata, A, Sikka, P, Sinha, N, Stockli, S, Studzinska, A, Sungailaite, E, Szebeni, Z, Tag, B, Taranu, M, Tisocco, F, Tuominen, J, Turk, F, Uddin, M, Uzelac, E, Vestergren, S, Vilar, R, Wang, A, West, J, Wu, C, Yaneva, T, Yeh, Y, Lieberoth, A, Yamada Y., Cepulic D. -B., Coll-Martin T., Debove S., Gautreau G., Han H., Rasmussen J., Tran T. P., Travaglino G. A., Blackburn A. M., Boullu L., Bujic M., Byrne G., Caniels M. C. J., Flis I., Kowal M., Rachev N. R., Reynoso-Alcantara V., Zerhouni O., Ahmed O., Amin R., Aquino S., Areias J. C., Aruta J. J. B. R., Bamwesigye D., Bavolar J., Bender A. R., Bhandari P., Bircan T., Cakal H., Capelos T., Cenek J., Ch'ng B., Chen F. -Y., Chrona S., Contreras-Ibanez C. C., Correa P. S., Cristofori I., Cyrus-Lai W., Delgado-Garcia G., Deschrijver E., Diaz C., Dilekler I., Dranseika V., Dubrov D., Eichel K., Ermagan-Caglar E., Gelpi R., Gonzalez R. F., Griffin A., Hakim M. A., Hanusz K., Ho Y. W., Hristova D., Hubena B., Ihaya K., Ikizer G., Islam M. N., Jeftic A., Jha S., Juarez F. P. -G., Kacmar P., Kalinova K., Kavanagh P. S., Kosa M., Koszalkowska K., Kumaga R., Lacko D., Lee Y., Lentoor A. G., De Leon G. A., Lin S. -Y., Lins S., Lopez C. R. C., Lys A. E., Mahlungulu S., Makaveeva T., Mamede S., Mari S., Marot T. A., Martinez L., Meshi D., Mola D. J., Morales-Izquierdo S., Musliu A., Naidu P. A., Najmussaqib A., Natividade J. C., Nebel S., Nezkusilova J., Nikolova I., Ninaus M., Noreika V., Ortiz M. V., Ozery D. H., Pankowski D., Pennato T., Pirko M., Pummerer L., Reyna C., Romano E., Sahin H., Sanli A. M., Sayilan G., Scarpaci A., Sechi C., Shani M., Shata A., Sikka P., Sinha N., Stockli S., Studzinska A., Sungailaite E., Szebeni Z., Tag B., Taranu M., Tisocco F., Tuominen J., Turk F., Uddin M. K., Uzelac E., Vestergren S., Vilar R., Wang A. H. -E., West J. N., Wu C. K. S., Yaneva T., Yeh Y. -Y., Lieberoth A., Yamada, Y, Cepulic, D, Coll-Martin, T, Debove, S, Gautreau, G, Han, H, Rasmussen, J, Tran, T, Travaglino, G, Blackburn, A, Boullu, L, Bujic, M, Byrne, G, Caniels, M, Flis, I, Kowal, M, Rachev, N, Reynoso-Alcantara, V, Zerhouni, O, Ahmed, O, Amin, R, Aquino, S, Areias, J, Aruta, J, Bamwesigye, D, Bavolar, J, Bender, A, Bhandari, P, Bircan, T, Cakal, H, Capelos, T, Cenek, J, Ch'Ng, B, Chen, F, Chrona, S, Contreras-Ibanez, C, Correa, P, Cristofori, I, Cyrus-Lai, W, Delgado-Garcia, G, Deschrijver, E, Diaz, C, Dilekler, I, Dranseika, V, Dubrov, D, Eichel, K, Ermagan-Caglar, E, Gelpi, R, Gonzalez, R, Griffin, A, Hakim, M, Hanusz, K, Ho, Y, Hristova, D, Hubena, B, Ihaya, K, Ikizer, G, Islam, M, Jeftic, A, Jha, S, Juarez, F, Kacmar, P, Kalinova, K, Kavanagh, P, Kosa, M, Koszalkowska, K, Kumaga, R, Lacko, D, Lee, Y, Lentoor, A, De Leon, G, Lin, S, Lins, S, Lopez, C, Lys, A, Mahlungulu, S, Makaveeva, T, Mamede, S, Mari, S, Marot, T, Martinez, L, Meshi, D, Mola, D, Morales-Izquierdo, S, Musliu, A, Naidu, P, Najmussaqib, A, Natividade, J, Nebel, S, Nezkusilova, J, Nikolova, I, Ninaus, M, Noreika, V, Ortiz, M, Ozery, D, Pankowski, D, Pennato, T, Pirko, M, Pummerer, L, Reyna, C, Romano, E, Sahin, H, Sanli, A, Sayilan, G, Scarpaci, A, Sechi, C, Shani, M, Shata, A, Sikka, P, Sinha, N, Stockli, S, Studzinska, A, Sungailaite, E, Szebeni, Z, Tag, B, Taranu, M, Tisocco, F, Tuominen, J, Turk, F, Uddin, M, Uzelac, E, Vestergren, S, Vilar, R, Wang, A, West, J, Wu, C, Yaneva, T, Yeh, Y, Lieberoth, A, Yamada Y., Cepulic D. -B., Coll-Martin T., Debove S., Gautreau G., Han H., Rasmussen J., Tran T. P., Travaglino G. A., Blackburn A. M., Boullu L., Bujic M., Byrne G., Caniels M. C. J., Flis I., Kowal M., Rachev N. R., Reynoso-Alcantara V., Zerhouni O., Ahmed O., Amin R., Aquino S., Areias J. C., Aruta J. J. B. R., Bamwesigye D., Bavolar J., Bender A. R., Bhandari P., Bircan T., Cakal H., Capelos T., Cenek J., Ch'ng B., Chen F. -Y., Chrona S., Contreras-Ibanez C. C., Correa P. S., Cristofori I., Cyrus-Lai W., Delgado-Garcia G., Deschrijver E., Diaz C., Dilekler I., Dranseika V., Dubrov D., Eichel K., Ermagan-Caglar E., Gelpi R., Gonzalez R. F., Griffin A., Hakim M. A., Hanusz K., Ho Y. W., Hristova D., Hubena B., Ihaya K., Ikizer G., Islam M. N., Jeftic A., Jha S., Juarez F. P. -G., Kacmar P., Kalinova K., Kavanagh P. S., Kosa M., Koszalkowska K., Kumaga R., Lacko D., Lee Y., Lentoor A. G., De Leon G. A., Lin S. -Y., Lins S., Lopez C. R. C., Lys A. E., Mahlungulu S., Makaveeva T., Mamede S., Mari S., Marot T. A., Martinez L., Meshi D., Mola D. J., Morales-Izquierdo S., Musliu A., Naidu P. A., Najmussaqib A., Natividade J. C., Nebel S., Nezkusilova J., Nikolova I., Ninaus M., Noreika V., Ortiz M. V., Ozery D. H., Pankowski D., Pennato T., Pirko M., Pummerer L., Reyna C., Romano E., Sahin H., Sanli A. M., Sayilan G., Scarpaci A., Sechi C., Shani M., Shata A., Sikka P., Sinha N., Stockli S., Studzinska A., Sungailaite E., Szebeni Z., Tag B., Taranu M., Tisocco F., Tuominen J., Turk F., Uddin M. K., Uzelac E., Vestergren S., Vilar R., Wang A. H. -E., West J. N., Wu C. K. S., Yaneva T., Yeh Y. -Y., and Lieberoth A.

Abstract

This N = 173,426 social science dataset was collected through the collaborative COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey – an open science effort to improve understanding of the human experiences of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic between 30th March and 30th May, 2020. The dataset allows a cross-cultural study of psychological and behavioural responses to the Coronavirus pandemic and associated government measures like cancellation of public functions and stay at home orders implemented in many countries. The dataset contains demographic background variables as well as measures of Asian Disease Problem, perceived stress (PSS-10), availability of social provisions (SPS-10), trust in various authorities, trust in governmental measures to contain the virus (OECD trust), personality traits (BFF-15), information behaviours, agreement with the level of government intervention, and compliance with preventive measures, along with a rich pool of exploratory variables and written experiences. A global consortium from 39 countries and regions worked together to build and translate a survey with variables of shared interests, and recruited participants in 47 languages and dialects. Raw plus cleaned data and dynamic visualizations are available.

Published
2021

2. Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

Author

Lieberoth, A, Lin, S-Y, Stockli, S, Han, H, Kowal, M, Gelpi, R, Chrona, S, Tran, TP, Jeftic, A, Rasmussen, J, Cakal, H, Milfont, TL, Yamada, Y, Amin, R, Debove, S, Flis, I, Sahin, H, Turk, F, Yeh, Y-Y, Ho, YW, Sikka, P, Delgado-Garcia, G, Lacko, D, Mamede, S, Zerhouni, O, Tuominen, J, Bircan, T, Wang, AH-E, Ikizer, G, Lins, S, Studzinska, A, Uddin, MK, Juarez, FP-G, Chen, F-Y, Sanli, AM, Lys, AE, Reynoso-Alcantara, V, Flores Gonzalez, R, Griffin, AM, Lopez, CRC, Nezkusilova, J, Cepulic, D-B, Aquino, S, Marot, TA, Blackburn, AM, Boullu, L, Bavolar, J, Kacmar, P, Wu, CKS, Areias, JC, Natividade, JC, Mari, S, Ahmed, O, Dranseika, V, Cristofori, I, Coll-Martin, T, Eichel, K, Kumaga, R, Ermagan-Caglar, E, Bamwesigye, D, Tag, B, Contreras-Ibanez, CC, Aruta, JJBR, Naidu, PA, Dilekler, I, Cenek, J, Islam, MN, Ch'ng, B, Sechi, C, Nebel, S, Sayilan, G, Jha, S, Vestergren, S, Ihaya, K, Guillaume, G, Travaglino, GA, Rachev, NR, Hanusz, K, Pirko, M, West, JN, Cyrus-Lai, W, Najmussaqib, A, Romano, E, Noreika, V, Musliu, A, Sungailaite, E, Kosa, M, Lentoor, AG, Sinha, N, Bender, AR, Meshi, D, Bhandari, P, Byrne, G, Kalinova, K, Hubena, B, Ninaus, M, Diaz, C, Scarpaci, A, Koszalkowska, K, Pankowski, D, Yaneva, T, Morales-Izquierdo, S, Uzelac, E, Lee, Y, Hristova, D, Hakim, MA, Deschrijver, E, Kavanagh, PS, Shata, A, Reyna, C, De Leon, GA, Tisocco, F, Mola, DJ, Shani, M, Mahlungulu, S, Ozery, DH, Caniels, MCJ, Correa, PS, Ortiz, MV, Vilar, R, Makaveeva, T, Pummerer, L, Nikolova, I, Bujic, M, Szebeni, Z, Pennato, T, Taranu, M, Martinez, L, Capelos, T, Belaus, A, Dubrov, D, Lieberoth, A, Lin, S-Y, Stockli, S, Han, H, Kowal, M, Gelpi, R, Chrona, S, Tran, TP, Jeftic, A, Rasmussen, J, Cakal, H, Milfont, TL, Yamada, Y, Amin, R, Debove, S, Flis, I, Sahin, H, Turk, F, Yeh, Y-Y, Ho, YW, Sikka, P, Delgado-Garcia, G, Lacko, D, Mamede, S, Zerhouni, O, Tuominen, J, Bircan, T, Wang, AH-E, Ikizer, G, Lins, S, Studzinska, A, Uddin, MK, Juarez, FP-G, Chen, F-Y, Sanli, AM, Lys, AE, Reynoso-Alcantara, V, Flores Gonzalez, R, Griffin, AM, Lopez, CRC, Nezkusilova, J, Cepulic, D-B, Aquino, S, Marot, TA, Blackburn, AM, Boullu, L, Bavolar, J, Kacmar, P, Wu, CKS, Areias, JC, Natividade, JC, Mari, S, Ahmed, O, Dranseika, V, Cristofori, I, Coll-Martin, T, Eichel, K, Kumaga, R, Ermagan-Caglar, E, Bamwesigye, D, Tag, B, Contreras-Ibanez, CC, Aruta, JJBR, Naidu, PA, Dilekler, I, Cenek, J, Islam, MN, Ch'ng, B, Sechi, C, Nebel, S, Sayilan, G, Jha, S, Vestergren, S, Ihaya, K, Guillaume, G, Travaglino, GA, Rachev, NR, Hanusz, K, Pirko, M, West, JN, Cyrus-Lai, W, Najmussaqib, A, Romano, E, Noreika, V, Musliu, A, Sungailaite, E, Kosa, M, Lentoor, AG, Sinha, N, Bender, AR, Meshi, D, Bhandari, P, Byrne, G, Kalinova, K, Hubena, B, Ninaus, M, Diaz, C, Scarpaci, A, Koszalkowska, K, Pankowski, D, Yaneva, T, Morales-Izquierdo, S, Uzelac, E, Lee, Y, Hristova, D, Hakim, MA, Deschrijver, E, Kavanagh, PS, Shata, A, Reyna, C, De Leon, GA, Tisocco, F, Mola, DJ, Shani, M, Mahlungulu, S, Ozery, DH, Caniels, MCJ, Correa, PS, Ortiz, MV, Vilar, R, Makaveeva, T, Pummerer, L, Nikolova, I, Bujic, M, Szebeni, Z, Pennato, T, Taranu, M, Martinez, L, Capelos, T, Belaus, A, and Dubrov, D

Abstract

The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselv

Published
2021

3. Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: a systematic review

Author

Pavela Banai I, van Mulukom, Jakub Šrol, Lobato Ejc, Sinan Alper, Cameron S. Kay, Hui Bai, Gaëlle Marinthe, Zezelj I, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Farias Jem, Cavojova, and Pummerer L

Subjects
Inheritance (object-oriented programming), Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), DUAL (cognitive architecture), Psychology, Genealogy
Abstract

Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories can have severe consequences; it is therefore crucial to understand this phenomenon. We present a narrative synthesis of COVID-19 conspiracy belief research from 85 international articles, identified and appraised through a systematic review. We identify a number of significant antecedents of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs (individual differences, personality traits, demographic variables, attitudes, thinking styles and biases, group identity, trust in authorities, and social media use) and their consequences (protective behaviours, self-centred and misguided behaviours such as hoarding and pseudoscientific health practices, vaccination intentions, mental health, and other negative social consequences such as discrimination and violence). We conclude that understanding both the antecedents and consequences of conspiracy beliefs is highly important to tackle them, whether in the COVID-19 pandemic or future threats, such as that of climate change.

Published
2020

4. Public agreement with misinformation about wind farms.

Author

Winter K, Hornsey MJ, Pummerer L, and Sassenberg K

Subjects
Humans, Australia, United Kingdom, United States, Female, Male, Adult, Farms, Wind, Communication, Public Opinion
Abstract

Misinformation campaigns target wind farms, but levels of agreement with this misinformation among the broader public are unclear. Across six nationally quota-based samples in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia (total N = 6008), over a quarter of respondents agree with half or more of contrarian claims about wind farms. Agreement with diverse claims is highly correlated, suggesting an underlying belief system directed at wind farm rejection. Consistent with this, agreement is best predicted (positively) by a conspiracist worldview (i.e., the general tendency to believe in conspiracy theories; explained variance ΔR² = 0.11-0.20) and (negatively) by a pro-ecological worldview (ΔR² = 0.04-0.13). Exploratory analyses show that agreement with contrarian claims is associated with lower support for pro-wind policies and greater intentions to protest against wind farms. We conclude that wind farm contrarianism is a mainstream phenomenon, rooted in people's worldviews and that poses a challenge for communicators and institutions committed to accelerating the energy transition., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Conspiracy beliefs and majority influence.

Author

Pummerer L, Fock L, Winter K, and Sassenberg K

Abstract

Conspiracy beliefs (i.e. beliefs in specific conspiracy theories or the more general conspiracy mentality) are associated with a need for uniqueness and lower adherence to social norms. These findings suggest that conspiracy beliefs might be generally associated with less influence by majority opinions - absolutely and compared to minority opinions. In five experiments involving scenarios unrelated to conspiracy theories (overall N  = 1669), participants were informed about the majority/minority opinion on a given issue (e.g. the building of a tunnel), afterward indicating their evaluation or voting intentions regarding the issue. We then tested whether the influence of a majority/minority opinion on evaluation or voting intentions is moderated by conspiracy beliefs. Across studies, we find no significant moderation. A meta-analysis confirms no correlation between conspiracy beliefs and susceptibility to majority influence. Taken together, our studies provide no evidence for the assumption that those holding conspiracy beliefs reject majority opinions per se.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Let's stay in touch: Frequency (but not mode) of interaction between leaders and followers predicts better leadership outcomes.

Author

Wroblewski D, Scholl A, Ditrich L, Pummerer L, and Sassenberg K

Subjects
Cross-Sectional Studies, Motivation, Altruism, Leadership, Social Behavior
Abstract

Successful leadership requires leaders to make their followers aware of expectations regarding the goals to achieve, norms to follow, and task responsibilities to take over. This awareness is often achieved through leader-follower communication. In times of economic globalization and digitalization, however, leader-follower communication has become both more digitalized (virtual, rather than face-to-face) and less frequent, making successful leader-follower-communication more challenging. The current research tested in four studies (three preregistered) whether digitalization and frequency of interaction predict task-related leadership success. In one cross-sectional (Study 1, N = 200), one longitudinal (Study 2, N = 305), and one quasi-experimental study (Study 3, N = 178), as predicted, a higher frequency (but not a lower level of digitalization) of leader-follower interactions predicted better task-related leadership outcomes (i.e., stronger goal clarity, norm clarity, and task responsibility among followers). Via mediation and a causal chain approach, Study 3 and Study 4 (N = 261) further targeted the mechanism; results showed that the relationship between (higher) interaction frequency and these outcomes is due to followers perceiving more opportunities to share work-related information with the leaders. These results improve our understanding of contextual factors contributing to leadership success in collaborations across hierarchies. They highlight that it is not the digitalization but rather the frequency of interacting with their leader that predicts whether followers gain clarity about the relevant goals and norms to follow and the task responsibilities to assume., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2022 Wroblewski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Belief in conspiracy theories and non-normative behavior.

Author

Pummerer L

Subjects
Humans, Social Behavior Disorders, Trust psychology
Abstract

There are many examples of people believing in conspiracy theories showing non-normative behaviors. But why is this the case? The current contribution proposes that the non-normative behavior of people believing in conspiracy theories is a natural consequence of a different social reality that is associated with the belief in conspiracy theories. This social reality is characterized by a tendency for distinction and distrust in social relationships, a different perception of descriptive norms, a questioning of the injunctive norms regarding specific behaviors, lower trust in institutions and traditional authorities, as well as alternative norms among people believing in conspiracy theories., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Nothing declared., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Pro-vaccination subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions.

Author

Winter K, Pummerer L, Hornsey MJ, and Sassenberg K

Subjects
Attitude, Humans, Pandemics prevention & control, Surveys and Questionnaires, Intention, Vaccination
Abstract

Objectives: Increasing vaccination hesitancy threatens societies' capacity to contain pandemics and other diseases. One factor that is positively associated with vaccination intentions is a supportive subjective norm (i.e., the perception that close others approve of vaccination). On the downside, there is evidence that negative attitudes toward vaccinations are partly rooted in conspiracy mentality (i.e., the tendency to believe in conspiracies). The objective of this study is to examine the role of subjective norms in moderating the association between conspiracy mentality and vaccine hesitancy. We examined two competing predictions: Are those high in conspiracy mentality immune to subjective norms, or do subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions?, Methods: We conducted five studies (total N = 1,280) to test these hypotheses across several vaccination contexts (some real, some fictitious). We measured conspiracy mentality, vaccination intentions, subjective norms, attitudes toward vaccination, and perceived behavioural control., Results: A merged analysis across the studies revealed an interaction effect of conspiracy mentality and subjective norm on vaccination intentions. When subjective norm was high (i.e., when participants perceived that close others approved of vaccines) conspiracy mentality no longer predicted vaccination intentions. This was consistent with the moderating hypothesis of subjective norms and inconsistent with the immunity hypothesis., Conclusions: The typical negative relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions is eliminated among those who perceive pro-vaccination subjective norms. Although correlational, these data raise the possibility that pro-vaccination views of friends and family can be leveraged to reduce vaccine hesitancy., (© 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results