Search

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has emerged as a global pandemic that upended existing protocols and practices, including those for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Here, we describe the successful clinical course and multiple key interventions administered to an acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient, who tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on day −1 of matched unrelated donor (SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G negative) T-cell-replete HCT. This experience allowed for implementing a virologic and immunomonitoring panel to characterize the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the recipient’s nascent humoral and cellular immune response. The finding of robust, functional, and persistent levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, starting early after transplant was unexpected, and in combination with the clinical strategy, may have contributed to the favorable outcome. Additionally, it is plausible that preexisting cross-reactive endemic coronavirus immunity in the allogeneic graft reduced recipient susceptibility to COVID-19 disease. This case supports the critical role that T-cell responses may play in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in the context of transplant immunosuppression, in which reconstitution of humoral response is commonly delayed. Interventional approaches to transfer SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immunity such as HCT donor vaccination and adaptive cellular therapy could be of benefit.

Background Pneumonia is the most common infectious cause of morbidity and excess mortality complicating hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and treatment of hematologic malignancy. Standard bronchoscopic and noninvasive microbiologic testing identify causative pathogens in less than half of cases. The Karius Test, a plasma next-generation sequencing assay of microbial cell-free DNA, may improve diagnostic yield in these patients. Methods Patients with active hematologic malignancy or recent HCT undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected pneumonia were prospectively enrolled in this observational study conducted at 10 United States medical centers. A panel of expert clinicians blinded to Karius Test results reviewed a standardized panel of microbiologic and molecular testing from bronchoalveolar lavage and blood samples for bacterial and fungal testing, nasopharyngeal swab for respiratory viral testing, imaging results, clinical documentation, and any additional microbiologic or molecular testing collected per usual standard of care to adjudicate a probable cause of pneumonia. The panel then adjudicated whether a probable cause of pneumonia or other clinically relevant infection was identified by the Karius Test. Results Between January 3, 2020 and February 4, 2022, 257 patients were enrolled. A planned interim analysis of the first 69 sequentially enrolled patients in the per protocol population was conducted. An adjudicated probable cause of pneumonia was identified by standard care in 18/69 (26%) patients. The Karius Test identified an adjudicated probable cause of pneumonia in 10/51 (20%) patients when no cause of pneumonia was identified by standard care testing. The combination of standard care and the Karius Test together identified a probable cause of pneumonia in 28/69 (41%) patients. At least one additional pathogen adjudicated as a probable cause of pneumonia was identified by the Karius Test in 6/18 (33%) of patients with positive standard care testing. Conclusion The Karius Test notably increased the probability of identifying a pathogenic cause of pneumonia among immunocompromised patients undergoing bronchoscopy. The additive diagnostic value of the Karius Test may significantly enhance management of this common condition. Disclosures Roy F. Chemaly, MD/MPH, Karius: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Grant/Research Support Radha Duttagupta, PhD, Karius Inc: Stocks/Bonds Sanjeet S. Dadwal, MD, FACP, FIDSA, AlloVir: Advisor/Consultant|AlloVir: Grant/Research Support|Ansun Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Aseptiscope: Advisor/Consultant|Aseptiscope: Stocks/Bonds|Astellas: Speaker's Bureau|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Karius: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Speaker's Bureau|Takeda: Speaker's Bureau Joshua A. Hill, MD, Allovir: Advisor/Consultant|Allovir: Grant/Research Support|Covance/CSL: Advisor/Consultant|CRISPR: Advisor/Consultant|Deverra: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Karius: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Octapharma: Advisor/Consultant|OptumHealth: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Immunotec: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Symbio: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant Ghady Haidar, MD, Karius, Allovir, and AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support Alfred Luk, MD, Karius: Grant/Research Support Jamie Todd, MD, Altavant Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|Boehringer Ingelheim: Grant/Research Support|CareDx: Grant/Research Support|Cellarity: Advisor/Consultant|Natera: Advisor/Consultant Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD, AlloVir: Board Member|AlloVir: Serve as member of DSMC|Amplyx: Board Member|Amplyx: Serve as member of DSMC|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|CSL Behring: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Investigator for Merck|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Board Member|Octapharma: Serve as EAC member|Partners RX: Advisor/Consultant|SymBio: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Investigator for Takeda|Vera: Board Member|Vera: Serve as member of DSMC Elena Nemirovich-Danchenko, MD PhD, Karius: Stocks/Bonds Mona Mughar, BS, Karius: Stocks/Bonds Sudeb Dalai, MD, Karius: Stocks/Bonds Sudeb Dalai, MD, Karius: Stocks/Bonds Yuen Cho, MS, CLS(CA-DPH), Karius: Stocks/Bonds Asim A. Ahmed, MD, Karius: Employee|Karius: Stocks/Bonds Desiree Hollemon, MSN, MPH, Karius: Stocks/Bonds David K. Hong, MD, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Marla Lay Vaughn, BS, MT(ASCP), Karius: Employee|Karius: Stocks/Bonds Tim Blauwkamp, PhD, Karius: Board Member|Karius: Ownership Interest Zivjena Vucetic, MD, Karius: Stocks/Bonds Rina Romano, BS, Karius Inc: Stocks/Bonds|Karius Inc: Stocks/Bonds Rina Romano, BS, Karius Inc: Stocks/Bonds|Karius Inc: Stocks/Bonds Rina Romano, BS, Karius Inc: Stocks/Bonds|Karius Inc: Stocks/Bonds Vance G. Fowler, Jr, MD, MHS, Affinergy: Grant/Research Support|Affinergy: Honoraria|Affinium: Honoraria|Amphliphi Biosciences: Honoraria|ArcBio: Stocks/Bonds|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Honoraria|Bayer: Honoraria|C3J: Honoraria|Cerexa/Forest/Actavis/Allergan: Grant/Research Support|Contrafect: Grant/Research Support|Contrafect: Honoraria|Cubist/Merck: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm: Grant/Research Support|Deep Blue: Grant/Research Support|Destiny: Honoraria|Genentech: Grant/Research Support|Genentech: Honoraria|Integrated Biotherapeutics: Honoraria|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Honoraria|Karius: Grant/Research Support|Medicines Co.: Honoraria|MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|MedImmune: Honoraria|NIH: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Honoraria|Sepsis diagnostics: Sepsis diagnostics patent pending|UpToDate: Royalties|Valanbio: Stocks/Bonds Thomas L. Holland, MD, Aridis: Advisor/Consultant|Lysovant: Advisor/Consultant.

Histoplasmosis-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a rate but lethal disease in immunocompromised hosts. Unusual clinical presentations make diagnosing invasive fungal infection even more challenging. Here we present a case of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis secondary to progressive disseminated histoplasmosis presenting as cellulitis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematous. A high index of suspicion combined with histopathology and molecular diagnostic techniques are important to establish an accurate and timely diagnosis of opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant reductions in transplantation, motivated in part by concerns of disproportionately more severe disease among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, clinical features, outcomes, and predictors of mortality in SOT recipients are not well described. Methods We performed a multicenter cohort study of SOT recipients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Data were collected using standardized intake and 28-day follow-up electronic case report forms. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the primary endpoint, 28-day mortality, among hospitalized patients. Results Four hundred eighty-two SOT recipients from >50 transplant centers were included: 318 (66%) kidney or kidney/pancreas, 73 (15.1%) liver, 57 (11.8%) heart, and 30 (6.2%) lung. Median age was 58 (interquartile range [IQR] 46–57), median time post-transplant was 5 years (IQR 2–10), 61% were male, and 92% had ≥1 underlying comorbidity. Among those hospitalized (376 [78%]), 117 (31%) required mechanical ventilation, and 77 (20.5%) died by 28 days after diagnosis. Specific underlying comorbidities (age >65 [adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7–5.5, P Conclusions Mortality among SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 was 20.5%. Age and underlying comorbidities rather than immunosuppression intensity-related measures were major drivers of mortality.

Background Heart transplantation is a life-saving procedure that has seen improvements in transplant and patient outcomes due to advances in immunosuppression and prevention of posttransplantation infectious episodes (IEps). This study systematically evaluates IEps in the modern era of heart transplantation at Stanford University Medical Center. Methods This is a single-center retrospective review that includes 279 consecutive adult heart transplantation recipients from January 2008 to September 2017. Baseline demographic, clinical, serological, and outcomes information were collected. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to assess survival stratified by IEp occurrence within the first year. Results A total of 600 IEps occurred in 279 patients (2.15 IEps per patient) during a median follow-up period of 3 years. Overall survival was 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.2-88.4) at 1 year posttransplantation for those with any IEp compared with 93.0% (95% CI, 87.2-96.4) in those without IEp (P = 0.07). Bacterial IEps were the most common (n = 375; 62.5%), followed by viral (n = 180; 30.0%), fungal (n = 40; 6.7%), and parasitic (n = 5; 0.8%). IEps by Gram-negative bacteria (n = 210) outnumbered those by Gram-positive bacteria (n = 142). Compared with prior studies from our center, there was a decreased proportion of viral (including cytomegalovirus), fungal (including Aspergillus spp. and non-Aspergillus spp. molds), and Nocardia infections. There were no IEps due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii, or Toxoplasma gondii. Conclusions A significant reduction in viral, fungal, and Nocardia IEps after heart transplantation was observed, most likely due to advancements in immunosuppression and preventive strategies, including pretransplant infectious diseases screening and antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 has declined over the course of the pandemic. Mortality trends specifically in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are unknown. Using data from a multicenter registry of SOTR hospitalized for COVID-19, we compared 28-day mortality between early 2020 (March 1, 2020-June 19, 2020) and late 2020 (June 20, 2020-December 31, 2020). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess comorbidity-adjusted mortality. Time period of diagnosis was available for 1435/1616 (88.8%) SOTR and 971/1435 (67.7%) were hospitalized: 571/753 (75.8%) in early 2020 and 402/682 (58.9%) in late 2020 (p&nbsp

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is common among recipients of heart transplantation (HTx) but its impact on clinical outcomes is unclear. We evaluated the associations between pretransplant DM and posttransplant DM (PTDM) and outcomes among adults receiving HTx at a single center.We performed a retrospective study (range 01/2008 - 07/2018), n = 244. The primary outcome was survival; secondary outcomes included acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, infection requiring hospitalization, macrovascular events, and dialysis initiation post-transplant. Comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses.Pretransplant DM was present in 75 (30.7%) patients and was associated with a higher risk for infection requiring hospitalization (p 0.05), but not with survival or other outcomes. Among the 144 patients without pretransplant DM surviving to 1 year, 29 (20.1%) were diagnosed with PTDM at the 1-year follow-up. After multivariable adjustment, PTDM diagnosis at 1-year remained associated with worse subsequent survival (hazard ratio 2.72, 95% confidence interval 1.03-7.16). Predictors of PTDM at 1-year included cytomegalovirus seropositivity and higher prednisone dose ( 5 mg/day) at 1-year follow-up.Compared to HTx recipients without baseline DM, those with baseline DM have a higher risk for infections requiring hospitalization, and those who develop DM after HTx have worse survival.

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a serious fungal infection that primarily affects patients with prolonged and profound neutropenia, and compromised cell-mediated immunity. Aspergillosis of the oesophagus and gastrointestinal tract is uncommon but seen in advanced cases of disseminated IA. However, it is difficult to diagnose antemortem due to the poor specificity of the symptoms and the absence of characteristic imaging findings. Therefore, the reported cases of gastrointestinal aspergillosis have been associated with high morbidity and mortality, and frequently diagnosed postmortem. Here we present a successful outcome in a patient with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had presented with febrile neutropenia, cough and dysphagia, and was diagnosed with disseminated IA comprising of pulmonary and oesophageal involvement. This case highlights the need for a high index of suspicion and the importance of invasive procedures for histopathology and molecular diagnostics to ensure an early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.

Advances in solid organ transplantation have improved the survival of end-stage organ disease at the expense of an increased risk for opportunistic infections. Unusual clinical presentations and the possibility of concurrent infections make diagnosing invasive fungal infection (IFI) more difficult. Here, we present a case of simultaneous vertebral infection caused by Coccidioides immitis-posadasii and subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis due to Nigrograna mackinnonii in a kidney transplant recipient. The diagnosis of both infections required invasive procedures to obtain tissue and a high index of suspicion that more than one IFI could be present. A multidisciplinary team approach for the management of immunocompromised patients with suspected or diagnosed IFI is warranted.

Invasive Klebsiella pneumoniae Liver Abscess. A Worldwide Emerging Disease.

Background: In November 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued emergency use authorization (EUA) for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk for disease progression. These mAbs reduce the risk of hospitalization in the general population. However, its efficacy and safety in immunocompromised hematology patients are not known. Methods: From November 9th, 2020, until February 28th, 2021, all adult hematology patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease who received monoclonal antibodies within 10 days of symptoms onset were included. Patients who were asymptomatic, had severe or critical COVID-19 disease, or were hospitalized at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis were excluded. Baseline demographic, clinical outcomes, and hematologic-related data were extracted. All statistical analysis was performed using SAS statistical software. Results: Thirty-eight hematology patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease who received mAb therapy under EUA were included in this study. Thirty (79%) patients received bamlanivimab and 8 (21%) casirivimab-imdevimab. Baseline characteristics prior to mAB administration include: 53% female, median age of 51 years (range: 21-80), with 18% above 65 years old. Twenty-eight (74%) patients received cellular therapy: 18 (47%) had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), 9 (24%) autologous HCT, and 1 (3%) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy. Among the 17 patients who had COVID-19 disease after HCT, the median time to COVID-19 diagnosis was 22.8 months (range: 2.6-274.4) from HCT to COVID-19 diagnosis. Twelve out of 17 (71%) alloHCT patients were being managed for active graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis (chronic GVHD: n=11 [mild: 4, moderate: 4, severe: 3], acute GVHD (grade 2): n=1). Ten (59%) alloHCT patients were on immunosuppressant therapy at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. Fifteen (39%) patients were on active treatment for their hematologic malignancy (HM) at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis with a mean of 3 previous lines of treatment (range: 1-6). Additional patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. mAb therapy under EUA was well tolerated in this patient population with only 1 (3%) patient having experienced an adverse reaction characterized as headache. Four (11%) patients were hospitalized due to COVID-19, and 2 (5%) progressed to severe disease. All four patients had received bamlanivimab. The median time for hospitalization from diagnosis of COVID-19 to admission date was 8 days (range: 1-20) while median time from mAB infusion to hospitalization was 7.5 days (range: 0-17). One patient (3%) died within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis; the cause of death was COVID-19 disease. Most patients (n=34, 89%) ultimately tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR after mAb infusion. 34% of patients (n=13) cleared the virus within 2 weeks of receiving mAb infsuion. The median time to clearance of viral shedding was 25.5 days (range: 7-138). After mAb infusion, most patients (10/15; 67%) who were previously on active treatment for HM prior to diagnosis of COVID-19 resumed therapy for their HM with a median delay of 21.5 days (range: 12-42). We observed a significant difference in hospitalization was amongst patients who received a HCT vs. non-HCT (0%, 0/26 and 36%, 4/11 respectively; p Conclusion: This study demonstrates that SARS-COV2 specific mAb use in malignant hematology patients under EUA was safe and may reduce hospitalization as reported in the literature amongst those at high risk for disease progression. Thus, the access to SARS-COV2 mAb in this population who is at increased risk for complications from SARS-COV2 infection is critical in reducing progression to severe COVID-19 disease and hospitalization. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ali: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Aribi: Seagen: Consultancy. Artz: Radiology Partners: Other: Spouse has equity interest in Radiology Partners, a private radiology physician practice. Koller: Novartis: Consultancy. Nikolaenko: Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Shouse: Beigene: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau. Marcucci: Abbvie: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Novartis: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Agios: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings. Forman: Mustang Bio: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Lixte Biotechnology: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Allogene: Consultancy. Dadwal: AlloVir: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Aseptiscope: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Investigator; Karius: Other: Investigator. Al Malki: CareDx: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy.

Background In patients (pts) with cancer, the risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a function of dose and duration of corticosteroids (CS), underlying immunodeficiency, and immunosuppressive drugs. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) and atovaquone (ATO) are effective prophylaxis (ppx) agents against PJP. Guidelines recommend PJP ppx for pts on > 20 mg /day of prednisone or its equivalent for ≥ 1 month. A best practice alert (BPA) to identify pts receiving CS may assist with improving PJP ppx prescribing in cancer pts. Methods PJP BPA was created to identify pts on CS (excluding hydrocortisone) with no active prescription for TMP/SMX or ATO ppx in EMR. Dapsone and pentamidine excluded since not preferred agents at our institution. PJP case: positive PJP polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) > 84 copies or positive PJP direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) or cytology with clinical and radiographic suspicion. PJP PCR from BAL < 84 copies/ml with negative DFA and cytology excluded. Preventable PJP (P-PJP): pts after CS > = 30 days without PJP ppx. Non-preventable PJP (NP-PJP) : pts after CS < 30 consecutive days, or on PJP ppx (non-compliance, failure), or day +1 to +30 post hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Pre-intervention (pre-i) PJP pts 3/1/2018 to 7/31/19 (17 months), post-intervention (post-i) PJP pts 8/1/19 to 2/1/20 (18 months) evaluated to assess BPA impact on PJP inpatient (inpt) admissions. Results In the post-i, the BPA fired 3,588 times in 1,302 pts. Pre-i: 20 P-PJP, 13 NP-PJP out of 33 pts. Post-i: 6 P-PJP, 25 NP-PJP out of 31 pts. The BPA fired in 4/31 PJP pts in the post-i period: 2/6 of P-PJP, 2/25 NP-PJP. The number of P-PJP decreased from 20 to 6 in the post-i period (p=0.0097). Conclusion Implementation of a decision support tool significantly decreased the number of P-PJP. The BPA was limited by identifying pts after CS were prescribed after the initial visit leading to periods of CS use without ppx and inability to calculate CS dosing and length of prescription. BPA provided passive education in the outpatient setting and future opportunities include refining the EMR to better identify pts at risk for developing PJP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures