Search

Purpose: This literature review aims to present evidence‐based clinical recommendations for the eight most debated topics related to perioperative management in total knee arthroplasty: counselling, prehabilitation, transfusion risk, tranexamic acid, drainage, analgesia, urinary catheter and compression stockings. Methods: A multidisciplinary team conducted a systematic review on these topics. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines for the literature review and result presentation. The research encompassed articles from 1 January 2009 to 28 February 2023, retrieved through the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Embase database and Cochrane Library. Results: Forty‐five articles were selected. Preoperative counselling has limited evidence for its impact on postoperative outcomes; yet, it can help alleviate surgery‐related anxiety and manage postoperative symptoms. Prehabilitation can also prepare patients for surgery, reducing hospital stays and improving postsurgery functionality. Numerous studies suggest that preoperative Hb levels are independently linked to transfusion risk, with a recommended level of 13 g/dL. Combining intravenous and local tranexamic acid administration is strongly advised to reduce perioperative blood loss, while drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty offers no functional advantages. Employing a multimodal analgesia approach yields better results with reduced opioid usage. Indwelling urinary catheters provide no benefit and avoiding them can lower the risk of urinary tract infections. As for compression stockings, there is insufficient evidence in the literature to support their efficacy in preventing venous thromboembolism. Conclusion: The best‐track protocol has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing hospitalisation time and perioperative/postoperative complications. It is success relies on a collaborative, resource‐adaptive approach led by a multidisciplinary team. Both patients and hospitals benefit from this approach, as it enhances care quality and lowers costs. Several studies have highlighted the significance of a patient‐centred approach in achieving high‐quality care. Creating a novel treatment protocol could be a prospective goal in the near future. Level of Evidence: Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: During the last decades, spine surgery has grown exponentially. In spite of that, it remains a surgical specialty without a well-defined own certification. It is usually carried out, separately, by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, even if there is an overlapping of competence and skills. Materials and Methods: In our hospital, from January 2019, a systematic protocol called integrated spine trauma team protocol (ISTTP) was implemented to improve the management of traumatic spinal injuries in a multidisciplinary way. It is characterized by a specific algorithm from diagnosis to postoperative care. According to the new protocol, orthopedic spinal surgeons and neurosurgeons work together as an integrated spine trauma team. The authors analyzed, retrospectively, the results obtained by comparing patients treated before and after the application of the ISTTP. Results: The new protocol allowed a statistically significant reduction in waiting time before surgery and complication rate. Moreover, early discharge of patients was recorded. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that described a specific algorithm for a standardized multidisciplinary management of the spinal trauma with combined orthopedic and neurosurgeon expertise. Conclusion: Our preliminary results suggest that the application of our ISTTP leads to better results for treating traumatic spinal injury (TSI). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluates the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated with in situ fixation, focusing on medium to long-term outcomes and quality of life. Its primary goal is to establish a subjective well-being cutoff, using subjective methods and the iHOT33 scale, for assessing patients in future studies. Additionally, it explores functionality differences between mild and moderate-severe SCFE, case series epidemiology and potential complications. A retrospective analysis of 63 patients (73 hips), treated for SCFE between 2000 and 2017 at our facility using in situ fixation, was conducted. These patients underwent clinical, anamnestic, and radiological assessments, with PASS determined based on iHOT33 questionnaire results and statistical analysis. The mean age at surgery was 12.95 years (±1.64, range 9-17), with an average follow-up of 11 years (±4.60, range 5-20). At follow-up, 87% of patients reported achieving PASS, with higher iHOT33 scores correlating to PASS. A cutoff of >68 on the iHOT33 scale showed strong predictive ability for assessing PASS (area under the curve 0.857, 88.89% sensitivity, 79.69% specificity). The findings indicate that 87% of patients achieved PASS at medium to long-term follow-up, with better clinical function than those who did not report PASS. The iHOT33 scale's effectiveness in predicting PASS, especially with a cutoff of >68, suggests this method's efficacy. Given these positive outcomes, including in moderate-severe cases treated with in situ fixation, this approach is considered a viable therapeutic option., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)