A protein containing a sensor input domain and a functional output domain is described as a one-component system (Ulrich et al. 2005). Signal transduction in prokaryotes is dominated by such systems, where small molecule-binding domains constitute the majority of the input domains and helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding domains are the most common output domains (Ulrich et al. 2005). Based on sequence similarity, predominantly in the DNA binding domain one-component systems identified in sequenced genomes are assembled into protein families usually named after the best-characterized member. Some of the largest such families (Perez-Rueda et al. 2004) are the LysR (Henikoff et al. 1988), TetR (Ramos et al. 2005), IclR (Nasser et al. 1994), GntR (Haydon and Guest 1991), and AraC (Gallegos et al. 1997) superfamilies. With extensive sequence similarity in the DNA-binding domain, these large families often contain proteins with different types of the effector domains fused to similar DNA-binding domains (Rosinski and Atchley 1999; Perez-Rueda and Collado-Vides 2000). This is true for the GntR family of transcriptional regulators, which gathers close to 2000 members in both bacterial and archael genomes (Haydon and Guest 1991; Rigali et al. 2002). The proteins in the GntR family share a characteristic version of the N-terminal winged helix-turn-helix (wHTH) DNA-binding domain. This output domain is coupled with the C-terminal signaling domain responding to a range of stimuli in the form of different small molecules. Recent sequence analysis of the GntR proteins revealed the presence of several distinct groups with different types of the C-terminal signaling domains (Rigali et al. 2002). According to this analysis, the GntR family has been divided into four major subfamilies, FadR, HutC, MocR, and YtrA, where each subfamily is categorized by a specific type of the C-terminal domain. While the structure of FadR alone and in complex with its effector and operator DNA has been recently determined (van Aalten et al. 2000, 2001; Xu et al. 2001), no structural information is available for the other three subfamilies of GntR-like regulators. The HutC subfamily represents more then 30% of all GntR members. It had been named after the HutC regulator from Pseudomonas putida, which represses the expression of histidine utilization genes and is, in turn, inactivated by the binding of uroconate (Allison and Phillips 1990). Other characterized members of the HutC family include FarR from Escherichia coli, which regulates the expression of citric acid cycle genes and responds to long-chain fatty acids (Quail et al. 1994), the trehalose operon repressor TreR from Bacillus subtilis that is inhibited by trehalose-6-phosphate (Schock and Dahl 1996), and a number of proteins (KorSA, KorA, and TraR) that are repressors of the genes involved in conjugative plasmid transfer in Streptomyces species (Kendall and Cohen 1988; Hagege et al. 1993; Kataoka et al. 1994). PhnF from Escherichia coli, which is the focus of this article, belongs to the phn operon that is involved in transport and biodegradation of phosphonates, (Pn)-compounds having carbon–phosphorous (C–P) bonds (Metcalf and Wanner 1993). Based on its sequence similarity to the HutC proteins, PhnF is predicted to regulate the expression of the phn genes and respond to alkylphosphonates. However, its specific regulatory function, its ligand, or the operator sites have not yet been established. A project was undertaken aimed at obtaining structural information on the HutC subfamily ligand-binding domain using X-ray crystallography. In order to increase the chance of successful expression, purification, and crystallization of this protein, only the C-terminal ligand-binding domain, defined by bioinformatics analysis, was included.