Search

Background: Inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway activation may hinder the occurrence and progression of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PI3K/AKT inhibitors and determine the most appropriate inhibitor for different cancer types., Methods: Electronic databases up to June 2024 were used to examine the efficacy and safety of PI3K inhibitors (alpelisib, copanlisib, duvelisib, and idelalisib) and AKT inhibitors (capivasertib, ipatasertib and MK-2206) for the treatment of cancer. Data was assessed with a random-effect pairwise and network meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies were eligible if they compared PI3K or AKT inhibitors with non-PI3K/AKT controls with no restriction., Results: The results were based on 34 studies from 34 published articles and 6 online registration trials (6710 patients). According to pairwise meta-analysis, PI3K/AKT inhibitors showed to be highly effective, especially for treating mutant cancers, but had poor safety profiles. According to our network meta-analysis, PI3K/AKT inhibitors, especially the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, are effective for treating solid cancers such as breast cancer (BC). Moreover, PI3K inhibitors, especially idelalisib, were effective for treating hematologic cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)., Conclusions: The PI3K/AKT inhibitors are effective in patients with genetic mutations. For solid cancers such as BC, capivasertib was efficacy and safety. For hematological cancers represented by CLL, idelalisib was efficacy and safety. The above studies can be used when recommending appropriate targeted therapies for patients with different cancer types., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and EGFR-TKI combination treatments have become the standard first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the best option has yet to be determined. This study compares the efficacy and safety of various first-line EGFR-TKI monotherapies and combination treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC., Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials databases, and several international conferences to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on first-line EGFR-TKI treatments for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The study quality was assessed using the revised tool for risk of bias in randomized trials. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the included treatments were compared by network meta-analysis based on a frequentist approach., Results: We identified 26 trials (8,359 patients) investigating 14 treatment groups, including first, second, and third-generation EGFR-TKIs and their combination treatments. Osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab showed the highest efficacy in improving progression-free survival. New third-generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated comparable efficacy to osimertinib alone but did not surpass it. Subgroup analyses revealed slight variation in treatment efficacy based on mutation types and patient demographics. Combination treatments were associated with a higher incidence of adverse events., Conclusion: These results reveal that osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab are superior first-line options for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, these combinations are associated with higher adverse event rates., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Asciminib is a myristoyl site BCR::ABL1 inhibitor approved for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) failing ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group conducted the Asciminib Evaluation in Newly Diagnosed CML study to assess efficacy of asciminib for newly diagnosed CP-CML. Patients commenced asciminib 40 mg twice daily. Patients with treatment failure, defined as BCR::ABL1 of >10% at 3 or 6 months, or >1% at 12 or 18 months, received either imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib in addition to asciminib. In patients with suboptimal response, defined as levels of 1% to 10% at 6 months, >0.1% to 1% at 12 months, or >0.01% to 1% at 18 months, the asciminib dose was increased to 80 mg twice daily. With a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 0-36), 82 of 101 patients continue asciminib. Most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (6%), loss of response (4%), and withdrawn consent (5%). There were no deaths; 1 patient developed lymphoid blast crisis. The coprimary end points were early molecular response (BCR::ABL1 of ≤10% at 3 months), achieved in 93% (96% confidence interval [CI], 86-97%), and major molecular response by 12 months achieved in 79%; (95% CI, 70-87%), respectively. Cumulative incidence of molecular response 4.5 was 53% by 24 months. One patient had 2 cerebrovascular events; no other arterial occlusive events were reported. Asciminib as frontline CP-CML therapy leads to high rates of molecular response with excellent tolerance and a low rate of discontinuation for toxicity. This trial was registered at https://www.anzctr.org.au/ as #ACTRN12620000851965., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Tofacitinib is a targeted JAK inhibitor used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Despite some recent safety concerns, it is considered effective and safe with appropriate patient selection. Between May 2015 and May 2024, data were retrospectively analyzed from 112 patients with a diagnosis of RA in a tertiary care hospital who had received tofacitinib for at least 1 month, with or without prior biologic DMARDs. The mean disease duration was 12 years, and the median duration of tofacitinib use was 32.5 months. The p-value for all disease activity parameters evaluated for effectiveness between the 1st- and 3rd-month visits was <0.001, except CRP (p = 0.097). Adverse events occurred in 15 (13.4%) patients, with an incidence rate of 4.54 per 100 patient-years. Observed were one myocardial infarction (0.3/100 patient-years), two pulmonary embolisms (0.6/100 patient-years), three herpes zoster (HZ) (0.9/100 patient-years), and one basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (0.3/100 patient-years). Median drug-free survival was 68 (95% CI: 54.8-81.2) months. The drug was discontinued in 28 (25%) patients due to ineffectiveness and in 13 (11.6%) due to side effects. A significant difference in drug survival rates was observed between patients who had not previously used bDMARDs and those who had received at least one bDMARD before tofacitinib (p < 0.001). Drug survival was 46.35 months in the prior bDMARD group and 71.09 months in the bDMARD-naive group. This study found significant reductions in disease activity indices at 3 and 6 months after starting tofacitinib, with sustained effectiveness. Although adverse event rates were somewhat higher than reported in the literature, tofacitinib can be used effectively and safely in appropriate patient populations for RA treatment., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

For many new oncological drugs, including target therapy and immunotherapy, the treatment should be continued as long as the patient is deriving clinical benefit from therapy or until unacceptable toxicity occurs. Drug survival or Time to treatment discontinuation (Ttd) or persistence have become important intermediate efficacy endpoints, especially in real-world settings due to their strong correlation with endpoints such as Time to treatment failure (Ttf) and Progression free survival (Pfs). Our methodology is based on validated indicators and information technology tools, to develop continuous and updated oncology drug utilization reports in hospital setting which include data about enrolment curves, Ttd, adherence, dose intensity, dose changes and budget impact. We present, as real-world example, the case of anti-EGFR in first line NSCLC. We analysed data of first and second generation drugs (afatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib) and the new third generation drug (osimertinib). Median Ttd and adherence as Proportion of days covered (Pdc) were respectively 11.6 versus 23.4 months and 0.92 versus 0.95.

With the availability of BCR::ABL1 targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), outcomes for most individuals with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) are outstanding, with life expectancy similar to age-matched peers. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) impair quality of life and many patients struggle with low-level chronic AEs, which for some individuals impact emotional well-being as well as social and work functioning. An emerging body of data supports that many TEAEs are related to therapy dose and can improve with dose reduction. However, it is critical that dose reductions do not alter current outcomes, especially in the rare patients who are at greater risk of losing response or transforming to acute leukemia. Organizations including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have begun to address when dose reductions may be considered in patients with CP-CML. In this manuscript, we review retrospective and prospective data reporting outcomes in patients after dose reduction and review data supporting lower dose preemptive dosing in first-line and later-line therapy. Switching therapy for intolerance can result in improvements in symptoms and limit toxicity, but other TEAEs may occur. Additionally, emerging therapeutics such as the new class of BCR::ABL1 allosteric inhibitors are under evaluation with a goal of improving tolerability. However, with many TKIs on the cusp of becoming generic, dose reduction becomes an appealing and important cost-effective strategy to minimize TEAEs and improve quality of life while preserving outstanding outcomes in CP-CML.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a potential therapeutic target for allergic and autoimmune diseases. This first-in-human phase I study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of sofnobrutinib (formerly AS-0871), a highly selective, orally available, non-covalent BTK inhibitor, in healthy adult subjects. Single ascending doses (SAD; 5-900 mg) and multiple ascending doses (MAD; 50-300 mg twice daily [b.i.d.] for 14 days [morning dose only on Day 14]) of sofnobrutinib were tested. In the entire study, all adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate, and no apparent dose-proportional trend in severity or frequency was observed. No serious treatment-emergent AEs, cardiac arrythmias, or bleeding-related AEs were reported. In the SAD part, sofnobrutinib exhibited approximately dose-dependent systemic exposures up to 900 mg with rapid absorption (median time to maximum concentration of 2.50-4.00 h) and gradual decline (mean half-lives of 3.7-9.0 h). In the MAD part, sofnobrutinib showed low accumulation after multiple dosing (mean accumulation ratios of ≤1.54) and reached a steady state on ≤Day 7. Single dosing of sofnobrutinib rapidly and dose-dependently suppressed basophil and B-cell activations in ex vivo whole blood assays. Multiple dosing of sofnobrutinib achieved 50.8%-79.4%, 67.6%-93.6%, and 90.1%-98.0% inhibition of basophil activation during the dosing interval of 50, 150, and 300 mg b.i.d., respectively. Based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis, half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) of sofnobrutinib for basophil activation was 54.06 and 57.01 ng/mL in the SAD and MAD parts, respectively. Similarly, IC 50 for B-cell activation was 187.21 ng/mL. These data support further investigation of sofnobrutinib in allergic and autoimmune diseases., (© 2024 Carna Biosciences, Inc. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

SKLB1028 is a novel multi-target protein kinase inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of FLT3-ITD mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Based on the preclinical characterization of SKLB1028 metabolism, three drug-drug interaction clinical studies were performed to investigate the effects of itraconazole, rifampin (CYP3A4 inhibitor and inducer, respectively), and gemfibrozil (CYP2C8 inhibitor) on the metabolism of SKLB1028. Fourteen healthy Chinese male subjects were enrolled in each study. In Study 1, subjects were administered a single dose of SKLB1028 (100 mg on days 1 and 11) and multiple doses of itraconazole (200 mg twice daily on day 8 and 200 mg once daily from days 9 to 18). Itraconazole was given with a loading dose on Day 8 and the total administration of itraconazole was 11 days. In Study 2, subjects were administered a single dose of SKLB1028 (100 mg on days 1 and 12) and multiple doses of gemfibrozil (600 mg twice daily from days 8 to 19). In Study 3, subjects were administered a single dose of SKLB1028 (150 mg on days 1 and 15) and multiple doses of rifampin (600 mg once daily from day 8 to 22). Itraconazole increased the AUC and C max of SKLB1028 by approximately 28% and 41%, respectively. Compared to the single drug, co-administration with gemfibrozil increased the AUC of SKLB1028 by ~26% and the C max by ~21%. Co-administration with rifampin reduced the AUC of SKLB1028 by ~30%, while the C max did not change significantly. All treatments were well tolerated in all three studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Skin cancer, notably melanoma, poses a significant global health burden, with rising incidence and mortality rates. While therapeutic advancements have improved outcomes, metastatic melanoma remains challenging to treat. This study aims to systematically review systemic treatment options for advanced melanoma, focusing on efficacy and safety in the first-line setting. Through a comprehensive search and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials conducted from 2013 to 2023, 11 studies encompassing 2816 participants were analyzed. Treatment options included BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib), MEK inhibitors (trametinib, cobimetinib), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab). Combined therapy with vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and ipilimumab demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to monotherapy, with a significant odds ratio (OR) of 6.95 (95% CI: 4.25-9.64, p < 0.00001) for OS and 2.49 (95% CI: 1.42-3.56, p < 0.00001) for PFS. Additionally, dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy showed improved outcomes with favorable tolerability, including a significant reduction in adverse event (AE) risk, with an OR of 2.20 (95% CI: 1.72-2.81). Furthermore, our analysis highlighted vemurafenib-associated dermatological toxicities, emphasizing the need for effective management strategies. The study underscores the evolving treatment landscape in melanoma management, with a potential shift towards immune checkpoint inhibitors in the adjuvant setting, particularly for BRAF-mutated disease. However, limitations in meta-analysis methodologies and the need for long-term investigations into treatment implications on survival and quality of life underscore the importance of continued research., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Molecular targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have produced unprecedented treatment response in cancer therapy for patients harboring specific oncogenic mutations. While the TKIs are mostly well tolerated, they were reported to increase serum levels of creatine kinase (CK) and cause muscle metabolism-related toxicity. CK is an essential enzyme involved in cellular energy metabolism and muscle function. Elevated serum CK levels can arise from both physiological and pathological factors, as well as triggered by specific drug classes. The incidence of serum CK elevation induced by a few approved TKIs (brigatinib, binimetinib, cobimetinib-vemurafenib combination [Food and Drug Administration, United States]; aumolertinib, and sunvozertinib [only approved by National Medical Products Administration, China]) were over 35%. CK elevation-related symptoms include myopathy, myositis, inclusion body myositis (IBM), cardiotoxicity, rhabdomyolysis, rash, and acneiform dermatitis. High-level or severe symptomatic CK elevation may necessitate dose reduction and indirectly dampen TKI efficacy. This review presents an updated summary about the prevalence rate and recent research about mechanisms leading to TKI-induced serum CK elevation in cancer patients. The utility of monitoring serum CK levels for predicting TKI-induced adverse effects and their management will also be discussed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Asciminib is a first-in-class allosteric inhibitor of the kinase activity of BCR::ABL1, specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP). This review focuses on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic data of asciminib, which is approved at a total daily dose of 80 mg for the treatment of adult patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase who are either resistant or intolerant to ≥ 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors or those harboring the T315I mutation (at a dose of 200 mg twice daily). Asciminib is predicted to be almost completely absorbed from the gut, with an absolute bioavailability (F) of approximately 73%. It should be administered in a fasted state, as food (particularly high-fat meals) reduces exposure. Asciminib displays a slightly greater than dose-proportional increase in exposure, with no time-dependent changes in PK observed following repeated dosing. This drug shows low clearance (6.31 L/h), with a moderate volume of distribution (111 L) and high human plasma protein binding (97.3%). The apparent terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2 ) across studies was estimated to be between 7 and 15 h. The PK of asciminib is not substantially affected by body weight, age, gender, race, or renal or hepatic impairment. Asciminib is primarily metabolized via CYP3A4-mediated oxidation (36.0%) and UGT2B7- and UGT2B17-mediated glucuronidation (13.3% and 7.8%, respectively); biliary secretion via breast cancer resistance protein contributes to about 31.1% to total systemic clearance, which is mainly through hepatic metabolism and biliary secretion through the fecal pathway, with renal excretion playing a minor role. The potential for PK drug interaction for asciminib both as a victim and a perpetrator has been summarized here based on clinical and predicted drug-drug interaction studies. Robust exposure-response models characterized asciminib exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships. In patients without the T315I mutation, the exposure-efficacy analysis of the time course of BCR::ABL1 IS percentages highlighted the existence of a slightly positive, albeit not clinically significant, relationship. Higher exposure was required for efficacy in patients harboring the T315I mutation compared with those who did not. The exposure-safety relationship analysis showed no apparent association between exposure and adverse events of interest over the broad range of exposure or dose levels investigated. Asciminib has also been shown to have no clinically relevant effect on cardiac repolarization. Here, we review the clinical pharmacology data available to date for asciminib that supported its clinical development program and regulatory applications., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding This work was supported by Novartis Pharma AG. Competing interests All authors are employees of Novartis. M.H., F.P.C., and A.C. are also Novartis stockholders. Author contributions M.H. conceived the article. All authors performed the literature search, drafted, and/or critically revised the work. Ethics approval Not applicable. Consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data and material Not applicable. Code availability Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Fasudil is a small molecule inhibitor of Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and is approved for the treatment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. In preclinical studies, fasudil has been shown to attenuate neurodegeneration, modulate neuroinflammation, and foster axonal regeneration. We aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fasudil in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis., Methods: ROCK-ALS was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 19 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis centres in Germany, France, and Switzerland. Individuals (aged 18-80 years) with at least probable amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (as per the revised El Escorial criteria), a disease duration of 6-24 months, and a slow vital capacity greater than 65% of predicted normal were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 30 mg (15 mg twice daily) or 60 mg (30 mg twice daily) fasudil or matched placebo intravenously for 20 days over a 4-week period. Follow-up assessments were performed at 45, 90, and 180 days after treatment initiation. The co-primary endpoints were safety until day 180 (defined as the proportion without drug-related serious adverse events) and tolerability during the treatment period (defined as the proportion who did not discontinue treatment due to suspected drug-related adverse events). The primary analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who entered the treatment phase. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03792490) and Eudra-CT (2017-003676-31) and is now completed., Findings: Between Feb 20, 2019, and April 20, 2022, 120 participants were enrolled and randomised; two individuals assigned fasudil 30 mg withdrew consent before the baseline visit. Thus, the intention-to-treat population comprised 35 in the fasudil 30 mg group, 39 in the fasudil 60 mg group, and 44 in the placebo group. The estimated proportion without a drug-related serious adverse event was 1·00 (95% CI 0·91 to 1·00) with placebo, 1·00 (0·89 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·00 (95% CI -0·11 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo and 0·00 (-0·10 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Treatment tolerability (the estimated proportion who did not discontinue) was 0·93 (95% CI 0·81 to 0·99) with placebo, 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 0·90 (0·76 to 0·97) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·07 (95% CI -0·05 to 0·20; p=0·25) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo, and -0·03 (-0·18 to 0·10; p=0·70) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Eight deaths occurred: two in the placebo group, four in the fasudil 30 mg group, and two in the fasudil 60 mg group. The most common serious adverse events were respiratory failure (seven events), gastrostomy (five events), pneumonia (four events), and dysphagia (four events). No serious adverse events or deaths were attributed to study treatment. Adverse events, which were mainly related to disease progression, occurred in 139 participants in the placebo group, 108 in the fasudil 30 mg group, and 105 in the fasudil 60 mg group., Interpretation: Fasudil was well tolerated and safe in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The effect of fasudil on efficacy outcomes should be explored in larger clinical trials with a longer treatment duration, oral administration, and potentially higher dose of the trial drug., Funding: Framework of the E-Rare Joint Transnational Call 2016 "Clinical research for new therapeutic uses of already existing molecules (repurposing) in rare diseases"., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JCK reports a grant from the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Muskelkranke and consulting fees from AbbVie, Biogen, Ipsen, Roche, and Zambon. RG reports grants from the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Muskelkranke, Initiative SMA, and Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, as well as consulting fees from Biogen, Roche, ITF Pharma, and Zambon. DZ has received consulting fees from Novartis and Angelini Pharma and has served on an advisory board for Biogen. NB has received compensations from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. PC serves on the editorial advisory boards of ALS and The Revue Neurologique; reports consultancy work or participation on advisory boards for Amylyx, Biogen, Cytokinetics, Ferrer, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, VectorY, and Zambon; serves on the drug safety monitoring board for Quralis, and has received a research grant from Biogen. EDLC has received travel grants from Biogen and EFFIK. PW reports grants from the Boris Canessa Foundation and the Bundesministerium für Bildung and Forschung; and has received consulting fees from ITF Pharma, Zambon, Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. TM reports institutional grants from Cytokinetics, Ferrer, AL-S Pharma, Sanofi, Amylyx, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Apellis Pharmaceuticals, as well as personal fees from Biogen, Amylyx, and ITF Pharma; and is co-founder and shareholder of the Ambulanzpartner Soziotechnologie APST. JG has received personal fees from UCB, Alexion, Amylyx, Roche, and Zambon; and is a member of advisory boards of the European Network to Cure ALS, Neuroimaging Society in amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, EU ALS coalition, and the World Federation of Neurology Motoneuron Disease group. M-HS received compensations for consulting from Amylyx, Zambon, EFFIK-Italfarmaco, and SOS Oxygene. M-LR reports grants from FightMND, MND Research Australia and the US National Institutes of Health. CN has received fees for non-related services for Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Roche, and Argenx. JW reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health. JS has received payments for participation on advisory boards, talks, travel, and research projects from Abcuro, Alnylam, Argenx, Biotest, CSL Behring, Grifols, Johnson & Johnson, Kezar, LFB, Lupin, Momenta, Novartis, Octapharma, and UCB, all unrelated to the present study. TF has received personal fees from Actimed, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, CSLBehring, Daiichi Sankyo, Galapagos, Immunic, KyowaKirin, LivaNova, Minoryx, Novartis, RECARDIO, Relaxera, Roche, Servier, Viatris, Vifor, Fresenius Kabi, PINK gegen Brustkrebs, Aslan, BionsenseWebster, Enanta, VICO Therapeutics, Pharmaceutical Product Development, and IQVIA, as well as institutional grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, and the European Commission. MB reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and the ALS Association; as well as consulting fees for Alector, Alexion, Annexon, Arrowhead, Biogen, Cartesian, Denali, Eli Lilly, Horizon, Immunovant, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, and uniQure; the University of Miami has licensed intellectual property to Biogen to support the design of the ATLAS trial (NCT04856982), for which MB is academic lead. PL reports grants from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amylyx, Bial, Desitin, ITF Pharma, Novartis, Stadapharm, Raya Therapeutic, Woolsey Pharmaceuticals, and Zambon; and is co-inventor on a patent for the use of fasudil in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (EP 2825175 B1, US 9.980,972 B2). All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is the most prevalent childhood brain tumor group, currently regarded as a chronic disease. On 23 April 2024, the U.S. FDA approved a new type II RAF inhibitor, tovorafenib (OJEMDA TM ), previously known as DAY101, for the treatment of patients aged 6 months and older with relapsed or refractory (R/R) pLGG harboring a BRAF fusion or rearrangement, or BRAF V600E mutation., Areas Covered: This article aims to review the pharmacological properties of tovorafenib and evaluate its efficacy and safety in the treatment of R/R pLGG. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases for English-language publications related to tovorafenib, including journal articles and conference abstracts, up through 20 August 2024., Expert Opinion: As the first and only FDA-approved medicine for children with BRAF fusions or rearrangements, which are the most common molecular alteration in pLGG, tovorafenib shows superior central nervous system penetration without the paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway reported for type I BRAF inhibitors. Phase 1 and the pivotal phase 2 trials have demonstrated that tovorafenib monotherapy is generally well-tolerated and exhibits encouraging signs of meaningful, rapid and sustained clinical activity in children and young adults with BRAF-altered pLGG.

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological malignancy, representing 2.5 % of all female cancers and accounting for 5 % of female cancer-related fatalities. Despite numerous strategies in its treatment, the disease shows a high recurrence rate and a low survival rate. Consequently, there is a growing focus on targeted therapies in ovarian cancer treatment. It is well-known that VEGFR and LPA pathways undergo alterations in ovarian cancer and stimulate survival, adhesion, migration, invasion, tumor growth and angiogenesis. Cabozantinib (CBZ) is a multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that effectively targets MET, VEGFR-1, 2, 3, FLT3, c-KIT, and RET. Ki16425 is a selective inhibitor of LPA receptors 1, 2, and 3. Therefore, targeting LPA receptors and combining with VEGFR inhibitor is a strategic approach for ovarian cancer treatment. In this study, it was aimed to prepare polymer-drug nanoconjugate for both VEGFR and LPAR inhibition. For this, O-(2-Carboxyethyl) polyethylene glycol (PEG 5000 ) which advantages are known in cancer studies, was chosen as the carrier system, and a nanoconjugate containing Ki16425 and CBZ (Ki-PEG-CBZ) was synthesized and its potential was evaluated. Initially, CBZ and Ki16425 were conjugated to the PEG 5000 through pH-sensitive hydrazone and ester bonds. After nanoconjugate characterization, in vitro release and its ovarian cancer treatment potential were evaluated on A2780, OVCAR3 and SKOV3 ovarian cancer cell lines. A nanoconjugate was obtained with a particle size of 169 ± 15.23 nm, a zeta potential of -13.5 ± 1.21 mV, and a release profile lasting 48 h, containing CBZ and Ki16425 with drug loading efficiencies of 73.71 ± 0.53 % and 77.72 ± 2.51 %, respectively. In vitro studies have demonstrated that Ki-PEG-CBZ is highly effective against ovarian cancer. We suggest that the developed polymer-drug nanoconjugate is an effective and safe nanoconjugate for the treatment of ovarian cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This post-hoc analysis of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study (NCT03732807) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral Janus kinase 3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, in patients with alopecia totalis (AT) and alopecia universalis (AU). Patients aged ≥ 12 years with alopecia areata (AA) and ≥50% scalp hair loss received once-daily ritlecitinib 50 or 30 mg (± 4-week 200-mg loading dose) or placebo for 24 weeks. In a subsequent 24-week extension period, the ritlecitinib groups continued their doses and patients initially assigned to placebo switched to ritlecitinib (200/50 or 50 mg daily). In this analysis, clinician- and patient-reported hair regrowth outcomes were assessed at weeks 24 and 48 in four AA subgroups: AT/AU, AT, AU, and non-AT/AU. Safety was monitored throughout. Of the 718 randomized patients, 151 (21%) and 147 (20%) were defined as having AT or AU, respectively. At week 24, Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20 (≤20% scalp hair loss) response rates were higher in the ritlecitinib-treated AT/AU, AT, and AU groups (7%-14%, 7%-21%, and 4%-10%, respectively) vs the placebo group (0% in the AT/AU, AT, and AU groups). The proportions of patients with a SALT score of ≤20 increased through week 48 (AT/AU, 13%-31%; AT, 11%-27%; AU, 6%-41%). Additionally, at week 24, 25%-43%, 32%-42%, and 12%-50% of patients with AT/AU, AT, and AU, respectively, who received ritlecitinib achieved a moderately or greatly improved response based on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. Response rates generally increased through week 48 and were similar across AA subgroups. In patients with AT/AU, ritlecitinib was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with that of the overall AA population. Ritlecitinib demonstrated clinical efficacy, patient-reported improvement, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with AT and AU through week 48. A plain language summary of this study is available at https://doi.org/10.25454/pfizer.figshare.26879161. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03732807., (© 2024 Pfizer Inc. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Introduction: The comparative efficacy and safety of lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), versus second-generation ALK TKIs as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain as there are no head-to-head clinical trials., Methods: Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were conducted using phase III trial data demonstrating superior efficacy over crizotinib, a first-generation ALK TKI. MAICs were conducted to compare lorlatinib (CROWN) versus alectinib (ALEX and ALESIA) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) with matching based on prespecified effect modifiers. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response (OR), and time to progression in the central nervous system (TTP-CNS). Safety outcomes included Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, or dose interruption., Results: Lorlatinib was estimated to improve PFS compared to alectinib (ALEX) (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.88]) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) (HR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.82]). Lorlatinib was estimated to improve TTP-CNS compared with brigatinib (HR: 0.19 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.71]). The estimated Grade ≥3 AE rate was higher with lorlatinib than with alectinib (RR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.94]); however, no differences were observed in other safety endpoints (ie, AEs leading to discontinuation, dose reduction, or interruption) or compared to brigatinib., Conclusion: Lorlatinib was estimated to have superior efficacy over first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, but a higher rate of Grade ≥3 AEs compared to alectinib. These data support the use of lorlatinib as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic NSCLC., Competing Interests: Disclosure Devin Abrahami, Anna Polli, Haitao Chu, and Despina Thomaidou are employees of Pfizer and have stock ownership in Pfizer. John Mark Kelton was employed by Pfizer during the conduct of this study, and has stock ownership in Pfizer, Abbott and AbbVie. Christine Garcia receives consulting fees from Pfizer. Todd Bauer receives consulting fees from and is an ad board member of Pfizer, Bayer, and Lilly. Conor Chandler and Min Tan are employees of Evidera, which received financial support from Pfizer in connection with the study and the development of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bariatric surgery is increasingly performed to treat severe obesity. As a result of anatomical and physiological changes in the gastrointestinal tract, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral drugs can be altered, affecting their efficacy and safety. This includes the class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which are used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This case series describes the clinical course of four CML cases with a history of bariatric surgery. The patients used various TKIs (nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, ponatinib, and imatinib) for which 15 drug levels were measured. The measured TKI concentrations were in part subtherapeutic, and highly variable when compared to mean levels measured in the general population. Multiple drug levels were measured in these patients, as the clinicians were aware of the possible impact of bariatric surgery. The drug levels were used as additional input for clinical decision-making. All four patients required TKI switches and/or dose modifications to achieve an effective and tolerable treatment. Eventually, adequate clinical and molecular remissions were achieved in all cases. In summary, TKI concentrations of patients undergoing bariatric surgery may be subtherapeutic. Moreover, there is substantial interindividual and intraindividual variation, which may be explained by the complex interference of bariatric surgery and associated weight loss. For clinical practice, therapeutic drug monitoring is advised in patients with a history of bariatric surgery in case of suboptimal response or loss of response., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Envonalkib (TQ-B3139) is a novel, potent anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This phase I mass balance study investigated the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of 14 C-radiolabeled envonalkib in healthy Chinese male subjects., Methods: A single oral dose of 600 mg (150 µCi) [ 14 C]envonalkib was administered to healthy male subjects under fasted state. Samples of blood, urine and feces were collected for quantitative determination of total radioactivity and unchanged envonalkib, and the metabolites identification., Results: After dosing, the median T max of radioactivity was 4 h and the mean t 1/2 was 65.2 h in plasma. The exposure of total radioactivity was much higher than that of unchanged envonalkib in plasma. The mean total recovery of the radiolabeled dose was 93.93% over 504 h post-dose, with 15.23% in urine and 78.71% in feces. Envonalkib underwent extensive metabolism and a total of 15 metabolites were identified in plasma, urine, and feces. Unchanged envonalkib and its major metabolite M315 were the main components in plasma, accounting for 20.37% and 33.33% of total plasma radioactivity. In urine, O-dealkylation metabolite M315 was the major component accounted for 7.98% of dose. In feces, 16.01% of dose was excreted as cysteine conjugate M434-1. Envonalkib was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events observed in the study., Conclusion: Envonalkib was extensively metabolized prior to excretion and eliminated primarily as metabolites via feces., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have significant antitumor activity to advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with classic EGFR mutations. However, EGFR-TKI monotherapy shows poor efficacy in patients whose circulating tumor cell DNA (ctDNA) of EGFR mutations cannot be rapidly cleared., Materials and Methods: As a third-generation TKI, furmonertinib has shown superior antitumor activity and minor toxicity. The FOCUS-C study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT05334277) to explore the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib plus pemetrexed-platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab versus furmonertinib monotherapy in untreated advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC patients without EGFR clearance after the induction therapy of furmonertinib. Patients with EGFR clearance will still receive furmonertinib as Arm A. Patients without ctDNA clearance will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio as Arm B1 (furmonertinib), Arm B2 (furmonertinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed for 4 cycles, and then furmonertinib and pemetrexed as maintenance therapy) and Arm B3 (Arm B2 regimen plus bevacizumab). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) in Arm B2/B1. Secondary endpoints include PFS in Arm B3/B1, PFS in Arm A/B1, PFS in Arm B3/B2, objective response and disease control rate, overall survival and safety in all Arms. Exploratory endpoints are focused on the efficacy based on plasma NGS at different timepoints., Conclusion: This study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of furmonertinib plus carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab verses furmonertinib alone in untreated patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC without EGFR clearance., Competing Interests: Disclosure Li Zhang has received research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche. No other disclosures were reported., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of applying two recent phase I meta-analyses methods to protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) developed in oncology and to identify situations where these methods could be both feasible and useful. This ancillary study used data from a systematic review conducted to identify dose-finding studies for PKIs. PKIs selected for meta-analyses were required to have at least five completed dose-finding studies involving cancer patients, with available results, and dose escalation guided by toxicity assessment. To account for heterogeneity caused by various administration schedules, some studies were divided into study parts, considered as separate entities in the meta-analyses. For each PKI, two Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis methods were applied to model the toxicity probability distribution of the recommended dose and to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Meta-analyses were performed for 20 PKIs including 96 studies corresponding to 115 study parts. The median posterior probability of toxicity probability was below the toxicity thresholds of 0.20 for 70% of the PKIs, even if the resulting credible intervals were very wide. All approved doses were below the MTD estimated for the minimum toxicity threshold, except for one, for which the approved dose was above the MTD estimated for the maximal threshold. The application of phase I meta-analysis methods has been feasible for the majority of PKI; nevertheless, their implementation requires multiple conditions. However, meta-analyses resulted in estimates with large uncertainty, probably due to limited patient numbers and/or between-study variability. This calls into question the reliability of the recommended doses., (© 2024 The Author(s). Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Locoregional treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and systemic targeted immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) have achieved promising efficacy. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE and HAIC plus TKI with or without PD-1 for uHCC., Patients and Methods: From November 2020 to February 2024, the data of 44 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI + PD-1 (THKP group) and 34 patients who received TACE-HAIC + TKI (THK group) were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion rates, and adverse events (AEs)., Results: A total of 78 patients were recruited in our single-center study. The patients in THKP group had prolonged median OS [25 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.0-26.0 vs 18 months, 95% CI 16.1-19.9; p = 0.000278], median PFS [16 months, 95% CI 14.1-17.9 vs 12 months 95% CI 9.6-14.4; p = 0.004] and higher ORR (38.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0. 156) and DCR (88.6% vs 64.7%, p = 0.011) compared with those in THK group. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment option and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level were independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS. The frequency of AEs were similar between the two groups., Conclusions: The THKP group had better efficacy for uHCC than the THK group, with acceptable safety., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background and Aims: The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) has radically changed the treatment strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but raises questions. Our objectives were to determine survival outcomes and safety in a real-life multicenter French cohort, to investigate the on-treatment prognostic value of the bioinflammatory RECA score, and to perform a matched comparison with patients who previously received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)., Methodology: A retrospective analysis of 109 consecutive patients enrolled from September 2020 to January 2023 and a post matched comparison with a TKI cohort ( n  = 79) by the propensity score matching method., Results: The Atz/Bev population was mainly nonviral disease patients (69%) with Child-Pugh grade A (90%), performance status 0/1 (90%), and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (38%) or stage C (62%) classification. After a median follow-up of 6.5 months (3.6-11.7), overall survival (OS) was 13.0 (5.1-28.7) months. OS was independently associated with metastasis, increased alkaline phosphatase, and serum bilirubin levels. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 78% of patients, mostly grade 1 or 2. The RECA score clearly revealed two different prognosis groups after three cycles. No difference in OS was observed after matching between sequential treatment with TKIs and Atz/Bev., Conclusion: This real-life study highlights the importance of liver function when using Atz/Bev combination and the necessity of identifying predictive markers of response to HCC therapies. Our findings suggest a change in practices, with a marked proportion of intermediate stages, and support the on-treatment prognostic value of an inflammatory score., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Adavosertib (AZD1775) is a potent small-molecule inhibitor of Wee1 kinase. This analysis utilized pharmacokinetic data from 8 Phase I/II studies of adavosertib to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of adavosertib in patients (n = 538) with solid tumors and evaluate the impact of covariates on exposure. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach was employed to estimate population and individual parameters from the clinical trial data. The model for time dependency of apparent clearance (CL) was developed in a stepwise manner and the final model validated by visual predictive checks (VPCs). Using an adavosertib dose of 300 mg once daily on a 5 days on/2 days off dosing schedule given 2 weeks out of a 3-week cycle, simulation analyses evaluated the impact of covariates on the following exposure metrics at steady state: maximum concentration during a 21-day cycle, area under the curve (AUC) during a 21-day cycle, AUC during the second week of a treatment cycle, and AUC on day 12 of a treatment cycle. The final model was a linear 2-compartment model with lag time into the dosing compartment and first-order absorption into the central compartment, time-varying CL, and random effects on all model parameters. VPCs and steady-state observations confirmed that the final model satisfied all the requirements for reliable simulation of randomly sampled Phase I and II populations with different covariate characteristics. Simulation-based analyses revealed that body weight, renal impairment status, and race were key factors determining the variability of drug-exposure metrics., (© 2024, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Small-molecule drug development faces the challenge of low success rate. In this paper, we propose one potential cause that may occur in the preclinical phase and has rarely been brought up before - the neglected target-mediated low plasma exposure, and the subsequent lead compound mis-selection due to conventional pharmacokinetic criteria requiring sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life. To evaluate the concept of target-mediate low plasma exposure, we established a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to evaluate the concentration-time profiles of a group of virtual lead series analogs in plasma and in tissues with and without pharmacological target expression. Simulation results demonstrated that the candidate with the highest target binding has the lowest plasma exposure due to target-mediated tissue retention. The traditional PK criteria, such as the requirement of sufficient plasma exposure and desired half-life, may potentially result in lead compound mis-selection by discarding the appropriate and best candidate(s). The mPBPK model was partially validated using 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on our in-house PK and tissue distribution data obtained in animals. The association rate constant (K ass ) was estimated to be 49.8 h -1 , 31.4 h -1 , 8.58 h -1 , and 1.91 h -1 for afatinib, dasatinib, gefitinib, and sorafenib, respectively. Among these four model drugs, a strong correlation was observed between their K ass values and AUC high-perfused tissue /AUC plasma ratios, a metric of tissue retention. Our mPBPK modeling and simulation results indicated that the concept of target-mediated low plasma exposure should be kept in mind during the lead compound selection process., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists.)

Background and Aims: Compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy, TKI combined with PD1 can improve the therapeutic effect of liver cancer and has been widely used in clinical practice. However, there is a lack of effective biomarkers to identify patients who would benefit more from this combination therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether baseline lymphocyte counts can identify patients with liver cancer who would benefit from targeted immune combination therapy., Methods: Data from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received TKIs or TKIs in combination with PD1 between June 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into high and low groups based on the median absolute count of peripheral lymphocytes before systemic therapy and differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between TKI and TKI+PD1 were compared between the two groups., Results: In total, 72 patients were included in this study, with a median follow-up of 1.5 years. Both PFS and OS in the TKI+PD1 group showed a good prognostic trend (p = 0.058 and p = 0.077, respectively). Subgroup analyses based on peripheral blood lymphocyte counts showed that the combination regimen had a significant PFS and OS advantage only in patients with high peripheral blood lymphocyte counts (p = 0.036 and p = 0.031, respectively), but not in patients with low absolute peripheral blood lymphocyte counts (p = 0.819 and p = 0.913, respectively)., Conclusions: Peripheral blood lymphocyte count is a simple and effective biomarker that can be used to identify patients with liver cancer who will benefit more from TKI+PD-1 combination therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zhao, Wang, Fu, Zhang and Xie.)

IRAK4 inhibitors have been sought for the treatment of a host of diseases, however, recent evidence suggests a protein degradation approach might have advantages over an inhibitor. This viewpoint summarizes the discovery of KT-474─a selective and orally bioavailable interleuken receptor-associated kinase 4 proteolysis-targeting chimera in Phase 2 clinical trials for autoimmune indications.

Interleukin-1 receptor associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) is an essential mediator of the IL-1R and TLR signaling pathways, both of which have been implicated in multiple autoimmune conditions. Hence, blocking the activity of IRAK4 represents an attractive approach for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. The activity of this serine/threonine kinase is dependent on its kinase and scaffolding activities; thus, degradation represents a potentially superior approach to inhibition. Herein, we detail the exploration of structure-activity relationships that ultimately led to the identification of KT-474, a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable heterobifunctional IRAK4 degrader. This represents the first heterobifunctional degrader evaluated in a nononcology indication and dosed to healthy human volunteers. This molecule successfully completed phase I studies in healthy adult volunteers and patients with atopic dermatitis or hidradenitis suppurativa. Phase II clinical trials in both of these indications have been initiated.

Background: Amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab-lazertinib) has shown clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in patients with previously untreated or osimertinib-pretreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: In a phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated EGFR -mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab-lazertinib (in an open-label fashion), osimertinib (in a blinded fashion), or lazertinib (in a blinded fashion, to assess the contribution of treatment components). The primary end point was progression-free survival in the amivantamab-lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group, as assessed by blinded independent central review., Results: Overall, 1074 patients underwent randomization (429 to amivantamab-lazertinib, 429 to osimertinib, and 216 to lazertinib). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-lazertinib group than in the osimertinib group (23.7 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.85; P<0.001). An objective response was observed in 86% of the patients (95% CI, 83 to 89) in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and in 85% of those (95% CI, 81 to 88) in the osimertinib group; among patients with a confirmed response (336 in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and 314 in the osimertinib group), the median response duration was 25.8 months (95% CI, 20.1 to could not be estimated) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 18.5), respectively. In a planned interim overall survival analysis of amivantamab-lazertinib as compared with osimertinib, the hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05). Predominant adverse events were EGFR -related toxic effects. The incidence of discontinuation of all agents due to treatment-related adverse events was 10% with amivantamab-lazertinib and 3% with osimertinib., Conclusions: Amivantamab-lazertinib showed superior efficacy to osimertinib as first-line treatment in EGFR -mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARIPOSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04487080.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

64-year-old woman with a history of esophageal strictures presented in 2015 for evaluation of progressive depigmented patches that developed over the preceding year. She was prescribed topical steroids with no improvement. Narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and topical tacrolimus were eventually added to the topical steroids accompanying an oral steroid taper. The patient discontinued topical tacrolimus because of irritation. The patient was lost to follow-up for the next 3 years, during which she did not take any treatment and her vitiligo had worsened (Figure 1). At her visit 3 years later, she repeated an oral prednisone taper and restarted mid-potency topical steroid. In January 2020, the patient was approved for and started oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily. Consistent improvement was observed on the subsequent visits in March 2020 and November 2020. The only adverse reaction reported by the patient was an increase in furuncles on her pelvis and thighs.

Background: This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305, versus chemotherapy alone for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system., Methods: 10-year Markov model was developed using a 21-day cycle length. Transition probabilities were derived from the ORIENT-31 trial, while cost and health state utilities were obtained from publicly databases, local hospitals, and published literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as the primary model output and compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold range of $15,289.34 to $38,223.34 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model., Results: In the base-case analysis, sintilimab plus IBI305 and chemotherapy had an ICER of $53,266.32/QALYs, exceeding the upper WTP threshold. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy had an ICER of $15,329.11/QALY, slightly above the lower WTP threshold. Subgroup analysis yielded consistent results. Deterministic sensitivity analyses found no ICER for sintilimab plus chemotherapy beyond the upper WTP threshold. Most model input changes did not decrease the ICER of sintilimab plus IBI305 and chemotherapy below the upper WTP threshold. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses further demonstrated the cost-effectiveness superiority of sintilimab plus chemotherapy over sintilimab plus IBI305 and chemotherapy., Conclusion: This study supports the cost-effectiveness of using sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of combining sintilimab with IBI305 and chemotherapy in this particular patient group may be lacking., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The development of transforming growth factor β receptor inhibitors (TGF β Ri) as new medicines has been affected by cardiac valvulopathy and arteriopathy toxicity findings in nonclinical toxicology studies. PF-06952229 (MDV6058) selected using rational drug design is a potent and selective TGF β RI inhibitor with a relatively clean off-target selectivity profile and good pharmacokinetic properties across species. PF-06952229 inhibited clinically translatable phospho-SMAD2 biomarker (≥60%) in human and cynomolgus monkey peripheral blood mononuclear cells, as well as in mouse and rat splenocytes. Using an optimized, intermittent dosing schedule (7-day on/7-day off/cycle; 5 cycles), PF-06952229 demonstrated efficacy in a 63-day syngeneic MC38 colon carcinoma mouse model. In the pivotal repeat-dose toxicity studies (rat and cynomolgus monkey), PF-06952229 on an intermittent dosing schedule (5-day on/5-day off cycle; 5 cycles, 28 doses) showed no cardiac-related adverse findings. However, new toxicity findings related to PF-06952229 included reversible hepatocellular (hepatocyte necrosis with corresponding clinically monitorable transaminase increases) and lung (hemorrhage with mixed cell inflammation) findings at ≥ targeted projected clinical efficacious exposures. Furthermore, partially reversible cartilage hypertrophy (trachea and femur in rat; femur in monkey) and partially to fully reversible, clinically monitorable decreases in serum phosphorus and urinary phosphate at ≥ projected clinically efficacious exposures were observed. Given the integral role of TGF β in endochondral bone formation, cartilage findings in toxicity studies have been observed with other TGF β Ri classes of compounds. The favorable cumulative profile of PF-06952229 in biochemical, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and nonclinical studies allowed for its evaluation in cancer patients using the intermittent dosing schedule (7-day on/7-day off) and careful protocol-defined monitoring. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Only a few TGF β Ri have progressed for clinical evaluation due to adverse cardiac findings in pivotal nonclinical toxicity studies. The potential translations of such findings in patients are of major concern. Using a carefully optimized intermittent dosing schedule, PF-06952229 has demonstrated impressive pharmacological efficacy in the syngeneic MC38 colon carcinoma mouse model. Additionally, a nonclinical toxicology package without cardiovascular liabilities and generally monitorable toxicity profile has been completed. The compound presents an acceptable International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use S9-compliant profile for the intended-to-treat cancer patients., (Copyright © 2024 by The Author(s).)

Background: Anlotinib was approved as a third line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China. However, the impact of concurrent administration of various clinical drugs on the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of anlotinib remains undetermined. As such, this study aims to evaluate the DDI of anlotinib as a victim by establishing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model., Methods: The PBPK model of anlotinib as a victim drug was constructed and validated in the Simcyp ® incorporating parameters derived from in vitro studies, pre-clinical investigations, and clinical research encompassing patients with cancer. Subsequently, plasma exposure of anlotinib in cancer patients was predicted for single- and multi-dose co-administration with typical perpetrators mentioned in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) industrial guidance., Results: Based on predictions, the CYP3A potent inhibitor ketoconazole demonstrated the most significant DDI with anlotinib, regardless of whether anlotinib is administered as a single dose or multiple doses. Ketoconazole increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C max ) of single-dose anlotinib to 1.41-fold and 1.08-fold, respectively. In contrast, rifampicin, a potent inducer of CYP3A enzymes, exhibited a relatively higher level of DDI, with AUC R and C maxR values of 0.44 and 0.79, respectively., Conclusion: Based on the PBPK modeling, there is a low risk of DDI between anlotinib and potent CYP3A/1A2 inhibitors, but caution and enhanced monitoring for adverse reactions are advised. To mitigate the risk of anti-tumor treatment failure, it is recommended to avoid concurrent use of strong CYP3A inducers. In conclusion, our study enhances understanding of anlotinib's interaction with medications, aiding scientists, prescribers, and drug labels in gauging the expected impact of CYP3A/1A2 modulators on anlotinib's pharmacokinetics., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Bu et al.)

Purpose: This multicenter phase II basket trial investigated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of Debio 1347, an investigational, oral, highly selective, ATP-competitive, small molecule inhibitor of FGFR1-3, in patients with solid tumors harboring a functional FGFR1-3 fusion., Patients and Methods: Eligible adults had a previously treated locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic biliary tract (cohort 1), urothelial (cohort 2), or another histologic cancer type (cohort 3). Debio 1347 was administered at 80 mg once daily, continuously, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and incidence of adverse events., Results: Between March 22, 2019, and January 8, 2020, 63 patients were enrolled and treated, 30 in cohort 1, 4 in cohort 2, and 29 in cohort 3. An unplanned preliminary statistical review showed that the efficacy of Debio 1347 was lower than predicted, and the trial was terminated. In total, 3 of 58 evaluable patients had partial responses, representing an objective response rate of 5%, with a further 26 (45%) having stable disease (≥6 weeks duration). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (35%) of 63 patients, with the most common being hyperphosphatemia (13%) and stomatitis (5%). Two patients (3%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events., Conclusions: Debio 1347 had manageable toxicity; however, the efficacy in patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions did not support further clinical evaluation in this setting. Our transcriptomic-based analysis characterized in detail the incidence and nature of FGFR fusions across solid tumors. See related commentary by Hage Chehade et al., p. 4549., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular cancer with pathogenic TAZ-CAMTA1 (calmodulinbinding transcription activator 1) operating as an oncogenic driver through activation of the MAPK pathway. Trametinib is an inhibitor of MEK, a critical kinase in the MAPK pathway. We sought to evaluate the effect of trametinib in patients with EHE., Patients and Methods: A phase 2 trial of trametinib was conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EHE. Eligibility requirements included evidence of tumor progression or presence of EHE-related pain requiring opiates for management before enrollment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST1.1 in cases with TAZ- CAMTA1 confirmed by fusion-FISH. Secondary objectives were to estimate ORR for all patients, median progression-free survival (PFS), 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, patient safety, and change in patient-reported global health and pain scores per PROMIS questionnaires., Results: 44 patients enrolled and 42 started trametinib. TAZ- CAMTA1 was detected in 27 tumor samples. TheORRwas 3.7%[95% confidence interval (CI), 0.094-19.0], median PFS was 10.4 months (95%CI, 7.1-NA), and 2-year OS rate was 33.3%(95%CI, 19.1-58.2) in the target population. Median pain intensity and interference scores improved significantly after 4 weeks of trametinib in patients using opiates. Common adverse events related to trametinib were rash, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea/constipation, alopecia, and edema; one grade 5 ARDS/pneumonitis was related to trametinib., Conclusions: Trametinib was associated with reduction in EHE-related pain and median PFS of more than 6 months, providing palliative benefit in patients with advanced EHE, but the trial did not meet the ORR goal. See related commentary by Van Tine and Haarberg, p. 4552., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The effect of immune-based therapies on patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy remains unclear. The ALTER-L038 study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of a chemotherapy-free combination of benmelstobart, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody, and anlotinib, a small-molecule multi-target anti-angiogenic TKI, in EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC patients who progressed after EGFR TKI therapy. Patients were enrolled in a phase I/II study. In phase I (dose-escalation), patients received anlotinib (8, 10, 12 mg) plus benmelstobart (1200 mg). Recommended phase II dose, determined during phase I, was used in phase II dose-expansion cohort. Primary endpoints were maximum tolerable dose in phase I and progression-free survival (PFS) in phase II. At the data cutoff date (March 10, 2024), 55 patients were enrolled in phase II dose-expansion cohort. Median PFS of patients included in phase II cohort was 9.0 months, median overall survival was 28.9 months, objective response rate was 25.5%, disease control rate was 87.3%, and median duration of response was 19.8 months. Incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in study population was 25.5% (14/55), whereas grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 10.9% (6/55) of patients. Benmelstobart plus anlotinib showed promising anti-tumor efficacy with tolerable safety profile, supporting the value of further development of this convenient chemotherapy-free regimen for patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC who progressed after EGFR TKI therapy. Trial Registration: ChiCTR1900026273., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

TAM receptor tyrosine kinases have emerged as promising therapeutic targets for cancer treatment due to their roles in both tumor intrinsic survival mechanisms and suppression of antitumor immunity within the tumor microenvironment. Inhibiting MerTK and Axl selectively is believed to hinder cancer cell survival, reverse the protumor myeloid phenotype, and suppress efferocytosis, thereby eliciting an antitumor immune response. In this study, we present the discovery of A-910 , a highly potent and selective dual MerTK/Axl inhibitor, achieved through a structure-based medicinal chemistry campaign. The lead compound exhibits favorable oral bioavailability, exceptional kinome selectivity, and significantly improved in vivo target engagement. These findings support the use of A-910 as an orally bioavailable in vivo tool compound for investigating the immunotherapy potential of dual MerTK/Axl inhibition.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can cause diverse clinical manifestations in multiple organ systems. Child-onset SLE (cSLE) is associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality than adult-onset SLE. The traditional treatments for SLE (glucocorticoids, antimalarials, conventional and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) often have significant adverse effects and may not fully control disease activity. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that inhibits the JAK-STAT pathway and has the potential to reduce SLE severity., Methods: cSLE patients who received tofacitinib and had at least one follow-up visit were retrospectively examined. Case histories, laboratory test results, and treatment regimens were analyzed at disease onset, initiation of tofacitinib treatment, and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after starting tofacitinib., Results: We examined 9 patients with refractory cSLE. All patients were female and the average age at diagnosis was 10.67 years. At initiation of tofacitinib, the average age was 13.28 years and the average disease duration was 2.62 years. Four patients experienced alleviation of symptoms and reduced their daily prednisone dosages; one of them also discontinued cyclosporine A and two of them also discontinued belimumab. The other 5 patients experienced no apparent benefit., Conclusion: Tofacitinib may provide clinical benefits for some patients with refractory cSLE, and can also allow reduction in the glucocorticoid dosage. Tofacitinib has the potential as an adjunctive treatment for some patients with cSLE., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Hou, Zhou, Zhao, Wang and Du.)

Background and Objective: Tucatinib is a highly selective, oral, reversible, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Tucatinib is approved at a 300-mg twice-daily dose in adults in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for advanced HER2-postitive (HER2+) unresectable or metastatic breast cancer and in combination with trastuzumab for RAS wild-type HER2+ unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. This study sought to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and assess sources of PK variability of tucatinib in healthy volunteers and in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast or colorectal cancers., Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on data from four healthy participant studies and three studies in patients with either HER2+ metastatic breast cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Clinically relevant covariates were evaluated to assess their impact on exposure, and overall model performance was evaluated by prediction-corrected visual predictive checks., Results: A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination and first-order absorption preceded by a lag time adequately described tucatinib pharmacokinetic profiles in 151 healthy participants and 132 patients. Tumor type was identified as a significant covariate affecting tucatinib bioavailability and clearance, resulting in a 1.2-fold and 2.1-fold increase in tucatinib steady-state exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) in HER2+ metastatic colorectal cancer and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, respectively, compared with healthy participants. No other covariates, including mild renal or hepatic impairment, had an impact on tucatinib pharmacokinetics., Conclusions: The impact of statistically significant covariates identified was not considered clinically meaningful. No tucatinib dose adjustments are required based on the covariates tested in the final population pharmacokinetic model., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03723395, NCT03914755, NCT03826602, NCT03043313, NCT01983501, NCT02025192., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Capmatinib has previously shown activity in treatment-naive and previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a MET exon 14-skipping mutation (METex14). Here, we report the final outcomes from the phase 2 GEOMETRY mono-1 study with an aim to provide further evidence for the activity of capmatinib., Methods: In this non-randomised, multi-cohort, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted in 152 centres and hospitals in 25 countries, with patients treated in 95 centres in 20 countries, eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with MET-dysregulated, EGFR wild-type, and ALK rearrangement-negative advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB/IV) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were assigned to cohorts (1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4, 5a, 5b, 6 and 7) based on their MET status (METex14 or MET amplification) and previous therapy lines. Patients received capmatinib (400 mg orally twice daily) in 21-day treatment cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 and was performed on the full analysis set (all patients who received at least one dose of capmatinib). Previous reports of this study had published interim or primary data for cohorts 1-7. Here, we report the final clinical outcomes from all METex14 cohorts (4, 5b, 6, and 7) and safety from all study cohorts (1-7). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02414139, and has been completed., Findings: Of 373 treated patients enrolled from June 11, 2015, to March 12, 2020, 160 (97 [61%] female) patients had METex14 NSCLC and were enrolled in four cohorts: 60 treatment-naive (cohorts 5b and 7) and 100 previously treated (cohorts 4 and 6). The overall median study follow-up was 46·4 months (IQR 41·8-65·4) for the treatment-naïve patients and 66·9 months (56·7-73·9) for previously treated patients, respectively. Overall responses were recorded in 41 (68%; 95% CI 55·0-79·7) of 60 treatment-naive patients and 44 (44%; 95% CI 34·1-54·3) of 100 previously treated patients. In all 373 treated patients, the most common treatment-related adverse events were peripheral oedema (n=174; 47%), nausea (n=130; 35%), increased blood creatinine (n=78; 21%), and vomiting (n=74; 20%). Grade 3-4 serious adverse events occurred in 164 (44%) patients, dyspnoea being the most common (18 patients [5%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in four (1%) patients (one each of cardiac arrest, hepatitis, organising pneumonia, and pneumonitis). No new safety signals were reported., Interpretation: These long-term results support METex14 as a targetable oncogenic driver in NSCLC and add to the evidence supporting capmatinib as a targeted treatment option for treatment-naive and previously treated patients with METex14 NSCLC., Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JW reports research grant support (to their institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis, and Pfizer; and consulting fees or honoraria for lectures and for attending meetings from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Lilly, Loxo, Merck, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Nuvalent, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Turning Point. MH declares personal honoraria for lectures and presentations from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, MSD, and Roche. J-YH reports research grants from Pfizer, Takeda, and ONO; consulting fees or honoraria for lectures and presentations from AstraZeneca, Jassen, Amgen, Oncobix, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Norvatis, Abion, Takeda, Pfizer, and Yuhan; participation in data safety monitoring board for AstraZeneca, Jassen; and a leadership role for National Cancer Drug Assessment Committee. NR declares research grants from Artidis, MSD, Amgen, and Roche; honoraria for lectures and presentations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and Regeneron; support for attending the meetings from Takeda, Regeneron, and Roche; and participation in a data safety monitoring and advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and Regeneron. P-JS reports the research grants received (to their institution) from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, and Gilead; and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. EFS reports consulting fees support to their institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Merck; honoraria for lectures and presentations for self from Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo; and participation in a data safety monitoring and advisory board for Daiichi Sankyo and Taiho for institution. JV declares consulting fees received from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and PDCline; honoraria for lectures and presentations from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and Merck; and participation in a data safety monitoring and advisory board for AstraZeneca, Boehringer, and Transgene. MN reports honoraria received for lectures and presentations from Ono Pharmaceuticals, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, AbbVie, Takeda Pfizer, Boehringer, Ingelheim, Novartis, Nippon, Kayaku, Merck, and Janssen; and support for attending meetings from Novartis. WA declares research grants received from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Bioatla, Imugene, Astride, BridgeBio, AbbVie, and Novocure; and participation in data safety monitoring and advisory board for Lilly. EBG reports research grants received (to their institution) from ABL-Bio, Arrivent, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi, Sanko, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Merck, Prelude, Regeneron, and Synthekine; consulting fees from AbbVie, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Arrivent, Atreca, BridgeBio, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hookipa, LianBio, Merckl Merus, Novartis, Nuvalent, Personalis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Seagan, Sensei, Sumitomo, Strata, Summit, Synthekine, Xilio, and Zymeworks; support for attending meetings from A2 and Novartis; patents issued (to their institution); and other financial support for independent medical education from Daiichi Sankyo and Ipsen. DSWT reports research grants support to their institution from ACM Biolabs, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work; consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Ingelheim, DKSH, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; honoraria for lectures and presentations from Amgen, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda, BeiGene, Regeneron, and Zymeworks; and support for attending meetings from Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Zymeworks. TS declares honoraria for lectures from Amgen, AnHeart Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Towa Pharmaceutical. GMF declares the stocks and shareholder for Roche. AR, MC, SLM, CB, YY, LJ, LF, and AY are employees of Novartis. AB reports stocks and stock options from Novartis and Daiichi Sankyo. RSH declares research grants received to their institution for clinical trials from AbbVie, Agios, Corvus, Daichii Sankyo, Erasca, Lilly, Mirati, Mythic, Novartis, and Turning Point; and consulting fees for self from AbbVie, Astrazeneca, Biohaven, Claim Therapeutics, Daichii Sankyo, EMD Serono, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi. SVO, HJMG, and MJ declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of the order of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors on the development of brain metastases in patients with metastatic unresectable BRAF V600-mutant melanoma is unknown. The SECOMBIT trial examined the impact of the order of receipt of these treatments in such patients., Methods: In this three-arm trial, we reviewed patients without brain metastases who received the BRAF/MEK inhibitors encorafenib and binimetinib until they had progressive disease followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab (arm A); or treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by encorafenib and binimetinib (arm B); or treatment with encorafenib and binimetinib for 8 weeks followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by retreatment with encorafenib arm binimetinib (arm C)., Results: Brain metastases were discovered during the trial in 23/69 patients in arm A, 11/69 in arm B, and 9/68 in arm C. At a median follow-up of 56 months, the 60-month brain metastases-free survival rates were 56% for arm A, 80% for arm B (hazard ratio [HR] vs. A: 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.58), and 85% for arm C (HR vs. A: 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.76)., Conclusions: In patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma, the treatment sequence of immune checkpoint inhibition followed by BRAF/MEK inhibitors was associated with longer periods of new brain metastases-free survival than the reverse sequence. A regimen in which immune checkpoint inhibition was sandwiched between BRAF/MEK inhibition also appeared to be protective against brain metastases. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02631447.).

Objectives: Lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, causes distinct adverse events (AEs), including hyperlipidemia and central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Although dose modifications are recommended to manage these AEs, whether dose modifications can achieve optimal blood lorlatinib concentrations and reduce the incidence of lorlatinib-induced AEs remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the association between lorlatinib exposure and AEs in each patient., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer treated with lorlatinib between November 2018 and July 2022. Serum lorlatinib concentrations were assessed using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. All AEs were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0., Results: The median age of the 55 eligible patients was 59 years (range: 23-79 years). All patients were administered lorlatinib after first line ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure. Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 25 patients (25/55, 45 %), including hyperlipidemia in 17 (17/55, 31 %), CNS disorders in 7 (7/55, 13 %), and edema in 6 (6/55, 11 %). Dose modification was required in 23 patients (23/55, 42 %). Among the 36 patients with available data on serum lorlatinib levels at day 28 (±14) and no drug dose modifications, lorlatinib serum concentrations were significantly higher in patients with grade ≥ 3 AEs than in those without AEs (median: 462 ng/mL vs. 177 ng/mL, p < 0.01). In eight patients with data on serial lorlatinib serum concentrations following dose modifications, lorlatinib serum concentrations were effectively reduced, facilitating the ongoing administration of lorlatinib. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the landmark analysis of progression-free survival between patients with dose modification within the first 16 weeks and those without (median: 24.8 months vs. 10.1 months, p = 0.46)., Conclusion: Dose modification of lorlatinib was associated with successful management of AEs and decreased serum concentration of lorlatinib., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Understanding drug behavior within the skin, especially for photosensitive compounds, is crucial for developing effective and safe topical therapies. This study employs Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MALDI-MSI) and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to investigate the skin permeation and photostability of selumetinib, a MEK inhibitor used in treating type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1). The highest amounts of selumetinib in the skin sections were obtained when using the gel formulation, suggesting that it is to be preferred to cream formulations to achieve higher permeation of the drug. Our study also revealed that selumetinib is amenable to photodegradation in ex vivo skin explants, and yields one main degradation product, whose degradation is likely triggered by hydrogen abstraction. MALDI-MSI results showed selumetinib and its degradation product concentrate in skin appendages, indicating these structures might serve as drug reservoirs, potentially prolonging retention and efficacy. This study demonstrates that combining MALDI-MSI with LC/MS-MS can highly contribute to the characterization of the fate of photosensitive compounds in the skin, an essential prerequisite to the development of compound-specific photoprotective measures. It will also pave the way for innovative topical delivery strategies for NF1 treatment.

Introduction: In the era of chemo-immunotherapy, high-risk factors unequivocally predicted inferior outcomes for patients with CLL. The widespread adoption of BTK inhibitors has challenged the practical implications of such testing, as many patients have improved outcomes despite the presence of high-risk features. The impact of adverse prognostic factors, such as unmutated IGHV , on survival has been ameliorated by continuous treatment with BTK inhibitors, but not by finite-duration therapy with venetoclax-based combinations. Furthermore, TP53 abnormalities continue to be associated with worse outcomes in the era of novel agents. New treatment modalities, such as pirtobrutinib, lisocabtagene maraleucel, and ongoing studies combining BTK inhibitors with venetoclax, raise new questions on the significance of prognostic factors of survival for patients with CLL., Areas Covered: Herein, we summarized the available literature on patients with CLL harboring high-risk biomarkers, with a focus on data from key clinical trials., Expert Opinion: Testing for prognostic biomarkers will remain relevant to identify patients who may have increased benefit from novel therapeutic strategies, such as combination therapies and novel agents. Patients with high-risk disease should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.

Purpose: Standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (LA/M STS) is chemotherapy based on anthracyclines, but patient tolerance of chemotherapy is limited. The present trial (NCT03792542) investigated the use of anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced STS, in particular liposarcoma., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, unresectable LA/M STS cases. Anlotinib was given orally at a dose of 12 mg once daily from days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AE) occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and disease control rate (DCR). The safety profile was also evaluated., Results: Forty patients were enrolled from April 2019 to June 2022 and are included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median PFS was 6.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.17-8.71] and the median OS 27.40 months (95% CI, 16.43-not evaluable); 1 patient reached partial response and 26 attained stable disease, with a DCR of 67.5% (27/40). Median PFS and OS times for liposarcoma patients were 8.71 and 16.23 months, respectively. Ten (25.0%) patients had treatment-related AEs ≥ grade 3, with in particular a higher incidence of hypertension (15.0%) and proteinuria (7.5%)., Conclusions: The findings suggest a potential benefit in using front-line anlotinib to treat patients with STS, who are not eligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Of note, the clinical outcomes for the liposarcoma subgroup of patients were encouraging. See related commentary by Napolitano et al., p. 4257., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Cobb syndrome is a rare neurocutaneous disease characterized by vascular anomalies involving the skin and spinal cord at the same metamere. The most common initial symptoms are neurological manifestations such as pain, monoparesis, headache, scoliosis, and motor damage. We present two patients with Cobb syndrome and severe disease burden harboring somatic mutations in KRAS. The two patients were subsequently treated with the MEK inhibitor trametinib, indicating the potential therapeutic benefit of this treatment for patients with life-threatening Cobb syndrome who are currently considered incurable., (© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Background: Ponatinib is a third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust activity in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. Herein, we report the long-term follow-up of the phase 2 trial of ponatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase., Methods: Patients received ponatinib 30 to 45 mg/day. The primary end point was the rate of 6-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). The study was held in June 2014 because of the risk of cardiovascular toxicity, requiring patients to change TKI., Results: Fifty-one patients were treated with ponatinib (median dose, 45 mg/day). Median age was 48 years (range, 21-75); 30 (59%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. Median treatment duration was 13 months (range, 2-25). Fourteen patients (28%) discontinued ponatinib because of toxicities, 36 (71%) after the Food and Drug Administration warning/study closure, and one for noncompliance. Dasatinib was the most frequently chosen second-line TKI (n = 34; 66%). Among 46 patients evaluable at 6 months, 44 (96%) achieved CCyR, 37 (80%) major molecular response, 28 (61%) MR4, and 21 (46%) MR4.5. The cumulative 6-month rates of CCyR, major molecular response, MR4, and MR4.5 were 96%, 78%, 50%, and 36%, respectively. Durable MR4 ≥24 or ≥60 months was observed in 67% and 51% of patients, respectively. The 24-month event-free survival rate was 97%. After a median follow-up of 128 months, the 10-year overall survival rate was 90%. Eight patients (16%) had serious grade 2 to 3 cardiovascular adverse events, leading to permanent discontinuation in five (10%)., Conclusion: Ponatinib yielded high cytogenetic and molecular responses in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Its use in the frontline setting is hindered by arterio-/vaso-occlusive and other severe toxicities., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Efficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies., Design, Setting and Participants: Patients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany., Interventions: Cabozantinib was administered as a standard of care., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized., Results and Limitations: About 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study., Conclusions: Cabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure VG: Compensated lectures: AstraZeneca, Astellas, BMS, EISAI, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, ONO Pharmaceutical, Novartis/AAA. Advisory Board: Apogepha, BMS; EISAI, EUSA Pharm, Cureteq, Debiopharm, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Oncorena, PCI Biotech. Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer. Travel support: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Janssen, Pfizer MB: RR: Advisory Board: Apogepha,Ipsen, Merck .Pfizer Travel support: Janssen, Pfizer GN: compensated lectures: Roche Pharma, MEDAC, Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Merck, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas; Advisory Boards: Roche Pharma, Sanofi, BMS, Merck Serono, Pfizer, MEDAC, Ipsen, Janssen, Travel support:Roche Pharma, Pfizer, Merck, Janssen, maunscript writing: Pfizer, BMS, Merck MJS: Compensated lectures: Astellas, Apogepha, Bayer, BMS, EISAI, Hexal, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, Medac, MSD, Janssen-Cilag. Advisory board: BMS, Gilead, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen-Cilag. Congress: Apogepha, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Pfizer. Research Grants: Gilead, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, QED, MSD. FA: none, MM: none, MC: none, MOZ: none AW: Compensated lectures: AIO, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, iOMEDICO Advisory Board: BMS;Gilead, Lilly Merck, MSD, Pfizer,Janssen Research Grant: AIO, iOMEDICO AH: none JC: none CD: Compensated lectures from Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. Advisory Board: Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. Travel support: Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen and Bayer HT: none, MS: none, DS: none PI: Compensated lectures: AstraZeneca, BMS, EISAI, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis/AAA. Advisory Board: Apogepha, BMS; EISAI, EUSA Pharm, Gilead, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Oncorena, PCI Biotech. Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer. Travel support: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)